I need to submit a 300 dpi image under 3 megabytes where does it tell me the megabyte size of the image

I need to adjust an image in photoshop that is 300 dpi and under 3 megabytes. Where in the image size window are the megabytes listed. What is the abbreviation for megabytes?

Tim,
In simple terms, the bootldr file is the helper file to load the IOS.
The BOOTLDR environment variable specifies the Flash file system and filename that contains the boot loader image required to load system software.
The variable defines the primary Cisco IOS image that will load the final image from another source.
we need to set the BOOTLDR environment variable to specify the Flash device and filename of the boot loader image.
For Old version of IOS, there is a requirement of boot loader image to boot up the IOS image.
But for the latest version of IOS, no need for boot loader image.
Below are few things happen when the device boots:-
1. The router initially boots into ROMMON (this is your bootstrap code, which you can see in the show version command).
2. Then the router loads into the bootloader code (this is the bootloadr code, which you see in show version). This bootloader code is just an intermediate step between the ROMMON mode and the IOS mode.
3. The router then boots into the IOS mode from the bootloadr mode.
So if you do not mention the bootloadr specifically by giving the "boot bootloadr" command, the router will assume the bootloadr to be in bootflash of the device and try to boot it from there. If you mention the "boot bootloadr flash:...." command, then the router will look for the bootloadr in the flash (instead of the bootflash). Thats the only difference.
However, in both cases, if you have a valid IOS to boot into, then the router will come up without a problem, irrespective of the fact whether bootloadr image is in bootflash or flash.
HTH
REgards
Inayath
*Plz dont forget to rate if this info is helpfull.

Similar Messages

How can you save keynote slides as high resolution (300 dpi) images?

Apparently there is a way to save powerpoint slides as 300 dpi images, with some finagling, but not the mac version. Does anyone know how to do this in keynote? Or is there a relativley easy way to do it with free/cheap software? I can increase the dpi in photoshop, but it doesn't produce crisp images for obvious reasons.

how can you save keynote slides as high resolution (300 dpi)
to save individual images from each slide in Keynote;     file > export > images > TIFF (for optimum quality)
You are using the wrong terminology to describe creating an image file
- dpi ( meaning dots per inch ) is the measurement used in printing to create the number of print dots per inch that will be deposited on to physical media like paper or film   This is done in the printer settings box of the print driver and is dependant on how the individual printer can print..
ppi ( meaning pixels per inch ) is the measurement you need to use when creating the number of pixels in a digital image file. You establish image resolution in Keynote using the inspector;
Keynote > inspector > document > slide size
I can increase the dpi in photoshop, but it doesn't produce crisp images for obvious reasons.
You can resample images in editing applications such as Photoshop or Painter but what you are doing is adding non image information to the image to increase pixel count, this is called noise. As you state this is not the procedure to use in your situation.

PDF does not display 300 dpi images in Safari only

I have a dynamically generated PDF that contains a 300 dpi image. The image added can be one of several that the user selects. On all other browsers the pdf renders fine. On Safari only, seemingly in all modern flavors of OSx and Safari, the images begin to print and then stops printing the actual image and grey is printed in the remaining space the image would take up. To make it more fun one of the images renders fine. It is the 3rd smallest image and the 2 smaller ones do not render so it does not seem to be size related. Hoping someone here has seen this before.
This is a screenshot to use as an example:
The folding instructions graphic is also 300dpi.

Thanks Hackintosh.
It prints as it views, as a corrupt jpeg. I also dug into console and it confirmed there was an error about a corrupt jpg. The most interesting thing is if I open the bad pdf in Photoshop the whole image is there with no signs of corruption. This leads me to believe it's something with how OSx and/or Safari are rendering the jpgs. Another curious sidenote, Safari on Windows works fine but if you save the pdf, move it to a mac and open it, you get the corrupted jpg again.
I think I'm going to try and stop swimming upstream now. At the end of the day I don't care if the images are pngs, tiffs, or eps. I'm going to try feeding a few different formats and see if that doesn't fix the problem.

How to generate 300 DPI image from canvas using Imagesnapshot

Hi all,
I want to generate image from my canvas.
I tried using bitmapdata and imagesnapshot.
Bitmapdata has no property called DPI.
Imagesnapshot allows to set DPI but it is not generating 300 dpi image.
Any idea?

You are in the Using iPhone forum. I will ask the hosts to move this to the iPad forum. However, I'm not aware of any setting change you can make to the cameras in the iPad or iPhone.

Where does blackberry torch stores the current wallpaper image?

Where does blackberry torch stores the current wallpaper image?

In Media > Pictures > Specific Folder Name as per Theme name.
tanzim
If your query is resolved then please click on “Accept as Solution”
Click on the LIKE on the bottom right if the post deserves credit

I need to capture a 300 dpi still image from my film to send to a magazine, how can I do that? Thank you.

I am trying to capture the still image and it comes as 72 dpi. I need the 300 dpi for a magazine.
Some places suggests that I transfer it to 300 dpi using photoshop. But the best is to go from the original.
Can someone help me with this?
I have shoot my video using a canon 5d
Thank you,
Betty

Video does not have dpi. Pixel size is fixed. dpi is a print function. The only way to create 300dpi is to use scaling in Photosop or to use a dedicated application like PhotoZoom Pro, which is what I have always used for my books to create high resolution print images of screen shots.

Help! My 300 dpi images are printing low quality!

I've purchased print-ready images (300 dpi) from an extremely well-known stockphoto website to use in a brochure I'm creating. On the brochure cover (which is 8.5" x 5.5"), I have placed 14 of these print-ready images. (FYI-all of these print-ready images are pictures of people smiling while doing various activities.)
As you can imagine, I have had to reduce the scale of each of these print-ready images to approximately 1" x 0.7" to fit on the page. The layout itself looks really nice, but when I attempt to create a .pdf using the "Print Booklet" option, all of my images look horrible! I've also attempted to create a .pdf using the "Export" function and selecting "Press Quality" and my images are slightly better, but still look horrible!
I have also re-scaled the images in Photoshop (leaving them at 300 dpi) and created a .tiff file, but no matter what I do (and I've been wrestling with this single problem for DAYS), I can't get these images to actually appear clearly on a printed page. When I forwarded my brochure (in .indd, .pdf, and .eps formats) to a professional printing company, they came back to me telling me to use print-ready images.
I've been working with print-ready images for well over a year and have sent multiple jobs to professional printers and this is the first time I've ever had a problem with images looking like they aren't print-ready. Could it be that you can only reduce the size of an image so much? Has anybody had this problem before???
Thanks in advance for your input!

Thanks for the comments thus far! I forgot to mention that all of my images are .jpegs (300dpi).
I've reviewed my "Print Booklet" settings and under my "Images- Send Data," I have "All" selected as opposed to "Optimized Subsampling." My Effective Resolution is also set at 300 dpi.
I'm still working, and am open to more suggestions.
Thanks!

300 DPI images for print?

Hi All,
I'd like to create a promotional leaflet for my activity, where I want to place the picture of the discounted products I'm selling.
what is the minimum resolution I need to (professionally) print them? I understand that images found on the internet can't be used (as they are 72dpi and they would appear pixelated etc.)
I've tried to look at the websites of the companies that produce those products, but couldn't find any high resolution one.
Any suggestions (apart from asking them directly for images, that would take a lot of time?)
thanks,
Patrick

easily controllable color management
True, but in my opion spot 'colour' should not be supported as it it in fact not a colour specification in the first place. Typically, a spot 'colour' is represented as a name callout in the page description and the in separations process the CTP plane/imagesetter plate is rendered with whatever density is defined, but there is no concept of the colour as determined in a device independent colour model.
Colors may or may not be in cmyk.
You mean colourants, not colours. The colourants will be as in the file placed into Pages, or as defined the (limited) colourant controls in Pages. The colours will be as defined in the ICC source colour space embedded in files placed into Pages, and if none is embedded then as assigned by the system level service for the placed colourant model.
tests showed too much ink being laid down
The ink limiting is independent of system level services and is solely dependent on the TRCs and LUTs in the ICC destination colour space either embedded as PDF/X-3 OutputIntent or selected in the driver-level interface. The ink limiting that is part and parcel of the ICC PRTR Printer profile has asymmetric ink limiting internally (e.g. a higher ink limit for Relative Colourimetric than for Perceptual or Saturation) or if the driver is set up to use the wrong ICC PRTR Printer profile as in using a profile with a high ink limit for a coated substrate when in fact an uncoated substrate that should have a low ink limit is loaded into the printing system.
If you use the big commercial applications like Quark XPress and Adobe's Creative Suite they do not use Apple's print engine and completely bypass the issue.
Precisely the same problems with ink limiting will occur in Adobe InDesign (any version) and QuarkXPress (any version) if the user selects the incorrect ICC PRTR Printer profile for the current configuration of the printing system, or if the user selects a correct ICC PRTR Printer profile that internally has a problem such as asymmetric ink limiting even if it should have symmetric ink limiting across the internal tables.
Otherwise, it is correct that Adobe InDesign and QuarkXPress have commands to control transparency flattening for PDF/X-3 such that spline illustration, spline composition, and pixel photography can be interactively processed. The system level service in Apple Mac OS X is a meat cleaver and not a surgeon's scalpel, but in the midterm and longterm transparency flattening should be transferred from the designer to the RIP operator who is the one who controls the configuration of the rasterisation rendering. However, the RIP developers will then compete as to the 'application intelligence' for transparency flattening, and since they will do it differently there will for the indefinite future always be an option to control flattening as well at the designer's desk as at the RIP, with complications consequent on either scenario.
/hh
/hh

300 dpi images turn fuzzy when export as interactive or screen res pdf

Hi, my print brochure is fine, sharp, linked etc. But when I try to export as interactive pdf or screen res pdf, for online purposes, my clean logos and pix turn nasty. Do I need to change them individually to 72dpi and change them to rgb (i thought the export process did this automatically)? Thanks in advance to any answers.

If you choose File > Export > Adobe PDF (Interactive), the default is 72 ppi, but you can set it to a higher value. All images will automatically be convert to RGB, with, I believe, an sRGB profile, according to Dov.

I was given a nano and need to set up name and sync under me; how do I do this, undoing the link to the person I got it from?

I am currently looking at the manual under syncing with itunes, step 2 and it does not pull up for me to automatically to be able to put my info in so I am assuming it is using prior users.

Hello Jenamin,
After reviewing your post, I have located an article that can help in this situation. It contains helpful advice concerning restoring devices:
Restoring iPod to factory settings
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1339
Additional Information
How to rename your iPod
iPod does not appear in iTunes or on the desktop, an exclamation point or sad iPod icon appears onscreen
iPod only shows an Apple logo and doesn't start up
Your Windows PC doesn't recognize iPod
iPod doesn't appear in iTunes or on my Mac desktop
Thank you for contributing to Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
BobbyD

I need to download 10.7.0 (10.7.2 max), where does Apple keep earlier versions of OS?

i foolishly updated my MacPro and laptop to 10.7.3, but then discovered that it messed up some of my Pro apps like Nikon Capture NX2, which is only supposed to work on 10.7.2
i have been trying to find anyway to go back, and was informed that i had to erase and start from the OS that came with my mac
so i went back to 10.6.4, and have now updated to 10.6.8
then went to the App Store in order to update to 10.7.0, which i had already bought
but the App Store only offers me 10.7.3, and no earlier versions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
where can i get 10.7.0?
(i have the combo update which is available on the downloads of Apple website, but this is obviously no good without the base 10.7 already installed)
this appears to be a problem that Apple has created by not selling OS on discs anymore
HELP!!!!

aaaashy wrote:
@shldr2thewheel
since i am at present on 10.6.8 surely i can update to 10.7.0 and then to 10.7.2?
i had already worked out that i could not go backwards from 10.7.3 when i went into an Apple store yesterday, so i am trying to go forward, but it seems quite odd that i can not upgrade to 10.7.2 ONLY since some apps do not work with 10.7.3
and i DID HAVE a backup iof 10.7.2 when i backed up, but once i was on that there did not seem to be a problem, so i updated my backup to 10.7.3 - are you saying that the backup should always be an OS step behind the master? (in which case what about all the new work that one does in between backups, there would be no backups of that at all!)
I have always made a habit of keeping system updates on external drives, just for my own OCD ways. I downloaded Lion 10.7 and have also kept the updates since. I also have backups of the last few system updates, but do get rid of them after I realise the newer updated backups are all I require.
So where did I learn about backups and saving updates? By reading Apple Media and coming to the forum here and elsewhere and reading up on it. The serious Computer user should really make a concerted effort to protect their data and system set ups in the most secure way they can. An $80 1TB backup drive can be the difference between smooth transitions and reinstalls and problems as you are experiencing now.
Just some food for thought for the future. There is more often than not no second chances for system and drive crashes. Protect your data at all costs.
Good Luck
Pete

300 dpi in Lr on the images

Why is ACR still only 240 dpi my DSLR shoots at 300 dpi and my clients demand 300 dpi images so why is Adobe Camera raw still only 240 dpi and not able to read the dpi of the Raw files I have now, will this issue be fixed anytime soon
thank you

Your camera doesn't shoot any dpi, as dpi is a printer term, and meaningless without a physical print.
You can export with the dpi tag set to whatever you want (it's in the export dialog).

Saving in 300 DPI?

Hi there! Wondering if anyone has an answer to my frustrating question.
I do commerical graphics for many clients, and I usually start off with a new canvas of 1200x1200 px in 300 DPI..however, when I export or save for web & devices, the resolution changes usually to 150 or sometimes even to 72 DPI wether I'm saving in JPEG or PNG. I need these graphics in 300 dpi..
I'm guessing it has something to do with compression settings, but I'm just not sure. This is a very big problem for me. Any help is greatly appreciated.
(I'm using CS4)
TIA,
~Jess

Jess,
...I usually start off with a new canvas of 1200x1200 px in 300 DPI...
No, I'm sorry, but you don't. Not in Illustrator. This statement reveals the basic misunderstanding you are stumbling over.
There is no "canvas" in Illustrator in the sense of a program like Photoshop, in which you open a "blank" document of a certain number of pixels, with each pixel just initially being white.
There are no pixels when you create a new Illustrator document. There is just a literally empty document. No pixels, no nothing. It contains no pixels at all, even if you have the rulers set to its ridiculous selection of "pixels." (You'll know why this is ridiculous in a few minutes.)
An Illustrator file contains objects, not pixels. Those objects can be of several different types. One type of object an Illustrator file can contain is a raster image, and raster images, of course, contain pixels. But until there is a raster image on the page, there are no pixels at all. And even when there is a raster image on the page, its scale (PPI) has absolutely nothing to do with the "pixels" of the page rulers.
When you export an Illustrator file as a single raster image--using either the Export dialog or the Save For Web & Devices dialog--that's when you create pixels. In fact, if there are already any pixels on the page (in raster images), those pixels are going to be resampled to new pixels to become part of the one big raster image you export.
Consider: Each raster object on the page in Illustrator is independent. Each one can have a different scale (PPI). So even if your document sizes is ridiculously called "1200 pixels x 1200 pixels", it is not. Consider this example and then tell me how it could be:
Suppose you have drawn a 4" x 4" rectangle on the empty page. You have then rasterized the rectangle at 300 ppi. Clearly, the raster image now contains 1200 x 1200 pixels. But the page rulers say it measures 288 pixels on a side. How can that be? Read on.
so a 1200 x 1200 pixel document at 300 ppi is 4 inches x 4 inches.
In Illustrator, this is absolutely not true. A 1200 x 1200 "pixel" document in Illustrator is certainly not 4 inches by 4 inches. It is 16.666 x 16.666 inches. This is because of one simple fact: The "pixels" referred to by Illustrator in its Document Setup dialog and in its rulers are not pixels at all. They are points (1/72 inch).
If you don't believe that, do this simple exercise:
Create a new document in your customary way, 1200 x 1200 with Pixels as the unit. Now stop here for just a moment, and look in that document setup dialog for where you tell Illustrator what PPI you want the 1200 x 1200 document to be. Can't find it. It's not there. There is no PPI in an Illustrator document, so you cannot say a 1200 x 1200 pixel Illustrator document is 300 ppi. (If it's anything, it's 72 ppi, but even that is skewed logic.)
Now rightClick the ruler and change the unit to inches. How big is the document?
Look at the 1" mark on the ruler. Change the ruler back to Pixels. How many "pixels" are converted to an inch? Keep doing this. Use any trick you can find in Illustrator to make its rulers convert an inch to anything other than 72 "pixels."
Now answer this: How big is a pixel?
You can't answer that question because a pixel can be any size you want it to be. It's like asking 'how big is a space?' The very fact that you can scale an image to any ppi you want (make it 1200 ppi or 12 ppi, without adding or destroying any pixels) prooves that a pixel has no fixed measure. And that's why it's ridiculous for a program like Illustrator to use "pixels" as an absolute distance measure in its rulers the same way it used inches or centimeters. It's pure nonsense.
If a pixel has no fixed measure, then how in the world can you use it as a unit of measure on a ruler? You can't; not legitimately, not in the sense of measuring dimensions of objects or pages. (Remember? Illustrator handles objects. Illustrator's rulers tell you the size of the objects.) Anywhere on that page, there may be a 1200 x 1200 pixel raster image, somehow occupying 72 "pixels" or 3000 "pixels" or 150 "pixels" of your page. Used as it is in Illustrator's rulers, "pixels" is nonsense.
Illustrator's "pixel" rulers are a complete sham. You can put a 1200 x 1200 pixel image on an Illustrator page and make it "measure" any number of sham "pixels" according to Illusrator's rulers you want. Therein lies the answer to your question:
Forget about Illustrator's rulers as being a count of pixels. It is not. It's a measure of 1/72" units (in other words, points). Do not think of the sham "pixels" on the ruler as being pixels. Think of them as being what they are: points. Then your confusion will begin to clear.
Better yet, don't use sham "pixels" as your ruler units at all. You want a 1200 x 1200 pixel raster image exported from Illustrator at a scale of 300 ppi, right?
You've been told you can't do that using the Save For Web & Devices dialog. If you've read and understood the above, you should now know that is not true. You would of course use the Export dialog to create a raster image that embeds a scale factor other than 72 PPI in the image file, because the Save for Web & Devices dialog assumes a browser which ignores the scale factor embedded in a raster image file. But for the sake of understanding, let's use Save For Web & Devices anyway:
Forget about Illustrator's sham rulers. Create your document the size you know you want it to be: 4 inches x 4 inches.
Create your artwork on the page. You can use raster images, text objects, vector objects, or any combination of those.
Now you want a 300 PPI raster export of your whole 4" x 4" page. Third grade math tells us that will require 1200 x 1200 pixels.
File>Save For Web & Devices. The Save for Web & Devices dialog opens. Select the raster file type you want, either JPEG or PNG. Go to the Image Size tab. What do you see? Original Size and settings for New Size. Original Size is 288 x 288 pixels (See? Illustrator unyieldingly considers a pixel on its rulers to mean 1/72 inch). But you can enter 1200 x 1200 (or any other desired pixel count). Click Apply.
Save. Select Images Only.
Launch InDesign. Import the image. Note the size. (Does 16.666 ring a bell?) In the Scale X Percentage field, key "4 in". (That's right, key an absolute value into the percentage field.)
You now have a 1200 x 1200, 300ppi image. You did it using the Save For Web & Devices dialog. And you didn't even use Illustrator's ridiculous "pixel" rulers.
JET

Printers require 300 dpi - A different question/issue about 72 dpi

Hello,
I've read through many of the threads on 300 ppi/dpi. I understand the solutions offered such as batch processing and how the printer will print the image size that equals the 300 dpi. However, I have a different issue. I purchased just this week a Rebel T5 with the assumption that I would be able to take 300 dpi images not 72. I create books for print and my printers require 300 dpi. They will not do the conversion. My options in the past have been film camera to CD (old, I know) or the iPhone. I was spending a lot of time in Photoshop getting the images to printer requirements. So imagine my dismay uploading the first batch of photos into Photoshop and seeing 72 dpi. Yes I was able to change them 300 - but this is exactly the production work I had hoped to not have by purchasing the new Rebel.
There has got to be a better way?
Or is it a different digital camera I need to purchase?
Thank you for your help.

writerinpjs wrote:
Hello,
I've read through many of the threads on 300 ppi/dpi. I understand the solutions offered such as batch processing and how the printer will print the image size that equals the 300 dpi. However, I have a different issue. I purchased just this week a Rebel T5 with the assumption that I would be able to take 300 dpi images not 72. I create books for print and my printers require 300 dpi. They will not do the conversion. My options in the past have been film camera to CD (old, I know) or the iPhone. I was spending a lot of time in Photoshop getting the images to printer requirements. So imagine my dismay uploading the first batch of photos into Photoshop and seeing 72 dpi. Yes I was able to change them 300 - but this is exactly the production work I had hoped to not have by purchasing the new Rebel.
There has got to be a better way?
Or is it a different digital camera I need to purchase?
It's that you (abetted by Photoshop) are reading too much into the term "dpi". The size of a digital photograph is measured in pixels, not inches. For a given pixel count, the picture will print smaller at 300 dpi than at 72 dpi, but will have, by definition, a correspondingly higher resolution. You start with a RAW image and crop it to the desired aspect ratio. Then you compute how many pixels you need in, say, the longer dimension, given the native resolution (e.g., 300 dpi) of the printer and the desired picture size (e.g., a length of 10 inches). Finally, you convert the image to JPEG, setting the number of pixels in the long dimension of the converted image to that computed number (e.g., 3000). Then when you print the image, things will come out right. What you describe above is Photoshop trying to do the calculation for you. But IMO, that usually just adds confusion. Work in pixels and you won't go wrong.
The calculation is different, though just as straightforward, if the printer differentiates "dots" from pixels. But I think most modern printers either don't make that distinction or do it behind the scenes, so that you can specify everything in pixels.
Bob
Boston, Massachusetts USA

How to default 300 dpi in ACR?

Hi all,
if I convert a photograph from ACR (Version 5.5...) in PSE 8 I get the image in 240 dpi (before it has 300 dpi, Nikon settings).
Of course I'm able to do this setting again in PSE (it's an export value for printing) but in ACR/CS4 (for example) you can set the dpi.
The presettings in ACR/PSE8 are very "poor" (7 presettings, 5 checkboxes but no dpi or something). I can't find more possibilities.
Best,
Onno

Indeed, it's an export value but I want to change this export value from 240 to 300 dpi. Please explain me where I find the settings for that.
Please understand: Many cameras write the photographs with 300 dpi (my Nikon too) even this value is the most used for printing. And my wish is to keep this for the whole workflow. But ACR works with 240 dpi.
It's a matter of comfort; no more, no less! But I want to get this comfort (this words are for the Adobe-Sect).
Thanks,
Onno

I need to submit a 300 dpi image under 3 megabytes where does it tell me the megabyte size of the image

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for