I think the benefits of SWR30 have lost by the new update version 5.

Since I have used my SWR30 for a few months, and I think I love it, I was expecting much on the new software update that has been launced recently. However, after updating my SWR30, I realized this update is quite terrible to me, and I would like to share my thoughts here. 1. One of the big changes is about the Notification/Alarm for the incoming messages. Showing the sender's photo/image may look good at first, but it spends too much space on the display, and so, I often have to push the volume button to see the whole message. As a matter of fact, seeing the sender's image is not that important. Just showing the sender's name (as before) is enough. Recall that the benefits of the previous version is that I DIDN'T HAVE TO PUSH THE BUTTON TOO MANY TIMES + JUST BY TOUCHING I COULD READ THE WHOLE MESSAGE (and dismiss the message by touching again). 2. In the previous version, after the message is read, I just touched again and the message was dismissed, which was simple. Now, I have to push the DOWN button a few times to dismiss the message. Maybe the intention was to enable repling the message from SWR30, but I think it's way too much. I prefer to just receive the message by SWR30, and if I want to reply, then I would use my phone instead. Even though I can't reply by SWR30, I love SWR30 because it is just the role of the watch, not any more! Similarly, in the previous version, some message is lost if I don't read it for a while or if too many messages are incoming. In fact, I liked this since, if there too many messages, I often want to pull out and use my phone instead of SWR30. (Just showing there are messages that I didn't read on top of the display may be enough.) 3. In fact, I loved receiving message by SWR30 because many messages to me are often not that important, and so, I could just ignore them. Only when I think I got important message, I could just use my phone from the pocket. I think this is important. Just playing the role of watch, not going over to the role of the phone, is actually the benefit of SWR30 before. Although there are a few good things in the update, such as reading the message in the vertical mode and improved voice search, I'm just afraid that the watch is losing its simplicity, compactness, and usability (by doing the role of the phone). So, I rolled back to the previous version in my SWR30.... and I wish the engineers at Sony listen to the customers. vinvin 

Totally agree with this post. I like my swr30 a lot less now. Some ideas of the updates are good, but the execution is poorly and unusable. How do you do a roll back as you mentioned?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to get Windows User Name using Oracle Forms 6i, Jinitiator 1.3.1.17

    Hi, Requirement: Get Windows User Name using Oracle Web Forms 6i. Tools Using: Windows NT, Oracle web forms 6i, Oracle 10g DB. Description: I am using GetClientInfo JBean from otn.oracle.com, which gets windows user name, IP address and machine name.

  • Ibook will not boot PLEASE HELP!!!!

    Hi, First the ibook booted then would come up with the kernel error: square box with "you need to restart your computer. Hold down the power button for several seconds or press the restart button...... I then booted to single user mode and ran fsck -

  • Problem with location bar search

    Before upgrading to Firefox4, when I'd type something in the box, Firefox would try to direct me to the location I'd intended. But now with Firefox4, it doesn't happen anymore, and instead, it shows a search result by Babylon Search. what can I do to

  • Mac, WRT 54G, Can I access a Brother MFC9320 on two different subnets?

    (home use) I have a USB server that I can access my USB printers on two different Subnets and I was wondering if I can do the same on the WRT54G. I use 192.xxx.xxx.x for internet use only and 198.xxx.xxx.x for every thing else, like file sharing, mul

  • Converting byte to viewable video

    currently i am sending video from client to server and server to client in the form of a byte[], and once it gets to the client i need to write it to a file to then do a runtime.exec to view it in windows media player. the file is a wmv file, is it p