ICR - Wrong display of assigned documents in Object Groups.

Hello ICR gurus,
Hello,
We are just about to start with UAT and we have found this error which is a major problem for us.
When we run the automatic assignment step via FBICA3, the system starts assigning documents automatically based on the matching rules that we
have customized. After this, it starts classifying the matched documents based on the account groups defined in the customizing.
The problem is, that sometimes one side of the matching falls into one group and the other side of the matching falls into another group and
then the user cannot see the assigned documents in the same screen.
We were thinking of using a BADI that gets called after the automatic assignment but we think this is a huge thing to do with a BADI because we would be changing the way the standard fucntionality works with our code.
Any other ideas?
Thanks a lot
Regards
Isabel

Hello Isabel,
Where in your scenario is the problem:
#1 The object groups are defined incorrectly.
#2 The data is posted incorrectly.
If #1 is the case - change the object group definition
In case of #2 it seems to me that what you want is more transparency where the issue is so the users can make the necessary adjustment postings. It would be good to have a specific scenario here.
Why did you create the object groups you created? Are these examples you're referring to based on the fact that the invoices were posted incorrectly?
In FBICR3 you would usually use either just one object group (Open Items) or two object groups (Payables and Receivables). Are GL open items classified as payables or receivables incorrectly when integrating them into process 003?
Hope this helps. If you need additional answers, please provide more details and specific examples...
Ralph
P.S.: Instead of adding these other documents to the object groups where they don't belong you could also add a function which will display the partner documents for the currently displayed "assigned" documents which don't have their partner documents in the display in a popup. That way you're still showing the problem (partner document is not posted correctly) but give them a little more information how to correct it (item should have been posted to account ABC instead of BAC)...

Similar Messages

ICR 002 - Object Groups and Sets

Hi,
Tcode here is FBCR009.
I need one help on the PROCESS 002 for ICR. In the current system, we have implemented the Object groups and Sub groups as mentioned below:
Object Group - 100
Object Subgroup 100
Object group Sequence      Company Field Company Set   Description                   Partner Field     Partner Set    description
100     1     RACCT     RULE2A     B/S Cash Management     RACCT     RULE2B     B/S Cash Management
100     2     RACCT     RULE3A     B/S ST Interest Bearing     RACCT     RULE3B     B/S ST Interest Bearing
100     3     RACCT     RULE4A     B/S ST Non-Interest Bearing     RACCT     RULE4B     B/S ST Non-Interest Bearing
100     4     RACCT     RULE5A     B/S ST Non-Interest Bearing Derivatives     RACCT     RULE5B     B/S ST Non-Interest Bearing Derivatives
100     6     RACCT     RULE7A     P&L LT Interest     RACCT     RULE7B     P&L LT Interest
100     7     RACCT     RULE8A     P&L ST Interest     RACCT     RULE8B     P&L ST Interest
100     8     RACCT     RULE9A     P&L Toll     RACCT     RULE9B     P&L Toll
100     9     RACCT     RULE10A     P&L Royalties     RACCT     RULE10B     P&L Royalties
100     10     RACCT     RULE11A     P&L Rent     RACCT     RULE11B     P&L Rent
100     11     RACCT     RULE12A     P&L Brokerage Commission     RACCT     RULE12B     P&L Brokerage Commission
100     12     RACCT     RULE13A     P&L Warehousing     RACCT     RULE13B     P&L Warehousing
100     13     RACCT     RULE14A     P&L Misc/Other     RACCT     RULE14B     P&L Misc/Other
100     14     RACCT     RULE15A     P&L Insurance     RACCT     RULE15B     P&L Insurance
100     15     RACCT     RULE16A     B/S LT     RACCT     RULE16B     B/S LT
I am a little confused here. The following sets under the sub-group has a logical u201CANDu201D . the customer corporate reporting group would like to see the Config to allow each group of accounts defined as ruleXa reconciled to group of accts defined as ruleXb, e.g.
Rule 2A with Rule 2B
Rule 3A with Rule 3B etc
Each Company set should only reconcile with the partner set.
looked at this OSS Note 1499183 - ICR: Documents are not assigned to the object groups & got even more confused.
Request if you can advice here.
Regarzds
Aahish

Hello Johannes,
Unfortunately what you are trying to do is not possible.
Object groups are defined using the information in the totals table. Therefore fields only available in the line item table cannot be used when setting up object groups. Unfortunately it is also not possible to set up status fields on the totals level because of the standard update process of those fields when setting a status (the line item table is modified directly, there is no totals update). Depending on the details of your setup you might be able to simply add a "normal" field on the totals level and then fill it via BADI. This would probably work quite well if the field does not have to be set manually - and in this case you do not really need the functionality of setting a status manually either.
I hope this helps you in your efforts!
Ralph

Can't display archive change documents for agreement (COND_B)

Hello,
I want to display archive change document for object class : COND_B (agreement) via transaction MEB3:
The archive works fine, and I can found the archive change documents form SARA.
(Archive Objetc = CHANGEDOCU
Archive info structure = SAP_CHANGEDOCU2 (is active))
But the display from the application transaction : MEB3 doesn't work.
In the DEBUG:
the Function module is called automatiquely: COND_B_DISPLAY_DOCUMENT
THEN SUBMIT RSSCD100
THEN The function module is called with the no parameter READ_CHANGEDOCU (ie with space value)
THEN the program reads only from DB
Question : HOW I oblige the program to read from the archive (READ_CHANGEDOCU = 'X') ?
I checked these SAP notes 1050935,1299903, 1308024, 1128954, 1050335
but no results.
May be I forgot some customizing ( SARA,, AOBJ )?
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
As I understand, the change documents archived using the CHANGEDOCU archiving object are no longer available using the application object.
Refer to Notes 1257133 and 140255 where they mention the above point.
If you want to read change documents along with the application, then you must first archive the change documents along with the application.
In your case, for agreements, you should use object SD_AGREEM so that the change documents also gets archived along with the agreements. Refer to note 761281 to check whether the archiving class CHANGEDOCU is already defined along with object SD_AGREEM in your system.
Hope this helps,
Naveen

Display of Material Documents via ME23N w/o assigning MIGO

Hi,
We currently have a SOD issue wrt to MIGO.
To display the Material Documents via the Purchase Order History in ME23N, access to MIGO is required. And in order to release a Service Entry, access is required to the M_MSEG objects which is also used for doing a Goods Receipt.
Once we assign the Role with only display access to MIGO (to view material documents via ME23N) and we assign the role to release Service Entries, the User can do a Goods Receipt via MIGO.
Is there any other way to allow access to display the Material Documents via ME23N, without assigning access to MIGO? The Object M_MSEG_WMB is already in the role, but the SU53 still shows access is required to MIGO.
Thanks

Hi
Sure I've seen/replied to this question before but I'm having a grey moment
Service entry sheets and goods receipts are similar in their purpose - to allow the next step in the procurement process after the goods or services have been provided.
Basic SoD rules state that having access to a purchase order (doc type NB say) and ML81N or MIGO in change mode is a conflict
Having PO doc type UB (or any Z version of it) with goods receipts should be okay as this is only moving stock within the company.
Basically, don't try to find a way around the objects bleed...

ICR - Mark Assigned Documents for Payment.

Hi All,
I am looking at enhancing the ICR functionality by adding an option of marking assigned documents for payment, and was wondering whether anyone has done something similar. What I would like to do is to let the user have an option (additional button) where the assigned (without differences) documents i.e. reconciled across both partner companies, are marked with a flag that can later be used in the F110 selections. This could be the ZUONR field as an example, and should happen in the leading company documents only. I am aware that there are possibilities to automate correction postings from within FBICR3 but am not sure if this would cater for mass document changes to the underlying data?
Any advice (.e. is there a standard BADI) will be appreciated.
Thanks
Kris

Hello Kris,
There is no standard functionality or BADI example implementation.
Implementing a BADI would make sense if you would want to trigger this manually. Otherwise it would probably be better to run a program to process mass data...
Best regards,
Ralph

Wrong business area assigned to the company code

Hi All ,
I am getting error " Wrong business area assigned to the company code " while posting a document in F- 02
please advise

Dear Balasubramaniyan,
You can supress the field Business area field in Field status Groups.
For this follow the following steps
Please check TCode OBC4 for field status variants
> Goto G001 (General) Field status group
>Additional Account Assignment
> Click supress in front of business area.
In that case, F-02 will not even ask for business area.
Also check whether Business area FS is ticked in front of your company code in TCode OB65
You may also refer to the following thread
How to assign business area to company code?
I hope this solves your query.
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh
Edited by: Saurabh Khandelwal on Nov 8, 2011 1:53 PM

BSP for Creation and change and display of the documents in SAP R/3.

Dear All,
In SAP R/3 system, the documents can be maintained using the T-Codes CV01N, CV02N, CV03N for creation, change and display of the documents. Users is allowed to access to these transaction using the BSP application. The BSP page would be used to enable access the T-Code CV01N, CV02N, CV03N and allow uses to carryout the functionalities of check in and checkout of the document and the object links.
do i need to replicate all these T-Codes in BSP application?
If anybody hv done this...pl suggest me and give me the code.
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep
Message was edited by:
Pradeep Reddy

if you want this out of BSP, yes you have to code all of them there is not easy way.
but if the idea is to webenable these transaction and you dont have much time/resource to do it , easiest way is to go with ITS. downside of this is that you dont have much control over look and feel.
If you are on WAS6.40 or above your application server comes with integrated ITS and enabling the same is quiet simple.
Regards
Raja

DMS BAPI_DOCUMENT_CREATE2 Class type Technical Document Category, object ty

Hello Experts!
The problem is that DMS import functionality stoped working after supp. pack implementation.
The process is based on BAPI_DOCUMENT_CREATE2 functionality.
The first problem was an error "The status set requires a previous status" which was causes dy note 1157678
(http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/Error-Thestatussetrequiresapreviousstatus)
After setting break point/de-implementing that note additional error appeared:
"Class type Technical Document Category, object ty"
Does anyone have idea what caused the problem, or which sap note did that? before SP19 implementation that error was not displayed.
Current highest support package is SAPKH60403.
Thanks in advance for help,
Rgds,
LB

Hi,
That error refers to updating characteristics for classification (addnl data tab in DIR).
Does anyone know what could cause the problem after support pack implementation?
Is it possible that bapi_document_create2 > api_document_maintain2 disables an option to update classification?

Cost assignment-Multiple cost objects being selected by default from the EP

Hi,
I have created an expense report from the Portal and entered the cost object - a WBS element and saved the report. Now, when I check in table: PTRV_SCOS, it shows me the cost object assigned are - both - the WBS Element as well as the Cost center. This is incorrect as there should be only one cost object - either the cost center or the WBS element. However, when I book the expenses from the backend, it works fine. Only the WBS or cost center is displayed in the table mentioned above. Anyone has any idea as to why this is happening?
Many thanks in advance for your efforts.
Cheers guys.
Hope to hear from you soon
Best regards,
Tanmay Dhingra
Edited by: Tanmay Dhingra on May 17, 2011 10:05 AM

Hi All,
First of all, thanks for your responses..
Right, about the issue, what I explained here was that I am indeed assigning only one cost object: the WBS element. The issue was that even though I am assigning only the WBS element, it was also assigning the cost to the cost center by default. I did some R&D and found the solution to the issue (I was also asked to look for OSS notes but was not satisfied that this issue needs an OSS note to be applied so tried my solution). The issue was in table: T788M (allocate costs to variable account assignment). Here, I created an entry and called it USERGROUP_2 (just a random name) and assigned the variable cost objects (only the WBS and the Cost center) to be displayed. In the next step, I assigned this usergroup to the country in quesion feature (TRVCO). By doing this, I tell the system that only these cost objects are to be considered when an employee wants to assign the cost object. If the system sees that there is no value from the drop down to choose from, it picks up the default cost object (cost center). This was a simple issue that I had to rattle my brains on... but the solution I mention above worked like a hot knife going through butter...
If you guys face this issue, please try this else feel free to get in touch with me on my number below.
Once again, thanks for your responses.
Best regards,
Tanmay Dhingra
+91 880 6666 606

Assign document (DIR) to organization unit (screen 209)

Hello,
I'm trying to assign a document to organizational unit. Or actually it's document info record (DIR) since using document management system (DMS).
I have made configuration in at the DMS side; i.e. my document type has object NORG with screen 209 assigned to it. I haven't been able to find what is screen 209 since I have no knowledge of the program 7cannot use SE80 then).
However, when I'm creating a document with CV01N it shows organizational unit as a possible entry but doesn't give any help (F4) or doesn't allow to enter anything - when I enter org. unit (existing one) and press enter, the field goes blank.
Is there any experience how to assign documents when using HR transactions, such PO10? Or is there a feature or IMG setting in OM I have to active before I can utilise this documents? I've tried to locate but haven't found any. I don't want to use services for object because of the needs for tracking and statuses.
Help is highly appreciated.
BR,
Pipsa

Hello,
I'm trying to assign a document to organizational unit. Or actually it's document info record (DIR) since using document management system (DMS).
I have made configuration in at the DMS side; i.e. my document type has object NORG with screen 209 assigned to it. I haven't been able to find what is screen 209 since I have no knowledge of the program 7cannot use SE80 then).
However, when I'm creating a document with CV01N it shows organizational unit as a possible entry but doesn't give any help (F4) or doesn't allow to enter anything - when I enter org. unit (existing one) and press enter, the field goes blank.
Is there any experience how to assign documents when using HR transactions, such PO10? Or is there a feature or IMG setting in OM I have to active before I can utilise this documents? I've tried to locate but haven't found any. I don't want to use services for object because of the needs for tracking and statuses.
Help is highly appreciated.
BR,
Pipsa

How can display word 2007 document file as a read only on web browser

hi,
i want to display word 2007 document file as a read only that means non editable file. At present i am displaying word file by using response object. please help me.
Thanks,
Raj

Hi dear,
Try with the sample code which has given in below link....
http://forums.devshed.com/java-help-9/need-help-reading-word-document-with-jsp-20316.html
---Vidya
Message was edited by:
ragas

Display word/pdf document in the HTML region or report

Hi,
How to display blob content stored in a table in HTML region or report region.
I already have a process to display the image content.
But my question here is how to display word/pdf document within the html region so that the user can read the document without downloading it.
Any suggestions/solutions would be of great help.
Thanks in advance...
Thanks,
Ramesh P.

I was dead wrong.
The display of images from BLOB is a special case because APEX provides a Display Image item type.
Moreover, HTP/HTF packages also do not provide for handling of BLOB content. So AJAX cannot be used.
Which implies that the only way to get binary content, other than images, is with the use of a WPG_DOCLOAD.DOWNLOAD_FILE call.
This in turn implies that it may not be feasible to "inject" the BLOB into an exist HTML DOM in the Browser.
Regards,

GL account requires assignment to CO object

Dear All,
While preparing excise Invoice the accounting document is not getting released. On going to T-code VFX3 and tyring to releasing the document message comes as "Account 00000 requires assignment to CO object".
Kindly guide on this issue .
Thanks in advance.

Hi
I think it comes form the Account assignment tab in Item / header level of sales order where we mantain the Business Area.
just check the settings (Path -
ENTERPRISES STRUCTURE>ASSIGNMENT>SALES AND DISTRIBUTION>BUSINESS AREA ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT

Acroread 8.1.2 cannot display some Japanese documents

For details and a test .pdf file see:
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376856
acroread 8.1.2 cannot display some Japanese documents although
the Japanese font package and the CMaps are installed.
Checking which fonts are used in the testfile ~RubiJapanese.pdf~:
mfabian@magellan:~/test-texts/pdf/japanese$ pdffonts RubiJapanese.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
MS-Mincho CID TrueType no no no 10 0
Arial-Black TrueType no no no 14 0
Arial-BlackItalic TrueType no no no 15 0
mfabian@magellan:~/test-texts/pdf/japanese$
I.e., this document uses the ~MS-Mincho~ font which comes with
Microsoft Windows. It is not embedded, therefore Acroread has to
search for it on the system and if it cannot find it it should replace
it with a fallback Japanese font.
I have this font installed on the Machine where I am testing but
acroread fails to use it, complains about missing CJK support
(which is not true) and displays only dots instead of Japanese
characters.
You can get the test document from the above mentioned
bugreport, it is attached to comment #1:
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376856#c1

Neha,
Thanks for the response.
We are running acroread headlessly since it is on a remote server that we access via telnet. Without an XServer session, I can't tell whether acroread is able to read and display the PDF files normally. However, we can view the PDFs with Adobe Reader 8.1.2 on Windows and the acroread -toPostScript command-line that we are using does work properly with other PDFs.
I will email you a copy of a problematic PDF shortly.
Regards,
Steven Dickson

Document Type - Object link to be made mandatory

hi All,
We are having a requirement that - For a particular 'Document Type' Object link shall be made mandatory.
Ex: For Doc. Type: ABC - 'Sales Document - Item' is MANDATORY
For Doc. Type: XYZ - 'WBS Element' as Object link is MANDATORY
How do I achieve this?. Pl. advise.
-thanks

Hi ,
In DC10 define document type and assign sap object links . To make fields as mandatory its an risky in DMS customization it will effect on other sap object links like BOM item,BOM header. why beacuse for an BOM item you cannot assign values directly on CV02N.So that you need to create DIR first and than assign BOM item from user t-code .
Regards,
chandu.

ICR - Wrong display of assigned documents in Object Groups.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for