IDOC cannot or should not be sent

HI guys
I have implemented an Idoc-to-File scenario. I used the CREMAS04. I inserted some values for the fields I want to map and pressed "Standard output processing" in the test tool (we19). This information occured: "IDoc 0000000000199020 was saved but cannot or should not be sent"
What is missing?

HI all
This error happened again and I forgot something else which I want to mention now.
In "we19", after inserting the idoc number and clicking on the header of the idoc, don't forget to insert the partner types on both sides. In my case it was "LS", for Logical System.
Bye
Go:khan

Similar Messages

IDoc 0000000000181226 was saved but cannot or should not be sent

Hi,
when i am sending idoc from ecc to pi using we19 this message shown:
IDoc 0000000000181226 was saved but cannot or should not be sent
in sm58 Trfc error status is
EDISDEF: Port SAPDSD segment defn E2WRF1M002 in ID oc type DEBMAS06 CIM ty
This scenario is working fine few days ago but from today it is not working.
Please suggest.
Regards
Mohit

Make sure that the sender partner and receiver partner values corrrespond to the logical system names you have used in your partner profile in we20. Sender Partner Name should be your R/3 logical system name, and Receiver Partner Name should be the Logical System name for which you have created an Outbound Entry in We20.The Sender port and receiver port also should be the one created in We21 for XI, and SAP+"SYSID" for R3
after completing the we19 ,if you click on oubound , you got the error that IDoc saved but not pushed right,
see first check partner profile is properly configured or not for outbound IDoc type,
next check distribution model is configured or not .check port also.
every thing configured correct, then use se38 and run the program RBDMOIND.
Thanks,

IDoc was saved but cannot or should not be sent

Hi,
I am in we19
While sending an outbound IDOC, I am getting the status as "IDoc was saved but cannot or should not be sent".
Kindly help.

hi,
>>>While sending an outbound IDOC, I am getting the status as "IDoc was saved but cannot or should not be sent".
there can be 2 reasons for that:
either you didn't set We20 correctly
or the IDoc has a wrong structure
check out those two and it will work
my book can always help with those:
www.sap-press.de/katalog/buecher/titel/gp/titelID-2086?GalileoSession=50249550A39Xd..iZgI
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Changes in extension data not always sent to CRM Backend

Hi,
In a CRM 5.0 ISA b2b scenario we run into a problem:
<b>Short description:</b>
Changes in extension data on basket item level are only sent to the backend if there are additional changes to that item (for example a change in quantity).
<b>Long description:</b>
We have added an extension field on basket item level and use the standard extension mechanism to exchange this data to the CRM backend. In order to do this we have done the following:
- On the Java side we implemented MaintainBasketDispatcherAction and ShowBasketAction. The overridden methods are parseRequest() (from MaintainBasketDispatcherAction) and isaPerform() (from ShowBasketAction).
- In the backend we implemented the BADI CRM_ISA_BASKET_ITEMS and implemented the methods CHANGEITEMS_SET_DATA, CLEAR, GETITEMS_GET_DATA and SAVE.
We experience a problem when creating an order: When the only thing that changes in an item is our custom field, this is not noticed by the webshop as a change in the item. Therefore the method CHANGEITEMS_SET_DATA isn't called and the extension data isn't updated. If we change another field of an item, for example the quantity, the change is picked up and the method CHANGEITEMS_SET_DATA is being called.
It seems that somewhere an optimization is taking place where the Webshop decides that unchanged lines should not be sent to the backend. I can't find a way to tell the webshop that the lines are modified (i.e. are dirty).
Has anyone experienced similar behaviour or does anyone know of a solution?
Thanks in advance.
Wilco Menge
Java snippet:
parseRequest():
ItemList itemList = preOrderSalesDocument.getItems();
String extensionData = "";
if (itemList!=null && itemList.size()>0)
     for (int i=0;i<itemList.size();i++)
          if (itemList.get(i)!=null);
               extensionData = parser.getParameter("z_extension_data").getValue().getString();
               itemList.get(i).addExtensionData("ZEXTENSION", extensionData);

Hi Pranay,
I need to add a new field to the ISA item sales order in B2B webshop.
I'm trying to use the extension field in the ISA basket item.
I have added a new field in the WEB sales order at item level.
My collegues have changed and implemented the addExtensionData method of the ItemSalesDoc JAVA class.
Moreover I have implemented CRM_ISA_BASKET_ITEMS (BAdI CHANGEITEMS_BEFORE_ORDER) in the backend system.
In the BAdI CHANGEITEMS_BEFORE_ORDER I have copied the extensions data values to the CT_SALES table. Specifically, I have tried to update and change the SUBMISSION field.
It seems that this new value is stored until the GET method (GETITEMS_GET_DATA) is called.
Indeed, when the system calls the GETITEMS_GET_DATA method, I read the CT_SALES buffer using the CRM_ORDER_READ function.
But the new value is no more stored in buffer.
So if I fill the new field in the ISA item sales order, and I click the update button, the new value is no more valued in the screen.
Furthermore, it could be important to know that I'm working in CRM 3.0 release.
Do you know why? May you help me?
Many Thanks
Best Regards.
Daniela

Should not come to AE when the IDOC segment missed

Hi,
I 've done the multimapping from IDOC to mul.files.
Here my sender IDOC line Item contains 2 segments.
Let us assume the first segment named Z1CONSGROUP and having some fields which has mapped to my receiver end files.
In production system we should not have the case where there is no Z1CONSGROUP segment.
Here if the IDOC doesn't contain this segment then it's a payload error and it reached to RWB status : system error.
But, i want to prevent this in production when this Z1CONSGROUP segment doesn't contain the idoc it should n't reach to AE.
How can i do that...is there any option to maintain such a scenario in XI.
Please help me out on this.
Kind regards,
Y.Raj

>
YeswanthRaj Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I 've done the multimapping from IDOC to mul.files.
> Here my sender IDOC line Item contains 2 segments.
> Let us assume the first segment named Z1CONSGROUP and having some fields which has mapped to my receiver end files.
> In production system we should not have the case where there is no Z1CONSGROUP segment.
> Here if the IDOC doesn't contain this segment then it's a payload error and it reached to RWB status : system error.
> But, i want to prevent this in production when this Z1CONSGROUP segment doesn't contain the idoc it should n't reach to AE.
> How can i do that...is there any option to maintain such a scenario in XI.
> Please help me out on this.
>
> Kind regards,
> Y.Raj
the easiest thing to do is,
1. Use a condition on Z1CONSGROUP and use the EX operator (ref: /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination)
2. if the EX gives you a fail, then provide no receiver and use the option 'Options for Behavior at Runtime If a Receiver Is Not Found' -> End Message Processing Without Error (Restart not Possible)
3. Else provide the right receiver and let the flow continue.

Error:IDoc cannot be processed: Qualifier not supported.

Hi experts,
                         I got this error when executing the idoc
message type: dirdeb
basic type : pexr2003
error:Error during creation of internal payment order.
IDoc cannot be processed: Qualifier not supported.
Thanks
Saravanaperumal N

Hello,
001     Customer Purchase Order
002     Vendor Order
003     Customer Inquiry
004     Vendor Quotation
005     Customer Contract Number
006     Vendor Contract Number
007     Collective Number for Quotations
008     Last Purchase Order Number (SPEC2000 Acknowl.)
009     Invoice Number
010     Internal Number (Document)
011     Referenced Document Number
012     Delivery Note Number
013     Internal PO Number
014     Accounting Document
015     Billing Document Number of Invoicing Party
016     Number of Preceding Document
017     Assignment Number
018     Customer Order Number
019     ISR Number
020     Invoice List Number
021     ID for Cost Assignment
022     Payment Document Number
023     Banker's Acceptance
024     Matured Certificate of Deposit (CD)
025     Loan
026     Check Number
027     Foreign Exchange Contract Number
028     Credit Memo
029     Payment Advice Note Number
030     Original Purchase Order Number (ALE)
031     Return Leg Number
032     Reference Bank
033     Third-Party Reference Number
034     Reference Number of Beneficiary's Bank
035     Message Reference
036     Credit Card Number
037     Statement Number
038     Account Statement No. (Deposit No.)
039     Account Statement No. (Deposit Seq. No)
040     Payee Code
041     MICR Line
042     Imported Line
043     Vendor Contract Number
044     Ship-To Party's PO Order
045     Cost Center
046     Profitability Segment No.
047     Work Breakdown Structure Object
048     Profit Center
049     Business Area
050     Delivery Order
051     Delivery Order Route Number
052     Sequence Number
053     Scheduling Agreement Number
054     External Transaction
055     Promotion Number
056     Customer Quotation Number
057     Customer Buying Group
058     Customer Contract Number
059     Check Number from Check Register
060     JIT Call Number
061     Internal Delivery Note Number
062     Customer PO no. for consignment issue by ext. service agent
063     External Delivery Note Number
064     Goods Receipt/Issue Slip Number
065     Repetitive Wire Nummer
066     External Order Number
067     Quality Notification Number
068     External Inquiry Number
069     Business Partner Reference Key
070     Reference Text for Settled Items
071     Customer ID no.
072     Agreement Number
073     Credit Advice Number
074     Transfer Number
075     Check Number
076     Credit Posting Number
077     Transfer number (just transferred)
078     Delivering Profit Center
079     Batch Number
080     Certificate Profile
081     Collective Daily Delivery Note
082     Summarized JIT call
083     External Delivering Plant
084     Tax Number Tax Office §14
085     KANBAN ID
086     Kanban Control Cycle
087     Reference Document Number Billing Doc.
101     Resale Invoice No.
102     Resale Ship and Debit Agreement No.
103     Customer Claim Reference Number
104     Design Registration Number
105     TPOP Order Number
106     TPOP Reference Order Number
111     Partner Business Area
APY     Approval Year of Official Document Numbers
APN     Registration Number of Official Document Numbers
SNC     Serial Number of Statement
These are all the Value range for qualifier, use which one suits your requirement
Regards,
Abhishek

The mail could not be sent to the recipients because of the mail server failure. (Sending Mail using Account 1 (2013-04-30T16:36:52). Exception Message: Cannot send mails to mail server. (Mailbox unavailable. The server response was: 5.7.1 Client does not

Interesting db mail issue. If i click send test mail from sql mgmt studio, it works fine, but when i execute a SP to send a mail, it fails. One thing I noticed is that the "LastModified" column in the mail log shows the domain account when a test
mail was sent from mgmt studio, but show "sa" when the SP was used to send mail.
This is from SQL 2012, did not see this in sql 2008, looks like 2008 always used the service account. any ideas ?
Get this error:
The mail could not be sent to the recipients because of the mail server failure. (Sending Mail using Account 1 (2013-04-30T16:36:52). Exception Message: Cannot send mails to mail server. (Mailbox unavailable. The server response was: 5.7.1 Client does not
Thanks.
Ranga

Hi Ranga,
I also use SQL Server 2012. I send a test email through SQL Server Management and the last modified By “sa”.
If you used stored procedure to send a test email. Please use the command below:
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail
@profile_name = 'Adventure Works Administrator',
@recipients = '[email protected]',
@body = 'The stored procedure finished successfully.',
@subject = 'Automated Success Message' ;
I can both send test email through SQL Server Management Studio and SP. Make sure you have the right profile. Since you could send test mail via SQL Server Management Studio, please try again to send it via SP.
Thanks.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Maggie Luo
TechNet Community Support

Idocs not being sent from 4.6c to 6.0 system

Hello,
I am sending Idocs from a 4.6c R/3 system to a 6.0 R/3 system. I can see that the Idocs are being created and sent to port OK (status 03) in the 4.6c system but not able to see the Idocs in the 6.0 system.
Actually, there are 2 cases but in both cases I am using the same function module 'ALE_DISPUTE_CREATE' to send the Idocs but only in the first case Idocs are received in the 6.0 system. I checked the parameters of the function module in both the cases and they are same in both the cases with the only difference being the values.
One more difference is the way the data is prepared . In the first case, 'FDM_CASE_DATA_PREPARE' is used to prepare the data and in the second case I am creating the data using normal data extraction and internal tables after which I pass the datas to the function module 'FDM_COM_CASE_CREATE' which is also used in the first case.
'ALE_DISPUTE_CREATE' is within this function module.
I checked the queues in both the systems and did not find anything stuck there. One more interesting case, If I copy the Idocs which are not being sent using WE19, the Idocs are being sent correctly and received correctly in the 6.0 system.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Laxman.

Hi Laxman,
You said that the Status of the IDOC at sender side is '03', have you checked the status of IDOC in reciever system. Check the details of DOC using WE02. Use BD87 to Monitor the messages issued during IDOC processing. These messages will help you to reach to the exact problem.
Regards,
Vaishali.

It seems I cannot synchronise my APPS on my Apple TV, should be a real pity if this cannot be done, should not be technically too difficult, any help ?

It seems you can not synchronise the APPS from your store or IPAD to Apple TV. This should not be too difficult, is this really not possible ? This takes most of the fun away,
Tom

Welcome to Apple Community
Sorry. Apple TV doesn't support apps, and we don't know if it will have apps

I cannot update Firefox, the file is damaged it tells to me, or was not correctly sent

There is a recommended updating of Firefox but I dont have the access to install it in my computer. Contact system adminstrator?
I dont have any!! Or it tells me the file is damaged, not correctly sent. What to do?

Download latest Firefox version from one of these links:
* http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/new/
* http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Installing Firefox on Mac
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Installing%20Firefox%20on%20Mac
Check and tell if its working.

IDoc Status 02 ( Could not find code page for receiving system )

Hi All,
I am getting Idoc status 02 when I am trying to send IDocs from ECC to PI system ( Production ).
Error description.
Could not find code page for receiving system
Message no. E0266
Diagnosis
For the logical destination PIP001, you want to determine the code page in which the data is sent with RFC. However, this is not currently possible, and the IDoc cannot yet be dispatched.
Procedure for System Administration
Possible causes are:
1. The entry no longer exists in the table of logical destinations.
2. The target system could not be accessed at runtime.
3. The logon language is not installed in the target system.
4. In the destination system, no logon language is maintained
Please help.
Thanks - Vinay.

Hi Vinay,
Status 02 occurs when data is not passed to port suceessfully. Check the RFC desination is working fine and your able to connect to target system and also check correct port is assigned.
Regards,
Vinod.

"The movie could not be sent to QT, because a file couldn't be found"

When I try to export a 2 1/2 min. iMovie video I made today in pretty much any format, I get the following:
"The movie could not be sent to QuickTime, because a file couldn't be found.
Please make sure that your project disk has write permission, and that you ahve enough disk space. This error can also be caused by some third-party iMovie HD plugins" then tells me what to do if I have said plug-ins. I have no plugins for iMovie.
The flash drive I'm attempting to save to has almost 80mb of available space. Also, something /does/ get saved on my drive, but the (Windows) computer I try to transfer it to won't recognize it and my MacBook's QuickTime refuses to play it.
What is going on?

Welcome to iMovie Discussions.
iMovie - and other Mac programs - prefer (..or need!..) to have any discs, or other devices on which you're saving movie files, to be formatted as 'Mac OS Extended'.
That's different from the (generally) FAT32 format which Windows PCs use. And although Macs can read Windows-formatted discs - so your MacBook can read what's on your Windows-formatted flash disc - Windows machines generally cannot read Mac-formatted discs, so, er, you'd have a problem or two if you want to use any Mac-formatted device with a Windows machine!
Your flash drive - and anything else on which you've saved your 2.5 minute iMovie video - would need to be formatted as 'Mac OS Extended' if you want to use it for iMovie editing ..but you should be able to store a 'self-contained' QuickTime movie on it perfectly well in its PC-formatted state, and that movie should play in Windows when you plug it into a Windows machine if you have the latest Windows version of QuickTime on the Windows PC.
So maybe you exported your iMovie to QuickTime, onto the flash disc, but not as a self-contained movie. If it IS self-contained, then the complete movie would be there, and it's pretty much guaranteed to play. But if you didn't tick the 'self-contained' check-box, then all that gets saved is a very small file (called a "reference file") with a set of "pointers" to what's in the original iMovie project. In other words, you've saved only the details of how to play the movie, without actually saving the actual video file(s), which remain on your MacBook, instead of being on the flash disc.

Error: Idoc name IDoc cannot find request IDoc in Integration Server

Hi,
I am getting an error while working on a scenario.
scenario is Idoc to file. when the Idoc is posted, i am getting the error "ALEAUDIT IDoc cannot find request IDoc in Integration Server" when i see the status in SXMB_MONI
I have tested the message mapping and configuration induvidually. They are working fine.
Kindly help me out in solving this issue.
please reply

Hi,
The AleAduit sent in the case of Idoc to File if the file is posted successfuly is not actually a App Ack, and that is why we get the info Ack not possible.
But, as the R3 might expect this Idoc, XI still sends it back to the Source R3 system.
Regards,
phani

"BlackBerry PlayBook should not be available in the Republic of Ireland"

DO NOT BUY A BLACKBERRY PLAYBOOK IF YOU LIVE IN IRELAND BECAUSE IT WILL NOT WORK AND BLACKBERRY WILL NOT HELP ANYONE IN IRELAND.
HERE'S MY STORY ("HAVE A GREAT DAY!"):
This is the complete message I sent (with a lot of difficulty) to "Blackberry Support" on 3 September 2012:
"I have just received my Blackberry Playbook bought online from PC World in Ireland, where I live. I cannot setup the unit because Ireland does not appear in the list of countries for the Agreement.
In order to register my product I have the same problem: Ireland does not exist as an option. In order to register my product and send this message I was forced to choose "UK" even though I live in Ireland, which is a totally different country.
Please tell me how to get past the Agreement screen on my Playbook."
This is the complete reply I received from "Brad" at "Blackberry Customer Support" (about 6 hours later):
Thank you for contacting BlackBerry Customer Support. We are pleased to assist you.
I'm sorry to hear that you were not able to setup or register the BlackBerry PlayBook in Ireland.
At this time the BlackBerry PlayBook should only be available in Northern Ireland (aka the United Kingdom). The BlackBerry PlayBook should not available in the Republic of Ireland, at present.
If you require further assistance, please feel free to contact us either by replying to this message or by calling us at one of the numbers below.
I will be pending your case for the next two (2) days, at which time I will email you to see if the problem is resolved.
Thank you again for contacting us. Have a great day.
Sincerely,
Brad
BlackBerry Customer Support
Research In Motion Limited
Tel:
Canada Toll Free: 1-877-644-8405
United States Toll Free: 1-877-644-8410
Puerto Rico Toll Free: 1-855-651-4936
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.blackberry.com

Jarviser, I am simply stating the facts about Blackberry not wanting people in Ireland to buy the Playbook. I know it is hard to believe but, I'll say it again, Ireland is NOT in the list of countries in the Blackberry Playbook setup menu. Therefore it is NOT possible to setup the Playbook as a resident of Ireland. Jarviser, you are totally wrong to assume that the only country not listed is Cyprus and your questioning of my facts is not appropriate.
Yes, it does sound unbelievable but Ireland (Eire, Republic of Ireland, Irish Republic) is also NOT in the list of countries where the new owner can legally register the product. The so-called "Blackberry Support" is ONLY available AFTER the product has been registered – which is why it was difficult for me to even get a message to "Support" at all.
A few Irish customers may be willing to register using a false address in the UK or another country but, as well as being totally against the moral principles of many Irish people, it would also mean potential legal and practical problems with returning faulty products, guarantees, etc.
On another moral point: Blackberry is selling Playbooks to PC World/Curries in Ireland, knowing that they cannot be legally registered and knowing that many customers will simply not be able to setup and use the Playbooks at all because they can't get past the initial setup and registration process. The only option for many people will be to return the Playbook to PC World/Curries for a refund, after a lot of frustration and disappointment with Blackberry.
As a PR exercise, Blackberry is really shooting itself at a time when it already has lost a lot of customers to rivals and is in serious financial difficulties. Whoever is running Blackberry needs to wake up to the real problems the company is facing, including this dishonest selling of Playbooks in Ireland. Do any of them ever even read these forums?

SMTP server down - Still server should not crash!

Hi,
I'm using Weblogic 5.1 with service pack 9 installed and am using the
Process integrator environment with that. In my flow, when I send a mail
notification, in the situation that the SMTP mailserver is down, I do not
want to sent the mail message this time. Rather I want to have the mail sent
only after the SMTP host is available. How do I queue this mail message? Or
how can I build an listener interface that I can use to detect presence (or
absence) of the SMTP host.
Can I use the JMS services? if no, then what?
The exception (an obvious one) that I get is as follows :
javax.mail.SendFailedException: Sending failed;
nested exception is:
javax.mail.MessagingException: Unknown SMTP host: mySMTP.net;
nested exception is:
java.net.UnknownHostException: mySMTP.net
at javax.mail.Transport.send0(Transport.java:219)
at javax.mail.Transport.send(Transport.java:81)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflow.action.ActionSendEMail.execute(ActionSendEMail.
java:185)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflowprocessor.WorkflowProcessorBean.executeActions(W
orkflowProcessorBean.java, Compiled Code)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflow.action.ActionCondition.execute(ActionCondition.
java:95)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflowprocessor.WorkflowProcessorBean.executeActions(W
orkflowProcessorBean.java, Compiled Code)
at com.bea.wlpi.server.workflow.Start.activate(Start.java:124)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflow.Workflow.instantiate(Workflow.java,Compiled
Code)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflowprocessor.WorkflowProcessorBean$1.invoke(Workflo
wProcessorBean.java:709)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflowprocessor.WorkflowProcessorBean.performWithError
HandlingWorkflowProcessorBean.java:1098)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflowprocessor.WorkflowProcessorBean.instantiate(Work
flowProcessorBean.java:705)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.workflowprocessor.WorkflowProcessorBeanEOImpl.instantiat
eWorkflowProcessorBeanEOImpl.java:466)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.eventprocessor.EventListener.checkTrigger(EventListener.
java, Compiled Code)
at
com.bea.wlpi.server.eventprocessor.EventListener.onMessage(EventListener.jav
a, Compiled Code)
at
weblogic.jms.client.JMSMessageConsumer.readQueue(JMSMessageConsumer.java,Com
piled Code)
at weblogic.jms.common.MessageQueue.execute(MessageQueue.java:748)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java,
CompiledCode)
Preyas

ian01 wrote:
I have read a great deal about 'authentication' and appreciate the reasons for this but still have some questions.
Until this weekend my wife has used our BT Home Hub ISP to send and receive email via her two own domain accounts that are not BT accounts - I always use my BT account.
Suddenly she cannot send - smtp not recognised
I have 'verified' her domain accounts and added to my BT account
I do not understand why I should put my account details (username and password) on her outgoing email account details
Surely a fundamental principle of wifi connections should be that someone, a casual visitor to my house for example, should not have to change accoutn details - certainly not have access to my username and password details, in order to use my ISP?
Or am I missing something?
Thanks
Ian
Hi Ian.
You can set up a BTinternet sub account for your wife, and use those details for verification and then put them into any mail client program.
I'm somewhat suprised that she was able to send non BTinternet emails using the BT mail servers without address verification, since this was introduced over 3 years ago! (Though over this time, it has seemed to "catch up with people" ...)
Since you are responsible for your connection, any casual visitor needs to either have their own way of sending emails (e.g. via webmail) or they will need to alter their mail client details. This is pretty much the same for all ISPs. Most will not allow emails to be sent from other ISP mail servers. If they use 3rd party mail servers, then this is usually unaffected.
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/shortcuts
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/pictures

IDOC cannot or should not be sent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for