IDOC TO FILE Segment Error

Hi,
   I am doing IDOC->FILE. When I am posting to Idoc I am
gettng this error in R/3 - "Segment 'ZMESSAGE',
segmentnumber '000001' not correct in structure ZIDOC"
thx and regards,
Ansar.

Hi Ansar,
In your R/3 system from where IDoc is triggered check whether the idoc segment ZMESSAGE is released.
Pls do check whether the latest idoc metadata is existing in the IDX2. If not pls do delete it using IDX_RESET_METADATA report and try it.
Also do compare the structure you are using for the IDoc is similar to the one which is being used in the integration repository. If not pls do reimport it.
Cheers
JK

Similar Messages

  • Graphic Mapping:IDOC to File-Avoid Error in Adapter Engine

    Hi all,
    I'm using Graphic Mapping in my IDOC to File scenario in which each segment in source IDOC will generate a ROW in target File with the condition: DATBI >= currentdate (and some other conditions)
    I have a UDF and use the mapping function CREATEIF for this purpose:
                                 DATBI -> UDF -> CREATEIF -> ROW
    Problem scenario: In the source IDOC if all the segments have DATBI < currentdate then there is no ROW created, and I get the error in Adapter Engine
    Exception in XML Parser (format problem?):'java.lang.Exception: Message processing failed in XML parser: 'Conversion configuration error: Unknown structure ...
    How can I avoid this?
    I've tried to put this condition using XPATH in Interface Determination and got the error.
    There is a way to use function current-date() in XPATH condition?
    Thanks for your help,
    Elaine

    Hi all,
    How can I "suppress the row node if condition fails"? I'm new in PI, so please give more details.
    My FCC as follows:
    Record Structure: Record, Row
    Row.addHeaderLine 0
    Row.fieldSeparator ,
    Record.fieldSeparator 'nl'
    Row.endSeparator ; 'nl'
    It works fine if the condition satisfied.
    In Message Mapping, I've use Test to double check my mapping, and in the scenario that conditions fails, there is no Row in the target message.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,
    Elaine

  • Idoc to file scenario error

    Hell Experts,
    I have done desgin and configuration from Idoc to File Scenario in XI Intergration server.
    Source is R/3 and Target system is File. I have successfully configured each and every step. Send Idoc from R/3 to Intergration server and run sxi_cache. But  I didn't get successful results, always the error message shows in SXMB_MONI as follows:
    Ackn Status  contains system error
    During the application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_CUST_MMAP_ a com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException was thrown: RuntimeExcep
    tion in Message-Mapping transformatio~
    Exception of class CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING
    My system Patche level as follows:
    SAP_BASIS     640        0012        SAPKB64012
    SAP_ABA     640     0012                SAPKA64012
    PI_BASIS     2004_1_640 0009        SAPKIPYI69
    SAP_BW     350     0009                SAPKW35009
    The above error is related to patches problems or any Mapping  problems ?
    Please  help me.
    Advanced Thanks.
    Regards,
    Chandra

    Hi,
      This may be a mapping issue, try this:
    a)in interface mapping see if grids are formed at source and target after executing the test option,
    b)also take the xml of the idoc from sxmb_moni , copy it and paste it at the source of the mapping ( use the src tab now) and execute the mapping, is your file structute formed?
    i am not sure of the patch levels.
    Regards,
    Anirban.

  • Seeburger IDOC-to-File scenario: Error using Classifier module

    Hello,
    I am running the following scenario: ORDERS.ORDERS05 IDOC -> XI -> X12 850 4010 File.
    In the file receiver channel, I am using Seeburger's Classifier and BIC modules as follows:
    localejbs/SeeClassifier        classifier
    localejbs/CallBicXIRaBean      bic
    CallSapAdapter                 0
    classifier   attID             classifierAtt
    classifier   destSourceMsg     MainDocument
    classifier   showInAuditLog    true
    bic          classifierAttID   classifierAtt
    bic          destEncoding      UTF8
    bic          destSourceMsg     MainDocument
    bic          destTargetMsg     MainDocument
    bic          mappingName       AUTO
    bic          newLine           true
    bic          srcEncoding       UTF8
    After conversion in XI, the file fails to write to the folder because of this error:
    Message processing failed. Cause: javax.resource.ResourceException: ---
    Conversion of synchronous request from module chain ended with errors
    ---Error: [Error:ID=1010;LEVEL=1] BICMapping runMapping() The mapping:
    See_XML_AnsiX12 you are trying to load cannot be found in the classpath!
    Maybe you forgot to compile or to activate the mapping! DESCRIPTION:
    BICMapping Error: The mapping [not specified] you are trying to load cannot
    be found in the right path! Maybe you forgot to compile or to activate the
    mapping!
    When I set the mapping directly to See_X2E_AnsiX12_850_V4010 instead of using the Classifier module, the configuration works fine.  But I want to design the receiver channel to be able to receive all types of EDI messages coming from XI.
    I am only facing this problem for the IDOC-to-File scenario.  Somehow the same configuration works for a File-to-IDOC scenario.
    I talked to our Basis team and they said that the map See_XML_AnsiX12 does not exist in Seeburger's delivered content, although I believe that it should be.  Has anyone encountered this problem before?
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Arianne

    Hi Yomesh,
    Here is the payload.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <LIST>
      <S_ISA>
        <D_I01>00</D_I01>
        <D_I02/>
        <D_I03>00</D_I03>
        <D_I04/>
        <D_I05>ZZ</D_I05>
        <D_I06>CELORGS01</D_I06>
        <D_I05_2>ZZ</D_I05_2>
        <D_I07>AVX</D_I07>
        <D_I08>032008</D_I08>
        <D_I09>1718</D_I09>
        <D_I10>X</D_I10>
        <D_I11>00401</D_I11>
        <D_I12>000000008</D_I12>
        <D_I13>0</D_I13>
        <D_I14>T</D_I14>
        <D_I15>^</D_I15>
        <S_GS>
          <D_479>PO</D_479>
          <D_142>CLS01</D_142>
          <D_124>058895921</D_124>
          <D_373>20080320</D_373>
          <D_337>1718</D_337>
          <D_28>8</D_28>
          <D_455>X</D_455>
          <D_480>004010</D_480>
          <S_ST>
            <D_143>850</D_143>
            <D_329>800001</D_329>
            <S_BEG>
              <D_353>00</D_353>
              <D_92>SA</D_92>
              <D_324>4500005037</D_324>
              <D_373>20051110</D_373>
            </S_BEG>
            <S_CUR>
              <D_98>BY</D_98>
              <D_100>USD</D_100>
            </S_CUR>
            <S_FOB>
              <D_146>CC</D_146>
              <D_309>OR</D_309>
              <D_352>FREE CARRIER</D_352>
              <D_334>02</D_334>
              <D_335>FOB</D_335>
              <D_309_2>DE</D_309_2>
            </S_FOB>
            <S_ITD>
              <D_336>01</D_336>
              <D_333>3</D_333>
              <D_351>45</D_351>
            </S_ITD>
            <G_SN9>
              <S_N9>
                <D_128>L1</D_128>
                <D_369>GEN</D_369>
                <S_MSG>
                  <D_933>TEST</D_933>
                </S_MSG>
                <S_MSG>
                  <D_933>MESSAGE</D_933>
                </S_MSG>
              </S_N9>
            </G_SN9>
            <G_SN1>
              <S_N1>
                <D_98>BY</D_98>
                <D_66>92</D_66>
                <D_67>6310</D_67>
                <S_PER>
                  <D_366>BD</D_366>
                  <D_93>Graham Crawford</D_93>
                </S_PER>
              </S_N1>
            </G_SN1>
            <G_SN1>
              <S_N1>
                <D_98>BT</D_98>
                <D_66>92</D_66>
                <D_67>6310</D_67>
              </S_N1>
            </G_SN1>
            <G_SN1>
              <S_N1>
                <D_98>SE</D_98>
                <D_93>3M COMPANY</D_93>
                <D_66>92</D_66>
                <D_67>0000019591</D_67>
              </S_N1>
            </G_SN1>
            <G_SN1>
              <S_N1>
                <D_98>ST</D_98>
                <D_93>SAMPLE</D_93>
                <D_66>92</D_66>
                <D_67>6310</D_67>
              </S_N1>
            </G_SN1>
            <G_SPO1>
              <S_PO1>
                <D_350>00010</D_350>
                <D_330>10.000</D_330>
                <D_355>EA</D_355>
                <D_212>10</D_212>
                <D_639>PE</D_639>
                <D_235>BP</D_235>
                <D_234>230-1812-01JDS</D_234>
                <D_235_2>EC</D_235_2>
                <D_234_2>A00000000000002</D_234_2>
                <G_SPID>
                  <S_PID>
                    <D_349>F</D_349>
                    <D_352>TIE WRAP,LOCKING,PANDUIT-PLASTIC PART C</D_352>
                  </S_PID>
                </G_SPID>
                <S_REF>
                  <D_128>CO</D_128>
                  <D_127>4500005037-00010</D_127>
                </S_REF>
                <G_SSCH>
                  <S_SCH>
                    <D_380>10.000</D_380>
                    <D_355>EA</D_355>
                    <D_374>002</D_374>
                    <D_373>20051208</D_373>
                  </S_SCH>
                </G_SSCH>
              </S_PO1>
            </G_SPO1>
            <G_SCTT>
              <S_CTT>
                <D_354>1</D_354>
              </S_CTT>
            </G_SCTT>
            <S_SE>
              <D_96/>
              <D_329>800001</D_329>
            </S_SE>
          </S_ST>
          <S_GE>
            <D_97>1</D_97>
            <D_28>8</D_28>
          </S_GE>
        </S_GS>
        <S_IEA>
          <D_I16>1</D_I16>
          <D_I12>000000008</D_I12>
        </S_IEA>
      </S_ISA>
    </LIST>
    Thanks,
    Arianne

  • IDOC-BPM-FILE scenario ERRORS

    Hi gurus,
    I am trying to send IORDER01(pm order) from an R/3 system to a file, which works fine.
    but when i try to use some business logic like if order type = 'PM01' then only i have to write to the file, using ccBPM, it fails...
    this is my first BPM scenario and am having trouble....have read lot of blogs etc...can u please tell me where i am going wrong...
    I have a data type DT_FILE for writing to the file.
    I have interfaces:
    si_oa_iorder(outbound asynchronous interface for file)
    si_aa_iorder(abstract asynchronous interface for idoc)
    si_aa_file( abstract asynchronous interface for file)
    si_ia_file (inbound asynchronous interface for file)
    I have message mapping MM_IORDER2FILE mapping IDoc to flat file structure
    I have operation mapping OM_IORDER2FILE where I have mapped si_aa_iorder and si_aa_file
    (( Is this right? are both abstract interfaces to be mapped? or do i need to create more mappings like si_oa_iorder to si_aa_iorder etc? please clarify...))
    My IP is very simple with just a 'recv step' having container element of  type si_aa_iorder and 'send step' having container element of  type si_aa_file to start with..i haven't yet put the switch control etc...even such simple IP fails....
    I have created Configuration objects like
    Business System for file receiver
    Business component for Idoc sender with adapter specific details set
    Communication channels for Idoc and file adapters
    No sender agreement as it is Idoc communication
    Receiver agreement between the Integration Process(IP_IORDER2FILE) and the file server
    2 Receiver determinations between BC_idoc_send to IP and other from IP to FileRecv system
    2 interface determinations , one from si_oa_iorder of  BC_idoc_send  to IP and other from si_aa_file  of IP to file recv system.
    This is my setup and this fails....
    My question is..is my message mapping and operation mappings correct? and can u see any obvious blunders i am doing?
    please bear in mind that with same interfaces and sending and recv components, it runs fine without BPM....so please look at the BPM bit of mappings/config that i might have missed and please advice asap..
    Thanks in advance and i am sure there would be lot of gurus for whome it is just a peanut...so please reply...
    Regards
    Jhansi

    Hello,
    I am trying to implement one pi scenario :
    File -> file adapter -> ccBPM -> soap receiver adapter -> web service request -> web service response -> ccBPM -> output file adapter.
    The web service that I call works file from wsnavigator. I have created all the design and configuration objects
    needed for the scenario.
    I place a file with following contents:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
      <SOAP-ENV:Body>
        <pns:GetSetNameWS xmlns:pns="urn:file2soap2fileWSVi">
         <pns:name1>ajeet</pns:name1>
          <pns:name2>phadnis</pns:name2>
        </pns:GetSetNameWS>
      </SOAP-ENV:Body>
    </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
    When I look at the process monitor I get this:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Receiver Determination
      -->
    - <SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">CX_RD_PLSRV</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: No operation with XML root tag http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/.Envelope exists.</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:Stack>Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: No operation with XML root tag http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/.Envelope exists. Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: No operation with XML root tag http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/.Envelope exists. No operation with XML root tag http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/.Envelope exists.</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    I have no clue about this error. Can you help me with this ?
    If yes I can send you more details, if you liked 
    Hoping to get help from you,
    Cheers,
    Ajeet Phadnis

  • IDOC to FILE Scenario-Error in defining Adapter specific Identfier

    Hi All,
    I am configuring IDOC to FILE scenario where IDOC will be send from ECC to PI System.I did following configuration
    I created RFC,PORT,LS and Partner Profile on R/3 System. I had maintained SLD and IR. In ID I created Configuration scenario and business system.When I click on menu->Adapter specific Identfier where I want to specify IDOC Adapter and RFC Adapter. But it is not allowing to edit it is not editable. As we provide LOGICAL SYSTEM,sender system ID and client number of the sender system.

    Hi Kavi,
    I assume you correctly filled the Logical System of your Business System in the SLD...
    Then in Integration Direction, use menu "SLD clear cache".
    Always in Integration Direction, open your Business System, go to menu "adapter specific identifier", and... close to button "close", you should have another button like something ''check'' or "compare to SLD' or ''retreive SDL data'' (I have not an openned PI to check the right term). Use this button to get value stored in SLD to this local definition.
    Mickael

  • Idoc to File Strucutre error..

    Hi Experts,
    The scenario is IDOC to File scenario in which i am mapping the DESADV05 idoc at the source side and at the target strucutre i have structure like below
    MT_Receiver
    Header
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Purc Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    when i populate with mulitiple Purchase orders from the IDOC the output now coming is as below
    MT_Reciver
    Header
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Purc Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Purc Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    But i require the output as ..
    MT_Reciver
    Header
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Purc Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    Purc Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    So what change is required for this, i have checked with maximum options.. didnt get the above structure in output.
    regards,
    Kishore

    Hi Abhishek,
    I have modified the structure as
    MT_Receiver
    Header
    --Field1
    --Field2
    BODY_NODE
    Purc_Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    and when i do testing for the multiple Purchase Orders the output that coming was..
    MT_Receiver
    Header
    --Field1
    --Field2
    BODY_NODE
    Purc_Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Purc_Order
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    SubHeader
    --Field1
    --Field2
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    Details
    --Field1
    --Field2
    --Field3
    So do i need to change any context for this.. still facing this issue
    regards
    Kishore

  • IDOC to File (BYpass)-- Error or Warning  :  " Message Branched. "

    HI all,
    Iam trying idoc to file scenario(bypass)
    my idoc is triggered succesfully and it is reaching to the receiver system.
    but the problem is in SXMB_MONI ,it is not showing my Receiver service details and showing with different symbol like " <b>>></b>  " with message as " MESSAGE BRANCHED".
    what might be the problem....???
    Also Idoc reaching to the receiving system very lately.
    Pls suggest me ASAP..
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Vijji

    In the receiver determination, do you have multiple receivers, i.e , is the same idoc being sent to multiple receivers ?
    If yes, then the message branch is used to split the source message so that it can be send to differetn targets. You will find multiple entires below the Slit Message Entry one for each receiver.
    Regards
    Bhavesh

  • IDoc to File Scenario Error ( IS - Retail )

    Hi all ,
    I was trying scenario IDoc (SAP ECC 6.0) (IS-Retail) to File scenario .
    When i trigerred IDoc from ECC system , it's showing sent successfully to external system or program.
    But the problem is it's not coming inside XI sxmb_moni .
    I have checked the ALE Configuration and SLD configuration .
    Everything is fine.
    When i run the TCODE WE05 for IDocs List in XI , it's getting stucked there and the Error showing is
    "IDoc: 0000000000000028 Status: IDoc with errors added
    External segment name E2WBB01003 cannot be interpreted "
    Even i tried with other IDoc WPDWGR it is showing the same error
    "IDoc: 0000000000000029 Status: IDoc with errors added
    External segment name E2WPW01 cannot be interpreted"

    Hi Ashwin,
    Please check :
    1.The SAP system from which you want to import the  IDocs contains function modules for calling metadata.
    2.You can import IDocs from SAP Release 4.0 and higher.Support Packages Required for IDoc Imports:
    Release    Minimum  Support Package Requirement
    40B                   SAPKH40B48
    45B                   SAPKH45B26
    46A                   SAPKB46A20
    46B                   SAPKB46B12
    46C                   SAPKB46C05
    3.check for the authorizations required to import.
    Also see SAP Notes 677732 (authorizations), 672745 (missing function modules), 212011 (access to IDoc metadata), and 718320.
    check http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/0b/2a6095507d11d18ee90000e8366fc2/frameset.htm
    *Pls: Reward points if helpful*
    Regards,
    Jyoti

  • IDOC-XI-FILE Scenario: Error in ABAP Mapping

    Dear All,
    I am working on IDOC-XI-Flat FIle scenario in which I am using ABAP Mapping as per document "How To Convert an IDoc-XML
    structure to a flat file and vice versa in XI 3.0".
    I created one customized Idoc for this. The Idoc is reacing XI but its flat file is not getting created. Its giving me following error:
    <SAP:Stack>Error in mapping program Z_ABAP_MAPPING_PACKING_LIST (type SAP-ABAP, kernel error ID UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION) An exception with the type CX_SY_REF_IS_INITIAL occurred, but was neither handled locally, nor declared in a RAISING clause Dereferencing of the NULL reference.</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
    I have also gone thru threads posted for the same topic earlier but still I am not been to resolve this error.
    Please help me out in resolving this error.
    Regards,
    N.Jain

    HI,
       Log saying that, u have problem in the mapping program.
      i.e Z_ABAP_MAPPING_PACKING_LIST
       the problem is due declaration of data.
       i hope that, you have some methods.
       those are declared under intialization section in mapping program.
      please use start of selection before the method.
    other wise, it will come under intilization section.
    warm regards
    mahesh.

  • Mapping Error- In IDoc to File scenario

    Hi Experts,
    Got the Mapping error for one interface (IDoc to file). After comparing with successful message found that the field value (TDLINE) is not availbale in first segment (E1EDT10) in idoc for this failed one.
    Mapping is :
    TDLINE -- Exists --- Creatif --- Receiver field(in the file)
    But here due to the the empty value in first segment the message is failed in XI system, next segment values is not trasmitted to the recever end(maping is the same above). To overcome this issue please suggest the suitable mapping design in IR.
    Regards
    Mahesh

    Hi,
    After your CreateIf, use a "IfWithoutElse" by selecting the properties "Keep SUPPRESS Values". To do that, do a right click on IfWithoutElse, choose "Properties".
    With this option, you will keep the fact that you have nothing in the source, and so the target context will have a "SUPPRESS" line.  I have not THE solution, so do your own test.
    If it's not enough, see also about the "mapWithDefault" (but that depends of your real rule).
    Regards.
    Mickael

  • AckRequestNotSupported error in IDoc to file scenario

    Hi,
    I have a scenario from IDoc to file adatper, when i try to run this scenario, every thing is ok except there is a error in message monitor.
    This error is regarding the Acknowledgment("Acknowledgment not possible"), But the ALEAUD IDoc have been sent to the orignal sender (IDoc side) with the empty content except the Header segment such as sender name, receiver name etc.
    And when i tracted the detail information in message monitor, i got the following error information.
      *<SAP:Status>AckRequestNotSupported</SAP:Status>*
      *<SAP:Category>permanent</SAP:Category>*
    I also went through some weblog and artical, i didn't got the solution.
    If some body also have this error?
    thanks & Best regards
    Rocky
    Following is My acknowledgment error information: FYI
      *<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>*
    *- <!--  Response*
      -->
    - <SAP:Ack xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" applicationAckNotSupported="true" applicationErrorAckNotSupported="true">
      <SAP:Status>AckRequestNotSupported</SAP:Status>
      <SAP:Category>permanent</SAP:Category>
      </SAP:Ack>
    Outbound Acknowledgment content:
    - <SAP:IDocOutbound xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <SAP:TABNAM>EDI_DC40</SAP:TABNAM>
      <SAP:MANDT>030</SAP:MANDT>
      <SAP:DOCREL>700</SAP:DOCREL>
      <SAP:DOCNUM>0000000000036022</SAP:DOCNUM>
      <SAP:DIRECT>2</SAP:DIRECT>
      <SAP:IDOCTYP>ALEAUD01</SAP:IDOCTYP>
      <SAP:CIMTYP />
      <SAP:MESTYP>ALEAUD</SAP:MESTYP>
      <SAP:MESCOD />
      <SAP:MESFCT />
      <SAP:SNDPOR>SAPO01</SAP:SNDPOR>
      <SAP:SNDPRN>A01CLNT030</SAP:SNDPRN>
      <SAP:SNDPRT>LS</SAP:SNDPRT>
      <SAP:SNDPFC />
      <SAP:RCVPOR>SAPO05</SAP:RCVPOR>
      <SAP:RCVPRN>A05CLNT231</SAP:RCVPRN>
      <SAP:RCVPRT>LS</SAP:RCVPRT>
      <SAP:RCVPFC />
      <SAP:TEST />
      <SAP:SERIAL />
      <SAP:EXPRSS />
      <SAP:STD />
      <SAP:STDVRS />
      <SAP:STATUS>03</SAP:STATUS>
      <SAP:OUTMOD />
      <SAP:SNDSAD />
      <SAP:SNDLAD />
      <SAP:RCVSAD />
      <SAP:RCVLAD />
      <SAP:STDMES />
      <SAP:REFINT />
      <SAP:REFGRP />
      <SAP:REFMES />
      <SAP:CREDAT>0000-00-00</SAP:CREDAT>
      <SAP:CRETIM>00:00:00</SAP:CRETIM>
      <SAP:ARCKEY />
      </SAP:IDocOutbound>

    Hi Rocky,
    Check the below links of setting up of ALEAUDUT RESPONSE:
    /people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
    Check this document on handling IDOC acknowledgements. This might give you some idea.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
    Please check the above two links if u have missed anything in setting up the acknowledgement.Let me know if u need furthur information
    Thanks,
    Bhargav.
    Note:Award points if found useful.

  • IDoc to File - error code 56

    Hello,
    I have configured the scenario for IDoc XI File. The IDoc from SAP system is triggered out properly, but at XI side by using we05 t-code i found that the IDoc received doesnot contain any data at all. The segment names have been changed and the error code is 56 and 60
    56 status message is: External segment name & cannot be interpreted
    60 status message is: Basic Type is missing.
    I have checked the in idx2 the meta data have been imported properly and also verified the partner profile also both seems to fine.
    Has anyone come across this situation, please do guide me to solve the issue.
    Warm Regards
    Ramesh P
    Edited by: Ramesh P on Jul 17, 2008 6:43 PM

    Thanks prateek for quick response!
    The IDoc used is standard idoc WPDBBY.WPDBBY01.
    and the cancel processing flag has been checked..
    But still it error persists.. i am still able to see inbound idocs in we05 XI side, most of them told that in this scenario you wont be able to see it in we05 XI side. Then how to go about...
    Edited by: Ramesh P on Jul 18, 2008 11:32 AM

  • Error/Doubts in Idoc-XI-File scenario

    Dear All,
    I am doing one scenario in which DELIVERY idoc is posted from R/3 to XI and then from XI that idoc is to be sent as flat file to one local folder.
    For this scenario, I have done all ALE settings and I am able to see the idoc in XI in cXML format.Now I want to sent it as flat file.
    Now, for doing this I created 2 BS & 2 TS. 1 BS & TS of type Third Party for receiver & 1 BS & TS are of type Web as ABAP for sender. Then I have created one namespace in IR. I have not created any DT, MT, MI, MM becoz the structure of source and target file are same. Now, I created one IM in which I specified specified Type as "ABAP Class" & Mapping program name as one of the Z function module as specified in one of the SAP Guides.
    Then in ID, I created 2 Parties ie. one for Sender & one for receiver. Sender is having a communication channel of type Idoc & receiver is having communication channel of type File. And thn further Receiver Agreement, Inetrface Determination, Sender Agreement & Receiver Agreement are configured.
    In my system there is one scenario already configured which is using Delivery idoc so I have used party in my scenario for both sender & receiver.
    Now, when I am sending the idoc from R/3, I am able to see cXML in SXMB_MONI but it is taking receiver as the one which is defined for the already existing scenario but not the receiver defined by me.
    Can anybody guide if I have followed the correct steps & where I am doing the error.
    Warm Regards,
    N.Jain

    Hi ,
    Plese refer the following blogs ,
    IDoc to File
    /people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
    You have to do all this settings mentioned in the docuemnt:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/sapR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized&
    Also can you check this weblogs on the same:
    /people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi
    /people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
    /people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi
    /people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
    Thanks ,
    Suvarna
    Award pts if  it helps .

  • How to suppress the Acknowledgement  Error in IDOC to File scenario?

    Hi -
    I got the status in SXMB_MONI as 'Processed Successfully' for the IDOC to File scenario but the Acknoledgement status throws an error saying 'Acknowledgement not possible'.
    I read one of the documents in the forums on how to suppress the acknowledgement using a table on R/3 side using IDXNOALE,
    i tried that option but i still get the 'Acknowledgement not possible' error.
    Is there any other way to suppress this error?
    Thanks,
    Tirumal

    Hi Tirumal,
    Receiver adapters that run on the Adapter Engine support system acknowledgments if they are requested by the sender. Acknowledgements are triggered when a message is successfully processed by the adapter or if an error occurs while it is being processed. Receiver adapters do not support application acknowledgments. The RNIF and CIDX adapters are exceptions to this rule, since they also support scenario-dependent application acknowledgments. Sender adapters of the Adapter Engine do not request any acknowledgments.
    This means, JDBC adapter does only send system acks, however IDoc adapter is requesting application acks. Therefore as mentioned by the previous poster, you have to disable acks for this scenario using report IDX_NOALE.
    Also go through these documents for any further help:
    http://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-how-to-guides/how to handle acknowledgments for idoc.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
    Regards,
    abhy

Maybe you are looking for

  • My (quite new) MBP's monitor looks a bit pinkish, and the black test goes red when I scroll.  Why?

    I said it all in the header.  All the screen components that usually look pale grey look a bit pinkish, and the inages and text discolor when I scrook.  This is especially noticeable with text, which goes from black to dark red and back to black when

  • Status Reports - Project Online 2013

    Hey folks, Does Project Online 2013 support Status Reports? On the PWA > Status Report page, I can not seem to find where I could click to add/ configure a status report. \Spiro Theopoulos PMP, MCITP. Montreal, QC (Canada)

  • Podcast Ranking in iTunes

    Can anyone tell me how podcasts are ranked in the iTunes store? For example, I enter in the term "Doctor Who Podcast" into the search box, and up pops a list. The list is ordered numerically, not by "popularity". There, my own podcast is listed as #7

  • How to call a javabean with more argumets?

    I've create a javabean with more arguments,i've used fbean.add_arg: arglist := FBean.Create_Arglist; FBean.add_arg(arglist,'c:\dev10\esdir.fmb'); FBean.add_arg(arglist,wdata); FBean.add_arg(arglist,wtime); wprova:=FBean.invoke_char('BEAN_IMAGE',1,'ge

  • Safari 5.0 Upgrade Slow and Lot of Hang-ups

    I'm new to the Discussion forum. I joined because of issues I'm having with Safari 5.0. I installed an auto upgrade to Safari 5.0 from ver. 4.0.5 yesterday. Immediately I started having problems with slow loading of web page, incompletely loaded web