IDoc to IDOC , Proxy to Proxy demo scenarios

Hi!
Can some one recommend some practical sdn-blogs/documentation for the demo XI scenarios such as:
IDoc_to_IDoc, Proxy_to_Proxy, etc.
I have a SAP ECC 6.0 ABAP system (IDES system with two business clients) and SAP PI.
Thank you very much!
regards
Holger

Hi
for proxi- to-proxi scenario's refer these links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/67/2edd3f597af206e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/f8/8ae03fc2269615e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/5d/2add3f597af206e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
and also refer these
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30ed7284-22e5-2910-0b85-bb39428e5ab3
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00de46da-8b8b-2a10-a1a0-c328b2034b5e
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/809a4f1a-f8cb-2a10-42bf-cf2338590d8b
hope this helps
regards,
surya

Similar Messages

IDOC - Proxy Scenario.

Hi..
I am doing MM-SUS Interface. i am thinking the Adapters are IDOC-->Proxy, If my understanding is wrong, pls correct me. Today at 9 am i am sending the PO Request from ECC -XI-SUS , i am getting the PO Confirmation from SUS-XI-ECC after 2 days. this scenario it will come to Synchronous Scenario (OR) Asynchronous Scenario. Pls suggest me
Regards,
Pasi.

Pasi ,
Help further extended...please check :
Re: MM-XI-SUS Integration
MM System - XI - SUS
MM-SUS XI configuration
MM-SUS cenario
Re: MM-SUS vendor replication error
R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error
Hope it helps !!
Regards,

Replacing IDoc - IDoc with IDoc - Proxy

Hi every one,
I have an <b>IDoc - IDoc</b> integration scenario between 4.5B and ECC 6.0 systems. The Idoc in the receiver system is not directly posted but an User - Exit is called and every thing is working fine.
I thought of experimenting replacing the scenario with Idoc - Proxy, and the source being 4.5B and target ECC. The User-Exit stuff as told above will taken care while implementing proxy.
Approach:
<b>I create an inbound interface object in IR and use the Idoc as the message type and generate a server proxy using SPROXY in the ABAP stack of XI.</b>
Please correct me. Also notify me if there are any potentials problems.
Regards,
-Naveen.

Hi,
SPROXY on the ECC system should be used to generate the ABAP proxy, not the XI system. Therefore, configurations will be required on the ECC system to point to the XI system in order to retrieve the interfaces to generate the ABAP proxy.
Also, it might be easier to create a simpler message type to use in the interface. IDOC has a quite complex structure and probably contains a lot of elements which will not be used by your proxy. The proxy interface should be as simple as possible to simplify your program development.
Regards,
Bill

ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration Scenarios with SAP DS for ESA v3

Hi,
we are planning two PoCs of Integration Plattforms. One of our major requirement set is SAP Integration into our existing SOA.
Because we also have R/3 4.7 Systems in production, we are planning to test ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios with these Integration Plattforms.
My question is:
We are looking for are smart solution to get a SAP Test Environment, where we can test ALE/IDOC und RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios.
It is possible to do this with SAP DS for ESA v3 or shall we better use IDES for that purpose?
Best regards,
Steven

Hi Abhishek,
This is our scenario. We are doing an integration of SAP HR r/3 system with the CRM system. We need housing information details of the employees which we have in custom infotype 9310 in SAP HR system and we need those details in the CRM system. So am planning out for an ALE/IDOC approach for the integration and gonna maintain the 9310 details in a custom table. In the CRM system, we gonna build a BOL layer for accessing the 9310 details. Also i'm preparing a HLD for this process. I wanna read and go through few same HLD's before i submit my proposal to my client. Please suggest me and help me out.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arunmozhi.

Acknowledgement for AsynThird-party-- SOAP-- PI-- ABAP proxy-- ECC scenario

Can someone please provide me a step-by-step for Third-party>SOAP>PI>ABAP proxy>ECC scenario.
Third-part system is sending an Asynchronous HTTPS message to PI which is then routed to the ECC system to do some processing. I have read many blong and all SAP Docu available on this subject, but i am still confused.
I understand that ABAP Proxies supports acknowledgement, but what needs to be done in the third-party system to be able to receive acknowledgements. Is there any special config. that needs to be done in Sender SOAP adapter?
What diff. needs to be done in ABAP proxy to be able to send acknowledgement messages, any config. in XI receiver adapter?
I will appreciate any guidance.
Thanks,
Saurabh

HI
Third party application need to have the synchronus communication enabled. If not then you need to get a wrapper develop for this kind of communication
For proxy development
Just go through these links:
How to create proxy.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/555f3c482a7331e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
ABAP Server Proxies (Inbound Proxy)
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/04/03/abap-server-proxies
OutBound Proxy (Client Proxy)
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/07/28/smarter-approach-for-coding-abap-proxies
Outbound Proxy (Client Proxy)
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy
How to Activate Proxy.
/people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
File to R/3 via ABAP Proxy with good example
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/14/file-to-r3-via-abap-proxy
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/48/d5a1fe5f317a4e8e35801ed2c88246/frameset.htm
Synchronous Proxies:
Outbound Synchronous Proxy
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/abap%2bproxy%2boutbound%2bprogram%2b-%2bpurchase%2border%2bsend
Inbound Synchronous Proxy
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/abap%2bproxy%2binbound%2bprogram%2b-%2bsales%2border%2bcreation

File to Proxy synchronous scenario

Experts,
I am working on a File to proxy synchronous scenario.
I am doing the content conversion at the sendre side by using java program as input structure is very complex so have to go fr java code. Its a txt file at sender side.
Once I read the file in XI, am doing a graphical mapping ( just one to one mapping) then using the server proxy , a service entry is getting created then response am sending to the receiver.
My question is , can I use graphical mapping as I am using a java class for content conversion? both in one scenario is possible?
I have developed a java code for content conversion and it is working fine. How to use this .jar file in XI?
Can Any one help me wz thsi one?
Thanks in Advance
Virendra

My question is , can I use graphical mapping as I am using a java class for content conversion?
You can use as long as the structure generatde by the JAVA program is same as the source-message structure of the message mapping.
I have developed a java code for content conversion and it is working fine. How to use this .jar file in XI?
In my opinion this should be the adapter module....as the conversion needs to be done in the channel and inclucing it as a mapping wont help.
Regards,
Abhishek.

SOAP to Proxy synchronous scenario

Hi,
Hope you are all doing well.
I have a SOAP to Proxy synchronous scenario. As part of this scenario, the data structure of the response sent by SAP is different from the response sent back to the SOAP requester. Hence I have used request message mapping between the SOAP request sent by requester and the one passed on to SAP and response message mapping between the response sent by SAP and the one passed on to the requester. Both the message mappings are incorporated in a single Interface mapping.
The problem is that the interface is behaving like a asynchronous one, i.e., request is passing over to SAP but though the proxy is giving a response back, the same is not coming over to XI.
It would be really helpful if you can let me know what might have gone wrong.
regards
Debansu

Hi,
you should have that:
1. Two Message Mapping:
1.1. a Message Mapping for request    (called MM_request)    , from MT_SOAP_request     to   MT_Proxy_request.
1.2. a Message Mapping for response (called MM_response) , from MT_Proxy_response   to   MT_SOAP_response.
2. One Operation Mapping (in PI 7.1) or Interface Mapping (in PI 7.0) from SI_SOAP to SI_ Proxy with:
2.1 in the tab "request", so from MT_SOAP_request     to   MT_Proxy_request    , give your Message Mapping "MM_request".
2.2 in tab "response"   , so from MT_Proxy_response   to   MT_SOAP_response, give your Message Mapping "MM_response".
3. In you Directory, you define a flow like that:
from SI_SOAP to SI_ Proxy by using your Operation Mapping.
If I missed nothing, that's all.
MT = Message Type
MM = Message Mapping
SI =Service Interface in PI 7.1 or Message Interface in PI 7.0.
regards.
Mickael
Edited by: Mickael Huchet on Oct 19, 2011 4:07 PM

SOAP - XI- PROXY synchronous scenario

Hi Experts,
I have a
SOAP -
XI -
PROXY Synchronous Scenario
I have done the following things ESR and ID
ESR:
1. Created DT and respective MT for Request and Response.
2. Created Service Interfaces with Synchronous mode with respective MT's.
3. Created Two separate MM with respective Request and Response MT's.
4. Created Operation Mapping and call both Request and Response Mappings in it.
Integration Directory (ID):
1. Configured considering Sender SOAP and Receiver ECC Services.
2. Configured CC with required parameters in Sender SOAP CC and Receiver XI CC.
3. Generate wsdl from Sender agreement and save it as a local file.
I am getting error in receiver agreement. Do I need to specify any Module parameters in Module TAB for Sender CC or Receiver CC to synchronous scenario.
Please hep me out.
Thanks

Hi Ram,
I am getting error in receiver agreement. Do I need to specify any Module parameters in Module TAB for Sender CC or Receiver CC to synchronous scenario.
It looks like you did not create a receiver agreement, or if you did, it did not match the interface that is given or configured in Interface Determination. Can you recheck your configuration?
Regards,
Mark

IS Mapping required in JDBC to PROXY asynchronous scenario?

Hi,
I am working on JDBC to PROXY asynchronous scenario. The scheduled stored procedure fetches the data from database tables and stores them in staging table in the same database. XI will fetch the records via JDBC adapter. Now these records are to be posted into SAP custom table via proxy without any transformation. Now is Message mapping and Interface mapping required in this case?

Hi
I assume that your source and traget structure will be different as you are using JDBC.
SO you will need to create message mapping and operation mapping.
-Deepak.

No receiver could be determined in Proxy----File Scenario

Hi All,
Iam doing Proxy---File scenario
Every thing i got success in SAP R/3 side MONI
I got this Error in XI side MONI as No receiver could be determined
I check the Sender Service in MONI--- SOAP Header ---Main( Both R/3 side & XI side also)
Here it is showing like sapdev as my sender service, but actually my sender Business system is Sub_Dev_ssd.
How to get it rectify
Regards
Vamsi

Hi Chirag & Santosh,
As i said the problem is when i check in XI side MONI
The sender service is showing sapdev BUT it shld be Sub_Dev_SSD which i have selected in the Receiver Determination Step also.
The same is showing in the SAP R/3 side MONI also
According to my understanding , The Correct Business system which is there in the SLD & which i want to use is not Picking in the SAP R/3 side and so thats why iam getting the Service as sapdev & the same sapdev Service is passing to XI also
I think the Business system from the SLD is Not comming into picture.
What to do for this??
Regards
Vamsi

Hi, In a IDOC --- XI(BPM)--- SOAP Sync Scenario failrure.

Hi, In an IDOC ->XI(BPM)->SOAP Sync Scenario I observed recently messages are failing in SXMB_MONI with an error as:
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: SOAP: response message contains an error XIAdapter/PARSING/ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION - soap fault: System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server did not recognize the value of HTTP Header SOAPAction: http://172.16.209.162/esdryrun/ContractData_Push. at System.Web.Services.Protocols.Soap11ServerProtocolHelper.RouteRequest() at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapServerProtocol.Initialize() at System.Web.Services.Protocols.ServerProtocol.SetContext(Type type, HttpContext context, HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response) at System.Web.Services.Protocols.ServerProtocolFactory.Create(Type type, HttpContext context, HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response, Boolean& abortProcessing)
friends, could u plz help on this.
Thanks,
satya.

Hello,
This indicates a configuration issue with this SOAP receiver adapter. Please check the on line help for the configuration of the SOAP adapter (the link is below). Please set the indicator in the "SOAP Action" field.
Configuring the Receiver SOAP Adapter
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/29/5bd93f130f9215e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
(Below is the extract from the link)
SOAP Action
Specify the SOAP action. The action specifies the value for the
SOAPAction in Web service messages; set the indicator.
Regards,
Sarah

Synchronous Proxy - SOAP Scenario (Error 500 in Response).

Hi
I've built a few Synchronous Proxy -> SOAP Scenarios,
with 'Do Not Use SOAP Envelope' option.
For two of them, I'm facing a common error.
The error is: ADAPTER.HTTP_EXCEPTION (HTTP 500 Internal Server Error).
When I paste the EXACTLY SAME payload picked up from XI, into the SOAP client, it works giving valid response.
Trying to figure out the issue.
R/3 System:
WAS 620 (Level 0041)
XI System:
PI 7.0 (Level 0007)
SOAP System:
BizRights (Approva) 3.0
Any help is appreciated.
Rajendra.

Hi,
Following SAP notes may help you- 804124, 807000
Regards,
Moorthy

Soap to proxy : sync scenario

Hi
Have a new PI 7.1 system , wanted to do a soap to proxy sync scenario
Do i need to create business system for proxies or if I just create 2 business services: one for sender and other for reciever ,it would suffice?
Is there any advantage / dsiadvantage if I use Business service instead of Business systems?
In SLD if I just create a product /swcv : it should be good if I want to use Business service mechanism instead of Business syste, ? or is creating Technical system and Business system mandatory even if I have to configure scnearios using Business service
Thnx

Business Systems require technical systems/software components and products, from an organisational perspective in PI it might be a good idea to define these things for an external entity (Business System). As far as Im aware business Services do not have that same requirment.
I tend to limit business service usage to one off or simple interaction B2B, as soon as you have more than one adapter interacting with the same external entity a business system with all of "their" adapters will help keep things clear to other people configuring integration scenario's. Whilst smart naming standard will get you around this most of the time, it makes more sense to put them together under the one system.
Hope this helps.

Proxy- JDBC Scenario

On running Proxy-> JDBC Scenario
i found out that no data is being passed through the Communication channel for this scenario ( but for another scenario also i am using the same communication channel, there it is passing the data ) but i can see the data in SXMB_MONI of XI.
Don't know where is the issue..?
Regards,

Hi Guys,
Finally i resolved ..
Since for the sender data type(and hence msg type,and also i was using that for proxy generation) i was not using the namespace but was using the namespace for receiver side..
At the time of message mapping message types were also mapped..but since no namespace was coming from Sender Message ..so it was throwing the error in RWB..
Hope it will help others also..
Regards,

Proxy Demo

Hi
I'm trying to build a proxy demo for a customer.
if I understand the architecture I need to install on the proxy server:
Messenger: Imap Proxy + Messenger
Web server
Communication Express
But do I need Access manager or Directory server on proxy?
Thanks

<snip>
to the internet is not good. It can't tell if the
message is addressed to a real user or not.Recipe
for a DOS attack. There are many other reasons not
to
expose this device to the internet.
Trend (and the other scanner folks) build great
scanners, but they are not experienced in building
great SMTP servers. We don't do scanners, but we
do
build a great MTA.
Uhmmm, I have to test. It seems better but add more
dificulty.Yes, it's slightly more difficult, but it's a lot better, especially if you have more than just a few users on your system.
I run a small system. I reject at connection time, all messages addressed to anybody other than my actual users. That's on the order of 90% of what comes my way. Imagine how much additional cpu,memory and disk I'd need to process all that, and send back DSN for each bad address. Imagine how many users outside my system would be unhappy getting blowback from messages with forged "from" addresses.
It's very important to only accept messages for users that you actually service. It's not just 'good practice', it's truly important, now.
Trend accepts anything you offer it. You need to insulate it from having to do that.
>
>>
IMAP: I try MMP and it works.
Communication express: This is my question.
MMP only act as proxy for mail or calendar to?Our UWC, also known as "communication express" runs
on a web server. It would normally sit behind a
standard web proxy, set up as a "reverse proxy",
and
communicate to the MEM on that same box. I realize
this is starting to get complex, but, until we get
the next version out, it's going to be complex.
I don't understand this part.
I have to install an standard web proxy and MEM? So
the final picture is a server with:
MMP (Imap)
MEM (web mail proxy typical 8080 port)
Apache proxy (port 80 redirect to internal UWC ??)It truly depends on what you're setting up.
If you want to use UWC, AND you have more than one store backend, then you need
the web server container with UWC installed on it.
MEM
You already need MMP for imap.
I think you need the MTA.
You may or may not have all this on one box. Big systems have it on many boxes.
None of us that regularly contribute to this forum are truly expert in architecting large systems. It might help us to help you if you gave us some idea of the scale of what you're trying to do.
>
'm so confused about that...
Do you now when 2006qX have to be released?I can't tell, exactly. It's due out sometime after the first of the year, subject to delays. It's in beta, now.
>
>>
>>>
How I will install MMP?You have already installed MMP, if you proxy IMAP.
My mistake, I was talking about MEMYes, as I said abov e, you'll likely need MEM.
>
>
>>
Thanks

IDoc to IDOC , Proxy to Proxy demo scenarios

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for