Idocs are not equal to XML message generated

hi ,
i am facing problem when i using XI.its not generated idocs equal to XML message generated.

idocs equal to XML message
Do u mean that in ur file to idoc scenario, the no of messages sent by file is not equal to no of idocs generated? If yes, then first check in tcode sxmb_moni at XI for presence of message and check for error there
Please describe ur scenario a bit.
Regards,
Prateek

Similar Messages

Outbound Idocs are not generated for some material number MATNR

Hi all,
We are using a custom program to process the IDOCS to some other thirdparty systems.
but the problem is the IDOCS are not generated and also we can't find the IDocs in TRFC also.
But it is working for the other matnr.
I have already debug the custom program, and it is taking all the inputs correctly.
plz guide me guys

Hi Praveen,
This is the code I am using
LOOP AT GS-MATNR_WERKS ASSIGNING <MATNR_WERKS>
GS-COUNT = GS-COUNT + 1.
    GS-TEXT = 'IDOC for Material & & (& of &) is just being created'(001).
    REPLACE '&' WITH <MATNR_WERKS>-MATNR INTO GS-TEXT.
    REPLACE '&' WITH <MATNR_WERKS>-WERKS INTO GS-TEXT.
    REPLACE '&' WITH GS-COUNT            INTO GS-TEXT.
    REPLACE '&' WITH GS-LINES            INTO GS-TEXT.
    CONDENSE GS-TEXT.
    CALL FUNCTION 'SAPGUI_PROGRESS_INDICATOR'
         EXPORTING
              TEXT = GS-TEXT
validation code for the MATNR & WEKRS
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_MASTERIDOC_DISTRIB_ZCOPEBOM'
         EXPORTING
              MATNR        = <MATNR_WERKS>-MATNR
              WERKS        = <MATNR_WERKS>-WERKS
              MESSAGE_TYPE = P_MESTYP
GS-CREATED = GS-CREATED + 1.
    GS-COMMIT = GS-COMMIT + 1.
    IF GS-COMMIT >= 100.
      GS-COMMIT = 0.
      COMMIT WORK.
    ENDIF

How to correlate a specific Idoc and a specific XI xml message

Hi, I have an Idoc and want to find the belonging xml message in XI. There are more than 90 xml messages to pick from, so I hope there are some other methods to find it, instead of looking inside each one!
Thanks!

Hi Rune,
for that task you have to extend the standard monitoring. Plz have a look at <a href="/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/02/14/super-message-monitor-for-sap-xi Message Monitor for SAP XI</a>
Regards,
Udo
Message was edited by: Udo Martens

Buffer Sizes Are Not Equal

Okay what does this term mean:
Buffer Sizes Are Not Equal
I am playing with transitions. I have two clips with enough handles.
I'm using the gradient wipe and putting a Photoshop file in the "well".
That message pops up in the timeline when I'm stopped at that place in the timeline (similar to the media offline message). When I try to render the effect, the same message appears and doesn't even attempt to render.
FCP 5.1.4

The image is RGB...
The image itself is a blue circle over a transparent background. That's the only layer.
I did change it to a jpg file, and I stopped getting the error message...but obviously I also lost the alpha channel.
John

IDocs are not transfering to XI

Hi,
When we create Shopping cart, in the back PO will create and it woould convert to IDoc and send to XI. But PO's are creating, IDocs are not reaching to XI, please let me know what would be the issue.
Thanks

HI,
Try this URL , i hope it will help u ,
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c09b775e-e56e-2910-1187-d8eba09c7a4a?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Regards,
S.Saravana

Idocs are not processed in the right order.

Hi,
I face a problem that when there are a large number of IDocs (Inbound) posted the Idocs are not processed in the right order.
Msg type: MBGMCR
any idea how this can happen?
what is the solution?
br
Karen

No answer

In system settings 15 item are not accessible, get the message: cannot open it, is not possible on intel based MAC. Items like security, i cloud user and groups network and more

in system settings 15 item are not accessible, get the message: cannot open it, is not possible on intel based MAC. Items like security, iCloud user and groups network and more.
Genius bar told me to erase the harddisk and install OSX Maverick again. This has not changed the problems with the system settings

You need to Repartition the drive as One partition which will erase all data from it and then reinstall OS X. then with the initial setup system you chose the language on the first screen that comes up. That sets the language for the whole system.
There is no other way of completely removing certain information created by a previous owner. this hold strue whether you are selling or give a Mac to someone.
To do the repartitioning you need to use the Online Internet Recovery system, if the Mac came with Lion 10.7 or above, or from the original system reinstall discs that came with it when it was new.

Margins are not equal.

I am on my third Xerox. This one is a refurb 8560. It produces really nice color and all that.But it does not center the margins on the pictures I've printed.Margin errors occur in both Tray 1 and Tray 2.I set the canvas to 5 X7 and the item to a lesser size.But both the top and side margins are not equal.The same thing happens with larger paper (8.5x11) in Tray 2.My previous Xerox which was a Laser with toner never had that problem.I'm using Photoshop CS5.I'd appreciate any advice.Thanks.

I did do the firmware upgrade.I realized that the answer to the margins, at least for simple things, is not to create margins in PhotoShop. If I just make the picture the size I want it centers fine. I do have another question.Assume I print a picture on Xerox Glossy paper and have it framed behind glass.A picture on Epson Glossy printed with an Epson Ink Jet claims 200 years.But I haven't seen the equivalent for any Xerox. I spoke to someone at Xerox some years ago when I had a color laser and I was told that there were too many kinds of paper that could be used. So they did not test it. I have a high end Epson but it is a pain to use and it is slow. I find using the Xerox printers are faster and I don't have to deal with icc profiles.

XML Messages generated by XI using namespace aliases...

I have a question regarding the XML messages that are generated by XI as part of the mapping, etc.
I receive e.g. the following XML document in the payload of my message sent to a legacy system:
<ns1:ArticleRequest xmlns:ns1="http://www.basis.ko.com/XMLSchemas/ArticleRequest/2.0" function="retrieve">
     <ns1:ArticleNumber>109</ns1:ArticleNumber>
</ns1:ArticleRequest>
Unfortunately the system cannot handle the ns1: prefixes correctly and would prefer if the XML message were using the default namespace.
Can XI be configured to produce the XML using the default namespace (in case the interface has just one namespace this should be semantically identical)
<ArticleRequest xmlns="http://www.basis.ko.com/XMLSchemas/ArticleRequest/2.0" function="retrieve">
     <ArticleNumber>109</ArticleNumber>
</ArticleRequest>
and furthermore, is there a way to include the xsi:schemaLocation attribute in the resulting XML document?
like this:
<ArticleRequest xmlns:ns1="http://www.basis.ko.com/XMLSchemas/ArticleRequest/2.0" function="retrieve" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.basis.ko.com/XMLSchemas/ArticleRequest/2.0 ArticleRequest.xsd" >
     <ArticleNumber>109</ArticleNumber>
</ArticleRequest>
kind regards for your help,
Peter

Hi Udo,
I'm not sure how the XSL Mapping can remove the namespace alias and exchange it with default namespace. The xsl:copy-of just does a duplication of the selected node. Do you have any additional input on this one?
Regarding the second hint, 'manipulate the field XML namespace in the message type', I could not find a place where to do this - as I am using 'External Definition' (XSDs imported into XI). Still when I change the namespace I will always receive the prefix in front of each element.
Any additional help is highly appreciated.
regards,
Peter

Two idocs are created for one output message type

hi all,
we are communicating our sap idocs to external system using ALE.It is working smoothly.
Our problem raises here,
.idocs are creating at the time of output type attachment for purchase orders.But rarely,two idocs are creating for one message type.It means two idocs are created for same Purchase order.It makes complications for the external system.
anyone can help me pls?
thnks in advance..........

thanks jurgen for ur reply,
jurgen, the second idoc is not an "ORDCHG",It is the replica of first idoc.This one has also "ORDERS" message type.The only difference between these idocs are the time.It means the difference between the time field segments of these idocs have only three(3)seconds difference.We think that its from the system error.If it is not from the system error pls give me the explanation.
thanks in advance.......

Outbound IDocs are not visuible in Middleware system(SeeBeyond)

Hi Experts,
We need need your expertise help on this issue.
Issue:
The Outbound IDocs which are in status 12 in SAP system are not visuible in Middleware system(SeeBeyond) for customized message type( forecast -ZFOSHT)
If we create a IDoc by using customized program, IDoc(eg.0000000012345678) is successfully created and the status of IDoc is 12. but not visible in Seebeyond.
but If we are re sending the same IDoc(0000000012345678) through WE19(IDoc creation) without changing any thing,the newely created IDoc reached to the Seebeyond.
Please look the issue and help me on this.
Raghavendrarao.R
+91 9739006564

Hi,
After your Function module for IDoc creation either it is Z function module or standard one "MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE" write these
CALL FUNCTION 'DB_COMMIT'.
CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_ALL'.
COMMIT WORK.
This should solve your problem.

Why IDocs are not arrived from Source System

Hi all,
Now a days we are facing regular problem to load master data?
We are getting Error Message - "No Idocs arrived from the Source system".
I need to know, Why this error will be occurred?
Is there any reason for this Docs are not arrived from the Source System?
Please help me to analyze this error, why its happened regularly? what could be possible reasons for this error?
Its very urgent, please help me as early as possible.
Thanks in Advance. I will asign the points for relevent answers.
Regards,
Sudharsan Reddy.

Hi ,
SOME OF THE CHECKS:
1.You can check the RFC destination using the transaction SM59 in the system. Then do Test connection and this should not cross more than 1000ms. The connection should establish within 1000ms.
If it crosses more than 1000ms the tRFC entries will not be cleared fast.There will not be any job to push Transaction recorded entries it will go through SMD(Shared Master Data) Tool.
So if it crossed more than 1000ms, then you can ask your Basis team to check the network connectivity b/w R/3 and BW system.
If there is no serialization for these IDocs then you can use button F6 to process these entries in tRFC manually.
2.Go to SM58 and check the LUW .If any error ..then selecting the failed Idoc, click edit in the menu and execute LUW.
3.If there are many Idocs with status red then check the system performance also. If performance os the system is bad then, we can put the mail to basis guys they will check and restart the BW system. (or) it may be due to problem in the coding,since data transfer is taking long time.
4. Some times it may be due to much parallel process at the info package level and make the Max parallel process into one process in RSCUSTV6, save and run the infopackage. This may be due to space problem.
( Or )sbiw>general settings>maintain control parameters for data transfer. Both in BW and R/3 we configure in the same way.
There we need to give
1.source Sys name
2.Maximum KB in one data package.
3.Maximum lines in one data package.
4. Frequency (specifies after how many no. of data records, status record should be sent)
5. Max processes ---Reduce the number process, save and try.
6.Target Sys name.
Regards,
Dhanya.

Ticking the 'portal vendor' in SRM not triggering the XML message in SRM?

Dear experts,
I have ticked the 'portal vendor' in the supplier master data in SRM.
I have maintained the output medium as 'XML\XI'.
The 'permit surrogate bidding' button is unticked.
Then, I have saved the supplier master data successfully.
Still no XML message is generated for the supplier transfer to PI in the transaction SXMB_MONI.
Could you please comment what things I should look for?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Dear Nikhil/Soumyaprakash,
The XML message was not generated from the SRM system due to missing config details in the 'define system landscape directory' in the SRM system.
Now, The SRM system is generating the XML message for supplier transfer. The PI system is successfully processing the messages. On the receiver side, the SUS system is also successfully processing the message.
However, no supplier is created under the root vendor organization in SUS system. No mail is also triggered. I have also maintained the vendor and porg details in the table 'BBP_MARKETP_INFO'.
Could you please check if anything is needed to trigger the creation of vendor record in SUS?
Thanks in advance,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Some sent mails do not appear/are not saved in "sent messages" and are lost

i work with mail and 4 different imap accounts. about every 15th sent email "gets lost". i.e. i can follow the sending process in the activity window, and i hear the sending confirmation tone. and, usually, the mails even reach the receiver. BUT, the mails do not appear/are not saved in the "sent messages" folder and are lost. this is very unsettling, as there seems to be no recognizable pattern. can anyone help, or should i change to "entourage"? big thanks for replies
Message was edited by: Bassolino

Hi Bassolino and David,
I, too, have had this intermittent issue and wonder if you had found a solution?
In the past 3 weeks, two messages have been sent from my mac mail account, using the mail application (the only apparent common factor being that both messages had iphoto attachments), the recipients have received them - only I do not have a copy in my 'sent' folder.
They are not stored on the macintosh server either...
I have not altered any settings and this intermittent issue has just emerged.
Any help from 'Top Users' would be welcome. Thanks.

Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor, Message no. 8I565;

Hi Gurus,
We have up-graded system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, Now encountering following error while capturing Excise at MIGO.
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565;
Kindly suggest a solution for the above error.
Best regards
Naveen D'Souza

Hello ,
Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565
The above given error is common while MIGO while capture of excise invoice. The above written guys are correct, please check J1ID for that Vendor,
1) if after maintening also , suppose you get the above error while MIGO, then select "Only Part1" option in MIGO , and press Check Button, if error goes,
then again go back and select "Capture excise invoice", then system will not give you the above error while Capture of excise invoice in MIGO.
Please check some SAPOSS notes also.
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Idocs are not equal to XML message generated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for