Images Rotated 90 Degrees on prints

i am having this issue with the Apple version of Adobe Illustrator CS3. We just got a new printer (Sharp MX-3501N) and it has a Fiery 2 print server on it. When i print illustrator documents to it, the first page comes out great. Comes out landscape on 11x17 paper. But if i tell it i want any more then just one print (2 or more copies) the first page comes out fine, each additional page comes out with the image rotated 90 degrees and is printed right off the page and leaves a blank space on the bottom of the page. Adobe is updated, MacOS (10.5) is updated, i have tried printing from other programs and everything else prints fine, and i have updated the drivers.
I am an authorized sharp service center and i talked to Sharp technician support about it and they said that because Adobe handles the print job from start to finish, there is likely a setting in illustrator that is messed up. Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?

I'm not sure if I understand your problem. If it uses a proper PS RIP, the rasterized version will be stored in it and it should initiate printing multiple copies, not the computer that sends over the PS/ PDF data. Are you sure you're not missing out on some silly check mark somewhere in teh printer driver? what you describe strikes me more as an "only print first page differently/ print cover sheet" option as you would use them in an office program. Is Illustrator actually set to handle the print job (which would be kinda pointless on a hardware RIP)? If so, you should get this odd behavior with other printer drivers as well (PDF document printer etc.) and then indeed it would be the program's fault...
Mylenium

Similar Messages

Rotate image X degrees on WM5

Hello,
I'm creating a programs for a PPC running WM5. The program needs to be able to rotate an image X degrees. But until now I didn't find much that I can use.
On a desktop you've got the Advanced graphics and awt.geom. But I can't seem to find anything that�s CDC (with PP) compatible.
I found one tread of someone that did it manual, but it has two disadvantages: 1: It's to slow | 2 it doesn't fill empty spots that are generated by rotating an image.
The tread:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=80&threadID=754901
Does anyone know a solution of how to do this correctly?

1: It's to slowThat's completely unoptimised code. I would estimate that with some effort it can be made at least 10 times faster, if not 100.
2 it doesn't fill empty spots that are generated by rotating an image. What do you mean?
Edit: Oh, I get it. Yes, the first change I'd make to that code is to iterate over destination pixels rather than source pixels.

How to calculate the rotation degree of tick marks

Hello Again,
Thanks to so much help that I received here, I've been able to move right along in learning how to perform my job digitally instead of with an old camera.
In my last discussion, I learned out to make the tick marks using copies and rotation. My question now is, how is the rotation calculated so A) I get the correct placement of the tick marks, especially the small ones as there are so many and B) how do I calculate the rotation degree so that I have the proper amount of space at the bottom of the guage/dial?
Here is an image to help show what I'm asking:
I know how to get the large tick marks and the small tick marks, if I were placing them evenly around the entire circle, I would know how to do that also - but since I'm placing them around only a portion of the circle (although still evenly) I'm lost. I can only figure out the space by hit and miss calculations and that is taking much too long. I would also need to know how much to rotate the entire thing by in order to get the open space at the bottom as shown.
thanks for your help!

You need to use transform effects and you can get this in about 10 or so minutes.
first you need to set up the objects.
the thick lines I used effect>distort and transform>transform 20 copies angle 14
thi ones 100 copies angle 2,8
G

How can I make a user imported image rotate on a control?

I am trying to import a graphic to use in place of the needle on an indicator. When i do this, however, the image does not rotate, it merely moves around while maintaining its original orientation.
Is there a way that I can import my own image into a control or indicator, and have it rotate (pivot around some center) when given a numerical input, such as 0 to 360 degrees?

Hi Kevin12345,
I do know of a way to import an image to control... and have it rotate.
Depending on the complexity of your image, a picture control may be usefull.
The Robot arm example demonstrates how an angle can be used to control an image. If the image you are trying to import to complex to code, this may not be viable.
If you can be happy with a reduce resolution (i.e. interger degree steps only) you could use your favorite image edit app to rotate the image one degree at a time, and then import each image into a picture ring.
All of these work-arounds lack scaling.
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Image Rotation Option in EXPORT

I would like to see the EXPORT function have the ability to optionally rotate an image 90 degrees or -90 degrees if the image is the user's choice of either landscape or portrait orientation.
I frequently use Lightroom to create a gallery of pictures that is then sent over to my iPad. If landscape orientation images are mixed in with portrait, they are shown on the iPad rotated 90 degrees and only take up a fraction of the screen. Therefore my preference is to rotate all landscape images 90 degrees so that everything is the same orientation, then lock the orientation on the iPad to portrait mode. Then the images will use the entire screen.
Currently I have to manually rotate the images prior to export, do the export, and then rotate them back. It's a PITA and I would much rather check off a box in the EXPORT dialog and have it do the rotation automatically as required.

Rob,
I appreciate the suggestion, but it would not work as-is because not all images are in need of the rotation. I only need to rotate landscape images. Doing it after the fact would require either that I separarate the landscape images manually or that the post-processing tool (exiftool) is capable of detecting them and conditionally acting on them only.
Currently, the way I do it is like this: first I use a SmartCollection to isolate the landscape images and then apply a "Landscape" tag to identify them.
Then I create another smart collection for the "Landscape" tag so that I can do "SELECT ALL" and rotate everything.
Then I export everything, go back to the smart collection, and undo the rotation.
The main reason this is a pain is because the group of images I want to export might be based on a smart collection in the first place, and may have some combination of PICK, Rating, COLOR, or various keywords. To create the smart collection for making the tag, I have to replicate all that first then add the condition for detecting landscape images.
If you could create smart collections that inherited from other smart collections it would be much easier, and in fact that's another feature suggestion worth making.
I was not familiar with exiftool but I just found the website and it seems that it can probably do the conditional processing... I may give it a try, but I still think the rotation would be so much easier as a built-in export option.

Image Rotation Problem in LR 3.2RC

Anyone else having an issue with image rotation in Lightroom 3.2C?
Here's what happens:
I import images from my card. There are a combination of images taken horizontally and vertically. The vertical images come in sideways (horizontally). This is no big deal: maybe the cameras I was using in this case (Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic GF1) don't properly mark the orientation.
So, in Grid view, I select one of the improperly orientated images and click the "Rotate Photo Left" arrow in the toolbar. Here's where it gets weird. Instead of rotating the image 90-degrees counter clockwise, the thumbnail rotates about 45-degrees, so now it's crooked in Grid view. However, on my second monitor, the image now looks properly orientated.
I've tried rotating using the menu (Photo menu / Rotate Left) and got the same result. If I repeatedly rotate, it ends up in all sorts of odd positions in grid mode.
What's up with this? Is it just me?
Alan
PhotoCitizen.com

Restarted Lightroom and all looks good now. I'll be interested to see if the problem returns next time I import images.
UPDATE: I spoke too soon. Closed LR3 and opened it again. No, the cockeyed thumbnails are not saved at their odd angles. But they still don't match the image shown on my 2nd monitor (or on my main monitor either if I go to Loupe View). The Grid view image might show the vertical image lying on its side (horizontal), even though the 2nd monitor shows it in the correct orientation.
This happens with horizontal images too if I try to rotate them - something I tried just now but wouldn't normally need to do.
Trying to rotate the thumbnail again results in the cockeyed thumbnail. If I then CLICK on that thumbnail, it straightens out, but never in the correct orientation. Here's a screen grab:
Something seriously wrong here. Something that NEVER happend in Lightroom 3 until I installed version 3.2RC. So, I doubt that it's a video card problem - looks like a bug to me.
Alan
PhotoCitizen.com

Aperture image rotation

HI, I am new to macs and aperture and usually use photoshop.
Can anyone tell me how to rotate a picture by anything other than 90 degrees? I'm probably just not looking in the right place, in ps it was under image-rotate-custom. Also I cant find this in iphoto, but maybe you can only do the basics in that.
Many thanks, Tim

Its complicated. I do need to do this to around 50 pics.
I just got married, and my sister set up a photo both at the venue for people to take pictures of themselves with a remote camera. They had props and a frame to frame themselves. It sounds weird but we got some great pictures. The only thing is most people held the frame a funny angle, (quite a few at around 45 degrees) and I want to crop to just the frame and straighten it.
Its not a problem because I can do it quite easily in photoshop elements, just downloaded a trial for that too. I was just trying the decide between the two anyway, but liked the look of aperture.

Images rotated .

Using Photoshop Elements 10 with Windows 8.1, slide shows assembled in Photoshop Elements 10 and sent to Premier Elements 10 result in some of the images rotated through 90 degrees and being unable to correct them. Using another computer with Windows Vista and the same images every thing works ok. Can anyone help me correct this.
Many thanks.

Solved my own problem. Nuked the Aperture preferences and everything seems to be working now.

Help please: Action for arbitrary image rotation: 300 different files, each at a different angle

Hi everyone,
I have some 300 images, all handheld shots done in an on-location studio set. They all need varying amounts of image rotation since they're handheld. There's a beaded curtain in the background, so manually I use the ruler tool, draw a line along a strand of beads, and then image/rotate/arbitrary.
I need to create an action that will (1) do the arbitrary rotation and then (2) save and close the file.
However, when I record this, the value of the rotation of the sample file I'm working is what gets recorded (not surprising). In other words, if image A needs 0.28 degrees of rotation, that's not what I want for image B which might need -0.15 degrees instead. The action recorded 0.28.
Is there a way to create an action that will simply rotate according to the ruler once I've drawn it?
Thanks!
Jerry

True - and I am a keyboard shortcut dude. But got it working (I was impressed that using the mouse to unclick the last step in the history worked...), and things are doing what I needed.
And I'm hoping that my suggestion of the last-step undo will make CS5 on par with CS6 in this one small aspect, and perhaps help someone else...
Many thanks to you!!!
BTW - all in the FWIW - you can see what our work as photographers looks like here:
http://www.jerryandloisphotography.com.
If you are at all into music/rock 'n roll, you'll probably have fun on our music/stage gallery. Groups like YES, Heart, Thomas Dolby, etc. use a bit of our work - just a bit of fun...
Again - thanks and best wishes,
Jerry

Image rotated will not rotate back to original orientation

I'm using Adobe Ideas v2.7 on an iPad 3. I rotated my iPad to erase a line. My image rotated 90 degrees clockwise. It will not rotate back to the correct position no matter how I turn my device.
I have quit the app, I have shut off and restarted the device. The image will not rotate back to the correct orientation.
How do I rotate it back 90 degrees counter clockwise?
Thank you

I've had this same problem which I cound not fix ... until using probably the thing that caused the problem. I fixed it tonight this way:
- start up Adobe Idea
- rotate the iPad to the opposite you normally use when you start the projects ... For example I always use the app as a portrate setting, so I rotated to landscape
- open your project that is badly rotated when it normally loads
- rotate back to your correct rotation ... Portrate for me
- save and go back to start screen.
You should see it it back to where was before. Tonight I tried lots of things and finally got this to work.
-Randy

Loss of sharpness upon image rotation: Aperture vs. other software

I have carefully studied the resulting loss of sharpness upon rotation/straightening of images. This topic does not apply to 90/180 degree rotations.
When any image is rotated (be it JPEG or uncompressed), there will be a slight loss of quality (seen as a loss of sharpness) due to interpolation. The method of interpolation applied will affect the degree of quality degradation.
Simply put, professional applications such as Adobe Photoshop and even Adobe Lightroom use superior interpolation methods when performing rotations (and who knows, perhaps for other transformations/scalings also?!). Apple Aperture, on the other hand, uses an interpolation method that renders a loss of image sharpness on par with inferior consumer-level software such as Google Picasa or iView Media Pro. Yes, folks, here's a clear reason to select Adobe Lightroom over Apple Aperture.
Please take a close look at the comparison yourself:
http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/iWeb/Homepage/Sharpness.jpg
Make sure you are viewing the image I have posted at 100%, not scaled, in order to clearly see the inferior quality of images rotated with Aperture & Picasa.
Apple needs to address this problem by implementing a better interpolation algorithm with its straighten tool. It is sad that we are using and paying for a 'Professional' application that yields results on par with FREE software such as Google Picasa.
As much as I like Aperture for its other features/integration into Mac OS X, I am switching to Lightroom as of now. Straightening/rotating images is an absolute must, used by every photographer on a daily basis. The loss of image quality, therefore, is unacceptable.
Please post to this thread if you have experienced the same problem or are simply concerned over this. The more people that show concern, hopefully, the more likely Apple is willing to do something about this ASAP.

Surely any rotation (apart from the 90/180/270 ones) is by-definition a smoothing operation ? You have to take the values from adjacent pixels and combine them based on the rotation, then average (or use a point-spread function) them to rescale the values back into range.
Looks to me as though the Adobe products are just applying a sharpen operation immediately after the rotation, whereas Aperture isn't. Or Aperture could be using a simple average of the values, where Adobe is doing a gaussian summation-of-components or something similar.
My guess would be that they "do a quick sharpen", otherwise it would take longer to do the rotate. The only way you'll ever know is if the developers tell you though...
-=C=-

Image rotation with fade effect

I am new to the spry framework and have just started going
through the examples to see if I could create an image rotator that
fades the images into each other when changing. I have taken
snippets from different places to do this and think I have the
answer but really wanted some feedback to sanity check and let me
know if this is the best way of doing it. If it is, then I hope
others will find it useful.
Here is the url to the example:
Image
rotation example
And here is the code:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
Transitional//EN"
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xmlns:spry="
http://ns.adobe.com/spry">
<head>
<title>Sample Image Rotation</title>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1" />
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"
content="IE=7;FF=3;OtherUA=4" />
<meta name="author" content="www.baytree-cs.com - Peter
Barkway"/>
<meta name="copyright" content="(C)2006 Baytree Computer
Services, All right reserved."/>
<meta name="abstract" content="ISM Homepage" />
<meta name="description" content="ISM Homepage" />
<meta name="keywords" content="ISM Homepage"/>
<meta name="robots" content="all,index,follow"/>
<meta name="distribution" content="global"/>
<meta name="mssmarttagspreventparsing"
content="true"/>
<meta name="rating" content="general"/>
<style type="text/css">
.element{
float:left;
position: relative;
width: 350px;
text-align: center;
#display{
opacity: 0;
filter: alpha(opacity=0);
#animate{
left: -350px;
opacity: 1;
filter: alpha(opacity=100);
</style>
</head>
<body>
<noscript><h1>This page requires JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser and reload this
page.</h1></noscript>
<div id="container">
<div id="display" class="element"
spry:detailregion="dsImg"><img src="<?php echo
$rootDir.$baseDir;?>/{@base}{@path}"/></div>
<div id="animate" class="element"
spry:detailregion="dsImg2"><img src="<?php echo
$rootDir.$baseDir;?>/{@base}{@path}"/></div>
<p class="clear"></p>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="js/xpath.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="js/SpryData.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="js/SpryEffects.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var dsGalleries = new Spry.Data.XMLDataSet("spry.php",
"galleries/gallery", { method: "POST", postData:
"c=1&d=<?php echo $baseDir;?>", headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8"
var dsImg = new Spry.Data.XMLDataSet("spry.php",
"gallery/photos/photo", { method: "POST", postData:
"c=2&d=<?php echo
$baseDir;?>/{dsGalleries::@base}&s={dsGalleries::sitename}",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded;
charset=UTF-8" } });
var dsImg2 = new Spry.Data.XMLDataSet("spry.php",
"gallery/photos/photo", { method: "POST", postData:
"c=2&d=<?php echo
$baseDir;?>/{dsGalleries::@base}&s={dsGalleries::sitename}",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded;
charset=UTF-8" } });
var imageInterval = 8000; // 8 seconds
var imageFadeInterval = 4000; // 4 seconds
var image2Loaded = null;
var effect = new Spry.Effect.Fade('animate', {from: 100, to:
0, toggle: true, duration: imageFadeInterval});
// Prepare an observer that will change the opacity of the
initially
// hidden element in oposition with the initially visible
element
var obs1 = new Object;
// On each effect step we calculate the complementary
opacity for the other image container.
obs1.onStep = function(ef){
if (typeof otherEl == 'undefined')
otherEl = document.getElementById('display');
var opacity = 0;
if(/MSIE/.test(navigator.userAgent)){
opacity = Spry.Effect.getStyleProp(ef.element,
'filter').replace(/alpha$opacity([0-9]{1,3})$/, '$1');
otherEl.style.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + parseInt(100 * (1
- opacity), 10) + ")";
}else{
opacity = Spry.Effect.getStyleProp(ef.element, 'opacity');
otherEl.style.opacity = (1 - opacity);
// Attach the observer to the Fade effect
effect.addObserver(obs1);
function fadeInContent() {
// 1st time in so set the current rows so that the 'animate'
set is 1 ahead of the 'display' set
if(image2Loaded == null) {
dsImg.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 1)
% dsImg.getData().length);
dsImg2.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 2)
% dsImg.getData().length);
image2Loaded = 0;
} else {
if(image2Loaded) {
dsImg.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 1)
% dsImg.getData().length);
image2Loaded = 0;
} else {
dsImg2.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 1)
% dsImg.getData().length);
image2Loaded = 1;
effect.start();
var obs2 = {
onPostLoad: function() {
setInterval("fadeInContent()", imageInterval);
dsImg.addObserver(obs2);
</script>
</body>
</html>

I think that I might have got this going now. Here is the
code if anyone wants to use it.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
Transitional//EN"
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xmlns:spry="
http://ns.adobe.com/spry">
<head>
<title>Sample Image Rotation</title>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1" />
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"
content="IE=7;FF=3;OtherUA=4" />
<meta name="author" content="www.baytree-cs.com - Peter
Barkway"/>
<meta name="copyright" content="(C)2006 Baytree Computer
Services, All right reserved."/>
<meta name="abstract" content="ISM Homepage" />
<meta name="description" content="ISM Homepage" />
<meta name="keywords" content="ISM Homepage"/>
<meta name="robots" content="all,index,follow"/>
<meta name="distribution" content="global"/>
<meta name="mssmarttagspreventparsing"
content="true"/>
<meta name="rating" content="general"/>
<style type="text/css">
.element{
float:left;
position: relative;
width: 350px;
text-align: center;
#display{
opacity: 0;
filter: alpha(opacity=0);
#animate{
left: -350px;
opacity: 1;
filter: alpha(opacity=100);
</style>
</head>
<body>
<noscript><h1>This page requires JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser and reload this
page.</h1></noscript>
<div id="container">
<div id="display" class="element"
spry:detailregion="dsImg"><img src="<?php echo
$rootDir.$baseDir;?>/{@path}"/></div>
<div id="animate" class="element"
spry:detailregion="dsImg2"><img src="<?php echo
$rootDir.$baseDir;?>/{@path}"/></div>
<p class="clear"></p>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="js/xpath.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="js/SpryData.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="js/SpryEffects.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var dsGalleries = new Spry.Data.XMLDataSet("spry.php",
"galleries/gallery", { method: "POST", postData:
"c=1&d=<?php echo $baseDir;?>", headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8"
var dsImg = new Spry.Data.XMLDataSet("spry.php",
"gallery/photos/photo", { method: "POST", postData:
"c=2&d=<?php echo
$baseDir;?>/{dsGalleries::@base}&s={dsGalleries::sitename}",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded;
charset=UTF-8" } });
var dsImg2 = new Spry.Data.XMLDataSet("spry.php",
"gallery/photos/photo", { method: "POST", postData:
"c=2&d=<?php echo
$baseDir;?>/{dsGalleries::@base}&s={dsGalleries::sitename}",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded;
charset=UTF-8" } });
var imageInterval = 4000; // 8 seconds
var imageFadeInterval = 2000; // 4 seconds
var effect = new Spry.Effect.Fade('animate', {from: 100, to:
0, toggle: true, duration: imageFadeInterval});
// Prepare an observer that will change the opacity of the
initially
// hidden element in oposition with the initially visible
element
var obs1 = new Object;
// On each effect step we calculate the complementary
opacity for the other image container.
obs1.onStep = function(ef){
if (typeof otherEl == 'undefined')
otherEl = document.getElementById('display');
var opacity = 0;
if(/MSIE/.test(navigator.userAgent)){
opacity = Spry.Effect.getStyleProp(ef.element,
'filter').replace(/alpha$opacity([0-9]{1,3})$/, '$1');
otherEl.style.filter = "alpha(opacity=" + parseInt(100 * (1
- opacity), 10) + ")";
}else{
opacity = Spry.Effect.getStyleProp(ef.element, 'opacity');
otherEl.style.opacity = (1 - opacity);
// Attach the observer to the Fade effect
effect.addObserver(obs1);
function fadeInContent() {
// 1st time in so set the current rows so that the 'animate'
set is 1 ahead of the 'display' set
//use this flag to avoid the effect running on load
if (typeof image2Loaded == 'undefined') {
dsImg.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 1)
% dsImg.getData().length);
dsImg2.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 2)
% dsImg.getData().length);
var curRow = dsImg.getCurrentRow();
image2Loaded = 0;
} else {
if(image2Loaded) {
var img = document.getElementById('display');
dsImg.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 1)
% dsImg.getData().length);
var curRow = dsImg.getCurrentRow();
image2Loaded = 0;
} else {
var img = document.getElementById('animate');
dsImg2.setCurrentRowNumber((dsImg.getCurrentRowNumber() + 1)
% dsImg.getData().length);
var curRow = dsImg2.getCurrentRow();
image2Loaded = 1;
var imgPath = '<?php echo $rootDir.$baseDir;?>/' +
curRow["@path"];
var gImageLoader = new Image();
gImageLoader.onload = function()
effect.start();
gImageLoader.src = imgPath;
var obs2 = {
onPostLoad: function() {
setInterval("fadeInContent()", imageInterval);
dsImg2.addObserver(obs2);
</script>
</body>
</html>

Converting Images to CMYK for Print Publication

When in my workflow should I be converting images to CMYK for print publication?
Currently, I shoot RAW photographs with my DSLR in Adobe RGB, import the images into Photoshop for manipulation and then convert the final, sized image to CMYK before placing it in my Indesign document. Before going to print, I convert my files to PDF using the [PDF/X-1a:2001] preset. I use a calibrated system with a profile set for my monitor.
Since many of my pictures have shades of green, I'm often disappointed with the conversion to CMYK because I lose saturation and brightness. Am I doing anything wrong? Is there a better way of preserving the quality of colour in my images when going to a commercial printer?

To see in InDesign what color shifts will occur, use View=>Proof Colors.
I would also recommend View=>Overprint Preview.
Yes there are color shifts when converting RGB to CMYK, but those are due to the fact that the gamut of CMYK is significantly less than AdobeRGB or even sRGB. The same color shifts going to CMYK will occur whether you convert the image in Photoshop or in InDesign during PDF export or at the RIP.
Keeping the color in ICC color managed RGB has the advantage that last minute changes can be made as to what CMYK printing conditions are used, i.e. all CMYK is not the same. Furthermore, if you convert RGB to CMYK early in the workflow, you lose the ability to maintain the color gamut for display of the PDF as well as for printing to high fidelity color devices, i.e., offset or digital (especially inkjet) devices that have extra colorants such as light cyan, light magenta, orange, and/or green to dramatically expand the gamut. Once you lose the gamut in your imagery via conversion to CMYK, you can't go back.
- Dov

Indesign CS6 - interactive pdf with the hidden image can't be print out

Hi all,
I am creating a interactive pdf with "Hidden until triggered" function when roll over to apper and roll out to disapper and also selected a "printable" function (Button and Forms/ PDF Options/ printable).
The image can be print out when opened in very begining, but after triggering those hide image... those images just cant be print out!
Is it any way to print out the hiden image after triggered?
Thanks

Pressumably an Indesign question.
Try posting in the Indesign forum
http://forums.adobe.com/community/indesign/indesign_general

Image in Word doc prints Jaggy

I've inserted my company's logo into a Word document for the header, but every time I print it, it to a PDF, it looks very jaggy.
I have a sample of the logo in various forms: http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/483/jaggy.png
1. This is how it looks in the word document.
2. This is how it looks when I print it as a PDF- I set the PDF printer to Hi Quality and it actually makes the font on the right look better, but the logo (PNG) on the left looks very bad. The text at the bottom is almost illegible in the PDF.
3. This is the logo alone printed as a PDF through GIMP.
4. This is the logo printed on a gradient background through GIMP.
When printing the image to an actual printer, it looks exactly like it does in Word.

png is really not appropriate for a logo, it should be created as a vector graphic so that it will display well no matter what reasonable resolution is chosen. Is the logo available in a better format?

Images Rotated 90 Degrees on prints

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for