Impact of creating org level for PERSA

Hi,
I am currently on a HCM project, and have been requested to make personnel area an org level. The security currently is working by Personnel area, with their org structure using location on personnel area, and subarea for region. Because we are not finished with the blueprint stage, i'm hesitant to create this, as the security is working on the testing I have done on the sandbox. Their reasoning is for using derived roles. HCM is only phase 1. So, wouldn't this need to be considered for every new project they implement? If deriving is neccessary, has anyone ever derived on Plan Version? Has anyone ever had problems with creating org levels? Any information would be appreciated, I've looked all over, and just want to make the best recommendation. Thank you.

Hi
I often change PERSA to org level, unless the customer is using structural profiles, as Rainer described just use the report PFCG_ORGFIELD_CREATE, but remember,you need to run this report for all the HR systems in your landscape - the change isn't transported, and if you forget, your role transports will fail.
Regarding the Plan Version org level - I have never seen it used
Regards
Morten

Similar Messages

ERM -- unable to determine matching org. level for BRGRU in the system

Hello,
I have a problem.
When I trY to import in the ERM (SAP GRC AC 5.3 SP5) a mass import of roles (derived roles) using the template Organizational Template.
Some of the roles gives me this error:
"Role not imported; unable to determine matching org. level for BRGRU in the system".
In the file I put for example
ZAPVAPINTE BUKRS 0083
Am I doing it right? or do I have to put $BURKS?
Best regards.
Pablo Mortera.

I have found that when you run the background job "syncronization of the organizational values" it pulls the org value name and all "values" assigned to it. If you don't have values specified (on the table level) for the org name, you get this error. We have many fields that we use values for these fields but they aren't specified in the table.
For example: We have the org value "PLVAR" with the values "AL", "01", "02", "03", and "GB" assigned to it. You can actually see these values in the backend system using SE11. We do not get this error on this org value. However, we have another org value "SACHZ" that we use, but we do not have any values assigned to it on the table level, so it is giving us this error. We are trying to find out how to populate the "values" field since this was not done through configuration.
Here are the steps: (1) Go to SE11 in your backend system. (2) Put your org value (example: PLVAR) in the "DATA TYPE" field and click display. (3) Double click on the Domain name. (4) Go to the Value Range Tab and click on the "Value Table" name if there is one. This is the table that has the org values assigned in it - normally done through configuration. (5) go to Utilities --> table contents --> display. (6) execute the table contents. These are the values that the sync job pulls over. If there are no values there or if there is no "values table" name, you get the error. If there are values there, you don't get it.
We are working with our technical team to get the values in these fields to see if that works. Another quick way to see if there are values assigned to the org field is to use "Org Value Mapping" in ERM. Select the "derived org level field" you want to see and click on the "org value from" magnifying glass. If no values are there, a "values table" hasn't been populated in SE11.
It doesn't make much sense to me though because we can still use values for these fields for our derived roles....we just don't populate the table with them.
I'll update this message if we find a solution.
Thanks,
Peggy

Org Level, fund center/cost center level restriction for tcodes????

I am looking to see whether org level restriction and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible for certain set of transactions.
I am using USOBX table for this analysis. This table has a check flag field ( same as in SU24) which says whether the Tcode (program) does the authority check for certain auth objects. Example- X (checked but not maintained in USOBT). This table pulls up several authorization objects under the 'X' category. However, when I do the System trace for the same tcode, all the objects (marked as X) are not captured. Instead only a few are captured.
Can we rely on the USOBX data or should we do system Trace for every tcode. I am just pulling a report and not creating roles at this point. So trace is time consuming. But data reliability is equally important.
My objective is to verify whether org level and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible or not for some tcodes.
Do you have any suggestion to achieve this faster (through USOBX or any other means)?
Thanks in advance
Kee

I would suggest you to check USOBX_C and USOBT_C instead of USOBX and USOBT as it will have your customization as well and not just the standard ones given by SAP.
Also when check field is X ...it means the object is checked but not maintained for the t-code as you already said but I am not sure how much it will help you as the they will not be pulled by PFCG when you are creating the role until you change the object to Check / maintain . When you do that the check field will be Y and not X. So basically it is the Y one which you need to see.
Going for trace is time consuming for every t-code and I am not sure if it really needed. When your roles are in testing phase and are tested by the functional team or the team which needs it and if they are missing some object, you can run a trace and find the missing object....
I am not sure on what basis you want to change some field to Org level ...but typically it is done if you want to do segregation of roles based on these org level. There could be various other reasons and it is better to talk to your functional counterparts before changing a field to Org level.
for ex : If you want to segregate on company code, you will create co. code as Org level and create roles for different company code.

Creating levels for calendar

Hi All,
1. I have one requirement. I have only one table for a repository, in that i have one column(dimension) for year related like "p_moth" data is like 01-12-2009, 01-11-2009 etc....
2. How to create dimension levels for this column like year,Qtr,Month etc... for this
3. Because i need to fetch the data for column1 is 01-04-2009 to 01-01-2010 and for column2 is 01-01-2010. Column1 and column2 are different measures. And i need to calculate the percentage for sum of these two columns. How to do this.
I am new to OBIEE. I searched in many forums but i didn't get my requirement. Please help me. This is urgent requirement for me.
Thanks in advance
Raj

Hi,
On Time table map for
year from functions YEAR(<<dateExpr>>)
for quarter funtction Quarter_Of_Year(<<dateExpr>>)
for month Month(<<dateExpr>>)
You don't have day so you stop with your time dimmension on just year-quarter-month
Then the dimmension must be as you know
Total with1 nr. of elements, grand total level check box checked, with one chiled called year.
Year wit 10 nr. of elements ... and so on
Don't forget to check that it is time dimmension and set level keys...
For nr3. I answer on your other post:
Re: Prompts for individual columns
Hope is helps...
Regards
Nicolae

EXTEND VENDOR FROM PURCHASE ORG LEVEL TO CO CODE LEVEL

Dear friends,
I have create a vendor master at purchase organization level using T code mk01, Now want to extend it to company code level, please suggest me how to extend vendor code form purchase oganiztion level to company code,
With regards,
ARABBAS
Note : Please search forum before posting
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on May 30, 2011 9:48 PM

Hi
MK01 can be used for maintaining the vendor details at the purchasing org level & for general data
FK01 can be used for maintaining the vendor details at the company code level & for general data.
XK01 can be used for maintaining the vendor details at the company code , purchasing org level and general data
if wnat extend vendor at company code level,then use t-code xk01 or fk01
check following link
[Vendor create]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

How to Inactive Item Status at Org Level

How to Inactive Item Status at Org Level and what are the implications of doing so.
What are the prerequisits before inactivating an item status.
The Procedure I am following is
Changing the Item Attribute control to Org Level for Item Status
Log on to Organization Items and Selecting the Item Status as Inactive.
Can any one please let me know what are the pre requisits before Inactivating an Items and The procedure I am following is correct.
Thanks
Srinivasa Garikipati

Hi;
Please check serial attribute and org attribute problems with item master and see its helpful
Also you can check:
http://oz1-n.blogspot.com/2009/06/interview-questions-for-oracle-11i-apps.html part
1. Once an item is assigned to an organization, is it possible to remove this association at a later time?
2. How do I inactivate an item?
Regard
Helios

Mass role Import in ERM "unable to determine matching org. level" Error

I am trying to upload the Derived Roles into the ERM. I have already uploaded all the Parents Roles. The volumes of the Derived Roles is huge in my SAP Backend system.
I am not able to understand what should be the content of Org File which we upload. Please correct if I am wrong
1>Example a role Z_TEST_D is derived from Z_TEST on the org levels EKGRP,KOART,GSBER,WERKS.
2>I have run Org Synchronization Job in the ERM
3>Downloaded Z_TEST (Parent Role) and uploaded it into ERM(It was easy because there was no org file)
4> Downloaded Z_TEST_D(Derived Role) through /VIRSA/RE_DNLDROLES Tcode in backend.
5>Downloaded the AGR_1252 information for this role which contained the Org levels and values
6>I put all those information into the Org File and then tried to upload it throws me the error Role Z_TEST_D : not imported; unable to determine matching org. level for WERKSin the system
So I again tried with the another method by changing the input sheet for the Org File
Z_TEST_D BUKRS 0* 9*
Z_TEST_D EKGRP *
Z_TEST_D KOART *
Z_TEST_D GSBER *
Z_TEST_D WERKS *
and tried to upload it again gave me the same error. I have checked the ERM all these Org Levels are fetched into the ERM. I am not sure if I am missing any basic things.
Current Support pack: SP10 Hot Fix 2.
Please share your experience and best practice to upload the roles,

Hello Rahul,
I had that same problem with SP10 also. The way I resolved itand this sounds crazywas to move that WERKS line up one or two rows.
The problem I noticed was not with all derived roles, but when there was a problem, it was always the last line of the Org file for the role that was causing the problem. And the problem was not always WERKS either.
If the next time you run it, the error occurs on the "new" last line (e.g. GSBER), move that line up also. Eventually they all make it in. I have not seen this problem repeated in SP12. Don't delete the line, just shift the order within the number of rows the role has.
P.S. I have several hundred derived roles, about 10 - 15% had this import problem.
-Dylan

Question on org level values in derived roles

I have a set of derived roles for a retail org.
They have set the org level for the WERKS object to the store number i.e. 0012. in the M_MSEG_LGO, M_MSEG_WMB, and M_MSEG_WWE but set it to "" in the M_MRES_WWA and M_MSEG_WWA. Needless to stay the "" is overiding the site restriction.
My question is, how can they allow store to store transfers and goods issues for other sites but only do POs and goods receipts for their default store?
If the transactions in the role are using the same object, it doesn't seem like it can be done but I am told it can! I can't figure it out. Can anyone assist?
Thanks

If you are talking about straight authorization object ( then your design cannot go with derived role concept )
If your controls are only through the organizational object only then derived role design will help
If its a mix of both standard object + organizational level object derived role will not help you.
Please note
the WERKS is the organization level in your case the plan value is 0012
do not set the values in parent role and also do not populate this value were its "$werks"
what is TCODE you are using ?
Edited by: Franklin Jayasim on Jul 21, 2010 11:45 PM

Create material from reference material for all org.levels

Hi,
i want to create a material from a reference material with all MARA, MAKT, MARC, MBEW, MARD, MARM, MVKE, MLAN, MLGN and MLGT content for all organizational levels of the reference material.
For instance, my reference material has 200 MARC entries. All these entries should also be created for the new material.
Transaction MM01 will copy from reference but only for 1 organizational level. To create 200 plants manually with MM01 is not an option.
I have to develop a copy from reference transaction, where i select the new material number, the reference material number and the required tables (MARA, MAKT, etc)
I can read the current tablevalues and insert new entries into the required SAP standard tables, but that is not nice.
Is there another option to do the job ?
I know there are bapi's, but these are related to one org.level. For 200 plants, i have to execute 200 bapi to get the data from the reference material and another 200 bapi's to create the new material.
with kind regards,
Hans

Hi Goutam,
You can use the BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA, which will create/update the material. You can pass the reference material in the filed BAPI_MARA-PL_REF_MAT. And you can pass reference material for all view like this.

New Org Level impact in existing roles

Hi,
I would like to set/create 2 fields as organizational levels. For example KLART and DOKAR. Checking these I realized there is a big amount of roles "affected" by this change.
Because I plan to use the organizational level only for new roles , I would like to know which impact could have this change for existing roles, should one modify the existing roles after creating the Org Levels ? or in contrast they still work as always an no changes / adjustments is needed?
Thanks and regards
FedeX

Thanks Bernhard,
I have a question
As I mentioned before my goal is that the existing roles keep working after running that program... and do not want to perform any adaptation....only if there is a real error that avoid work correctly.
In these 2 cases the role will keep working properly ( I mean restricting in the way that it uses to do).
1) In case field is copied to the Orglevel area after running the program and the value(s) will stay in both places (OrgLevel and Original place)
2) In case field is NOT copied to the Orglevel area after running the program but the value still in the original place .
right?
Thanks
FedeX

Vendor - MArk for Deletion at Comp code & Pur Org Level

Hi Gurus
I want a list of vendors (about 150 Vendor) to be Marked for Deletion at Comp code & Pur Org Level
How to proceed ?

hi,
To be able to archive, you must set the deletion flag in the master record. You can set this flag for a complete vendor or for individual company codes or purchasing organizations.
You can archive data from different tables using the archiving object FI_ACCPAYB...
Mark a vendor for deletion centrally as follows:
Choose Master records ->Maintain centrally -->Mark for deletion.
The initial screen appears.
Enter the vendor account number and, if you wish, the company code and a purchasing organization.
If you do not specify the key for a purchasing organization, you cannot delete this area at a later date, should you wish to.
Select ENTER .
The screen for specifying data for deletion appears.
Select data to mark for deletion by clicking next to the appropriate field.
Save your entries by choosing Vendor ->Save.
The system displays the initial screen, with a message confirming that the data has been saved.
Mark a vendor master record for deletion for the Accounting Department as follows:
Choose Master records -> Mark for deletion.
The system displays the initial screen.
Enter the vendor's account number and the company code.
Select ENTER .
The system displays the screen for selecting areas to mark for deletion.
Select the data either in the company code or in all areas to mark for deletion.
If you click next to the All areas field, the system will later delete all data for all company codes and for all purchasing areas in this vendor master record.
Save your entries by choosing Vendor -> Save.
After you mark a vendor master record for deletion, you can still post to the vendor account. This is necessary, since you might still need to clear open items. When you post, the system issues a warning that you are posting to an account that is marked for deletion.
Displaying Archived Vendor Master Data
To display single documents for the archiving object FI_ACCPAYB using Archive Information System you require an information structure that has been created based on one of the following standard field catalogs provided by SAP:
●     SAP_FI_ACCPAY_1 (vendor master data FI)
●     SAP_FIACCPAY_2 (vendor master data SD)
Each information structure must be active and filled.
Edited by: Priyanka Paltanwale on Aug 21, 2008 9:09 AM

How to create new org.level and further actions?

Hi experts!
I need help on the follwing situation.
For better separation of industries for the marketing staff we do use the branch (e.g. food, energy, ...).
For that we want to adjust the authorizations to branch specific.
The questions are:
1) Is it possible to create a new organisational level "branch"?
2) If I have a new org.level I think I have to adjust existing authorization objects. Do I only have to extend the belonging auth.objects with the new org.level?
3) What else do I have to do if a new org.level branch is created to check authorizations on that?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards,
Alex

If I read your question correctly I think you want to create a new authorization field. To get that to work you'd need to adapt a lot of software. Definately not a path to follow.
All authorization cheecks need to hard-coded into the software. Changing SAP standard software is something one wants to stay away from as long as possible. It'll keep haunting you when patching, upgrading etcetera.
If you want to 'upgrade' an existing field to become organizational a forum serach on PFCG_ORGFIELD_CREATE should give you pointers.

Unable to get the composite instance for the invocation. This could be because instance has not yet been created or because the audit level for the SOA infra has been set to Off

I am on Oracle 11.1.1.7 BPM suite on W8 64 bit. I can't launch the flow trace and get the error "Unable to get the composite instance for the invocation. This could be because instance has not yet been created or because the audit level for the SOA infra has been set to Off". I have set the audit level to development at the soa-infra>SOA Administration> Common Properties > Audit level set to development and Capture Composite Instance State is Checked.
Can somebody advice.
Thanks

Can you please confirm me the following steps...
Log in to the EM console, Expand soa-infra (soa_server1) , go to the partition where your composite is been deployed, Click on your composite, On the right, click on the dropdown Settings and choose Composite Audit Level. you can choose to set the Audit Level for this composite. If you choose Inherit, it will take the settings to what the server is being set to. Otherwise, we can override it by choosing Off, Production, or Development.
Make sure your setting for that composite is not Off, keep inherit or production or development.
Thanks,
N

How to create @prompt filter at universe level for my Webi reports

Dear all,
I am using BO XI 3.1 SP3 with SAP BW 7.0.
I have created an open[big] query based on a multiprovider for my OLAP universe.
OBJECTIVE: to create LOV prompts for Calender year, for my webi reports, which takes 2010 as input then offsets the input year and then shows Gross sales for the prompt year [2010], 2009 & 2008.
ISSUE: if 2010 is selected in webi prompt filter, then it doesn't display any data for any other year, lets say gross sales for 2009.
ALTERNATIVE: i tried to create a prompt filter in the universe with this syntax,
<FILTER KEY="@Select(Calendar year\Calendar year).[TECH_NAME]"><CONDITION OPERATORCONDITION="InList"><CONSTANT TECH_NAME="@Prompt('Enter year','N',,Mono,Free,Not_Persistent)"/></CONDITION></FILTER>
it worked fine. but i also want to create a measure or dimension which subtracts 1 from the above filter and return a result with a previous year.
e.g
PROMPT: 2010
PROMPT-1: 2009
Universe structure
[TIME]                         class
[Calender year]        class
     [Calender year]     dimension ( type:string)
Please guide me with correct procedure and syntax.

masood44 ,
I think you should just prompt for year and capture and use the selection at the webi report level.
say you have calendar year(convert it into numeric) prompt at webi level. say user selects 2010 capture it in a variable var1:userresponse('enter year'). then create a variABLE (var2) with formula :
if(isPromptAnswered('enter year')='yes';([year] where year inlist(var1;var1-1;var1-2);null)
build your report with var2 and gross income
Thanks,
Karthik
Edited by: kbharadwaj79 on Jun 2, 2011 5:34 PM

Creating a dropdown for Roles in Top Level Navigation

Hi,
I am trying to customize the com.sap.portal.navigation.toplevel.par file.
Can anybody please help me to create a dropdown for various roles in the portal,if the user clicks on the first role in the Top Level Navigation ,he should see a dropdown list with worksets of the role.
Any help would be really appreciated
Thanks
Art Tech.

Hello Art Tech,
I hope I understand you right. You want to change the appearance of the custom built TLN according to the currently chosen portal theme, just like the standard TLN would change its appearance.
Well, if so, then there are two ways:
1) The HTML and styles/classes of your custom built TLN are still more or less the same as in the standard or you can at least reuse most of the standard HTML output/structure, then applying a new theme would also affect your custom TLN.
2) You have your own HTML output for the TLN, not relying on anything from the standard TLN, and you most probably work with a custom stylesheet file (e.g. "tln.css"). What you have to do then is to provide a set of TLN stylesheet files for each portal theme you want to support and include it accordingly by retrieving the current theme's name via the ILafService (Look & Feel Service). Or you rely on only one CSS file, then have as many "blocks" of styles (marked with a preceding class selector like in e.g. ".themeNameA ul li a " and ".themeNameB ul li a ") as you have themes, and put a bracket around the TLN-output with class="currentThemeName". For this last approach I give you the sample code (assuming you want to support the themes "SAP Standard", "SAP Tradeshow" and "SAP Chrome"):
The TLN code: tln.jsp
><%@ taglib uri="NavigationTagLibrary" prefix="nav" %>
><%@ page import = "com.sapportals.portal.prt.service.laf.*" %>
><%@ page import = "com.sapportals.portal.prt.runtime.PortalRuntime" %>
><%
>// include the TLN stylesheet
>response.include(componentRequest, componentRequest.getResource("css", "css/tln.css"));
>
>// retrieve the current theme's technical name
>ILAFService iLAFService = (ILAFService)PortalRuntime.getRuntimeResources().getService(ILAFService.KEY);
>String currentTheme = iLAFService.getCurrentTheme(componentRequest).getThemeName();
>%>
>
><div class="<%=currentTheme%>">
> <ul>
> <nav:iterateInitialNavNodes>
>    <li><nav:navNodeAnchor navigationMethod="byURL" />
>    
>    </li>
> </nav:iterateInitialNavNodes>
> </ul>
></div>
The stylesheet: tln.css
>.sap_standard ul li {background-color:#FFCCCC}
>.sap_standard ul li a
>
>.sap_tradeshow ul li {background-color:#CCCCFF}
>.sap_tradeshow ul li a
>
>.sap_chrome ul li {background-color:#CCCCCC}
>.sap_chrome ul li a
I hope this solves your problems.
Best regards,
Sven Kannengiesser

Impact of creating org level for PERSA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for