Org Level, fund center/cost center level restriction for tcodes????

I am looking to see whether org level restriction and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible for certain set of transactions.
I am using USOBX table for this analysis. This table has a check flag field ( same as in SU24) which says whether the Tcode (program) does the authority check for certain auth objects. Example- X (checked but not maintained in USOBT). This table pulls up several authorization objects under the 'X' category. However, when I do the System trace for the same tcode, all the objects (marked as X) are not captured. Instead only a few are captured.
Can we rely on the USOBX data or should we do system Trace for every tcode. I am just pulling a report and not creating roles at this point. So trace is time consuming. But data reliability is equally important.
My objective is to verify whether org level and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible or not for some tcodes.
Do you have any suggestion to achieve this faster (through USOBX or any other means)?
Thanks in advance
Kee

I would suggest you to check USOBX_C and USOBT_C instead of USOBX and USOBT as it will have your customization as well and not just the standard ones given by SAP.
Also when check field is X ...it means the object is checked but not maintained for the t-code as you already said but I am not sure how much it will help you as the they will not be pulled by PFCG when you are creating the role until you change the object to Check / maintain . When you do that the check field will be Y and not X. So basically it is the Y one which you need to see.
Going for trace is time consuming for every t-code and I am not sure if it really needed. When your roles are in testing phase and are tested by the functional team or the team which needs it and if they are missing some object, you can run a trace and find the missing object....
I am not sure on what basis you want to change some field to Org level ...but typically it is done if you want to do segregation of roles based on these org level. There could be various other reasons and it is better to talk to your functional counterparts before changing a field to Org level.
for ex : If you want to segregate on company code, you will create co. code as Org level and create roles for different company code.

Similar Messages

Can I use User Exit u2013 IWOC0004 u2013 Change Single-Level List for TCODE IW37N?

Hi All,
Can I use User Exit u2013 IWOC0004 u2013 Change Single-Level List for TCODE IW37N?
In documentation of the User Exit I can see that I can use this user Exit for IW37(Program - RIAFVC20) , but I want to use this for IW37N (RIH_ORDER_OPERATION_LIST).
Please tell me is it possible.
With best regards,
Narendra

Hi Pete Sir,
I am on 4.7 , how to work with it. I am going to use screen exit IW0110018 and I want to add User fields in the IW37N.
Thanks with best regards,
Narendra

Implement authorization in Fb60 tranaction for any Fund Center

HI Experts
I want to implement authorization in Fb60 tranaction, i want to restric user for using specific Funds Center (Funds Management).

One possible way would be to use FI Line Item validations for posting. The scenario would be something like creating a ...
Prerequisite...
SYST-TCODE = 'FB60'
BSEG-FISTL = 'restricted fund center"
Check...
SYST-UNAME = 'user allowed to use the fund center"
Message...
Create an error message stating that.... "You are not authorized to use this Fund Center in FB60" for example.
When the prequisites are met and the check is not fulfilled, then the user gets the hard error.
The config for this can be found under...
Financial Accounting
Financial Accounting Global Settings
   Document
    Line Item
     Define validations for posting

Fund center in PR

how to make the fund center fd visible for PR when acc assignment category = standard .
Thanks inm advance ,
Shikha

Hi,
Please check the below links...
No fund center entered/derived in item 0010& company code...message noFI313
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Funds+Management
Kuber

Default Fund center in Sales Order

Hi,
I want to know can we do the settings for default Fund center we have 5 company code and one plant and sales organization for each compnay code, our fund center is different for all company code, whenever we create the sales order we have to enter the fund center for each line item of the Sales order I want tsystem should select the default fund center according to the sales organization,
How to do this settings.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
Can you help on this issue.
regards,
zafar

Create material from reference material for all org.levels

Hi,
i want to create a material from a reference material with all MARA, MAKT, MARC, MBEW, MARD, MARM, MVKE, MLAN, MLGN and MLGT content for all organizational levels of the reference material.
For instance, my reference material has 200 MARC entries. All these entries should also be created for the new material.
Transaction MM01 will copy from reference but only for 1 organizational level. To create 200 plants manually with MM01 is not an option.
I have to develop a copy from reference transaction, where i select the new material number, the reference material number and the required tables (MARA, MAKT, etc)
I can read the current tablevalues and insert new entries into the required SAP standard tables, but that is not nice.
Is there another option to do the job ?
I know there are bapi's, but these are related to one org.level. For 200 plants, i have to execute 200 bapi to get the data from the reference material and another 200 bapi's to create the new material.
with kind regards,
Hans

Hi Goutam,
You can use the BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA, which will create/update the material. You can pass the reference material in the filed BAPI_MARA-PL_REF_MAT. And you can pass reference material for all view like this.

Item division level security for VB01,VB11,VBN1 and VK11

Hi,
I have a security requirement to have division level security for tcode VB01. Need some help here.....
Scenario is that we have two users belonging to two different divisions. Both have authorisation for VB01 but we need to restrict access such that user from one division should not be able to update record for material to which division he dosent belong to....hope this is clear....
vibhas

Hi Vibhas,
You can restrict the division with object V_KONH_VKO
in PFCG
hope this helps
thanks
kishore

Consume budget from upper level fund center

Hi ,
PSM-BCS / ECC6.00
I have created a fund Center Hierarchy,
I have defined Level 1 fund centers as Budget address and level 2 & 3 fund centers as posting address. I want level 2 and 3 fund centers to consume the budget of level 1 fund center.
what settings are required to make the above scenario work. Also the otherway, can i restrict level 2 or 3 fund centers from consuming budget assigned to level 1 fund center.
I don't know if this is a right approach. Please advice how can i make this work.
Thanks
Shekhar

Hi,
I have created a strategy for derivation of Budget address and assigned it to the Budget Structure.
Derivation RULE
Fund Center --> Fund Center
FC-B (level 2) = FC-A (Level 1)
FC-C (level 2) = FC-A (Level 1)
Then I have maintained budget for Fund/FC-A/Committment Item in FMBB.
But when I am posting(FB50) to FC-B, i am getting an error "annual budget exceed for Fund/FC-B/Committment.
Do I have to do some other configuration or reconstruct or reinitialize or any other steps I should to do?
Please advice.
Best Regards
Chandarshekhar Y.

FM to get Fund/Fund Center/Commitment Item- Item level total (FMBB)

Hi,
1. How to get line item level total of of document created in Fund Management with FMBB tcode? Is there a Function Module for the same? The data stored in FMBH/FMBL are period wise.
2. Is there any way we can change Prepost amount of a FM document on fund/fund center/commitment item level ?

Hi Naveen,
check the following tables
1. FMIFIHD - FM Header table in Fund management
2. FMIFIIT - FM Line item Table in Fund management
3. FMIT - Totals table for fund management
4. FMIA- Actual Line item table for Fund management
For the second point, i think you need to reverse the origin document and repost it with correct amount. There is no other option.
BR
Amitash

Unable to do the restriction at Fund Center or FM Area when FM is not activ

Hi,
we have the following business requirement:
Background of the issue:
Field Status variant in Account Assignment category and GL:
We are in the process of rolling out one of our company codes which is
in a different instance(server).
We already have some 130+ company codes running in a different
instance. This is a kind of Instance consolidation to bring all systems
under one instance.
Funds Management has been activated in the company code for which we
are carrying out the rollout. FM has not been activated for the
existing company codes.
Now, the issue is with regard to the field status variants, which can
be controlled at the company code level and which cannot be controlled
which is at the client level.
(i)     The existing company codes have a field status variant which
has the field status groups having the fields Commitment items and
Funds center in Suppress mode in the existing instance.
(ii)     The company to be rolled out has the field status variant which
has field status groups having the fields Commitment items and Funds
Center in Optional mode.
(iii)     On the other hand, there is yet another field status control
for the Account assignment objects like Cost center, WBS elements, etc.
in the MM-FI integration area. This is at client level and at present
the same has the status of u201CSuppressu201D for Commitment items and Funds
Center. We have changed the same to u201COptionalu201D for the purpose of
testing the proposed roll out in our existing instance.
In that case, the status of GL account assignment in above is
clashing with our client level field status as described in (iii)
above. As a result, we are forced to change the field status in
above to optional mode for our existing company codes which we do not
intend to do.
When only one company within a group of companies is activated with FM,
I feel that:
(i)     At the client level, there is no option for me other than to
keep the Funds center and commitment items in optional mode
(ii)     At the GL level, I should be able to keep my field status in
Suppress mode (If FM is not activated) and in Optional mode (If FM is
activated) and SAP should be able to take care of the clash in the
field status at the transaction level in such a scenario.
The issue is we are able to control the access if FM is activated for a particular company code, where as we are unable to control the access for other company codes where FM is not activated and FM Area is not linked.
We tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, but this is applicable for POs only.
Please look into this issue and help us in meeting our business requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramakrishna

Hi Justin,
Thanks for the extra points.
Copy and save this bold text some where
/Applications/iChat.app/Contents/MacOS/iChat -errorLogLevel 7
This needs to be run in Terminal.
iChat needs to be shut down to do so.
Just paste it in Terminal after the Welcome to Darwin message and hit enter.
It will launch iChat and create an on-going log in the Terminal window.
You will see the reference to the Harware rules.plist
Further down you will see the bandwidth found by iChat, followed by the number of Audio and Video Buddies that you can support.
It goes on.....
It makes a note of the router that you are connected to.
After that it will end up lists listening checks until you connect to a Chat.
This makes this a useful way to find out what iChat can see at it's startup.
To Stop - Quit iChat in the Normal way.
Save the Log in a Text editor of some sort. (Post here if required).
Then Quit Terminal.
It is a useful tool to highlight some things in the start up phase, (And a reminder to look in specific places) when you think you have looked at all the settings.
8:12 PM Wednesday; November 15, 2006

Fund center derivation based on functional location cost center

Hi,
can anybody share the process to derive fund center based on cost center assigned to functional location/equipment of a plant maintenance order
Thanks

Hi Eli,
Thanks for your response.
Scenario is as follows:
Cost is booked to PM order & settles to cost centers. I don't have budget at PM order level. But will have budget in fund management for cost center. So whenever I book cost to PM order it should check budget available in fund center. Fund center should be derived from cost center assigned to functional location of PM Order
I have not used function module before for derivation. I have created a derivation rule based on functional module but there is no place to assign fund center in derivation rule. Please explain the process to derived fund center through PM order in above scenario.
Thanks

Funds Center assignment to Cost Centers

I'm implementing FM (PSM) in a company that is controlling their expenses only at a cost element level using generic cost centers. Is it possible to assign a generic cost center to more than one fund center and differentiate them due to the commitment items?
Thanx
Mariano.

Hi
The relation ship betwen Fund Center & Cost Center is 1 : N. that is One fund center can be assgned to many cost centers but one cost center should be assigned to only one fund center. So i dont think it is possible. If its elpful, plz assign points.
Regards
Rajaram

Derivation of Funds Center from cost center for Asset PR/PO in FM

Hello Experts,
We configured new FM area and relevant BCS settings. It is working fine except PR or PO for Account assignment category A.
Issue: system is not able derive funds center from cost center in the asset master. cost center is not updated in EBKN table for Asset PR.
we have maintained the following;
1. Funds center is activated in Asset account assignments
2. Maintained derivation rule with function module: FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET
3. Derivation rule for cost center to funds center also maintained
If maintain funds center manually in PR it is working fine and consuming budget also.
Requirement: How derive funds center from cost center assigned in asset. I have verified all tickets raised in this forum, but nothing has answered my question.
Request you to provide solution for above issue.
Thanks in advance for support.
Regards,
Chalapathi

Hi Venkata,
You have two derivation rules, first related to Asset function module and second one is related to CC and FC combination.
You need to maintain the function module derivation rule first then you need to maintain the derivation rule related to combination of CC and FC. Because first you need to derive CC from asset master and then you need to derive fund center with reference to this CC.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Can i replace cost center by funds center in new G/L FIGL_C10 cube?

Hello,
I want to replace the cost center infoobject by Funds center. From business perspective I think so they both are same. I checked the master data for both the objects and it is the same. We have created a lot of nav attr on funds center and the users want to report on that so getting funds center is very imp.
I tried mapping the cost center field RCNTR to the funds cneter but funds center is CHAR 16 where as cost center is CHAR 10, so how do we take care of this ?
Please any inputs appreciated.
Thanks,

hmm....
if you use TRUN a cost centre 0000012345 will be converted into 12345. Without the alpha, it will be posted as 12345. I another value like 012345 is to be posted and has the same meaning than 12345 that would make two different entries.
Assess this fact with the R/3 guys in terms of naming...
Note as well that the COMPUTE TRUN won't work (DUMP) with a costcentre with letters in its ID...
I would turn the ALPHA conversion for the fund centre (only if 12345 is the same than 012345); it will then be stored as 0000000000012345.
hope this helps...
Olivier.
Message was edited by:
Olivier Cora

Table for Funds Center and Cost Center

Hi,
I need to know if there is any table that match Funds Center with Cost Center. Because I am doing an interface on SAP that takes the info of Cost Center, but needs some more info of the Funds Center to process.
I have been looking but found nothing.
I hope you can help me.
Thanks
Jocelyne Garibaldi

Hi,
try this table FM01KT for FUnds center
or
table FM01
Prabhudas

Org Level, fund center/cost center level restriction for tcodes????

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for