Impact of Field Status change in production

Hello Experts,
While doing MB1c intial stock upload i got an error that "Fld selection for mvmt type 561/acct 230000 differs for Ext GA amount in LC(023).
I found that the feild Ext GA amount in LC is made optional for mvnt type 561.
For gl 230000 the fsg is maintained as ZPL1 and that field is supressed.
But the GL 230000 is a balance sheet account so i think that we have to maintain the field status group as ZBS1.
For ZBS1 the field Ext GA amount in LC is optional only.
In production also for GL 230000 the FSG is maintained as ZPL1.
If we change the FSG from ZPL1 to ZBS1 in productin system what will be the impact.
Is this is the correct process or do we need to change the Field status for GL or Mvn=mt type.
Please guide me with correct solution.
Thanks in advance,
Satya

Hello Atif,
There are some other differences are also there between ZPL1 and ZBS1.
Can you please let me know the solution for the below error
"Fld selection for mvmt type561/acct 230000 differs in Ext GA amount in LC (023)"
Am getting this error while am doing MB1c intial stock uplaod
Thanks,
Satya

Similar Messages

  • Posting Key Field Status changes - unable to generate Transport request

    Dear All,
    I did posting key field status change from suppress to optional ( P.Key 24).
    However I am unable to generate a transport request.
    Please share your inputs
    Thanks
    Sanjai 

    Hiii sanjai Babu... your client would have set automatic recording of changes in scc4... or the request would be created and yo woulnt have left the page after saving soo it might have been saved... hope it helps...
    Regards
    Abhay

  • What is the impact of field status in Field Status Group

    Hi,
    In MIR7, we want to make Cost Center Mandatory. For this we found the option of "Field Status Varient".  We are using "Z004" Field status group in G/L account. In this FSG, we want to change the status of field "Cost Center" as mandatory from Optional.
    We want to know what will be the impact of this change in any other transaction?
    Regards
    Vijay Shind

    Hi

  • ProfitCenter Master Field Status Change

    Hi,
    Can any one tell me settings where i can change field Status for ProfitCenter Master.
    I want to make field SEGMENT Mandatory in Profitcenter Master it is ECC 6.00 Version.
    Thanks
    Manish

    hi Mansih,
    as fas as I know there is no such transaction. If you want to do something differently, as the system provides, you have to write a user exit.
    ec

  • Field status changed!

    Hi,
    For a particular GL account which has Fields Status Group assigned for mandatory Business Area, the Business Area field is not available for input.  This happened after a particular date.  I did not detect any changes to the FSG.   BA field has become 'Display' for this account in FB60.  In MIRO the same account is picking up BA automatically.
    Any clue what could have affected this?
    Thanks
    Muru

    HI,
    you said "...when I post to the same GL a/c using some other transaction, the field status is 'Required'." Check the posting keys in the accounting document and there field status in OB41. Compare this with the field status in the posting key where business area is only to be displayed.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Cost Center Master data field status change

    Hello Gurus,
    I need to change the field status of 'User Responsible' field as required from optional in the cost center master data. I am not being able to get the exact answer from my searches. If anyone can help with an answer, it would be great.

    Dear,
    You can use screen variant also...
    Transaction code: SHD0
    and make that field as required.

  • RE: Field status of the vendor account group

    Hi,
    I am doing customization for argentina country specific:
    For the vendor account group there should be a field called Fiscal type in General-control tab, But i dont see it. Can any one please help me on this thing?

    Dear:
                      Go to OBD3 there you can find the field status change group option for the relevant Vendor Account Group. If you cant find fiscal type then you should must define it in SPRO....A/c payable master data For Argentina and then Assign it also .Please revert back in case of any confusion.
    Regards
    Edited by: Atif Farooq on Feb 25, 2011 8:14 AM

  • Cust Account group field status got changed

    Hi Experts,
    One of my colleaged has executed the program : RFXPRA05.
    As a result of this some of the field in Account group (YSTP)  got its status changed
    Say for e.g Street 2 & Street 3 where optional entry before he executed the program : RFXPRA05,
    but once he has executed the program we found that both the fields got supressed.
    and some vendor master account group also got supressed..
    What is the function of the Program and where  it is used and why is it impacting the configuration for account group?
    Could anyone guide us how to restore the value back and what step we need to take.
    Kind Regards
    Ganesh Raj
    9632003325

    Hi,
    You have to find the changelogs for the configuration in the path
    SPRO>FINANCIAL ACCOUNTINGAR AND APCUSTOMER ACCOUNTSMASTERDATAPREPARATIONS FOR CREATING CUSTOMER MASTER DATADEFINE ACCOUNT GROUPS WITH SCREEN LAYOUT
    Go to the link and in the menu Utilities--Change logs. Here give the date range and find out the change logs. Using the change logs in teh recent past, you can do the correction.
    Also you can compare different systems for the table T077D using the transaction code SCMP. By using this, you can find out what is the change in configuration. You can restore it to original version. You can do the similar thing for vendor acct groups also
    Hope this helps.
    BTW...This program is change the field selection status of account groups.

  • BW object status "Changed by IMPACT" - how to figure out who caused it?

    Hi,
    We have struggled with this for some time - and it has just bitten us again in our BW production system - an Update Rule became inactive with status changed by 'IMPACT.'  We need help/instructions on how to see just what process (transport?) caused the impact!
    Please share your knowledge/process for this issue.
    thanks very much.
    Janet H.

    Hi,
    Thanks to everyone who has responded.  I suppose that I could have/should have provided more information in my original post/question.  In our situation, there are no "obvious" structural changes that would have caused the update rules to be inactivated.  There were no transports, no "manual" changes in an "open" system.  There were no InfoObjects added nor removed from the ODS. (The update rules in question feed ODS targets.) 
    So, I have a couple of related questions -
    Is it possible that this condition (changed by IMPACT) was caused by changes in the feeding (R/3) system?  Perhaps by the Data Source being replicated?  We did a Plug-in upgrade on our R/3 system on 20Nov2004.  These update rules continued to function - they became inactive the first time a developer "looked" at them in the production BW system.  Only a subset of all the update rules behaved this way.  We have not been able to determine the commonality - reference characteristics, compound characteristics, etc.  That is why we have posted this question.  Any further advice is surely welcomed!
    Janet H.

  • How to change status of operation (Production order)

    Hi all,
    I would like to know if there is a way to change the status of an operation for an operation order.
    I found a BAPI for changing the status of the production, a function module to get the status of an operation but nothing standard for changing the status of an operation.
    The solution is using a call transaction?
    Thanks for your help!
    David

    Dear,
    It is not clear what you want to do. Usually the operation system status is driven by the way you release the operation or at headre level. On the other hand you can influence the user status as per your logic. Please let us know you are looking for which status?
    Raj

  • How to change the status of a production order

    Dear All,
    May i know how to change the status of a production order.I want to de-active the status like OPGN (Operation generated).This status is updated as there was no routing assigned to that particular production order during its creation
    Thanks and Regards,
    Varun Siddharth

    Dear,
    When you create a production order, an operation created by the system is generated automatically if no routing is used for the creation. As a result the order header receives the status HOGAN; the operation created automatically also has this status.
    If you delete the operation created automatically and then do not have the status HOGAN.
    To avoid this maintain the Routing for the material or delete the setting of default operation from OPJG.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Report of List of all status changes for various production orders at a tim

    Hi,
    Can I have a standard report which shows the dates of each and every status (user & system) of a production order.
    I need to have a report for a list of productio orders at a time.
    If we go to CO03, header menu, status changes option is there, but it only caters for single production order.
    Table JCDS is available to know the dates but I need a standard one rather than a Z development.
    Or you can guide me any function module.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hello,
    You will get the details of status in following table.
    JEST - for object status
    JSTO - Status Profile
    TJ02T - to Decode the status Number
    as the status data you will get from JEST is in very typical form you have to use TJ02T to find the exact status
    AM

  • Mass change on production order (assembly type) to put deletion flag status

    Dear all,
    I've make a mass change on production orders to settle the status DLFL through the Tcode CO78.
    Some of the production orders  are "assembly order" type. Those could not be up-dated with the DLFL because there are linked to customer order. The customers orders are closed.
    What can I do to change the status for this kind of production orders. It is necessary for me to be able to put the DLFL status in order to improve the process of production closure done each month.

    Hi kiran 
    Thanks for the response. As I cannot put deletion indicator on the Assembly order directly, Do we have to put deletion indicator on the sales order item?. If so, Can we put a deletion indicator after the sales order was delivered and invoiced. What exactly have you guys done to put deletion flag on the production order.

  • Change G/L Codes Field Status group

    Hi Experts,
    I want to change in G/L Codes Field Status group in Mass. Is their any transaction code for that? Please help me.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hemant Maurya

    Hello,
    If you have not used mass change earlier, you need to be very careful, as these changes are IRREVERSABLE.
    Accounting => Fianancial Accounting => GL Accounting => Master Data => Collective Processing => Change Company Code data.
    Alternatively, you can use MASS transaction code to change them in mass.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Charm Impact on changing the production server

    Hi All,
    we currently using Charm for a three system ECC landscape.
    Now currently so many changes are there in various stages.
    now , the team is planning to change the production server to high availabitlity server.
    there will not be any change in the transport route and all, only instead of existing server, the new server details will be added.
    I just wanted to know will there be any major impact in the current chagnes.
    kindly advice.
    Thanks,
    Subhashini.

    Hi
    its like system migration to the new server? or it is by client export?
    can you refer the thread [How to replicate Existing running Production server.|How to replicate Existing running Production server.]
    and read the note [Note 1395727 - ChaRM project does not work after product version changed|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1395727]
    more further on
    [Note 1394820 - SMSY: Converting SAP ECC system to SAP ERP system|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0001394820&nlang=E]
    check and update
    jansi

Maybe you are looking for

  • Page headers are not exported to excel files - can this be fixed in 2008SP3

    I use 2008, SP3. I am experiencing a problem with exporting to Excel(.xls): the page headers, but the very first, are not exported. The report page headers consist of weekdays and the corresponding dates, meanning they are different on each page. The

  • Photoshop Touch won't run on HTC Flyer

    I just ditched my Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v (600 Euro's) because Google, Samsung, and Vodafone refuse to release the Android 3.2 update. (It currently runs on Android 3.0.1, and Adobe Touch apps require 3.1.) So I bought me a HTC Flyer (500 Euro's), a

  • A whole lot of problems _

    Ok, so I got as a gift an iPod shuffle that used to belong to my aunt. Now, I charged it for an two hours straight, then I had to leave on a trip so I put it away and then charged it straight for like 5 hours. I have no idea what is going on, but whe

  • Why does Acrobat X Reduce File Size make significantly bigger files?

    Drawings at AO size, probably from AutoCad, each pdf ranging in size from 600 to 800kb.  No encription.  No attachments.  No embedded fonts.  Reprinted them through Acrobat X Pro to A3 then combined them. Binder size was about 5MB, too large for my c

  • Is there any  example snippet for XPath using namespace

    Hi, I have used XpathApi class to get the XML node matching my xpath that does not deal with namespaces and it works for me. However, it does not seem to work well when I construct the xpath with namespaces (probably I may be doing something wrong ex