Impact of upgrading SAP 4.6C to ECC6.0 to Java application

Hi,
Currently, my Java application is:
1. using SAP 4.6C as backend
2. using Java 1.4
3. using SAP Enterprise Connector in SAP Netweaver Developer Studio 7.0.15 to generate the BAPI proxies
4. using JCo 2.1.8
If now the backend SAP system is going to be upgraded from 4.6C to ECC6.0, will there be any changes required on my Java application i.e.
1. Is the BAPI proxies generation process with SAP Enterprise Connector remain unchanged?
2. Are the BAPI structures remain the same that do not require any Java code change when calling BAPI?
3. Is the JCo version remains unchanged?
4. Is there any Java code changes required?
Thanks!

Hi,
1. Is the BAPI proxies generation process with SAP Enterprise Connector remain unchanged?
Yes. No change required except minor changes.
2. Are the BAPI structures remain the same that do not require any Java code change when calling BAPI?
Well you will have to check if the BAPI import/export/tables/changing parameters have undergone any change. If not then no change required.
3. Is the JCo version remains unchanged?
Yes. This shouldnt be an issue.
4. Is there any Java code changes required?
Well if your 4.6c system was non-unicode, ECC 6.0 would be unicode. So the RFC where you would have mentioned that a Unicode(java) system is interacting with Non-unicode(4.6c) system will require a change. This is applicable to both RFC's in SAP & Java.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

*Connection problems Sap A Java Application*

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem. I'm riding the part of the JCO SERVER for SAP from sending information to a Java application.
I created the RFC destination of the type TCP / IP and I have registered my JAVA application in the visual administrator. This application java is already deployed listening to SAP and I can think of the following error when I run a BAPI created in the ABAP fate that I created.
It's not that I can think of that might be.
Or if someone was going another way of doing it from using sap we can send things to JAVA without having to java call the BAPI please help.
Errores tiempo ejecucióCALL_FUNCTION_REMOTE_ERROR
"JCO.Server could not find server function 'Z_BAPI_RFC'"
¿Qué ha sucedido?
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "Z_BAPI_RFC====================FT" had to be terminated because one of the statements could not be
executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
The error occurred in an RFC call to another system.
The target system has also written a short dump.
Consult this short dump for more precise information about
the cause of the error.

Please note that this forum is dedicated to all other development-related questions which are not directly addressed by other forums. This includes Business Objects SDKs, products, or technologies which do not fall under BusinessObjects Enterprise, BusinessObjects Edge, Crystal Reports Server, or Crystal Reports (for example Desktop Intelligence SDK, Universe Designer SDK, Portal Integration Kits, Java User Function Libraries, and other third party technologies or development languages).
As your query relates to an SAP product, please post to an SAP forum.
Ludek

Follow up activities after SAP (CU&UC) upgrade from SAP 4.6c to ECC6 EHP4

Dear Friends
We have completed SAP (CU&UC) upgrade from SAP 4.6c to ECC6 EHP4.
We refereed the upgrade guide for follow activities and we required confirmation before performing the activities.
Could you please help us what needs to be done immediately after upgrade.
Regards,
Bharathi

Dear Nils,
Thanks for the support.
Yes, we are following the same document 'CUUC46C_to_NW701SP07' for unicode conversion after the upgrade from the note 928729.
Please suggest us in that document which are the steps should be carried out after ECC6.0 EHP4 upgrade,
1. Preparation
2. Unicode Preconversion Phase in SAP Basis 4.6C
3. Upgrade Process
4. Unicode Conversion Phase
5. Unicode Conversion Completion Phase
6. SAP Notes
Regards,
Bharathi

SAP 4.7 to ECC6 EHP5 Upgrade inc.OGSD - "/ICO/MOC_NEW_GUI" nametab error

Hello all,
I'm currently running a SAP upgrade from 4.72 to ECC6 EhP5 SPS6.
This upgrade include OGSD upgrade from4.72 SP12 to OGSD 6.10 SP5.
Duing phase upgrade phase RUN_RSPTBFIL_DEST, I have the following error message : Could not read nametab "/ICO/MOC_NEW_GUI".
According to OSS note 1377262, I download fix A61000INOGSD.SAR and extract file A-61000INOGSD.SAP in <upgdir>/cofiles (and also in <transdir>/cofiles).
Phase RUN_RSPTBFIL_DEST is still in error when I repeat it.
I note that content of A-61000INOGSD.SAP file is a little bit different regarding my error message:
Inside file:
I 2EETW109 table "/ICO/MOC_NEW_GUI" does not exist in nametab.
My error message:
2EETG011 "[DESTINFO] Could not read nametab""/ICO/MOC_NEW_GUI"
Many thanks for your help & feedback,
Chris

Hello Chris,
we experienced the same issue as you.
After discussion with the SAP Support team, it appears that this migration path is not the good one.
The right procedure is now to upgrade to ECC6 EhP5 with OGSD 6.10 SP0 and then to apply manually the SPs you want on OGSD add-on.
I think they are currently updating the corresponding OSS Notes.
I hope it will help.
Vincent

Encounter a problem during upgrade sap r/3 4.7 to ecc6

Hi expert:
i encounter a problem during upgrade sap r/3 4.7 to ecc6
in START_SHDI_FIRST step.
here is the error msg~
MSSCRESPDEFN.LOG
Msg 2812, Level 16, State 62, Server Jack, Line 6
Could not find stored procedure 'dbo.sap_upg_getrelease'.
setuser
i checked MS SQL DB and found out that i only got 'erp.sap_upg_getrelease' but not dbo owner.
can any one tell me how to solve this problem?~
thanks.
Regards
Jack Lee

It's the kernel for the shadow the correct?.
Regards,
Alfredo.

Upgrading SAP ECC 5.0 to ECC6 phase GETSYNC_PREUP_FINI_D

I'm in process of the Upgrading SAP ECC 5.0 to ECC6 And, now it is in upgrade phase GETSYNC_PREUP_FINI_D. But, phase in GETSYNC_PREUP_FINI_D the Upgrade already runs to 24 hours.
============================================
The following START modes are available:
- Repeat phase GETSYNC_PREUP_FINI_D to continue
   the upgrade at the point it stopped.
- Initialize phase GETSYNC_PREUP_FINI_D to restart
   this phase from the beginning.
- Initialize and run another upgrade phase
   (caution, refer to your installation guide).
- Exit this program.
> repeat
>> 2008/10/22 11:49:04 UPGRADE/SWITCH: START OF PHASE GETSYNC_PREUP_FINI_D
The parallel running J2EE upgrade needs some more time...
Please be patient...
===============================================
Database: MSSQL2005
What could be the problem. I can skip it and go to the next stage???
Please help me out solution.?
Regards
Marcelo P. Silva

It seems that you have a combined upgrade - ABAP + Java in your system - is that right? If yes, did you start the Java upgrade in parallel?
Markus

SAP SD--Difference of upgrade between SAP4.7 and ECC6.0

Hi friends,
Somebody can pls tell --Difference of upgrade between SAP4.7 and ECC6.0 in terms of sap SD module or any links for this.
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
Your question is a little general...Maybe you could go to sap help portal to search for the documentation for upgrading to 600.
As I know, we have some new functionality in release 600. For example, shipping point determination with storage location, automaticly outbound delivery creation after saving stock transfer order...
Also the screen is different for most list transactions like VA05.
Regards,
Smile

Impact of upgrade from SAP CRM Interaction Center 4.0 to 5.0 on Genesys CTI

Hi Friends,
I would like to know that what is the impact of upgrade from SAP CRM Interaction Center 4.0 to 5.0 on Genesys CTI software.
1) Will there be anything we need to change?
            for e.g.
                 a) Settings
                 b) Software
                 c) Hardware
2) What do we need to keep in mind when upgrading from SAP CRM Interaction Center 4.0 to 5.0?

Hello!
The biggest change you must face is related to Java. If you had CRM4.0 Java configuration, you must change your settings to the non-java configuration CRM5.0 has. Most of those changes are performed by the upgrade program, but you must activate services in transaction SCIF.
Your other concerns:
- Software: Most of the Genesys releases are compatible with both java and non java configurations. Anyway, I am sure Genesys has compatibility instructions.
- Hardware: No changes to my knowledge
<b>Hope it helps. Please, reward points if so</b>
Regards
Joaquin

Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hello,
We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
Best Regards
Kuldeep

Hi Kuldeep,
There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
Best regards,
Shahaf Yaari
[email protected]

HR - PA upgrade issue (4.6C to ECC6.0)

dear all,
we are currently in the process of upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0
and we found this minor issue in the submodule PA:
using tcode pa20/pa30 we can not see any record of IT0000 Actions using 'overview'
but the all the detail actions can be displayed..
the overview (mountain icon) can't show all the records- only happen when we want to overview the infotype IT0000 Actions.
but all the details that we have recorded in IT0000 Actions, can still be displayed (using spectacle icon)
this is only happen in IT0000 Actions
all other infotypes can be overviewed using 'mountain icon' and can be displayed using 'spectacle icon' as normal condition.
anyone ever gone through the same issue?
we have updated patch for SAP HR : SP 32 and EA 7.
the authorization is SAP ALL.
looking forward to hearing from you.
best regards,
dhenny muliawaty (pei pei)

Hi Abhishek,
thanks for your reply and your guidance..
we need more information from you..
1. how to back up the table, is it right that we need to contact basis and ask our basis guy to back up the tables?
2. after we do the backup of HR table T512W, before upgrading your HR support package, then we upgrade the support package and after that..
is it right that we need to restore the table? or that the back up is use to do cross check on the content of the T512W after upgrade?
V_512W_B                       Valuation Bases
V_512W_C                       Averages
V_512W_D                       Processing Classes, Cumulations, and Evaluation Classes
V_512W_O                       Complete View T512W
V_512W_T                       Wage Type Texts
thanks for informing us that it's a standard practice to backup this table before applying the HR patch to system. how do you know this is a standard practice?
do you know any other additional standard practices for HR in upgrade project from 4.6C to ECC6.0?? do you have the link of this complete information?
thank you for your kind attention and support.
looking forward to hearing from you.
thanks and best regards,
dhenny muliawaty (pei pei)

Performance Testing - Upgrade from 4.6B to ECC6.0

Hi,
We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
3. Any best practice recommended by SAP for doing performance tests?
Thanks in Advance,
Reena

> We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
>
> 1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
Those components you use.
> 2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
What is "important" for you?
Markus

Upgrade from 4.7C to ECC6.0 fields missing in t code FBL5N

Few fields are missing while upgrading from 4.7C to ecc6.0 in SAP STD Transaction FBL5N. Will pl clarify me.

Hi,
Can you clear whether you are in the process of upgrading to ECC6 or you have already completed the Upgrade to ECC6 ?
Regards
Suhas

Invoice Receipt Warning Message Appear After Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Hi Gurus,
We do upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6. And we do Invoice Verification base on Delivery (Vendor delivery number), in our business process there more than one Purchase Order has same Vendor Delivery Number while GR executed. But only one Purchase order related to Invoice verification, others PO are Free PO (no need Invoice Verification).
The problem is:
In SAP 4.6C, while execute Invoice base on Delivery (Vendor delivery), system automatic select only PO with Delivery (vendor) which related/allow invoice receipt.
In SAP ECC6, while execute Invoice base on Delivery (vendor delivery), all PO selected. So than there are warning messages appear (warning pop screen) for those PO not allow invoice Receipt (message M8035: PO item XXXXX does not allow invoice receipt), and at the end PO which allow Invoice receipt then appear for further Invoice Receipt process.
At overall, the final result SAP 4.6C and SAP ECC6 is same (only PO which allowed Invoice Receipt will processed further).
The Question are:
1. Why in ECC6 appear warning message, while in 4.6C no warning message ? Is there config to ignoring the warning message. I've try to maintain system message for M8035 (t-code: OMRM) to ignoring the pop screen, but can not created.
2. How do we make warning message dissapear (no need warning message), because if the PO's has hundred items so user need to click enter hundred times.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tri Wicaksono

Hi,
could you please check whether the flag "GR-based IV" is set in the purchase orders?
If GR based-IV is ticked, then this pop-up cannot be suppressed.
If you would like to post the invoice first then GR-based IV should not be checked, otherwise this pop-up will always appear. I am afraid that this behaviour is standard.
Please, be aware that this feature is only available if you set in the Purchase Order item the 'GR-based IV' indicator:
   If the GR-IV flag is not set in the PO, then the system does not
   differentiate individual goods receipts. Please see the <f1> help
   for the field "GR-IV" in the PO item detail. Since the individual
   receipts are not differentiated, an invoice is not tied per se to
   an individual receipt and a goods receipt can be reversed despite
   an invoice receipt.
With the GR-IV flag set on in a PO, you can specify which goods
   receipt is being invoiced in an IR and which goods receipt is being
   reversed in a return. It is this correlation between goods receipts
   and invoices that enables you to specify for GR-IV PO's whether an
   item can be returned despite an invoice.
Please refer to the note :457511 Question 10.
Best regards
Erika

How to handle the interfaces in upgradation from 4.6c to ECC6.0

we are going for the upgrade from 4.6c to ECC6.0
actually we are using n number of interfaces like webmethods, informatica powercenter, ALE, EDI....
powercenter was created some programs in SAP R/3, when we are upgrading from 4.6c to ECC6.0, what kind of issues we will face regarding this informatica. what is strategy we have to follow to upgrade this informatica in SAP, if anyone have the documents regarding informatica powercenter please help me and guide me
if anyone have documents regarding this interfaces upgradation or procedures bestpractices, common issues please forward me
thanks,
chandra

thanks

SQ03, user group removed after release upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Dear All,
I have a problem about user group - transaction code SQ03.
After the release upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6 the user group, that I created in the old system, are not present in quality and production environment.
In the development environment there is the user group but doesn't contain the queries that I created in the old environment.
How can I solve this issue?
Can I recover all missing queries?
(moreover I can access to the old environment)
Thanks in advance.
Regards

Hi
Please refer to the SAP note 1278056 and 1278115 - PDS Display: F4-characteristic values are not selectable. Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
JB

Impact of upgrading SAP 4.6C to ECC6.0 to Java application

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for