Implementation of Note 80183 for Rounding: "QTY * Net Price = Net Value"

Dear All.
We're reviewing adding in note 80183 to handle some rounding issues.
Basically, our "QTY * Net Price = Net Value" is not adding up due to some rounding in determining the Net Price off the Net Value.
The note looks like the right answer, and there are already some very good threads posted on this topic.
What I'm hoping to find though is if someone has implemented the note, and what they found?
(1) Any issues encountered?  Any impact to other functionality - Credit Checks, etc....
(2) Any additional changes needed to the alternative calculation type or alternative base value provided?
(3) Any additional requirements or customizations needed?
(4) Any issues with Account Assignment posting, or output (invoice or order confirmation)?
(5) General feedback on how easily implemented.
Many thanks!

HI,
   The note: 1668972 - ME 083: Enter Net Price for value contract w. future dates has been modified in Jan 2014 and the correction instruction for even EHP 6 is included. Please check whether the correction instruction 1417190 already exists in your system. If not, apply the note.
   If you are getting the same error even after applying the note, you may raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Similar Messages

  • How to forbid any further changes for PO (QTY and price ) after it has been

    Hi,
    How to forbid any further changes for PO (QTY and price ) after it has been done GR and LIV? Thanks.

    Hi,
    Price anyway cannot be changed once GR is posted on the PO item, it can be changed only by cancelling the GR, the same applies to IR too.
    But quantity can be changed at any time.
    So if you are looking at blocking qty too, then a customized message through save exit is the option, I am not aware of any standard SAP messages that can be configured to achieve this..
    Ramesh

  • How to forbid any further changes for PO (QTY and price )?

    Hi,
       How to forbid any further changes for PO (QTY and price ) after it has been done GR and LIV? Thanks.

    Better to post this in logistic forum.
    THere will be some config option to do so but normal FI perosn would need to dig deep, a MM perosn should answer quickly.
    Reg
    Hein

  • Net Price/Net Value on Sales Order Overview Incorrect

    Hi Experts!
    We are on SAP 4.7
    I have a sales order that has already been delivered, billed, etc.  However, when I look in the Sales Order Overview screen, for 1 item, the Net Price is different than the Item Pricing Condition screen.  I looked in document changes and did see when the Net Price was changed, but cannot tell why it was changed.  Can you anyone explain why this happened?  This is causing a minimum order surcharge in the order.  Awaiting a quick response.  Thank you in advance!
    WC

    Thank you for the response!
    I have tried to replicate the scenario, that was causing the net price/net value displaying incorrectly, and thus causing a minimum order surcharge fee; which was really the issue. 
    When I re-created the scenario, I found that a change in quantity in the sales order of an item or items, after the delivery has already been created (before posting GI); it caused the net price/net value to change, thus causing the minimum order surcharge. 
    The person changed the quantity in sales order, and it indirectly changed the net price, causing the minimum order surcharge.  I still do not know why this happened?
    Do you know of any reasons why this may have occured?
    Thank you in advance!
    WC

  • Implementation of Note 660016 for Follow up Transactions in CRM 2007

    Hi All,
       We have a requirement to not show all the business activities and tasks available in crm for all the transactions as follow-ups.
       For this reason we implemented the note - 660016. Now its working fine.. It is not showing business acitivities and tasks as follow-up transactions in the CRM GUI and Web UI 2007 for all the transactions.
       But when I create a business activity as a followup for ztransaction in define copying control for business transactions.. It is showing in the CRM GUI but not in the WebUI.
      But at the same time when I create a service complaint as a followup for my ztransaction, I am seeing the service complaint as a follow up in both CRM GUI and Web UI.
       Is the implementation of this note restricting business activities and taks in WebUI forever or do I need to write any extra logic or is this any configuration issue ?
    Regards,
    Raghu
    Edited by: Raghu Danda on Mar 8, 2009 1:17 PM
    Edited by: Raghu Danda on Mar 9, 2009 5:14 AM

    Hi Robert,
       Thanks for your reply
       I checked the link, But I didnt get the full information there.
       Firstly, my problem is not with upgrade and
       the second thing is before implementing the note 660016, I am able to see both in CRM GUI and Web
       UI all the business acitivities and tasks along with other transaction types as follow-up transactions.
       After implementing the note, I am not able to see only the business activities and tasks in the Web UI
       as follow-ups and in CRM GUI, its appearing as follow-ups.
       Hope you got my question now...
       If this is not done in customization I need to code according to my scenario..
       When I kept a break point this class is triggering from another class.
       Do I need to code in the class CL_CRM_UIU_BT_ACT_CUST_GET, according to my scenario.
       Again I have a question here, will you please tell me in which component this class exists, so that I
       will enhance that component.
       Because when I debug after clicking on the Follow-Up button,this class is calling some where
       down...So I am unbale to get the right component for this.
    Regards,
    Raghu
      I

  • V_NL Net price report problem

    Hi Experts,
    I have a problem in V_NL Net price report it is not showing net price correctly in report vs sales or billing net value.
    I could tell what is our scenerio in pricing report and what i have done on SAP.
    We need net value pricing report for each material for particular customer excluded frieght and tax.   As per user requirement we customized the report and included fiield sales office on that. 
    When we ran the report it shows entirely different price we don't know where those net values picked from. When i checked previous posts and i implemented OSS note 415141 for further adjustments.  Still i couldn't get the correct report if anybody would have worked on same issue....
    What should i need to do on configuration side to get this report correctly.
    Kindly reply back and let me know the solution.
    regards
    rc gopi

    This is teh documentation I got for the program SDNETPR0
    Short text
    Create net price list
    Description
    This program is used for creating the 'Net price list'.
    Requirements (example)
    The following must exist:
    Order type TA is defined
    Billing type FX is defined
    Item category DLN is defined
    Copying control for the combination FX - TA - DLN is defined
    The default data for fields 'Billing type', 'Order type' and 'Item category' allow individual copying control. In this context, you must bear in mind that the system will run through the  copying requirements and data tranfer routines created for this purpose and stored in copying control.
    These entries and objects are released with the standard.
    The system also requires that the pricing procedure uses subtotal 2 (KZWI2) for temporary storage of the net price.
    Output
    The output contains the following per customer:
    Material incl. description
    Price content (sales quantity unit)
    Price incl. currency (VBRP-KZWI2)
    The document types and I.Cs mentioned here are for examples. The area output says what details are presented to the user finally based on the details inputted.
    Most of the fields are mandatory here.
    Hope this helps. You can reward if this helps you

  • Which structure field contains the header level net price of sales order ?

    Hi Friends,
    I am writing a pricing routine for calculating ZSMR condition value in sales order header level. The formula for calculating is   (NET PRICE / NET SALES COST) / NET PRICE.
    Which structure contains the net price of the sales order in header level. KOMK structure does not contains the net price value.
    Any ideas is highly appreciable.
    Thanks,
    Sakthidoss.

    Sivanand,
    I can not use VBAK as I have not saved the sales order yet and before that I need to calculate the pricing condition. In the sales order header level, net price is showing. I want to know which structure contains that net price value.
    You have any thoughts whether I am in correct path?
    I will certainly appreciate your help by rewarding points.
    Edited by: dossgs on May 20, 2010 2:13 PM

  • Net Price in PO Item not updating for Item Category "D"

    In purchase order with line item category "D" Service, upon first input of gross price in Service tab, Net Price in line item was updated successfully, but upon changing the gross price again in service tab, Net Price in line item is not updating anymore.
    I am using the condition type MWVS for tax calculation and a custom condition type ZPBX for the computation of Net Price = Gross Price - Tax. For ZPBX I used the calculation routine 82 (xkwert = komp-kzwi2 - xworkg.). For other item category, this is working fine. I am only having a problem in item category "D".
    I tried to debug and found out that upon entering a new gross price in service tab, the system is calculating the routine 82 first before even the gross price from service tab was transferred to the condition in line item. Because of that the routine 82 is calculating with the previous or old value in table KOMP since the gross price from service tab is not yet transfered to this table.
    Can anyone help me with this? What am I doing wrong?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Check which condition type used for Service PO pricing. Now use t. code: M/06 and enter that condition type and select check boxes of Amount/percent, Value, Qty Relation in Changes which can be made segment and save.
    Also select check box of u201CQty Conversionu201D in Control-2 segment and save.
    Now create service PO, change Price in service item level and see how NET PRICE changing.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • How to Calculate Net weight, Gross Price, Surhcarges for  Confirmed Qty

    Hello,
    I have a requirement where I need to calculate the Net weight, Amount( gross price), Surhcarges etc.. for the Confirmed qty of
    a sales order item. In SAP standard the pricing procedure will run for the Order Qty and all the prices are related to Order qty, not for Confirmed Qty. Confirmed Qty will be sum of all scheudle lines qty.
    Is there any standard Function Module to get the prices and weights for Confirmed qty? Just  I need to display this data in a Report.
    Pelase advise me.
    Thanks.

    Hello,
    Instead of simulating the order I am using the User Exit so that that actaul values will appear in item conditions tab. I am using the Exit USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP  where I am doing the sum of the scheduled lines confirmed qty and passing the same to TKOMP-MGAME field and the pricing is calculation is done for the confirmed qty. But I am facing some problems when the order has credit block. When the order credit is released via VKM3, the pricing doesn't updated. When doing the credit release, the order cofirms the full order qty and the pricing(Gross price) is not getting updated.
    How can we run the pricing update in Order change mode with pricing procedure as 'C'.
    Did anyone has worked on this type of req? let me know your thoughts.
    Thanks.
    prabha

  • Net Price does not match Net Value / Qty

    In my pricing procedure we have a custom routine for a freight & duty condition so change to an alternative condition base value.
    The issue is the the Net Value (KOMV-KBETR) & KOMP-NETWR/qty  does not match the Net price (VBAP-NETPR).
    The Net price is the total as if the alternative condition base value was not taken into account.
    How do we ensure the Net price (VBAP-NETPR) is the same as the Net Value (KOMP-NETWR/qty )

    Please check  what you have in the FROM column of your Freight condition type in your pricing procedure. Please make it blank if any value is maintained there
    Also it will be helpful if you can provide what is the logic maintained in the alt cond base value formula, which sub total you are reading in the logic, What all subtotals available in your pricing procedure and how they are assigned.
    Regards
    Sai

  • Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)

    Dear Gurus,
    Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity  the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
    Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal  quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
    324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
    But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
    "Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
    Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
    Regards,
    Sam Ahmed
    Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
    Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your post

    Here is the pricing procedure,
    We start with the amount condition types
                                            Unit Price        Units Condition Value
    ZMRP     MRP                     1,700.00           10     PAC     55,080.00      
    ZTRP     Trade Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00      
    ZDPR     Dist. Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00         (GL)
    Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
    ZPRD     Product Discount     23.000-     %                    10,768.14-
    Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
    ZDIS      Discount Value     100.000-     %           10,768.14-      (GL)
    tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS  36,049.86      as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
         Order Item value     111.27      1     PAC     36,049.86      
    And the Net Price is 111.27

  • Delivery qty not correct for partial delivery

    Hi, I met some issues need your help!
    1) Create a sales order base on the sales bom.
    2) Current stock and supply is not available for the required delivery date.
    3) According to the current stock or supply qty.only confirm partial qty for the components.
        eg.
        the structure of this sales bom as below:
        Material: A 1PC --> B  1PC
        Material: A 1PC --> C  1PC
        After ATP check ,the result as below.  
        item 10   mateiral A (Header)          100PC   ( not relevent for inventory)
        item 20   mateiral B(component)     100PC   confirmed  30PC
        item 30   material C(component)     100PC.  confirmed  10PC
    4) Create delivery(partial delivery) with the selection date.
    5) We can find the component quantity is correct but the header quantity is incorrect.

    Hi
    Configure the field 'Create Delivery Group' in the item category of BOM (VOV7) in the Bill of Material/Configuration area. Please go thro the F1 help details of that field..
    Form delivery group and correlate BOM components
    Here you can determine whether sub-items that belong to a main item, and which resulted from a BOM explosion, are to be combined in a delivery group.
    Use
    You use a delivery group to determine a common delivery date for all the items that it contains. If you double the quantity ordered for the main item, then the order quantity for the sub-item will also be doubled.
    Indicator X means that a delivery date is created for the delivery group. The system uses the last date (chronologically) of an item in this group to create the schedule line date.
    Indicator A means that the system generates correlated schedule lines. If no complete delivery is required, as soon as all the items in a bill of material are available, the system creates a correlated schedule line. On the first date, when all items in a bill of material are available, a confirmed quantity is issued.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Dump after implementing the Note 741385 Goods receipts up to current date for scheduling agreements

    Hi,
    I implemented the sap note 741385, but while performing GR getting dump
    I unable to figure out why the EXIT_SAPLEINR_003 has been called, please find the following run time error .
    Runtime Errors    
    CALL_FUNCTION_PARM_UNKNOWN
    Except.           
    CX_SY_DYN_CALL_PARAM_NOT_FOUND
    Date and Time     
    10.04.2014 11:39:15
    Short text
    Function parameter "ISU_ENHANCEMENT" is unknown.
    What happened?
    Function module "EXIT_SAPLEINR_003" was called
    with the parameter "ISU_ENHANCEMENT".
    This parameter is not defined.
    Error analysis
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_PARAM_NOT_FOUND', was
    not caught in
    procedure "WE_BEWERTEN" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    Function module "EXIT_SAPLEINR_003" was called
    with the parameter "ISU_ENHANCEMENT".
    This parameter is not defined.
    Missing RAISING Clause in Interface
    Program                            
    SAPLEINR
    Include                            
    LEINRF25
    Row                                
    8
    Module type                        
    (FORM)
    Module Name                        
    WE_BEWERTEN
    Trigger Location of Exception
    Program                            
    SAPLEINR
    Include                            
    LEINRF25
    Row                                
    151
    Module type                        
    (FORM)
    Module Name                        
    WE_BEWERTEN
    Source Code Extract
      122  
    IMPORTING
      123    
    e_vkwrt          
    = pot-vkwrt
      124    
    e_vkwra          
    = pot-vkwra
      125  
    TABLES
      126    
    i_tkomv          
    = tkomv
      127  
    EXCEPTIONS
      128    
    OTHERS           
    = 01.
      129
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      130  
    MODIFY pot.
      131
    ENDIF.
      132
    EXIT.
      133   ENDIF.
      134
      135   MOVE-CORRESPONDING pot TO ekpo.
      136
      137   DATA: p_menge LIKE ekpo-menge,                       
    "1.2 KR
      138    
    p_datum LIKE sy-datum.                         
    "1.2 KR
      139                                                        
    "1.2 KR
      140 * pot-erfmg wird in pot_aufbauen schon entsprechend vorbelegt
      141   p_datum = budat.                                     
    "1.2 KR
      142   p_menge = pot-erfmg.                                 
    "1.2 KR
      143
      144 *- Userexit um Preisfindungsdatum und -menge zu ändern ----------------*
      145 * --> kann auch bei Bestellungen genutzt werden, um das Datum zu ändern
      146 *  nicht aber die Menge (macht keinen Sinn und ist nicht programmiert)
      147   MOVE ett[] TO cett[].
      148
      149 ENHANCEMENT-POINT WE_BEWERTEN_05 SPOTS ES_SAPLEINR.
      150
    >>>>   CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '003'
    152 
    EXPORTING i_ekko  = ekko
    153           
    i_ekpo  = ekpo
    154           
    i_budat = budat
    155           
    i_bldat = i_bldat
    156           
    isu_enhancement = ls_enhancement        
    "IS2ERP
    157 
    TABLES
    xeket   = cett
    158 
    CHANGING  c_datum = p_datum
    159           
    c_menge = p_menge.
    160   REFRESH cett.                                        
    "99794
    161   IF ekko-bstyp EQ bstyp-best.
    162
    p_menge = pot-erfmg.
    "damit wird die Bestellmenge verwendet
    163   ELSE.
    164
    pot-erfmg = p_menge.
    165   ENDIF.
    166
    167 *  MOVE-CORRESPONDING pot TO potkey.
    "Preisfindungsmenge merken
    168 *  READ TABLE ekp WITH KEY potkey.     
    "MWE-HPR-HW-205016
    169   READ TABLE ekp WITH KEY ebeln = pot-ebeln
    170                      
    ebelp = pot-ebelp

    Hi,
    please implement SAP note 916474 - A dump occurs when you call user exit EXIT_SAPLEINR_003
    SAP enhancement MEVME001 contains both
    EXIT_SAPLEINR_001
    EXIT_SAPLEINR_003
    Regards,
    Klaus

  • We are not able to track how PO net price got updated for 1 purticular mat.

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    We are not able to track how how price got updated, because there is no PIR for this material, standard price maintained
    in the material master diffrent than PO price, and last/earlier to this PO price is also diffrent. And not able to see any price changes for this line item.
    Other than this can we track or check regarding PO net price for the material.
    Thanks and Regards,
    SHARAN.

    Hi,
    Check the item detail->conditions->analysis.
    You can know from where the price got picked.
    Also check whether the material has any manual conditions (MEK*)
    Mayil

  • Net price not fetching to new PO thru' existing PO for same vendor

    While creating new PO for a material system is not fetching "net price" data from already existing PO for same material against same vendor.
    This is happening after attaching OMET settings in User authorisation.
    How to solve this issue?

    Hi,
    This shoudl not happen but still you try in OMET - For the Key, allow indicator "Enter Conditions" and then check.
    Also check if any key has been created in OMFI and assigned to user parameter EVO. - Here in OMFI, check under "Price Adoption" Tab, "Always Copy" radio button should be selected if you want to copy last PO price in current PO.

Maybe you are looking for