Implementation of sample Enterprise service

Hey Gems,
i didn't find any how to guides to use enterprise services like Business partner .
Thanks
Prabhakar

closing---No replies

Similar Messages

  • Implementing an ESR Enterprise Service in Ecc 6.0

    Hi experts,
    I've finish to model my Enterprise Service in the ES Builder. So, now i want to implement that service in the ECC 6.0. How can i do that o what do i need ? I think that i have to configure an Abap proxy is that ok?
    I need information please!!!!!!
    Thanks for all.
    Hope you can help me.
    Regards.
    Diego.

    Hi guys, i solved my problem.
    The thing is that you can`t implement an enterprise service directly from the ESR to any Ecc 6.0 ( some kind of publication ). You have to model this service in the ESR and then you can implement from the Ecc 6.0 with a conection between both enviroments.
    hope it`s clear.
    Thanks for all.
    Diego.

  • Enterprise Service consumption

    Hi ,
    Is it possible to consume an enterprise service via XI. If so what are the steps to consume the web service. Is there any exmples or demo's available??
    Thanks & Regards
    Praveen.

    Hi Praveen,
        Can u please check if the following link can help you out.
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Service Interface Implementation Example for Enterprise Service Consumption or Provisioning
    /people/daniel.bianchin/blog/2007/11/12/sap-netweaver-process-integration-71-service-interface-implementation-example-for-enterprise-service-consumption-or-provisioning
    I think the following thread has similar discussios on service consumption that you are looking for
    Re: Webservice scenario in PI7.1
    Thanks,
    Ram.

  • Idocs or enterprise services?

    Hello all,
    We are starting a SAP PI implementation for a new SAP ECC 6.0 system. The implementation is from scratch, so we don't have to consider any historical issues or decisions. One of the first business processes to be integrated with business partners is the Procure-to-Pay process. The old way of implementing this B2B scenario was with idocs (e.g. ORDERS05 and INVOIC03), but nowadays the enterprise service bundles also contain services for this scenario. Should I choose idocs or enterprise services as a technique to get the information send to SAP PI or send the information to SAP ECC? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques? Does anyone have experience with the implementation of the enterprise services for Procure-to-Pay?
    Thanks for your response!
    Kind Regards,
    Mark

    This should be more of strategical decision rather than a technical decision. If your entire organization actually desires to adopt the SOA backbone, then it should start with servicizing the scenarios and in that case, it would be good to choose the Enterprise Bundles.
    However, if there is no such plan in near future, and all your existing business processes follows the earlier techniques only, then it would be better to go for idocs to have a standard configuration throughout the landscape.
    Technically, it would be easire for you to implement Idoc related scenario as per the availability of resources and SAP support availabale. SOA implementation being relatively new in market, would be a bit difficult to implement however, managing it in future would anytime be better than any other technical implementations like with Idocs.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Integration scenarios from scratch: idocs or enterprise service

    Hello,
    We are starting a SAP PI implementation for a new SAP ECC 6.0 system. The implementation is from scratch, so we don't have to consider any historical issues or decisions. One of the first business processes to be integrated with business partners is the Procure-to-Pay process. The old way of implementing this B2B scenario was with idocs (e.g. ORDERS05 and INVOIC03), but nowadays the enterprise service bundles also contain services for this scenario. Should I choose idocs or enterprise services as a technique to get the information send to SAP PI or send the information to SAP ECC? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques? Does anyone have experience with the implementation of the enterprise services for Procure-to-Pay?
    Thanks for your response!
    Kind Regards,
    Mark

    Hello,
    We are starting a SAP PI implementation for a new SAP ECC 6.0 system. The implementation is from scratch, so we don't have to consider any historical issues or decisions. One of the first business processes to be integrated with business partners is the Procure-to-Pay process. The old way of implementing this B2B scenario was with idocs (e.g. ORDERS05 and INVOIC03), but nowadays the enterprise service bundles also contain services for this scenario. Should I choose idocs or enterprise services as a technique to get the information send to SAP PI or send the information to SAP ECC? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques? Does anyone have experience with the implementation of the enterprise services for Procure-to-Pay?
    Thanks for your response!
    Kind Regards,
    Mark

  • Integration scenarios from scratch -- idocs or enterprise service bundles

    Hello,
    We are starting a SAP PI implementation for a new SAP ECC 6.0 system. The implementation is from scratch, so we don't have to consider any historical issues or decisions. One of the first business processes to be integrated with business partners is the Procure-to-Pay process. The old way of implementing this B2B scenario was with idocs (e.g. ORDERS05 and INVOIC03), but nowadays the enterprise service bundles also contain services for this scenario. Should I choose idocs or enterprise services as a technique to get the information send to SAP PI or send the information to SAP ECC? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques? Does anyone have experience with the implementation of the enterprise services for Procure-to-Pay?
    Thanks for your response!
    Kind Regards,
    Mark

    Hi Mark,
    here are my 2 cents to your very interesting disussion.
    The IDOC was designed to customize EDI data distributions between SAP Systems via messagetypes and transaktioncodes (Vorgangscodes) in the partnerdetermination which itself is mapped (the "Vorgangscode") to functional modules to do "something". The complete customizing of IDOC distribution might sometimes seems to be complex (and we both know it is more than that but it is FULL CUSTOMIZABLE from a consulting point of view.
    The Enterprise Service (my personal view multiplied with the last TechEds and RampUp Delta courses) have another focus. An Enterprise Service is (mostly) some entity which is consumable from the outside world such that they are implemented with Request-Response patterns. When you only want to distribute information why will one use something like Request Response Patterns? One could argue to get back any response, any confirmation or something else....but this is also possible with IDOCs and their acks.
    Another argument against to use an ES for P2P outbound scenario is, if yet not seen any ES which is triggert while create a purchase order in its related transaction. Is the BADI for such Transaction triggering the ES while the save event has been processed? If you could find out this fact and if the BADI (or some new kind of user exit for transactions) is implemented and fully supported from SAP I would choose the ES in the P2P processs. Otherwise why using the ES instead of the IDOC when using a PI as Middleware which is converting the source message type (ES or IDOC) into its proparitary legacy system format. Please let me know when you found such userexit/BADI for ES.
    Please don't missunderstand my point of view, I would really throw away these IDOCS and using a couple of ES instead but what is the fully supported STANDARD from a customizable and manageable point of view. When you are familiar with proxy technology you know how easy to implement, monitor and manageble theses technology is - BUT - you always have to code some (maybe not release independent) proxy method and you maybe have to invest some knowledge for error handling, rollbacks or additional commit works - all of these stuff will be handled (mostly ) by the SAP standard delivered functions.
    Last but not least - if there is any standard out there to trigger an ES from a transaction without coding I would rather use the ES instead of the IDOC. If there is no such standard I would discuss the functionality with the customer (if to complex implement an inbound or outbound proxy=ES) or extend the IDOC or use a BAPI (and extend the BAPI if needed) - mostly the proxy will the be the easiest choice if the needed field count is not to much (<30).
    So long, let me know about your findings and your decision.
    Regards,
    Dries

  • How to know the class method behind an enterprise service

    Hi,
    SAP has provided enterprise services for Room booking in Real Estate module. They are even shipping the complete application for a nominal price. But the standard version is not suitable for our client requirement so they want to develop this application inhouse.
    Now my question is:  I know the enterprise services used in this application. How to know the implementing methods behind these enterprise services ?
    If possible suggest which approach will be a better option for the inhouse development.
    1. Webdynpro ABAP and use directly methods behind the enterprise services.
    2. Webdynpro ABAP and create client proxy class for the enterprise services.
    3. Webdynpro JAVA and use the enterprise services.
    4. Using visual composer modelling the application.
    Please suggest the best alternative.
    Best Regards,
    Aleem Mohiuddin.

    Hi
    They are even shipping the complete application for a nominal price. But the standard version is not suitable for our client requirement so they want to develop this application inhouse.
    I assume you are talking about xApps.
    How to know the implementing methods behind these enterprise services ?
    In sproxy transaction you can search service and then you can see class and method implemented behind that particular service.
    1. Webdynpro ABAP and use directly methods behind the enterprise services.
    In my opinion not recommended to bypass ES and use method behind it.
    2. Webdynpro ABAP and create client proxy class for the enterprise services.
    Not sure why you want to create proxy of ES.
    3. Webdynpro JAVA and use the enterprise services.
    4. Using visual composer modelling the application.
    You can use either Webdynpro (ABAP or Java) or VC to model your application which consume ES in backend. Both options are good, you can chose Java or ABAP flavor of dynpro based on skill available in team. VC is very effective in rapid modelling and can be used in protyping or in development of complete application.
    Regards,
    Gourav

  • PI 7.1 enterprise services: How to find & invoke SAP HCM enterprise Service

    Hi all,
    in PI 7.1, i read, there is support of enterprice services.
    is my current understandings right about PI 7.1 and enterprise services:
    1.the standard BAPIs, standard RFC that were provided in R/3 are replaced by standard enterprise services in SAP ECC.
    2.a nonSAP application can invoke an enterprise service in the same way as a nonSAP application used to call an RFC in the R/3.
    I want to view how an enterprise service of any SAP module can be called by a nonSAP applicaiton.
    are there any doc or blog which shows this.
    is possible with/wihout PI.
    We have follwoing things installed.
    1. PI 7.1 SP4.
    2. SAP ECC 6.0, i am dealing with SAP HCM module.
    are there any enterprise services of HCM available (e.g standard enterprise services given by SAP for HCM module).
    basically i want to test whether a nonSAP application like a java application, can it get some info using standard HCM enterprise services provided by SAP.
    I explored esWorkplace (http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/esworkplace), but it does not display HCM related process components under the column "DISCOVER ENTERPRISE SERVICES".
    thanks,
    Madhu.

    Hi Madhu,
       YOu can check this page for simple sample applications for enterprise services consumption:
    http://esworkplace.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZkPW1pbg==)/render.asp?packageid=DE0426DD9B0249F19515001A64D3F462&id=EBF08FD8067241F787448B3EB87DA04E
    Check this page for ERP-HCM
    http://esworkplace.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZkPW1pbg==)/render.asp?packageid=DE0426DD9B0249F19515001A64D3F462&id=C6AE1E905D8E11DA36BB000F20DAC9EF
    and complete business map here:
    http://esworkplace.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZkPW1pbg==)/render.asp?id=13C98C60080711DA1503000BCDDC2565&fragID=&packageid=DE0426DD9B0249F19515001A64D3F462&iv=
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Webdynpro for ABAP versus Enterprise Services

    Hi,
    With ECC 6.0 the WebDynpro for ABAP will be available. After converting my well-known ABAP-dynpro screens to WebDynpro I will have the possibility to expose all R/3 functionality from within the portal.
    Two years from now the Enterprise Services will be there. What will be the reason(s) for using enterprise services instead of WebDynpro for abap to make R/3 functionality available in the portal? I think at the end both functionalities can co-exist but what are the criteria to use one or both methods?
    Greetings Theo

    Theo,
    This is not a discussion relegated to the bar...
    First the short methodology is correct... Id the processes, expose major entry points as Services, orchestrate, publish Service Desc, endpoints, etc., repeat...
    The real question remaining is, if I believe my entire process is incorporated with a single SAP system why would I expose Services (and add the additional layer)? 
    I agree with the comment where if a process completely executes in a single environment there is no need to change its strategy and force it to be an orchestrated set of Service interactions.  That is not inconsistent with providing Service interfaces along the process so that it can be composed into other processes either not yet in place or requiring cross-system interaction.  ESA is not saying "break open the container and make every little piece operate as Enterprise Services", instead it guides us to Service enable components so that others can consume them in a standard way, regardless of implementation / execution environment.
    As we think about leveraging ESA for the benefit of our businesses (our enterprise and the ecosystem of business partners and customers) we have to acknowledge that we do not and will not know where every step of a busines process will execute throughout time.  There may be tremendous value in executing part of a process that could be performed in that same SAP system in a completely different environment.  The main benefit of Service enabling is business agility for a reasonable cost.  I would argue that at least the main entry and exit points to major processes should have Service interfaces, followed by a more comprehensive assessment of internal process steps - looking for opportunities.
    The other side of the equation is determining what additional consumers of the process could be found if major parts of the process exposed Service interfaces.  To say, "my process executes inside this one system, so I should not expose it as a set of Services", ignores the potential benefit of other systems being able to incorporate that process in their execution (or parts of a process).  As we expose more, well defined Services that represent aspects of enterprise business processes we create an environment where there is low cost, opportunistic integration based on standards.
    Or put more briefly, make sure to execute your business process in an efficent computing manner, but do not let that constraint limit your thinking when it comes to Services.  They are two different (yet related) issues.  Services simply give us another way to leverage an asset we already have.  Make the asset available and if it has value to the organization, it will be consumed.
    Hope that helps...
    David

  • Call Enterprise service in BPM Process

    Hi,
    I define a BPM process for PO creation
    In the first Lane : Purchase requestor
    In the second Lane: Approve Process
    In the third Lane: Create PO(Enterprise Service)
    Here in the first lane iam giving the below attributes
    Requestor Name
    Requestor Country
    Product ID
    Product Descrption
    This will be send to second lane i.e Approver Process
    Once he approved it should create a PO in Hu2 if he reject it should goto first stage
    I consumed Enterprise Service from HU2 and i published in service registry
    Now i created automated activity and imported PO create service in BPM flow seccussfully.
    Now my problem is to write code in webdynpro.
    How to write code for below process?
    In the second lane i.e Approver Process i should write a code that if it approve goto third process i.e call webservice which which creates a PO .If it rejects goto first process??How to write this code?Plz can u help Iam new to coding moreover to webdynpro...
    Regards
    Shwetha.
    Edited by: Shwetha-Capita on May 1, 2009 1:28 PM

    Hi Shwetha,
    The following part of the documentation explains how to prepare your Web Dynpro DC so that it can be used in SAP NetWeaver BPM:
    https://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce711/helpdata/en/48/cae1791e774da5e10000000a421937/frameset.htm
    The important thing to know is that SAP NetWeaver BPM is waiting for a complete event to be triggered in your application. Once this is received the process flow continues.
    So in your case you would simply create two Web Dynpro user interfaces. The first one for entering the data and the second one for reviewing / approving / rejecting the data.
    In the first case you would have some sort of "submit" button, which triggers the before mentioned 'complete' event. SAP NetWeaver BPM will then take the data that is visible in the Web Dynpro context of the interface controller and continue the processing.
    The second case basically works the same with one little difference: Here you would have two buttons -  one for the approval and one for rejection. Both will trigger the 'complete' event, but should set a field in the Web Dynpro context (e.g. "isApproved") differently. While the "approve" button should set it to "true" the "reject" button would set it to "false".
    So once this step is also completed you could make use of gateways and conditions (https://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce711/helpdata/en/47/635cb242bf6831e10000000a421937/frameset.htm) in your proces model to determine if the data should be passed to the service for PO creaton or if it should handle a different situation in case of a rejection.
    If you're new to SAP NetWeaver BPM it might help having a look at the documentation first and also browse through some sample models as they are provided here:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-bpm?rid=/webcontent/uuid/006a16ad-a3ad-2b10-4e9a-af2ee5820848 [original link is broken]
    Hope that helps,
    Martin

  • Enterprise Service Repository

    Hi,
    I like to know the differences in between Enterprise Service Repository and Integration Repository (XI)?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kamaljeet Singh

    hi Kamaljeet,
    ESR is a meta data repository, meaning that it stores data that describes other data. The meta data inside the ESR is then used by development tools, modeling tools, operational management tools, and by other services to help them do their jobs. The ESR has also been given the job of storing descriptions of business objects and models that show how services work together in process components.
    Perhaps the best way to quickly understand the ESR is to list all the different types of metadata stored in in and quickly explain how that data is used.
    Type of data and How it is used as follows:
    Web Services Definition Language (WSDL) files These files describe the service interfaces of enterprise services and are used by development tools and during run-time to look up interface definitions.
    Business Object Descriptions Business objects are used in modeling to show what structures exist in an application that are implementing services.
    Process Component Models This data describes models that show how enterprise services work together to implement business processes. These models show how a service is used and what business objects implement the service.
    It is important to remember that services are not implemented in the ESR. The ESR holds descriptions of services that are then implemented in applications that are separate from the repository.
    regards
    manoj kumar
    if its helpful award points

  • Enterprise service Respository / Inventory

    I understand ESR - Enterprise service repository is the extension(and much more) of integration repository in XI.
    Then what is Enterprise service inventory? What services does it provide ?
    Thanks,
    Priya

    Service Registry is the service goverance framework for design and run time and it is based on UDDI specification. Once the registry is implemented in an enterprise level, it can fullfil all the need from a goverance perspective.
    Service Inventory is a service catelog based on service Taxonomy. A service taxonomy is a design though applied to a goverance framework such as service registry.
    Thanks

  • Configure Enterprise Services Standard BackEnd (in ECC 6.0)

    Hi Experts,
    I have questions about one thread, please help me.
    In the last post of thread Link: [Enhancement Package on ECC 6.0 for using ESR on|Enhancement Package on ECC 6.0 for using ESR on;
    1. Download the service metadata (definition) from SAP Service Marketplace.
    Q.: XI Content OK?
    2. Import it into the Enterprise Services Repository.
    Q.: The tpz file of the XI Content OK?
    3. Download the service implementation (Add-on) from the SAP Service Marketplace.
    Q.: Which way in the MarketPlace?
    4. Import it into your ABAP backend system.
    5. Configure the service in your backend.
    Q.: How?
    6. Publish it in the Services Registry.
    Thanks in advance,

    Solved.

  • Changing user who calls Enterprise Service dynamically

    Hello all,
    I'd like to call Enterprise Service as Portal logon user.
    As you know Enterprise Service is implemented on ECC, it always requires ECC's user/password when I access it.
    Off the top of my head I may use logon ticket, but it does not work well for Enterprise Service.
    I've already done the system configuration to use logon ticket - setting profile parameters of ECC, importing client certification and so on.
    What I tried:
    1. Create Destination at "Web Services Configuration: WS Destination"with following parameters:
      Destination Type: WSDL
      URL: http://<hostname>:<port>/sap/bc/srt/xip/sap/ECC_SALESORDERCRTRC?sap-client=800&wsdl=1.1
      Authentication: HTTP Authentication, Logon Ticket
    2. Try to test ES at "WS Navigator"
      -> When I search ES in destination which I created, the following error occurred:
    Invalid Response Code: (401) Unauthorized. The requested URL was:"http://<hostname>:<port>/sap/bc/srt/xip/sap/ECC_SALESORDERCRTRC?sap-client=800&wsdl=1.1"
    When I changed destination's settings as follows, testing ES at "WS Navigator" succeeded.
      Authentication: HTTP Authentication, User ID/Password(Basic), apply fixed user
    But I'd like to change user who calls ES dynamically, because I want to set the user who creates sales order to Portal logon user.
    Could you give me any advice?
    Ikue

    hi lkue,
    Please see my weblog @ https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/7891. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]  When you create SM59 HTTP destination, select "send logon ticket" or "logged in user id /password" . This will automatically use logged in user id dynamically.
    Hope it helps you and solves your problem.
    Regards,
    Arul

  • SAP XI versus Sonic's Enterprise Service Bus

    Hi,
    Question 1:
    In David Chappell's book 'Enterprise Service Bus', the Sonic ESB is described. He says that the ESB is more than a hub-and-spoke integration broker: ESB is a MOM and above that several 'generic' services, which handle the traffic and routing on the bus, for instance:
    - Transformation service
    - Content based routing service
    - Orchestration service
    - Splitter service
    - Etc.
    Is this concept adopted in ESA? If so how is this functionality implemented?
    Question 2a: does XI uses xCBL as a XML-dialect?
    Question 2b: does XI make use of the canonical-XML concept (by using xCBL) ?
    Thanks in advance!
    Greetings Theo

    As answer on question 1:
    No I never found any documentation from SAP that described a ESB solution. So al the knowledge must come from other vendors in your case from Sonic.
    But there is hope you can use XI in a ESB way. You must only (add) configure the ESB parts. This is done by adding a service repository for example the UDDI server in combination with some BPML engine.
    By adding it al together you can execute your business processes over multiple system platforms using SOAP in a synchronic way.
    This is the basic concept of a ESB.
    The answer to question 2.
    I don’t know if XI has build in support, but a know that there are free tools that can handle Canonical XML. So you can make a service your self to handle the Canonical XML documents.

Maybe you are looking for