Improving Index Management

Which DBCC commands will improve index management performance?

because I dont know how exactly index management works with DBCC commands . previously i knew 'ALTER INDEX index_name ON tablename rebuild' or reorganize command for index management . but which is more efficient alter index command or dbcc command ?
Hi wahid.maruf,
According to your description, the DBCC command is a consistency checker utility inside of SQL Server , whereas ALTER is a DDL SQL command. The DBCC REINDEX command was deprecated in a previous version so it is not as robust as the new ALTER INDEX command
is today. There is more functionality in the ALTER INDEX than the DBCC REINDEX commands.
For more information about ALTER INDEX, you can review the following article.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188388.aspx
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

The index management service is not running

Im in the process of creating a web repository with the following version history
Version History
6.0.2.4.3_ContentManagement_Collaboration
6.0.2.3.5.Enterprise_Portal_Service_Pack_2
If finished creating the crawler profile, cache, website, sytem,repository.
when i go to index admin i get the error 'The index management service is not running '
tried restarting the servlet engine, the trex server -the error still persists.
is there any tool/note for correcting this.
any help apreciated
prasad badal

Hello Karsten,
thank You for your reply.
We have a lot of entries in our knowledgement.log files as the following:
#1.5#C000AC17158E0004000004AB005FCB470003E52BC02E9648#1096401000765#com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.TaskQueueReaderTask#irj#com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.TaskQueueReaderTask#System#0#####com.sapportals.wcm.scheduler##0#0#Error##Plain###null - java.lang.NullPointerException
     at com.sapportals.wcm.service.indexmanagement.TaskQueueReaderTask.run(TaskQueueReaderTask.java:33)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.service.scheduler.wcm.SchedulerEntry.run(SchedulerEntry.java:332)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.service.scheduler.wcm.Scheduler.run(Scheduler.java:367)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.util.factories.ThreadUtils$InternalFixedTimer.run(ThreadUtils.java:91)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
Do you know what to do?
Thanks a lot

MDOP 2014 now available and includes improved BitLocker management with MBAM 2.5

Hi forum users,
Please see
this Springboard Series blog post about the release of MDOP 2014, which includes improved BitLocker management with MBAM 2.5, which is designed to help further reduce the costs associated with provisioning, managing, and supporting BitLocker encrypted devices.
Enjoy!
-Tony
IT Pro Audience Manager for Web Forums

Hi,
Please follow the steps
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alex_semi/archive/2013/08/12/start-mbam-encryption-on-bitlocker-pre-provisioned-and-windows-to-go-drives.aspx. You have to set the TPM protector in the registry and enable the protectors to get BitLocker out of the Waiting
for Activation state. Then it will work.
Lance

Index management web service

Hi im trying to use Index management web service from a Web dynpro
Have some one any code example using searchFirstChunkInFolders function?? this function only works in folders indexed by some TREX index??
Regards

Hi Subrato,
in my opinion that's not correct. In fact it's the crawler service itself that needs the internalIndexDocuments() mathod's implementation.
So if no crawler was assigned to the index, no problem should arise, as no call to this method should occur. On the other hand, the exception is thrown and this meens that the method is indeed called by someone!
What I can't figure out is which crawler, since none is actually set for that index!
Cheers, Davide

Select query performance improvement - Index on EDIDC table

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where in I have to select data from the table EDIDC. The select query being used is given below.
SELECT docnum
          direct
          mestyp
          mescod
          rcvprn
          sndprn
          upddat
          updtim
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_edidc
FROM edidc
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_error_idoc
WHERE
upddat GE gv_date1 AND
upddat LE gv_date2 AND
updtim GE p_time AND
status EQ t_error_idoc-status.
As the volume of the data is very high, our client requested to put up some index or use an existing one to improve the performance of the data selection query.
Question:
4.    How do we identify the index to be used.
5.    On which fields should the indexing be done to improve the performance (if available indexes donu2019t cater to our case).
6.    What will be the impact on the table performance if we create a new index.
Regards ,
Raghav

Question:
1.    How do we identify the index to be used.
Generally the index is automatically selected by SAP (DB Optimizer ) ( You can still mention the index name in your select query by changing the syntax)
For your select Query the second Index will be called automatically by the Optimizer, ( Because the select query has u2018Updatu2019 , u2018uptimu2019 in the sequence before the u2018statusu2019 ) .
2.    On which fields should the indexing be done to improve the performance (if available indexes donu2019t cater to our case).
(Create a new Index with MANDT and the 4 fields which are in the where clause in sequence )
3.    What will be the impact on the table performance if we create a new index.
( Since the index which will be newly created is only the 4th index for the table, there shouldnu2019t be any side affects)
After creation of index , Check the change in performance of the current program and also some other programs which are having the select queries on EDIDC ( Various types of where clauses preferably ) to verify that the newly created index is not having the negative impact on the performance. Additionally, if possible , check if you can avoid into corresponding fields .
Regards ,
Seth

4.2 seems to have vastly improved memory management

This may not be something most uses will notice, but by using the 'MemoryFree' app I have noticed that the upgrade to 4.2 leaves much more software free memory on my iPhone4 than 4.1. I would guess that this would tend to boost performance as well, but I haven't noticed any perceptible change there.

sn4p2k wrote:
im not updating to 4.2 and i have no problems with performance on 4.1
I don't really think you read what I posted!
I didn't say I had issues with 4.1 and they went away after I upgraded to 4.2. I just pointed out that there were obviously major improvements made between 4.1 and 4.2 'under the hood', and that this was demonstrated in part by the clear improvement in the memory management. I stressed that i had not noticed any perceptible difference, but that the improvements were obviously there.

Index management in TREX

Hello all,
We have a webshop running and are using TREX for the product catalog. The catalog is replicated from ECC using program ISA_CATALOG_REPLICATION.
Something seems to have gone wrong since there are a lot of indexes on TREX where there should only be a few. I'd like to cleanup the indixes on TREX. This can be done from the administration tool, but then ECC will not be notified and ECC will expect indexes on TREX that are no longer there. This will result in unsuccessfull replications as the cleanup will not work. If I do the cleanup from ECC using SRMO, I'd have to delete about 1900 indices manually. This would take about two years of my time
The big question: is there a way to cleanup these indexes, and keep ECC and TREX in sync? A mass maintenance tool of some sort maybe?
kind regards, Wilbert

Hi Wilbert,
The admin tool in ISA you are using is owned by ISA, right?
That would mean you'd have to inquire there, if a mass deletion is possible - which it should, as TREX itself can handle as you can tell by the fact that the application-independent TREX Admin Tool gives you the option.
Best,
Karsten

Improvement list E51 firmware 200.34.36

I've just installed the new firmware and I've found a VERY VERY nice improvement :
1- Now it is possible to charge the E51 while it is USB connected.
Please continue filling this list.
Thanks
Jorge

02-Jun-2008 10:48 PM
scorpeeon wrote:
found this on a site, a dont know if its real or not:
SB-014/29.05.08
New supported features:
* Mail for exchange: Version update to 2.3.
* WLAN: WPA/WPA2 pre-shared key support added.
* VOIP: VoIP - Interoperability and stability improvements.
* Telephony: AD-54 Headset support added.
* UTF-8 title decode support added.
* Multipart mixed support for WML1.X.
Changes and improvements
Bluetooth
* General interoperability and stability improvements.
* Improvements to car kit compatibility (CK-20W, BMW native kit).
* Improvement to BH-601/BH-900 interoperability.
Messaging
* SMS compatibility improvement.
* POP3 size setting support correction.
* SMS details correction (sending time).
* Preinstalled email account user experience improvement.
* Mail for Exchange and EL2 improvements.
Calendar / PIM
* Improvement of Mail for Exchange synchronization.
* Calendar stability improved.
* Contacts improvement (long names with accents).
* Contact search speed improved.
* Active notes used experience improvement.
* Switch application improvements.
Office tools
* Team Suite usability improvement.
* Notes: Email interoperability improvement.
* Sync stability improved.
Backup & restore
* Restore stability and usability correction.
Performance
* AT-command performance improvement.
* Flash playback speed increase.
* Contact indexing speed improved.
Telephony
* Improvements to IHF performance.
* Headset improvements (BH-601, AD-54, HS-36W, BH-900).
* Improvements to car kit compatibility (CK-20W, BMW native kit).
* Speed Dial improvement.
* Improvements to voice call stability.
* Call diverts improvement.
* SIM compatibility correction.
* SIM-ATK correction.
* Sim compatibility correction.
* Enhanced Line 2 improvements.
VOIP
* Increased stability for VoIP calls.
* Improvements in EasyVoIP application.
* SIP profile correction.
* SIP proxy registration correction.
WLAN
* WLAN roaming stability improvement.
* Improved EAP-SIM interoperability.
* Printing via WLAN stability improvement.
* WEP key query correction.
* Wi-Fi TLS authentication correction.
WEB browser
* General browser stability improvements.
* Full screen video playback improvement.
* Hotmail interoperability correction.
* Gmail interoperability support.
* Bookmark usability improvement.
* RFC compliance improvements.
* Several website user experience improvements
* yahoo, amazon, nasdaq
* Multiwindowing usability improvement.
WAP browser
* WTA Make Call correction.
Networking
* Emergency call HSDPA correction.
* Improved GPRS stability.
* Improved PDP management.
Diverses
* Real player MP4 correction.
* DRM support improvements.
* Time zone corrections.
* PoC functionality and stability improvements.
* Maps application user interface improvements.
* Active Idle improvements.
* Memory card operations stability and performance improvements.
* Music playback experience improvements.
* Several linguistic fixes.
* VPN correction.
* Volume hard key correction for embedded video.
* Welcome application correction.
* Enhancements to lipsynch.
* Chat application corrections.
* Instant messaging stability improvement.
* Java MIDlet security and installer corrections.
* OBEX push usability enhancement.
* APAC minor usability enhancement.
* Marlin interoperability enhancement.
* MMS sync and PCSuite correction.
* SVG support improved.
link: http://s60inside.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/nokia-e51-anderungen-firmware-2003436/
time stamp still does not work.... tsk tsk tsk

DMS Connector for KM - index issues - single sign on

We are at EP 7.0 SPS 14 with an ECC at 5.0.
I had our basis install the BP DMS ConnectorKM 1.0 and then the support pack BPDMSCONN01 9-20000787.sca.
I wound up with two repositories being created one called dms and the other dmsrm. The dmsrm repository is working fine and we are seeing the expected data. The problem comes in with searching the dmsrm repository. We receive logon errors when trying to create the index. We use single signon. I found note 686776 referencing problems loging on to ABAP though KM which is my problem exactly (Caused by: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (103) RFC_ERROR_LOGON_FAILURE: Name or password is incorrect. Please re-enter)
When I went to index_service to put the ABAP user id we want to use the System drop down does not contain my ABAP system.
Here are the Potential reasons listed in the error box
The selected principal does not have end-user permissions for the system.
The system's logon method does not require any user mapping data for the system (such as "SAPLogonTicket" for a system that is not the SAP reference system). This is true - do I create another system and not enable logon ticket?
The system's user mapping type is not set correctly or not set at all.
There is no system alias defined for the system.
There is no system landscape registered, for example, the one contained in Enterprise Portal.
Any guidance on how to get my ABAP system to display in this drop down?
dmsrm
Description:DMS Repository Manager
Prefix: /dmsrm
Repository Services: Not set
Property Search Manager:
Versioning Manager:
Security Manager: Not set
ACL Manager Cache: Not set Windows Landscape System:
Lock Manager:com.sap.pct.plm.dmsrmconnectorforkm.DMSRMMutableLockManager
ReadOnly: YES
ShowClassification: Yes
ShowObjectsLinks: Yes
ResourceValidity:30000
StorageCategory: DMS_C1_ST
SystemAlias: SAP_R3_QWA
VariantPrefix:KM
Regards,
Diane

1- Everyone group has end user authority
2- System Alias SAP_R3_QWA
*User Mapping Type = admin, user
*Logon Method = SAPLOGONTICKET
System does not show on the mapping tab on the index_service user.
So I started digging to see if I could change the userid used by the index - found that but didn't help in the end....
Changed the userid used by the index via the Global Services>Index Management Services
User management exception: Could not get service user "xxxxxxxxx" - this user is the ID we use on our web dynpro JCO connections. So that didn't help - set it back to "index_service"
Looking at my System definition - it works and has about 10 alias defined. The User Mapping was already populated in fact all items you listed were already defined as requested...the only problem is that the system doesn't show up in user mapping (WebEx is the only thing in User Mapping - comparing them nothing really stands out to me other than the systems are based on totally different templates).
Any other fields I should check?
Regards,
Diane

Performance of Creating Spatial Indexes

I have a spatial database with about 75GB of data in it. When I load this data initially it takes about 6 hours to load using 6 processes. To get this performance level I did not create any of the indexes or contsraints. So after the load I have to run the scripts to create the indexes and constraints.
To improve the performance of this I have written a script on UNIX which parses my SQL files and runs each create or alter statement in a separate process. The script makes sure that there are only a certain number of concurrent processes (10).
Creating the indexes is taking longer than the database load itself. There is one point layer in particular which has serveral hundred million rows which takes around 6 hours to complete. Are the any ways you can improve the performance of index creation. I did try the parallel option once but it did not reliably complete when I did my testing.
Does using Oracle Partitioning improve the performance of index creation? I do have a mapsheet attribute which could be used for the partitioning.
Paul

Hi Paul,
Parallelism should have reliably helped. I've heard a lot of good things about it more recently (i.e. if you tested on an earlier version you may want to upgrade/patch and check it out).
Partitioning should improve index creation speed as well. If you tend to query by an attribute, use that attribute as the partition key. If you tend to query by location (spatial query), try to use a partition key that reflects location (state, county, etc).
When you first create the index, create it local (partitioned) as unusable, then create each partition's index separately in parallel - you can use the script you've already written to do this.
Since it is point data, make sure to use layer_gtype=point
Here is a quick example:
CREATE INDEX partn_table_sidx ON partn_table(geom)
INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX
PARAMETERS ('LAYER_GTYPE=POINT')
LOCAL (
PARTITION P1 PARAMETERS (TABLESPACE=’P1_TBS’),
PARTITION P2 PARAMETERS (TABLESPACE=’P2_TBS’),
PARTITION P3 PARAMETERS (TABLESPACE=’P3_TBS’),
PARTITION P4 PARAMETERS (TABLESPACE=’P4_TBS’))
UNUSABLE;
ALTER INDEX partn_table_sidx REBUILD PARTITION P1;
ALTER INDEX partn_table_sidx REBUILD PARTITION P2;
ALTER INDEX partn_table_sidx REBUILD PARTITION P3;
ALTER INDEX partn_table_sidx REBUILD PARTITION P4;

Oracle 10g Enterprise Manager DB control vs Enterprise Manager Console

We have a consultant install Oracle 10g on Windows platform. Somehow, I only see Enterprise Manager Console installed and I can use this console to access database. I don't see Enterprise Manager Database Control installed. What difference between Console and DB control? Please advise.
Thanks
S.

ski123 wrote:
I see the interfaces are totally different. the console is more like Oracle 9i. I know the DB control is a web tool, just for Oracle 10g. My question is in terms of admin, which one is better? Why Oracle has different tool to manage Database?The Oracle Enterprise Manager Console is a Java Standalone client, not a 3-tier product like the EM DB Console.
The Java Standalone client was deprecated in 10gR1. Probably since not all features had been ported to the 3-tier DB Console (eg: Spatial index management and Workspace Management), Oracle decided to let us use the Java Console as an extra install from the Client/Companion disk. However it is no longer available going forward into 11g.
If you look at the 'Console' carefully, you will not that some areas are no longer functional and it does not cover all capability of 10g, for example in partitioning and indexing.

Index coalesce

hi masters.,
this is egarding index management. i am facing the problem regarding one sql query with union and order by clause.
when i remove order by clause, the query runs faster,than with order by clause.
is this the problem regarding index????
i know that indexes rarely need rebuild,thats why i am thinking of coalesce.is this the right decision??
what may be the problem else????
i am using oracle 9i. and i dont have statpack report coz the client is offshore.\
thanks and regards
VD

Vikrant,
Index is not picked by order by clause. Index entries are already sorted. See here a demo where I have used the index in a column.If I give order by clause, I explicitly get a Sort Order By in the plan.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Oracle Label Security, OLAP, Data Mining,
Oracle Database Vault and Real Application Testing options
SQL> create table sampletable as select * from scott.emp;
Table created.
SQL> create index idx on sampletable(empno);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats(
BEGIN dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats(; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 36:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol ";" when expecting one of the following:
( ) - + case mod new not null <an identifier>
<a double-quoted delimited-identifier> <a bind variable>
table continue avg count current exists max min prior sql
stddev sum variance execute multiset the both leading
trailing forall merge year month day hour minute second
timezone_hour timezone_minute timezone_region timezone_abbr
time timestamp interval date
<a string literal with character set specification>
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats('AMAN','SAMPLETABLE');
BEGIN dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats('AMAN','SAMPLETABLE'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 18:
PLS-00302: component 'GAHER_TABLE_STATS' must be declared
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('AMAN','SAMPLETABLE');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> set autot trace exp
SQL> select * from sampletable order by empno;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 5644182
| Id | Operation          | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |             |    14 |   504 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01
|
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY     |             |    14 |   504 |     4 (25)| 00:00:01
|
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| SAMPLETABLE |    14 |   504 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01
|
SQL> select * from sampletable order by empno where empno in (7369,7422);
select * from sampletable order by empno where empno in (7369,7422)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
SQL> select * from sampletable where empno in (7369,7422);
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3966318501
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)
| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |     2 |    72 |     1   (0)
| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | INLIST ITERATOR             |             |       |       |
|          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SAMPLETABLE |     2 |    72 |     1   (0)
| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX         |     2 |       |     0   (0)
| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("EMPNO"=7369 OR "EMPNO"=7422)
SQL> select * from sampletable where empno in (7369,7422) order by empno;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3966318501
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)
| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |     2 |    72 |     1   (0)
| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | INLIST ITERATOR             |             |       |       |
|          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SAMPLETABLE |     2 |    72 |     1   (0)
| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX         |     2 |       |     0   (0)
| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("EMPNO"=7369 OR "EMPNO"=7422)
SQL>The point that I was making is that it may be happening that you are doing an over sort sort of thing which is causing the query to be slow. Using index for returning rows in the ordered manner is not a good thing as Oracle always say that for a guaranteed ordered result, one must use an order by clause. So either you can choose to remove the order by clause or can choose to rewrite the query without using the Union operator.
But these all are just guess works. Its not possible to say what's happening specifically in your case as long as you don't post the plan for your query both,with and without the use of index.
HTH
Aman....

Trex Indexing giving HTTP Status Code 401:Unauthorized error

Dear All,
We have configured TREX search on KM repository of our EP
production server and trying to search using the same our KM repository.
The TREX is installed on the a separate server.
When we try to Index production repository the documents are failing in
the Preparation failed status with return code 6401 and error message
HTTP Status Code 401: Unauthorized.
I also applied SAP-Note 650521 and checked id index_service user and
found that its active and not locked but still issue didnu2019t get
resolved. Moreover i have gone thru most of the previous post regarding this topic but didt help.
I even checked the URL Generator service too which is fine.
On one test system also where SPNego is configured we are getting same
401 error. On this system we disabled SPnego and Indexing started working
fine. When we reverted back the SPNego configuration for confirmation of
our observation we found that it again started to give 401 error.
Any help in this regard will be appreciated.
Regards,
Srinath Pillai
Edited by: Srinath Pillai on Sep 3, 2009 8:59 AM

Dear
Open System Administration--> System Configuration> Knowledge Management--> Content Management> Global Services (Mode : Advanced)> Index Management Service--> Check for Crawling Service User it has to be index_service
If still you have problem than do let me know where is your Repository located are the documents are stored on Portal Server itself or it is stored on some external server...
What kind of repository you use CM Repository(Mode:DB,DBFS,FSDB) , File System Repository....e.t.c....
Regards
Akshit

How to control permissions in KM using File System Repository Manager

Hello everybody
I have a scenario with 15+ file servers which content needs to be mapped into Portal KM as read-only.
Windows Authentication is configured on the portal, so the users don't need to supply the portal with username/password.
Now the users are of course only allowed to see the same content in the portal as they can see on the file servers. I know that the permission mapping can be done using a File System Repository Manager with W2KSecurityManager, but in that case the users will have to maintain the mapping of rights from windows to portal manually. And with ever-changing passwords this is too big an administrative task. So I am looking for another solution.
My question is therefore:
How can you configure the File System Repository Manager in a way where it the user does not need to maintain "user mapping" manually, but only need to logon to the portal (through windows authentication) and can see the same files from the portal as he/she can see from the file servers.
Can this information in some way be taken from the configured Windows Authentication? Or is the only solution to enable WebDav on the file servers and and follow the "Integration of Windows File Servers into the SAP KM platform Using SSO and the WebDAV Repository Manager"-guide?
Any help will be rewarded.
Best regards,
Martin Søgaard

Hi again Dirk
I just studied the "Integration of Windows File Servers into the SAP KM platform using SSO and the WebDAV repository manager"-guide in depth and I don't quite understand what rights the cmadmin_service and notificator_service are supposed to be given in the Active Directory. In the guide it says:
"A number of global services and repository services need to perform operations on resources in various repositories. For example, the index management service must read all resources it is meant to index. When an index is created, the service user index_service is used. Therefore, this user has to have at least read access to all repositories that are to be indexed. Other users that are used by the SAP KM platform are the service users notificator_service and cmadmin_service. When a search is taking place, it is the user that is currently logged on to the portal."
I dont quite understand what the two service users are doing but more importantly, I need to give the two service users the correct permissions in the Active Directory (or through user mapping). I understand that index_service only needs read_only permissions, but what permissions should the cmadmin_service and notificator_service be given?
Best regards,
Martin

AFS Inventory Management

What is AFS Inventory Management, an example is
http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
Thanks
Have done a quick google search seems as if it is:
SAP Apparel and Footwear (SAP AFS)
Message was edited by: Niten Shah

Hi,
AFS utilizes wireless bar code scanning to reduce operating and administrative costs while improving efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Working in conjunction with AFS ERP or other back end systems, the combined solution creates an automated, paperless, Warehouse Management System that increases product movement accuracy from vendor receipt to customer invoicing. Employees and managers can update and access highly accurate inventory status and transaction data in real-time using AFS WMS.
AFS WMS improves inventory management and control by significantly reducing paper and manual processes through computerized automation, data accuracy, inventory control, warehouse efficiency and labor productivity. Utilizing the wireless barcode scanning system, all data is seamlessly integrated into the core distribution and financial system.
Also refer: http://www.afsi.com/warehousemgt.asp
assign points if useful ***
ooops!!! well,..I have furnised details about AFS Inventory Management and NOT about SAP AFS ****
anyways, know this as well... may be useful ...
Thanks,
Raj
Message was edited by: Raj

Improving Index Management

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for