In BAPI_PO_CREATE - Error- Purchase Order No. is not importing

Hi,
I have a Report for PO creation - Where records get entered from Excel.
FM - ALSM_EXCEL_TO_INTERNAL_TABLE, BAPI_PO_CREATE
Problem -
Excel has app. 100 similar records out of them 7 to 8 records are giving Error.
In RETURN - Itab - Error msg - " Document No. 45... not within defined interval ".
But same record get entered using ME21N.
Number Range is same for all excel records. even doc. type & plant is same.
When debugg - In BAPI_PO_CREATE - IMPORTING - It's giving Purchaseorder 'Blank'.

If you're using external numbering (number supplied in incoming data), fix the contents of the Excel file....it appears to contain blanks....file error in data content or in importing the file?

Similar Messages

MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

Hi,
while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
Please clarity

Hi,
Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.
This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :
"Implement the program correction.
With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:
Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an
inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with
BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a
confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394
"Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".
Hope this can explain the error you met.
Regards,
Mauro

Purchase Order 4500000 does not exist

When I am creating Service PO from shipment I am getting the error
"Purchase order 4500000001 does not exist
What can be the reason??????????
Regards.

Dear All,
At last the problem has been resolved.
There was an userexit assigned to the no.range table where the new doc.type was hardcoded to bypass the logic for allotting a PO Number and the problem was resolved.
Since the problem has been resolved I am closing the thread.
THANKS EVERYBODY FOR YOUR VALUABLE INPUTS AND SUGGESTION.
Regards.

Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

Hi,
I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys in chart of accounts WP2P.
Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards,
Rashmi

Hiya,
This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
Cheers.

Purchase Order history is not updated with Invoice number

Hello Experts ,
Please suggest some inputs/solution for my problem.
Scenarios is :
PO --> SO --> Invoice
I am creating the invoice with the medium EDI , when I click on Save button IDOC is generated with the message " IDoc 'xxxxxxxxxxxxx' was created and forwarded for transmission " and it showing the status as 03 i.e, The IDoc was sent to an R/3 System or an external program via a transactional RFC ...but the problem is if I got to the Purchase Order history Its not updated with the Invoice number.
What could be the problem , please suggest.

Hi!
I'm not sure, in which process you link PO and SO. There are some different ways, which are totally different scenarios - if you need help here, describe more detailed.
Your invoice is probably only created with reference to SO, so check the invoice itself. In this case also the SO history should include the invoice.
Regards,
Christian

Purchase Order Net Price not editable after GR/IR

Hi Friends!
I am facing a problem that, I want the price of the Purchase Order document should not be changed after the GR or IR is posted for this document.
I have checked that making the net price field as display or M/06 is not the solution of the above mentioned problem.
Can anyone help?

Hi,
If you want the price not to be changeable, set the tolerances in the IMG menu:
MM -> PUR -> PO -> Set tolerance limits.
Cheers

While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, please any one help me

While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, what are the requirements need to display into tcode f.13, please any one help me, i am facing this problem in production server

Hi Nattu,
Please check it will show the PO no under Purchasing doc field
Check which layout you are applied.
its should be
SAP&F124
Without Specification of Crcy
Regd,
Khan.

Error : Purchase Order Response for Service items Different

Hi ,
We are getting Error : Purchase Order Response for Service items Different , when creating the PO in SRM 5.0. what must be the reason ?
Thanks & Regards,

Problem solved

Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

Dear Experts,
I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
Could any body guide me?
Thanks
Trupti

Hi,
It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
Best Regards,
Silky
Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

Purchase Order Quantity should not be more than PR quantity

Dear all,
We want to control Purchase Order quantity against Purchase Requisition.
We have configured message setting 00 076 as ERROR. when we create Material PR for lets say 100 quantity. When we create single or multiple Material PO against this PR for more than 100 quantity system is giving us error. This is exactly what we needed.
But due to this message setting when we create Service PR and give service quantity lets say 100. and when we create Service PO and give Service quantity 60. First time system is allowing to save the Service PO.
When we create another Service PO with reference to same Service PR system is showing error as we have configured. Even though quantity 40 is still available.
What we want is to have control on quantity of Purchase Order for Material as well as service. Quantity should not be more than PR quantity.
Is there any other way to have such control? please provide other available options to configure.
Regards
Kant

Hi,
06 076 is only for applicable only in case of material.
For Service and material both, use 06 400 as error "Materials/services for requisition & & already ordered with & &"
NOtes 786736
This may help u !
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Error: Purchase order 4500000830 has no items in mb1b 541

Hi All,
I have created a Sub contracting Purchase Order with ITem Category L and Account Assignment E.
Now iam getting problem while issuing Stock to Subcontractor thru MB1B 541 Mov type. It is throwing error like Purchase order 4500000830 has no items.
Scenario is My client creates pos based on Sales order only. Now he want to Issue stock to Subcontractors based on sales order.
for this, I created Semifinished material, two raw components, Sales order for Semifinished material and maintained bom for semifinished.
Please go thru this and suggest.
Reg,
Ashok

Hi,
Did u checked the link provided by me. As per SAP, it is not possible to post 541 stock of material provided to vendor in subcontracting with account assignment sales orde or project stock.
If you want to differentiate, use a separate storage location and transfer the stocks there. When you do the GR, the components issue happens directly from your storage location from sales order stock.
Since the components are not transferred to the "stock of material provided to vendor", we recommend that you use a transfer posting to transfer the provided components to a new storage location (for example, 9999). This enables you to obtain an overview of those stocks that are physically located at the subcontractor. This information is particularly important when you carry out a physical inventory of the sales order stocks and project stocks.
If you want to provide material from your stock,
For components that are managed in sales order stock or project stock, you can define whether the components are to be withdrawn directly from each sales order/project stock or from the stock of material provided to vendor. You manage this via the dependent requirements indicator for individual customer requirements and collective requirements (MARC-SBDKZ).
You can maintain this indicator in the following places:
in the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4)
in the explosion types for the BOM item (in Customizing for Production in the step Basic Data -> Bill of Material -> Item Data -> Define explosion types)
Configuring the explosion types has priority over the configuration in Inventory Management.
If the indicator is set at Collective requirements only (2), the materials are withdrawn from the stock of material provided to vendor. If this indicator is set any other way, the system withdraws materials from sales order stock or project stock.
Regards,
Ramakrishna

Purchase Order History SES not shown when not accepted

We are working on 2 systems : one is ECC 6.0 and the other is 4.6.
When i create a SES via ML81N and the SES is not released yet : on the 4.6 version, the SES is shown in the purchase order history, while in the ECC 6.0 version, the SES is not shown in the purchase order history. In ECC 6.0, the SES is shown inthe purchase order history tab after the SES has been accepted.
Is this a setting in customizing or a difference in the 2 versions of SAP?

Hi,
no, it might be a coding error or an inconsistency issue.
Please check the note
442091 - Service entry sheet missing in purchase order hist
In order to repair already existing inconsistencies, you can use report
RMESSRK2 (from Note 141870 or as of Release 4.6C in development class
ML_TOOLS). However, the report must be modified in the two positions
specified in the attachment.
If you can not find the report RMESSRK2 in transaction SE38
in your system - or in transaction SE80 under the development class
ML_TOOLS, then please copy the program from the attached note
ML_TOOLS into your system and correct the coding according to
note 442091.
Regards,
Edit

Purchase Order Carryforward Does Not Net to Zero

We are working in a year-end test client, copy of Production, in preparation for fiscal year end closing.
For purchase order carryforwards, we find a number of documents which do not net to zero in the sender year. This seems to occur most often for the case where a line item has split account assignments. In these cases, only one account assignment line is carried forward. The other account assignment lines are ignored.
This does not occur for all cases where we have split assignments. We have been unable to determine what is unique about the instances where the carryforward does not work properly.
Our system is R/3, 4.7, support stack 27.
Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, can you give me any guidance as to how to address it?
Thank you.

Hello all. Since i didn't get any replies, I don't know if there is any interest in this. However, for future reference, in case any else encounters this issue and searches the forum, here is the answer which we found:
FMJ2 and FMJ3 process the carryforwards and reversals in blocks of 2000 lines. At the end of a block, the PO may be split up across blocks, with one or more assignment items processed in the first block, and the remaining items in the next block.
If you have selected "Block Documents" on the initial screen, when the first item is processed, it locks the PO. When the second block attempts to process the remaining items, there is an error that the PO is locked, and these items are not processed.
The developer is working on a correction to the code to handle this. In the meantime, there are two workarounds:
1) Uncheck "Block Documents"
or
2) After processing, use FMJ3 to reverse the carryforwards which received the error. Use FMJ2 to carry them forward again, in smaller groups which are not large enough to fill up a 2000 line block, and which therefore do not encounter the problem.

Workflow Error Purchase Order

Hi Experts,
my issue is the following: We try to create a purchase order in SRM with a local mapped category (mapped to the local srm system) and depending on the user the target system should be overwritten in BADI bbp_determine_logsys to get the purchase order in the respective backend.
The idea is to use all categories centrally and map them depending on the purchasers origin country.
The question is that ...
If we map the category to the backend system of the purchaser and try to transfer the purchase order, there will be no error (not in RZ20 or anything) - of course also the direct way with the FU bbp_procdoc_tansfer will work.
If we map the category as it should be to the local srm system - the workflow transfer won't work anymore and we got an error message in RZ20 with the following text: Error reading the export data for EXEC transfer of purchase order <PO No.>.
The very strange thing is, that even in this case with the FU bbp_procdoc_transfer the purchase order can be transferred to the backend of the respective user and it will switch the locally mapped backend to the purchaser / users one.
Could anyone imagine what might be a problem - is there any check in the workflow itself what raises the exception and aborts the workflow.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Timo

I am not sure if this is gonna help you..
Note 1154122 - BBP_POC : Backend Data validation from SRM
Regards,
PR.

ERROR PURCHASE ORDER

We are not able to add our approved Purchase order.in 2005 B . It gives an error u201C series period does not match current periodu201D
Thanks

Hi,
Kindly check the document numbering for the Document to be added and if the same is being added into the correct period.
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Product Support

In BAPI_PO_CREATE - Error- Purchase Order No. is not importing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for