Purchase Order Net Price not editable after GR/IR

Hi Friends!
I am facing a problem that, I want the price of the Purchase Order document should not be changed after the GR or IR is posted for this document.
I have checked that making the net price field as display or M/06 is not the solution of the above mentioned problem.
Can anyone help?

Hi,
If you want the price not to be changeable, set the tolerances in the IMG menu:
MM -> PUR -> PO -> Set tolerance limits.
Cheers

Similar Messages

  • MM purchase order net price clearing

    hie gurus
    after a field extension for MM fields in transaction me21 the net price is being cleared after pressing enter and an error message saying enter a net price greater than 0 is being displayed. hw cn i fix this problem?

    Hi
    Yet again another classic example of making structural changes to standard table field definitions.  The screen structure passess values to the work area and clears the screen field, calculations take place and the data is passed back to the screen fields but because of the changes effected the field definitions differed and thus a background error occured.
    regards
    Isaac Prince

  • Po should not editable after grn

    Dear All
    My clint wants po should not editable after grn.
    pls help

    Hi,
    you can use user exit : EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
    Following Logic can be use:
    1. Validate the company code (BUKRS ) & Purchasing document type (BSART = F) from EKKO table for the Purchase order number (EBELN).
    2. Check the entries for the Purchase order and the item number in the Purchase order history table ( EKBE) and also Validate if there is no reversal document for goods receipt ..
    3. If we find GR doc in EKBE table with out reversal documents then display the warning or error message as POP - UP by using functional module POPUP_TO_CONFIRM.
    Step 1: Validate Company code and Purchasing Document type from EKKO table
    Step 2: Check the Purchasing document history from EKBE table
    Step 3: Check whether any reversal made for goods receipt.
    Step 4: Display popup message to user:
    Use the function module u201CPOPUP_TO_CONFIRMu201D to display the below message u201CThe PO has been already Receipted. Before changing PO please take care about GR document reversalu201D.
    Regards,
    Vikas

  • Purchase order down payment non editable

    Dear experts,
    Our business requirement is after the release of purchase order system should not allow the user to change the down payment amount or percentage. I checked the screen layout of purchase order but I di not found any field related to down payment.
    Assist me how to handle this issue.
    With Regards
    Uday

    Hi,
    For simple solution, please find below which I tested.
    Once PO released, change release indicator to 1.
    Once you done this and after PO release, system gives below message. System not allowed to change ANYTHING in PO with ME22N. Or else you can set any other relevant change indicator suits you.

  • Can we issue purchase order without price info

    Hi,
    We had issued purchase orders to a vendor, but we come across that price info has not been maintained for the same. It seems that this is exceptional case. Can we issue purchase order without price info ??
    Regards...

    Hi,
    In general case while creating purchase order price is picked up from purchasing info records which are valid , if the info record is not maintained it is picked up from last purchase order.
    But as you said it is purcahse order without info records.
    Options available are;
    You can manually enter the price in the item overview and details will automatically get calculated in item detail of purchase order
    You can mark free delivery indicator in the item overview.
    Thanks,
    Tushar Patankar

  • View sales order net price and relavent putchase order effective price

    I;m using purchase to order sap solution. every sales order has single or multiple purchase orders. I nned to check the putchase order effective price agianst the sales order net price. Can i see both data in sales order, purchase order or any other standard report for this.

    Hi,
    There is no direct way to see sales order net value and purchase order value associated with sales order.
    you can view it by going inside VA02 or VA03 and click on document flow,then SO and P.O net value viewed.
    check t-code ME2K, put sales order number and see
    kapil

  • Purchase Order history is not updated with Invoice number

    Hello Experts ,
    Please suggest some inputs/solution for my problem.
    Scenarios is :
    PO --> SO --> Invoice
    I am creating the invoice with the medium EDI , when I click on Save button IDOC is generated with the message " IDoc 'xxxxxxxxxxxxx' was created and forwarded for transmission " and it showing the status as 03 i.e, The IDoc was sent to an R/3 System or an external program via a transactional RFC ...but the problem is if I got to the Purchase Order history Its not updated with the Invoice number.
    What could be the problem , please suggest.

    Hi!
    I'm not sure, in which process you link PO and SO. There are some different ways, which are totally different scenarios - if you need help here, describe more detailed.
    Your invoice is probably only created with reference to SO, so check the invoice itself. In this case also the SO history should include the invoice.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

    Hi,
    I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
    The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
    As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
    Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys   in chart of accounts WP2P.
    Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
    Please help me how to solve this.
    Regards,
    Rashmi

    Hiya,
    This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
    You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
    VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
    Cheers.

  • While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, please any one help me

    While executing TCode F13 and F13E, purchase order number is not appearing.how it should be displayed into tcode f.13, what are the requirements need to display into tcode f.13, please any one help me, i am facing this problem in  production server

    Hi Nattu,
    Please check it will show the PO no under Purchasing doc field
    Check which layout you are applied.
    its should be
    SAP&F124
    Without Specification of Crcy
    Regd,
    Khan.

  • Purchase Order values are not reflecting in MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    I have changed standared Pricing Procedure from TAXINN to TAXINT because excise calculation was wrong. Now I have assinged new pricing procedure & reflecting in Purchase order & working as per requirement also.But when we are doing MIGO, excise values are not automatically coming in MIGO. So Is there any configuration or missing copy control because i have changed pricing procedure?
    Also I want to put a check, if purchase order value is not matching with vendor invoice value then stores person can't do the MIGO.
    Could any body guide me?
    Thanks
    Trupti

    Hi,                                                                               
    It is not like that you have to mandatory use the TAXINN rather it is recommended by SAP to use but if some business requirement doesnu2019t meet up with what is recommended that its business call to go TAXINJ from TAXINN, but right now we don't know at what circumstances they moved to TAXINJ but question is what are the settings missing while moving from TAXINN to TAXINJ and because of that system is not picking the Tax Values at the time of MIGO in excise capture & posting.
    So I have several questions in mind in order to understand your system behaviour.
    1) Are you using the correct Tax code at PO level?
    2) If using the correct Tax code then is't correct value maintained in FTXP for the Tax code used in PO.
    3) If correct Value maintained in Tax code then by clicking on Taxes button mentioned under PO item level details are you able to see the correct value against each applicable condition type in next screen by clicking over Taxes button in PO?
    4) if not then first check J1id - Material Chapter Id combination, vendor excise indicator mentioned, correct duties maintained in excise duty so check all master data related to CIN maintained in J1id
    So first give answer to above mentioned questions then we procees further but I am sure I can make your system to picked  the correct duties don't worry Just answer my questions hope things become fine in your system.
    Best Regards,
    Silky
    Note: Please assign valuable points in order to encourage contributors to each answer to queries...

  • Purchase Order 4500000 does not exist

    When I am creating Service PO from shipment I am getting the error
    "Purchase order 4500000001  does not exist
    What can be the reason??????????
    Regards.

    Dear All,
    At last the problem has been resolved.
    There was an userexit assigned to the no.range table where the new doc.type was hardcoded to bypass the logic for allotting a PO Number and the problem was resolved.
    Since the problem has been resolved I am closing the thread.
    THANKS EVERYBODY FOR YOUR VALUABLE INPUTS AND SUGGESTION.
    Regards.

  • Formatted Search - Purchase Order Lines, Price Field

    Hello Experts,
    I have wrote this formatted search for Purchase Order Lines, Price Field
    The problem is that i gets 0...
    What is wrong in it?....
    select
    case
    when T2.[ItemCode] Like N'u05D7u05DC%%' AND U_Thickness >= 1 AND U_Thickness <=3 then U_Contour*2.17
    end
    FROM OITM T0
    INNER JOIN ITM1 T1 ON T0.ItemCode = T1.ItemCode
    INNER JOIN POR1 T2 ON T0.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode
    WHERE T2.itemcode = $[$38.1.0[
    Thank You,
    Meital

    Hi.....
    Try this
    select
    case
    when T2.[ItemCode] Like N'u05D7u05DC%%' AND U_Thickness >= 1 AND U_Thickness <=3 then U_Contour*2.17
    end
    FROM OITM T0
    INNER JOIN ITM1 T1 ON T0.ItemCode = T1.ItemCode
    INNER JOIN POR1 T2 ON T0.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode
    WHERE T2.itemcode = $[$38.1.0]
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Purchase Order Carryforward Does Not Net to Zero

    We are working in a year-end test client, copy of Production, in preparation for fiscal year end closing.
    For purchase order carryforwards, we find a number of documents which do not net to zero in the sender year. This seems to occur most often for the case where a line item has split account assignments. In these cases, only one account assignment line is carried forward. The other account assignment lines are ignored.
    This does not occur for all cases where we have split assignments. We have been unable to determine what is unique about the instances where the carryforward does not work properly.
    Our system is R/3, 4.7, support stack 27.
    Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, can you give me any guidance as to how to address it?
    Thank you.

    Hello all. Since i didn't get any replies, I don't know if there is any interest in this. However, for future reference, in case any else encounters this issue and searches the forum, here is the answer which we found:
    FMJ2 and FMJ3 process the carryforwards and reversals in blocks of 2000 lines. At the end of a block, the PO may be split up across blocks, with one or more assignment items processed in the first block, and the remaining items in the next block.
    If you have selected "Block Documents" on the initial screen, when the first item is processed, it locks the PO. When the second block attempts to process the remaining items, there is an error that the PO is locked, and these items are not processed.
    The developer is working on a correction to the code to handle this. In the meantime, there are two workarounds:
    1) Uncheck "Block Documents"
    or
    2) After processing, use FMJ3 to reverse the carryforwards which received the error. Use FMJ2 to carry them forward again, in smaller groups which are not large enough to fill up a 2000 line block, and which therefore do not encounter the problem.

  • In Purchase order history is not showing the Reversal of goods price

    Hello friends,
    I have created a PO , for that i have done the GR and invoice. Now i want to reverse the goods using MType-102, for that i have created the credit memo .
    I have done the reverse GR ,But in Purchase order history the For the GR reversed doc, its showing the price as 0.
    Pl help me out .

    Hi,
    If your forward 101 material document is with price and it is showing in PO history and your reverse 102 material document is not with price in PO history , check the accounting document of 102 and if it is with price , then PO history is not properly updated.also check table EKBE and if po history is not properly updated , check for a relevant note and apply.
    Regards,

  • CRM_IC :: Net Price become zero after EDIT.

    Dear All,
    I am facing a problem that; in the transaction CRM_IC, when I create a Sale Order with one (or more) line item(s) and providing a valid value in the field Net Price. If we save it, it will get saved successfully. But If I press the EDIT button assosiated with the screen, then the Net Price will become zero.
    Also it is observed that, the issue happens for German country and for rest it is working properly
    Can anyboby help me..
    Regards
    Ullas Unnikrishnan

    I solved this --- I noticed that I had siRoot.DocumentGrossAmountsIndicator set to false but creating the root node (newSI = SupplierInvoice.Create(siRoot)) turned that back to true again for no apparent reason. My guess is that having this set to true, i.e. all values are gross, dynamically sets all net fields to read-only. Once I discovered this it was as simple as setting the indicator back to false post-creation of the root node, and then net price fields were accessible again.

Maybe you are looking for