In MIRO posting field DABRZ "Reference Date for Settlement is being require

Help!
For a limited number of MIRO postings, were are getting some hard, looping errors.
At first, MIRO will ask for "Reference Date for Settlement" field DABRZ. Once that is completed, it asks for "Asset value date" field BZDAT. Once that is completed, it asks for "Enter a G/L account". Once that is completed and you hit enter, tab, or even try to go to another tab...The errors start over, asking for the same items that were just completed.
In this particular case, the account assignment is split between 3 different AFEs. All three AFEs are open and have charges posting to them.
Ideas?
Thanks so much!
Amy McRaney

Check any validations exists in OB28. This may be the culprit.

Similar Messages

No reference data for copy function between two infoproviders

Hello,
I am trying to copy data from an actuals cube into a plan cube. Both cubes are assigned to the same multi provider.
The planning function is defined as follows:
Characteristics to be changed: InfoProvider (from: Actual; to: Plan)
Condistions: none
To keep it simple I am using a filter with no entries.
When I am executing the copy function with a trace I find that the function reads the entries from the Plan Cube (which I expected) but it does not generate the entries that are available in the Actuals Cube in the plan cube (which I hoped it would do). It seems that the function cannot find any reference values in the Actuals cube.
The structure of the two cubes is different. Could this be the reason that the copy function does not work?
I will appreciate any hints.
Cheers,
Sven

Hi,
The structure of the cubes being different is not a problem. Anyway, the records get aggregated depending on the characteristics you have included in the aggregation level on which the copy function is created. Because you say not even one record is getting copied from the actuals cube I feel there is some basic problem. Check the below things (some might sound very basic but I am just noting them)
1) Actual cube has data in an active request with green status
2) You have identified the characteristics and key figures properly in the multiprov (on which the aggregation level is built) from both the cubes.
3) In the copy function, you have selected the desired KFs to be copied.

Technical data for planned order dependent requirements .

Dear All,
I have to call the dependent requirements created by MRP run in my report. Can anyone please tell me that where these dependent requirements are stored in the database or is there any function module to get these values?
Thanks.

Dear,
RESB Reservation/Dependent Requirements Link with PBED for FG and SFG releation. Function module MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API
Also refer this link,
Dependent Requirements report required
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Marking Tax W/H screen for W-8 being required

Does anyone know if there is a way to indicate on the tax w/h screen for a vendor, whether or not a W-8 is required for the vendor?
I know in order to actually withhold taxes, the liable flag must be checked, but how do other companies keep up if their vendors need a W-8?
My idea is to create a W/H tax code which means, "Vendor does not require W-8" and not check the liable flag.
Can anyone share how they have handled this issue?
Thanks
Alicia

Hi Faizan,
Have you created a business transaction for Vendor posting in FBCJC2?
Once you have done this, you need to go to FBCJ and run the cash journal.
Enter the Vendor in the line item for whom you are making the payment
You also need to ensure that the WHT tax type and tax code are maintained in vendor master.
Please keep in mind that the WHT type is WHT type for Payment Posting
Hope this helps
Best Regards
PG

SAP GRC 10.1 AMF No data selected when adding duplicate fields from separate tables for configurable data sources

Hi There,
In SAP GRC 10.0, our team had an issue where we could not add duplicate fields from separate table (see ERROR: Select Currency/UoM field for the selected analyzed fields). This was resolved by the SAP Note 1904313/ 1904314 (http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1904313).
We upgraded our system to SAP GRC 10.1 SP05 and could now add the duplicate fields from separate tables. SAP Note 1904313/ 1904314 was part of SAP GRC 10.1 SP03 so it makes sense that we, in a higher version (SP05), would be able to do this.
The issue now is when we add the duplicate fields from different tables and run the Ad-hoc Query to test if the data source works correctly, the No Data Selected warning persists. This means that the data source provides no data for analysis, which is required to write our business rules.
Below is an example:
Basic data source with just one currency reference field EBAN-WAERS.
When you run the Ad-Hoc Query you receive data.
Basic data source with second currency reference field EKKO-WAERS.
When you run the Ad-Hoc Query no data is found.
Please also make reference to the following thread logged by my colleague (ERROR: Select Currency/UoM field for the selected analyzed fields)
Any assistance to receive data with duplicate fields from separate tables will be highly appreciated.
Thanking you in advance.
Regards
Gary Khan

Hi
following are the error messages from dump
hrtText
   There is already a line with the same key.
hat happened?
   Error in ABAP application program.
   The current ABAP program "SAPLCKMS" had to be terminated because one of the
   statements could not be executed.
   This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
rror analysis
   You wanted to add an entry to table "\FUNCTION-POOL=CKMS\DATA=T_DYN_CKMLCR",
    which you declared
   with a UNIQUE KEY. However, there was already an entry with the
   same key.
   This may have been in an INSERT or MOVE statement, or within a
   SELECT ... INTO statement.
   In particular, you cannot insert more than one initial line into a
   table with a unique key using the INSERT INITIAL LINE... statement.
rigger Location of Runtime Error
   Program                                 SAPLCKMS
   Include                                 LCKMSF01
   Row                                     226
   Module type                             (FORM)
   Module Name                             DYNAMIC_PERIOD_CLOSING
Source code where dump ocured
222
223           APPEND ht_ckmlpp TO t_add_ckmlpp.
224           APPEND LINES OF ht_ckmlcr TO t_add_ckmlcr.
225           INSERT ht_ckmlpp INTO TABLE t_dyn_ckmlpp.
>>>>           INSERT LINES OF ht_ckmlcr INTO TABLE t_dyn_ckmlcr.
227         ENDWHILE.
Also I guess there is problem with material ledger in R/3 side
I have never worked on material ledger before so dont hav idea of Tcode and tables in SAP R/3 for material ledger.
Thanks
Navneet

Baseline Date for Due Date Calculation required for S/L indicators

Hello,
Iu2019m facing the following problem
Iu2019m trying to insert an invoice (using a customer master record) but the system blocks me because the field ZFBDT (Baseline Date for Due Date Calculation) is a Required entry.
The strange thing is that if I use a S/L indicators the field is mandatory, if not the date may be defaulted.
I checked in OB41 but there are non differences between Special PK and normal PK.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Alberto

Dear Alberto,
the field "Due On (BSEG-ZFBDT)" cannot be controlled with field status.
It is controlled by field attribute of screen painter (Tcd: SE51). If
you look at element attribute for "Due On" field, a flag for required
entry is activated. In this case, field status has no control over
the field.
As of release 3.1G, field BSEG-ZFBDT is hardcoded in most FI screens
to be mandatory and cannot be influenced by any field status
changes. This situation is only valid when posting with special G/L
indicator (ie PK 29/39).
SAP development team has determined that this is a critical field. The
reason behind this is that this special GL screen and the data entered
here are very important to many other programs. This data affects
liabilities and receivables where due date is necessary almost
everytime. Thus, we changed this field in this screen in order to
prevent problems in many other areas. The reason is explained further
in note 95079.
I hope this helps You.
mauri

Distribute data by reference data

Hi,
requirment as follow:
1actual sale data cube (reference data)
0plant 0article year/week acturalsalesdata
D001     00010     2007/01     100.00
D002     00010     2007/01     200.00
D001     00010     2007/02     150.00
D002     00010     2007/02     250.00
2planned sales data cube (data to be changed)
0article year/week acturalsalesdata
00010 2007/03     400.00
I want to distribute the planned sales data in 2007/03 to each plant.
In the distribution function I choose the field 'year/week' as 'fields for reference'
then in the parameter group I can specify which week to be the reference week.
But in the parameter group I can only choose single value (2007/01 or 2007/02),
How could I use both of these week as reference data?
for example :
0plant   0article year/week                    acturalsalesdata
D001   00010   2007/01 and 2007/02    100.00 + 150.00
D002   00010   2007/01 and 2007/02     200.00 + 250.00

Hello
Yes, distribution reference data needs to be restricted to a single value.
Two ways I have done this before:
1. Use a planning sequence where the first step is to copy your 2 weeks of reference data into a spare version and combine into a single period. Then use this as reference data for the dustribution function. A third step can be added if needed to delete the copied data in the spare version.
2. You can generally get to the same thing using FOX formula but can get complex. Whether the planning sequence or formula approach ends up being more efficient in execution time depends on the data, complexity of function etc...
Chris

Foreign Trade / Custom data for local Client

Hi SD's,
I've an issue regarding the creation of Billing document, because for a local Client it is asking me for this data.
We've a 3 scenarios working:
1- Normal sales inside the country for a certain Order Type - ZA, Delivery Type - ZA and Billing doc Type - ZA. Flow works ok.
2- Export sales - flow work ok and the user as to fill Foreign Trade / Custom data (using the same documents types as above);
3- Intermediation - for local client or to export, here is where the system fails when we've local Client it still ask for Foreign Trade / Custom data and it should not. In this scenario we are using Order Type - ZB, Delivery Type - ZB and Billing doc Type - ZB and we've CO-PA for this scenario.
I think this may be related because before we've this scenario integrating with CO-PA everything worked perfect.
Does anyone have a clue on this?
I've read some notes regarding Foreign Trade / Custom data but none of them seam to answer my problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
BO.

Hi bruno
It is in copy control VTLA and in VTFL also . select your order type and delivery type and click on blue lens on top left. There try to maintain as follows:-
Order requirements:::::::001
Combination requirmt::::051
Header Data:::::::::::::::::001
Similarly, go to VTFL, select your delivery type and billing type and click on blue lens on top left. There for the field Determine export data, maintain as per your requirement and for Copying requirements, maintain routine 003.
Regards
Srinath

File Reference Data

HI!
Is there a way to access a file reference data?, or do I have
to upload de file to the server and the download it in order to get
the file data (This sounds so much as overkilling).
Also, is there a way to store the file reference data for
future use, lest say I wish to keep the file reference data so my
flash applicaction can access the same file in the future, can sore
this, lest say in a server database or something?
I hope people form adobe could answer this :)
Thanks

Peter,
Thanks for taking your time to discus about this issue. I've
always liked the approach flash has had to protect personal data,
or to be more specific to completely separate Internet form the
local PC environment. And the proof that you guys are on the right
track is that there are no FLASH viruses yet.
Still, and if it's possible I would like to make a few
suggestions that shouldn't affect the security model but
definatelly improve the way FLASH communicates with the server:
1.- Access a File Reference locally, I'm not talking about
accessing any file on the local PC but the one the user manually
selected for lets say an upload (Básicaly add an open command
to fileReference), this would be very usefull since will allow the
SWF to process the file before sending it, wich for example will
allow to change an image size before upload or to process a text
file and upload only the results of this process. I don't see how
this could be a security risk since you are able to do this with
the server and a huge everhead today.
2.- Been able to store the file Reference, again without
accessing the PATH of the file, but the file reference object
itself will be most useful to for lots applications, you don't need
to have access to a directory structure but be able to access a
file previously selected by the user. Just a while ago I wrote a
flex application that uploaded a single file to a server every
hour. I was able to store in a shared object all the paramenters a
user selected for the upload except for the file reference. This
meas that the user has to select the file every time it opens the
application.

BI Reporting Requirement which requires Supplier Transmission date for a PO

Hi Experts,
I have BI requirement which demands the usage of field "Supplier Transmission date for a purchase order ie the date on which the PO is actally transmitted from SAP system.The IDOC relevant to PO will give the date.But is there any table which records the IDOC details relevant to a specific PO.Please let me know the table which gives the information of IDOC relevant a PO .
Regards,
Meera

Hi Meera
I have little info about this but i dont know upto what extent it will help you ..
Coming to the point i believe you to enhance the structure related to 0BBP_PO_TD_SC_1 for PO item level info
Actually This POs are generated in BBP_SC transaction in that the screen info is avilable about the IDOC from that you have drill down for exact table and field names.
Let us wait for more inputs from our SDN viewers.
Thanks
(P159793)K M R
**Assigning points is the only way of saying thanks in SDN***
>
Meera wrote:
> Hi Experts,
> I have BI requirement which demands the usage of field "Supplier Transmission date for a purchase order ie the date on which the PO is actally transmitted from SAP system.The IDOC relevant to PO will give the date.But is there any table which records the IDOC details relevant to a specific PO.Please let me know the table which gives the information of IDOC relevant a PO .
>
> Regards,
> Meera

MDM Reference Data

Hi all,
I have a question regarding reference data in MDM. The business scenario is that we are using MDM to consolidate Master Data for Materials across 3 SAP ERP systems. We are using standard Business Content delivered with MDM for out Repository, which includes all the customizing tables (that are standard in ERP) as flat table lookups.
The question I have is should we:
1) Populate the lookup tables will all the possible values for each of the 3 ERP system customizing tables.
2) Do we define a set of consolidated lookup values in MDM first for each ERP customizing table and then value map the legacy value to correct consolidated value on import.
E.G Material Group has Values Mat1, MatGrp1, and Group1 across each of the 3 systems. Do we populate the material group lookup table with all these values?
or do we create on value "Mat Group 1" and value map the above 3 values to this new material group value?
How does our decision effect Syndication and/or Central Master Data Management (create and up in MDM Materials for ERP system)?
All help appreciated!
Regards
Con

Hello Con,
If you have a look at the IDoc / XML messages that are send from one SAP system to another, you'll see that these messages do mainly consist of codes instead of speaking names. so if you plan the syndication / central data maintenance, you must have the correct, remote system dependent keys in MDM!
In your example if you would send Material Group "Mat1" to an ERP system that has code "MatGrp1" for this Material Group, the ALE inbound will fail because it is not able to assign the correct material group.
Regarding your possibilities:
1) Is always the easiest way to go. You can load the reference data for all remote systems into MDM. So you can be sure that you have all required keys in MDM. Nevertheless, if you do this, you should have a look at the look up tables after the data load. The reason is that you may have typos in the description of the values, thus you might have entries for "MaterialGroup" and "Material Group". When creating new records in MDM, this can be very confusing. So it makes sense to consolidate the data after the load.
2) You could do this, too. But in this case, you'd have to do a lot of value mapping during the import. And you have to know exactly which key information belongs to which look up value.
From my experience the first way is the one easier to go. You have the effort only once and you do not have to touch the object import afterwards.
Kind regards
Michael

Cellular Data for iTunes Match but not for app updates

In iOS7 we can now have App updates downloaded automatically. Great. But if I want to use cellular data to stream songs from my iTunes Match library in iCloud when I'm on the road, but don't want to waste cellular data on App updates how can I do this? It appears that enabling cellular data for iTunes Match also requires using cellular data for any of the four auto download features as well in Settings>iTunes & App Store. Am I seeing this correctly and is there a way to fix this? I don't want to use cellular data for app updates, just for iTunes Match streaming. Any help would be great.

This looks like the same problem I've come across. From what I have been told, they are not separate, ie if you enable use cellular data to stream songs from iTunes Match you also have to download updated apps if you have it set to automatically download them.
I think this should definitely be separated.
The other thing you could do it go to another streaming music provider and then turn cellular downloads off. That's what I'm looking at doing.

:Due On" date field missing while posting with Spl GL indicator for vendor

Hello,
I am facing a problen while posting a n entry with spl GL indicator in fb01, the issue is Due On date field is missing in the screen.
I am posting an spl GL transaction for a vendor thro FB01 and after entering the posting key 39, vendor code and spl Gl indicator in line item and in next screen, the "Due ON" date field is not appearing.
Both vendor recon account and spl GL alternative account use same field status group and checked the field status group , the due date, payments terms are made optional.
The strange thing is, when I use the same vendor with Spl GL indicator "A" , the Due ON field is missing in next screen, and when I use spl indicator " B" , for same vendor, Due On date field is appearing.
Is there any specfic field status setting for DUE ON date field for Spl GL indicator wise? or please help me how to bring due on date field in the screen when posting spl GL transaction?
Please help me on this.
Regards
Surya

Hello Surya,
To make field baseline date for payment (BSEG-ZFBDT) ready for input for
posting the down payment, the following Customizing setting is
necessary:
Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable ->
Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payment
-> Payment Method/Bank Selection -> Configure payment program -> All
company codes -> double-click on corresponding company code -> under
Customer -> 'Sp. G/L transactions to be paid' the letter A should be
entered.
The field "Due On (BSEG-ZFBDT)" cannot be controlled with field status.
It is contolled by field attribute of screen painter (Tcd: SE51). If
you look at element attribute for "Due On" field, a flag for required
entry is activated. In this case, field status has no control over
the field.
As of release 3.1G, field BSEG-ZFBDT is hardcoded in most FI screens
to be mandatory and cannot be influenced by any field status
changes. This situation is only valid when posting with special G/L
indicator (ie PK 29/39).
SAP development team has determined that this is a critical field. The
reason behind this is that this special GL screen and the data entered
here are very important to many other programs. This data affects
liabilities and receivables where due date is necessary almost
everytime. Thus, we changed this field in this screen in order to
prevent problems in many other areas. The reason is explained further in
note 95079.
545944    FAQ, down payment, tax code, baseline date
above Field is controlled through SE51 only.
Tcode : SE51
Program (screen)     SAPMF05A
Screen number        304
Eliment list press display.
special attributes.
BSEG-ZFBDT - Required.
Other options are below.
     The attribute "Input" can have the following values:
     o    Not possible
         The input/output field cannot be supplied with an input - that
         the screen element can only be used for outputs.
     o   Possible
         The input/output field can be supplied with an input at runtime
         the remainder of the transaction, an input is not required.
     o   Recommended (Optional Field)
         The input/output field should be supplied with an input at runt
         The system, of course, does not check immediately whether there
         been an input. During the remainder of the transaction, however
         input is necessary.
         To mark this kind of target field, the input template starts wi
         special character that is represented in the Screen Painter by
         question mark ('?'). The question mark will be suppressed only
         the field is in a table control or a step loop.
         You use the "target field", for example, if inputs cover severa
         screens and only at a later stage are subject to a common check
o   Required Field
    The input/output field must be supplied with an input at runtime.
    The system checks this property immediately, and very definitely
    when the event is processed (PROCESS AFTER INPUT).
    So that such a required field is marked accordingly, its input
    template must begin with a special character that is represented in
    the Screen Painter by a question mark ('?'). The question mark is
    suppressed only if the field is in a table control or a step loop.
I hope above information will resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Fernando Evangelista

Ensure field sequence is correct for data for mutiple source structure

Hi,
I'm using LSMW with IDOC message type 'FIDCC2' Basic type 'FIDCCP02'.
I'm getting error that packed fields are not permitted.
I'm getting Ensure field sequence is correct for data for mutiple source structures.
Source Structures
       HEADER_STRUCT            G/L Account Document Header
           LINE_STRUCT              G/L Account Document Line
Source Fields
       HEADER_STRUCT             G/L Account Document Header
           BKTXT                          C(025)    Document Header Text
           BLART                          C(002)    Document Type
           BLDAT                          DYMD(008) Document Date
           BUDAT                          DYMD(008) Posting Date
           KURSF                          C(009)    Exchange rate
           WAERS                          C(005)    Currency
           WWERT                          DYMD(008) Translation Date
           XBLNR                          C(016)    Reference
           LINE_STRUCT               G/L Account Document Line
               AUFNR                          C(012)    Order
               HKONT                          C(010)    G/L Account
               KOSTL                          C(010)    Cost Center
               MEINS                          C(003)    Base Unit of Measure
               MENGE                          C(013)    Quantity
               PRCTR                          C(010)    Profit Center
               SGTXT                          C(050)    Text
               SHKZG                          C(001)    Debit/Credit Ind.
               WRBTR                          AMT3(013) Amount
I have changed PAC3 field for caracters fields of same length to avoid erreur message of no packed fields allowed.
Structure Relations
       E1FIKPF FI Document Header (BKPF)         <<<< HEADER_STRUCT G/L Account Document Header
               Select Target Structure E1FIKPF .
           E1FISEG FI Document Item (BSEG)          <<<< LINE_STRUCT   G/L Account Document Line
               E1FISE2 FI Document Item, Second Part of E1FISEG   (BSEG)
               E1FINBU FI Subsidiary Ledger (FI-AP-AR) (BSEG)
           E1FISEC CPD Customer/Vendor (BSEC)
           E1FISET FI Tax Data (BSET)
           E1FIXWT Extended Withholding Tax (WITH_ITEM)
Files
       Legacy Data          On the PC (Frontend)
           File to read GL Account info   c:\GL_Account.txt
                                          Data for Multiple Source Structures (Sequential Files)
                                          Separator Tabulator
                                          Field Names at Start of File
                                          Field Order Matches Source Structure Definition
                                          With Record End Indicator (Text File)
                                          Code Page ASCII
       Legacy Data          On the R/3 server (application server)
       Imported Data        File for Imported Data (Application Server)
           Imported Data                  c:\SYNERGO_CREATE_LCNA_FI_GLDOC_CREATE.lsmw.read
       Converted Data       File for Converted Data (Application Server)
           Converted Data                 c:\SYNERGO_LCNA_FI_GLDOC_CREATE.lsmw.conv
       Wildcard Value       Value for Wildcard '*' in File Name
Source Structures and Files
       HEADER_STRUCT G/L Account Document Header
                     File to read GL Account info c:\GL_Account.txt
           LINE_STRUCT G/L Account Document Line
                       File to read GL Account info c:\GL_Account.txt
File content:
Document Header Text     Document Type     Document Date     Posting Date     Exchange rate     Currency     Translation Date     Reference
G/L Account document     SA     20080401     20080409     1.05     CAD     20080409     Reference
Order     G/L Account     Cost Center     Base Unit of Measure     Quantity     Profit Center     Text     Debit/Credit Ind.     Amount
     44000022                    1040     Line item text 1     H     250
     60105M01     13431     TO     10          Line item text 2     S     150
800000     60105M01                         Line item text 3     S     100
     60110P01     6617     H     40          Line item text 4     S     600
     44000022                    ACIBRAM     Line item text 5     H     600
The file structure is as follow
Header titles
Header info
Line titles
Line1 info
Line2 info
Line3 info
Line4 info
Line5 info
Could someone direct me in the wright direction?
Thank you in advance!
Curtis

Hi,
Thank you so much for yout reply.
For example
i have VBAK(Heder structure)
          VBAP( Item Structure)
My file should be like this i think
Identification content         Fieldnames
     H                               VBELN      ERDAT     ERNAM
                                      Fieldvalues for header
      H                              1000          20080703   swapna
Identification content         Fieldnames
    I                                   VBELP     AUART
                                      Fieldvalues for item
    I                                  001             OR
                                       002             OR
Is this format is correct.
Let me know whether i am correct or not

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

In MIRO posting field DABRZ "Reference Date for Settlement is being require

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for