In-transit shipment

All experts, I am new to SAP functional area. I am looking for a standard BAPI/RFC that will get me all in-transit shipments. Is it available and if so what is the name of the BAPI ? Or a custom one needs to be written?
Any one there to help this poor soul ?
Thanks in advance for you help

Hi Art,
ProcessWeaver multi-carrier Global Enterprise Centralized Shipping (ECS) certified by around 25 carriers including FedEx, UPS as well as SAP NetWeaver.
You can print FedEx labels, package dimensions, rates, real time tracking within SAP System.
Best Regards,
Prasad

Similar Messages

Standard BAPI/RFC for in-transit shipments

All experts, I am new to SAP functional area. I am looking for a standard BAPI/RFC that will get me all in-transit shipments. Is it available and if so what is the name of the BAPI ? Or a custom one needs to be written?
Thanks in advance for you help

can u give us the transaction for that
cheers
s.janagar

New export declaration after cancellation

Hello,
I've got the following problem and hopefully someone is possible to find a solution to the problem:
An export declaration is build by an F2. Afterwards the declaration is cancelled on GTS side manually. The actual status in CUHD field PROST is 4B (cancelled). On refer to the same delivery a new F8 is build to create a new declaration but failed. It cannot be transfered to GTS (SM58 process is allready existing with... ). The previous declaration is successfully cancelled, what might be the problem? Is there any idea?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Astrid

Hi Astrid,
I took a look at the code... The check works something like this:
The system tries to find any existing Customs Documents having the Billing Document as a header reference.
If any documents are found, they are checked for Status. Any with status '4B' ("cancelled") are ignored.
If any documents remain, the item-level references are considered. If there are any matches, then the new transfer is rejected. Otherwise, the transfer is allowed.
I wonder; was the Export Declaration the only document created from the first transfer, or did the system perhaps also create a Transit Shipment? If so, that too must be cancelled to allow the new transfer.
Does that help?
Regards,
Dave

Ownership, In-Transit for Direct Shipments

Hello SAP SD Gurus,
My question is about to the Cross-Company Direct Shipment process, related to incoterms, ownership, and In-transit (visibility).
A: Customer
B: Selling Plant (Germany)
C: Supplying Plant (China)
A sends a PO to B – B sends a Sales Order to C to ship to A with Incoterm DDP. DDP signifies “ownership belongs to B until the material arrives at the customer’s door”. Our Finance people want to have visibility of this product in B’s in-transit until it’s delivered to the customer.
How is this possible without creating a virtual plant, or Sloc? How do we have visibility at the material level, with value?
Rico92

Hello Santosh,
Customer Service resides in B so they will initiate the Sales Order to ship directly to A from C’s stock. C will then bill B, and in turn, B will bill A.
Thank you for your reply!
Rico

How to receive intransit shipments for inter-organization transfer with in-transit receipt routing via Receiving Open Interface

Somebody have samples about how to fill the ROI tables only to have the receipt from inter-organization transfer with in-transit routing.
Thanks in advance.

Pl. visit following links.
Oracle Apps: 11.5.10 / R12 ROI How to Receive Intransit Shipment (Inter-org transfer) for Lot / Serial Controlled Items …
11.5.10 ROI를 통해 INTRANSIT SHIPMENT(INTER-ORG TRANSFER)를 처리하는 방법

Transit Time determination based on special process indicator - Shipment Process

Hello,
I want to add 5 days more to transit time (which is getting picked from route) when I use special process indicator as PTL (Partial Truck Load) while doing shipment. Is this possible ?
Please let me know if this can be done in SAP.

Hi,
Both planning (MRP) and ATP is carried out at plant level in ECC6.0 (standard system). If you want to optimize your process above plant level you should use SAP APO (in my opinion).
Regards,
Csaba

MacBook Pro Delivery "In Transit to Customer - Shipment Delayed" - what does this mean?

Hi everyone,
I ordered my 15" MBP on the 23rd (the only modification was an antiglare screen rather than the standard). The order status originally said delivery would be from the 4th-8th January but it later amended to the 2nd. Now when I look at the page it says "In Transit to Customer - Shipment Delayed" but still says the same estimated delivery date. I wondered whether anyone could shed any light into what this actually means?
Thanks.

That's what I was hoping but I wondered whether anyone has had this message before? I'm hoping the estimated delivery date is still correct.

Sales order is not taking shipping transit lead time into consideration

Hi,
We have following scenario -
1. Sales order is created in AT organization.
2. There is no onhand in any of the organizations including AT.
3. The scheduled ship date for sales order comes as order creation date + item lead time = 15-Sep-2011.
3. PO for sufficient quantity is available at UK org with need-by date as 01-Jun-2011.
5. Post processing item lead time for this item is 1 day.
4. intransit shipment is setup between UK and AT.
5. Shipment Transit lead times are also set up at 3 days between locations of UK and AT.
6. ASCP plan is run.
7. Sales Order is unscheduled and rescheduled via API MSC_ATP_PUB, which takes the ATP details from UK (based on the sourcing rules). The sheduled ship date comes as 02-Jun-2011 (PO need-by date + 1 day of post processing).
8. Expectation is that API should also take transit lead time into consideration while calculating the ATP dates and hence the Expectation is that scheduled ship date should come as 05-Jun-2011 (PO need-by date + Transit lead time + 1 day of post processing).
Please let me know
a. if this is standard functionality of oracle or not.
b. if this is standard functionality then what setups are missing required for the same to be achieved.
UAT is held up for this issue. Please help urgently.
Regards.

Oracle is supposed to take the in-transit time into consideration.
Are you running a constrained plan or an unconstrained one?
Make sure you defined the inter-org network as described in http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/A60725_05/html/comnls/us/inv/shipne01.htm.
or go to Inventory > Setup > Organization > Inter-Location Transit Times and enter it there.
Sandeep Gandhi

Transportation cost before the reception of the material in MIGO (Stock in transit)

Does it exist a way to make a reception of materials in transit and post the transportation cost before the reception of the material in MIGO ?
The material is own of company before to be receipt in plant. We need to pay the transportation before that material is arrived at plant.
As the value is an important cost, we need that this cost be linked with the cost of the material. We can put a condition, but it does not work if the material in not receipt in MIGO. We can enter a subsequent debit memo, but the invoice of the reception should be enter in the system and by the way the reception too. So how should we process to link the transportation cost with the material if this material is not received at plant and by the way in MIGO.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
As of my knowledge, system will allow to process the shipment document - create shipment cost document and vendor invoice also, even before doing GR for the PO. Please check the scenario and revert back if you are getting any error.
If you want the shipment cost as delivery cost, refer the note: 427944 - Info: Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt
Regards,
AKPT

Shipment Cost Allocation

Dear Guru's
I have following schema for shipment cost document.
Schema Contains YFRD - Fixed Cost                  10,000
                              YTD - Transit Damage             -1,000 (this value is allocated to delivery-item- material wise)
                              YTL - Transit Loss                     -500 (this value is allocated to delivery-item- material wise)
                                Total Amount                          8,500
Now please tell me:
1) Can we transfer YTD and YTL to other GL and YFRD to other GL?? I have search it but total amount is transferring to net value and GL is hit with NET VALUE.
2) Can I exlude values of both YTD and YTL condition from NET VALUE?? We want to maintain it in shipment cost document but do not want to include it in NET VALUE.
Hope you guys understand and reply at earliest.
Regards,
Rashid Masood

Thanks for your reply..
PGI was done and shipment is received at customer location then customer has claimed that 2 ctns are damaged or loss amounting to Rs. 1000 and 500 respectively and our sales team generated claim order and post Rs. 1500/- in claim GL account.
Now we want to knock off that GL. One thing is that we can knock off at the time of MIRO. But then we are unable to check the material wise damages and losses.. Therefore I have asked 2 question. 1) for YTD and YTL value should be record in claim GL account and 2) YTD and YTL value that are maintained in Cost Document but should not part of NET VALUE.
Hope you understand now.
Regards,
Rashid Masood

Use the Transit Times of route stages ?

Hello. I would like to now if I somehow can use the transit time of the route stages instead of the header route transit time to reflect correct ATP. Current SAP is 4.7.
Business Scenario behind my request is mainly for Ocean Liner Shipments:
For Liner shipments most of the times there are fixed sailing Days ( i.e. every Friday ).
Here I use a route with two stages:
Shipping point to port of depature
Port of depature to final destination port.
As a possible solution I thought to use a Transportation connection point in between which should reflect the waiting time at the port having a factory calendar behind. But during first testing I recognized that any time specific date in the route stages are not take into calculation when creating a sales order ?
Help please !
Thanks
Joerg

I think the sales order picks up the time and dates from header of the route and applies stages and leg determination during shipment creation depending upon your shipment doc. type settings, hence, I think doesnt add stage values during order creation.
If I understand the problem right, perhaps a user exit or something can help you get the days to next Friday to add to the transportation lead time and get to the right dates. Check if this idea can help.

Delivery and Shipment Scheduling with CPS

Dear Experts,
I am tryijng to explore configurable process scheudling in APO to realize a business need of scheduling based on means of transport which in itself is conditional upon a couple of things..one of which is difference between RDD and order date. The purpose is to schedule "fast" or "slow" depending on certain criteria like order priority.. rather than having to live with a static TRANSIT times. Transit times itself can be highly variable talking of ocean shipments with transhipments etc being common and thats where the emphasis lies. I am not talking here of what if product is not available etc at this point (ATP) I am only interested in determining the material availability date and hence the ability to derive a more realistic unloading date given that I have some extenal feed of transit times.expected and actual (post facto)
Quesiton:
- Does this sound possible with configurable process scheduling
- If so... pointers would be appreciated.
Regards,
Loknath

Loknath
The condition table technique within CPS is almost exactly similar to the basic condition technique for transportation and shipment scheduling within GATP.
The only difference is that CPS is a lot more flexible - Instead of fixed activities for PICK/TRAN/etc, you can add more activities (HOLD/etc). In addition to duration determination, CPS can also do calendar determination/ time zone determination/ location determination using the condition technique.
So in either case, you still have the same limitations of condition tables - you cant have 'nested' logic and nor can the system pick the 'best' option.
TP/VS offers dynamic route determination. I believe this is still within the GATP check, but I could be wrong. See if it meets your requirement.
Rishi

Issue in GI for shipment for movement type 161 for vendor returns

Hi Guru's,
When we try to make the Goods Issue for the shipment in VT12...I'm geting a error message as
"Combination of Movement type/Special stock/ stock type is not possible".
And also FYI..the delivery in the shipmet was completley picked and packed and loaded.
Please Advice.

Check following SAP Notes:
- Note 1090988 - Pooling: Quality inspection for return delivery not possible
Symptom - You run the ADEC special pooling process for a material in which master inspection setup is maintained.
The error message M7 361 occurs: Combination of movement type/special stock/stock type is not possible. No inspection lot can be created by goods movement receipt (GR) for pooled stock.
Reason and Prerequisites - It is not planned to deal with ADEC pooling order with quantity inspection lot. The relevant Customizing entries are missing for this process.
Solution - Refer SAP Note 1090988
- Note 376615 - M7001: MEU5 xx 01 is missing in table T156M
Symptom - During goods receipt to a stock transport order with returns item, the system generates message M7001:
'Please check table T156M: entry MEU5 xx 01 does not exist'. or message M7361: 'Combination of movement type/special stock/stock type not possible'. The system displays the error message if you want to post the returns item from the stock in quality inspection, from the restricted-use stock or from the blocked stock to the stock in transit.
Cause - The entry is missing in the standard system
Solution - Refer SAP Note 376615
Also, check Allowed Transaction & Reversal & Follow-on M Type node in Tcode OMJJ for M Type 161
Thanks & Regards
JP

TNT shipment tracking woes - familiar?

(Because the other thread is huge)
Ordered my MacBook online on 28th May (Sunday), and was given a delivery date of 7th June. I can track the shipment fine through TNT. Only problem is, it's the 6th of June and the status hasn't changed since June 1st. It's still in China:
Pick up date 31 May 2006
Destination Edinburgh
Delivery Date
Signatory
Date Time Location Status
01 Jun 2006 20:40 Suzhou Shipped From Originating Depot
31 May 2006 19:20 Suzhou Consignment Received At Transit Point
Two phonecalls to TNT yielded the same answer: the last place it was scanned was the depot in China and it's still on schedule for delivery on the 7th, so it should be fine. Now I'm no expert on the logistics of international shipping, but it strikes me as highly unlikely that TNT will be able to get my MacBook from China to Scotland inside a day and a half when it normally seems to take them a week and a half.
Has anyone else had (or is having) a similar experience?
MacBook 2.0 Ghz (white) Mac OS X (10.4.6) (Somewhere in a TNT depot in China)

Well,
first shipping: Ordered May 23rd, shipped May 26th, Receiced May 30th. Tracking was wonderful.
second shipping (a replacement unit): Ordered May 31st, Shipped June 3rd, tracking is: hold back due to technical problems since June 4th.
TNT says it is not in China anymore, but can't tell me when it will be deliverd.
They say it is scheduled for the 9th (but no guarantee).
Apple's web site says meanwhile: June 10th (a Saturday, not sure
if TNT will deliver Apple packages on a saturday). Moreover, by telephone Apple allows delivery till june 13th (tuesday).
So, it is not only TNT which is annoying, it is Apple,too -
when it comes to delivery status information. It seems to
me that my replacement unit will take longer than my original purchase
Regards,
Dirk
PB17" / MacMini PPC1.25 Mac OS X (10.4.6)
PB17" / MacMini PPC1.25 Mac OS X (10.4.6)
PB17" / MacMini PPC1.25 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Intrastat Drop Shipment

Hello,
we have the following scenario, which is a Drop Shipment.
Goods recipient (and ByD user): located in UK (EU)
Supplier is located in Switzerland (Non-EU)
Ship-from location (direct to UK): is in Germany (EU)
Question 1: Is this a Intrastat relevant process for UK?
Question 2: What is the trigger here: Money (from CH) or Goods (Germany)?
Question 3: Assuming, it is INTRASTAT relevant, how needs the inbound confirmation (or any other posting) to be done, that this transaction will be craped by a INTRASTAT declaration run?
Thanks and best regards
Marco

Hi Marco,
My personal opinion is that the flow described by you is not Intrastat relevant, since Switzerland is not an “Intrastat” country.
In the form you made the second question, I think that the event's trigger there should be “Money”, or better where the Supplier is located (business residence of the company - CH) since you need to declare goods:
bought or sold
transferred within the same legal entity
sent for process
sent as part of a contract for services
supplied free of charge
on long-term hire, loan or lease
to be installed or used in construction
lost or destroyed - if goods dispatched from the UK are lost or destroyed in transit they should be recorded on the supplementary declarations, this does not apply to arrivals
between EU member states (and that is not the case).
The ship-from location (Germany) should not be relevant because
“You don’t have to declare certain other movements of goods. These include goods in transit, goods sent or returned after repair and goods being moved temporarily within the EU.”
Hope this helps you,
Best Regards,
Antonio

In-transit shipment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for