Ownership, In-Transit for Direct Shipments

Hello SAP SD Gurus,
My question is about to the Cross-Company Direct Shipment process, related to incoterms, ownership, and In-transit (visibility).
A: Customer
B: Selling Plant (Germany)
C: Supplying Plant (China)
A sends a PO to B – B sends a Sales Order to C to ship to A with Incoterm DDP. DDP signifies “ownership belongs to B until the material arrives at the customer’s door”. Our Finance people want to have visibility of this product in B’s in-transit until it’s delivered to the customer.
How is this possible without creating a virtual plant, or Sloc? How do we have visibility at the material level, with value?
Rico92

Hello Santosh,
Customer Service resides in B so they will initiate the Sales Order to ship directly to A from C’s stock. C will then bill B, and in turn, B will bill A.
Thank you for your reply!
Rico

Similar Messages

Price Variance does not get calculated for Direct shipment orders

Hi,
During a Direct Shipment when the GRN is entered it Debits the Cost of sales and credits the GR/IR Account which is correct but my problem is when there is price difference in PO and material the difference instead of going to a Variance account it debits the entire value to cost of Sales.
But the Cost in Material Master flows PA. This is causing a difference between PA and FI.
Could some help to solve the above
Thanks in Advance
Roville

HI
SET TOLERANCE LIMITS FOR PURCHASE REQUISITION UNDER THE DEFINE DOCUMENTS FOR PR
AFTER SETTING TOLERANCE LIMITS WHILE CREATING PURCHASE U WILL GET BASED ON TOLERANCE LIMITS THERE FOUR WAYS TO SET TOLERANCE LITS
1
ABSOLUTE VALUE
2
PERCANTAGE
3
TOTAL PO VALUE
4
QUANITY BASED PRICE PER UNIT
OK BYE

Process demand for third party direct shipment

Hello ,
I need help in below given areas. in our rollout client is given statement of work like this.
1)     Demand transfer to vendors
2)     Reminder processing
3)     Process demand for third party direct shipment
Please can you explain me about these area, how it works with example. it is very benificial for us.
Regards
sapman

Hi Sapera,
There can be 3 typse of trading scenarios
1. 3rd party with Shipping notification : Where in u create sales order and create PO against the PR which si triggered in SAles order adn hen MIGO followed by MIRO and Billing. Here Billing to the end customer can be doen before MIRO because the billign quantity considered is based on the goods Receipt( MIGO) quantity. Many a times you might have your personnels or soem mechanisms to cross verify the delivered quanity as some times the vendor might not dispatch the quantiy in the PO. Here the MIGO doen si consumption posting/Non valuated GR as physically it doenot come into your stock and therefore is not shown in our stock. ITem category used in TAS
2. 3rd party without shiiping notfication ; Here MIGO is not done and billig ncan be done only after MIRO as the billing quantity is based on the Invocie receipt quantity in MIRO
3. Bought in items/ Dealer Sales : Here you bring in the materials from the vendor to our depot plant and then dispatch it to the customer . Here PR is geenrated from sales order followed by PO and MIGO. After MIGO you have to do PGI followed by Billing. MIRO doesnot have any impact on the PGI or Billing. Item category used is TAB
But in all the three instancesthe configurational changes happen in schedule line cateogry and the account assignment which is maintiend in item category and for automatic determination of 2 different schedule line categories we need to maintian 2 different item categories alothough item category settings are almost the same.
Hope this was helpful in giving you some insights on the trading processes
Regards,
Nithin

Stock in transit for a particular date

Hi all,
How to find the stock in transit for a particular date.
In MB5T date option is not available.
Is there any other way or i need to gofor Z development.
Kindly help me in this regard.
Regards
KK

Try MB5TD. Please also check OSS notes 1120843, 1268193, 925384.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 22, 2009 8:28 AM

Getting error while creating PO for direct material in SRM 7.0

While creating PO in SRM for direct material,i am getting the error as :Backend error-No Funds center entered/derivedin item 00001(3000/2211100).Please suggest me the solution

Hi,
We are using PPS functionality with SRM 7.0
Regards,
Gopal
Edited by: gopalthadi on Feb 9, 2011 5:01 PM

Stock in transit for Stock transfer report

HI
Do we have any standard reports for Stock in Transit for Stock transfers (like what we have MB5T for STO) ?
When we do a transfer using 303 mvt type we see stock in transit in MARC-UMLMC do we have any other standard report which can provide a document number and the stock in transit qty
Thanks
K

Hi,
You can see through MBSU.
& MB51 is Report.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jul 2, 2010 9:33 AM

Dispatch Instructions for Direct Supply from Vendor to Customer.

Dear Experts,
Our Company is Project Industry. We have implmented SAP ECC 6.0 in 2008 with SD, FI, MM, PP, QM, PS, DMS modules.
In our case 70% Deliveries to customer are from direct dispatch from our vendor to Client. Steps are as follows.
1. Buyer issues PO to vendor for direct dispatch to customer. After readiness of material vendor gives Inspection call to Buyer.
2. Buyer creates inspection notification using T-code QM01.
3. Quality department visit the vendors place, inspect the material & clears the inspection notification.
4. After acceptance of material, Project Execution issues Dispatch instructions to vendor with PO No. & Item details. This is Outside SAP in MS word.
5. Vendor Supplies the material to Customer based on dispatch instructions.l
6. After receipt of dispatch document from vendor, Buyer creates Goods Receipt w.r.t. Purchase order in MIGO. We have Put ABAP check for GR creation to check Accepted Quantity of Inspection notification of that PO line item.
Now our Management wants to Implement above Step No. 4 of creation of dispatch instructions in SAP. At the time of creation dispatch instructions, system shall check if inspection notification is created & allow the creation for accepted PO line item quantity in the notification & only after the inspection notification is closed in SAP . Dispatch instructions should have information such as PO No., Line item no., Material Code, Material Description & quantity to be dispatch, Vendor Name, Project Name.
As per my knowledge in Standard SAP Dispatch Instructions Process is not there.
Request you to give your valuable opinion.

dispatch instructions can be put into a long text at header or item level, just depends if they are item specific or apply to all items of the PO.
if you do this after the initial PO creation, then this is a PO change and you can print the PO changes as an extra message and send to your vendor.
checking if inspection notification is created has to be made via user exit.

When asking siri for directions home it gives us someone elses contact info. how do i change this?

when asking siri for directions home it gives us someone elses contact info. How can i change this?

settings - general - siri - my info -

Rounding value for direct procurement

Hi,
I an sourcing the same material from another plant within the same client. The materiale is some times purchased as a standard material using rounding value and going to stock. But, in some cases the material is procured as direct procurement. When purchasing for direct procurement will it then be possible not to use the rounding value but just order the exact quantity?
thanks,
Anders

Hi Andres,
I think, you do not need to take any action on this requirement. SAP works the way you wanted, by standard. For example, you have a setup with a vendor (may be via info record or material master itself may have rounding qty etc)...not a problem. The parameters you use in material master will control for procurement process either triggered from planning (or production ) or manual purchases. When you create a SO# and if it triggers a purchase requisition, it sends exact quantity required only, into the preqs. By standard SAP config, the message about rounding rules is just warning. I don't think you will be stuck with this message when you try to convert the 3rd party Preq to PO. Even if there is a message, it must just warning.
Let me know with these inputs, if you test both types of PO#s, how it goes.
Regards

Liability on two transport vendors for one shipment

I am in the process of configuring transportation with two level leg determination. That is from parent plant to one destination, it would be in main leg and from that destination to final destination in subsequent leg.
The purpose of doing is that liability should be created on two transport vendors while creating shipment document. I have done almost all configuration settings related to this in IMG > Logistics Execution > Transportation and Routes. But I am unable to create second shipment document via VT01N. First of all, my doubt is, is it possible to create a shipment document without considering the parent delivery document since it has already been assigned to first shipment.
Have searched the forum but I am unable to find a solution. Need experts help.
Kaushal

hi kushal,
this is to inform you that,
ok you are doing transportation chain concept and in that you are using two TCP one is main leg for one destination and second destination for subsequent leg.
here i have a doubt, you are processing one single delivery with two different vendors, please correct me if am wrong.
if you are using one single delivery for two shipments creation it is not possible, because the delivery is already assigned to frist shipment. so please create a shipment document with collective shipment but dont take individual shipment and try.
regards,
balajia

In- transit for PP.

How do I find the quantity in-transit for the PP?
This is to be added in a report.
Can any one help me?

Hi Murali,
I am bit confused whether you need in-transit or Stock in transit?
Any how go through the links for the both,
<b>in-transit</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/6d/27dc37a3f57a07e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
<b>stock in transit</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/51/ca26f078663f4386b892ed3f11fb4a/frameset.htm
Regards,
Azaz Ali.

BAPI for stock in transit for each plant

Hi,
i am looking a for a bapi which will return stock in transit for that plant.
Regards,
Mukund

Hi,
Try FM
CHECK_S078
CHECK_S084
Hope it helps..
Lokesh
Pls. reward appropriate points
Message was edited by: Lokesh Aggarwal

Received for my shipment, but there is the size of memory error

Apple estimable
Greetings
Received for my shipment, but there is the size of memory error
I got up at the request of any device iPhone 5 golden color 64 and receive your iPhone 5 golden color 32
I do not want to go back I want to machine used it, but there is a difference in price between the two devices you will recover this amount that he is a natural occurrence of human errors because who does not mistaken does not produce <
Thank you Please accept the assurances of respect and appreciation.

There is no one from Apple here. You need to call Apple Sales, as no one here can help you.

PO Error in Transfer for Direct Procurment

Hi All,
we are running SRM 550 and are at SP15.
We need to get SRM to order Direct Materials for a storage location in our ECC system.
So far all the config has been done, materials transferred, storage locations defined in Org structure extended attributes.
Problem is when I create a PO from a SC for direct materials I get an Error in Transfer and the error in RZ20 says that the account assignment is not valid for the ECC PO doc type.
This all used to work in 2008 when we went live wih SRM but direct procurment was switched off because the business did not need it.
In PPB_PD for the PO there is no account assignment data so I think this is where I have a problem.
I must be missing some small piece of config somewhere that provides the account assignment GL for direct procurment but I can't find it.
Any suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks in advance
Allen

Hi Allen,
Please create wildcard entries for AccAssCat in IMG table
V_BBP_DET_ACCT, details see encl. file V_BBP_DET_ACCT.DOC
The issue is that even for subtype DP Direct Procurement Account
Assignment Category must exist, otherwise PO cannot be transferred
Accounting is going to be eliminiated one step later after ordering,
in background task, not visible to the user. Please realize!
I have uploaded V_BBP_DET_ACCT.DOC to SAPMATS, click on the following link.
Link: [https://sapmats-de.sap-ag.de/download/download.cgi?id=LL0BCK4LD9DE7XZOG9M7WGGNG11AWE43UCBMUW1T05TKD1IOK2]
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Backend Source of Supply not supported for Direct Material in SRM

Hi ,
When creating S/C or PO in SRM for Direct Material , backend Source of Supply ( i..e Purchasing Info Record or Backend Contracts ) not availble to select as a sourc of supply .
In our case, we are planning to maintain the sourc of supply (PIR or Contracts) in back end MM system only , then how can pick up the same ?
Can anyone please suggest on this .
Regards
NAP

NO Prashanta,
It is still pending for me . i just raised OSS message to SAP ...but SAP saying that
" I checked and found that in the classic scenario , Direct Materials cannot use backend contracts. The behavior described above is in accordance with the system design. Only local sources of supply (local contracts and interlinkages) can be
used in the direct material scenario, as well as as in the extended classic scenario . Therefore the above error message which you get "Specify a valid contract" is valid."
I replied with the doubt that "Thanks for reply but we are not convenience, since what we learnt from
different SAP Blogs, Below SAP help and SRM Experts discussion forum
is, for Ext Classic Scenario (since for direct materials it always
tales by default Ext Classic Scenario, although we implemented Classic)
Local SRM contract and Supplier List are the possible Source of Supply.
As per SAP help documentation for Self-Service Procurement (Extended
Classic) on below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/e0/f6be5157a24340bf7b1279854a52e1/frameset.htm u201CYou can assign the sources proposed by the
system to items automatically (for example, if there is a single
contract for the item being procured) or manually in the case of a
quota arrangement, contract, or supplier from a supplier listu201D
As per SAP help documentation for Sourcing Using Supplier Lists on
below link,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/d8/33ec56f17f4404806072749f7e764f/frameset.htm u201CIn supplier lists, you can also manually allocate
back-end contracts from specific systems. This enables more effective
sourcing for back-end contractsu201D
In the Supplier List there is facility to enter the ECC Contract
Number. Supplier List donu2019t support local SRM contract. It supports
only ECC Contract /item.
As per your reply, do you mean to say that Source List is not a valid
Source of Supply for Direct Material in Classic Scenario (i.e. Ext
Classic scenario)? If not, then why the backend ECC Contract displays
as a Source of Supply, when we check the u201COrder as direct Materialu201D?
Kindly suggest"
Lets see.what SAP now replies.
Simultaniously I'm looking some enhancment
If you have nay update/soultion then please share with me.

Ownership, In-Transit for Direct Shipments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for