Inconsistency in hierarchy?

Hi,
I have a suspicion in my 0CUST_SALES hierarchy problem.
0CUST_SALES has a composed key:
0Division / 0distr_chan / 0salesorg / 0cust_sales
There are several hierarchies all beginning with 0division XX/
In my InfoCube all entries have the 0division MB. I think that could be the reason for the unability to assign a hierarchy to the entries.
But in the R/3 reports there are hierarchies for every entry. The Report determines the hierarchy like this:
select .. from knvh
where kunnr..
vkorg..
date..
Does somebody have a hint for me? Should I loosen the attributes 0division and 0distr_chan out of 0cust_sales?
Message was edited by: Tobias Kiemes

Hallo Tobias
Have a look at table /bi0/HCUST_SALES for the field IOBJNM NODENAME
0CUST_SALES DIV(2)DISTR_CHAN(2)SALESORG(4)CUST_SALES(10)
The nodename must be for example 201000100000034545 where
20 = divison
10 = Distr_chan
0010 = Salesorg
0000034545 = Customer sales
Do you load correctly form R/3? Check if data are consistency.
Mike

Similar Messages

Load Failure due to Hierarchy

Hi Experts
I am facing a problem in a load that fails because of the following reason
Record 13: Node ID 00054658 starts an endless loop.
Record 4039: Node ID 00054647 does not exist
End Update of Master Data hierarchy.
please suggest why is the load failing what exactly can be done to rectify the error or incase i am missing out something please let me know so that i can provide that info too.
Thanks
Puneet

[Hello ,|http://chandranonline.blogspot.com]
Have a look at these OSS Notes
SAP Note 569137 Inconsistent BW hierarchy 3.0B/3.10 (Support Package 8/2)
SAP Note 859293 Runtime: Upgrade to 640 - error when reading node hierarchy
[Thanks|http://chandranonline.blogspot.com]
[Chandran|http://chandranonline.blogspot.com]

What is wrong with as3

this is not a question about 'how i do X'. is rather a 'discussion' (flame or whatever, but to defend or argue about aspects, not people) about 'what is wrong with as3' and what aspects whould be taken into consideration for updates. right now i am using as3, and since i paid for this license, i choose this tool over some alternatives and i am using it to do stuff for other people who pay me to do it, i think it can be helpful for all of us if some actions are started in the right direction. i have already posted about 'all people in adobe are dumbasses that do not know how to make a scripting tool and are messing up my work', but i was pissed at the time (i still am pissed) but i believe this is not the right aproach. instead, if this goes to the right people in adobe, we all may get something in the future, like better and easier todo apps and web presentations.
pre: not only about the as3 specification, but COMPLY with the specification that you set. for example, some time ago there were problems with matrix transforms. this was corrected later with a patch. but this means it is not even doing what is is supposed to do
1. scriptable masks and movement, sprites and child sprites: there is a sprite with a mask, the mask is a shape drawn via script, something like
somemask=new shape();
somemask.graphics.beginfill();
(...etc)
somesprite.mask=somemask;
just like that. now add some child sprites to 'somesprite', and make 'somesprite' move, scale and rotate. there you will have something like a kaleidoscope, but not what you expected to do with your script. as the child sprites move in the parent mask, you will see that the child sprites appear or dissapear kind of randomly, and if the child sprites are textfields, it may be that the text is rendered outside the mask, or partially rendered outside the mask (as in only part of the text), rendered with the wrongf rotation or in the wrong place. some child sprites are clipped correctly, some dissapear totally when only a part should dissapear (clipped) etc.
way around: have not tried it yet, but i have the impression that bitmaps have different criteria for clipping, so i am thinking of trying this: appli an empty filter (a filter with params so it does not have any effect on the sprite or in the textfield) so the sprite is rendered as bitmap before doing anything else with it. as i said, i have not done it yet, but it may be a way around this problem, to avoid all this inconsistency with clipping
1-b. inconsistency between hierarchy and coordinates, specially masks: you apply a mask to a sprite, yet the sprite has a set of coordinates (so 'x' in the sprite means an x relative to its container), yet the mask applied to the very same sprite, as another reference as reference for coordinates (like the stage)
2. painting via script: in any other languaje, in any other situation, something like:
beginFill(params);
(...stuff 1)
endFill();
beginFill(params);
(...stuff 2)
endFill();
(...etc)
means: render region of block 1, then render region of block 2 etc, and no matter what, it should be consistent, since there is noplace for ambiguity. if you read it, you may think what that means, even if you dont run it you may have an idea of the picture you want to draw, but not with as3. as3 somehow manages to screw something that simple, and mixes all the blocks, and somehow uses the boundaries of one block as boundaries for other block. is like all blocks are dumped into whatever, and then uses all lines defined into it as boundaries for a unique block. it changes all boundaries and generates inconsistency between what is shown and redraw regions of the resulting picture, like lines that go to the end of the screen and then dont go away in the next frames, even tough the beginfill endfill block should prevent it
3. event flow: i dont know what was the policy behind as3 event flow design. it is in no way similar or an extension to previous event flow, neither with any event flow in any other plattform. i dont know how most people start with as3; in my case, i unpacked, installed and when i tried to do something with what i already knew i could not, so i started reading the as3 docs, and since is like 800 pages long, i just read the basics and the rest i would 'wing it'. in the part of the event flow, there was something about bubbling and stuff, it was not clear at all and when i tried to do what is was said in the documentation (like preventing events to 'bubble', as is called in the documentation), i could not see any effect but i could see it was a mess. flash is not the only thing out there to work with pictures or to work with mouse events, but is the only one that deals with things like 'target' and 'currentTarget'. my first experience on needing this was when i was dealing with my own event handlers (so the only thing that had control over mouse was the stage, and i would admin everything via script). there were events generated everywhere, the stage got events that were not genrated directly over the stage, but got there not with stage coordinates but the coordinates relative to the sprite that generated the event. so if i hover the mopuse over the stage, and the stage has some things on it how does it work? i get multiple event calls, like it was hovering multiple times over the stage in a single frame, but in each call with different coordinates? and what if i set all child sprites as mouseenabled=false or compare like 'if (event.target != event.currenttarget)', what if i move the mouse over a child, does it prevent the move mouse event at all? or does it filter only the event call with only stage coordinates? in my case, every time i move over another clip (with mouseenabled = true), the stage gets it as 'mouse up', even tough there was never a mouse release, what the hell? do even the people at adobe know how to handle events with their own tool when they require it? why does an event 'bubble' when i have not specifically tell it to do it? mi thought is that this event flow was very poorly conceived, and tough the intention may have been that there were different cases and it shopuld cover all cases, they actually introduced new problems that were not present in traditional ways to handle it, and it is neither the easier way to handle things, and this way, a very simple problem turns into a very ugly thing because it must handle things that were not neccesary to handle, or were implicit in other situations.
4. legacy: since as3, all interaction is different, and if you want to do things in the new plattform, using the new features, what you already knew just goes to the garbage can. when a new tool arrives, it should be an extension to previous tools (which is a reason to update instead of just buying a new tool from a different vendor). if everything i had or knew just means nothing from now on, then i can not say 'i know flash script', and my previous knowledge gives me no advantage when aproaching the new version. as3 is a new aproach that requires doc reading and stuff, even if you knew something about previous as specifications or other oo languajes. if you decide to change things from now on, like the things mentioned in this post, instead of just throwing away everything the users alerady knew about the tool, do like in java releases, they mark some things as 'deprecated', they keep working as they should, give a warning, but also a message saying this feature is deprecated, we suggest you use this library instead.
5. lack of previous functionality: if you 'update' something, it meand all previos functionality is still there (probably improved, but not with bugs if it was working fine), plus something else. now it seems backwards, there are some things that could be done in previous versions but not in this one, like 'duplicatemovieclip'
6. inconsistency with scripting/programming paradigms: (ok, fancy work, but fits perfectly here): as3 proposed ways to handle things, but the people who designed it got 'too creative', and they did something that is not consistent neither with previous versions of as or with other languajes. the documentations is full of things like 'it looks like x languaje or languaje family, but instead of using XXX word, you must use YYY'. great, what is this? namespaces 'work like', but 'differently' for example from java, .net, .c. its got the idea that a namespace means a grouped functionality but there are rules about where should be placed the file (ok, java has this also, .net takes care of it automatically if all files are registered in the project), but what you got is a mess that 'if you know other languajes you got the general idea, but nonetheless, even if you knew this or previosu versions of as, you still have to read whatever we decided arbitrarily just to be different'. namespaces, event handling, vars definition which is not like previous scripting neither like fully typed languajes.. is just a mess.
7. lack of scripting and graphics integration: unlike flash and adobe tools that just got on the graphics side leaving all the scripting integratuion apart, most tools from other vendors integrate very well interacton with what is on the screen. the script editor: very poor. autocompletion? a drop down list that does not heklp at all, appears in the wrong places, and when you need it to go, it does not go (so if i want to move away from the uncalled drop down list, i have to click somewhere else, making developement slowewr instead of helping, so the drop down list does not capture all events when i dont want to). in other ides you double click somewhere and it will go to the part of code relevant to that event or whatever. for example microsoft tools, ok i am antimicrosoft, and one of the reasons was that when windows 95 got to market proposing itself as the ONLY pc os you could use if you wanted to keep useing the apps you already had, it was a lousy product full of flaws but you had to keep using it because you had no choice. what is so different from what is happening with flash just now? yet the ide of c# is awesome, works very well and seems reliable.
adobe people: not all user are designers that just make pretty pictures. if it is not intended for scripting then why is it there. and if there are corrections to be done, they should patch all versions, not only the last one. previous version users also paid for their versions.

Well, there is no point in arguing.
I personally believe AS3 does exactly what it promises to do within limits (read: reasonable limits) of ECMA type of language. And sometimes it doesn’t do what we expect it to for it cannot possibly emulate everyone’s thinking process. The task, I guess, is to learn to think in terms of AS3 – not to try to make AS3 think like us. No language covers all the grounds. And no, it is not Java - with no negative or positive connotation. It is what it is. Period. I just hope that AS5 will be more Java like.
You are right about the fact that it is not necessary to know all the aspects of language in order to perform the majority of tasks. But it is paramount to have a clear idea about such fundamental concepts as display list model and events. For instance, depth swap has no meaning in terms of AS3 because display list object stacking is controlled automatically and there is no need for all these jumping through hoops one has to perform in order to control depth in AS2. There no more gaps in depths and one always know where to find things.
Similarly, there is no point in having duplicateMovieClip method. More conventional OOP ways of object instantiation accomplishes just that and much more. Just because OOP object instantiation needs to be learned doesn’t mean past hacks have place in modern times. duplicateMovieClip is a horse carriage standing next to SUV. What one should choose to travel?
Events are implemented to the tee in the context of ECMA specifications. I consider Events model as very solid, it works great (exactly as expected) and never failed me. True, it takes time to get used to it. But what doesn’t?
By the way, speaking about events, contrary to believe in Adobe’s inconsideration to their following. Events are implemented with weakly reference set to false although it would be better to have it set to true. I think this is because there are smart and considerate people out there who knew how difficult it would be for programming novices to deal with lost listeners.
I think AS3 is million times better than AS2. And one of the reasons it came out this way is that Adobe made a very brave and wise decision to break totally loose from AS2’s inherent crap. They have created a totally new and very solid language. If they had tried to make it backward compatible – it would be a huge screw up, similar to how our friends at Microsoft are prostituting VB and VBA – extremely irritating approach IMHO.
Also, Flash legacy issues shouldn’t be overlooked. Flash did not start as a platform for programmers. Entire timeline concept in many ways is not compatible with the best OOP practices and advancements. I think for anyone who is used to writing classes the very fact of coding on timeline sounds awkward. It feels like a hack (and AS2 IS a pile of hacks) – the same things can be nicely packaged into classes and scale indefinitely. As such I wouldn’t expect Adobe to waste time on hacking timeline concept issues by making smarter editor. They have made a new one – FlexBuilder – instead. Serious programmers realize very soon that Flash IDE is not for developing industrial strength applications anyway. So, why bother with channeling great minds into polishing path to the dead end?
I would like to state that all this is coming form a person who knew Flash when there was no AS at all. And I applaud every new generation of this wonderful tool.
I believe Adobe does a great job making transition from timeline paradigm to total OOP venue as smooth as possible. And no, they don’t leave their devoted followers behind contrary to many claims. They are working on making developing Flash applications as easy as possible for people of all walks. Welcome Catalyst!
Of course there is not enough information about AS3 capabilities and features. But, on the other hand, I don’t know any area of human kind activities that does.

Create Internal Order Group massively

Hi Gurus,
I need to create massively internal order group.
Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance.
Angela

Has anyone found the answer to this query yet?
I tried using an LSMW:
Business Object: BUS1117
Method: CREATE
Message Type: INTERNALORDERGROUP_CREATE
Basic Type: INTERNALORDERGROUP_CREATE01
However, it is only creating the top node via idoc
The other idocs fail with "Inconsistent set hierarchy"
My issue is I am not sure how to setup the source structures and source file (file upload).
This is how I setup the file:
TOPNODEONLY GROUPNAME     HIERLEVEL     VALCOUNT     DESCRIPT                              VALFROM                      VALTO
            92CAPITAL     0                   0         92 RPC Domestic Capital
            92NONDAIRY      1     0     92 Non Dairy Capital
            92ARLIN             2     0     92 Arlington plant capital
            92AR_CRFRD      3     0     92 Previous Year - Arlington
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Data slice inconsistency problem with hierarchy nodes

Hi Experts,
We want to lock planning tables from function. We create the appropriate data slices but there are problems with (material group) hierarchy nodes.
If I give the node as input variable to the function it causes inconsistency in the data slice. If I choose and add this node to the lock in modeler, the problem is the same.
We are using the following variables to create a data slice:
0VERSION
0VTYTYPE
0COMP_CODE
ZGRMAT (developed material group)
Z_YEARCR (developed yera created)
The problem also exist if I set an another type of node e.g. destination country (0RECIPCNTRY) instead of material group.
For me, the problem seems to be generic.
Do you have any idea?
Many thanks in advance
Peter

There is a note related to this proble:
Note 1070608 - Lowflag field is not valid
The implementation of this note resolves the problem.
Peter

Hierarchy Inconsistent in DEV/Q and Prod

Hi All,
I created a GL Account hierarchy in DEV, QA and Production separately. I added all the GLs similarly in all the 3 systems, the issue is for some reason one GL Account from the hierarchy is not getting picked in the report output only in Production. On the other hand, the same GL is showing up in the report in Dev and QA. Again when I create a power user report, the amount against that GL show up. I tried all the possible ways to fix this, i tried recreating the hierarchy in prod already twice and every time amounts for only one specific GL don't get displayed in the report output. Can anyone suggest a way to fix this?
Thanks for your help!

is your hierarchy generic or sap standard, make sure our hierarchy is activated in rsa6 PRd qas and dev system, replicate the data source in BW system and do a test run and load in to PSA see if its shows in PSA and also check the value in Hierarchy tcode( dont recall it on top of my head). if it all works then something in the query is cauing the issue could be some filter.

Error while trying to choose query parameter Inconsistent input paramete

I got error on PRD while trying to choose parameter before executing BEX query:
101 Inconsistent input parameter (parameter: <unknown>, value <unknown>)
100 Program error in class SAPMSYY1 method: UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION
Notes:
the same functionality works fine in DEV environment.
the other parameters on query in PRD work fine
the parameter with error based on custom hierarchy
P.S. I heart BEx :]

Hello,
This problem has been solved before with notes 1236774, 1151320 & 1264213.
Please check.
Thanks,
Michael

Error while loading the Hierarchy from R/3 to BI.

Dear all ,
I am trying to load a hierarchy FROM R/3 to BI . When I am executing the Info package its showing an below Error.
Hierarchy object is u201CWBS elementu201D
The level of the node ID 01494179 does not suit the lev. of the higher lev. node
The level of the node ID 01494178 does not suit the lev. of the higher lev. node
The level of the node ID 01493822 does not suit the lev. of the higher lev. node
Could you please let me know what would be the reasonu2026u2026?
Regards,
Raghu

Hi
looks like there is some inconsistency in hierchy data you are tring to laod.
Check hierarchy in r3 if its ok, if yes try deleting complete hierarchy and reloading it.
You may also chose to adjust it manually
Regards
Sudeep

Different product hierarchy in sales order and in service order

Dear experts,
In VA03, I notice that
- under Line Item > Sales B, there is a field Product Hierarchy
- under Line Item > Account assignment, there is a field Order. From here, it links to a service order. In the service order, I can see a field Product Hierarchy too.
I would like to know if there is an implication when the field Product Hierarchy in sales order and in service order are different. Is it possible that this will cause an inconsistency?
Usually these two fields have the same value, since the value in sales order is copied from service order. However, in my case, the product hierarchy is changed/updated in service order, but not in sales order.

Hi,
We have document pricing procedure maintained at two levels for Sales order or Billing type.
The pricing procedure is determined based on SAles Area Customer pricing procedureDocument Pricing procedure+pricing procedure.
Example :For Sales Document type the document pricing rpocedure will be A and for billing type 'B"
Sales Area1A+Pricing procedure A
Sales Area1B+Pricing procedure B
Now A will be maintained in VOV8 and B will be maintained in VOFA.So two pricing procedures.
Regards,

Error in WBS Element Hierarchy load after ECC 6.0 Upgrade

Hi All,
After ECC 6.0 Upgrade in R/3, we are doing test load in a Test server. While doing, we have encountered an issue with 0WBS_ELEMENT Hierarchy load. The message in the monitor is like below.
"Node ID 00014240 has not been included in the hierarchy
Message no. RH207"
When I run the same hierarchy in another system which is not upgraded , it works fine.
Anybody has faced similar kind of issues and can throw some light on this issue?
Thanks,
Mohan

Try activating the Heirarchy in R/3 and re-trigger the load, error is very specific to structure of the hierarchy. there is a possibility that this Hierarcy could have got inconsistent after the upgrade.
Thanks,
Amit

Task Flow Transaction Handling Inconsistent between JDeveloper R1 & R2.

We have a solution developed using Jdeveloper 11.1.2.1.0.
To describe the use case I will use the HR schema.
The user must be able to view Regions and navigate to Countries and Locations in a hierarchical way. At each level he must be allowed to view and maintain the detail of the current record at that level. The user must also be able to navigate directly to a level and perform a search to view the data and from there be allowed to to view and maintain the detail of the current record at that level.
So I have created the following design to achieve this and take into consideration that I need to reuse my task flows that maintain the data.
Business Services (Model Project)
1. HierarchyAM, containing Read Only VO’s of the various levels nested by association/view link.
2. Region + Countries + Locations
3. Search#Level#AM, A separate AM for each level, containing the Read Only VO per level.
4. Maintain#Level#AM, A Separate AM for each level, containing an updateable VO per level.
UI (View Controller Project)
I created the following BTF’s (To try and keep the post short as possible I will only provide detail for a single level to explain the issues)
*1. HiererchyBTF*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Added RegionHierarchyBtf, CountryHierarchyBTF, LocationHierarchyBTF to the above fragment as dynamic regions.
c.     Task flow transaction <No Controller Transaction>, isolated.
*2. RegionHierarchyBTF. (The same BTF’s are created for each level in the hierarchy)*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Exposed HierarchyAM<RegionRoVO>
c.     Task flow transaction <No Controller Transaction>, shared.
d.     Includes a call to the EditRegionBTF.
*3. SearchRegionBTF (The same BTF’s are created for each level in the hierarchy)*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Exposed SearchRegionAM<RegionRoVO>
c.     Task flow transaction <No Controller Transaction>, isolated.
d.     Includes a call to the EditRegionBTF.
*4. EditRegionBTF*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Exposed MaintainRegionAM<RegionVO>
c.     Task flow transaction <Use Existing Transaction if Possible>, isolated.
Runtime behaviour with above configuration.
1.     Running the HiererchyBTF and navigation the levels works in all versions.
2.     Calling an edit BTF allows me to edit the current record and successfully commit the data in all versions.
3.     Calling an edit BTF for the same record immediately thereafter, allows me to edit the record and commit the data successfully in all versions.
4.     Running any of search BTF’s and calling the edit BTF works in all versions.
Runtime behaviour and changing the EditRegionBTF task flow transaction to Shared.
1.     Running the HiererchyBTF and navigation the levels works in all versions.
2.     Calling an edit BTF allows me to edit the current record in the table and successfully commit the data in all versions.
3.     Calling an edit BTF for the same record immediately thereafter, allows me to edit the record and commit the data successfully in 11.1.1.4.0 & 11.1.1.6.0 only. If I perform the same scenario in 11.1.2.1.0 I receive the following exception.
a.     JBO-25003: Object MaintainLocationAM of type ApplicationModule is not found.
4.     Repeating the process, but after editing the first record, edit the second record in the table the error is not encountered. If, after successfully editing the second record and committing the data successfully, I again edit the first record I edited, I receive the same exception as in point 3.
5.     Running any of search BTF’s and calling the edit BTF works in all versions.
For the purpose of having a reusable edit task flow, I need to have the task flow transaction configuration as <Use Existing Transaction if Possible>, shared. This enables me to have the edit task flow as a parent as well as a child task flow and use the task flow functionality irrespective if it is controlling the transaction or not.
My questions are;
1. Is my design acceptable for the solution I am developing, I am more specifically questioning my separation of the AM’s to achieve loosely coupled task flows.
2. Is there a bug (I have done a search on MOS) that details this behaviour.
3. As, in my opinion, this is a common requirement, why is there inconsistency between the versions.
The demo for each version can be made available.
Regards.
Leon.
Edited by: Leon Dorfling on Feb 21, 2013 1:44 AM

Hi Frank,
+1. Its the first sting I stumbled on reading your post. Unless the read-only view object AMs are shared across users (application scope) I don't see why you want to have them in a separate AM. I don't see a benefit in a purely read-only view object that is not backed up by entities and thus would follow Oracle's recommendation to always use entities with view objects.+
The read-only vo's are based on eo's. I separated the AM as the search use cases are independent of one another. So my understanding, from a performance perspective, is to not have all the read-only vo's of the entire hierarchy of products in a single AM if I am only going to access one of them. If I do not understand correctly, can you please assist me in better understanding.
+2. For sure this behavior doesn't sound right and should be filed. You may want to check 11.2.3 in case it has been fixed in there already.+
As posted by Chris, I have through MOS found that it has been fixed in a later version.
Btw.: "Calling an edit BTF for the same record immediately thereafter, allows me to edit the record and commit the data successfully" how do you call this task flow dynamic region or task flow call activity ?
The BTF's are called using a backing bean.
Regards
Leon.

Hierarchy Problem

Hi,
We have a query with several free characteristics, one of which is SEGMENT and this has a hierarchy. I run the query, the report comes up. Then, I click on the filter button next to SEGMENT. The first 4 nodes of the hierarchy come up. I expand the first node, and this gives me the 6 leaves of node 1. In this, I select the first 3 leaves, and then I click on the Transfer button. The report runs again, no problems. Now I click on the same filter button again, and again, the first 4 nodes of the hierarchy come up. I expand the first node, and the first 3 leaves, which I had selected, are now showing with no ticks. Why has the ticks for the first three leaves diappeared?
Why is the selection diappearing? Any help is gteartly appreciated. We use BW 3.1
Sujoy

Well, the first question is what do you want the end result to be?
Do you want it to be the case that the sum of the "children" of net income is not equal to the value of net income (since 578004 is counted in multiple children, but only once in NET_INCOME)?
Is 578004 really intended to aggregate into both intermediate results?
One possibility if you want to keep things inconsistent is to add a third hierarchy which explicitly tells Aggregate how to calculate NET_INCOME. The way that Aggregate resolves inconsistent hierarchies is that it gives precedence to the definition of the later hierarchies.
So something like this:
Hierarchy 1:
578004 -> Intermediate A
Hierarchy 2:
578004 -> Intermediate B
Intermediate A -> NET_INCOME
Intermediate B -> NET_INCOME
Hierarchy 3
578004 -> NET_INCOME
Creates an inconsistent, hierarchy (NET_INCOME has different definitions in different hierarchies), but since Aggregate will use the Hierarchy 3 version there is no longer an undirected loop from 578004 back to itself (i.e. it would not longer be double counted).
If you want 578004 to aggregate into Intermediate A when you are looking at the view for hierarchy 1, but NOT to aggregate into Intermediate A when looking at the view for hierarchy 2 then what you are really suffering from here not the undirected loop, but the inconsistent definition of the Intermediate A.
Which leads to the second potential solution - to create distinct dimension values for "Intermediate A_H1" and "Intermediate A_H2".
Hierarchy 1:
578004 -> Intermediate A_H1
Hierarchy 2:
578004 -> Intermediate B_H2
Intermediate A_H2 -> NET_INCOME
Intermediate B_H2 -> NET_INCOME
Here it is completely clear that NET_INCOME is the sum of the intermediates in the second hierarchy, and the intermediate in the first hierarchy is something completely different.
In summary it all depends on what you want as output.

Hierarchy Data not saved after Hierarchy Load

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a problem with the hierarchy data load in SAP BPC NW 7.5 SP06. I have already used /CPMB/IMPORT_IOBJ_MASTER & /CPMB/IMPORT_IOBJ_HIER once to load the data from BI to BPC and it worked fine that time.
Now I have made some changes in the Hierarchy at the BI side. When I run the package link list, the /CPMB/IMPORT_IOBJ_MASTER chain runs fine and the master data, description for Attribute and Hierarchies are loaded perfectly. But whn the /CPMB/IMPORT_IOBJ_HIER is run, the changes are not saved in the BPC Member sheet. I have manually make the changes in the member sheet and Process the Dimension.
Can we process the Dimension explicitly after the Hierarchy load again?
Does anyone have an idea about this?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Abhishek

Abhishek,
Double check whether /CPMB/IMPORT_IOBJ_MASTER is bringing all the ID's,Texts and Hierarchy Nodes. If required drop the data from dimesion member sheet and load it again.
Double check the Hierarchy and level setup while running /CPMB/IMPORT_IOBJ_HIER.
(when we are in SP05, it was not bringing the multiple Hierarchies, now we are in SP07 loading multiple hierarchies but not the TEXT fo the Id's some inconsistency)
Thanks

How to create an Hierarchy from 2 tables in Essbase

Hi,
Currently We have 5 dimension tables and one fact table in Star Schema Model.We have requirement to create an hierarchy which pulls from multiple tables
For Eg:
Table:1 P1 P2
Table:2 Q1 Q2
Expected Hierarchy :
P1
Q1
While we try to implement it shows inconsistent results.Can some one let me know the alterante solution to fulfill this requirement.
Thanks,
SatyaB

Your JOIN doesn't work?
You'd have to post what the tables look like, what you're joining on, etc., etc. You aren't supplying enough information.
I am (to put it kindly) a SQL hack. I have found that if I go to a company's dba with my childlike SQL and ask, "Can you improve this?" almost 100% of the time they take pity on me and improve my code to no end. I know that's not what a dba is really for, but they tend to like well formed SQL touching their databases. Failing that, is there someone at your firm that is good with SQL who can help? You're on an Essbase board, not a SQL board, so you are likely not going to get the help you need here.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Inconsistent Query Result in SEM-BCS using Virtual Info Provider

We have just upgraded to BW 7.0 and SEM-BCS 6.0. When we run an existing 3.5 BW query for BCS through the Virtual Info Provider against the basic consolidation cube, we are getting inconsistent results. Sometimes we get the correct result, and other times our results are not rolling up correctly causing an out of balance on our balance sheet query. We did not make any hierarchy changes between the query executions. Has anyone else experienced this? We cannot see the cause of the inconsistency. Everything looks good when running through RSRT DEBUG. Any help on pushing us in the right direction to solve this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rob

Hi Rob,
Could you please let me know how you have resolved this issue? Thanks.
Regards,
Ashok

Inconsistency in hierarchy?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for