Inconsistent MM FI invoices

Hi,
Since we are using the background invoice posting (MRBP) some invoices (between 0,5% and 1% of the total volume) are inconsistent:
- the FI document (BKPF) are generated
- the MM document is not updated, thus its status (RBSTAT) is to 1 or 3.
This is a big problem as we cannot pay these invoices.
Did anyone experience this bug?
Note: we are using ECC6. This did not happen on previous release.
Edited by: ORFILA Pascal on Jul 1, 2009 1:12 AM

Hi,
Please refer SAP
Note 322397 - Consistency check and corr. of incorrectly posted invoices
Note 382797 - MIRO: Analysis and repair for missing follow-up documents
Note these are critical notes and contact SAP before you are executing these programs.
I would also recommend you to go through the related notes mentioned in these notes.
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

MM INVOICE blocking status

HI All,
I'm looking at blocking in MM Invoice(4.7) and see a payment block set to Invoice Verification(R) on screen, but when I look in the background at the table RBKP, the field ZLSPR(blocking indicator) is not set in this instance. How is the on screen value derived?

Hi Charlie,
apologies for the delay in responding to your answers.
The specific issue is that I need to ascertain whether a further interrogation of BSEG is required when the status on the RBKP record is blank. Is there anyway of determining whether the Invoice is blocked other than having to look further down the document flow.
I did look at the RBKP_BLOCKED table but found an inconsistency, where an invoice showed as blocked when viewed thru MIR4, but was not on RBKP_BLOCKED(the document had actually been cleared with a block in place).
Thanks in advance for any response.

Problem : Missing Invoice Details

To all,
We have experience a problem in SAP B1 2005 A were in the details of an AR Invoice is missing but AR Invoice is already posted and hold a status of open. A journal entry is also created showing the usual entry of Cost of Sales, Inventory and A/R. Furthermore you could not see the invoice in incoming payment. We also look into INV1 Table and it doesn't show the details that corresponds to the invoice. Running Inventory audit trail shows that details of invoices was issued or items are deducted from inventory. You can't even copy it to AR Credit Memo.
We hope someone could give us procedure on how to solve this problem..
Jhun

Hi,
It seems that there is an issue with the database. Due to some reason, the database has got inconsistency regadring the invoice.
You need to open a Support ticket on SAP partner portal and make sure you update the message with all the details relevant regarding the issue in order to have the investigation done.
Kind Regards,
Jitin Chawla
SAP Business One Forum Team

Approval for frame work PO

Hello Friends,
we want clarify that why we need approval for Frame work PO .?
Scenario is :- while creating the PO we already take approval from the Managers or any responsible person.But while booking the IR in Miro we have to take approval for each invoice booking in this lot of time is getting waste so can any help us in this please.
thanks

Hi Ranjeet singh ;
If you take approval for PO , you should not need any approvel in invoice verification (miro) .
I quess that you take approval in miro so inconsistency option in invoice.
You can control po and miro consistensies with m8 system messages and tolerances.
Please look at document --> M8 messages for incoming invoices with tolerances
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal

Problem changing owner details

I've just started using a BlackBerry Pearl which still has the previous owner's details entered (name and phone number) which show up when the keyguard is activated. I have tried to change the details in Options/Owner but it won't let me. Any ideas?
The other problem is when I'm writing an e-mail or e-mail address it keeps coming up with some kind of predictive text/auto write which I find really annoying. I can't find any way to switch this off...can anyone help?
Many thanks.

Hi,
It seems that there is an issue with the database. Due to some reason, the database has got inconsistency regadring the invoice.
You need to open a Support ticket on SAP partner portal and make sure you update the message with all the details relevant regarding the issue in order to have the investigation done.
Kind Regards,
Jitin Chawla
SAP Business One Forum Team

The excise invoice is generatiing with inconsistant effect.

Dear All,
in my client i m having the excise invoice generation with the billing document at single step.
but some there is ome in consistancy in this. some times when we do it in single process the excise invoice is not getting generated.
it means if we are processing 1000 docuemnts its not processing for 300 documents.and when we are going to do it mannualy then also it not showing in due list of excise invoice creation in J1IIN.
please suggest what may be the probable reason for this.
Thanks with Regards
Subrat.

Hi,
To determine the automatic excise invoice have to maintain the default excise groups and series group, even thou every combination is there ,for your non generated invoices. Please sit with abaper and debug in j1iin by giving the billing document number in create mode.
regards

Inconsistent updation of sales group in Sales order and invoice

Dear all,
The sales office and sales group is properly updated in the specific sales area master data of the customer but not flowing in the sales order and subsquently in the invoice. For some documents it gets updated and for others the filed is blank.
I have checked the master data and also the documents and found no errors. Please help in how to solve the issue. I need 100% updation of sales office and sales group in the order and invoice. Please advice how to solve the issue.
Regards,
Parthasarathy.R

Dear Parthasarathy,
Request You to post the same query in SD Forum
You will get quick response there
this is PP forum
Hope You Understand
Regards
kumar

Invoice line items - inconsistant data returned from RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW

Hi there,
We are using a modified version of SAP standard Print Program RVADIN01 for our invoices, for many years now.
Everything works fine 99.9% of the time. Every now and again though, there is issue with the invoice, the root of which is data brought back from RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW .
From debugging the latest issue, I can see that the standard FM RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW, which is bringing back data for line items, is not filling all the data in certain cases.
For example, yesterday we had an invoice with 10 line items - this FM brought back full data for 9 line items, but the first was missing data in fields such as LAND_WE, SPRAS_WE etc. This then lead to a problem with text being read from T604T for that line.
I've checked that data being sent to RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW, and it looks correct.
I've checked and been assured that Master data is maintained correctly etc.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this or experience of something similar?
Thanks,
David

Hi Vijaymadhur,
Thanks for your response - I checked again in VF03, and the Ship-to is maintained for this line.
Infact, the second invoice line is almost identical to the first (except for quantity) and the FM brings back the correct ship-to etc. for that line.
Thanks,
David

Invoice document payment term inconsistency

I use MIR4 to display invoice, the payment terms is 122 days net, my base line date is 10.23
but i go to accounting document, it shows payment terms is five days due after baseline date
why payment terms are different, how 122 days calulated?

Hi,
According to Robert's advise, go to XK02 and go to Company code data and remove payment term code there.
And also make sure that payment term code is maintained in the Purchasing organisation level.
then only system will take the payment term from PO.
And one more thing is that...
For each payment term key, you can set a default date for determinating baseline date. You can set either Doc date or posting date or Entry date or NO DEFAULT.
And also check that your payment should have the number of required days maintained in it.
There is nothing to do with the description of payment term...Please check the Pt config in OBB8
Thanks,
Srinu

ME2N - Open Invoice report inconsistent

Hi Experts,
I have a strange case here -
We have a service PO (Qty - 24 Hrs / Amt - 100 $) for which SES was posted for full Qty/Amt. Invoice was posted for full Qty but less amount (say 98 $).
This PO appears in the ME2N report for selection parameter RECHNUNG (Open invoice) with 'Still to be invoiced' amount as '0 $'. Please help.
Regards,
Akash

Hi Dev,
ME2N:
ME2S:
Any suggestions please?
Regards,
Akash

OPEN_INTERFACE_REJECTS- INCONSISTENT SUPPL SITE

Payables Open Interface Import program is throwing INCONSISTENT SUPPL SITE, when a third party vendor site code and third party vendor site id is passed along with matching PO number for creating an invoice for third party vendor site.
Can any one let me know, how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
this could be due to passing values which are not correct for the vendor_site_id field ....do compare this transaction with other transactions that are imported successfully past, so that we can narrow down on the data which is different ...
Reference:
Expense Report Export Rejects Expense Reports With 'Supplier Site Id And Supplier Site Code Do Not Match' [ID 1408830.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha

Print Layout Designer - inconsistent output

Hi,
We have received consistent compaint from our client that the output of Print Layout Designer are inconsistent.
Eg: The same PLD template is used for An invoice print out from 2 different workstation. However, workstation A display the format properly, workstation B will have missing lines between boxes or the alignment is not displayed properly.
We have also recently encountered the problem that our client export the invoice to Acrobat and then print it. However, it displays properly for workstation with Acrobat version 8, 9, but missing lines for version 7.
Another scenario could be the form is displayed properly on the screen, but the physical print out to a printer is not consistent.
We really appreciate some share of thoughts here. Is switching to other report writer, eg: Crystal Report, the only option?
Edited by: Shwu Hua Gan on Aug 10, 2008 2:57 AM

Gordon,
Thanks for replying.
This is what happen to our client.
The font size of the customised PLD SAP Invoice is size 5. In order to preview the layout, they have to preview in PDF, once they are happy with the details and then print.
In some workstations, there are Adobe Reader version 8 or 9. In a couple of workstations, there are Adobe Acrobat version 9.
Let's say, there are 2 fields with the following properties:
Field A, Left = 0, Width = 10.
Field B, Left = 10, Width = 10.
Adobe Acrobat version 9 display the border of the field properly. However, those with Adobe Reader 8 / 9 will see gaps between fields.
If we change them as follows the field the gap;
Field A, Left = 0, Width = 10.
Field B, Left = 9, Width = 11,
Then those with Adobe Acrobat version 9 is missing the border for because Field A overlaps with Field B. But Adobe Reader 8/9 will print fine. It also works fine if user click 'Print Preview' as normal and then click 'Print'
Does anyone knows whether this inconsistencies is caused by
- printer drivers; or
- Adobe; or
- SAP Business One.

Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

Dear All,
I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
Where I am doing wrong?
please guide.
Using:
SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
Location : India.
Thanks.

Hi ,
maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
1846344 - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
Symptom
This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
Solution
Patch installation options:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
Patch content:
SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
Patch download:
Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
Header Data
Released On
02.05.2013 02:34:18
Release Status
Released for Customer
Component
SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade
Priority
Recommendations/additional info
Category
Upgrade information
References
This document refers to:
SAP Business One Notes
1482452
IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
1650289
Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
1678528
Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
1754529
Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
1756263
Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
1757641
Year-end closing
1757690
SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
1757898
Incoming Bank File Format
1757904
Outgoing Bank File Format
1762860
Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
1770690
Pro Forma Invoice
1776948
Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
1780460
OINM column description is not translated
1780486
UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
1788256
Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
1788372
ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
1788818
RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
1790404
Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
1791295
B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
1791416
Adding a new item to BoM is slow
1794111
Text is overlapping in specific localization
1795595
Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
1797292
Queries in alerts should support more query results
1800055
B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
1802580
Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
1803586
Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
1803751
Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
1804340
LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
1805554
G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
1806576
Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
1807611
Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
1807654
Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
1808694
BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
1809398
CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
1809758
Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
1810099
Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
1811270
Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
1811846
Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
1812344
Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
1812740
DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
1813029
US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
1813835
Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
1814207
Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
1814860
Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
1815535
RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
1815810
GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
1816191
BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
1816611
CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

Items of invoice include services from previous invoice of a current case..

Hi colleagues,
I have one problem, I've never faced with that one before. I have a case and one invoice for the case, for example later I want to add 2 new services and create a new one invoice for these two services - in this case a system creates invoice with these two new services and with all services from previous invoice for the same case with cost 0.
Could you please tell me what might be a reason for this? Has anybody faced with this one?
Thank you very much for your time.
Kind regards,
Alexander.

Hi Alexander
Sorry for my late response, I've been quite busy lately.
Wel, happened to me once in a customer, and I never found the cause of the error. Anyway, I could solve it.
In my case, if you see the field VBRP-ISHBELNRF and VBRP-ISHPOSNRF of the already billed service, points to a NLKZ record that does not exists in NKSP. (or something like that, I dont't remember very well, but truly, there is an inconsistency between what is stored in VBRP-ISHBELNRF and VBRP-ISHPOSNRF and what you see in the insurance verifcation tables)
It seams that, if you use the Standard IV and then the Extended IV, somehow the NLKZ records are grooped into one position of NKSP.
The solution I've found is to filter those already fully billed services before they are processed.
To do so you must enhance the form CHECK_SELECT_SERVICES_xx of the include LN090FXX (XX is the country version, depending on the country version your are using another form could be called)
F p_nfal-abrkz IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT SINGLE * into lv_zihacase FROM zihacase
   WHERE einri = p_nfal-einri
     AND falnr = p_nfal-falnr.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
lt_nlei = p_nlei[].
CLEAR lt_rnabi1.
REFRESH lt_rnabi1.
LOOP AT lt_nlei ASSIGNING .
Esta función estándar analiza si la prestación ha sido facturada. Tiene en cuenta anulaciones
    CALL FUNCTION 'ISH_CHECK_ABGERECHNET'
      EXPORTING
        einri               = p_nfal-einri
        falnr               = p_nfal-falnr
        lnrls               = -lnrls
        zeitr               = 'X'
      I_NLEI              =
       DETAILED            = 'X'
      READ_PER_CASE       = 'X'
        read_buffer         = 'X'
      EXACT_ABDAT         = ' '
     IMPORTING
        lei_abger           = lv_abger
     TABLES
        e_rnabi1            = lt_rnabi1
    CHANGING
      HIGH_ABDAT          =
    EXCEPTIONS
      NO_EINRI            = 1
      NO_FALNR            = 2
      NO_LNRLS            = 3
      OTHERS              = 4
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
Si el campo LV_ABGER es inicial, quiere decir que no ha sido facturada
    CHECK lv_abger IS NOT INITIAL.
    lv_abmen_p = 0.
    lv_vproz   = 0.
    LOOP AT lt_rnabi1 ASSIGNING -vproz.
    ENDLOOP.
Si hay multicobertura por importe, la cantidad del campo LV_ABMEN_P tiene que sumar 1
Si hay multicobertura por porcentaje, el campo LV_VPROZ debe ser 100
Si se da alguna de estas condiciones, quiere decir que la prestación fue facturada.
se mantiene el >= ya que es posible que, por inconsistncias, las prestacions hayan sido facturadas varias veces.
    IF lv_abmen_p >= 1 OR lv_vproz >= 100.
      DELETE TABLE p_nlei FROM .
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
I hope it helps.
With best regards
Matías

1 items have not been activated due to inconsistent withholding tax info

Hi Experts,
I am doing Vendor Payment through T code:F-53
That time following error coming.
1 items have not been activated due to inconsistent withholding tax info
Message no. F5787
Diagnosis
The open items display different withholding tax information from the relevant business partner master record. For example, the number of withholding tax types in the open item could differ from the number of withholding tax types in the master record.
System Response
Items are not activated.
Procedure
Change the withholding tax data for the open item in question.
waiting for reply,
In advance Thanks & Regards,
Jemes

Dear Jemes,
the Error message F5 787 normally is displayed when you have
activated withholding tax at time of payment.
If at the moment of positing the invoice the vendor was subject to
withholding tax and afterwards, before the payment, the master data
was changed, there is an inconsistencie between the withholding tax
data in the invoice document and the withholding tax data in the master
record.
You should run report RFWT0010 in order to update withholding tax data
in the invoice according to the new withholding tax data information in
the master record. Please read the note 890111 that can be useful as well.
Please let me know.
I hope this helps You.
Mauri

Inconsistent MM FI invoices

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for