Incorrect product number?

Hello all! I just bought a Lenovo notebook, and my trouble is that it *seems* that the product number is different from what I expected.
This is the model I wanted:
http://shop.lenovo.com/it/it/laptops/lenovo/b-series/b590/
The expected product number is MBX3PIX. The P/N of the notebook I bought is instead 59408928. This is what I read at its bottom. The same on the package, with one exception: on the package MBX3PIX is reported, but as MT/Mod code, not as a product number.
So, MBX3PIX is the product number or the MT/Mod code, whatever it means? And where I can find the MBX3PIX code on the notebook itself?
Some other data from notebook bottom and BIOS:
Model Type Name: 6274 3pg
MO: wb0404181b
PS: the tech specs seems to be ok, but I want to be sure this is the model I wanted.

There have been other similar reports here but I assure you it was not intentional. Just a glitch in coding the BIOS update I think.

Similar Messages

Get Product Number using NI-XNET

I'm trying to get the product number and name of the National
Instruments card installed on my computer. According to the manual when
I get the property for nxPropDev_Name I should get NI PCI-8512 (2 ports)
for an NI PCI-8512 device. Instead I get an empty Cstring. For
nxPropDev_ProductNum I should get 8512 for an NI PCI-8512 device, but
instead I get this number: 3435973836.
Below is a snippet of the code I'm using. Is there something I am doing
incorrectly?
Thanks
int propSize;
int cpropSize;
u32 propName;
CString cpropName;
char *l_pSelectedInterface = "CAN2";
char *l_pFrameArray = NULL;
char *l_pSelectedDatabase = ":memory:";
char *l_pSelectedCluster = "";
g_nxStatus = (*m_pNxCreateSession)(l_pSelectedDatabase,
l_pSelectedCluster,
l_pFrameArray,l_pSelectedInterface,
nxMode_FrameInStream, &SessionRef);
g_nxStatus = (*m_pNxGetPropertySize)(SessionRef, nxPropDev_ProductNum,
(u32)(&propSize));
g_nxStatus = (*m_pNxGetProperty)(SessionRef, nxPropDev_ProductNum,
(u32)(propSize),
&propName);
g_nxStatus = (*m_pNxGetPropertySize)(SessionRef, nxPropDev_Name,
(u32)(&cpropSize)); g_nxStatus = (*m_pNxGetProperty)(SessionRef, nxPropDev_Name, (u32)(&cpropSize));

This is probably making the impossible difficult, but you cannot get from the session back to the device directly. It is actually a separate API (right now - ideally we can improve this to make it easier in the future) called the system API to get system->device->interface type of properties.Using the system API, I am doing the following:
1) Open System
2) Get all interfaces in the system
3) Loop on the interfaces until I find one that has a name that matches the desired one
4) Once I get the interface, I can get the device that the interface is a part of
5) Once I get the device, I can then query the device for the required information (Name, Number)
6) Close System
Note: This doesn't do any error checking for simplicity, but it does get the status so you could easily apply error checking to prevent any type of ugly unexpected failures.
int l_NumInterfaces;
int l_PropSize;
u32 l_PropProductNum;
char l_PropProductName[1024];
char l_PropInterfaceName[1024];
nxSessionRef_t l_PropInterfaceRefs[32];
nxSessionRef_t l_SystemRef;
nxSessionRef_t l_SelectedDeviceRef;
char *l_pSelectedInterface = "CAN2";
char *l_pFrameArray = NULL;
char *l_pSelectedDatabase = ":memory:";
char *l_pSelectedCluster = "";
int i;
g_Status = nxSystemOpen(&l_SystemRef);
g_Status = nxGetPropertySize(
l_SystemRef,
nxPropSys_IntfRefs,
&l_PropSize
g_Status = nxGetProperty(
l_SystemRef,
nxPropSys_IntfRefs,
l_PropSize,
l_PropInterfaceRefs
l_NumInterfaces = l_PropSize/sizeof(nxSessionRef_t);
for (i = 0; i < l_NumInterfaces; i++)
g_Status = nxGetPropertySize(
l_PropInterfaceRefs[i],
nxPropIntf_Name,
&l_PropSize
g_Status = nxGetProperty(
l_PropInterfaceRefs[i],
nxPropIntf_Name,
l_PropSize,
l_PropInterfaceName
if (!strcmp(l_PropInterfaceName, l_pSelectedInterface))
g_Status = nxGetProperty(
l_PropInterfaceRefs[i],
nxPropIntf_DevRef,
sizeof(nxSessionRef_t),
&l_SelectedDeviceRef
g_Status = nxGetProperty(
l_SelectedDeviceRef,
nxPropDev_ProductNum,
sizeof(u32),
&l_PropProductNum
g_Status = nxGetPropertySize(
l_SelectedDeviceRef,
nxPropDev_Name,
&l_PropSize
g_Status = nxGetProperty(
l_SelectedDeviceRef,
nxPropDev_Name,
l_PropSize,
l_PropProductName
break;
g_Status = nxSystemClose (l_SystemRef);

My Product description doesn't match (searching by Product number on Lenovo site)

Hi,
I bought Thinkpad X200s on eBay - new, not used. I received it sealed with tape, not opened, hw configuration was exactly as was described/ordered. The numbers on the box are the same as on the notebook.
But when I go on Lenovo site, and check it by product number, I got different result.
My real HW configuration (only what differs):
HDD: 128 GB SSD, 6 cell battery, don't have UltraBase.
(the rest is ok)
This is what I got from Lenovo site, searching by Product number (7466-3GU):
Product: ThinkPad X200s 7466-3GU
Original description: SL9400(1.86GHz), 4GB RAM, 160GB 7200rpm HD, 12.1in 1440x900 LCD, Intel 4500MHD, Intel 802.11agn wireless, Bluetooth, Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, Secure chip, X200 UltraBase+CDRW/DVDRW, Fingerprint reader, Intel Turbo Memory, 9c Li-Ion, WinVista Business 32
When I called on Lenovo support, they told me, it's strange, and that shouldn't happen. I asked them, to check it, if they will get the same result. And they sent me the same product description, as on the Lenovo site. So HDD, battery, and UltraBay differs.
Now I'm affraid, what if I'll have any problem, if they will accept it, or they will tell me, it's not cowered by warranty, because there are not original parts.
Is this a problem? What should I do now?
Thank you for your suggestions.
Karol
P.S.: I apologise for double post, I posted this question already on http://forum.notebookreview.com, but no reply. Then I realised, this is more appropriate forum for this question.

I bought Thinkpad X200s on eBay - new, not used. I received it sealed with tape, not opened, hw configuration was exactly as was described/ordered. The numbers on the box are the same as on the notebook.
But when I go on Lenovo site, and check it by product number, I got different result.
My real HW configuration (only what differs):
HDD: 128 GB SSD, 6 cell battery, don't have UltraBase.
(the rest is ok)
Now I'm affraid, what if I'll have any problem, if they will accept it, or they will tell me, it's not cowered by warranty, because there are not original parts.
Welcome to the forum!
Warranty (if there is one) shouldn't be an issue as the HDD and battery are customer replaceable units (CRU) and the UltraBase isn't required. But... Did you get cheated by the seller? Have you checked to see if it is truly a new unit with the full warranty and not a refurb?
Message Edited by JaneL on 05-28-2009 07:53 AM
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество
Jane
2015 X1 Carbon, ThinkPad Slate, T410s, X301, X200 Tablet, T60p, HP TouchPad, iPad Air 2, iPhone 5S, IdeaTab A2107A, Yoga Tablet, Yoga 3 Pro
I am not a Lenovo Employee.
I AM one of those crazy ThinkPad zealots!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!

Why does Acrobat installation on new PC not accept valid product number?

I bought Acrobat 8 in 2011 and have a valid product number. I just bought a new PC with Windows 8. I downloaded Acrobat 5 from the Adobe website. When it asked for the product ID, I put in the number, and got a response that the number is invalid. I copied the number directly from the purchase record on Adobe.
What is the problem? How can I correct it?

is there a typo in you message?
you state you have acrobat 8 and downloaded acrobat 5.
both should be version 8? if so, http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/error-serial-number-valid-product.html

Please Help! Error message: Incorrect serial number, The serial number you entered is not valid. Click OK to retry serial number.???

My old PC crashed and died, and I am unable to deactivate the licence of Photoshop Elements 7.
I re-installed Photoshop Elements 7 via a trial download from Adobe website onto my new PC, Windows 8.1 single language.
My serial number is not accepted.
Error message: 'Incorrect serial number, The serial number you entered is not valid. Click OK to retry serial number'.
Customer help care is not helpful and keep ending my chat before I get a solution.
Can someone please help me and let me know how I can rectify this problem!!!

Thank you Benjamin MItchley. I reviewed the chat log and I can confirm that they are correct we do not provide installation support for Photoshop Elements 7 due to the age of the software title. Photoshop Elements 7 also does not support activation so there is no risk that you were unable to deactivate the software on your previous computer.
I am showing the serial number under your account was provided from an equipment manufacturer. It is possible there may have been a customized installer for that version. Have you contacted the computer manufacturer to obtain the installation files for the copy of Photoshop Elements 7 included with your computer?
Since you did not migrate/transfer over any files it is unlikely there is a software issue preventing the installation. You can try running the CC Cleaner Tool to ensure that no corrupt licensing files may be preventing the installation process. You can find details of the use of the CC Cleaner Tool at Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6 - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/cs5-cleaner-tool-installation-problems.html.

Power Cord Product Number

I need the product number for a power cord for my laptop. the laptop product numebr os 584037-001. Can anyone hep me?

Looks like either B5T09UA#ABA or X16-96072 or 4-1043cl. Too many nmbers!

Use of vendor product number in shopping cart from personal template

Hi all,
I have the following scenario:
We use ECC 6.0, SRM 5.0 MDM 5.5 sp6 catalog 2.0.
In the inforecord master data in ECC we use the vendor product number (vpn). When a inforecord is created or changed, the inforecords (or changed data in the inforecord) get's replicated to SRM-MDM, just like all of the other masterdata (product, vendor and conditions).
The vpn is included in the details of a catalog product.
When a personal template is generated from a product in the catalog, it's saved with the vpn included.
When the vpn changes in ECC, this number is replicated to the SRM-MDM catalog.
So if you choose the product from the catalog after the canged vpn, the new, right vpn is used in hte shopping cart. But when you use the template that was created before the time the vpn was changed, the old vpn is used in the shopping cart and subsequently the pr and po.
This leads to wrong delivery's.
I've logged an oss call for this, because in my opinion this is a product default. But SAP points me on "standard design". This seems always to be the case when something difficult is asked.
They said it can be solved with a BADI implementation. To be more specific a validation in SRM-MDM with the doc-change Badi.
Is there some one who has experience with this kind of development and knows if this is the whight Badi of has an alternative?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
JvE

Hi,
When a personal template is generated from a product in the catalog, it's saved with the vpn included.
When the vpn changes in ECC, this number is replicated to the SRM-MDM catalog.
So if you choose the product from the catalog after the canged vpn, the new, right vpn is used in hte shopping cart. But when *you use the template that was created before the time the vpn was changed, the old vpn is used in the shopping cart and subsequently the pr and po.
*Solution:
you have told that in MDM -VPN is updated from ECC
Say for Eg : VPN is 12345 in MDM
you have created a shopping cart template with thie VPN : 12345 .
you have ordered the shopping cart the VPN number will be 12345.
After a week this VPN is updated from ECC by 12345ABC
now you have to Delete the old shopping cart template what you have created 12345.
You have to create a new template with VPN :12345ABC and create a shopping cart
How will the VPN change in the Old Template? It is not possbile.
It is not A product bug.
Please try this method what I have suggested
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Output Format of Product Number

Hi,
This is pertaining to issue with Product Number, I am CIFing numeric product.
I am trying to CIF 8 digit Product code from ECC to APO and its getting CIFed as 18 digit code in /SAPAPO/MATMAP table in Extnr Material Number field, while displaying MAT1 its showing as only 8 digit.
I then changed the settings to Field length 18 and activated the lexicographical check in spro in produt master data and also the same setting in OMSL transaction code.
But when I activate the CIF queue with this setting it gives me an error that Product field length is less.
I then changed the spro setting and configured the lenghth as 40 and in OMSL its 18, now the product is getting CIFed with leading zeroes and is also displayed with leading zeroes.
My requirement is that the produt should get CIFed as 8 digit and should also be diaplayed in the table as 8 digit.
Can someone please tell me what should be the setting in spro and OMSL transaction so that their are no leading zeroes displayed and also in SAP table its not stored with leading zeroes.
When I create the product directly in APO their are no leading zeroes in table and display.
Thanks & Regards,
Sanjog mishrikotkar

Hi Sanjog,
The following are the settings where the output format of a
product number will be maintained
In R/3, the lexicographic setting will be done in spro>logistics-general>
material master>basic settings>define output format of material numbers.
In APO, it is done at spro>APO>Master data>Product>specify output format
of product numbers.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Please confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

SRM Vendor product number field populating to PR

Hi,
We are trying to pass "Vendor product Number" value from non-catalog sc to purchase requisition "Vendor Mat" field using BAP_REQUISITION_CREATE. However, the value entered on shopping cart is not coming to PR.
We are on SRM 50. searched oss notes and found couple of them..but it seems they are not relevant for our version.
appreciate any inputs on this.
Thanks
Krish

Hi Krishna,
In whcih field you are entering vendor mat no in shopping cart
Thnaks
Ravi

Vendor Product Number field

Can anyone please help us finding the field " Vendor Product Number". We have the information that this is a standard field on the shopping cart and is part of the standard content and This field is also available on Catalog Purchase Orders
Please help us recognizing the appropriate field tech name from the shopping cart extractor.
Hints are appreciated

Hi Masa,
Appreciate your prompt response. My issue is not Vendor Part Number. We are using Manufacturer Part Number field in our SRM-MDM catalogs. OCI is transferring the data in this field to SRM SC but it is not displaying in Item Data tab in SC. I can see the Manufacturer Part Number value transferred from catalog in Tcode BBP_PD. As per your earlier reply, I added field MANU_PROD (Manufacturer Part Number) in Customer Meta Data for Item fields in Personalization is SPRO. After adding this field here, it should be displayed in SRM SC Item Data tab but it is not displaying there.
We are not facing any problem with field Supplier PArt Number and iit is displaying correctly in the SRM SC.
Thanks

How could it be possible to check the product number here to find that it is not factory reject?, How could it be possible to check the product number here to find that it is not factory reject?

How could it be possible to check the product number online to find that it is not factory rejection?
My product is Iphone 5 by the way.

<https://selfsolve.apple.com/agreementWarrantyDynamic.do>

Use old product number for new product.

Dear all,
I have to manage the following case.
From a defined date the engineering releases a new product that will substitute an old product.
The marketing doesnu2019t want to change material number and would you like to use the old product number also for new product.
This solution has a great impact for planning because there is not possible to distinguish the old product stock from new product stock.
Could you help me?
Regards
Flavia Borselli

Hi,
I think one opption is discontinuation that was invited for such cases I thnk. You can set the new part number as the follow-up material of the old one - in this case planning will run smoothly hopefully...
That would mean that they should use new part number but there would be some connection between the new and old one...
Split valuation is another tool to make difference between batches from different origins when the material number is the same. But you wrote batch management is not active...
If you use WM you can store the new & old goods separatly but I wouldn't prefer such solutions...
BR
Csaba

Query using system parameter LEVEL returns incorrect huge number of records

We migrate our database from Oracle *9.2.0.6* to *11.2.0.1*
The query below throws "ORA-01788: CONNECT BY clause required in this query block".
select * from (
+select a.BOARD_ID, code, description, is_displayable, order_seq, board_parent_id, short_description, IS_SUB_BOARD_DISPLAYABLE, LEVEL child_level, sp_board.get_parent_id(a.board_id) top_parent_id, is_top_selected isTopSelected+
from boards a, ALERT_MESSAGE_BOARD_TARGETS b
where a.board_id = b.board_id and is_displayable = 'Y' and alert_message_id = 5202) temp
start with board_parent_id = 0
connect by prior board_id = board_parent_id
ORDER SIBLINGS BY order_seq;
Based from online resources we modified "*_allow_level_without_connect_by*" by executing the statement.
alter system set "_allow_level_without_connect_by"=true scope=spfile;
After performing the above, ORA-01788 is resolved.
The new issue is that the same query above returns *9,015,853 records in 11g* but in *9i it returns 64 records*. 9i returns the correct number of records. And the cause for 11g returning greater number of records is due to system parameter LEVEL used in the query.
Why 11g is returning an incorrect huge number of records?
Any assistance to address this is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

The problem lies in th query.
Oracle LEVEL should not be used inside a subquery. After LEVEL is moved in the main query, the number of returned records is the same as in 9i.
select c.BOARD_ID, c.code, c.description, c.is_displayable, c.order_seq, c.board_parent_id, c.short_description, c.IS_SUB_BOARD_DISPLAYABLE, LEVEL child_level, c.top_parent_id, c.isTopSelected
from (
select a.BOARD_ID, code, description, is_displayable, order_seq, board_parent_id, short_description, IS_SUB_BOARD_DISPLAYABLE, sp_board.get_parent_id(a.board_id) top_parent_id, is_top_selected isTopSelected
from boards a, ALERT_MESSAGE_BOARD_TARGETS b
where a.board_id = b.board_id and is_displayable = 'Y' and alert_message_id = 5202
) c
start with c.board_parent_id = 0
connect by prior c.board_id = c.board_parent_id
ORDER SIBLINGS BY c.order_seq

Search for Vendor product number

Hi everyone,
When i create a shopping cart from internal goods and services, i can search a product on product id, product description etc.
How can i modify this page so that i can search for the vendor product number?
All information is welcome!!
Regards,
Jordi

I know where i can change the template.
I am working in transaction se11 with searchhelp: bbph_product --> bbph_product_general, here i can add fields to the search screen(vendor product number?).
This searchhelp is linked to the Function module: bbp_f41f_shlp_exit_product_gen.
In this function module is the logica maintaind how to search(ABAP code).
From here i don't know what to do further.
I want the system (searchhelp) to search for the vendor product number in the inforecords located in ECC.
Annybody who can help me?
Regards,
Jordi

Reversal voucher for an invoice paid to the incorrect PO Number

Hi, We have paid some vouchers to the incorrect PO number. I thought we could do a reversal voucher against the incorrect voucher, then the PO would be open to apply the correct voucher to it. It appears the receipt is not backed out. Has anyone used this function and could guide us in what needs to happen.

Hi
I guess you receive different invoices for both the POs. The process of raising a credit memo is the best way to solve this issue. Did you think about cancelling the Invoice document in MR8M if it is feasible, here this will affect your stock accounts based upon the current stock position for the said Invoice/PO quanity.
One more additional check you can have is to use to activate the check box "check doubel invoice" below Tolerance Group in the Vendor payment Transactions Accounting view of vendor master. This will help you to restrict the entry of wrong PO attached to the invoice if you have already processed the Invoice (provided you are using the reference field in MIRO by entering the INVOICE number of the PO).
Regards
SAM

Incorrect product number?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for