Incorrect Transaction Type displayed in FF_6

Hi Experts,
We use FF_5 to upload bank statements .
However transactions which are marked as "Transfer" are reflecting in FF_6 as "PAY/SALARY " .
There are some config changes required .
Please suggest .
Regards
Anirban

Hi,
Go to bellow link
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/8390441/82821894/name/bankreconciliationconfiguration.pdf
Thanks,
Raviteja

Similar Messages

"Manage Users" IR report displaying incorrect user types

Home>Administration>Users
APEX 4.0.2.00.07
DB 11.2.0.2
Found a couple of question-raising things:
1) User type is showing "Workspace Administrator" for almost all users (many are only users) with a couple identified as "Developer" (who really do only have developer privs turned on). If I knew the sql for the IR report I might find the problem - checked wwv_flow_fnd_user and wwv_flow_developers and they both look OK (no recs in wwv_flow_developers for the end users and those with given admin privs are marked as admin, etc.). Did find one dup group name but removing it didn't seem to have an effect.
2) Trying to find out what is going on I found the second: It appears that if you have assigned more than one group to a user (apex group to apex user), then add the group_name column to the Manage Users IR, you get the "single row subquery returns more than one row".
Haven't found any other posts here on this. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Steve

Thanks Richard - forgot about the builder import.
After taking the IR sql and working it I found the following:
In this apex installation...
There seems to be a problem with the outer join between wwv_flow_developers and wwv_flow_fnd_user which brings non-null values for d.is_admin and d.is_developer (and for us these are 'Y' if there are no matching records in wwv_flow_developers.
Changing the decode for DEV_TYPE to use a nvl for d.userid to set all users to end user if they are not in the wwv_flow_developers table fixes the display of user type.
Now I am guessing this is a data anomaly rather than a bug. Anyone have any ideas on why the outer join to wwv_flow_developers shows a not-null value for is_admin and is_developer?
Steve
Here is a mostly-intact version of the region source (I shortened it considerably from the code below to focus on the incorrect USER TYPE display issue):
select /* APEX4350P55a */
USER_ID,
u.user_name "USER",
u.email_address "eMail",
u.first_name,
u.last_name,
replace(u.default_schema,'%'||'null%',null) df,
decode(nvl(d.is_developer,'N'),'Y', (select case
when (wwv_flow_fnd_user_api.workspace_account_days_left(
wwv_flow_user_api.get_username(user_id)) > 0)
then m.password_valid
else m.password_expired
end expiration from dual),
m.no_developer_priv) developer,
decode (nvl(d.is_developer,'N'),'Y',last_login,null) last_login,
decode (nvl(d.is_developer,'N'),'Y',last_login,null) last_login2,
decode (nvl(d.is_developer,'N'),'Y',
nvl(builder_login_count,0),null) builder_login_count,
decode(nvl(u.account_locked,'N'),'Y',m.yes,m.n)ul,
case
when (wwv_flow_fnd_user_api.end_user_account_days_left(
wwv_flow_user_api.get_username(user_id)) > 0)
then m.password_valid
else m.password_expired
end expiration,
u.DESCRIPTION,
u.PASSWORD_LIFESPAN_DAYS,
u.PASSWORD_LIFESPAN_ACCESSES,
u.PASSWORD_ACCESSES_LEFT,
u.LAST_AGENT,
u.LAST_IP,
u.ACCOUNT_EXPIRY,
u.FAILED_ACCESS_ATTEMPTS,
u.CHANGE_PASSWORD_ON_FIRST_USE,
u.FIRST_PASSWORD_USE_OCCURRED,
decode(nvl(d.is_admin,'N'),'Y',
m.admin,decode(nvl(d.is_developer,'N'),
'Y',m.dev,m.end_user)) dev_type,
(select group_id from WWV_FLOW_FND_GROUP_USERS where user_id = u.user_id) group_id,
(select GROUP_NAME from WWV_FLOW_FND_USER_GROUPS where id = (select group_id from WWV_FLOW_FND_GROUP_USERS where user_id = u.user_id)) group_name,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
nvl(d.developer_type,'END_USER') developer_type,
decode(nvl(ALLOW_APP_BUILDING_YN,'Y'),'Y',m.yes,m.n) ALLOW_APP_BUILDING,
decode(nvl(ALLOW_SQL_WORKSHOP_YN,'Y'),'Y',m.yes,m.n) ALLOW_SQL_WORKSHOP,
decode(nvl(ALLOW_WEBSHEET_DEV_YN,'Y'),'Y',m.yes,m.n) ALLOW_WEBSHEET_DEV,
decode(nvl(ALLOW_TEAM_DEVELOPMENT_YN,'Y'),'Y',m.yes,m.n) ALLOW_TEAM_DEVOPMENT
from WWV_FLOW_FND_USER u,
(select USERID,
decode(instr(DEVELOPER_ROLE,'ADMIN'),0,'N','Y') is_admin,
'Y' is_developer,
case
when instr(DEVELOPER_ROLE,'BASIC_DEV') > 0 then
'BASIC_DEV'
when instr(DEVELOPER_ROLE,'ADMIN') > 0 then
'ADMIN'
when instr(DEVELOPER_ROLE,'CREATE') > 0 then
'DEVELOPER'
else
'UNKNOWN'
end developer_type
from WWV_FLOW_DEVELOPERS
where security_group_id = :flow_security_group_id) d,
(select wwv_flow_lang.system_message('F4000.NO') n,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('F4000.YES') yes,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('PASSWORD_VALID') password_valid,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('PASSWORD_EXPIRED') password_expired,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('NO_DEVELOPER_PRIV') no_developer_priv,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('DEVELOPER') dev,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('ADMINISTATOR') admin,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('END_USER') end_user,
wwv_flow_lang.system_message('BASIC_DEVELOPER') basic_developer
from dual) m
where
u.user_name = d.userid(+) and
u.security_group_id = :flow_security_group_id
Edited by: stevehoward on Jul 6, 2011 11:37 AM
Edited by: stevehoward on Jul 6, 2011 11:40 AM

SEM BCS V6.03SP4 - COI - Total divestiture - transaction type incorrect

Hi,
I want to manage the activity total divestiture (N°11)
When I executed the task COI, the system for items and balance is correct but for the transaction type is incorrect.
Indeed, for the company who sells the investment , the system uses the OPENING FLOW (001 - F00) !
Do you now how to manage this correction in order to have the divestiture flow ?
NB : I don't see the SAP notes for this correction
Thanks by advance
Bastien

FYI
I applied the sap notes 1742121 and 134940
The transaction type is correct for earning item
But for investment item , we have already the opening transaction type!
Reminder opening code
001 for standard BCS
M01 with preconfiguration IFRS
F00 with BFc codification
Bastien

Changing max row display in personalization of particular transaction type

Hi,
Is there any way to change the Maximum number of visible rows to be displayed in personalization of search result for a particular transaction type?
Thanks.

Solved myself.

How to display Transaction Type & description ?

Guys,
I am using CRM 5.0. When I am in CRMD_ORDER Transaction and try to create a new order, I get a pop-up list to choose my transaction types. However it only displays the description of the transaction type and does not give me the transaction ID.
Is there a way to display both in tow separate columns? For eg TSA Telesales

A.R.P,
see if this helps.
Click on Customizing of local layout on the standard SAP toolbar. (last icon with green red blue vertical stripes) 
From the context menu that opens, select the first option - options 
Go to the Expert tab and select the check boxes for :
 Show Keys in All Dropdown list 
 Sort Items by key 
Then choose the apply push button and then the ok button.
Julius

Controling field display by Transaction Type

Hello,
Is it possible to control field display by Transaction Type in CRM 7.0 anymore given that we have the Web UI now. I remember from my 5.0 experience that we used CRMV_SSC to control this at transaction type. I would imagine, the functionality has not been taken away but rather changed to a different place where we control this. Anybody dealt with a similar requirement? Any ideas / suggestions/ tips?
Essentially for transaction ZOR1 we want to surpress a tab / fields, but for ZOR2 we want to keep those available. ZOR1 and ZOR2 belong to the same transaction category.
Thanks in advance..
KK

Kevin,
This is all controlled now by Configurations in the WebUI, along with the Component/view. As an example, via the WebUI try going into each of the transaction types. You have not said what kind of transaction types you were referring to, so I'm just going to assume it's Opportunities for the time-being. So, If you click on each of the transaction types and when the screen is displayed place the cursor on an editable field and press F2. This will then display the technical details behind the screen. Here you'll see that each tranx type has it's component/view name and context node. You will also see the configuration as well. So, the transaction types are actually controlled by the code and screen design behind the component and view, but there can be a different screen layouts for the same tranx type dependning of the configuration used. And, this configuration is normally identified by the business role that you're currently using.
So if that was a bit wordy, but if you look at the technical details behind each of the tranx types it should become clear.
Jason

Display buttons by Transaction type and Roles

Hi Experts,
I have created a button in the BT115IT_SLSO/items view, using the DO_PREPARE_OUTPUT method. now I want to display this button only to a specific transaction type and business role, how can I achieve this. Tool bar related methods are not present for this view.
Thanks,
S Reddy

Hi,
This has been discussed in the forum already...
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=27175485&messageID=7619188
Re: Business Role of logged in user
Always search first and check if there is anything already discussed, this will save a lot of your time.
Regards,
Masood Imrani S.

Locator area displays unauthoritative business transaction types

Hi,
I created a service business transaction type (ZXXX). Some users can see the details of this BT in the locator area (nearly all of the fields) although they have no authority for displaying. Indeed when they double click the relaited row for ZXXX, systems warns "There is no authorization for displaying...".
So i want they are not able to see these documents in the locator area.
Regards.
Sadi Yılmaz

Our system already had business area link to each plant.
However I don't think the business area value is defaulted from plant as a plant can be link to multiple business areas. Based on a plant, how do system determined which business area to be pulled to MIRO?
the business ares a is linked to the plant (and not the way back), that means from a plant you have always a unique busines area. This is set up in transaction OMJ7, pls have a look
We don't turn on the business area balance sheet (OB65). Would you please kindly advise what will be the impact to turn this on?
quite a lot... In this case don't turn it on, but that also means there won't be automatic derivation (whatever you customized in previous step)
One last question the enhancement LMR1M001 to derived the business area, from what data will system derive the business area (from vendor master, Purchase order or from where?)
it just depends on your coding, but basically you have the information in the exit, what you have normally in MIRO.
Would be good to know, what is your exact requirement, why you want to use business area in case of MIRO postings (and in case of other postings as well).

Transaction types are not getting displayed in WUI CRM7.0

Hello Gurus
After upgrading the CRM system from 4.0 to 7.0 we are not able to see the trasaction types for the activity mangment in WUI....i have also assigned the transaction types to the channel CEM Webclient UI
Suggest how to over come this ...
Regards
Sree

Hi sreeram,
go to crm -> transactions -> basic settings -> define transaction types
copy default email cx03 and create new zemail.
assign that zemail to bus2000126 business activity.select the business activity and click on customizing header.assign the category email. click on channel. maintain the channels 1)GUI crm webclient UI, 2)ICW Interaction center webclient.
save the changes.
go to crm -> transactions -> basic settings -> settings for activities -> maintain categories, goals, priorities -> click on assign categories to transaction types.
assign the category email(which you have assigned above) to the transaction type zemail.
even check maintain categories as well
click on maintain categories -> check 401 email assigned to class G email.
Regards
Krishna

No display of Z-ACTIVITY transaction types in UI

Hello All
i had created two activity transaction types (task and appointment) but when i checked the same in UI fortesting, i could not see them in Activities-> TASK/appointment rather i could see them under option INTETRACTION LOGS.
Please let me know how can i make available newly created transaction types under selection option TASK/APPOINTMENT.
Regards
Phani

Thanks for your quick reply...
i had checked the category and it is TASK but could you please let em know when can i check Category and CLASS(203,interaction log) assignment.
infact ,i had created Z-TASK as a copy of standard 1003 type
Thanks
Phani

Adobe 8 - Unexpected Corrupt or incorrect file type warning when viewing a PDF file from the Web

Hi,
On downloading a PDF file from my web site using Adobe 8 on the client machine I expect the file to open automatically however I receive encounter the "File Download" dialog. It has the following warning message: "The file you are downloading cannot be opened by the default program. It is either corrupted or it has an incorrect file type. As a security precaution, it is recommended that you cancel the download."
This issue did not occur within previously tested versions of Adobe Reader (e.g. Version 5.1).
On investigating the issue I discovered the factor that results in Adobe 8 failing to open the file automatically is the Content-Type = "application/pdf; Charset=utf-8". However, if I intercept the response and alter the Content-Type to contain only "application/pdf;" the issue on Adobe 8 does not occur.
I have even tested when the Content-Type contains an empty Charset (i.e. "application/pdf; Charset=") but this issue still occurs. In addition setting the Charset to other encodings (e.g. "ISO-LATIN-7", "iso-8859-1") the issue occurs.
QUESTION(s):
1. Why is it necessary for Adobe 8 when opening PDF files from the web to expect no Charset within the Content-Type?
2. If this was not an issue within previous versions of Adobe surly this is a bug?
Since I cannot ensure that the Response's Content-Type does not contain a Charset at all please can someone suggest either a work-around or more importantly a solution to the issue?
Please Note:-
1. Within Adobe, Edit -> Preferences -> Internet option it's compulsory for our users to have "Display PDF in browser" ticked!
2. We cannot prevent a Charset from being present within the Content-Type of the response sent to the client, hence this issue.
Many Thanks in advance,
Martin.

Bill,
This is exactly the same behavior I observed when I rendered a PDF stored in a database through a .NET page. If I chose to save it, it would open fine after the save, but if I chose to open it in the browser without saving it, I would get the error.
The problem was not with the PDF or Acrobat. It was with the way I was delivering the PDF. Putting the following code before my binarywrite fixed the issue completely:
Response.ClearHeaders()
Response.ClearContent()
Response.ContentType = "application/octet-stream"
Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", "attachment; filename=" + saveFilename)
where saveFileName is the name you want to give the PDF.
You can use 'inline' instead of 'attachment' above if you just want the PDF to open (no option to save first). You can also use 'pdf' instead of 'octet-stream' (not sure the difference).
The trouble seems to be that .NET puts some info in the header and/or content by default prior to anything your code says to write. If you don't clear this, IE has an issue with it. Other browsers seem to ignore it.
Bottomline is that this is an issue the website programmer needs to fix and is not something the user can fix by changing some setting(s).
I hope this helps.

"No transaction type is available for creating a transaction" service order

Hi all,
I am new in IC .
I try to create service order or service ticket for incoming calls
We are using CRM 7.0
After I confirm the account I try to create service order
But no screen displayed and error "No transaction type is available for creating a transaction" occurs
in customizing there is a transaction type SRVO, also I copied it to ZRVO
But here how can I define that this transaction type is assigned to this application??
Please reply in detail steps.
Thank you.

Hi Rupesh,
Thanks for your reply..
I made a lot of controls but I can't find where I am wrong..
My senario is, taking phones, create interaction record and create order for further investigation.
I copied IC_AGENT role.
I copied transaction type 0010 to Z010
I create business transaction named ZBTP for transaction type Z010
I made Define Transaction Types for Navigation for Z010
Then Define Business Role -> Assign Function Profiles
Here I assign my business transaction ZBTP to IC_BT function profile
But when I connect tot the system with user having this business role
I can create interaction record with type Z010, it is ok.
When I press Service Order it gives this error.
Work center id for Service order is : IC_UIU_SVO
I copied my business role from IC_AGENT, and here this work center id was not active
In my business role I made it active. Is this work center can't used in IC senario
Also how can I understand which transaction type is needed for it??
If I know which transaction type is needed to create service order or service ticket under IC, then I will control it of course..
I also copied transaction type TSVO(service IC) to ZSVO and do the above things for this type too..
But nothing changed..
Please help !!

Limit transaction types when creating follow-up transactions

Hi! We are operating in CRM 5. We have a requirement to only display certain tasks when creating followup document from an existing activity. Now, I thought that the copy control configuration would do the trick but I still see a big list of tasks, activities and sales transaction types appearing on the screen (as good as creating a new independent document). Can someone please confirm whether this requirement is at all possible in CRM 5?
Cheers!
SF

Hi,
We had a similar requirement. We used implemented CRM_ORDER badi and used the method ENQUEUE.
We wrote a logic to check the object type and process type of the transaction and also its doc flow.
If there is no doc flow available a logic is written to throw an error message as no standalone document can be created.
You can try implementing this badi and write a code in it.
Also you can throw custom message if user tries to created standalone orders.
Regards,
PP

Posting with transaction type 160 is not possible at MR8M

MODERATOR: Do not post (or request) email address or links to copyrighted or confidential information on these forums. If you do, the thread will be LOCKED and all points UNASSIGNED. If you have some information, please consider posting it to the [Wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Home] rather than sharing via email. Thank you for your assistance.
Hi All,
We raised a PO w.r.t CWIP asset and posted GRN (MIGO - Transaction typr:100) and Invoice (MIRO).
Here, Invoice posted wrongly, So we are trying to reverse the invoice with MR8M (which is posted thru MIRO).
But system populating one message as per the following:
Posting with transaction type 160 is not possible here, see long text
Message no. AAPO 177
Diagnosis:
Transaction type 160 has a depreciation limitation, although posting is not mandatory in all of the depreciation areas entered However, it is not possible to select depreciation areas in the current transactions.
Procedure:
Check the specification of transaction type 160 or use transaction MR8M to enter the transaction
Please help
Sairavi
kumarfi9gmailcom

Welcome to the forum.
As a newbie you should understand the forum rules where you are not suppose to post any basic or repeated question. To avoid this, you should make a search here
[Forum Search|http://forums.sdn.sap.com/search!default.jspa?objID=f327]
Type the same error text in Search Terms so that you will find the solution.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

FBV1 error - Transaction Type 030 not possible

Hi SAP experts,
I am currently facing an issue while in FBV1 (via batch input)
It displays error message Transaction Type 030 not possible (posting to affiliated company), however, the asset group that it belongs to can only be Type 030 (Acquisition in group area only).
How can this be fixed?
Is there another TType that is similar to 030 ?
Any help is welcome
Regards
Roger

Hi,
check SAPNET note 127650.
Best regards

Incorrect Transaction Type displayed in FF_6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for