GL Balance Report output not Matching with Material Stock

Hi,
Can we Match Reports MB5B (Stock on Posting Date) and S_ALR_87012301 (G/L Account Balance)???
Till March these reports are matching but from April 11, data not matching..
In tcode MB5B, we are looking Valuated Stock of Materials and in tcode s_alr_87012301 showing balances, which were matching earlier..
Plz guide...

Dear:
Execute the stock GL in FS04 to track the history of changes made to it. It is quite possible that post automatically tick was changed and some direct posting were made against this GL which ultimately caused discrepancies. If track is showing post automatic tick changed then it means some direct posting were made to it, Note the period in which it was changed and analyze the posting against this GL in that time span.
Regards

Similar Messages

India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance

We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
Please help.
Regards
Suresh

user702249 wrote:
We have Changed one segment in cash account and cash clearing account for internal petty cash account.
After changing the segment, Closing balance of India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.
Please help.
Regards
SureshPlease do not post duplicates -- India cash/bank book report is not matching with GL balance.

The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account

Hi Gurus,
The creditors report is not matching with the G/L account ,where i can go and find out the differences ?
Please give me advice,
I will assign points
Thanks&Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
There could be three reasons.
1. You may have more than one recon accounts for different vendor groups. So, you need to select all the GL accounts when reconcile with Vendor balances.
2. You may have some special GL transactions, which may post to different reconciliation accounts. Please check Special GL transactions (Down payments so on)
3. Your vendor recon accounts may be changed after some postings. Please check. If changed, you need to select these GLs also for reconciliation with vendor balances.
Hope this will help you. If not clear please reply, I will explain you.
Pl. assign points if useful.
Thanks

RG1 Register : opening & closing balance does not match with actual Stock

Hi
I am working on SAP AFS 6.0.
The RG1 register for a particular month displays data of only those materials which have been transacted in that month. I checked the tables J_1IRG1 and J_2IRG1BAL found that system retrives all records of the given period from the table J_1IRG1 and picks opening balance of these records from the table J_2IRG1BAL. The records of those materials which have closing balance in J_2IRG1BAL but was not transacted in the given period are not considered in RG1 register.
I want RG1 register to show opening balance of all materials which have closing balance in J_2IRG1BAL but have not been transacted in the subsequent periods.
Regards
Niraj

HI
Yes it is mandatory to update the table J_2IRG1BAL with material form and opening stock etc. for all the new materials
EXGRP: Excise group of the material
DATUM: Date from which you want RG1 report i.e. 01.01.2004
MATNR: Material
FORM: P for packed, L for loose. note that the same material cannot be maintained as both packed and loose.
WERKS: Leave it blank
Maintain all relevant opening balance fields. These fields start with OP
Note 951955 - CIN: General clarifications for RG1 goods*
check the above note
regards
Prashanth

Investment order reporting does not match with AM

Hello,
We are exectuing two reports 1) internal order report( for investment order) and asset history sheet.
Both the report figures should match. but due to some reason the internal order report shows less value than asset history sheet.
What can be the possible reason for the differences.
BR,
Zulfikar

Hi
Check whether the sales order creation date and actually when you created the delivery ? if say u created the sales order yesterday with yesterday date as delivery date and carried out delivery process to day means. The delivery date in the delivery process will be today date in that case delivery date wont match with sales order. This is one case like that so many cases are there.
Material might not be confirmed etc....
Regards,
Mullai

KE30 report is not matching with KE24

Hi Experts,
In our Production System erroneously, COPA documents were archived during September 2010 (01.09.2010 to 16.09.2010).
Subsequently, these documents were re-created by SAP Standard transactionsKE4S and KE4SFI.
Before and after restoring COPA documents, KE30 report is not tallying when we compare with KE24 - especially for September 2010 month. It isworking fine for other months - like August and October 2010.
In view of the above, could you kindly provide us possible solution to make KE30 will work even for September 2010 - similar to other months.
Thanks & Regards,
Satya Srinivas

I'm not sure whether your KE30 report accesses summarization level data or not, but if you do use summarization levels in CO-PA, follow the steps below to correct this issue. Archive/Deletion removes line items from CE1XXXX but segment table CE3XXXX is not updated at this time which will cause the inconsistency. so..
Rebuild Segment table CE3XXXX for the complete fiscal year with program RKEREO31 (Reorganization of Segment Level - Actual) ..refer to SAP note 93051 for the complete guidelines..
(ii) After this, rebuild summarization levels using transaction KEDU as background job.
I have personally done these steps few times at different clients, you need to plan this properly and execute couple of times in testing system to estimate the run time and check the differences.
Regards,
Ganesh

SM37 spool output not matched with the mail received

Hi All
I have a background job which run on daily basis. After the job is finished successfully the spool is sent to client in the form of the html page.
The mail received by client and the actual spool in R3 are not matching.
Some of the text is missing at the end of the lines. Say like a row having 300 characters in the actual spool R3, 280 characters are only showing in the received mail of client, last 20 characters are missing.
How to check the settings of Page width in SAP R3.
Should i check the settings in the Mail configuration.
Please advise
Regards

Hi
Thank you for all the replies.
The issue is related to the width of the output missing.
The spool output is fine. Once this output is generated this wil be send to the spool recipient.
spool output is different in the spool recipient and actual spool output produced in SM37. i.e The width of the spool received in the spool receipient is missed. length is ok but widh is missing.
Should i check in mail settings. Please help me
Regards,

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments

Dear Consultants
I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.
As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03 effect is as follows.
1.     GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
                31.03.2009
2.     GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 2000 segment in P & M at
                31.03.2009
After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
AR02 segment wise.
3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
Cross check points:
1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
3. No Manual Entries has been posted
So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on 31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values.
--Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
--Depreciation not yet posted.
--client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to
match with legacy balance
--So ,I dont think it is not problem if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
--Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
early reply will be very highly appreicated
Regards
Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AM

Hello,
Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
Regards,
Ravi

F_IT_01 does not match with FAGLGVTR

Hello All,
What is the reason for report F_IT_01 not matching with FAGLGVTR
Please advice

Hello,
I would not advise you to do such things in your environment.2 mins is very less time how could you be so sure a 2 min query is bad. And your second point is totally baseless it wouldtake a query a fraction of secondto read 1000 rows.My answer would be please
dont implement.
If you want to test below query might achieve the first requirement, I have not tested it please treat this query as hint and optimize or add anything if required.
If you schedule this query through agent for every 2 mins or 5 mins .It can achieve.But some query takes more time to rollback than to finish scheduling this would lead to unstable environment
USE MASTER
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TEMPDB.SYS.ALL_OBJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE '#KILL_CONNECTION')
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
END
CREATE TABLE #KILL_CONNECTION
SESSION_ID INT
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME BIGINT
,START_TIME DATETIME
INSERT INTO #KILL_CONNECTION
SELECT
SESSION_ID
,TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME
,START_TIME
FROM SYS.DM_EXEC_REQUESTS
WHERE TOTAL_ELAPSED_TIME > 7200 AND SESSION_ID > 50
DECLARE @SESSION_ID BIGINT
DECLARE @CMD VARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE KILL_CONNECTION CURSOR FOR
SELECT SESSION_ID
FROM #KILL_CONNECTION
OPEN KILL_CONNECTION
FETCH NEXT FROM KILL_CONNECTION INTO @SESSION_ID
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SET @CMD = 'KILL ' + @SESSION_ID
EXECUTE (@CMD)
END
CLOSE KILL_CONNECTION
DEALLOCATE KILL_CONNECTION godrop table #Kill_connection
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

Fund center reports Assigned values are not matching with ledger balances.

Thanks for your Support. We have activated funds management in May-2009. And deactivated one or two times. Now the status is active.
Now we are taking reports the assigned values are not matching with gl ledger balances.
1. We need to update records for April- May.
2. Records in between deactivated and activate time.
Please suggest updating fund centers and commitments.
Regards

hi ELI
i have checked the follwoing secnarios
1. funds management deactivated.
2. one document posted with amount10000
3. funds management activated.
4. we have executed FMN0
here no document is selected after execution.
Please suggest what are the activities we need to do if i am wrong...
Regards

Trail balance is not matching with fagll03 report

friends,
our trial balance is showing one value and fagllo3 individual gl is showing another value, particularly in entry view it is showing other value, it is showing some small difference. is there any program to match trail and fagll03.
regards,

Hi Team,
Greetings for the Day,
I have the same issue, please suggest me on this.
Trial Balance report for period 01-09, is not matching with the report from FAGLL03.
I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this, thanks.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.
[email protected]

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

Hi,
I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
Yogini

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
gl_daily_balances
gl_code_combinations
chart_of_accounts
And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
So, I tried the following :
(Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'U'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
MINUS
( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'C'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
Yogini

GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table

Hi,
I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
Thanks
Arun

But that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data

GL Balance Report output not Matching with Material Stock

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for