Infopath Approval With Multiple Approvers

I am interested in having multiple people approve forms.  The user will select the approvers using a people picker (tied to our active directory.)  I would like to know if it is possible to have the form be approved my multiple people at the same
time, instead of a daisy chain. 
There will be a maximum of 5 approvers, but may only have 1. 
Can someone get me pointed in the right direction please.

Hi alex,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to make multiple people to approve a form at the same time, and the number of the approvers is dynamic.
You can create a column based People&Group type, and on the Additional Column Settings section, set "Choose from: All users".
Then create a workflow with SharePoint Deisgner 2013, and the workflow is using SharePoint 2010 workflow platform. And After adding the "Start Approval Process", click the
these users, and then set the approver using "Workflow lookup for a user", like the screenshot:
Then, on the Lookup for People or Group dialog, Data source: Current Item, Field from source: the people&group column that you created.
Finnally, save and publish the workflow.
After the above, when you create a new item, you can type the approvers in the people&group column. After triggering the workflow, it will assign tasks to all people in the people&group column.
Best Regards,
Wendy
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Single step workflow with multiple approvers (without using a group)

    Hi,
    is it possible to have a single step workflow with multiple approvers without using a group? This is for a contract document.
    i want to add a number of users based on particular logic. The approvers are random and do not belong to any particular group.
    DO let me know if it is possible or if any of you have done that.
    thanks in advance.
    regards,
    rubio

    Hi Rubio,
    I believe the behavior would be, if individual users are added as approvers then the system would require each approver to approve the document. However, if you use the user group, you could set the role so that it would be either ALL or ANY.
    Regards,
    Vikram

  • Approval workflow with multiple approvers in sharepoint

    Hi All,
    I have created a sequential workflow using visual studio 2012 for sharepoint 2013.
    I have multiple approvers for approving a document. I am able to create individual tasks for each approver by code
    my problem here is tasks should be created based upon the hierarchy, i.e. the second task will be created only when first task is approved.
    All my approvers are dynamic so I did this development in visual studio. Please give me some idea how to proceed for my problem.
    Sarath Sannadi Sharepoint Dev at Saksoft

    Hi sarath,
    Thanks for the sharing.
    Regards,
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Sending Approval Request to multiple Approvers

    Hi All,
    I'm facing problem in sending Approval request to multiple approvers.I have List of accountid's to which approval Requet has to be sent.I tried giving multiple id's in the "Owner" field of mannual action, which is not working.can any one let me know how to implement this.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I used multi approval subprocess, this is the code that i have used
    <Action id='0' process='Configuration:Multi Approval'>
    <Argument name='approver'>
    <ref>$(approver)</ref>
    </Argument>
    <Argument name='approvalForm'>
    <ref>New Profile Request</ref>
    </Argument>
    </Action>
    but im unable to get the approval request in the corresponding Administrator approval list.

  • Dynamic Approver Group Will Not Return Multiple Approvers

    We have created a dynamic approval group to return person_ids (stored in a lookup) for some of HR operations people. This will be called by an FYI rule.
    The problem is that AME seems to fail if mulitple person_ids are returned by the dynamic query.
    Is it even possible for a dynamic approval group to return multiple person_ids? If so what could I be missing?
    P.S. I realize I can use a static approver group to meet the same requirement but the reason we choose a lookup was it made it easier for us to maintain. We can revert to a static group if there is no other solution.

    We overcame the problem by splitting out each person_id into a different row in the lookup table.
    Multiple approvers are now being returned.

  • Multiple approvers and one approver execute the workitem without complete

    Hi all,
    In case of multiple approvers, if approver-A executed the workitem but cancel it without complete.  The workitem will stay only in approver-A SAP inbox and disappear from other approvers' inboxes.  Is this a standard way?
    For whatever reason, if approver-A cannot execute the workitem.  What can be done by workflow administrator to make the workitem appear again in other approver's inboxes?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Donald

    Hi Donald,
    Yes this is the standard behavior of workflow.
    If you send the work item's to the multiple approver's and one approver open the work item it will disappear from all other's inbox.
    if the approver A open's the work item, then it will disappear from other's inbox. You can use the fm SAP_WAPI_FORWARD_WORKITEM to forward the work item's to the other user.
    Thanks,
    Viji.

  • How do I use infopath 2013 with visual studio 2013 to modify forms with code?

    Dear all,
    I am using sharepoint online and infopath 2013, I wonder how do I edit infopath 2013 forms with visual studio? When I try to edit form code it says  I need visual studio 2012 and some other tools, I installed them and visual studio 2013, I wonder how
    do I get rid of the message and start coding? Can someone provide a detailed procedure of doing so? I am having trouble with creating multiple items with single infopath form with repeating table on sharepoint online. Thanks.
    Timothy

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to create InfoPath form with code using Visual Studio.
    More information about develop InfoPath form with Visual Studio:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ee526362(v=office.15).aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/aa942693.aspx  
    For the second question, I suggest you can create another post , it will be easier for others to focus on one question in one thread.
    Best regards

  • Approval with completion in SRM is not working

    Hi ,
           I am not sure this is how standard built for Approval with Completion for Item Level Workflow.. Here is the scenario.. I am implementing custom BRF for Product approval ( Material Group ). My requirement is to activate 'INQUIRE' option in material group approval path..
    I have configured as follows
    Process level type 'Approval With Completion' Task id '40007952' Decision Type 'Item-Based decision for Entire document' for material group approval path.. The problem that i am facing is..say for example
    I have 4 items in a SC . First 2 items product category is 'PRO_CAT1' , remaining 2 items product category is 'PRO_CAT2'. Approver for 'PRO_CAT1' is Approver1 and PRO_CAT2 approver is Approver2.  Here is the problem when the workitem route for approval..
    all the 4 items Approve / Inquire / Reject radio Buttons are editable for Approver1 or Approver2 . Which is wrong.. Once any of the approver take the decision the work item in other approver inbox will be automatically deleted which is also wrong.
    My requirement is Approve / Inquire / Reject radio Buttons should be editable for respective approvers for their respective items.. for the above example Approver1 should be able to Approve or Inquire or Reject for first 2 items. Approver2 should be able to Approve or Inquire or Reject for remaining 2 items. But the system is behaving such a way that Approver1 and Approver2 are able to Approve or Inquire or Reject for all the 4 items.. my question is this how the Approval With Completion works for Item Level workflow?... Is Yes! then how can I implemented inquire option for item level approval?
    Thanks,
    John.

    Hi Masa,
       Thank you for this input, I am not sure whether you understand my requirement. Here is my requirement, I have to implement item based approval with inquire option. Is this possible? let us take an example.. Product category approval..If a SC has different Category then the respective category approval can only take the approve/inquire/reject for their respective item.
    I tried to use '4 "Item Based Decision for Partial Document" for Approval with completion but system through an error message said I can't use '4 "Item Based Decision for Partial Document" for Approval with completion.
    I also read the document from help.sap.com said we can only use decision type 1 and 2 for approval with completion. 
    is there a custom soluction for this requirement?
    John

  • PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

    Hi ,
    I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
    Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
    There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
    In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
    On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
    What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
    Regards,
    Sheetal

    Hi ,
    I have checked it intially and both are identical.
    Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items  ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
    So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
    But after approval it again went into error in process
    Sheetal

  • The specified user could not be found - ADFS with multiple realms

    I am using a single trusted identity token issuer (ADFS 2.0) with multiple realms for different sites (urn:sharepoint:int-site1 and urn:sharepoint:int-site2).  I added my provider to both sites through central administration and the first site works
    fine and allows my external user to authenticate.  The second site gives me an access denied page (which I expected) and asks that I request access.  When I submit the request for access I get an error message back stating "The
    specified user [email protected] could not be found".  What could I be missing?

    Hi Drew,
    According to your description. My understanding is that you encountered the error "The specified user [email protected] could not be found“ when you try to login the second site. For resolving your
    issue ,please take steps as below:
    1.Go to site settings->Site Permissions->Access Request Settings.
    2.Check  the access request send to whom, whether he approve your access request, before you logon.
    Reference:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/russmax/archive/2011/03/15/want-to-use-manage-access-requests-feature-in-sharepoint-2010.aspx
    Please inform me freely if you have any questions.
    Thanks
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Managed metadata columns in document information panel with multiple content types

    Hi everyone,
    The problem I have is that for custom content types not all managed metadata columns are displayed in Document Information Panel (DIP) for the document in the Office client application. 
    However, everything works fine with 1 specific content type. Even though the others using exactly the same site columns. The content types are deployed using visual studio to the content type hub, and after this the content types are correctly published to
    the site collections, there are no publish issues here. 
    When I create a document based on the second content type in the same library, all fields are showed in the document information panel, except the managed metadata columns.
    Detailed explanation:
    Library: procedures
    Content types:
    - simple procedure (with 4 managed metadata fields and some other text fields)
    - procedure with approval (with the same 4 managed metadata fields and some other text fields)
    Scenario 1: I add the 'simple procedure' content type to the procedures library as only content type. Everything works fine, and all fields show correctly in the document information panel in Word.
    Scenario 2: I add the 'procedure with approval' content type to the procedures library as only content type. Everything works fine, and all fields show correctly in the document information panel in Word.
    Scenario 3: I add the 'simple procedure' and 'procedure with approval' content types to the document library procedures (added simple procedure first). When I create a new document based on the 'simple procedure'
    content type, everything works fine and he shows all metadata fields. When I add a new document based on the 'procedure with approval' content type, the document information panel shows correctly, except all managed metadata fields. These are not visible at
    all. Though they worked perfectly in scenario 1 and 2.
    Is this a known issue or is there a workaround for this? 
    Thanks in advance! 
    Kind regards, Davy

    Yes!
    This problem is solved right now.
    My issue was that I'm using custom content types deployed by Visual Studio in the content type hub. To create a managed metadata site column in visual studio, you need to have first of all your managed metadata field, but also a hidden field accompagnied
    to make the actual mapping like the example below:
    <Field ID="{B654D984-187A-471B-8738-F08F3356CFDA}"
    Type="TaxonomyFieldType"
    DisplayName="Countries"
    ShowField="Term1033"
    EnforceUniqueValues="FALSE"
    Group="Demo"
    StaticName="Countries"
    Name="Countries">
    <Customization>
    <ArrayOfProperty>
    <Property>
    <Name>TextField</Name>;
    <Value xmlns:q6="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" p4:type="q6:string" xmlns:p4="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">{67308AC2-9556-456B-BF9E-43E8F23EBEE6}</Value>
    </Property>
    </ArrayOfProperty>
    </Customization>
    </Field>
    <Field Type="Note"
    DisplayName="Countries_0"
    StaticName="CountriesTaxHTField0"
    Name="CountriesTaxHTField0"
    ID="{67308AC2-9556-456B-BF9E-43E8F23EBEE6}"
    ShowInViewForms="FALSE"
    Required="FALSE"
    Hidden="TRUE"
    CanToggleHidden="TRUE"
    Group="Demo"
    RowOrdinal="0"
    />
    </Elements>
    VERY important here is that when you create your content type using visual studio, you not only have to add the managed metadata site column in your xml (which let the content type work already perfectly) but also add the hidden field to your content type
    xml !! This way, SharePoint knows that when you have multiple content types with the same site columns in the same library, the second content type also need to get the hidden field from this site columns like in the example below!
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <Elements xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/">
    <!-- Parent ContentType: Document (0x0101) -->;
    <ContentType ID="0x010100571ebc0f478a49d5a775039347ee1535"
    Name="Document Location"
    Group="Demo"
    Description="A content type containing Managed Metadata Column."
    Inherits="TRUE"
    Version="0">
    <FieldRefs>
    <FieldRef ID="{B654D984-187A-471B-8738-F08F3356CFDA}" Name="Countries"/>
    <FieldRef ID="{67308AC2-9556-456B-BF9E-43E8F23EBEE6}" Name="CountriesTaxHTField0"/>
    <FieldRef ID="{f3b0adf9-c1a2-4b02-920d-943fba4b3611}" Name="TaxCatchAll"/>
    <FieldRef ID="{8f6b6dd8-9357-4019-8172-966fcd502ed2}" Name="TaxCatchAllLabel"/>
    </FieldRefs>
    </ContentType>
    </Elements>
    I'm very happy I found this solution, because in the whole project i'm implementing, this was used a lot!
    Special thanks to the blog of @cann0nf0dder (http://cann0nf0dder.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/creating-a-site-column-with-managed-metadata) which let me think about this! 
    This ticket is answered now! :-)
    Kind regards,
    Davy

  • Work item in waiting status incase of multiple approvers

    Hi Experts,
    We have a scenrio where in the work item needs to be sent to multiple approvers.
    We have multi line container element which contains all the approvers. We have assined this container element using the expression option for the agent .
    we have made the task as general task and we do not have any requested start maintained for this work item.
    However we are facing a problem. Work item is always in waiting status. What might be the issue? In our case when i check the work flow log, for these work items there are three approvers, however SBWP inbox is appearing only for one approver and remaining two approvers do not have any Icon against their name.
    I have checked the approvers ID's and all of them are active in the system.
    Can you please help me to resolve this issue?
    Regards,
    Madhu

    Hello,
    I would look at the workitem in SWIA, proceed as if you were going to change the container elements (ie click on the workitem number, Edit > Change) and see what options are available to you.
    "Resubmit: You can have a work item resubmitted to you for processing at a later date. To do this, choose Resubmit and then enter the date on which you want to receive the work item."
    Let us know what you find.
    Edited to add: I tried it myself, a "End resubmission" button appears when you click on the Waiting step in the workflow log.
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • Multiple Approvers for Role

    Hi,
    Is it possible to have 2 approvers (primary and secondary/back-up) for a role but only one them need to approve? Both should get the email notification but only one of them should approve. Escalation to alternate approver is not what I am looking for.
    When the roles are imported into GRC, do I need to a two entries for each role since I need have 2 approvers for the role? or is Delegation a better option?
    If Delegation is used, then do I have to setup both as role owners? or can delegated user approve with the need to setup as role owner?
    Thanks,
    Jay

    Hi Jay
    You can have 2 approvers for the same roles where either of the approvers can approve the request. You need to specify 2 entries for the same role in the import file. Both approvers will receive the email notification
    A delegate dosent have to be specified as an access control role owner.
    Thanks
    Anthony

  • Shopping cart offline approval with outlook

    Dear Experts,
    Currenlt we are working on SRM 5.0 classic scenario and ECC 6.0. I want to implement shopping cart offline approval with outlook.
    Can you please guide me what all are the settings need to be done for offline approvals....
    Thanks
    Ravi

    Hi Ravi,
    The program RSWUWFMLEC was used to scehdule offline approval mails upto SRM 4.0(In SRM 5.0,report RBBP_NOTIFICATION_OFFAPP is used)..
    Please see the foll link for more deatils:
    SRM5.0:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/31/ec423b4ac8d506e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    SRM 4.0:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm2007/helpdata/en/31/47c6cb8e9249f2bc29444212e4704a/frameset.htm
    You need to check the settings mentioned in the link above before you scehdule the report for snding the approval mails to the external email ID's of the approvers.
    The job mentioned are only for sending the approval mails.To send the requester notification messages to external mail box (instead of SRM inbox),see the foll thread for more pointers:
    Re: mail refuse shopping cart
    Do let me know if you need an further help.
    BR,
    Disha.

  • Infopath form with workflow should be created in unique subsite?

    I need to create several InfoPath forms with workflows.  Should I use different subsite for each form and workflow. Or I can put them in one subsite? If I put them in one subsite, any concern of workflow interference?
    Thanks.

    You do not have to use a separate site for each form and workflow.  It can be done on the same site.  Even though you can publish multiple forms to the same InfoPath form library, I would recommend that you simply create a separate library for
    each form and workflow combination you intend to have.
    There should be no interference between the forms and workflows.
    I trust that answers your question...
    Thanks
    C
    |
    RSS |
    http://crayveon.com/blog |
    SharePoint Scripts | Twitter |
    Google+ | LinkedIn |
    Facebook | Quix Utilities for SharePoint

Maybe you are looking for

  • A suggestion to adobe photoshop

    When we handle a big picture with brush,We don't know we have modified in those places if we do not enlarge the picture.Could adobe add a new feature:when we use a key in the keyboard,photoshop can tell us where did we had handle.(the place of one st

  • ITunes upgrade and iPod syncing issues

    I opened itunes and it said there was an upgrade for it. I installed it and when I plug in my ipod, it syncs, then when I try to sync it again, it does not. on the initial opening of itunes I noticed that windows has the ipod drive listed as "G". upo

  • How to deactivate Flash on Mac?

    Are there plugins to move to deactivate flash player for Safari (assume Tiger)? Thank you, Karl

  • File extension with httpUploadForm

    Can someone tell me if it is possible to limit file upload to files with, for example, .doc extension using httpUploadForm? Is there is some userguide on this topic? I have looked into the help section of jdeveloper but it didn't help much. What are

  • BootCamp 2.0 will not partition?

    I just installed Leopard yesterday and used 2.0 to wipe the XP partition because I needed to reinstall XP. However, when I tried to run the BC Assistant to create the new partition, I get this error: Your startup disk cannot be partitioned or restore