Input SFC Data after the shop order is done

Hello,
Is there a way that I can modify or input SFC Data(SFC_DATA_ENTRY) for a finished SFC?
Thanks

Hi,
As I can see in 6.1.4.14, you can use any POD with SFC_DATA_ENTRY plugin. You can enter any operation and resource, then manually enter SFC ID and launch the plugin. So, the fact that SFC is Done does not make any difference for SFC Data Entry.
Regards,
Sergiy

Similar Messages

Scehdule Line Date getting change to future date once the Sales Order is saved

Hello Experts,
Good Morning to you all,
This is with respect to the Issue we are facing for the Orders having Product Allocation on multiple materials. Please find enclosed the detials below.
Issue : Scehdule Line Date getting change to future date once the Sales Order is saved. These Order's are having Product Allocation on multiple materials.
Description:
We have implemented Product Allocation few months back.
We have Product Allocation on multiple materials which are in demand and has been reserved for the Customers of different PA behaviors.
When we are trying to create the Sales Orders for the normal customer who is not on Product Allocation. The Order Schedule Line is getting changed to future date once the Sales Order is saved after initial creation.
These Order's are having materials of Product Allocation.
I have enclosed the sample screen shot of the error we are getting which saving the Sales Order and also the Order Schedule Line screen shot showing future date.
Error Message : There may be Product Over Allocation in Delivery Group 001.
Message No : VV023
This is a random behavior we are coming across and out of 10 Order 2 or 3 Orders is getting this Issue.
Please share your inputs how to rack this Issue.
Your suggestions will be highly appreciated.
I am unable to upload the attacments dont know what the reason.
Thanks,
Farhan.

Check whether you need to carry out the coding corrections as recommended in the following note:-
Note 52067 - Message VV023/VV024, but no prod.alloc.processing
But I wonder this is for older versions and not sure whether this would help you to overcome from the issue.
G. Lakshmipathi

Unable to change requested delivery date in the sales order at item level.

The issue is when I create order with one material (linked to network and project is created automatically in the background), I am able to change (in change mode) req delivery date for an item, but when I create order with 2 materials (linked to network and project is created automatically in the background), I can not change (in change mode) the req delivery date of any item. Req delivery date is then copied from the header req delivery date.
Is this a standard SAP functionality or a defect?

Req del date is the date requested by customer and can be changed at item level. Probably the confirmed date in the schedule line is derived from the network scheduling after ATP check. (ATP check is not activated in this case)
I am able to change the req del date at item level if there is only one item (Linked to network) and not when there are two line items (Both are linked to 2 diff networks belonging to same project)
I tried to change the date in the network, scheduled and saved but that didnt change the date in the sales order. On the contrary, if I run ATP check, netowrk dates get back to original dates derived from sales order.

In MIGO, i need to see delivery dates from the purchase order

Is there a way to see in transaction MIGO, the delivery dates from the purchase order? I hope there is some exit or BADI or BAPI or .... to perform this copy function?
We have multi-line POs for the same material with staggered delivery dates and the Warehouse needs to know which PO line to receive against.

when you enter the PO number in MIGO and hit enter, then you only get the items that can be received.
If you make sure that the PO items are created by ascending delivery date, then you can always take the first.
if you have the personal setting to display all items (even the already received ones), then you can take the first with a quantity proposal. already received items do not propose quantities.
I would ask purchasing to tell the vendor that he has to state the PO number along with the item number in all papers (delivery note, invoice).

Logic required to findout "Release To Date" of the Purchase order

Hi
We are developing a custom program to release purchase orders as per clients requirements. In that, in the output, we need to display the "Release To Date" of the purchase order. Consider the release codes are R1,R2& R3, and currently the PO is released by R1, then we need to show "Release To Date" as R1. Simillerly once R2 also released the PO, we need to show "R1 R2" in the Release To Date field. This you can see in the Release Tab of the PO.
Now we need to adopt the same logic in our custom program also. Which table i can find the release to date details. The latest release code of the PO also good enough to build the logic to findout the "Release To Date"
Any pointers would be of great help.
Thanks
Venkat.

Hi Venkat,
Check up these tables
T16FC, T16FD, T16FG, V_T16FC
Regards,
Hareesha
If it's help's reward the pts

Enable Print in IW22 after the maintanence Order is TECOed

Hi Frds,
I have a requirement to enable the print functionality (in the PM notification menu - PMNotification>Print-->Notification) for any maintanence order's notification after the maintanence order is TECOed.
Once we do TECO the notification becomes uneditable and print-->notification is disabled.
Please let me know if any user exit could be useful for this and what logic is required.
Many thanks in advance...
Regards,
Karthick C

Hi,
This can be easily achived by playing little bit with the PF Status.
In the FM : PM_SET_PF_STATUS you need to create an implicit enhancement at the end.
after checking the sy-tcode and notification status just set the standard pf status once again
only thing delete the fcode PRNT from the excluding table T_EX_FCODE[].
so your code will be
if sy-tcode = 'IW22'.
Put Logic to check notification status
delete T_EX_FCODE where fcode = 'PRNT'.
SET PF-STATUS I_STATUS EXCLUDING T_EX_FCODE OF PROGRAM 'SAPMIWO0'.
endif.
This should solve your problem.
Regards
Bikas

Delivery date on the sales order

Hi frnds
I am facing an issue here. When the sales order comes of credit hold the system proposes a new delivery date in the sales order. How can i change the settings to avoid the system from assigning weekends(Saturday & Sunday) as the delivery date????
I have checked that the factory calendar is set for weekdays only and also the propose del date is check marked in VOV8, OVX5 & OX10 have factory calendar asssigned but i am not able to figure out how to restrict the delivery date to weekdays to be proposed by the system.!!!
Am i missing something???
Will appreciate your suggestions.
null

Hi,
The fields needs to be activated in the filed group in accounting.
The path is SPRO -> Financial accouting -> Accounts Receivables and Accounts Payables -> Customer accounts -> Master data -> Preparations for creating Customer master data -> Define account groups with screen layout.
Shiva

Is it possible to maintain the last AO value after the DAQmx task is done on device DAQ USB-6341 ?

Hi all,
I use the device DAQ USB-6341 to generate the desired voltage waveform by the "finite samples" sample mode.
I notice that the channel resets to zero volts after the DAQmx task is done and the DAQ USB-6341 does not have
the property AO.idleOutputBehavior to select "Maintain Existing Value".
How can I maintain the last AO value after the DAQmx task is done on device DAQ USB-6341 ?
Thanks.
Godel

How many computers do you have in the network?
What is the IP address and default gateway number on your computer?
In order to connect to the wireless network, WVC80N should get valid IP address from the access point.
If the access point has capacity to assign a private IP address to the computers and devices then I think you can use WVC80N.

There was add one and i lost it after the update and i don't remember it's name

there was add one and i lost it after the update and i don't remember it's name
it was add-on to show me the source of any click able content
like pics on twitter or Facebook
also the videos on youtube
and it showed a little icons with small pic shape on it with different colors
and also sometimes with a small lock shape on it
now i need to know what this add -on name or how to get it back

Add-ons are not auto-deleted as far as I know...
It's possible that the extension or userscript simply doesn't work correctly in Firefox 22 due to a change in Firefox. If you look at the add-on pages, often the reviews will mention whether the add-on is broken in a new release.

Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
Hi Gurus,
I am a beginner in this area and request your help.
We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
Case 1:
1. Order Qty =100 ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
     Which means only 100 is accepted.
2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
Case 2: (The one with the problem)
1. Order Qty =100 ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
     Which means only the 100 is accepted.
2. 25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
5. The Process order allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are same .
so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Suraj

Hi Suraj,
I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI. It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly.
However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
First create a few process orders to test with.
Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using).
2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction.
Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters)
Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs.
Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using. It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP). Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
Good luck,
Mike
Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

Good Issue date in the Sales order should 1 day difference from the MBDAT

For the particular customer, i want to have difference of 1 day in between the material availability date & good issue date in the schedule line. As per standard i can't made any changes in route and shipping point. Suppose material availability date in sales order is 22.09.2010 than my good issue date should be 23.09.2010 in the sales order. Any body having any idea how can we handle this case and what are things we need consider impact of this change.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Hi,
I think you can easily enable this in Route scheduling /Delivery scheduling. You have to maintain the load time and pick/pack time as the total of 8hours. If this is done, then after material availability date, one more day will be added and the final day will be considered as GI date.
If you dont want to do this, you only have to enable this by Z by using a user exit where you can add one day to the MBDAT and update that in GI date.

BADI USER/EXIT for inserting cust. data after the Pruch. Requsitio is SAVED

Hi all,
Is there any BADI or USER EXIT available for the transaction ME51N to save
some customer data fields in a separta Z table , after the data is saved from the
Purcahse requistion .
I have used the customer exit MEREQ001 for additing the customer filelds with TABLE CONTROL.
I am not able to save the data from the table control . Any suggestion on this will be apprecitated .
Best Regards

Hi,
You have to use 'EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_003' to import data from screen to your tables and use 'EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_001' to send data to screen.use the below code like below:
EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_001:
tables : ci_ebandb.
data : i_mereq_item type mereq_item.
if im_req_item is initial.
clear: ci_ebandb.
else.
i_mereq_item = im_req_item->get_data( ).
move-corresponding i_mereq_item to ci_ebandb.
endif.
EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_003
data : i_mereq_item type mereq_item.
if not im_req_item is initial.
i_mereq_item = im_req_item->get_data( ).
move-corresponding ci_ebandb to i_mereq_item .
call method im_req_item->set_data( i_mereq_item ).
endif.
Also set the flag EX_CHANGED = 'X' to transafer the changes to database
Regards,
Himanshu

Issue with the Posting Date of the Purchase Order.

Hi All,
There are fields in BW like SSL1: Time OK, SSL2: Qty OK, SSL3: Time & Qty Ok, SSL4: Days Late (Routines are written to calculate). These fields will indicate whether the delivery against a GR is OK or not with respect to Time, Quantity and the No. of Days..
But here the issue I am facing is
If there is only1 delivery/ GR against a single item the calculation in BW are correct - i.e. for a particular PO if there is only one delivery the above fields like SSL1: Time Ok, SSL2: Qty OK will show like the delivery is done within the specified time and everything is OK (in case if it is delivered within the allotted time)
But if there are multiple deliveries or multiple GR's posted for one PO item, the calculations are going wrong i.e. even if the delivery is done well within the specified time it is showing the wrong calculations like it is delievered too late. Because in this case the earlier dates are overwritten.
Can anyone throw me some light on how can I go about solving this issue.
I am thinking of declaring the Posting Date as the KeyField of the DSO as of now it is a Data field I also want to know the impact of assigning this as a Keyfield.
Thanks in advance,
Prasapbi

Hi,
As I understand, you have a DSO based on Purchase Order and your key field is PO and its line item. The problem as you stated will always be there if you have multiple deliveries/GRs created for a single line item because the system will overwrite the entries for same key.
Problem with adding Posting date as keyfield will be that then your key will be PO-PO Lineitem-Date. When PO will be created, the Posting date will be blank(correct me here if I am wrong), therefore you will have one entry for same PO-line item combination. One without date and other with date, which again would be incorrect. If my assumption about Posting date was wrong, even then your data may not be correct because then you may have many entries with same posting date which again would overwrite each other.
If there is any direct link between PO line item and number of deliveries that will get created for them, then you can bring that field in DSO as keyfield. But I don't think there is any such field.
Looking at your report requirement, I would suggest that you make a DSO based on Goods Receipts and then calculate these keyfigures by comparing the dates between GR posting date and PO line item date.
Else you can change the way your datasource works(if its generic one based on function module). Since your main requirement is to check whether the GR posting date has met your SLA or not, you should fetch all the details only when GR is created and make your key field as PO-PO Line item-GR

How to show purchasing group members in the item data of the shopping cart?

Dear Experts,
for s shopping cart in SRM 7.0 CS, i have the following business requirement:
In the item data tab of the line item details, the drop down field for Purchasing group is there. Right to this field, there is also a link called "Show members".
If i go on this link, than a small table opens that obviously is there to contain such additional information about the purchasers like name, telephone nummber or extension.
Currently, this small table does not contain any of this additional information for any of the used purchasing groups.
Can you please help me understand, how and where i can maintain this information in the sytem, so it shows in the shopping cart?
Thank you very much for your help.

Hi,
thank you very much for the answer.
Actually, the question is not how to create the organizational unit of purchasing group in the PPOMA. This is all done. I just would like to understand, whether there is somewhere a place where i can maintain the name and maybe also the phone number of the buyer himself.
Thus, i would hope to see these details (i.e. the name and the phone number) in that small table that opens up if i click on the "Show members" link that is situated right to the purchasing group field in the "Item data" tab of the details of the line item.
Thank you.

Passing Data to the Purchase Order Style Sheet

I am new to oracle so please pardon my ignorance.
I was tasked with switching the Purchase Order from transmitting via a 3rd party application to using XML Publisher.
I was able to get the PO to generate successfully and I have made a few minor changes to the standard XSL-FO. What I would like to do is send down additional fields (messages that can be changed more easily from within the application without code changes).
We are on version 11.5.10.2. but this is a layered upgrade, so their report builder version is 6.0.8.25.0.
I think I figured out how to get the data i want to be added to the xml created by POXPRPOP.rdf.
My confusion stems from a lack of understanding of how the xml created from POXPRPOP is translated into XML Publisher.
The original report was generating the following XML before I switched the PO Output Format in Purchasing Options/Control from Text to PDF:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- 
- <POXPRPOP>
- <LIST_G_INIT_INFO>
- <G_INIT_INFO>
<MANUAL_PO_NUM_TYPE>ALPHANUMERIC</MANUAL_PO_NUM_TYPE>
<C_COMPANY></C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID></C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<BASE_CURRENCY_CODE></BASE_CURRENCY_CODE>
<STRUCTURE_ACC></STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT></STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID></C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<SHIP_VIA />
<POH_SHIP_TO_ORG></POH_SHIP_TO_ORG>
<POH_BUYER_PHONE />
<POH_VENDOR_ID></POH_VENDOR_ID>
<POH_PO_NUM></POH_PO_NUM>
<POH_REVISION_NUM></POH_REVISION_NUM>
While, the PO stylesheet appears to be expecting the following format as defined in the PO_STANDARD_PO.xml document defined in the Standard PO Data Definitions:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<PO_DATA>
<TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE>STANDARD</TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE>
<SEGMENT1>21263</SEGMENT1>
<REVISION_NUM>0</REVISION_NUM>
<PRINT_COUNT>0</PRINT_COUNT>
<CREATION_DATE>12-AUG-2004 00:08:06</CREATION_DATE>
<PRINTED_DATE/>
<REVISED_DATE/>
<START_DATE/>
<END_DATE/>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR>Terms Supplier Note</NOTE_TO_VENDOR>
<DOCUMENT_BUYER_FIRST_NAME>Pat</DOCUMENT_BUYER_FIRST_NAME>
Is the XML that was originally being generated from POXPRPOP different now that I changed the output format? If not, how is the original XML being translated to match the correct format as required by the stylesheet?
Thanks,
-Tim

Try
                            oForms.Mode = SAPbouiCOM.BoFormMode.fm_ADD_MODE
                            oForms.Items.Item("4").Enabled = True
                            oForms.Items.Item("38").Enabled = True
                            oMatrix = DirectCast(oForms.Items.Item("38").Specific, SAPbouiCOM.Matrix)
                            oMatrix.Columns.Item("1").Editable = True
                            Dim oEditText As SAPbouiCOM.EditText = DirectCast(oMatrix.Columns.Item("1").Cells.Item(i).Specific, SAPbouiCOM.EditText)
                            oEditText.Value = TempTbl1.GetValue("ItemCode", j)
                        Catch ex As Exception
                            oApplication.MessageBox(ex.Message.ToString)
                        End Try
No it coming as Not editable see the above code.
Thanks,
Ruheena

Input SFC Data after the shop order is done

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for