Inquiry about Load Balancer 440

Hi
We are planning to buy the Barracuda Load Balancer 440- BBFI440a to be used as H/W load balancer for our applications and Ftp servers. We are using oracle application server 10.1.2.0.2 and Oracle BI and windows 2003 FTP server.
My question is, does the Barracuda load balancer certified with Oracle AS 10.1.2.0.2?
Thanks

Rich,
When multiple remote addresses are defined, Coherence does randomize the address list defined in the configuration file and connect to the next address in the list.
-Luk
Edited by: lsho on Jul 19, 2012 10:56 AM

Similar Messages

About load balancing in rac

Dear Gurus
I want to ask about load balancing in RAC.
we have two nodes rac1 rac2 with physical ip as virtual ip as
rac1 rac2
physical 10.22.1.50 10.22.1.51
virtual 10.22.1.54 10.22.1.55
and two appliction servers app1 app2.Actually in tns file of app1 there is entry of virtual ip of rac1 (10.22.1.54)and in app2 virtual ip of rac2 (10.22.1.55). so we want to test whether load balancing is happening or not .like if app2 is down so whether the connection of app1 moving to rac2 also or not
so we down app2 and check.Guys tell me how could i check in that duration that whether connnection going to rac2.
i am unable to find the parameter of sessions connected in awr .Please tell how could i identify

i have stopped the IM's of one of my application server and checked the connections to my database with below query and according to it its connecting to both instances.Does it means that load balancing is happening fine.
SQL> SELECT inst_id, TO_CHAR(logon_time, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:mi:ss') "Hour when connected", count(*) "DB Sessions"
2 FROM gv$session
3 WHERE type = 'USER' and TO_CHAR(logon_time, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:mi:ss') like '%05-OCT-2011 17%'
4 GROUP BY inst_id, TO_CHAR(logon_time, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:mi:ss')
5 ORDER BY inst_id, TO_CHAR(logon_time, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:mi:ss');
INST_ID Hour when connected DB Sessions
1 05-OCT-2011 17:20:06 1
1 05-OCT-2011 17:27:18 1
2 05-OCT-2011 17:11:31 1
2 05-OCT-2011 17:26:28 2
2 05-OCT-2011 17:26:38 1
2 05-OCT-2011 17:27:18 1

Question about Load balancing with IISPROXY

          Hi,
          We are running WLS 5.1.0 SP5 on NT 4.0 SP6. We are not using clustering.
          We are able to round robin between multiple instances of the WLS successfully.
          Question: If one of the instances of WLS goes down, is there any way to configure
          the plugin to take it out of the loop automatically (without using clustering)?
          Thanks,
          Anil.


This is not the syntax. Syntax is just this:
          MaxSkips=something.
          eg: MaxSkips=25
          The doc says:
          5:10:1000 for min:default:max
          By which we mean that default value is 10, max is 1000 and min is 5. I guess the
          docs are confusing about the syntax here. We will correct them.
          --Vinod.
          Anil Kommareddi wrote:
          > Vinod,
          > I could not find any documentation on the MaxSkips parameter except in the Service Pack
          > docs. The syntax is MaxSkips=min:default:max.
          >
          > how do the min and max parameters work?
          >
          > Vinod Mehra wrote:
          >
          > > Even if the servers in the WebLogicCluster list are non clustered you WILL be
          > > able to do load balancing. But the problem is if the servers go down the plugin
          > > will not remove them. But it not that bad. If an connection attempt fails the
          > > server is marked as bad and will be skipped for the next MaxSkips (default=10)
          > > cycles of load balancing. MaxSkips parameter is configurable for IISProxy
          > > (SP4 onwards, I think).
          > >
          > > -Vinod.
          > >
          > > Prasad Peddada wrote:
          > >
          > > > I believe there won't be any load balancing unless you use servers in a cluster. As
          > > > an alternative you can use hardware load balancers directly in a situation like this.
          > > >
          > > > Anil Kommareddi wrote:
          > > >
          > > > > Hi,
          > > > >
          > > > > We are running WLS 5.1.0 SP5 on NT 4.0 SP6. We are not using clustering.
          > > > > We are able to round robin between multiple instances of the WLS successfully.
          > > > >
          > > > > Question: If one of the instances of WLS goes down, is there any way to configure
          > > > > the plugin to take it out of the loop automatically (without using clustering)?
          > > > >
          > > > > Thanks,
          > > > > Anil.
          > > >
          > > > --
          > > > Cheers
          > > >
          > > > - Prasad

Question about Load Balance SFTP service by using CSS1150X

Does anyone come across of load balancing SFTP service by using CSS1150X? Typically by configuring CSS1150X to load balance FTP service, the configuration will as follow:
content ftp_rule
vip address 192.168.3.6
protocol tcp
port 21
application ftp-control
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
group ftp_group
vip address 192.168.3.6
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
However, for my personal understanding and knowledge, I will configure my CSS1150X as follow to load balance SFTP service:
content sftp_rule
vip address 192.168.3.6
protocol tcp
port 22 //Change 21 to 22
application ftp-control
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
group sftp_group
vip address 192.168.3.6
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
My question is, "application ftp-control" in content "ftp_rule" is still applicable to SFTP or not?

I believe application ftp-control would not be used for sftp.
This might cause the session to get dropped when there is no data channel created and cause issues with long connections.
Hope it helps!!

Query about Load-Balancer 'proxy'

Hi,
When using load-balancer 'proxy', with multiple remote addresses defined, does the client randomly select the initial connection from the list of remote connections in the config file?
I know the proxy will redirect a client to a less loaded proxy, however I want to distribute the initial connection randomly. In our configuration we will have a lot of extend clients. If they all connect to the first proxy in the list, this will cause that proxy to run hot (and possibly fall over).
Hopefully I've explained that ok? It's quite a tounge-twister of technical terms. Anyhow if someone knows the answer to this I'd be grateful, as I can't find any clarification in the documentation.
Cheers
Rich

Rich,
When multiple remote addresses are defined, Coherence does randomize the address list defined in the configuration file and connect to the next address in the list.
-Luk
Edited by: lsho on Jul 19, 2012 10:56 AM

Question about load balancing between Portal and ABAP

Hi,
I have the problem whit load balancing between Portal and ECC (ERC) ABAP
Exist two system:
1) ECC (ERP) ABAP = Backend Module = HR
2) EP (JAVA) = Frontend
The users (9000 users) logon in the EP and run query (data personal) in the ECC. The problem to all user connect in Central Instance and not in the Dialog Instance.
How can balancing the conecction HTTP (EP) to ECC (ABAP)??
I need balancing in the ECC to Dialog Instance

Jco -> right. Another possibility is that you use iviews that point to the backend in this case you will need to use a load balanced entry for the backend system in the [system landscape|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/47/8c1e438d7017fce10000000a42189c/frameset.htm] -> SAP_R3_LoadBalancing
If you have ESS deployed on your portal, you will most probably need to do both.
Cheers Michael

Question about Load Balancing Wireless connections using WLC- F5- ISE

Hi all,
Can anyone give me some orientation how the radius auth process/handshake between the WLC and ISE changes once the F5 is installed in the middle in order to perform load balancing?
We can do some kind of load balancing by configuring different radius servers on each WLC for which, I must configure the same shared secret in the WLC and ISE so the radius request/accept could be processed.
Now that we have the F5 in the middle, do I need to create/configure the same shared secret in the F5 so radius transactions can be processed by this device?. Based on the following link, I must configure the F5 in the ISE like another NAD device (similar to the WLC) but I do not know if this additional configuration in the ISE includes the Auth parameter to be added in the ISE NAD (F5) configuration.
How to properly use a load balancer in Cisco's Identity Services Engine
http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/load-balancing-cisco-identity-services-engine
Our sheme is shown next,

When you covert the pair into SSO, all the APs will go to the ACTIVE unit. No unit will "live" in the standby unit because this unit will "share" the AP-support license between the two.
This is the first step you need to get sorted. Send an email to [email protected] and give them the exact details of what you want to do (i. e. AP SSO) and then provide the serial number of your nominated active WLC and the serial number of your nominated standby WLC.

Whats the best way to go about load balancing Exchange 2010 CAS

My server guys want to LB the Exchange 2010 client access servers, this will be the 7th Context on my Ace 4710.
see table for ports that are used
Port
Usage
25
smtp
80
http various
110
POP3 clients
135
RPC end point mapper
143
imap4 clients
443
SSL various
993
secure imap 4 clients
995
secure pop3 clients
6001
rpc related outlook anywhere
6002
rpc related outlook anywhere
6003
rpc related outlook anywhere
60200
rpc CAS
60201
exchange address book service
whats the best way of going about this?
do I just LB the IP addresses of the Servers and ignore the ports?
do i have to do anything special for ports 993 and 995 secure imap and pop?
I am sure there are more questions I shold be asking!

OK
so If I have a single serverfarm with all services do I filter on the virtual
address something like below?
class-map match-any EXCH_vip
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 25
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 80
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 110
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 135
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 143
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 443
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 993
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 995
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 6001
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 6002
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 6003
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 60200
match virtual-address 172.16.93.2 tcp eq 60201

2 App servers in farm will be auto failover and load balanced?

Dear all,
We are going to setup following SharePoint farm:
2 WFE
2 APP
2 OWA
2 SQL with shared NAS
We will have hardware load balance in front of 2 WFE. From my understanding, the 2 WFE will detect which APP server is available and send the request there.
Hence, if APP1 is down, all traffic come from both WFE will be directed to APP2.
But I am not so sure about the part about load balance. If all the 8 server instance are working properly, the new request come from WFE2 will be sent to APP1 or APP2? Or it depends on which service application is asking?
In addition, we planned to run all search components on APP servers. But the 2 APP servers are both 16GB memory which is lower than suggested specification. I am considering whether I can assign all the search workload on APP2 while all the other on
APP1.
Thanks.
Mark

Here is a good artcicle on how SharePoint load balances service applications:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dtaylor/archive/2011/02/23/sharepoint-2010-service-application-load-balancer.aspx
Yes you can create APP02 as search server but then service apps will not be redundant , so it would be better to run all the service apps on both the servers and if you see any memory issues, then scale it later.
As per
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/651dba4d-8751-4bd8-9492-f2842b2e1177(v=office.15)#HW_Enterprise , 16 GB is recommended for application server so i think you should be okay unless there is very high load .
Amrita Talreja

Load balancing on zones

Hi everybody,
I have question about load balancing in zones. Can we perform load balancing on zones? If so is what are the pros and con in doing that?
FYI i am asking about native zones. Any help will be greatly appreciaed.
Thanks,
John

If you are running Sun Cluster, you can set up a scalable farm of zones or application. You can also use Load Balancing features within Sun Cluster:
[http://blogs.sun.com/SC/entry/how_to_use_the_load1|http://blogs.sun.com/SC/entry/how_to_use_the_load1]

Load balancing on RMI Server Application

Hi there, I'd like to know more detail about load balancing on RMI server application, been digging the web for some time, but couldn't find much information, does anyone know any website or has the knowledge of load balancing on RMI to share? Sort like its design and implementation.
Thanks,
Jax

I want performance and fault-tolerance,
In that case, is it necessary to have a main
rmi server to allow client to access and pick one of
the rmi servers for the client?Well, if you have one main RMI server, you have a single point of failure again.. Why can't your application know about all rmi servers, and randomly choose one? If it's down, pick a different one.. If your applicatoin is an applet, you'll have to sign it.. Do that and put it on 2 redundant web servers. You have performance by splitting the load and you have your fault tolerance by having x identical rmi servers.
If you're saying what I think, why would you have one main rmi server that picks a different rmi server? That's more work AND your redundancy goes byebye, ie if your main rmi server dies..

IChat Load Balancing or failover solution?

Hello, I am working a plan to develop a iChat server. I think a Mac Mini would be a good start for a group of 50 users. The users are all over the country and my role is to unite them all in a iChat domain. I thought about building two Mac Mini servers and have them run a same domain where all users are registered in. So, we would not be impacted when one of them goes down.
Anyway, the question is how can I have a load balancing or failover solution for the iChat domain?

On the issue of load balancing, whilst I don't have any experience with macMini's, you will not need to worry about load balancing with 50 users. I'm sure you can probably put a few naughts on the end of that before you need to worry.
The design you are proposing will not work for iChat services / and for that matter most of Apple server services. For high availability services (e.g. transparent failover) I think you are going to struggle to get this working and it 'seems' Apple no longer offers guidance on this subject on 10.6.x.
You will increase availability by using an Xserve with dual PSUs and raid disks. If you are only running high availability ichat services, I would buy a pair of second hand xserves with 10.5 OS and set the ipfailover services running. Personally I would buy one and a service kit and not bother with HA - as you will find the servers are very reliable.
If you have to use mini's then just have one live and keep a near constant clone of it on another ready to manually swap out if you have a hardware failure.
Your proposed design will not work without a lot of effort non of which is supported by Apple - although it would be rewarding if you did get it working. You cannot have server to server traffic for the same domain as all your application data needs to be stored centrally. OD only provides services for authentication. The ichat server also has its own data store and this is not distributed nor can it be. It is possible to move the data store over to say an enterprise version of mysql and have that distributed.

Load balancing in Azure PaaS

Hi all,
I'm new to Azure and while our long term goal is to move our entire system into Azure, we have a small feature we'd like to try implementing first so that our infrastructure will be a sort of hybrid model for now. Basically I want to have a WebRole running
a WCF endpoint that reads and writes to a queue. One caller external to my system will call the API to drop off work. My existing system using another method in the API to query for this work that's been dropped off. Pretty simple.
My question is about load balancing. If I were using an F5 or some other hardware based load balancer I'd throw that in front of the Web Roles setup in a round robin configuration and be done with it. if I had 4 instances of the web role and my services
were polling once a second (assuming I have few instances of the polling service running in my existing infrastructure) I'd pick the work up in a second or two. This is perfectly acceptable performance for this process. However, my understanding
is Azure load balancing uses a hash algorithm that works like IP Affinity in a standard load balancer.... this won't work for obvious reasons.... what pattern should I be following for this work? Also note, I'd like to have this geo-distributed as well.
Thanks,
Matt

Hi,
Perhaps, you could use Azure Traffic Manager.
Azure Traffic Manager allows you to control the distribution of user traffic to your specified endpoints,which can include Azure cloud services, websites, and other endpoints. Traffic Manager works by applying an intelligent policy engine to Domain Name
System (DNS) queries for the domain names of your Internet resources. Your Azure cloud services or websites can be running in different datacenters across the world.
More information :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/hh744833.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn339010.aspx
http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/services/traffic-manager/
Hope this suits your needs.
Regards,
Mekh.

Interesting ACE URL Header & Load-balance & SSL on 2 VIPs

Hi There
I have an interesting situation that I am trying to solve. I have 4 websites, each one with SSL Off-Loading on the ACE on the outside. All FOUR websites run on a single server on the inside, but each website is using a different port number for differentiation. Also, they are currently only available on TWO IPs on the outside! I know.....it's a mare!
So, RSERVER = SERVER = 192.168.0.1
Each website has SSL Certs on the outside. https://website1.abc.com - https://website4.abc.com
But, DNS is only bound to 2 IPs on the outside, as that is all we have available currently, until we free up more IPs.
OUTSIDE:
website1.abc.com = 172.16.0.1:443
website2.abc.com = 172.16.0.1:443
website3.abc.com = 172.16.0.2:443
website4.abc.com = 172.16.0.2:443
On the server we have:
INSIDE: 192.168.0.1
SERVER:8001 = website1.abc.com
SERVER:8002 = website2.abc.com
SERVER:8003 = website3.abc.com
SERVER:8004 = website4.abc.com
So, in a nutshell what I need to do is:
Terminate SSL for each website, then match the HTTP header, and pass it to the SERVER on the right port. Sounds easy enough.
But, I am struggling like hell. The VIPs (Wirtual IPs on the OUTSIDE are causing me grief) My steps seem to be breaking my ruleset. Individually they all work, but once I tie them to the VIPs on the outside, it seems to stop. The first site in each CM (class-map) match in the PM (Profile-Map) works but the subsequent site just breaks.
I would post my config, but right now I have sooooooooooooo many variations, it looks like a dog's breakfast.
Can anyone give advice on the process flow to follow to get this to work. My issue is arround the VIPs mainly. To be honest, I don't really care about Load-Balancing right now. That will come later when more servers are added to mix. And then we might have to do inbound NAT too to the Server Farm, but that can wait! :-o
I have created a HEADER map for the headers, individual SERVER FARMS for each port on the RSERVER, ACLs matching the VIPs inbound on 443, CLASS-MAPs matching the HEADER and applying to SFARM, POLICY MAPS matching the CMAPs and doing Load-Balancing with SSL-PROXYs for the SSL headers. SERVICE-POLICY tieing it all together on Interface.
But .... things are going hey-wire.
So, steps are:
RSERVER
SFARMs = RSERVER:PORTs
ACLs = VIPs
CMAP = HEADER = URL
LB PMAP = HEADER CMAP & SFARM
PMAP MULITM = ACL CMAP + LB PMAP & SSL-Proxy
SVC-POL = PMAP MULTIM

Hi Surya
Thanks for the prompt reply. I'm not quite sure what you mean when you say it ca only handle 2 certs. Can you elaborate please?
It would appear to me that you can actually only bind one cert to an IP, based on using a VIP address for the server farm as per the CM in the PM. I can hack out the irrelevant bits tomorrow and post what I have done thus far. I have played with multiple lines of code and various ways of trying to do this, but the end result is that it appears once I have the CM set per VIP I can only set one SSL-Proxy, and so only one cert. If I use multiple CMs, as per the MultiMatch policy, it matches the first CM against the VIP and doesn't appear to move on as per the HTTP Header. If any of that makes sense?
regards
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

LOAD BALANCE (CSS) and Portal Port Number based on Instance Number

Hi,
My doubt is about LOAD BALANCE (CSS) and Portal Port Number based on Instance Number.
I have to install 3 servers machines and 2 servers databases cluster. There will be a HIGH AVAILABILITY environment. There will be a MIGRATION and UPGRADE.
Today there are 2 servers machines in Windows NLB. Today my production Portal is 6 6.20.
Once, I did something for LABORATORY TEST. Migration (6 6.40) and Upgrade (7.0)in two other machines. But they were with Windows NLB. When I did the installation, for each server machine and during the instalation I had to give one Instance Number for each and in result there was a different Port Number for each.
But I accessed both machines throught a virtual url(dns) with a specific port number. And it works!
NOW, with a HARDWARE LOAD BALANCE _ CSS I don't know how to do.
A guy who works with it tell us that couldn't redirect one Port Number for different port numbers. He couldn't configure the CSS like this.
My question is: Is he write? And if he is, there is a way to give the same instance number for my 3 new Portal servers machines? Example: 5(02)00.
Could you understand?
I need help.
Regards,
cheers,
Nivia

Nivia,
I have used F5 for load balancing, I am sure you can do the same with CSS. Yes, you can configure a virtual IP on the load balancer with standard ports (80 or 443) and load balancing the traffic to multiple servers with different ports. You can have different ports for each instance.
-Regards
RK

Inquiry about Load Balancer 440

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for