Inter company returns

Hello all
This is about intercompamy returns
4014 plant assined to CC 4014 returns stocks plant 1801 assined to CC 1801
The configuration is maintained properly
When the PGR is made for return delivery from plant 1801 there is no error message from the system as there is no Goods issue (MIGO) has not happened in plant 4014 (in my quality server)
Logically if you look at it when the issueing plant 4014 issues the stocks only ,then only the receiving plant 1801 can take back the stocks
The same scenario ,system was throwing error when i try to PGR  in plant 1801 as there was no MIGO happened in 4014 which was perfectly correct (in sand box)
It allows me to do PGR in 1801 only when i do or comlete  MIGO in 4014 (perfectly right)
Can anybody point out what is missing in my quality client settings which was there in sand box
Waiting for your valuable inputs
Regards
Raja
Note Even without MIGO in 4014 the stock updation is happening in both the plants 1801 and 4014 that is after PGR the stock is increased in 1801 and reduced in 4014
What setting should i need to do to ensure Goods issue is posted in 4014 before making a receipt in 1801
Any suggestions on this
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Jun 28, 2009 6:16 PM

Dear Friend
Thanks for understanding the issue
But when i checked with the delivery type NCR , system is allowing to post the PGR even without 161 return by the received plant.
This is what is happening to me too and it is wrong
But the same scenario in my sand box the system was not allowing to post PGR in the suppiled  plant which is now taking the return stocks
What is the config setting that i missed in my develpoment client?
Does in the forward process is there a check in your system to stop posting the GR by the receiving plant even though the PGI is not happened?
Answer is Yes I didnot do any settings to achieve this The system does it automatically
If you have more inputs on this issue please share
Regards
Raja

Similar Messages

  • New Post - GR not shown in inter-company return PO history

    Hi Gurus,
    Below is the process we performed for the return PO process
    1. ME21N, create the STO with the return indicator ticked.
    2. VL10B, create the delivery note for the STO created in step1.
    3. MIGO, GR against the PO created in step 1. (Mov.Type 161, not 101)
    4. VL02N, GR against the delivery note created in step2.
    All the transaction are performed successfully with the correct data flow. When we look into the PO history tab, we can see the delivery note, the material document of the Mvttype 161, but our problem is that we can NOT see the material document of the goods receipt at the original supplying plant - this is different from the regular STO (not the return scenario) in the normal process, the delivery note, PGI, PGR can all be found in the PO history.
    (Original Receiving Plant: where the PO was created,
    Original Supplying Plant: where the goods is going to received into)
    Much appreciate for any post.
    LJ
    Edited by: Jie Lin on Jul 27, 2010 11:22 AM

    Original receiving plant: where the return PO was created.
    Original supplying plant: where the goods are returned to.
    we dont have problem with Mvt.type 161. We do want the PO with the return indicator ticked to support the inter-company return process. I was referring to the GR against the PO (not the delivery, my mistake in original post) at the original receiving plant- which links to the movement type 161.
    The question we have now is that the GR against the DELIVERY at the ORIGINAL supplying plant is not shown in the PO history tab.
    Edited by: Jie Lin on Jul 27, 2010 11:06 AM

  • Inter Company Returns Process

    Hi,
    Are there any inter-company experts out there?
    I have searched the forum but cannot find consistent, conclusive answers on this subject.
    We have 2 company codes linked, one buys from the other with inter company billing via idocs - this all works very well.
    Problem now is that we would like to process some returns...and it seems that SAP just haven't provided a decent solution to this (certainly not in 4.6c)
    So far I have managed to set up the plant relationship in reverse - so that the vendor plant in effect 'buys' the goods back from the customer plant.  This works but financially isn't  100% right and requires quite a bit of master data.  Is this the recommended process?
    I would expect a process that uses a credit billing type - IG or IGA.
    Can the original sending plant process a return in the same way as it would a normal customer - then initiate an inter-company credit?
    Also I've looked at processing a returns PO - this looked promising...it does use an 'IG'  but the stock removal and stock placement in the 2 plants isn't very good ie it removes the stock from 916 and places the stock into 916 in the receiving warehouse.
    Any hints or tips gratefully received as I have spent weeks researching but to no avail.
    Regards
    Guy

    Hi,
    Thank you for your reply.
    That was an interesting note but unfortunately cannot be used (as advised in the note) in my situation.  It doesn't work where a full stock removal process is required (i.e. WM picking).
    Regards
    Guy

  • Inter company  return  PO- Error

    Hi ,
    We have intercompany purchasing process which is working fine.  But When I am  trying  to create  the  Return purchase order through   ME21N and checked the line item  box as Return  for  the same item ,u2026getting an  error message  as  follows
    ==================================================================
    u201CNo delivery type for returns processing assigned to item 00010
    Message no. ME392
    Diagnosis
    Shipping processing for a returns item is only possible if a delivery type for returns items has been defined.
    ==================================================================
    Note:   The  following config has been done u2026u2026u2026.
    1.      The  same  vendor  I,e   Intercompany vendor  created as   Return vendor
    2.     Purchase Order -
     Return vendor , I have assigned as  delivery type as   NCR to supply plant  1000( The plant from where we are getting the Material  through  Inter company  PO.)
    3.     
    Did  I miss  some config set up  or master data set up ?
    Please help  me

    You will  need to have all the settings for doing a forward PO to the returns also,if you are able to create the forward PO with your settings and able to do the delivery and PGI, these settings are suffient to do the return , with additional settings at store return with NCR as delivery type.
    but however please check the customer , and the settings at OMGN and the receiving plant customer set to be at supplying plant (normal forward PO notations).
    and please check the route id etc.
    If you are able to create a forward PO , then with NCR sctting you should get the return po too.
    please check the service market place , as there is a note for returns.
    the PO is for NB or for UB?
    Regards,

  • Inter Company Purchase Return

    Dear All,
    I am doing Inter Company Return with the help of SAP Note 489543.
    Problem:
    I have to send back the Material received thru Inter Company Purchase Order, as the Material has been rejected by the Quaity.
    I have created a Inter Company Return Purchase Order. While doing the PGI, the following error is encountered:
    >>>>>>>>
    PU Withdrawn qty exceeded by 1 PCS : 9000001230 2002 6000 200402
    Message no. M7022
    Diagnosis
    The specified stock level or quantity is exceeded by 1 PCS.
    System response
    If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
    If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
    Procedure
    In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
    In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
    Note:
    The abbreviations in the short text of this message can have the following values:
    BA = batch
    OR = order
    PL = plant
    PR = previous period
    PU = purchasing document
    RE = reservation
    SL = storage location
    VC = consignment stock from vendor in storage location
    >>>>>>>>
    Would request to look into it & revert me back.
    Regards,
    P K Karn

    Hi,
    you are sending STO from plant 2600 to 1600 for 1000 nos  by MOV 351
    You have to receive for 1000 nos in plant 1600 by  movement 101. and  again raise a STO to plant 2600
    You can return the  material  from  1600 to 2600 say 200 nos by a New STO
    This is the procedure.
    I think you cannot send partial return in STO .
    You have to inward fully and return the material
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • GR not shown in inter-co return PO history

    Hi Gurus,
    Below is the process we performed for the return PO process
    1. ME21N, create the STO with the return indicator ticked.
    2. VL10B, create the delivery note for the STO created in step1.
    3. VL02N, PGI against the delivery note created in step 2.
    4. MIGO, GR against the delivery note created in step2.
    All the transaction are performed successfully with the correct data flow. When we look into the PO history tab, we can see the delivery note, the material document of the PGI (Mvttype 161), but our problem is that we can NOT see the material document of the goods receipt - this is different from the regular STO (not the return scenario) in the normal process, the delivery note, PGI, PGR can all be found in the PO history.
    Much appreciate for any post.
    LJ

    Original receiving plant: where the return PO was created.
    Original supplying plant: where the goods are returned to.
    we dont have problem with Mvt.type 161. We do want the PO with the return indicator ticked to support the inter-company return process. I was referring to the GR against the PO (not the delivery, my mistake in original post) at the original receiving plant- which links to the movement type 161.
    The question we have now is that the GR against the DELIVERY at the ORIGINAL supplying plant is not shown in the PO history tab.
    Edited by: Jie Lin on Jul 27, 2010 11:06 AM

  • Material returns in case of Inter company stock transfer

    Hello,
    In the inter company stock transfer, when material is  recived in the receving company code, it will get rejected in the quality check. what is process in the SAP to return back material to  supplying company code.
    Regards
    Manish

    Hi Manish,
    Here's the process (generally)
    1. (At Recv Plant)
    EITHER:   
             1- a) Create a Return Delivery w.r.t. the Material Doc that Goods were received (Opens the Order qty in PO) and do the PGI (Dlv Ty RLL)
    OR
             1-b) Create a Return PO (with Return Ind) and Return Delivery (does not open PO qty) and do PGI (Dlv Ty NCR)
    2. (At Supp Plant)
        Create Returns Order in SD and Returns Delivery (Dlv Ty LR) and do PGR
    NOTE: The Supp Plant must have a Vendor Master (maintained at CC level) assigned. And the Recv Plant must have Customer master and other Shipping data (SOrg, Ds Ch, Div) maintained.
    After the postings AP and AR accounts are updated to reflect the postings in each CoCd. Verify this in the Accouting Document created as a result of PGI and PGR.
    Let me know this helped.
    Regards,
    -Mewan

  • Return of consignment using inter-company vendor

    Hi All,
    I need some help regarding consignment return in retail using inter-company vendor.
    I'm using item category NKN for fill-up and NKR for pick-up with movement type 635 & 636.
    The fill up process goes well, we can create the DO fill up using inter-company PO in VL10D.
    But when i try to do return from store to inter-company DC the shipping tabulation in the PO is missing. So i can't generate the DO pick-up because of that.
    Best Regards,
    Leo

    Hi madhu,
          OBYA - i already settings for inter company code postings. I already made that and make posting also.
    Now the problem, i transfered open item of vendor(1) of 100(Dr) from sender company code(1234) to receiver company code(ABCD) to the vendor(2) 100(Dr).
       when i did this transfer sender company open item nulified and the same open item transfer to the receiver company code with open item status.
       Now i book one bill on vendor(2) receiver company code (ABCD) for 100(Cr). Now when i am clearing debit amount with credit amount through F-44 system generating a message that "open item not found"
       i choose document number in additional selections.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Inter company Stock Return

    Hi Gurus,
    In our inter company scenario we send stock from 2600 to 1600. So when we create outbound delivery in 2600 it goes into transit from there 1600 receives.
    Now when we do migo with 122 for partial quantity in 1600 it creates material document and sends the stock to transit. Which we can receive back on PO in 1600. But there is no way to take back into 2600.
    So I think when we do vendor return for partial quantity in 1600, it should create outbound delivery that can be received into 2600. But I don't know.
    Can anyone give me the solution?
    Thanks in advance
    RajaRam

    Hi,
    you are sending STO from plant 2600 to 1600 for 1000 nos  by MOV 351
    You have to receive for 1000 nos in plant 1600 by  movement 101. and  again raise a STO to plant 2600
    You can return the  material  from  1600 to 2600 say 200 nos by a New STO
    This is the procedure.
    I think you cannot send partial return in STO .
    You have to inward fully and return the material
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Credit memo for Inter-company billing

    Hi
    We are trying to create a credit memo with reference to an inter company billing document. The business requirement is to create a credit memo  to adjust the invoice value due to wrong value posted in the original inter-company invoice. Hence we do not want to use the sales returns route for this.
    So, we are trying to create a credit memo request (ZCR) in VA01 with reference to the Inter company billing document (ZIV). We have maintained the copy control between ZCR and ZIV.
    However, when creating a credit memo request (ZCR) with respect to the intercompany billing document, we get the below error in the sales order.
    "Item category ZNLC is not defined" and "Check Item copy" with Message No: V1324.
    ZNLC is the item category that we used in the intercompany delivery document.
    We are able to ignore this message in sales order screen and save the credit memo request in VA01 and also create credit memo (ZG2) in VF01.
    Pl provide your inputs on whether we are missing any other configuration.
    Regards,
    John

    Hi
    I have maintained the item level copy control settings as below.
    In the copy control (VTAF) between ZCR (Credit memo request) and ZIV (Inter company billing) at the item level for ZNLC (Inter company item category coming source document), the following setup has been maintained
    Copying requirements : 303
    Copy schedule lines : Blank
    Pos / neg qty : Blank
    Pricing type : D
    Update doc flow : X
    Do not copy batch : blank
    Pl let me know if there are any other settings to be done in config.
    Thanks,
    John

  • Order related inter company credit memo - Order status 'Not Invoiced'

    Hi,
    We have recently created 'Order related inter company credit memo' process for return Stock Transport Orders(STO). For this, we used order related billing (billing relevance = C i.e. Relevant for ord.-related billing - status acc.to target qty) with standard item category 'G2N'. The issue is even after invoicing, sales order item status is 'Not Invoiced' and header status is 'Open', hence these orders are picked up multiple times during background invoice run and multiple invoices are being created.
    How do we control the 'Completion' status in order related inter company billing? VBUP-FKSAA is not changed even after billing document creation and remains as A i.e. Not yet processed. Do i need to check VBUP-FKIVP since this is inter company billing.
    I have also tried with TVAP-FKREL as 'B' i.e. Relevant for order-related billing - status according to order quantity but of no use.
    Please advise.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ganesh
    Edited by: Venkata Ganesh Perumalla on Nov 10, 2010 6:08 PM

    HI,
    Check too the Note 308989 - Consultant note for cross-company transactions
    It says:
    I.1.5 Returns request (IR) - returns delivery - customers credit memo -
    intercompany credit memo (IG) (RETURNS)
    The customer credit memo is created for the returns request and the
    intercompany credit memo is created for the returns delivery.
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Inter Company Credit Memo (Internal Credit Memo)

    Hi,
    I have searched the forum using: 'Inter Company Credit' ' Internal Credit Memo' and 'IG'.
    Found some information but still do not have full picture.
    We use an inter company process - similar to cross company selling - where company code A supplies company code B via an inter company PO.  Company code A then bills company code B using the standard inter co billing type (IV), this has output RD04 set up which makes the posting via an idoc into the receiving company code's financials.
    This all works very well.
    Although we are now at the stage where we need to issue internal credits ie company code A credits company code B - for example goods did not arrive.
    Seems that this is a real grey area - searched everywhere - internet, SAP, books etc.  I have not found any comprehensive information ie full process and configuration required.
    I have learnt that all inter-company billing must be in relation to a delivery - is this correct?
    I have 2 scenarios:
      1.  Goods are returned back to the supplying company code, so therefore need to to raise an internal credit memo.
    Can returns order RE be used for this, using company code's B internal customer number as the account number?  RE is set up with the inter-company billing type IG, so this would bring the stock back on hand into company code A.
    The credit would then be processed against the rtns delivery (LR) but how would billing know which billing type to use, in other words does billing know that we are trying to process an inter company transaction?
      2.  Goods are not returned - just wish to process a credit.
    As a delivery document is required, we still need a delivery to be created in this process.
    I have found SAP note 24756 which explains the set up  of new order type, doc flow, item cat etc -  I think this is all required so that the returns delivery used is just a dummy delivery therefore not relevant to warehouse / PGI.  Is this set up still required?
    Does anyone out there have any experience in this area?  I think there is a real lack of knowledge in this area......I'm really struggling!!!!!
    Incidentally we require the credit to be processed via idocs same as normal billing.
    We are on 4.6C.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Guy

    Unfortunately, I don't have enough experience with intercompany billing to consult you on these questions. Also I've never worked with a release older than 4.7.
    You might want to read [SAP Help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/dd/5614e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm] and request your manager to get a consultant specifically with the intercompany experience for a few days.
    When posting on SDN, I'd recommend to ask only specific questions when you run into an issue (after you've done research and tried to resolve it yourself, of course). Large "blanket" posts rarely get any response here (and for a good reason).
    I'm guessing that your sales org. error is because one of these prerequisites is missing:
    - Permissible combinations of plant and sales organization must be defined
    - Sales area data (sales organization, distribution channel, and division) must be assigned to each plant that participates in intercompany sales processing
    This is mentioned in SAP Help (see link above).
    Good luck!
    Update - additional reference materials:
    [How to configure Inter Company Billing|http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sd/configuring-intercompany-billing.htm]
    [SD Book on Google (fragment)|http://books.google.com/books?id=GzH8bvbV6RAC&pg=PA277&lpg=PA277&dq=SAPintercompanybilling&source=web&ots=5CB4kVqJR_&sig=C_tGc5EmJg3AMZhhs83700WGU5U&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result#PPA276,M1]
    Edited by: Jelena Perfiljeva on Jan 14, 2009 9:20 AM

  • PO Number Check on an Inter-Company Consignment Fill-up Order

    Hi Gurus,
    I am working on an Inter-Company Consignment Fillup Scenario. When i create an order in CRM the order is error free. Upon replication i get an error. The error message is
    Purchase order "TEST PO" does not exist in the system (see long text) (Notification E V1 583) - TEST PO is the PO entered.
    The requirement is to enter any PO and ECC should not check if a Purchase Order exists for the PO entered in ECC.
    This was working before we applied support packs in our environment 10 days back.
    Well we do not create orders in ECC, if i try to create one in ECC the error is
    Purchase order Test PO does not exist in the system
    Message no. V1583
    Diagnosis
    You are creating an order for a consolidated company and must eliminate internal business volume. For this reason, the system tries to determine if the related purchase order exists. This is not the case, however.
    Procedure
    Enter the relevant purchase order number
    Thanks,
    Kiran AV

    <b>Consignment Cycle:</b>
    1. Consignment fill up:
    Sales document type is KB
    Item category KBN
    schedule line category 1
    In this step, you are not invoicing the customer. document flow is sales order -
    delivery item category. It will not be relevant for billing and pricing because you are not charging money for these goods in this step.
    In schedule line category, you will set movement type 631 & set for availability check and TOR.
    2. Consignment Issue.
    Once the customer informed you that he used all the goods or partial goods then you will create consignment issue for used goods.
    Sales document: KE
    Item category: KEN
    schedule line category: C0 or C1
    Here you are invoicing the customer(because he used the goods). you are assigning the delivery document and billing document to the sales document.
    In item category, you are setting relevant for billing, pricing, special stock.
    In schedule line category, your setting is 633 movement type, relevant for availability check & TOR.
    3. Consignment Return:
    Customer found that some goods are damaged or he not able to sold the goods he want to send it back. that you are creating this document.
    Sales document type: KR
    Item category: KRN
    You will assign delivery document and billing to sales document. you will create return order, return delivery, return billing.
    Your setting item category relevant for billing, returns, pricing, special stock.
    Your setting schedule line item category: 634 movement type, NO availability NO TOR.
    4. Consignment Pick up:
    Even if you create the consignment return the goods are not come to direct to your plant. For that you need to create consignment pick up. here the owner ship is not changing so you do not need to create billing.
    Assign return delivery to sales document type.
    Sales document: KA
    Item category: KAN
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka

  • Inter Company Billing process

    Hi,
    We are testing the Inter Company Billing process.
    Please clarify the below my doubts: what are we doing in these below two transactions? and what kind of documents will get created after executing both the transactions?
    1) /N/DSD/DE_ENTRY
    2) /DSD/SL_COCKPIT
    I am FI Consultant, so not able to understand clearly the above transactions.
    Please explain in detail.
    Regards,
    Vidya

    Dear Vidya,
    The transactions which you have mentioned are not related to intercompany billing process. as suggested by our friend above.
    I will try to elaborate the use of the metioned transactions. These both transactions are used in case of direct store delivery componant, and are based on the tour data.
    1) /N/DSD/DE_ENTRY :
    Generally in direct store delivery process, material is loaded on the trucks and check out from warehouse is done, this material is delivered by driver to several customers on his way and he also collects cash payments, cheques form several customers. he can also pick up empties from the customers and then he comes back to the warehouse with empties and payments. where check in is done.and all data is entered regarding empties and payments.
    Now whtever he has delivered and brought back has to be entered in the system, which is nothing but tour data entry which is above transaction.
    2) /DSD/SL_COCKPIT
    Based on the tour data entered the system will carry out the settlement. and for the settlement you need to use above transaction.
    here you will enter the data in check in and check out as tour entry.
    then system will compare  the data and creates different kinds of documents like
    debit memo's to customer , credit memo's in customer incase some returns, empties credit memo, billing documents against received payments, and most importantaly credit or debit memo against driver if empties quanity differs from wht is signed by customer.
    I hope this gives you some insight of these transactions and helps to clear your doubt. But there is more which you can read about it.
    Regards,
    Paresh

  • Inter company crdit memo

    hi, plz guide me about inter company credit memo and third party returns?

    Unfortunately, I don't have enough experience with intercompany billing to consult you on these questions. Also I've never worked with a release older than 4.7.
    You might want to read [SAP Help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/dd/5614e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm] and request your manager to get a consultant specifically with the intercompany experience for a few days.
    When posting on SDN, I'd recommend to ask only specific questions when you run into an issue (after you've done research and tried to resolve it yourself, of course). Large "blanket" posts rarely get any response here (and for a good reason).
    I'm guessing that your sales org. error is because one of these prerequisites is missing:
    - Permissible combinations of plant and sales organization must be defined
    - Sales area data (sales organization, distribution channel, and division) must be assigned to each plant that participates in intercompany sales processing
    This is mentioned in SAP Help (see link above).
    Good luck!
    Update - additional reference materials:
    [How to configure Inter Company Billing|http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sd/configuring-intercompany-billing.htm]
    [SD Book on Google (fragment)|http://books.google.com/books?id=GzH8bvbV6RAC&pg=PA277&lpg=PA277&dq=SAPintercompanybilling&source=web&ots=5CB4kVqJR_&sig=C_tGc5EmJg3AMZhhs83700WGU5U&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result#PPA276,M1]
    Edited by: Jelena Perfiljeva on Jan 14, 2009 9:20 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to connect two i phone 4 g to one itunes on one pc ?

    Am new to i phone, have a pc (WINDOWS xp) which has i tunes downloaded and synced with one i phone , how can i use the same pc for my new i phone. Please guide. Don't want to create any issues with the existing i phone that has been using the itunes

  • Scanning problem with HP Deskjet 3050A - only scans about a quarter of the page

    My HP Deskjet 3050A wirelessly prints just fine with my Mac Lion OS 10.7.3. But whenever I scan something, the resulting scan captures only about a quarter of the page, which is blown up in size to take up the entire page. (And I'm scanning regular 8

  • Macbook Pro won't connect via DVI

    Hello all, My Macbook Pro suddenly won't connect to any monitor using a DVI connection. If I use a VGA monitor (via my DVI to VGA connector), everything is dandy, but connecting directly to a (i.e.) Samsung or an Apple Monitor via DVI, the OS just bl

  • How to reset Pen tool or changing it back to normal? (Adobe AI)

    Hello everybody. I'm having a problem with the Pen tool in Adobe Illustrator and I don't know exactly how to reset it or make it function like the Pen tool in Adobe Photoshop. As you can see below, when I'm trying to draw the shadows of face, hair an

  • 3.3 RC - need camera profile for Nikon D7000?

    I'm kind of a knucklehead about Adobe so please be patient with me.... I have a Nikon D7000 (not a D700).  Downloaded 3.3 RC and can edit my RAW pics - works for me. But there are no profiles in the camera calibration.  What am I missing ?  Is it a C