Intercompany Transactions code

can any body give me intercompany Transactions code for all accounting entries

Hello,
code to set up cross company code configuraiton is OBYA.
Enter Company Code 1 and Company Code 2.
Enter Posting Key and GL Acct in Company Code 2 for Posting Made in Company Code 1 and to be cleared in Company Code 2 (for both payables and receivables).
Enter similar configuraiton for for Posting Made in Company Code 2 and to be cleared in Company Code 1.
Cross Company Code Transactions
A cross company code transaction involves 2 or more company codes in one business transaction. For a cross company code transaction, the system will post a separate document in each of the company codes involved.
Examples for cross company code transactions are:
u2022One company code makes purchases for other company codes (Central Procurement)
u2022One company code pays for other company codes (Central Payment)
u2022One company code sells goods to other company code
Steps:
u2022Create Clearing Accounts in each of the company codes.
The Clearing Accounts may be GL Accounts, Customer or Vendor Accounts.
u2022Configure the Automatic Postings for Cross Company Code Transactions by assigning Clearing Accounts for both the company codes.
Creation of Clearing Accounts in both the Company Codes (FS00)
Regards
Ravi

Similar Messages

  • What transaction code and entrys we use to post intercompany transactions

    hi,
    I know obya is used to configure intercompany.
    1.can you explain what accounting entrys we post.example?
    2.what tcode we use to post the intercompany transaction
    3.please any relevant documents can email to [email protected]
    thanks
    Kiranmayi

    we have 2 theories after showing the exception trace to folks who r more adept at managed code.
    the first is related to the fact that our 3rd party dlls (I think entity framework is included in these) r older versions.  I don't want to discount this theory but we have some evidence already that this might not be true.
    I hope I can do justice to the 2nd theory but will make it clearer and clearer as I get a better understanding.  I believe this is what Arthur was saying and I applaud his instincts.  They explained that .net is so "smart" that it detected
    a change in namespace  (ie context as Arthur said) and purposely threw an exception 2 save us from ourselves.  The workarounds discussed were a bit over my head but I will continue trying to better understand it.  The fact that many of the methods
    we call after reflection r now merged into one assembly seemed relevant to the discussion and possible workarounds.   
    this link came up in their discussion and I believe the bottom line here is that by qualifying assembly names further (in config?)r, a workaround is possible. 
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.type.assemblyqualifiedname(v=vs.110).aspx  .
    This link came up as well and has something to do with ILMerge and workarounds to ILMerge. 
    http://elegantcode.com/2011/04/02/dynamically-load-embedded-assemblies-because-ilmerge-appeared-to-be-out/  .
    Finally, this link came up and seems to have something to do with embedding your dlls in one assembly without them losing their identity.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2010/02/03/jeffrey-richter-excerpt-2-from-clr-via-c-third-edition.aspx
    I'll post more here as we muddle thru this.

  • Intercompany transactions with more than two company codes

    Hi fellow members,
    We have a requirement for intercompany transactions with more than 2 company codes. The sales order is booked in company code A and goods are despatched from plant that belongs to company code B. However, we need the inter-company invoice to be posted between company code B and an intermediary company code C. The second inter-company invoice is to be posted between company code C and company code A.
    There could be more than one intermediary involved based on the company code in which the sales order is booked and the company code of the delivering plant. Would appreciate inputs from the forum of how this could be achieved in ECC.
    Appreciate your help
    Regards
    Rohit Zalani

    Hi Rohit,
    Two scenario require as per your requirement.
    Inter company Sale between A TO B .
    Cross Company stock transfer between B  to C.
    Sunil

  • Mapping of Intercompany transaction between SRM & SAP R/3

    Hi SRM gurus,
    We have a scenario where the client wants intercompany transactions to be mapped between SRM & R/3.
    i) they say according  to interco transactions, using SRM PO, the following journal entry will be posted upon GRN:
                        Dr           Expense
                             Cr          A/P to Co Code 1 for SRM Vendor code
    Question : if co code 1 recognizes A/R in Intercompany code, can we match the balance i.e : is it possible to recognize "A/P to Co Code 1 for SRM Vendor code" as Intercompany balance
    ii) When Co. 1 pays for pdts / services on behalf of Co. 2, an intercompany, the journal entry will be as follows :
    Co. 1 : Payment voucher (FB60)
    a) on GRN :
                        Dr   Prepaid promotion
                              Cr    GR/IR Clearing
    b) on IR :
                        Dr    GR/IR Clearing
                              Cr    A/P to Vendor
    Co. 1 : Journal Entry (FB70)
    Charge to Co. 2
                        Dr. A/R from Co. 2
                              Cr.  Prepaid Promotion
    Co. 2 : Journal Entry (MIRO)
    On Invoice Recipt to Co. 1
                        Dr. Expense
                              Cr. A/P to Co. 1
    Is it possible to make a set of journal entries as below by make config changes in SAP R/3 :
    Co.2 :
    Upon GRN : Dr Expense
                           Cr GR/IR Clearing
    Upon IR :   Dr GR/IR Clearing
                           Cr A/P to Co.1
    Co.1:
    Upon IR :   Dr. from Co. 2
                           Cr. A/P to Vendor
    The client wants to track the above postings scenario through old vendor code which is used as SRM vendor code and which is same as maintained in R/3 vendor master "Previous acct. no." field in Accounting view. To me the above entry on IR in R/3 is not at all feasible.
    Like to have your expert suggestions on the above scenario how to map b/w SRM & SAP R/3.
    Rgds,
    Samik

    Hi. What exactly are you looking for with the vendor material number? Note 444976 and 412817 are about it not transferring, butthey are very old, you have not said what version of SRM you are using.
    For the goods receipt, I doubt there will be a note to let you set the posting date or document date in the backend based on approval date, but you can easily use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI method BBP_CONF_CHANGE to set this date to whetever you want.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Intercompany transaction does not exists

    Hi,
    I am have posted entry in F-02 and also i have asigned a new company code to the transaction and also document got created.
    now i need to reverse the document for the reversal reason 1 in T.Code FBU8.
    I am getting error message " Intercompany Transaction does not exists".
    Please help me with this issue.

    dear
    check settings in OBYA. is clearing account configured for intercompany postings
    and check that in OBA7 for the document type you using allow intercompany postings.
    regards
    rohit
    Edited by: ROHITBALI on Nov 19, 2011 7:28 AM

  • Intercompany Transaction Error

    Hi
    I'm currently having an issue doing intercompany transaction
    In FB50 the following transaction have been made
    8xxxxxx DR 10000 ( Cocode 1000) with tax type A0
    6xxxxxx CR 10000 ( Cocode 2000) with tax type V0
    When i try to simulate it gave me an error saying Trading partner in account xxxxxx cocode 1000 not valid.
    I have setup the vendor/customer master data and have input the trading partner field
    I used OBYA to setup the intercompany clearing account
    I have used OB28 to setup the proper validation
    Is there any steps i missed or have not done? or anything i should check?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi...
    As per your issue
    Trading partner must be the same in the both case (for both the company codes)..than only you can able to process.
    I think in your case the company (trading partner) may be different  for both the company codes
    Please check and confirm
    Regards
    vamsi

  • Intercompany Transactions Configuration

    I have a question about configuration for intercompany transactions.
    OBYA does not work in Europe because each company code in our case is separate legal entity and in Europe to be able to make intercompany entry you need to have billing document and there are VAT implications as well.
    SO OBYA is not an answer.
    Does somebody know what needs to be configured in SD (AR side ) and MM (AP side) and FI ( )so when intercompany transactions are created, they can be automatically billed and created automatically entries (with VAT) on both sides in bot involved company codes for AP and AR?
    To make my question more clear I give example of scenario:
    Selling organization one country (egz Spain) company code 0341, customer in Portugal (ship to  and Bill to Portugal) delivery from warehouse in Germany company code 0491
    So I have 2 documents created
    1. Sales invoice from selling organization in Spain to Customer  in PT.
    2. Intercompany billing from Germany to Spain
    What I found out so far is that AR is not complicated but AP side requires kind of EDI configuration.
    I would very much appreciate answer on my question.

    Hi Edyta,
    I came across such scenario in my last project.
    You can meet your requreiment via IDOC functionality. Being from FI, I just testing wrt tax codes. While testing, billing was done in Germany, later accounting entry is automatically posted in Spain.
    Please check on IDOCs functionality.
    I would try to share more information in m ynext reply.
    Kind regards,
    Dinesh Lakhotiya
    IGATE - FICO Consultant

  • OBYA - Intercompany transactions

    Hi,
    I would like to better understand the scenarios where the clearing accounts in transaction "BUV" (Tcode OBYA) should be set as GL postings and vendor postings.
    I am very familiar with settings in OBYA as Dr (40) & Cr (50) of GL accounts. When an intercompany transaction is posted, the system uses the clearing account specified here for the missing leg in each of the CoCodes.
    The above set up would also work if the paying company code is different in AP. I understand that trading partner fields can also be populated with the above setting.
    I am not clear on scenarios where the interco clearing accounts are specified as vendor accounts. Any information that would help me to better understand this would be great.
    Thanks,
    SD.

    Great question!  I think you define intercompany customers/vendors in OBYA, as opposed to clearing GL accounts, when several entities under one umbrella have contracts between them in such a way that they need to generate intercompany receivables/payables when they transact with each other.  Meaning, the need to generate sub-ledger entries.  If there is no such need, you just assign a clearing GL account in OBYA.  At a consolidated level (when you add up the numbers of all entities at the corporate level for external reporting purposes), the balance in clearing account should automatically net to zero.

  • Tax on intercompany transactions

    Hi gurus,
    when we do the intercompany transactions  for a free of charge invoices, SAP still incorporate Tax on the invoice. AP didn't want to see the tax on these free of charge invoices. we are using Taxware as our third party Tax software, any help to resolve this issue will be really appreciated. Points will be awarded.
    Thank you
    Priti

    To keep it simple, you should create a new Tax Code for  Tax Code for Intercompany Transactions (if you have anything already where the tax will be 0, you can use that also).
    The T Code to use it is FTXP.
    The Tax percentage rates for the 2 condition types XP1I and XP2I need to be Zero ( considering this tax code will be used by AP process) - If it's by AR process, the condition types that need to be zero are XR1I and XR2I.
    Hope that helps..
    Thanks,
    Nandita

  • Posting Through Transaction Code F-53

    Hi Friends,
    I am facing problem when using transaction code F-53
    It's an intercompany posting.
    Without Selecting the Vendor Account it's been posted to GL Account of Investement with Bank 
    Nature of Transaction is Shares Purchase from Intercompany.
    Error: In GL Account INvestement (Validation Error Message: Trading Partner is Required Field)
    I know as per logic of F-53, we need to select the open items from Vendor account and post the entry. But in this case is there any option of using same Transaction code F-53 without doing so. "It is user requirement"
    I have suggested to use F-02 instead of F-053.
    Expecting your Suggestions. Need Clarifition please let me know.
    Regards,
    vivek

    hi
    Hi,
    you have a 2nd or 3rd local currency defined in FI, but you have not defined an appropriate parallel depreciation area for your periodic posting area. This is possible, but in principle I always strongly recommend to use parallel depreciation areas.
    This means now that the periodic posting run will translate the posting amount into your 2nd/3rd local currency. And this in combination with some other issues can cause your problem. For instance individual posting line item schemes used, wrong G/L accounts stored in the account determination. There can be some reasons, so to solve your problem you must check your individual system. It is hard to say without having seen your configuration to provide you the reason.
    Regards,
    santhosh

  • Intercompany Transactions in CO

    Dear Experts,
    i have one clarification for the intercompany transactions in the controlling module.
    Actually we have created one controlling area and many company codes for multiple countries which belongs to the controlling area.we have  taxation rule in some countries so we want to deactivate the intercompany transactions in the company codes which have a taxation rules.please be noted that the authorization object is the controlling area in our CO module.
    could you tell me what will be the best approach ?
    Thanks

    You can do that with a controlling validation (call up point = 2, Internal CO Posting: Send/Rec Val), checking COBL_RECEIVER-BUKRS and COBL_SENDER-BUKRS.
    Paolo

  • Need Help on Intercompany transactions

    Hi Peers ,
    I am a beginner in HFM , I got some doubts in IC module
    Can someone explain real-time scenario of IC in a Company ?
    How do we achieve eliminations ?
    Im aware of metadata settings , Flagging accounts , Entities as IsICP . and Defining a plug account for the account, usage of reason codes
    But what bugs me is Auto Match , Manual Match , Match By Transaction ID , Match By ID .
    Please help me out
    - Regards

    There is a difference between what we call the IC or ICP (Intercompany Balances) features, and what we call the ICT module (intercompany Transactions).
    You can enter Intercompany Balances as normal data between a source entity and a partner using the ICP dimension (one of the 12 standard dimensions) and you can run Intercompany Matching system reports to analyse the matching balances and check for mismatched balances. The consolidation process performs the Intercompany Eliminations (using the Proportion and Elimination value members and plug accounts) as documented in the HFM documentation. But obviously a balance data point is only the total for all the similar transactions between two partners in a whole base period i.e. the aggregation of everything that happened in that account between those partners in a particular month.
    But some companies wanted to go deeper than that, and input individual transactions into HFM, and be able to do matching/mismatching analysis at the base transaction level. So an additional set of features was added to HFM which became known as the ICT module. This is where users can load transaction files (.trn files) from a source system into the ICT module, perform the automatching by transaction ID / by account and manual matching right there in the ICT module, analyze the mismatched transactions and make corrections etc, before the data ever hits the main HFM balances for the whole period. You can load hundreds or thousands of transactions for a particular period, filter by matched/mismatched until you are satisfied, then when everything is matched, transactions can be individually or bulk selected and "Posted" into the main HFM database (total balance for the whole base period) from the ICT module and then consolidated.
    This is all explained in more detail in the HFM documentation. But that is the theory behind it. It is recommended you study the documentation and attend the Oracle University "Create and Manage Applications" training course.

  • Ebtax for Intercompany Transactions

    Gurus ,
    We have a requirement by our business where they want to automatically calculate the tax for intercompany transactions in Payables. In todays world , they are manually selecting tax classification code and business category to calculate tax in AP. On AR side we are using sabrix and on AP side we are using EBtax. Has anyone faced such implementation ? Does anybody know how to configure ebtax so that for intercompany transaction tax is automatically calculated while importing transaction in AP.
    Please help !!
    Thanks
    Kate

    Hi Kate,
    We had a very similar situation with only difference being Taxware in place of Sabrix.
    If you do not have any bolt on for tax, and use AGIS for intercompany transactions, the AR taxes will be copied to AP automatically and taxes will be same in AP as well as AR.
    However, if a bolt on is being used, Sabrix in your case, the AR taxes are not copied over to AP by Oracle.
    Either you can get a small customization done with all AR taxes getting copied and inserted into AP interface tables or you can get all the taxes in AR to default to zero amount in Sabrix.
    (we could get the second option done as all intercompany transactions were settlements and tax could be brought to zero amounts).
    Regards,
    Abhi

  • Error in transaction code MB01

    Hi,
    While doing th goods receipt for a Purchase order in MB01 transaction code ,  I am getting error message as "Inconsistency between a document field and profitability segment number "
    Here account assignment category of PO is - All aux.acct.assgts.
             Item category is : Third party.
    Please help me in this issue.
    Thanks,
    Usha.

    Hi Can you please explain me how to check this inconsistency for G/L account.
    I found the G/L account for that perticular company code and valuation area.
    Please explain me .
    Thanks ,
    Usha.

  • Creation of Transaction code for Reports created in FGI1.

    Hi all,
       We are in ECC 6.0 version. We have created one report for Profit Center Group Wise Receivables with transaction code FGI1. When we executed the report from FGI5 , it was showing the values correctly.
       We created the t.code for the report painter programe and tried to execute. The screen is different from that of T.Code: FGI4.  When we executed , it was not showing any values. I created authorisation for the report and also for the transaction codes.
       Appreciate your suggestion at the earliest.
    Thanks
    Dasa

    Hi
    Check TSTCP table  for the existing t-codes and for creating check this link
    Re: Transaction Code Creation for a Table/View
    Regards
    Pavan

Maybe you are looking for