Internal order/GL account mapping

Hello everybody,
could you please help me to understand where can I find a correspondence between Internal Order and G/L Account?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards, Anton Grebelny.

Hi,
In OKB9 you can assign internal orders to a cost element (G/L account) or to create a substitution for this (OBBH).
In the field status group from the g.l account you can setup if you can , have or not can use a internal order for a g/l account
Paul

Similar Messages

  • Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'

    Dear All
    I want Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'
    i.e
    Created Assets with Tcode As01
    Created Internal Order and assigned budget amount to IO with Tcode KO01 and KO22
    Created Purhcase Requisition with Account assignment catg as 'A' i.e asstes. Also given Internal Order No and Asset code in PR.
    Releases PR with ME54N
    Created Purchase Order with Account assignemnt catg as 'A' i.e asstes.  In Purchase Order it displays Internal Order No. and Asset code which i have given in PR in Account assignemnt tab on Item level
    Released Purchase Order.
    Now i am checking budget detail in Tcode : S_ALR_87013019  -> List: Budget/Actual/Commitments ,  Here it gives message , "No line item were selected " in Commitment line items.
    Actually  my requirement is , i want budgeting thru internal order and want to use Account assignment category as 'A' (Assets) in PR and PO.
    Why it's not showing detail in report S_ALR_87013019  .
    What is solution for my requirement. Is it possible with some configuration or by other options.
    Thanx & Regards
    Swati Shah

    Hi Swati,
    You can do this in Asset Accounting. By standard MIGO Posting Date is taken as capitalization date for asset. You can configure to make it 'Document Date'.
    So, whenever user is posting thru MIGO, he will have better control on deciding capitalization date by inputting appropriate date in Document Date Field in MIGO.
    Check this thread..
    Re: Depreciation start date for asset thru MIGO
    Regards,
    Sayujya

  • Gr/IR clearing for a PO with Internal Order assigment

    Hi,
    We settle Internal order (IO)  to fixed assets.  The settlement rule is to settle the COst Element to External account .Settlement receiver is Fixed asset account.
    The Asset procured using  Service PO and we assign the Internal Order  and account assignment category 'K'  for the PO . we receive GR  ( 1000 USD)and then IR ( 600) . IR is less than the GR and is more than the tolerance . In MIRO transaction we adjust the( line item  amount from 1000 to 600 to match with IR) and post the invoice of 600.
    Now GR/IR account there is a differece.
    When we try to run GR/IR the item is not selected for Clearing with a mesage the clearing cannot be carried out as the Cost element is assigned for External account and should  and hence it cannot be cleared.
    How do I run Gr/IR clearing to adjust the difference amount.
    What is the right way to use an Internal order  in a PO with accout assignment 'K" Is it not  the right way?
    I can think of 2 options biut both are not straight forward. Hope many of you would have faced similar situation and appreciate to get yr experience/Suggestion  for this. Anyhow I  put forth the following options  as below
    Option 1. Change the GL account assignment  in PO and then settle it. Pass a JV to adjust the difference beiween 2 GL accounts.
    Option 2  : Use a temp Interna Order for PO with different CE and then Transfer the amount from Temp IO to another IO which is having settlement rule to settle it to Fixed asset. so no  issue of clash of cost elements.
    Appreciate your early response on this
    Regards,
    Chitras

    resolved

  • GL account in Purchase order with account assignmt cat F

    Hi,
    I am creating a PO with account asignment category F (Internal Order) and entered the Internal Order in account assignemnt category.
    but at that time, system is asking for currecny.
    We dont want to enter the GL manually so can anyone help me from where this GL will be defaulted.
    Thanks,
    Sudha

    Hi Sudha,
    Usually PO of the nature F(internal Order) & K(cost center) are meant to book for services or items/material for which master data doen't exist & they are directly charged to expense. So at the time of creating PO, details of GL, cost center/internal order are entered manually in usual scenario.
    However, if you still want to expore the automatic assignment then you can check in Tcode OBYC, transaction type "Account-assigned purchase order -     KBS". You have to activate the same & then maintain.
    Regards,
    Akhil

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • SWL SC only considers partial amount of Internal Order

    Greetings, Experts.
    We are using SRM 4.0 - Classic and use Portal for creating SC.
    We have an Internal Order no. 1111 in the backend with original budget as 1000 GBP and unassigned budget as 700 GBP (1000 less 300 assigned to already created PO's). The Internal order is created for Controlling Area CA01 which has PDR as the currency.
    We create SHOP WITH LIMIT (SWL) SC in USD currency with this internal order as account assignment. Reason of using USD (instead of GBP which is the Internal order currency) is - we want PO in USD because Vendor currency is USD. The resultant PO will have account assignment = F(order) and Item Cat=D (service).
    For simplicity sake assume that 700 GBP = 1200 USD.
    When we specify limit amount as 1200 USD in SWL SC, the system throws error that this amount exceeds the budget. Not only this, say for any amount more than 300 USD, the system keeps on throwing this error and we can not create the SC.
    In essence, we can not use the full unassigned amount to crete SWL SC.
    The system allows to create SC if Limit amount is less than 300 USD.
    We have tested -
    1) If we create SHOP SC (as against SWL), the system allows full unassigned amount of internal order.
    2) If we create stand-alone PO in the backend, the system allows full unassigned amount of internal order.
    Please help in resolving - why the system does not allow full unassigned amount of internal order while creating SWL SC?
    Thanks and regards
    Vilas

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes -></b>
    Note 640369 - Incorrect values in dropdown in account assignment details
    Note 1027656 - Simplified pricing:wrong price calculation in SC using prod.
    Note 1038241 - Simplified pricing: Follow-on note to note 1027656
    Note 1034949 - Wrong price in SC when a product has multiple conditions
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • OKB9-Internal order assignment is not working

    Dear Guru
      I have an Requirment that whenever Billing document get posted data must flow to xxxxx Internal order.I assign the Internal order to cost element in OKB9.But not when posting billing document I cant see internal order in accounting or general ledger view.

    Hi Deepali
    If copa is active, revenue will post to copa. Okb9 is just a default and is used when no other cost object found
    If you want biling to post only to Int order, assign it in your sales order account assignment tab
    Note that in vkoa, you will need to maintain GL acct against Kofi and kofk both in that case
    If you want it to post to both IO and copa, enter IO along with Prof segment in sales order
    Br. Ajay M

  • Internal Order process config details and process flow

    Hi All,
    Please help me,
    I need process flow and configuration for assets to buy from vendors and store it and sell to our stores.
    how to config Internal order configuration step by step and post to Asset management. (Instead of normal sales for revenue account).
    Thanks and regards

    Dear Ravi,
    1. first create an internal order through KO01. That internal order type should be for investment purpose.
    2. Give the relevant detials and go to investment tab and give investment profile.
    3 Then in toolbar go to extras and select "asset under construction". An asset under construction would be created and give the details of this asset.
    4. Then release the internal order in KO02.
    5. Then go to GB60 and post a invoice with this internal order as account assignment object.
    6. GO to KO02 and in extras see the order balance. that amount would be reflected in the order.
    7. now go to KO88 and execute the internal order through which your internal order will be credited and AUC which you created would be debited.
    8. Now go to KO02 and see the order balance it would show 0 as it is moved to AUC.
    9. Now to go to settement rule and give the asset to which u want to transfer this amount and take the category as FXA and give the detials.
    9. now go to KO02 and change the status of internal order to "TECO complete".
    10 Now go to KO88 and execute the order and now the AUC is credited and your asset is debited.
    This is the exhaustive steps which i think wil solve your purpose.
    But make sure the configuration about the order type and investment profile are properly maintained.
    Thanks
    sap firdo

  • Unable to settle internal order

    Hi ALL,
    Currently we are trying to settle an internal order but every time we execute KO88, we get a message that either there is nothing to settle or it is already settled.
    i have the checked the balance of the internal order account in kob1 and it is showing a balance.
    the settlement rule also is set at 100% FUL.
    plz suggest any other option that needs to be checked to fix the issue.
    regards
    Arvind Kumar

    Hi ALL,
    the issue has been resolved.
    someone had passed a manual jv from the internal order account to balance sheet account.
    this was done as a Revex PO was raised with the internal order GL account number instead of the material expense gl account.
    the migo was reversed and correct gl account was entered.
    thanks all for your help.
    regards
    Arvind Kumar

  • Internal Order Process for Assets

    Hi experts,
    Can you please provide the process from internal order to settlement for assets.
    And is the process is same for normal assets and AUC?.
    Can we change the Order Status for AUC?
    Thanks,
    Ravi.

    Dear Ravi,
    1. first create an internal order through KO01. That internal order type should be for investment purpose.
    2. Give the relevant detials and go to investment tab and give investment profile.
    3 Then in toolbar go to extras and select "asset under construction". An asset under construction would be created and give the details of this asset.
    4. Then release the internal order in KO02.
    5. Then go to GB60 and post a invoice with this internal order as account assignment object.
    6. GO to KO02 and in extras see the order balance. that amount would be reflected in the order.
    7. now go to KO88 and execute the internal order through which your internal order will be credited and AUC which you created would be debited.
    8. Now go to KO02 and see the order balance it would show 0 as it is moved to AUC.
    9. Now to go to settement rule and give the asset to which u want to transfer this amount and take the category as FXA and give the detials.
    9. now go to KO02 and change the status of internal order to "TECO complete".
    10 Now go to KO88 and execute the order and now the AUC is credited and your asset is debited.
    This is the exhaustive steps which i think wil solve your purpose.
    But make sure the configuration about the order type and investment profile are properly maintained.
    Thanks
    sap firdo

  • Internal Order Settlement to GL account

    Hi,
    I am trying to settle a Internal order to a GL account. A cost centre is also mapped in automatic account assignment for this GL account.
    Everything is fine but the settled cost is not appearing in cost centre report. But there is an statistical posting on this report.
    I want to see the real psoting on cost centre report and not statistical postings.
    Any advice or workaround....
    Thanks a  lot.
    Govind

    Why are you posting to a GL? Where did the Internal Order gets its costs from? Something doesn't make sense here.
    Modify your settlement rule by creating a settlement to this Cost Centre. As long as your Allocation Structure is defined well, you don't need to mention a Cost Element. Make sure the Settlement Profile, etc. are defined and assigned to the Order Type etc. That config I hope is in place.
    Now run your settlement and it should work well.
    Cheers.

  • Open Items in GR/IR Account Internal Order wise

    Hi,
    Is it possible to view Open Items in GR/IR Account Internal Order wise?. We are assigning Internal Order in Goods Receipt and want to view Open items for the particular Order.
    Regards,
    Amanullah

    Thanks for your response.
    I already review the accounting and is pretty fine.
    The system creates document type WE and RE for the Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt.
    Unfortunately in transaction FBLN the system shows as a Open Item, and honestly I don't know the reason.
    I really appreciate any help for this issue.
    Regards.

  • BAPI_PO_CHANGE not updating internal order no. in account assignment

    Hi,
    I am using 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE' to update the internal order no.
    I am first fetching the existing account assignment line items using 'BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1' and then modifying the internal order no. as below.
            lt_poaccount-orderid = '310021000000'.
            MODIFY lt_poaccount INDEX lv_poacc_tabix TRANSPORTING orderid.
            lt_poaccountx-po_item = gt_po-ebelp.
            lt_poaccountx-orderid = 'X'.
            APPEND lt_poaccountx.
    but while calling the BAPI, the original values are returned and the message is 'No Data Changed'.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'
          EXPORTING
            purchaseorder = gt_distinct_po-ebeln
          TABLES
            return        = lt_return
            poaccount     = lt_poaccount
            poaccountx    = lt_poaccountx.
    (The internal order no. is different than the original)
    Can somebody please assist me on this?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Kumar,
    I recommend you to try changing the internal order manually through transaction ME22N and see if that is possible in your system first.
    After that if that isn't possible you should contact your MM Expert for advise.
    Regards,
    Gilberto Li

  • Account Assignment field in Sales Order (Internal Order)

    Hi SD Guru's
    In my sales order i have two items with two different item categories....for the 1st item in the account assignment field i can see internal order number field, in the 2nd item i cant see that internal order field. What do i do? Any customization settings?
    Regards
    Ravi

    Hi Ravi,
    it is due to profit centre accounting / costing is active, it is better to get it clearified from a FICO consultant
    regards,
    Santosh

  • GL account to  be changed so that the Internal Order field is mandatory

    Hello,
    We wand GL account to  be changed so that the Internal Order field is mandatory?  Nothing should be posted to this account without an Internal order and therefore, if this was a mandatory field people would be forced to put the Internal order # in up front rather than forgetting to add it in.
    The account is P&L account.
    Please let us know how to configure this?
    BR,
    Zulfikar

    Hi, other than setting the GL account as a cost element, you can assign a field status group that has internal order as a mandatory field.
    In spro, go to Financial accounting global setting > Document > Line item > Controls > Maintain Field Satus Variant.
    Select the Field status group that you want to change or you can copy any standard group and rename it as a new group. In the group, you will need to go to "Additional Account Assignment". Change CO/PP order to become "Required Entry".
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Reverie

Maybe you are looking for

  • Originating document number not updated for one invoice line item

    Hi, We have a invoice document number in which the originating document number is not updated for one of the line items ,this is order related down payment invoice .May be this is due to system inconsistency so is there any SAP note to overcome this

  • BPM and SOA

    Hi all, I would like know your feeling about BPM and SOA. Are BPM and SOA on top one of the other from a stack point of view ? Or BPM and SOA are the two sides of the same coin ? In your opinion is BPM that deliver service orientation or service-orie

  • Use of 'Refresh' option in Oracle BI Menu - MS Office Integration

    Hi, Recently I have installed the bioffice plug in my machine and I am able to connect to the shared folders and insert the table layout reports into the excel sheet. In the Oracle BI menu, I see two options 'Refresh' and 'Refresh all'. Could anyone

  • Cfcalendar date formatting

    cfcalendar returns Tue Apr 22 00:00:00 GMT-0400 2008 but when I output dateFormat(TestDate,'mm/dd/yyyy') I get 04/22/2000 Is there a way to correctly parse that kind of timestamp? Thanks! <cfcalendar width="200" height="180" name="TestDate" selectedd

  • Workflow refresh in ECC

    Hi all, We have serious problems refreshing our workflow definitions in ECC. When I do a 'test execute' in the workflow template, everything goes ok and the workflow behaves like we designed it. When we test it 'live', the workflow does complete othe