INTRASTAT reporting rules for France french (receipt)

Hello experts,
I would like to know the rules for selection and inclusion of the data for the INTRASTAT report for import.
My country is FRANCE. I know that the logic depends on the country.
I've not found a thread explaining France.
My SAP is 4.7.
Thanks a lot for any response

Hi,
I suggest you the Note 1016386 - Intrastat for Romania. Althought it is for Romania, this note contains a document that explain the setttings in IMG, functional steps, etc...
In notes, if you search notes with the string 'INTRASTAT FRANCE' you have around 25 notes by legal changes. The differences in countries are formats of files, paper declarations, etc..
Each country call a report to do the 'document' (file or paper) In your case: RVEXDAIF and RVEXPAIF. Run it in SE38 and read the info.
If you need something else, let me know it.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Similar Messages

Intrastat reporting

Hi,
We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
we have 1 PO for which we did the following
1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
Kindly correct me if my understanding is worng.
Thanks & Regards
R.M.

Ruchir Mishra wrote:
Hi,
>
> We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
>
> we have 1 PO for which we did the following
> 1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
> 2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
> 3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
> 4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
>
> Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
>
> 1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
>
> 2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
>
> Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
> As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
I have some doubts and comments
How is it possible that you reverse a movement of July in September?
SAP allows only posting in current and previous period. Hence you cannot have reversed the a JULY receipt in September.
You get an Intrastat entry for August, because you had no invoice in July and no invoice in August, but you have to report a movement latest a month after its occurance. If the invoice is not present then this movement is reported with the PO value.
You wrote you reversed it in September with 101 (usually you reverse with 102 movement), can this be the root cause to have it twice in the September report?
Before you execute Intrastat technically in SAP, you should already know about the procedure outlined by your government.
Usually cancellations/corrections have to be reported manually in a special form.
see the general guide in
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task=noticesixty

VX99 Intrastat reporting

Please could you let me know what is the new in the Intrastat cockpit VX99 compared to standard Intrastat reporting? Is there white paper/release notes that summarize the new functionalities?

Ruchir Mishra wrote:
Hi,
>
> We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
>
> we have 1 PO for which we did the following
> 1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
> 2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
> 3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
> 4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
>
> Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
>
> 1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
>
> 2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
>
> Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
> As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
I have some doubts and comments
How is it possible that you reverse a movement of July in September?
SAP allows only posting in current and previous period. Hence you cannot have reversed the a JULY receipt in September.
You get an Intrastat entry for August, because you had no invoice in July and no invoice in August, but you have to report a movement latest a month after its occurance. If the invoice is not present then this movement is reported with the PO value.
You wrote you reversed it in September with 101 (usually you reverse with 102 movement), can this be the root cause to have it twice in the September report?
Before you execute Intrastat technically in SAP, you should already know about the procedure outlined by your government.
Usually cancellations/corrections have to be reported manually in a special form.
see the general guide in
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task=noticesixty

Credit/Debit memo in Intrastat Report

Dear Gurus
I am getting the VE01 Intrastat Report correctly for Sales Invoices. However When I create Credit/Debit note with reference to Sales Invoice it does not appear in VE01 report.
I believe it is because there is no material movement involved here. However in VEO1 Screen we have option of selecting Credit/ Debit memo, Cancellation Invoice.
How would then this documents will be reported then.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

Dear Gurus
I am getting the VE01 Intrastat Report correctly for Sales Invoices. However When I create Credit/Debit note with reference to Sales Invoice it does not appear in VE01 report.
I believe it is because there is no material movement involved here. However in VEO1 Screen we have option of selecting Credit/ Debit memo, Cancellation Invoice.
How would then this documents will be reported then.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

Intrastat report duplicating receipts for corrections

Hi,
The situation is that,GR (movt.type-101)was done and then a reversal (movt type-102)was done and again GR was done.Now in Intrastat report only GR is getting displayed but not the Reversal.I mean to say that there are two entries for GR but there is no entry for the reversal done.Can anybody help why the Reversal is not getting displayed.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Intrastat report executed in MEIS / VE01, and inturn it updates table *VEIAV. Please check whether the table VEIAV updates the GR reversal. Other reason can be in the dates. Check whether the GR reversal/cancellation posted in a new month or else verify whether you have entered the correct month of declaration etc. Thanking you.

San Marino to be included for Italy Intrastat reporting

Hello All,
We have to include San Marino in EU Country Members for Italy Intrastat Reporting.
San Marino should be visible in folder "INtrastat" under folder "EU Countries" after executiing transaction "ENGR".
TX "ENGR" > PERIODIC DECLARATION.
we have already maintained SM (San marino) as a EU country in table T005.
Regards,
Ajit

Ajit
Did you try setting up SM in T Code VEB2- Special Rule Country / Region
Generally check your Foreign Trade (FT) settings, especally here:
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Periodic Declarations/Control Data
and
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Legal Control/Foreign Trade Data by Country of Destination
Also there are several OSS notes if you search by keyword 'San Marino'. Check them out.

Statistical Value in MEIS for INTRASTAT reporting

Hello,
From reveiwing related posts I understand that the statistical value on the INTRASTAT report comes from a system default exchange rate that uses the average exchange rate from the border crossing rate (GRWR condition on the PO) and the exchange rate on the invoice.
What is the exact calculation that is being used to determine the statistical value on the MEIS report?
Thanks,

Thanks very much for the link.
We do have the GRWR conditions set up, and the statistical value is populating correctly on the PO.
The issue I'm having is that I can't properly explain how the reported statistical value (VEIAV- GRENZEWEAK) is calculated.
For example:
VEIAV - GRENZWEAK is 5,405.86 SEK
GRWR on PO 572.03 EUR 5,299.22 SEK (Ex rate: 9.26389)Goods Receipt 504.79 EUR 4,681.78 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)
Freight 40.00 EUR 370.99 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)Invoice 503.00 EUR 4,770.43 SEK (Ex rate: 9.48395)
Do you know how SAP arrives at 5,405.86 SEK with these inputs?
Thanks,

Intrastat reporting for STO

Hi All,
We have a plant abroad located in Hungary to which we despatch goods through STO from UK. Please let me know if we are supposed to report this transaction in the intrastat arrival for Hungary and despatch for UK. If yes, please let me know exactly at what point the same will reflect in the intrastat reporting. Will it get reflected immediately on STO posting and running the update through MEIS/VE01?
Regards
Suresh

Hi,
I suggest you the Note 1016386 - Intrastat for Romania. Althought it is for Romania, this note contains a document that explain the setttings in IMG, functional steps, etc...
In notes, if you search notes with the string 'INTRASTAT FRANCE' you have around 25 notes by legal changes. The differences in countries are formats of files, paper declarations, etc..
Each country call a report to do the 'document' (file or paper) In your case: RVEXDAIF and RVEXPAIF. Run it in SE38 and read the info.
If you need something else, let me know it.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Balance of Payment (BOP) for France - Report RFIDITSR00

I'm trying to run the report RFIDITSR00 for E84 declaration. I had followed all the setups in the SAP Note 928316 but I do not have any information with the report. Can someone help me? I do not understand why is not picking up the items.

Hello Renan,
Thanks for your answer, with the correction made by SAP.
Good to know: the document C80 issued by the French central bank conflicts with the solution made by SAP. After some inquiries It sound like this C80 document is an old document still to be replaced by a new one in compliance with the sap solution.
http://www.banque-france.fr/fr/statistiques/telechar/economie_balance/regle_bal/fiche_20.pdf
see page 3 chapter 2.9
Thanks again.
Henri

Intrastat Report in ECC 6 for Inter Company Billing

Hi Experts,
Need your input.
In business case, Company code A raise intercompany invoice on Company B for Goods deliverd by Co A directly to End customer of Co B.
Since there is no actual Physical goods receipt by Company B, the intrastat report is not fetching any data as goods are directly delivered to End Customer by Co A.
Can Somebody help me ..how can we customise...the Report so that Company B will have Goods Arrival Report data.

Hi Anil,
I am sorry , i can't get you. You mean abaper will enter temp data .. in Dev server not in PRD..
What do u means by that... since we want this report in PRD...so ultimately the same report needs in PRD also...and u mean that abaper will create temp data in Dev server only...
can u please be more elaborative...in steps..

PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

All,
Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
The help message says:
The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
Many Thanks,
Colm

Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
processing under contract.
u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
(Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
(nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
(Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
(e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
products.
Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
Examples:
1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
purchased by the domestic contractor.
As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
gearbox unit.
This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
emblem mounted on the vehicle.
Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
conserving).
This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

Report on settlement profile/rule for the Process Orders ?

Is there any report which will display settlement profile for process order or settlement rule for process order.

Hi,
Did you try this one: KOSRLIST_OR - Settlement Rules?
Regards,
Eli

Devolped an ALV report for daily cash receipts for selected date range

hi,
             how to devlop an ALV report for daily cash receipts for selected date range.for this report what are the tables and fields we have to use.what is the selectionscreen&what is logic.give me sample report.

hi,
             how to devlop an ALV report for daily cash receipts for selected date range.for this report what are the tables and fields we have to use.what is the selectionscreen&what is logic.give me sample report.

Devloped an ALV report for daily cash receipts for selected date range

hi,
             how to devlop an ALV report for daily cash receipts for selected date range.for this report what are the tables and fields we have to use.what is the selectionscreen&what is logic.give me sample report.

Hi,
You can develop simple reports using Report Painter.
You may be also interested in:
Check report SAPMF05A for credit memo
See the following Std reports on Payment Advices execute the Tcodes:
S_ALR_87009888
S_ALR_87009889
S_ALR_87009890
S_ALR_87009891
S_ALR_87009892
S_ALR_87009893
S_ALR_87009978
S_ALR_87009979
S_ALR_87009980
S_ALR_87009981
S_ALR_87009982
S_ALR_87009983
S_ALR_87010056
S_ALR_87010057
S_ALR_87010058
S_ALR_87010059
S_ALR_87010060
S_ALR_87010061
S_ALR_87010066
S_ALR_87010067
S_ALR_87012106
S_ALR_87012107
S_ALR_87012108
S_ALR_87012109
S_ALR_87012110
S_ALR_87012111
S_ALR_87012116
S_ALR_87012117
S_ALR_87012200
S_ALR_87012201
S_ALR_87012202
S_ALR_870122
S_ALR_87012204
S_ALR_87012205
S_ALR_87012350
S_ALR_87012351
S_ALR_87012352
S_ALR_87012353
S_ALR_87012354
S_ALR_87012355
sample ALV report:
tables:
marav. "Table MARA and table MAKT
Data to be displayed in ALV
Using the following syntax, REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE can auto-
matically determine the fieldstructure from this source program
Data:
begin of imat occurs 100,
matnr like marav-matnr, "Material number
maktx like marav-maktx, "Material short text
matkl like marav-matkl, "Material group (so you can test to make
                        " intermediate sums)
ntgew like marav-ntgew, "Net weight, numeric field (so you can test to
                        "make sums)
gewei like marav-gewei, "weight unit (just to be complete)
end of imat.
Other data needed
field to store report name
data i_repid like sy-repid.
field to check table length
data i_lines like sy-tabix.
Data for ALV display
TYPE-POOLS: SLIS.
data int_fcat type SLIS_T_FIELDCAT_ALV.
select-options:
s_matnr for marav-matnr matchcode object MAT1.
start-of-selection.
read data into table imat
select * from marav
into corresponding fields of table imat
where
matnr in s_matnr.
end-of-selection.
Now, we start with ALV
To use ALV, we need a DDIC-structure or a thing called Fieldcatalogue.
The fieldcatalouge can be generated by FUNCTION
'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE' from an internal table from any
report source, including this report.
The only problem one might have is that the report and table names
need to be in capital letters. (I had it )
Store report name
i_repid = sy-repid.
Create Fieldcatalogue from internal table
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'
       EXPORTING
            I_PROGRAM_NAME         = sy-repid
            I_INTERNAL_TABNAME     = 'IMAT' "capital letters!
            I_INCLNAME             = sy-repid
       CHANGING
            CT_FIELDCAT            = int_fcat
       EXCEPTIONS
            INCONSISTENT_INTERFACE = 1
            PROGRAM_ERROR          = 2
            OTHERS                 = 3.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
       EXPORTING
            I_CALLBACK_PROGRAM       = i_repid
            I_STRUCTURE_NAME         = 'marav'
            I_DEFAULT                = 'X'
            I_SAVE                   = 'A'
       TABLES
            T_OUTTAB                 = imat.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    WRITE: 'SY-SUBRC: ', SY-SUBRC .
ENDIF.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

Any report to check vacation rule for users?

any report to check vacation rule for users?

Hello Anand,
there is no report but you may use the production order info system with list "components" and create a layout contaning the issued quantity and/or the final issue indicator. With a correct sorting, the list should show all orders with non-issued components at the top.
Regards, Andreas

INTRASTAT reporting rules for France french (receipt)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for