Investment order settled more than posted on current month.

Dear All,
I have found a stange thing that I can't explain it.
Every month end, we will settle the investment orders to AuC accounts by KO8G. At the end of Jan, I settled all of them, but I found one investment order has settled more amount than posted on Jan.
By line item display, for example, I can see the account for Inv order has 4 postings, totally $67000.00. But after KO8G, there is $90000.00 settled to the AuC account.
No error message in test run and actual post in KO8G. Settlement rule is 100% to AuC.
I am really confused about the amount settled.
Please kindly throw some light on this. Thank you.
Emma

Hi,
The settlement was done monthly. There would be no un-settled amount. But that's a good tracker for the similar problem.
For my problem, I checked the Line Item one by one in KOB5. And I found 2 docs have the wrong expense account posted by the Inv order. So that's why the amount 23000 is calculated in settlement but not no shown in the right expense account by GL line item display.
I have done a posting to transfer the amount to right expense account.
Thank you.
Emma

Similar Messages

  • Document contains some order item more than once - invoice verification

    Hi,
    we have one cross company stock transfer process in which when a billing is created in SD side, an IDOC will be triggered automatically and create an invoice verification at the MM side.
    The problem is some of our billing of this process having an IDOC application error that said.
    Document contains same order item more than once
    Message no. M8321
    Diagnosis
    Under the following circumstances, you can settle an order item in an invoice received via EDI more than once:
    - Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined for the order item.
    - The IDoc contains the delivery note numbers of the goods receipts.
    System Response
    If this is not the case, the system cancels posting of the IDoc.
    Question:
    1 - The funny thing is IDOC showing 51 IDOC error code message on status record of INVOIC. But the invoice verfication get created in PO history.
    2 - I think this error is because we need to make the PO as GR-based Inverifcation. We have flagged it in Vendor master, and Info record, but this indicator is not flag automatically in the PO (and we cannot manually change the PO as this indicator is grey-out). How?
    3 - how to solve this error?
    Thanks

    Once PO history is created, you cannot change the "GR-based-IV" flag. Two options are there before you.
    1. Cancel all the GRs & Invoices posted in the STO then system will allow you to update the GR-based-IV flag. After updating this flag repost the GRs and invoices.
    2. Create a new STO, now since you have updated the vendor maser & info-record, this flag will automatically get updated during the STO creation itself.
    First option is tedious and should be selected only if you can go option 2 is not at all feasible

  • EDI Invoicing - Document contains same order item more than once

    Hi,
    While trying to post an inventory invoice with EDI, we are receiving the following error message: Document contains same order item more than once.
    On the PO and the inter-company invoice, the same material come more then 1 time. Can you please tell me what I could do to fix that issue? Ideally we would like to do not modify the PO or Intercompany invoice so that the same material can come more than once.
    Thanks
    Martin

    Hello,
    maybe you've resolved this problem in the meantime.
    I have encountered the exact same problem and will try solving this by setting the flag on field "GR-Bsd IV" in the purchase order at item level under the invoice tab.
    Can you verify this?
    Thanks,
    Amber Morphis

  • We found no orders placed more than 30 days ago.

    I can't download Adobe Creative Suite cs 5.5 Standard
    Was purchased ~12.2011
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1006208
    A: The following steps will help locate your software for download:
    Go to Adobe.com.
    Click Sign In (in the upper right corner).
    Enter your Adobe ID and password, and then click Sign In.
    Click My Orders and then Order History.
    Locate the order number, and click the Download link in the Downloads column.
    But my order history is empty:
    My recent orders
    We found no orders placed within the past 30 days.
    My order history
    We found no orders placed more than 30 days ago.
    How i can download software??

    Greenleavestree if you choose the option to download the software at the time of purchase then the steps posted by Bizkon39 should work.  You can find more details on how to download purchased Adobe software at http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1006208?tstart=0&promoid=KBHJQ.
    If you did not choose the download option at the time of purchase then please follow the link offered by Mylenium is message #2.

  • HT1040 Is there a way to place an order with more than one item at a time? For example I am going to make a few books and have them all shipped to me.  Do I have to order and pay shipping for each one individually?

    Is there a way to place an order with more than one item at a time?  for example I am making a few books and having them all shipped to me.  Do I have to order each one separately and pay shipping each time?

    You have to order each book separately, if the books are different. Only multiple copies of the same book can be ordered in the same order, see here
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Can a material of a sales order have more than one billing doc

    Hi,
    Can a material of a sales order have more than one billing doc(vbrp-vbeln)
    Regards,
    Seema

    Hi,
    Yes it is possible.we can have multiple invoice for a sales order of one line item.
    For this we should have order quantity not exceeds billing quantity at the item category level.
    Also we have to use teh field Quantity +/- indicator at the copy control level.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • Error : Document contains same order item more than once in IDOC

    We have Intercompany IDOCs getting created in our system. The
    trigger for this is the Billing Document in the same system in
    differenct company code. The MEssage type being used is INVOIC and the
    basic type is INVOIC01.
    The IDOC is in the status of 51 with the error message
    Document contains same order item more than once
    Message No : M8 321.
    Can anyone tell me why raise this error and how to resolve it?
    Thanks.

    What I have recently learned is that in 6.0 SAP allows the same line item to be on an idoc multiple times.  However, the item has to be GR-based-IV and there has to be a unique entry in the delivery note of the GR.   I have successfully tested this in my development system.  
    What I can't get to work is if the GRs have the same delivery note value.   What I think is happening is these GRs are not unique so SAP cannot match a GR with an IR so it fails with this error. 
    Here are the examples:
    Works 
    GR# A           deliverynote/BOL    "abcd"
    GR# B           deliverynote/BOL     "efgh"
    Invoice idoc
    e1edp02    qualifier 016          abcd
    e1edp02    qualifier 016          efgh
    Doesn't work:
    GR# A           deliverynote/BOL    "abcd"
    GR# B           deliverynote/BOL     "abcd"
    Invoice idoc
    e1edp02    qualifier 016          abcd
    e1edp02    qualifier 016          abcd
    If anyone knows of a way to make the second scenario work, I'd like to hear your solution.
    Thanks
    Sandra

  • Inreractive Report: Ordering by more than one column

    Hi Guys an Girls,
    I have a interactive report on an application that i have built. I have been asked whether it is possible to order by more than one column.
    What i mean by this is, when i click on the column heading i can order by that column ascending or descending. Is it possible to order by more than one column?
    Thanks
    -N.S.N.O.

    Hi,
    Yes you can. Just choose "Sort" on the options menu.
    Paulo Vale
    http://apex-notes.blogspot.com

  • More than 6 Calendars in Monthly View?

    Is there any way to show more than 6 Calendars in the Monthly View?
    After 6 are displayed, there are just 3 dots that indicate that there are more Calendars out of sight.
    Thanks,
    Chris.
    Message was edited by: o'crikey

    Hi Del,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Here is a link to a pdf that shows an example of what I mean:
    http://www.amson.org/ical-001.pdf
    I track projects over weeks at a time and would use ical in the Monthly View mode mostly.
    Do you see how I have 6 Calendars showing with 3 dots above them that indicates more Calendars exist, but cannot be seen in Monthly View mode. If one goes to the Weekly View mode, all the Calendars are visible. However, I need to see all (more than 6) in the Monthly View.
    I looked in Preferences and don't see any way to change this there.
    Thanks,
    Chris.

  • Why am I being charged more than $3.00 per month?

    Why am I being charged more than $3.00 per month?

    The taxes would make sense, except that the song cost .69 cents and I was charged .77 cents. Even if the additional charge was due to taxes, it should have only cost .74, maybe even .75 if it was rounded up.  So I am still being charged 2-3 cents more and this isn't the first time this has happened.  I was charged $1.03 more for an album than it cost originally.  At first I thought itas because I had bought a couple of songs from it and then decided to buy the album, but I clicked on the "complete my album" button, not the "purchase album" button.  The cost for the album was $12.99 and the cost for completing my album was supposed to be $10.99.  I know that 3 cents isn't much of a difference, but when you consider how many songs I've bought from iTunes, it makes quite a difference.  Thanks for replying and I did think about this as a possibility, but the math is not adding up.

  • Error while doing investment order settlement

    Dear all,
    My client has not settled certain line items in the
    previous year for some Investment orders. Now when he
    is carrying out settlement (KO88), for the current
    period, he is getting error message " AW 624"(first
    settle items from the previous year in the previous
    year). How can he settle previous years item in the
    current year since FI & CO periods are all closed for
    prev. year.
    The settlement rule is AUC in this case.
    Thanks in adv.
    Vijaya

    Hi
    As per note 82514:
    If you simply want to settle the unsettled values from the previous year    
    in the current year, proceed as described in Notes 425601 and 819197. If    
    settlement for the previous year is no longer possible, due to concluded    
    fiscal years in FI and CO, or the reporting problems described above        
    have to be avoided due to settlement in the previous year, settlement in    
    the current fiscal year is then particularly necessary.                     
    As far as I know, if note 425601 is fully implemented, AW624 should        
    become editable in OBA5. Could you please check if the coding has been     
    correctly applied? Especially below steps need to be done manually:                                                                               
    As a prerequisite for Transaction OBA5, you must first of all implement    
    the program corrections of note 425601 and insert  the following           
    table entries :                                                                               
    o  As of Release 4.6: Use Transaction SM31 to include application      
           area 'AW' into table V_T100SA.                                                                               
    o  Start Transaction SM31 to include the following entry in table      
           T100S:                                                              
           'Application area    MsgNo    Allowed      Standard   Switch off'   
            AW                  624      EWI          E           'X'                                                                               
    Regards
    Javier Reviriego

  • Investment order settlement?

    hi
       can anyone tell me why we settle investment order on AUC and not on cost centre.
                                                                                    regards
                                                                                    sanjay nanda

    Hi,
    COST CENTER--->The costs that arise from processing an order (for example, costs for material, personnel or external services) have the individual technical objects (equipment, functional locations) as a reference object.
    The costs are initially collected on the order. They are then transferred to the settlement receiver specified in the settlement rule. The receiver of the costs is independent of the reference object, which merely provides a proposal.
    AUC--->>Special order that settles the costs of an investment measure to an asset under construction (AuC).
    Investment measures are used to create new assets or maintain existing assets to increase their value, which you must then capitalize.
    You can settle the costs that have been collected on an investment order to an AuC. In this case, the system automatically generates a settlement rule for the AuC when the costs are first settled. If some of the costs collected on the order are to go into the costs settlement, then you can create another settlement rule (preliminary settlement) manually for these costs.
    You can test particular settlements to find out which type of settlement is most suitable for you. To simulate depreciation for an order, choose the tab page Investment in the investment order and then Depreciation simulation. The system saves the data from the depreciation simulation. The order subsequently receives a corresponding status.
    As soon as the fixed asset is completed, you can create and process your data from the order. In the case of full settlement, the system posts the values that were originally on the AuC to the completed fixed asset.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Sales order with more than 9 items causing problem

    Hi,
    I have a situation here.
    A sales order is created in the system and since it is order related billing so its billing document is also generated. The billing document is not relevant for accounting. So, the only 2 documents are a sales order and its billing document.
    Due to some technical restrictions,if the number of lines is more than 9 the printout wont come.Henceforth,the user is unable to take a printout so I need to give him a solution.
    What shall I suggest him?

    Hi,
    >So, my question is that,should I ask the user to create a credit memo wrt the billing document and then split the sales order with 2 invoices(one with say 5 and the other invoice with the rest of the quantities)?
    So, if my undestanding is right then you want to create a credit memo after invoice ? If yes, then why are you splitting the sales order ? Also, this is something strange kind of ABAP logic which would not allow to print an invoice with more than 9 line items... Now, as you said if your sales order is having more than 9 line items then only print doesn't come.. right ? then in your case at this moment there are only 9 line items so ideally you'd be able to get a print.. right ?
    I think there is some confusion out here with your two posts.. kindly clarify...
    Hrishi

  • Pending order for more than 2 weeks now...

    Been trying to check options to get some premium channels for more than two weeks now, whenever I go to the page it always show the Services Overview. It says that "Your account currently has a pending order." Can't do online ordering until the pending order is cleared.

    Hi wesandmarlene1,
    Sorry you are having difficulty ordering online. An agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue. Please remember to check your spam/junk folder if you do not hear from an agent.

  • Delete sales order created more than three days ago

    Hi Experts,
    "Business has created lot of sales order  for prepayment. Only part of them are converted to deliveries, rest are stored in database.
    In Open sales orders report old orders are confusing, because of Country legislation the conditions of a sales order are valid during 3 working days. Therefore after 3 days not paid orders should be deleted."
    Kindly let me know if we have a standard fucntionality in SAP through which we can pull open sales order more than 3 days old and then can delete the same.
    If not can you help me in understanding the Logical Flow that is needed to meet the Business Requirement through a customized program.
    Looking forward to seeing your replies.

    Hi,
    As per your business requirement stated above I recommend not to delete any sales order instead use a Zprogram for sales order and mark them as "MARK FOR REJECTION".
    Doing this will solve your problem of getting unnecessary sales order in standrad report of Open sales order as in standard Rejected Sales order are not considred as in VA05 Report. and also keep record of the sales order created by you for future purpose.
    further to this as per your business requirement you have to mark line Item wise "Mark For Rejection.
    Here in coding you can give logic from Document creation date or Document Date + 3 Days if that is < system date then mark them for rejection.
    Hope this solves your purpose.

Maybe you are looking for