Invoice Verification in LE-TRA module

Dear Gurus
Please consider the following scenario:
I make 3 deliveries with ref to a single sales in order with 40, 40 and 20 pieces respectively.
My freight is known to be Rs 150 at the time of making shipment cost.
I will settle my costs with CFA using 1 invoice for each delivery.
IE:
D1 > Inv 1
D2 > Inv 2
D3 > Inv 3
On the basis of delivery quantity for each delivery invoice verification should be made IE
1st delivery freight settlement = (quantity of 1st dlvy * total shipment cost) / total delivery quantity
= (40 x 150) / 100  = 60 (This will be for Invoice 1) and so on..
How do I make the invoice value split based on delivery quantity ?
Regards
KS

Hi Sridhar,
AS i understood ur post,
you created order for 100 qtty
delivery split into 3 - each 40 -40 * 20
total frieght amount - 150/- for the whole 100 qtty.
you have create 3 difference inovice each one for delivery.
whats ur issue then,
while creating invoice anyhow freight amount will be calulated based on qtty in invoice. just check freight amount in invoice conditions?
while settlement:-
you create shipment doc either by collecting all deliveries into one or will created individual shipment document for each delivery.
plz bit more clear what you want exactly?

Similar Messages

  • Vendor invoice and logistic invoice verification ?

    Good morning Guru,
    What is the difference between  "vendor invoice" in accounting module and "logistic invoice verification"  in MM module ?
    I know logistic invoice verification to validate between po, gr and invoice, but what vendor invoice for ?
    Thank's

    Hi
    Accounting-wise both has the same result as in both the scenarios you can debit expense and credit vendor. The advantage of Logistics Invoice Verification over Vendor Invoice is, in Logistics Invoice verification, we have three way matching of documents ie PO,GR and Invoice. So if there is any mismatch between these, the invoice will get blocked for payment. Also it checks for accuracy between PO and invoice and GR and invoice, so that the expenses are accounted accurately and price diff account also effected appropriately.
    In Vendor invoice booking, it is just like your normal journal entry and so it has not got that much authenticity over the correctness of transactions. In vendor invoice booking, there is every possibility of duplicate booking of invoice, whereas in LIV, the invoice will get blocked for payment.
    Hope it is clear.
    Regards,
    K Lakshmanan

  • Check when saving Logistics Invoice Verification (MRMBADI_INVOICE_SAVE)

    Hi everybody, we have an ECC 6.0. with IS-Retail platform, and we have noticed that during Logistics Invoice Verification process (Tx MIRO), it´s possible to make mistakes by choosing a vendor, then picking an invoice from another vendor, with the particularity that both invoices have the same delivery note number as PO reference (same vendor´s delivery note number / GOHEAD-LFSNR). The system doesn´t check if PO reference corresponds with correct vendor while saving the document.
    Our question for you is if there is a Customizing way to activate a validation which allow us to solve mistakes describe before???
    We found BAdI method IF_EX_MRM_INVOICE_UPDATE PROCESS_AT_SAVE which is processed when saving an invoice, the method calls are encapsulated in the function module MRMBADI_INVOICE_SAVE which is responsible for saving invoices.
    If there isn´t a Customizing way to activate a check like that, the second question we have for you is if you have experience with this BAdI??? Does it work with this kind of validation??? We need to ensure that PO reference corresponds to correct vendor (GOHEAD-LIFNR / RF02K-LIFNR).
    Thanks in advanced for your help,
    Regards,
    Miyuki Quiroz.

    Hi,
    Duplicate invoice check will fulfill your requirement. System will check is the invoice exists with same invoice date, reference and company code.
    Follow the path SPRO -- IMG -- MM -- LIV -- Incoming Invoice -- Set Check for Duplicate Invoices
    Also tick check box for "check double invoice" in vendor master accounting data.
    In case you want amount also as one of the checking parameters, then you need to go for validation. No standard setting is allowed for that.
    Nikhil

  • "LIV" (Logistics Invoice Verification) BI cube ?  Is there anything like ht

    I have been having a difficult time trying to get an answer to a question. 
    We currently capture Spend in R/3 by looking at the PO related invoices (posted via LIV) and the non-PO related invoices (posted via FI-AP). When we create our R/3 ABAP 'spend reports' we look at the date when the the invoices were paid (cleared), and subtotal by business area or IO#.  We cannot use the PO line item cube, because that doesn't show the spend by the paid (cleared) date of the invoice. 
    What cubes do I need to load in BI to get this same type of data?  I'm thinking it would be an "LIV" (Logistics Invoice Verification) cube, but I cannot find any information on that.

    Hi
    During the Duplicate Invoice check, the system checks for the following:
    Vendor
    Currency
    Company code
    Gross invoice amount
    Reference document number
    Invoice document date
    If the same matches, you can set up an error/warning message. The  message set up is done in:
    OBA5
    Application Area WS
    Message No.121
    Online and Batch : E
    If you want to write your own checking logic using the Business Transaction Step 110. For activating BTE
    1. Create a Function module by copying SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001110 and adding your own Abap code for duplicate invoice checking.
    2. Go to T.code FIBF and in the menu go to Settings->Products -> Of a customer
    3. Create a new product and save
    4. Again go to T.code FIBF and in the menu go to Settings->Process modules-> of a Customer
    5. Create new entry as follows and save.
    Event: 00001110 Appl:FI-FI Function Module : (Name of the FM you have created) Product : (The one which you have created)
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari
    <a href="http://www.vcq.biz/">ronaldo wallpapers</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>Hi
    <a href="http://freeebooks.name/">books online</a>, <a href="http://www.utorrent.name/">utorrent</a>

  • Invoice Verification Prepayment

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement to capture the deposit/downpayment (payment made in advance which will be used to offset the final amount to be paid) amount made for a purchase. And there is a need for the system to help prevent extra amount to be paid to the suppliers when the final payment is to be made.
    I read about this 'Prepayment' function in the MM module which seems to be suitable to be used for recording the deposit made. However, I'm having some problems with 3-way match as the prepayment invoice created forces me to enter a quantity. Does anyone know where else I can find more information on how this prepayment function works? I could only find information from SAP help documentation.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Wai Leng

    Hi Ravi,
    The config is in SPRO --> Materials Management --> Logistic Invoice Verification --> Incoming Invoice --> Prepayment.
    Subsequently, when I perform MIR7, scroll down in the header box to set the prepayment indicator.
    Sure, contact me at [email protected]
    Thanks!!

  • Newbie functional question on MM Invoice Verification

    Dear forumers,
    How can I check for a completed status of an invoice verification in the SAP MM module?
    I was told that this can be checked from the RBKP-RBSTAT field. Is it also right to say that RBSTAT = 'B' to indicate that the invoice verification is completed? Are there any other further checks required too? Would need more confirmation on this.
    Appreciate any help at all. Thanks.

    Charlie,
    Thanks for your input here.
    Well, the requirements are looking more specifically into whether a purchase order's status is overdue, or not yet due, etc. And according to the requirements too, such PO status is determined by checking on the Goods Receipt and Invoice Verification statuses as well.
    So, to check for completed Goods Receipt, I used this condition: EKPO-WEPOS = u2018Xu2019. And to check for incomplete Goods Receipt, I used this condition: EKPO-WEPOS = u2018 '.
    To check for incomplete Invoice Verification, I think I can use this condition: RBKP-RBSTAT = u2018B'. And to check the incomplete Invoice Verification, I think I can use this condition: RBKP-RBSTAT not equals to u2018B'.
    Could you please help to verify this for me? Or do I need to use other fields to check on this condition as well, i.e. EKPO-ELIKZ or EKPO-REPOS?

  • MM invoice verification against delivery with no Good Receipts - will it work ?

    Dear all,
    Let me quickly explained my issue.
    We have moved to INcoterms FCA, meaning that property transfer is taken when goods are loaded at the vendor site.
    No transportation module is implemented. We create an inbounds delivery when receiving info from carrier. And later on, we are receiving against it. Transport module is not implemented.
    But we need to post invoice before the Goofs is physically received because of long transportation time.
    My questions - I guess it is basic, I am not a MM expert - far from it -
    1) Will it be possible to post the invoice against the delivery without the good being physically  received.
    2) Property of the goods is not yet transfered before receiving - despite the incoterm- Well,  I guess so - how the financial posting will work when creating the invoice.
    Many thanks for your help.
    regards,
    Pierre Mikael

    Thank tou for your answer.
    This is driven by the Incoterms. With FCA, the ownership is transfered when the carrier is loading the Goods.
    But physically, it will be received in3 to 6 weeks, I cannot do a GR, it will mess up planning.
    BUt the property is transferred already. This is the reason why
    1. we create Inbounds Delivery (Carrier loads the goods)
    2. Invoice
    3. GR when physically receiving the goods.
    We have no transport management implemented. -
    Therefore imagine I have a PO of 10, 5 are loaded by Carrier - delivery is created - Can I have Invoice verification on 5 only ?
    Regards,
    Pierre MIkael

  • Modulepool for import invoice verification & subcontract adjustments

    Hi,
    any one can help me to development of Module pool program for Import Invoice verification.....pls give me atleast guidelines if you are not giving copletedetails. and also another one to develop of Module pool program for Subcontract adjustments.
    thank you in advance...
    with regards
    bheem

    Hi Madan,
    Please check If you have already captured excise. You have to refer excise invoice while doing MIGO. Also ensure the correct excise invoice no. is entered (or) look at J1I7 report to find them.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

  • Wrong G/L account about Invoice verification for Subcontract PO under ML

    Hi Expert,
    In our project, we implement the subcontract po process with material functionality actived.  When do the Invoice verification, the exchange rate difference between GR/IR is posted to PRD, not KDM.
    I tested further for different business scenarios and result is below:
    1、If Company code currency is SGD and  2nd currency USD but No material ledger functionality
    Non subcontract PO:  IR exchange rate difference post to KDM
    Subcontract PO: IR exchange rate difference post to FRL
    2、If Company code currency is SGD and  2nd currency USD  with material ledger functionality
    Non subcontract PO:  IR exchange rate difference post to KDM
    Subcontract PO: IR exchange rate difference post to PRD
    Now I  found somebody mentioned note 980402 may work for the issue.
    Anyone has the exact answer about the solution?
    Regards
    Jimmy

    Hi,
    The root cause for the issue is that: SAP standard program is not correct for the forms GET_DATA_V_169P_PK and DB_UPD_V_169P_PK of function module VIEWPROC_V_169P_PK
    Only four fields are processed in the program. No code for fields KDHW and KDML1 which are the indicate flag in the configuration point.
    Regards

  • Invoice Verification Tolerances

    Hi,
    When the vendor invoices are matched with Purchase Orders and goods receipt notes at the time of invoice verification.At the time of  invoice matching process it was found that, invoices can be processed for values which are higher than the product of Purchase
    How can we get out  of this problem?
    Regards

    Hi,
       You can maintain the invoice tolerances in MM module. When u enter the invoice values , system will the prices or quantity with the PO level. If it exceeds the tolerance , system will block the invoice. The invoices are blocked for payment.
       Then some authorised person should manually release for invoices.  This will give a better control . Hope this helps.
        Assign points as way of thanks.
    Thanks
    Dasa

  • Electronic invoice verification

    Dear SAP community!
    We are planning to start using of electronic invoice verification procedure. According to our rules invoices without variances or with small differences should be parked as complete. Invoice with price differences should be saved with unclarified errors, but invoices with quantity differences should be reduced due to vendor error. I investigated this problem and found that for this purposes IDOC INVOIC01 would be useful, but can I assign status "park as complete" to no errors invoices, and split vendor's errors into "unclarified error:park invoice" and "vendor error:reduce invoice"?
    Thank You,
    Natalija

    Hi Karen,
    According to Note 103051 - EDI: Multiple reference to same purchase order item.
    Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM (only as of Release 4.0) for the logistics invoice verification can distinguish different goods receipts by means of the delivery note number. For this purpose, GR-related invoice verification must be active. Please check the note.
    Thank you,
    Shyam

  • No invoice verification if stock is not cleared by quality.

    Dear all,
    I believe this had been discussed in length in this forum and the provocation for posting this again is that I feel that i miss something and hence i do not have the privilage to enjoy this functionality.
    I have defined the QM control key 0010 and also the quality information record is available - we are using QM module and material passes via QM only.
    I got information from this forum that the message type M8 280 has to be set as error to achieve this functionality of preventing invoice verification if material is not cleared by quality.
    I have made everything and to my suprise i find this not stopped with the error message by the system.
    Can any one throw some light on where will this error message stop and do I have to maintain any other masters and or corrections to the setting.
    Your help will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    M.M

    Hi Craig,
    You are right. Thanks to all experts for your valuable inputs which helped to proceed further. I am not using the exit, instead the message trigger during MIRO "'Blocked for Payment" is fine. As Jurgen already mentioned if QM config is in place QM has done its job of Blocking the Payment if inspection lot is not cleared by quality. Through MRBR block needs to be released and further online payment needs to be processed.
    Since user wants to do manual invoice also for various reasons system is configured by FI in OB27 without flagging "Manual Payments block", hence though Payment is blocked in MIRO, manually able to clear payment in F-53 without releasing the block in MRBR. Looks like more visibility should be given to FI and QM users to avoid manual payments in case of Payment Blocks.
    Currently while testing i am facing another issue. As per SAP Help if Invoice Block is activated in control key then  "'Blocked for Payment" should trigger in two cases like (1) If UD is not done (2) If inspection lot is rejected. But even if inspection lot is accepted and qty is posted to unrestricted stock during MIRO i am getting the message as "'Blocked for Payment". Before posting the invoice  Payment Block is 'Free for Payment" and after posting invoice in display mode i could see the Payment Block as 'Invoice Verification" which is supposted to be "Free for Payment" since inspection lot is cleared. Any suggestion to fix the issue will be appreciable.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramagiri

  • Excise Duty (IS-OIL) - Invoice verification and accounting ED

    Hello experts,
    I have a case in my importation process with excise duty (IS-OIL). I have the following scenario: Purchasing Ed free material and receive it in ED paid Storage Location. So I use Handling type 00 and Valuation type TAX in the PO excise duty item data. I woul like to kwon Which is the standard process for the invoice verification of the excise duty cost when the handling type is 00 and the valuation type TAX?. And How can I do the invoice verification (MIRO) if there is not a specific line in the purchase order history for the excise duty cost?
    I have another case in the accounting of movement type 301 (transfer posting between 2 plants). The accounting posting is the following:
    Examle:
    Account                       Transaction
    1. STOCK FUEL          S                    BSX (Stock account)
    2. STOCK FUEL            H             BSX (Stock account)
    3. STOCK EXCISE DUTY     S             SVO (ED Account)
    4. EXCISE DUTY FUEL           H             ZZP (ED Account)     
    The problem is that the 4th account must be STOCK EXCISE DUTY ACCOUNT from SVO transaction.
    I would be grateful if someone could help me with these cases.
    Thank in advance.
    Pablo

    Dear Prashant,
    Thanks for reply, but i checked my excise cond types, in all conditions, cond cat is blank & cond class 'A' is maintained i.e. Discount & Surcharge.
    My problem is that, my excise value is not got posted in net receivable value in accounts. This problem arise, when we make sales order, Net Value field doesn't pick excise there & while invoicing, it post only the base value & rounding off adjustments at header level. I don't know, from where this Net Value field in sales order is picking the value but my problem will solve if my grand total value(base valueexciseedu cess+higher edu cess) will pass to Net Value field while making sales order. Kindly help.

  • PO valueless that goods receipt value once Invoice verification is done

    HI Gurus,
    I
    have created a PO for Value 2500 with Account assignment F (Order), done Invoice verification for value 2500. Then I have changed this line item value to 1500 in POand then tried doing Goods receipt against the PO. This way I was expecting system to throw an error at the tiem of GR but it posted GR successfully that too for an value of 2500 without giving an error or any message system should not post 2500 value as PO value at the time of GR was 1500 or it should have posted a GR for value 1500.
    Pls assist me in understanding the system behavior.
    Thank you in advance.
    Regards
    Nilesh

    I guess you need to ristrict changing value for PO line item if  Invoice verification is done that will solve lot many problems

  • Purchase Orders Pending for Invoice Verification

    Good Afternoon,
    I'm looking a report with purchase orders waiting or pending for Invoice Verification.
    Those PO's already has the Goods Receipt, and just pending for Invoice Verification.
    Thanks for the help.
    Hector.

    Use report ME2N with selection parameter as RECHNUNG.
    or else you can create your own seleciton parameter where you can pull the report only for the invoice which has GR done.
    to do that go to SPRO-MM-purchasing-reporting-maintain purchaisng list-selection parameter-define seleciton parameter
    hit new entry or copy RECHNUNG
    create new one with
    IR planned  +
    Delivered  >= 0 ord
    and Invoiced  < ord
    save and use this parameter in ME2N
    you will only get the POs list where GR done but no IR

Maybe you are looking for

  • Empty cell until value entered in different cell

    I am trying to create a formula that will leave a certain cell empty until the first cell is populated. The problem is that the cell that first needs to be populated will not have the same value in it.  Basically, I am creating a daily chart where I

  • Pctfree=0-table high free blockspace ratio?

    I have been looking at Metalink and Asktom but could not find what I was looking for so perhaps one of you can help me. I have a table that seems to keep on growing when no data is added. Details: - db block size = 8k - only deletes and inserts are d

  • InCopy Plug-ins

    I've spent the last few days installing, uninstalling and reinstalling CS5 to try and get around all the quirks. One of the few that remain is that whenever I launch InDesign CS5, I get a series of error messages, mostly relating to InCopy.  For exam

  • Cursor help needed

    Hi All, I have a set of tables Orig_tab1 ... Orig_tab30 and tmp_tab1... tmp_tab30, I have migrating the data to sqlserver from oracle 10g, by creating the tmp_tabs for 30 Orig_tabs and changing the data type of date,number to char in tmp_tabs tables

  • Laptop can not find the router.

    Yeah. First of all I'm not so technical so... sorry. Fancy internet talk and such would most likely confuse me. First of all, I bought a WRT54G2 router. The Staples employee assured me that I'd be able to connect me and my sister's laptops to the int