Ip Contract table full
Hi all
We are facing below error
*"Print k 411 message suppress"*
*"ip_contract:table full,dropping packet"*
how to resolve this and what is the main cause of this issue..any idea please
Bashir,
Try to avoid using function in the where block. If functions are used then normal indexes are not used .. (nvl for pcak.segment4 and pcak.segment5)
If you "have" to use nvl function, then create function-based index for pcak.segment4 and pcak.segment5
As for hrou.name, there must be an index for this. And thats why when you give hrou.name ='xyz', query must be using one of the index that has this column.
Sudhanshu Bhandari
perotsystems TSI
Similar Messages
-
How to know an order number from the service contracts table
Hi all,
I want to know how the order entry module and service contracts module are connected. I mean to ask if a service is placed as an order for purchase how do i get the information about the order_id or order_number from the service contracts table.
please point me in a direction so as to which tables i should be lookling at.
Thanks.Try OKC_K_REL_OBJS table. The column JTOT_OBJECT1_CODE contains values 'OKX_ORDERHEADER' or 'OKX_ORDERLINE' and the column RTY_CODE = 'CONTRACTSERVICEORDER'. The column OBJECT1_ID1 should store order HEADER_ID or LINE_ID based on JTOT_OBJECT1_CODE value. Hope this helps.
-
Initial download of Z contract table from R/3 to CRM
Hi,
We have two contract tables called ZCONTRACTHEAD and ZCONTRACTITEM in our R/3 system which we bring to our CRM system to the same respective tables.
We use a downloadable object ZZCONN_HEAD and ZZCONN_ITEM in transaction r3ac1 and do an initial download using r3as.
My problem is that in CRD client 200 which is mapped to R/3 client 200, this download does not bring any data into CRM. The download says complete but I get a BDOC error in SMW01 saying validation error.
This download works perfectly fine in CRD client 100 which is mapped to R/3 client 600.
I know that this is custom table and not a SAP standard table. But I really don't understand why this would work in one client and not in the other client. I have checked the RFC destinations and also did some other initial downloads on CRD 200 which works fine except for this particular table.
Could you please give me your opinion on how can I debug this and find where is the problem? After doing few debugging myself I found out that I am getting the validation error in BDOC in CRD client 200 is because the intitial download is not bringing any record from R/3.
Due to this problem our contract pricing is not working on our DEV system and I am not able to do any further tests or enhancements.
Any suggestion or insight on this will be very helpful.
Thanks,
PrasoonHi Michael,
Thanks for your reply. I tried to debug the initial trasfer from CRM to R/3 but I am not able to debug the function in R/3. Also when I do a Test Function module in R/3 I am not sure as what correct parameter to put. I did refer few OSS notes 656823and 573857 but was not able to debug it in R/3. We are on CRM 3.0 Service Pack 14. Could you please suggest as to how can I debug this initial download ?
Since this initial load works perfectly fine in the other client(100) and not in in client 200, I am not sure what could be the problem.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Prasoon -
does any body know where can i get tables full name
cause in the db browser i get names like AACT.
i wanna get the full name like invoice order header
thanks for your helpHi, Achref zaidi!
Just check the "View->Debug Information" menu item in SAP. Move a mouse on the necessary field in the form, and you will see the table/field names on any form in the left down corner in the main SAP window. And the names will be "like AACT" It's the only names the tables have. -
Why a table full scan when I've got the PK in the WHERE clause?
There is a very complex query that I need to optimize in an Oracle 10gR2 environment. I am deconstructing it into layers to see what is causing the first bottleneck. The innermost portion is fine, with an explain plan cost of 54. With a typical value for the bind variable, it returns 125 zero_id values. There are over 100,000 rows in table T_ONE in my test database, but my customer has over one million rows in their production instance.
WITH t_merged_id AS (SELECT DISTINCT zero_id FROM t_zero WHERE NVL(column2, zero_id) = :i_id)
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_two
ON t_one.column1 = t_two.two_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_two.column10 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_two
ON t_one.column2 = t_two.two_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_two.column10 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_three
ON t_one.column3 = t_three.three_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_three.column10 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_four
ON t_one.column4 = t_four.four_id
INNER JOIN t_two
ON t_four.column1 = t_two.two_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_two.two_id = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one INNER JOIN t_merged_id ON t_one.column5 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one INNER JOIN t_merged_id ON t_one.column6 = t_merged_id.zero_idHowever, the next step is to obtain a bunch of columns from T_ONE for each of those ONE_ID values. Adding that looks like the following, which causes a table full scan on T_ONE (and an explain plan cost over 1,500 for this query in my test system) and it takes far too long to return the results.
SELECT t_one.*
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN
(--This is the start of the query shown above
WITH t_merged_id AS (SELECT DISTINCT zero_id FROM t_zero WHERE NVL(column2, zero_id) = :i_id)
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_two
ON t_one.column1 = t_two.two_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_two.column10 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_two
ON t_one.column2 = t_two.two_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_two.column10 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_three
ON t_one.column3 = t_three.three_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_three.column10 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one
INNER JOIN t_four
ON t_one.column4 = t_four.four_id
INNER JOIN t_two
ON t_four.column1 = t_two.two_id
INNER JOIN t_merged_id
ON t_two.two_id = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION ALL
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one INNER JOIN t_merged_id ON t_one.column5 = t_merged_id.zero_id
UNION
SELECT t_one.one_id
FROM t_one INNER JOIN t_merged_id ON t_one.column6 = t_merged_id.zero_id
--This is the end of the query shown above
) t_list
ON t_one.one_id = t_list.one_idMy question is, why wouldn’t Oracle use the existing index PK_T_ONE, which is keyed on T_ONE.ONE_ID? I tried refactoring the query using a “WHERE t_one.one_id IN” construct instead of the INNER JOIN but it didn’t make any difference. Neither did adding an index hint, which I hoped would force the use of the PK index.
Any ideas?I was able to completely resolve my problem, but I still want to understand why the original query wouldn't use an index.
(My solution was to move all the joins and where clauses from the query that wrapped the one we've been discussing and put them into each SELECT in the UNION, so there is no longer any inner subquery. So instead of trying to first get a list of ID values from the subquery, get the full records for the IDs from an outer query, and then joining to the outer query, I made SELECT in the UNION contain the full logic. This makes the query a lot more verbose, because all the joins and wheres are repeated six times, but it does use the index and returns in 0.04 seconds instead of over nine minutes in my test database.)
hoek wrote:
Values for optimizer_index_caching and optimizer_index_cost_adj are not the defaults. Any reasons for that?I am not a DBA and have no idea. However, I did a Google search and found this: http://decipherinfosys.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/optimizer_index_cost_adj-and-optimizer_index_caching/. Apparently Tom Kyte would approve more of our settings than the defaults.
hoek wrote:
Any chance to get a realistic dataset on your test server?Unfortunately, not for quite some time. The customer won't provide any real data, and generating data for testing is complex because of all the interrelationships. I have someone working on that. However, I was able to get back on the primary test server that has 136k records in the main table instead of only 2k. So far as I know, the Oracle configuration between the test server and the customer's server is the same. However, they have much more serious hardware that I do (more processors, more RAM, more platters). On the other hand, they have 10 times as much data.
hoek wrote:
Your second execution plan contains differents stats, they're not the 'common ones'. (E-rows etc.)The predicates are the same as the first. The 2nd plan was generated by the 10g-specific portion of Randolph's script using the command "select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null, null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));".
This is the result from running the script on the main test server:
NAME TYPE VALUE
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string OFF
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 95
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 10
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 32
db_block_size integer 8192
cursor_sharing string FORCE
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART 04-04-2008 07:02
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP 04-04-2008 07:02
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 646.57331
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR
SQL> SELECT st.*
2 FROM t_senttsk st INNER JOIN (WITH t_mrgdusr AS (SELECT DISTINCT usr_id
3 FROM t_usr
4 WHERE NVL(usr_mrgemstr, usr_id) = 10000002 /* i_payer_id */
5 )
6 SELECT t_senttsk.setk_id
7 FROM t_senttsk INNER JOIN t_mrgdusr
8 ON t_senttsk.setk_affn_memb = t_mrgdusr.usr_id
9 UNION
10 SELECT t_senttsk.setk_id
11 FROM t_senttsk INNER JOIN t_mrgdusr
12 ON t_senttsk.setk_ownr = t_mrgdusr.usr_id) t_affil
13 ON st.setk_id = t_affil.setk_id;
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:13:14.54
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1241660758
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 169K| 64M| 1403 (3)| 00:00:17 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 169K| 64M| 1403 (3)| 00:00:17 |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_SENTTSK | 136K| 51M| 1400 (3)| 00:00:17 |
| 3 | VIEW | | 1 | 6 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | | | | |
| 5 | LOAD AS SELECT | | | | | |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | T_USR | 1 | 8 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_NVL_USR_MRGEMSTR_USR_ID | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | SORT UNIQUE | | | | | |
| 9 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 25 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_SENTTSK | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_T_SENTTSK | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | VIEW | | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6608_399116CE | 1 | 6 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 22 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_SENTTSK | 1 | 9 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_T_SENTTSK | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | VIEW | | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6608_399116CE | 1 | 6 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
7 - access(NVL("USR_MRGEMSTR","USR_ID")=10000002)
12 - access("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_ID"="ST"."SETK_ID")
13 - filter("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_AFFN_MEMB"="T_MRGDUSR"."USR_ID")
16 - filter("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_OWNR" IS NOT NULL)
17 - access("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_ID"="ST"."SETK_ID")
18 - filter("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_OWNR"="T_MRGDUSR"."USR_ID")
Statistics
349 recursive calls
275041 db block gets
1239881 consistent gets
26 physical reads
52730252 redo size
3312 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
240 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
136835 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed
SQL> SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ st.*
2 FROM t_senttsk st INNER JOIN (WITH t_mrgdusr AS (SELECT DISTINCT usr_id
3 FROM t_usr
4 WHERE NVL(usr_mrgemstr, usr_id) = 10000002 /* i_payer_id */
5 )
6 SELECT t_senttsk.setk_id
7 FROM t_senttsk INNER JOIN t_mrgdusr
8 ON t_senttsk.setk_affn_memb = t_mrgdusr.usr_id
9 UNION
10 SELECT t_senttsk.setk_id
11 FROM t_senttsk INNER JOIN t_mrgdusr
12 ON t_senttsk.setk_ownr = t_mrgdusr.usr_id) t_affil
13 ON st.setk_id = t_affil.setk_id;
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:09:15.90
SQL>
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null, null, 'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 2rc9d2c83a7ak, child number 0
SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ st.* FROM t_senttsk st INNER JOIN (WITH t_mrgdusr AS (SELECT DISTINCT usr_id
FROM t_usr WHERE NVL(usr_mrgemstr, usr_id) = :"SYS_B_0"
/* i_payer_id */ )
SELECT t_senttsk.setk_id FROM t_senttsk INNER JOIN t_mrgdusr
ON t_senttsk.setk_affn_memb = t_mrgdusr.usr_id UNION SELECT
t_senttsk.setk_id FROM t_senttsk INNER JOIN t_mrgdusr ON
t_senttsk.setk_ownr = t_mrgdusr.usr_id) t_affil ON st.setk_id = t_affil.setk_id
Plan hash value: 1065206678
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 169K| 0 |00:09:02.47 | 1514K| | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_SENTTSK | 1 | 136K| 136K|00:00:01.64 | 7062 | | | |
| 3 | VIEW | | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:09:00.54 | 1507K| | | |
| 4 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | 136K| | 0 |00:09:00.12 | 1507K| | | |
| 5 | LOAD AS SELECT | | 136K| | 0 |00:08:24.31 | 548K| 1024 | 1024 | |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | T_USR | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:00:06.12 | 410K| | | |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_NVL_USR_MRGEMSTR_USR_ID | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:00:05.41 | 410K| | | |
| 8 | SORT UNIQUE | | 136K| | 0 |00:00:19.10 | 822K| 1024 | 1024 | |
| 9 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | 136K| | 0 |00:00:17.40 | 822K| | | |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:00:08.02 | 411K| | | |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_SENTTSK | 136K| 1 | 136K|00:00:06.36 | 411K| | | |
|* 12 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_T_SENTTSK | 136K| 1 | 136K|00:00:03.68 | 273K| | | |
|* 13 | VIEW | | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:00:01.03 | 0 | | | |
| 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6609_399116CE | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:00:00.67 | 0 | | | |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 136K| 1 | 0 |00:00:06.54 | 411K| | | |
|* 16 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_SENTTSK | 136K| 1 | 34256 |00:00:05.87 | 411K| | | |
|* 17 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_T_SENTTSK | 136K| 1 | 136K|00:00:03.46 | 273K| | | |
|* 18 | VIEW | | 34256 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.25 | 0 | | | |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6609_399116CE | 34256 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.16 | 0 | | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
7 - access("T_USR"."SYS_NC00127$"=:SYS_B_0)
12 - access("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_ID"="ST"."SETK_ID")
13 - filter("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_AFFN_MEMB"="T_MRGDUSR"."USR_ID")
16 - filter("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_OWNR" IS NOT NULL)
17 - access("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_ID"="ST"."SETK_ID")
18 - filter("T_SENTTSK"."SETK_OWNR"="T_MRGDUSR"."USR_ID")
hoek wrote:Does rewriting 'the heart of the issue' into like below make any difference?
select a.*
from foo a
where exists ( select null
from bar b
where a.foo_pk_id = b.foo_pk_id
and b.some_col = :bind_var
The UNION in the subquery seems to make that difficult. -
LIBTUX_CAT:582: ERROR: Unable to register, registry table full
When we tried to call one of our service 100 times parallely we got an error as :-
181936.547.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.3568042.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:582: ERROR: Unable to register, registry table full
182718.591.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.10432990.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:585: ERROR: Invalid registry table slot index passed, unable to unregister
Can somebody help us out why this error is coming.
The UBB configuration for same is as:-
MAXACCESSERS 350
MAXSERVERS 430
MAXSERVICES 1200
MAXGROUPS 100
MAXNETGROUPS 20
MAXMACHINES 256
MAXWSCLIENTS = 100
MAXACLCACHE = 10
MAXPENDINGBYTES = 100000
"TMMETADATA"
SRVGRP = "M_JOLT_GRP"
CLOPT = "-A -- -f /dev_app/dtux5/bin/reposfile"
RESTART= Y
SRVID = 1
GRACE = 3600
MAXGEN = 5
"GWWS"
SRVGRP = "M_JOLT_GRP"
CLOPT = "-A -- -iGWWS1"
RESTART= Y
SRVID = 2
The wsdf file is as
<Definition
xmlns="http://www.bea.com/Tuxedo/WSDF/2007"
name="EBATEST" wsdlNamespace="urn:salt.EBATEST.wsdl">
<WSBinding id="CURTEST_Binding">
<SOAP>
<AccessingPoints>
<Endpoint
address="http://10.16.114.145:7001/ebaapp" id="eba_HTTP_IN">
</Endpoint>
</AccessingPoints>
</SOAP>
<Servicegroup id="ebatestGrp">
<Service name="SCD_GET_TRD_UND"></Service>
</Servicegroup>
</WSBinding>
</Definition>
And salt file used for making saltconfig is as
<Deployment xmlns="http://www.bea.com/Tuxedo/SALTDEPLOY/2007">
<WSDF>
<Import location="/dev_app/dtux5/bin/example.wsdf"></Import>
</WSDF>
<WSGateway>
<GWInstance id="GWWS1">
<Inbound>
<Binding ref="EBATEST:CURTEST_Binding">
<Endpoint use="eba_HTTP_IN"></Endpoint>
</Binding>
</Inbound>
<Properties>
<Property name="enableSOAPValidation" value="true"/>
</Properties>
</GWInstance>
</WSGateway>
<System></System>
</Deployment>
The trace file as generated is as :-
184541.717.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184541.717.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184541.717.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184541.718.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184541.722.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281396]
184541.723.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x1: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184541.727.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_errlog.11956518.1.0: User id :mamu2:
184541.727.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_errlog.11956518.1.0: Sssn id :281396:
184541.727.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_errlog.11956518.1.0: Business id :B21001:
184541.727.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_errlog.11956518.1.0: Business msg :Invalid User:The Login Id entered is not valid
184541.727.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_errlog.11956518.1.0: Service Name :SVC_SESSION
184541.727.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: No Data in Session table for :mamu2:, :281396:
184541.728.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: GWWS_CAT:21: WARNING: Tuxedo service returns TPFAIL.
184541.729.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184700.521.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184700.521.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184700.521.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184700.522.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184700.522.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184700.523.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x2: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184700.524.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x2: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184700.538.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184700.538.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.691.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.691.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.691.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.692.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.693.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x3: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.694.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x3: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.710.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.711.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.718.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.718.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.718.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.718.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.718.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.719.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x4: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.719.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x4: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.732.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.732.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.738.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.738.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.739.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.739.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.739.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.739.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x5: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.740.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x5: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.756.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.756.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.769.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.769.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.769.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.769.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.770.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.770.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x6: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.771.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x6: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.798.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.799.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.807.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.807.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.807.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.807.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.807.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.808.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x7: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.808.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x7: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.821.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.821.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.831.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.831.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.831.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.831.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.831.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.832.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x8: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.832.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x8: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.843.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.843.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.855.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.855.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.855.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.855.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.856.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.856.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x9: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.857.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af x9: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.869.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.869.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.876.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.876.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.876.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.876.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.876.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.877.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xa: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.877.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xa: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.899.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.899.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1291.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.906.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.906.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.906.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.907.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.907.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.907.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xb: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.908.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xb: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.918.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.919.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.932.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.932.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.932.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.932.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.932.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.933.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xc: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.933.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xc: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.945.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.945.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1034.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.957.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.957.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.957.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.957.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.957.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
184707.958.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xd: SESSION: TIMEOUT VALUE IS [9999]:
184707.958.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: gtrid x0 x4f1968af xd: SESSION: SESSION [281397] IS VALID:
184707.973.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: LIBTUX_CAT:585: ERROR: Invalid registry table slot index passed, unable to unregister
184707.973.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Got a message from Tuxedo, SCO index=4095
184707.973.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1548.0: TRACE:ms:Send a http message to net, SCO index=4095
184707.980.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A HTTP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.980.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:A SOAP message is received, SCO index=4095
184707.980.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.777.0: TRACE:ms:Begin data transformation of request message, buffer type = FML32, SCO index=4095
184707.980.MLXWTAIXDEV!GWWS.2277636.1.0: TRACE:ms:Delivering a message to Tuxedo, service name =SCD_GET_TRD_UND, SCO index=4095
184707.980.MLXWTAIXDEV!svr_session.11043070.1.0: SESS: INPUT IS [mamu2] : [281397]
Regards,
AnuragHi,
From the Tuxedo documentation, LIBTUX_CAT:582 is described as follows along with a recommended action.
>
582
ERROR: Unable to register, registry table full
Description
The BEA TUXEDO system was attempting to find a registry table slot for a process, but the registry table was full.
Action
Increase the MAXACCESSERS parameter in the UBBCONFIG file, rebuild the TUXCONFIG file, then reboot the application and try again.
>
So try increassing MAXACCESSERS and see if your problem goes away.
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect -
...but when I fill a table with merge fields, it ends up creating multiple entries for the same address, rather than one table full of each address. Please help.
Thanks!That is a quirk of Pagesthat it applies only one record per page.
There is a way around this:
http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewtopic.php?t=245&highlight=labels &mforum=iworktipsntrick
Peter -
Can you please help me with this query,
The explain plan is showing 'Table full access' on
Pay_cost_allocation_keyflex table.
I have 4 variables which are passed to the pcak table to get the pcak.cost_allocation_keyflex_id
I tried various ways, except when i give specific hrou.name = 'Xyz' then it does not do full access.
I even tried creating index on seg1,seg2,seg3,seg4 column, still it shows full access.
any idea how can i avoid doing full access as this is taking long time to fetch the record for 5k records.
sELECT
HROU.NAME,
HROU.ATTRIBUTE10||HROU.ATTRIBUTE11||HROU.ATTRIBUTE12||HROU.ATTRIBUTE13
FROM
HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS HROU,
PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX PCAK
WHERE
&VV_PAYROLL_ACTION_ID and
HROU.Organization_id and
HROU.COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX_ID = PCAK.COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX_ID AND
PCAK.SEGMENT1 = &P_REC_SEGMENT1 AND
pcak.segment2 = &p_rec_segment2 and
nvl(pcak.segment4,'00000') = nvl(&p_rec_segment4,'00000') and
nvl(pcak.segment5,'00000') = nvl(&P_rec_segment5,'00000') --and
GROUP BY hrou.name,hrou.attribute10,hrou.attribute11,hrou.attribute12,hrou.attribute13
order by hrou.attribute10,hrou.attribute11,hrou.attribute12,hrou.attribute13
Any advise will be appreciated.
ThanksBashir,
Try to avoid using function in the where block. If functions are used then normal indexes are not used .. (nvl for pcak.segment4 and pcak.segment5)
If you "have" to use nvl function, then create function-based index for pcak.segment4 and pcak.segment5
As for hrou.name, there must be an index for this. And thats why when you give hrou.name ='xyz', query must be using one of the index that has this column.
Sudhanshu Bhandari
perotsystems TSI -
BAPI step by step Using CATSDB table full point if useful
BAPI step by step Using CATSDB table to folder
full point if usefulHi,
"Steps for Creating a BAPI:
1) Create a Function Module in SE37 and assign it to an active Function Group.
(Check Remote Enable in attributes section)
2) Fill the Import (Input) Parameters for the RFC
3) Fill the Export (Output) Parameters
(BAPIRETURN IS MANDATORY)
4) Fill the Table parameters, if any
5) Write the functionality in the source code
6) Activate and Release the Function Module"
Thanks
Srinu -
Hi ,
I have created a contract in R/3 and i am not sure which table it gets stored in SRM...In R/3 it stores in EKKO table but where does it store in SRM i mean table name.
Regards
SameerMohammad,
CRMD_ORDERADM_H and CRMD_ORDERADM_H tables stores the Header and Item level information of SRM Application Documents. Object TYpe will differentiate the same for Contracts.
For other data in the Contracts like Account Assignment, BE Document etc, Go to BBP_PD transaction , open any document in that transaction , go to various sections at header and item level and all the details of the Contract will be displayed in various sections for different Contracts.
I hope that solves your purpose
Regards
Virender Singh -
I have recently finished up on my contract, paid full month - need refund?
Hi, I have recently finished up my contact - bill paid 25th of May at full price for a month in advance - contract ended 7th of June - therefore I believe i'm due a refund of approximately half my bill payment? I received no contact from meteor and would appreciate a speedy refund? Kind Regards,Adam
Hi Adam,
When the final statement is issued any refunds due to you would appear on this. Once you receive this we can then issue a refund to your bank account if you are due one. Just get back in touch with us here.
Thanks,
Sarah -
Match revenue recognised(Unbilled) & Invoice raised-for a contract-Table
Hi
In case of ubilled amount posted for a contrat and then the invoice being raised,the unbilled amount i.e revenue recognition is stored in VBREVE table and the invoice is identified against the contract number in VBREVR or VBRP.Is there any field or table where we can find that the for the revenue recognised ,the specific invoice number is raised .Can any one pls reply on this.
-
We are a UK South-West based LabVIEW consultancy company looking for a LabVIEW programmer preferably with advanced signal analysis and processing skills, to become part of the team or work as a short term contractor. We will be looking to advance their skills through a range of different projects that we work on, from aerospace test and measurement, through to shop floor data collection and User Interface marketing.
Must have at least two years experience in LabVIEW and have an electronic engineering based degree or be able to show signal analysis is an area of expertise. We are looking to fill the position as soon as possible.
Please your CV’s to the below address.
[email protected]If the candidate had all the correct attributes then it could indeed be an option.
Regards
Peter -
Cannot export data to XL - "COS document table full" Error
I am trying to export about 270 records from a PDF dataset to a CSV file, but I can only export about 126 of them.
What is the work around that will allow me to do this?This is a very disappointing system flaw. I had to chop my file into four parts and then export each part and then stitch it back together. I also had to clear out all my temp files after each of the four exports. Acrobat presented a lot of problems. Too many people wrote back and said they could not submit or fill out the forms. Adobe needs to make this system work easily for all past versions of Acrobat if they expect people to use it.
Here are the instructions on how I cleared the temp files.
Acrobat would not export all the data at one time. The dataset document had to be chopped into four smaller parts in order to make it small enough to export. This was accomplished by making four copies of the form, then deleting all of the data for a range of the responses (e.g. delete last names that start with F-Z). Even after this, it was still necessary to clear all temporary files on the user's computer after each of the four copies of the file was exported. That process consisted of: Click Start, Run, then type "temp" and clear all the files from the folder that comes up, AND type "%tmp%", and clear all the files that come up from that search. -
Process table full up with ssh_agent processes created by Terminal
Every time I start a new shell using Terminal, a new ssh_agent process is started. (It's PID is not stored in the environment variable SSHAGENTPID.) The problem is that this ssh_agent process lives on after the shell process completes.
Over time, as more new shells are started, the number of ssh_agent processes grows and grows. Eventually no new shell can be started. The following error is given:
login: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
Some (but not all) applications will not start either (e.g. Cisco VPN Client).
The ssh_agent processes must be manually killed to rectify things without logging out.
What is wrong? Is this a known bug? How do I fix this?Mystery solved.
I was confused because it seemed that one of my own or the standard login scripts must have been running ssh-agent every time, but I don't have a .bashrc nor a .bash_profile, and I have never changed the bash shell startup files. I have put some aliases into .bash_login, but I couldn't see how an alias command could be the culprit.
But after sleeping on it I went back and had a look at my .bash_profile aliases. There is one which read:
alias nopwd="eval $(ssh-agent) ssh-add"
which I had come up with because
eval `ssh-agent` ssh-add
cannot be put in an alias as written. It was only meant to be invoked manually, when and if required. However actually when this alias command in the .bash_login was parsed, it executed ssh-agent (resulting in an orphan process), rather than waiting until I typed nopwd. One reason I didn't realize my mistake earlier was because I was not asked for a passphrase - the ssh-add was not being executed.
BTW, typing
alias nopwd
didn't give
alias nopwd="eval $(ssh-agent) ssh-add"
rather it gave
alias nopwd='eval SSHAUTHSOCK=/tmp/ssh-h3nkOu3nb7/agent.1538; export
SSHAUTHSOCK;
SSHAGENTPID=1539; export SSHAGENTPID;
echo Agent pid 1539; ssh-add'
and typing nopwd during the shell worked fine as I had intended it to.
So, mystery solved. I've changed the alias to:
alias nopwd="eval \`ssh-agent\` ssh-add"
which works as intended, and no more ssh-agents popping up when I start a new shell. I could use a .bash_profile script to reuse an existing ssh-agent process, but I think I might start using SSHKeychain instead.
Maybe you are looking for
-
FIDCC2 parking document workflow
Hi All I have one requirement regarding parking document workflow: We're using FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc to post the vendor invoices. As per our requirement, the incoming document should not be posted. Instead it should park. Upto this point we are success
-
IDM 6 : Authorization Type in Rules
Hi, With IDM 6, I am getting the following error while accessing a anonymous user task which uses custom rules as well as out of the box rules such as Regional Constants. ERROR: View access denied to Subject Reset on Configuration: Custom Alpha Numer
-
I'm attempting to address some performance issues by using list partitioning (10g running on Windows Server 2003). As an experiment I created two small tables (~1000 rows) of vehicle maintenance data, one with no partitions the other partitioned by v
-
Unable to display Flowtrace due to exception while initializing object.
Hi, Getting below error while trying to view the trace of BPEL process in 11g. Any suggestions. Unable to display Flowtrace due to exception while initializing object, please review logs for detailed information Exception occured while retrieving the
-
Unlocked iPhone 5 doesn't work
Hello! My friend bought me an iPhone 5 sim free 2 weeks ago. But now I can't use it, because it seems locked for AT&T. What should I do know? Can apple store stuff check how my iPhone was sell?