Is Aperture 3 enabled for hyper-threading?

That would make the difference betweening getting a Mac with a Core i7 processor.

There is a big difference between multicore and hyper-threading.
Basically you have three technologies, multiprocessor, multicore and hyper-threading. The first two give you multiple physical hardware. In the case of the first, multiprocessor, you get multiple independent CPU's. In the second, multicore, you get multiple processing units on a single chip.
In the third case, hyper-threading,  each processor gets a logical 'twin'. That each each physical processors pretends to be two processors.
So that's the hardware. From a software perspective you have multi-tasking  multu-processing and multi-threading.
Multi-tasking is the illusion that many things are happening at once on a single core system. Its been around since the late 60's usually called a time sharing systems. The OS switches between tasks loading one in as it unloads another. Happens fast enough so that it appears that things are happening at the same time but they are not.
Multi-processing is multi-tasking but on a system with multiple cores (or cpus). Each core gets a program and can run simultaneously. OS X was designed for this from the beginning using SMP (symmetric multiprocessing). So each application you are running gets its own core
Multi-threading is multi-tasking within a single application. Again OS X is designed for this. Applications create threads and then the OS can run those threads on an available core. Of course it doesn't always make sense to do this. If the application needs a calculation to finish before it can proceed nothing is gained by running the calculation on a separate core.
Aperture makes use of a lot of the technology in the system. Which will give you the biggest performance hit is hard to say. I still haven't seen any real world benchmarks on Aperture.  Maany users here have there own stories and will swear by the solutions they have decided on.
The GPU is important. Aperture uses the Core Imaging Technology and the best GPU you can get for your system is a plus. However Core Imaging is also setup to make use of the fastest execution path available. So if you;re doing something that he CPU can do faster then the GPU it will go that route. And in that case having extra cores lying around would be a plus.
So to answer your intended question, does Aperture make use of multi-threading (not hyper-threading). The answer is yes. Does it make a tremendous difference, that depends on your definition of tremendous. You'll never get twice the performance when running on two cores that much I can say for sure.

Similar Messages

  • Can't get Hyper-Threading to work on MS-6788

    Hi,
    I have just purchased a MS-6788 motherboard which I am using in conjuction with a P4 2.8Ghz. I installed Windows XP on to the computer and noticed that the OS can't see hyper-threading. I checked the BIOS and in the section 'Advanced BIOS Features' there isnt the option for 'Hyper Threading Function'. Do you know why this is?
    Cheers,
    Dan

    Sorry to be the bringer of bad tidings but ... The only Socket 478 P4 533mhz that does Hyperthreading is the 3.06. All the other Socket 478 P4 HT processors are the 800mhz flavour.
    For confirmation by Intel themselves, see http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL6PF and note that under "Supported Features" there is nothing. Also check the 800mhz version of the 2.8 at e.g., http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL79K and you will see Hyper-Threading Technology under "Supported Features".
    HTH, Ray

  • Is Hyper-threading enabled on the i5 and i7 iMacs

    I am interested in upgrading to a 27" i5 or i7. According to intels site all i-core processors support Hyper-threading. At work I use a quad core Xeon on a HP computer with Windows 7. The system reports that I have 8 cores in performance monitor as it sees each core as 2 cores with Hyper-threading enabled in the Bios.
    Does Apple enable hyper-theading in EFI and does Mac OSX see 8 cores in the activity monitor and correctly show the activity of each thread? I suspect if it only shows 4 cores that hyper-threading is not activated on the iMacs. I want to get the most out of the processors capabilities since I am paying a premium for it and so I wont get a current generation machine if it is crippling the processors ability to run 2 threads per core as intel advertises. I would expect with Grand Central in 10.6 that hyper-threading would dramatically increase performance.
    Can someone answer this question definitively?

    Intels site states clearly that the i3 i5 and i7 all support hyper threading.. if only the i7 supports it on the iMac then apple is crippling the chip..
    http://www.intel.com/products/processor/corei5/index.htm
    http://www.intel.com/products/processor/corei3/index.htm
    So is apple crippling the chip????

  • Once and for all: Hyper-threading, turbo boost on Core i5 MBA?

    Hey, all.
    There is a lot of conflicting information on whether the new Core i5 MacBook Airs (as opposed to the upgraded Core i7 options) support hyper-threading. As best I can gather, there is still no "official" Apple statement on the subject. I thought I'd gin up another conversation in the event someone has more definitive information. In case anyone wants a fresh bit of provocation, earlier today I asked one of Apple's online "Live Chat" experts. Here's what she said:
    The Core i7 offers Triple Channel memory, hyper-threading, and full dual 16x video bandwidth.
    But the i5 doesn't offer the TurboBoost or hyperthreading.
    You would have to do the upgrade to the i7 for that.
    Agree? Disagree?

    Here is a comparison of the three processors used for the 2011 MBA.
    It would appear that the i5 does have Turbo Boost (and Hyperthreading), unless Apple's specification calls for disabling TB.
    But, if we look at some of the benchmark testing, the results would seem to imply that the specification only differs by the differences shown in these charts, hence Turbo Boost would be evident across all the Airs.

  • Connect via RDP option is not enabled for some VM's on the same Hyper-V Host

    Hi. I have many virtual machines on a Hyper-V host being managed via System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012.  When you right click on a virtual machine - Connect or View - Connect via Console is enabled, but Connect via RDP is not enabled for
    most but not all of the machines.  Is there a setting on the Hyper-V host that I need to modify to enable Connect via RDP for all of my VM's?  All of the virtual machines have the same configuration meaning that Remote Desktop is enabled for all
    of them on the OS itself.

    Hi Debabrata,
    In App Controller the console access is provided by an ActiveX control and this requires the client (web browser) to connect directly to the Hyper-V server. As you note, for this to work over the internet would require the Hyper-V host to be accessible from
    the internet, and this is not a recommended security practice. 
    Publishing App Controller as a Remote App avoids needing to make the Hyper-V host accessible to the internet. I'm not an expert in setting up Remote App and don't have an answer about how to avoid doing 2 lots of authentication. The
    Remote Desktop Services forum is likely to be a better place to ask a question on setting up Remote Apps.
    Let me know what you need help with for the Remote Console in Windows Azure Pack option. There is also a forum for
    Azure Pack and two of our MVPs who do have console connect working have both written articles that describe their experience.
    http://kristiannese.blogspot.com/2014/02/configuring-remote-console-for-windows.html
    http://www.hyper-v.nu/archives/mvaneijk/2014/01/windows-azure-pack-remote-console-with-the-rd-gateway-in-a-dmz/
    Regards,
    Richard
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • Hyper v enabled for macbook pro

    Ive heard that Bootcamp doesnt allow for Hyper-V to be enabled in its bios althought the CPU supports it. Is there a workaround for this avaliable?
    I bought the Macbook Pro 15" Oct 2013 edition hardware with the intention of virtualizing in Windows 8.1 Pro and doing labs for certification.
    Thanks
    Jude

    Did you try to boot in osx - install all the latest updates for your software and then reboot in windows and try to install hyper-v again?

  • Unable to use more than one processor group for my threads in a C# app

    Hi,
    I set my .Net 4.5 (or 4.5.1) App.Config to:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <configuration>
    <runtime>
    <Thread_UseAllCpuGroups enabled="true"></Thread_UseAllCpuGroups>
    <GCCpuGroup enabled="true"></GCCpuGroup>
    <gcServer enabled="true"></gcServer>
    </runtime>
    <startup>
    <supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.5.1"/>
    </startup>
    </configuration>
    I run my app on a windows server 2012 with a NUMA architecture: 2 x [cpu Xeon E5-2697 v3 at 14 cores each with Hyper Thread activated] => 2 x 14 x 2 = 56 Logical Processors.
    This is TaskManager screenshot:
    My app start 80 threads either from "Thread Class" or "Parallel.For" and in both case it only takes 28 Logical Processors, all from the same Processor Group.
    According to MSDN documentation
    and
    Stephen Toub answer, it should use every Logical Processor of every Processor Group.
    Why does the Task scheduler assign my threads on only one Processor Group?
    I also reported this question to
    StackOverflow which have a lot more information.
    Eric Ouellet

    One thing before all, is that I suggest that you think through your security model before implementing it in UCM. You should ask yourself questions like :
    - Is security really based on department ?
    - Why two departments need to have access to the same category of document ?
    - Is it really security that I need or classification ? Is it a problem if Accouting have access to Finance or you just don't want Marketing documents in a finance related search ?
    - Maybe what you want is that finance guys to have access to marketing document.
    Without a clear business security model, it's hard to find a UCM security model as it is impossible to associate 2 security groups to one document.

  • Z77a-gd65 supports hyper-threading?

    I have seen in some sites in Internet that the z77a-gd65 supports hyper-threading, but there is no mention of it in the MSI official site nor any BIOS option to enable and disable hyper-threading is described in the manual 
    Do you guys know whether multi-threading is supported or not?
    Thank you very much in advance for your reply!

    Thanks Froggy Gremlin for your reply.
    There is no shot of this subsection. In page 2-10 there is a shot of the "OC Section" and in page 2-15 a reference to a read only CPU specification sub-menu, but no reference to the HT-setting at all. Maybe I am reading an outdated manual, but it is the one from the official MSI site at //download2.msi.com/files/downloads/mnu_exe/E7751v2.2.zip
    But if you have the mainboard and you know there is this option, I trust your word. I am probably buying it but wanted to know before if this option was available.

  • Oracle Linux 6.2 - hyper-threading

    Hello
    two simple questions, I hope 8^)
    if I installed OL 6.2 and then also upgraded to UEK R2, on X64 Intel server - both tasks done with hyper-threading enabled and then I want to disable hyper-threading after OS installation - do I need to make any OS system/parameter changes at Linux OS level or simply turn off H/T at hardware level and reboot the server ?
    is there general recommendation re when H/T is beneficial on Oracle Linux with UEK ?
    what about if I added more RAM to the same 64-bit Intel server? Any Linux OS changes required to get all RAM recognised by OS ?
    thanks!

    A recommendation does not mean the absolute best solution for every situation. There has been no information about any particular software deployment or even the particular CPU in question.
    I agree with you that enabling or disabling HTT in regard to achieving the best possible performance for a particular scenario is subject to testing. But, if someone asks me what is the recommendation about HTT in regard to Oracle UEK kernel, and possibly Oracle RDBMS, my suggestion is to use the default and leave HTT enabled. I'm not aware of any documentation that suggest to generally disable HTT when using Oracle. Saying "it depends" is scientifically correct, but not helpful.
    There are already plenty of discussions about HTT on the net. You can turn HTT off and experience a performance increase, but there is also a chance the performance was even better with HTT enabled in a properly configured system or application. There are cases were HTT apparently slows down performance, but drawing a conclusion about enabling or disabling HTT in regard to performance is often too simple due to many other factors that can interfere with the results.
    Dude the link you supplied referenced some old ibm information.Well, Hyper-Threading isn't a new feature.
    For what it's worth, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper-threading in particular "Drawback history".
    Or http://www.intel.com/support/processors/pentium4/sb/cs-017371.htm#1c which also links to more performance info.

  • 845PE Max2 & Hyper Threading in BIOS?

    Hi all.
    I know i dont have a Hyper Threading CPU
    but i dont have the option in my BIOS,why?
    Im using the latest bios v1.2.
    Shouldnt it be an option for it,like the manual says?

    MSI 845PE max2 (MS-6704) bios 1.2
    has HT-function enable/disable in
    in Advanced bios features -menu.
    It may require DDR333 , bur I'm not sure.
    It's different thing, when you enables it without 3,06 GHz cpu, works it or not. Maybe not...
    Quote
    Originally posted by preducer
    there is no option on HT in the bios.... so how am i supposed to know whether the hyper-threading is functioning...  :(

  • Unable to detect Hyper Threading of CPU SL6WE 3.2 in MSI-865PE Neo2

    Hi! I am new to this forum and need some help. I have just installed a  Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Northwood SL6WE 478 800MHz/512k . I bought this on e-bay and understand that this cpu supports hyper threading. I have enabled hyper threading in the bios, but only see one cpu in Widows System Properties and only one cpu in Windows Task Manager. I had a 2.6 cpu installed previously, no hyper threading. My motherboard is an MSI-865PE Neo2 version 1.1, 2GB Ram ( 4x512 ?), Thermaltke TR2-430W power supply, Freezer 4 Arctic Cooler, Nvidia GeForce 6600, LG DVD RAM burner, 16x DVD ROM, WD 250 gig and an Hitachi 80 gig hard drive. I also used Arctic Silver 5 thermal paste (after using Arcticclean and Surface Purifier). Have I missed somethig? Would appreciate help in solving why I have no hyper threading.

    200 7-3-3-2.5 Ultra Turbo and 212 5-3-3-2.5 Ultra Turbo is a
    no boot. Thinks ultra-turbo tries to set mem timings to
    2-2-2-5 below 218FSB and my memory can't do that.
    Turbo boots ok. Normal setting disabled PAT.
    200 2.5-3-3-7 Turbo PAT on    4.6GB/s
    200 2.5-3-3-7 Normal PAT off  4.2GB/s
    212 2.5-3-3-5 Turbo PAT on    4.8GB/s
    212 2.5-3-3-5 Normal Pat off   4.5GB/s
    Also tried 250 1:1, not prime95 stable
    250 2.5-3-3-7 Ultra-turbo        6GB/s
    I think pat is disabled above 218FSB on
    1:1 and 5:4 setting, but not on 4:5 setting.
    You should get close to or above 6GB/s at
    1:1 250 3-3-3-5 bios overclocking.
    Maybe something is running in the background
    stealing cpu power or something?
    Well, you have to test some more, maybe a
    fresh windows setup will help?

  • Intel HT (Hyper-Threading) BIOS 1.9?

    Sup People!  
     My Intel HT (Hyper-Threading) don't work right now, what to do?
     I was told that I need the new BIOS 1.9 for HT to work?
     I have: Intel P4c with HT
                Intel 875P with HT
                MS Windows XP Professional Version 2002 & SP 1
     There is no option button in the BIOS 1.8 for HT!
     What do I need to do? Please Help  
     TaZ   ...
     Also I have a new OVER CLOCK speed! MY 875P NEO @3420MHz/1140MHz FSB !!
     It's a old thread so look at post #7
     http://www.msi.com.tw/program/service/forum/index.php?sid=&postid=188033#post188033
      TaZ

    Sup & THX people for all the INFO!  
     Hay Schiers,
     "I can switch it on and off like I want. The option to allow/disallow it is about
    MP (advanced settings) and the version to support."
     I have a Intel SL6Z3 Pentium 4c 2.4GHz 800MHz FSB with HT. This new chip come's with the NEW MO core stepping. (Costa Rica) Now Im trying to over clock this Vcore 1.70v CPU to 275MHz FSB (3.3GHz/1.1GHz FSB) 5:4 ratio, Ram 2.70v DDR440 - 220MHz @CL2.0-3-3-7-8 with my PC3500, AND WITH HT (HYPER-THREADING)
     Right now my Vcore 1.60v CPU and 225MHz FSB @(2.7GHz/900MHz FSB) 1:1 ratio Ram 2.70v DDR450 - 225MHz @CL2.5-3-3-7-8 and NO HT (Hyper-Threading) On Intel STOCK Air.
    I have also tryed Vcore 1.6 CPU and 260MHz FSB @(3.12GHz/1.04GHz FSB) 5:4 ratio, RAM 2.60v DDR416 - 208MHz @CL2.0-3-3-6-8 and NO HT (Hyper-Threading) On Intel STOCK Air.
    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/service/forum/index.php?threadid=32697&sid=
     PLEASE HELP ME! GET HT (Hyper-Threading) WORKING!
     Please show how to do it step by step please
     I have BIOS 1.8  (Bugy) Need Bios 1.9 for new microcode update to get HT properly recognized with an option!
    OR IS THERE ANOTHER OPTION?  
      TaZ

  • How to get low performances alert for Hyper-v Host ON scom

    Hello Expert,
    We have to implement a scenario VM Live migration which involved (SCOM,SCVMM,SCORCH Parts).
    where SCOM parts  will monitor the performances of SCVMM 's Hyper-V hosts and VMs running the within the Hyper-v hosts.
    when the VMs utilization exceed the threshold and then scom monitor checks the performances of Running Hyper-v Hosts ,then using SCORCH automation ,VMs are moved to one of the best performances the Hyper-v hosts.
    To implement this ,I have integrated SCOM 2012 R2 AND SCVMM 2012 R2 AND enabled the PRO Tips.
    but don't know how to get alerts and configured related to performances of VMs and Hyper-v host.
    What will be next  needed to achieved this from SCOM PARTS.
    Thanks and Regards
    RICHA KM 

    Hi,
    In addition, hope the management pack for Hyper-v 2012 can be helpful for you, please download and import it to your management group:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36438
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Regards, Yan Li

  • ACL is not enabled for this user  OSX 10.5

    I am running OS X 10.5 on a Mini Mac.
    It was a clean install, everything went smoothly except for configuring the mail server.
    I created my users as I normally do using Workgroup manager.
    However 2 out of 3 of users I created can not log into the IMAP server.
    You get the error message ACL is not enabled for this user.
    What is the ACL and how do I enable it ?
    Thanks
    Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22604]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: friverr. service ACL is not enabled for this user
    Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22607]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: herbs. service ACL is not enabled for this user
    Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22607]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: friverr. service ACL is not enabled for this user
    Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22604]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: herbs. service ACL is not enabled for this user

    Hi there
    I had the same problem and I found this post which fixed it:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1244694&tstart=0
    Hope it works for you too!
    Chris

  • Is Aperture the tool for me?

    Afternoon all,
    Following on from a separate forum thread I've got here in iPhoto https://discussions.apple.com/message/20902055?ac_cid=op123456#20902055?ac_cid=o p123456, I wondered whether the Aperture thread could also help me out.
    I'm looking to have a single product to use as a central catalogue and referencing tool for the 000s of photos I've already got but also the 000s yet to be taken. I'm intending to have these photos stored on a NAS with appropriate backup measures, but accessing them through this as yet unknown product through wi-fi. I'm likely to do minimal photo manipulation other than the basics and enjoy the features of iPhoto so the main benefit is the ability to reference the images from a networked location. TD has kindly advised that iPhoto isnt the right product due to various limits due to networking.
    My question is simple: Is Aperture the tool for me?
    I look forward to hearing from you.
    Tim

    If you read TD's answer carefully, it says
    It cannot have the Library on a networked location, such as a NAS. iPhoto needs to have the Library sitting on disk formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled). Users with the Library sitting on disks otherwise formatted regularly report issues including, but not limited to, importing, saving edits and sharing the photos.
    The main problem is the formatting of the drive - for Aperture holds the same: The library needs to be on a disk formatted MacOS X Extended. Otherwise you are risking inconsistencies in your Aperture library  and open a can of worms, see:
    Use locally mounted Mac OS X Extended volumes for your Aperture library
    If you absolutey want to store your Photolibrary on a NAS, you can create a writable diskimage formatted MacOS X extended on your NAS and store the library on this disk image. You will have to take care to automount the diskimage before you access Aperture. This will be tedious and slow.
    The question, if you can put your Aperture library on a network volume is open to a debate, but I would not do it.
    For a good performance the access to the Aperture library needs to be very fast - I'd put the library on the fastest drive you have, with a very fast port, Thunderbolt, for example. My library sits on a second internal drive.
    Your network needs to be very stable, if you want reliable database transactions for your Aperture library.
    2. While you can run iPhoto in Referenced mode, with the Masters on a NAS and the library on a local disk, this is inherently unreliable. Here has more:
    This is better in Aperture. Other than iPhoto Aperture has built-in tools to deal with referenced original files. So you can move the bulk of your image files to an external volume and keep only the Aperture library on your internal volume.
    Regards
    Léonie

Maybe you are looking for