Is Appoval Process for Standard Target possible in 11.1.2.1

Hi All,
We are testing Workflow Approval process in 11.1.2.1
The idea is to get a Free Flow approval process to work for a Standard Target Version member.
So, we created 2 members in the Version dimension;
1) Working - Standard Target
2) BU_Ver - Bottom up
After assigning access to respective users in entity, scenario and version dimensions;
and defining the planning unit, when I try to do Scenario and Version Assignment
I can only see the Scenario members and for Version selection the Bottom up (BU_Ver) member.
The Standard Target member (*Working*) does not appear in the drop down.
My questions is;
1) Is it possible to implement a free form workflow using Standard Target.
Please help !!
Thanks in advance.
KD

I have similar situation with my client and I had below post few days back. I was hoping to get some feed back.
Process management vs target vesrion
If the purpose is to know who is signing off and not to control read/write access during the approvals and rejections I am thinking of trying above post. I still need to test that and see if I am missing anything.
Distributed budgeting: Oracle doc:
After the data is collected at the lower levels, the budget is submitted through the process management approval process. After all the budgets are submitted, >the top budget group owner reviews, approves, and loads the budgets for budgetary control, transaction control, and reporting.I think Oracle meant to copy data from 'target' to 'bottom-up' version before enabling process management (I donno what makes the difference of using distributed/free-form option during planning unit creation), it is still not clear enough for me.
Enabling 'bottom-up' forecast for detail level sales forecast is practically not an easy process and I may have to push back the scope on 'process management'
Thanks

Similar Messages

Process Management for Standard Target Version

Hi All,
I am newbie to hyperion, I am entering values at parent level by taking version type as "Standard Target", Is this possible to create Process Management for "Standard Target" versions? if yes how? Plz help me.
Regards,
Naresh R

I take it you are talking about planning, process management is for "Bottom Up Versions"
From the docs
"Target versions use top-down budgeting. *Manage Process Tasks are not allowed*, and children of target members must be blank (for example, #MISSING) to enable data input at the top level."
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Batch process for Web & Devices possible??

Hiya,
Here's what I have going on. I'm heavily involved with the DAZ3D community. Over a year ago I create a huge and I mean huge texture pack for the Windy Wizard Robe and the Morphing Fantasy Robe found at Renderosity. The pack, when zipped up is a whopping 333 Mb's. I was hoping to get that file size cut in half. I would do it one at a time but heck there are 151 texture maps in the pack. That's really not seeming like something I want to do if I can avoid it.
Is there a way to batch process using the Save for Web & Devices command?? It's settings are already set up to where I like them as I've completed a couple more packs and exported using that. It complains since the size of the texture maps are usually around 3000 X 3000 but it still works perfectly and it really does cut the size, actually, by about 2/3rds! Crazy but I really can't tell the difference when I compare a regularly saved map with one that's exported using that command. It's pretty amazing.
Thanks for the help!
Richard ;-)~

Quality level is just the degree of compression. 12 is max quality (minimum compression). Depending on how media is viewed one might not tell the difference between level 10 and 5. Save for web uses the same dialog.
This also is same dialog you get if you "save as" in jpeg. Try a couple of different levels and see what the results are, and what satisfies your needs.

Source of xslt mapping and XSD/ XMT target structures for standard Idocs

Hi,
I am working on R/3 - XI - ICH scenario. I need xslt mapping and XSD/ XML target structures for standard IDoc like PROACT01,DELFOR01, DELVRY03. I tried to search it on marketplace but couldn't find it there. As per configuration document, these things are shipped with XI mapping content in live cache CD. But I don't have this CD with me. Can anybody tell me the source for these target structures and mapping program. ( Please share marketplace, site link or send me across the mail [email protected])
Thank you in advance.
Anand More.

Anand the other option is to import the corresponding idocs into your integration repository and then you can view the generated XSD there.
As regards XSLT mapping, you need to basically first identify as to what form you want to transform your source idoc into.
For some help on XSLT mapping check the following threads,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/collaboration.sdn?contenttype=url&content=https%3A//forums.sdn.sap.com/topusers.jspa%3FforumID%3D44
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/collaboration.sdn?node=linkFnode1-6&contenttype=url&content=https://Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
Also have a look at my code samples,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-code-samples/generic xslt mapping in sap xi, part i.pdf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9692eb84-0601-0010-5ca0-923b4fb8674a
cheers
Sameer

Standard Process for Credit Memo & Debit Memos in CRM

Dear all,
What is the standard process for Credit Memo and Credit Memo Creation within CRM Complaint Transaction?
We can successfully replicate Return Items and Replacement Items in ECC Return Order
But I don't know how to process Credit Memo and Debit Memo in ECC.
What are the Accounting Implications takes place once we create and release the credit memo / Debit memo in CRM Complaint Transaction?
How to see the entire document flow?
I can create Credit Memo for a Returned Line Item in CRM without any errors. But I could not see any follow-up transaction or process either in CRM or ECC.
Kindly educate me in this regard. Your suggestions are highly appreciated
Best regards
Raghu ram
Edited by: Raghu Ram on Jun 23, 2010 6:29 PM
Edited by: Raghu Ram on Jun 25, 2010 8:30 AM

Hi suchi,
The following would be very useful to you.
To reduce implementation time for print forms development, SAP has created a set of the most commonly used forms - Preconfigured Smart Forms:
SD: Invoice, Quotation, Contract, Delivery Note, Order Confirmation, Scheduling Agreement, Inquiry, Cash Sales, Picking List
MM: Purchase Order, Request for Quotation, Contract, Delivery Schedule, Good Issue (3 scenarios), Good Receipt (3 scenarios)
FI: Dunning Notice
All can easily adapt these forms to their requirements, saving time and money.
Hope this information has been useful to you.
if you would like to have a smartform of your own i.e a Z or a Y then there is an option to get a sap script copied onto a smartform.
the sap script for the same is -> F140_DOCU_EXC_01
Go to Txn SMARTFORMS and just put the required smart form name in FORM field and then go to the menu bar: Utilities-> Migrate SAPScriptForm and juts type in the Script name which is given above(i.e F140_DOCU_EXC_01 )
I hope this will be an amicable solution.
if helpful pls reward.
Thanks
Venugopal

Recruitment Faxing & e-mailing only possible for standard text in SAPscript

Hi,
I am using the old recruitment module PA-RC ion ECC6 and I am trying to send an email to an applicant. When I try and do this I get message "Faxing and e-mailing only possible for standard text in SAPscript". In feature WPROC I am set up to use RTF. Is there no way to send RTF emails? Do I need to create SapScripts for anything that I may possibly want to email?
Thanks
Tom

Apparently only able to carry this out in SAPScript

Standard process for creating a new version of an existing report

Hi All,
We are using Siebel 8.1 with BI Publisher.
Does any one know the standard process for creating a new version of an existing report - ie if 'BIP Report XXX' is created and works correctly from the siebel view but then an enhancement is developed, how is the enhancement deployed so that the new version completely replaces the old?
One suggestion was:
You can upload a new version of an existing report. You have to navigate to Administration - BIP > Report Template Registration... search for the report you need to replace (I would say that the new rtf file need to have the same name). Now you have to go to the "Template" column where there is the reference to the report file already uploaded but you don't have to click on the link that is displayed you have to click near the link in order to place the cursor on the field then you will be able to see the Multi Value Grup icon .. you click on it and you will be able to upload a new file.
We have tested this process today, however it is not effective in replacing the old version of the report.
After carrying out this process (including related steps from bookshelf - ie "click upload files"), we can generate the report from the relevant siebel view and the previous version of the report is still generated.
Is there a standard process for replacing an existing report that is effective?
Thanks.

Hi ,
This currently seems like a bug , we have encountered this too.
work around is you have to delete the rtf files from server Siebel\client\temp\XMLP directory and upload them again so that they are not cached any more.
same on dedicated client you may have to delete relavant files form siebel\client\temp\xmlp directory and upload again.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Standard SAP process for third party repair or subcontracting repair

Hi All,
Please let me know if there is any standard SAP process for third party repair or subcontracting repair.
Given below is the process in brief.
1. Receive the repairable product in the warehouse from customer
2. Do the inspection in warehouse
3. Send the repairable product to the subcontractor to do the repair
4. Receive the repaired product from the subcontractor
5. Send the repaired part to the customer.
6. Bill the customer
Please share your inputs if you have any.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Madhu.

Hi there is no SAP standard process for this. I can give you work around for that.
1.. Receive the repairable product in the warehouse from customer - Normal customer returns or customise a movement type to receive it with our without value as per requirement
2. Do the inspection in warehouse - Normal inspection
3. Create a service PO with the vendor.
4. Send the repairable product to the subcontractor to do the repair - Send using 541 movement type to vendor or use the copy of 541 movement type to send to vendor.(you can refer PO also system does not validate)
5. Receive the repaired product from the subcontractor - Reversal of 541
6. Send the repaired part to the customer.
7. Bill the customer
Regards
Antony

Standard process for creating Services and accessing Services on EBS 11i

All,
Do you have any kind of documentation that explains how we should handle Services in the EBS 11i?
We have two types of interfaces currently and no one of them uses Services:
1. We create files in some kind of gateway
2. We get files generated in a gateway or when it's the case we access different databases via database link.
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Fernando

Right, but what would be all the standard process for creating a webservice?
Is there any kind of document that shows in detail how to do that? and also, how we should access webservices from other systems?
Thanks for your help.
Fernando

I will be buying the new IMac 27 inch in December. Would like input on the best configuration for photographic and possibly video processing-dream machine!

I will be buying an IMac 27 inch in December. What is the best configuration for photo and possibly video processing.Does one need a Mac Pro? Dream machine!

Just to explain what I just wrote to Laundry Bleach:
Why is there no iDVD on my new Mac?
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3673
UPDATE & ADDENDUM:
But even though you can still buy iLife 11 that includes iDVD 7 from Amazon, Apple now make it difficult to install:
Poster jhb21939 posted this in another thread:
“when I attempted to load iDVD into a new iMac. A notice came up on the screen stating that the 'Authorisation Licence' had expired on 25 March this year (2012).
I contacted the Apple support team and eventually, I was told that the Licence had been withdrawn and could no longer be used.”
In other words Apple are now so adamant that we don’t use iDVD that they have tried to make it impossible to install.
In response, Old Toad posted this solution:
“You can still use it one all of your Macs. If you get an invalid certificate message just set your Mac's clock to sometime before early 2011 and run the installer. After you're done reset the time back to the correct time.” He added this comment:
“It began after iDVD and iWeb were discontued and they were dropped from the Apple Store. All I can think of is the certificate was set to expire after a certain time period after the intitial iLife disc was released.
I've been able to use the installer even without setting back the date. I just clicked on the Continue button and it would work as expected. For some it would not continue unless the date was set back.”
The latest anorexic iMacs just announced do not even include a CD drive! Proof positive that Apple virtually prohibit the use of DVDs - although the newly announced Mac Minis do include a Superdrive.
Yet, they still include iMovie! Heaven alone knows or understands what you are supposed to do with your newly edited masterpiece - except make a low quality version for YouTube?

Filter conditions for Standard Idoc processing

Hi Experts,
       In BD64 - Distribution model , I have created filters for MATMAS based on Division, Sales Organization, Distribution channel and Material Type.
when I process the IDoc through BD10 - Send material it is not getting filtered based on the conditions set in BD64.
eg) I have created a material in a particular sales organization for which the data should not be processed through Idoc based on the filter condition set for sales org in BD64.
   But now that the condition is not been checked and the Idoc is processed when i send it through BD10.
whether BD10 will not check for the filter conditions?

hi asik,
partner in the generated idoc and in BD64 as a Receiver are the same.
I am using single filter group in BD64 ( Matmas ) for Division , Sales Org, Distribution channel and material type.
The filter group comprises the following filters:
Division                             - 01
Division                             - 02
Sale org                            - ABCD
Sale org                            - EFGH
Distribution channel          - AA
Distribution channel          - BB
Mtrl Type                          - SPAR
Mtrl Type                          - FNGD
These result in the filter conditions should be like
(Division 01 OR division 02)
and
(sale org ABCD or EFGH)
and
(Dst Channel AA or BB)
and
(mtrl type    SPAR or FNGD )
Scenario for idoc processing
                                         Division          01
                                         sale org         xxxx
                                         dst channel   AA
                                         mtrl type        FNGD
the Idoc should not be processed for the above scenario
but its triggering an Idoc when I test it through BD10.

Is it possible to have different CHARM process for R/3 and CRM system

Hi all,
I am currentlu workin on CHARM implementation and we have successfully gone live for R/3 System now we need to implement CHARM for CRM system. The Customer is asking to define a new Change request and new Urgent correction for CRM system as there is different approval procedure for CRM when compared to R/3 Now i want to know whether we can have a different CHARM process for CRM system alone, kindly give ur valuable inputs as it is very urgent.
Thanks in advance
Raju

Once the pricing procedure ia assigned to sales order, it is automatically copied into Invoice through Copy controls. You never assign pricing procedure to billing document. it is automatically copied.
Regards
AK

Process Orders analysis Target Cost & Quantity is showing as zero

Hi,
I am facing a very pecuilar issue.
On analysing the cost (COR3) of my Process Orders the Target Cost & Quantity is showing as zero.
However, actual costs/quantity is showing correct.
What could be the possible reasons for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vikrant Sood

Hi,
Are you done with Goods Receipt(GR) from production to Inventory?If GR is not done,you dont see target costs in COR3
Check standard costs of the finished material in MM02-->costing veiw2.If there is no standard costs for materials,you dont see target costs in COR3.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks,
Anusha

Approval process for Scrapping of asset

Dear SAP Gurus,
In our present client, there is a requirement is to have approval process for scrap inside SAP. And only on receipt of proper approval, the scrap should be posted and accounting should be generated.Please advice if it is possible to do so in standard SAP.
Many Thanks

In standard asset accounting this is not available. An option for this is to set-up a workflow for the appoval proces

Regarding Goods Reversal & Goods Issue Process for PO

Hi Experts,
           Could you any one tel me what is Goods Reversal and Goods Issue process for PO...
How to create the FM & detailed Procedure Pls?....
Please any one tel me.......
Thanks & Reagards
HB

Hi Hans,
SOURCE : HELP.SAP
Purpose
Inventory Management uses this process in such a way that the goods issue posting is divided into two parts that run in separate systems. Posting the GI document in the supplying plant results in a message to the receiving plant. The receiving plant then performs a complementary posting. The physical goods receipt takes place as usual.
Prerequisites
When using batch processing, the following prerequisites must be fulfilled:
Both the original and target systems have the same batch definition level.
The batch definition level is either the material or the client.
An ALE scenario exists for materials and classes (characteristics).
Unique batch numbers exist cross-system.
Batches can only be changed in their original system when they are not decoupled. From an organizational point of view, this must also lead to the batch status being changeable in a local SAP R/3 system. For example, this is impossible when transfer posting to a new batch and results in further actions, for example, relabeling containers, palettes and so on.
Characteristics
As for the purchase order in a one-system situation, the system should automatically post the material into the stock in transit at the receiving profit center and the corresponding Profit Center Accounting using intra-CC transfer prices at goods issue for the purchase order and the unchecked delivery. This requirement is valid for one-system situations as well as for two-system situations where there is an ALE interface. No internal billing document should be created.
In a two-system case, the receiving profit center should be derived at goods issue from the unchecked delivery. Profit Center Accounting then takes place with
Stock change transfer price to stock
Internal expense to internal sales
Internal clearing account to stock change transfer price.
Account determination in a purchase order for an intra-company-code transaction must be different from account determination in external transactions. Automatic GR/IR account clearing is required in both one-system and two-system situations.
The stock in transit must be visible in the receiving profit center.
The system must send a shipping notification at goods issue in one-system and two-system situations.
You need to create an invoice document for the internal and external trading statistics for cross-boundary deliveries as well as for customs purposes.
GR/GI slips are created.
Process Flow
Goods Issue Posting for Stock Transfers
The delivery triggers the goods issue in the issuing system.
The call contains the stock transport order data known in the delivery, including the PO item and the logical system of the recipient.
The transaction (quantity and value updates) is selected using the movement type:
Movement Type
Function
641
Goods issue with UB logic (Creation of stock in transit at recipient, immediate value posting).
647
As 641, however the goods receipt line (movement type 101) is added automatically, so that the goods receipt is posted at the same time as the goods issue (one-step procedure).
You determine the movement type according to the schedule line category in Sales and Distribution. The goods issue for a cross-system stock transfer must be different from the integrated transaction. This is achieved by adding a new movement type.
You post quantities and values at goods issue in the same way as a goods issue for a sales order. That is to say, the quantity is posted in the supplying plant and the value is adjusted to that of the stock account. The offsetting posting is made to a clearing account. The known data from the delivery is copied to Accounting to balance the account where necessary.
The system creates a message to the appropriate receiving system for all items with reference to a cross-system purchase order. The system does not perform any validity checks on the recipients data before posting begins. Incorrect Customizing results in the update being terminated.
If a goods issue has receiving plants in different logical systems, an IDoc is sent for each system.
In order that the goods receipt is able to use the values on the receiver side, you must add the values used to post the goods movement, in particular the transfer prices, to the IDoc.
The logic for recognizing the profit center switch functions as follows: At goods issue, the system recognizes that the profit center of the issuing plant is different from the profit center of the receiving plant. The system derives the profit center node from the relevant profit center.
Data Transfer
The IDocs sent by the issuing plant trigger the goods issue postings in the receiving plant.
Background Posting in the Receiving System
The goods receipt is posted in the receiving system using the IDoc. The interface receives the data from the goods issue in the supplying plant. The following processes now run at the recipient:
The system finds the update control for the GR part of the posting.
The goods movement is posted with the new movement type.
During valuation of the goods receipt, the system might, where necessary (UB logic), refer to the values (legal value and the value from the parallel valuation type, if you are using the transfer price function) from the IDoc.
The PO history is updated. The PO history is updated with the material document number from the second part of the GI posting. The GI document number is not stored in the supplying plant, because there is no way to display this document.
In two-step procedures the goods receipt is posted to the stock in transit.
Reversal
You can only reverse this goods issue for the PO using the cancellation transaction in SD. You cannot reverse the GI in Inventory Management.
The material document that is automatically created in the receiving system cannot be canceled. This reversal is triggered by the sending system (the actual reversal of the GI document takes place there) and transmits the data, including the reversal movement type, to the receiving system. No actual reversal is posted in the receiving system, because the material document number of the original document does not exist in this system. This scenario is applicable for cases where you use the two-step procedure (with stock in transit).
Distribution of Batch Master Data and Characteristics
The batch information is transported using the message category BATMAS.
When you create a cross-system goods issue, the system creates the corresponding IDoc using the message category BATMAS.
When the delivery arrives in the target system, the batch and all the information is already present in the system.
Changes to the batch data are also distributed using the message category BATMAS.
The batch can be decoupled in the receiving SAP R/3 system. This means that the batch can have a different status in the receiving system than in the original system. By setting an indicator at material level, you decide whether the batch can be decoupled or whether the batch and all its attributes are copied from the original system. "Decoupled" i.e. "locally independent" batches are no longer distributed from its own system.
The batch data does not need to be available before the physical goods receipt takes place. The goods receipt into the stock in transit does not usually refer to the batch unless you are working with batches with assigned active ingredient values.
If the GI cannot be posted for organizational reasons, for example because the goods cannot be loaded onto a truck until 10pm, then you can post the goods into the GR blocked stock. This stock is also non-batch-specific.
In cases where the GI IDoc arrives before the batch IDoc, then the GI IDoc can be subsequently posted by a periodically scheduled report (transaction BD87). A program like this exists in the SAP standard system. In Customizing for MM Inventory Management (activity Copy, Change Movement Types), you should make settings to define that manual creation of batches at goods receipt is not allowed.
Shipping Notification
The shipping notification is required in the receiving system due to its relevance for MRP. In this way, for example, a change in delivery date determined at goods issue is sent to the receiving system using the shipping notification. The shipping notification can also be used when posting the GR batches.
Reward if found helpfull,
Cheers,
Chaitanya.

Is Appoval Process for Standard Target possible in 11.1.2.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for