Is CS5.5 IDML a bug?

Hi All,
While opening 5.5 IDML file in CS5/4 InDesign quits. This happens in xml and non-xml documents, sometimes InDesign get hangs with showing progress bar. Even I have waited for more than an hour and its waste of time. Have anyone faced this problem before or is it a bug in cs5.5?
thanks
Jaswin

OK, I had some time to look at this, and I'm afraid the problem is not simple.
It is highly correlated with XML, though, so please do answer the questions I asked.
I think you will need to get comfortable looking inside IDML files in order to make good progress here. Remember they are just .ZIP files. You can unzip them, edit their contents, and zip them back up.
I spent a while examining your 00.idml file. Like all IDML files, designmap.xml is the overall index to the document, and it defines what portions are present.
Your designmap indicates that there are 46 stories in your document. That seems like a lot for your 3-page document, but OK.
It turns out that commenting out the first story is sufficient to make the IDML file open. That is, editing the designmap to look like this, around line 133 and following:
<idPkg:BackingStory src="XML/BackingStory.xml"/>
<!-- <idPkg:Story src="Stories/Story_u3079.xml"/> -->
<idPkg:Story src="Stories/Story_u3057.xml"/>
<idPkg:Story src="Stories/Story_u3010.xmxl"/>
<idPkg:Story src="Stories/Story_u2c62.xml"/>
It's curious that it is the first story.  Opening the resulting IDML file is interesting. Itl ooks like your document is actually the same, but there is some slight text reflow, and it fits on 2 pages instead of 3. I find that quite surprising -- I would have expected an entire story to have disappeared, and that did not seem to happen.
Of course, this doesn't exactly tell us what the problem is. To do that, we need to look inside that story file.
I haven't spent a lot of time looking at IDML files with a lot of XML-tagged content, but the 3079 story file looks basically like this:
<idPkg:Story ...>
  <Story Self="u3079" ...>
    <StoryPreference OpticalMarginAlignment="false" .../>
    <InCopyExportOption IncludeGraphicProxies="true" IncludeAllResources="false"/>
    <XMLElement Self="di2i105" MarkupTag="XMLTag/outline" XMLContent="u3079">
      <ParagraphStyleRange AppliedParagraphStyle="ParagraphStyle/Chap outl 2">
        <CharacterStyleRange AppliedCharacterStyle="CharacterStyle/$ID/[No character style]">
          <XMLElement Self="di2i105i1" MarkupTag="XMLTag/ce%3alist">
            <XMLElement Self="di2i105i1i2" MarkupTag="XMLTag/ce%3alist-item">
              <XMLElement Self="di2i105i1i2i3" MarkupTag="XMLTag/ce%3apara">
                <XMLElement Self="di2i105i1i2i3i4" MarkupTag="XMLTag/ce%3alist">
                  <XMLElement Self="di2i105i1i2i3i4i5" MarkupTag="XMLTag/ce%3alist-item">
                    <XMLElement Self="di2i105i1i2i3i4i5i6" MarkupTag="XMLTag/ce%3alabel">
                      <Content>1.</Content>
                    </XMLElement>
                  </XMLElement>
                </XMLElement>
              </XMLElement>
            </XMLElement>
          </XMLElement>
        </CharacterStyleRange>
      </ParagraphStyleRange>
    </XMLElement>
  </Story>
</idPkg:Story>
Now, if you comment out the <ParagraphStyleRange>...</ParagraphStyleRange>, it still crashes. But if you comment out the enclosing <XMLElement> as well, it does not.
So, it's not an issue of the particular content of the story, but rather the fact that it is XML tagged, and perhaps how the story is used. It's a lot less obvious to me. I suppose you could comment out the MarkupTag attribute, I didn't try that. But looking at XML/tags.xml, there is nothing too interesting about the outline tag.
Oh, another observation is that your document does not validate against the DTD in the structure pane. That could be related.
I suppose one could also open the appropriate Spreads file and fiddle with the TextFrame that is associated with Story u3079. See if associating it with another story works better. Looking at that frame casually, I don't see a real problem with it.
Also, much of the stuff in story u3079 is duplicated in story u6ee. I'm not sure what that means, but it seems like it might be related to the problem -- accidental duplication of an object?
I bet, also, we could explore more with the scripting DOM if we really got excited.
Hopefully this helps you get started!! Still waiting on some context/answers to earlier questions, though.

Similar Messages

  • IDML Import Bug?

    Hi All,
    Just wondering if anyone can reproduce what appears to be a CS4/CS5 IDML import bug.
    I typed
    11
    22
    33
    44
    55
    (first 3 digits in bold) then tagged "22" as an XML element before exporting an IDML file.
    When the IDML file is imported, I get
    11
    22
    33
    44
    55
    (all digits in boldface except for the trailing 2.)
    The problem seems to be on the import side of CS4/CS5 since the exported IDML looks okay to me:
    <ParagraphStyleRange AppliedParagraphStyle="ParagraphStyle/$ID/NormalParagraphStyle">
         <CharacterStyleRange AppliedCharacterStyle="CharacterStyle/$ID/[No character style]" FontStyle="Bold">
              <Content>11</Content>
              <Br/>
         </CharacterStyleRange>
         <XMLElement Self="di2i7i6" MarkupTag="XMLTag/Story">
              <CharacterStyleRange AppliedCharacterStyle="CharacterStyle/$ID/[No character style]" FontStyle="Bold">
                   <Content>2</Content>
                   </CharacterStyleRange>
                   <CharacterStyleRange AppliedCharacterStyle="CharacterStyle/$ID/[No character style]">
                   <Content>2</Content>
              </CharacterStyleRange>
         </XMLElement>
         <CharacterStyleRange AppliedCharacterStyle="CharacterStyle/$ID/[No character style]">
              <Br/>
              <Content>33</Content>
              <Br/>
              <Content>44</Content>
              <Br/>
              <Content>55</Content>
              <Br/>
         </CharacterStyleRange>
    </ParagraphStyleRange>
    Comments anyone?

    Hello Larry,
    i am the developer of the IDMLlib http://idmllib.com/ a Java library which is able to read/modify/create IDML.
    I have also noticed some strange behavior regarding the importing of IDML, where the order of elements affect the parsing of the IDML in CS4/CS5.
    My first thought was, i have created an invalid IDML, but the IDML Relax NG compact schema is very explicit, order doesn´t matter.
    The best example i have at hand, which is very easy to reproduce is the TabList. A valid tablist attached to ParagraphStyleRange for example looks like this:
    <TabList type="list">
        <ListItem type="record">
            <Alignment type="enumeration">LeftAlign</Alignment>
            <AlignmentCharacter type="string">,</AlignmentCharacter>
            <Leader type="string"></Leader>
            <Position type="unit">144</Position>
        </ListItem>
    </TabList>
    If you change this by moving the Position to the top, which is no problem regarding the schema which doesn´t enforce a strict order of the elements:
    element Alignment { enum_type, TabStopAlignment_EnumValue }&
    element AlignmentCharacter { string_type, xsd:string }&
    element Leader { string_type, xsd:string }&
    element Position { unit_type, xsd:double })
    So if you change this example to this, and reimport the IDML into CS4/CS5 INDD the <Position/> will not be parsed and you wont see a TabList
    <TabList type="list">
         <ListItem type="record">
            <Position type="unit">144</Position>
             <Alignment type="enumeration">LeftAlign</Alignment>
             <AlignmentCharacter  type="string">,</AlignmentCharacter>
             <Leader type="string"></Leader>
         </ListItem>
    </TabList>
    If you export this again as IDML the <Position/> if set to 0
    I circumvented this problem by forcing the creation of TabList Items with a constructor that will only allow to create TabListItems with all values present and therefore i can force the order of the created childs. But i think this will not be the only problem where parsing doesn´t do what it is supposed to do.
    There has been a posting from a guy complaining about different import results regarding the attribute order of IDML element:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/637711
    I will try to reproduce the behavior you decribed.
    Cheers, Andreas

  • Is there anyone with CS4 that could convert my CS5 idml file to inx so I can open in CS3?

    Is there anyone with CS4 that could convert my CS5 idml file to inx so I can open in CS3?  My school upgraded to CS5 and now I can't work on documents on my own computer at home. I want to work on a particular project at home but need it converted I do not own CS4 or know of anyone with it to help me.   The file is fairly simply layout and shouldn't have special features that would effect the down grade.  If you can help please reply or email me at   [email protected]
    Thanks
    Erin

    Send me a Private Mesage (click m name to go to my profile) with a link to the file and I'll do it for you.

  • [CS5] Terrible InDesign Bug!

    Hi,
    right now I have discovered a dangerous bug in InDesign CS5!
    For some reasons my software use label property of Cell to store some automation informations.
    After clearing overrides on cell style for this cell the label was changed!
    Scenario 1 (can be proof manualy):
    1. Create a Table
    2. Edit script label and entry something
    3. Create a cell style (let's call it "Test1")
    4. Edit script label and clear it
    5. Apply "Test1" cell style to this cell - you will see overrides (+ symbol)
    6. Click on clear overrides - the start contents of label from point 2 is present again!
    This is very IMPORTANT THING FOR AUTOMATION the label is NEVER changed by InDesign.
    Imagine a document with tentausend links to a database stored in label of cells! - with simple clear overrides on the cells the whole work is lost whithout return!
    Adobe - please fix it immediatly! - this bug was never bevore there since InDesign CS - first version of InDesign.
    regards
    Message was edited by: Jarema_IV
    The same thing happens with object styles!

    Adobe - please fix it immediatly! - this bug was never bevore there since InDesign CS - first version of InDesign.
    Nice ... Thx for pointing ...
    I wouldn't expect any fix soon ... They just don't care ...
    Will be quicker for you if you find your own workaroud ...
    For example copy of the table on another - hidden - layer ...
    robin
    www.adobescripts.co.uk

  • Flash CS5.5 Display Bug

    Have just installed CS5.5 on Windows XP3 - opened flash and tried to select a colour from the colour picker and saw the window in the screengrab.
    More often there are no colours displayed. However it recognizes that I am hovering over different colours.
    I've done some tests and found other issues.
    Choosing a sub tool provided the following window.
    When moving the Actions window, the display froze over the timeline
    Graphics details: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
    I do not expect to have to pay for customer service considering how much has been paid for the Master Collection Suite!!!
    Please provide a solution to this bug.
    (Same thing is happening with arrange documents and screen mode drop downs in Photoshop. Dreamweaver fine.)

    PS. Switching to test under the "desktop" setting seems to be more reliable.

  • CS5.5 Button bug??

    In Flash CS5.5 a button inside movieClip 1 triggers a function that:  a) removes movieClip 1 from the display list and b) adds  movieClip 2 to the display list.
    movieClip 2 has a button that triggers a function which reverses the first function, putting movieClip 1 back on the list.
    But the button inside movieClip 1 is now persisting in its "over" state, even though the pointer is not over the button.
    I know this isn't a "feature" and I believe this wasn't a problem before CS5.  Anyone know if this is something Adobe is aware of?  Anyone know a workaround, short of making the the button into a movieClip that behaves like a button?
    thanks, c.u.

    Bumping it or even posting it here is not likely to get anyone's attention other than other users.  These are user-to-user forums and the Flash Team seldom has any of its people visiting the forums.  If you want to report a bug, use the channel provided for it...
    Adobe - Wishlist & Bug Report
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Fireworks CS4 & CS5 application frame bug in OSX Lion

    I've had this problem before with Snow Leopard and CS4, never resolved it without the below, and it's bugging me to the point I don't want to pay for an upgrade to CS5 as it's still there in CS5, and I dreamed it might not be!
    I know the following facts:
    It doesn't exhibit on a clean OSX install.
    It doesn't exhibit on a new user account on the same machine.
    It doesn't go wrong for ages, but when it does it's impossible to fix without a clean install of OSX
    Deleting everything realted to Adobe/Fireworks (there must be something I miss - anoyone got  a list?) and re-installing CS4 or CS5 doesn't fix it.
    It's related to screen resolution (2560x1600) as it doesn't exhibit if I change the resolution, but I'm not going to run in anthing less than native on my cinema screen as that's pointless.
    What happens?
    Open or create a new document whilst using the application frame and the whole frame jumps full screen then up and left (out of bounds slightly) and sometimes the frame is over the image. 
    Sometimes it can be recovered by dragging the frame (if it didn't go outside full screen)  It makes using CS4 or CS5 a nightmare.
    I'd like to know where it gets the notion to move the frame/go full screen, and how I can reset this weird and annoying behaviour.
    Having to run Fireworks in a new account is a PITA.
    Help?

    WOW!
    After a couple of hours fruitless application conflict searching I stumbled on a solution.
    I tried the FW without the frame, and didn't like the way the bottom bar sat by the dock, so I turned on dock hiding, the bottom bar then snaps to the bottom of the screen.
    Went back to application frame on and was amazed to find that everything was now working as expected.
    I assumed it was to do with dock hiding, so unhid it, but FW still works fine.  Thought maybe it was to do with the number of icons in the dock (I have over 40) or the dock size, but can't replicate the problem in my other user account, so I can only assume the following:
    During the course of an editing session with multiple windows open and maybe with the FW window pushed under the dock and maybe opening a new file from finder in FW - maybe this is when it gets confused. - that would be a typical work pattern for me.
    So, no matter any more, I have a fix for next time - hide the dock, see if it resolves, if not hide the dock allow it to open in the non frame mode to full edges of the screen, see if that fixes it.
    It explains why a pristine user doesn't have the problem - small dock, it explains why a fresh install is okay for a while - dock not full of applications *I Must Have*  maybe someone somewhere can replicate the bug and fix it.
    *happy face*

  • CS5 shape resize bug?

    I am using illustrator cs5 and there seems to be a rather annoying bug. I deal with icons and symbols a lot and putting them in a mock up. As part of my work flow I make the icon large, then shrink it down to fit in my comp.
    so here are two images.
    first is the icon that was created. I expanded the object to shapes and grouped them.
    Then I scaled the group down to a smaller size.
    The result is a very distorted image with parts missing. I don't know why this is happening if there is some way around this. I have noticed it happening in not as drastic situations but enough to drive me bonkers.
    thanks in advance for any help.
    Colt

    I notice something about yur artwork so I did it a simialr way you did and scaled it as yyou did and the same results.
    I used all strikes and the arrow head feature from the Stroke Panel and group and then scaled .
    So instead of that I outlined the strokes and used the Pathfinder Unite Filter and got this
    Then when I scaled that done I got this instead of the results you achieved
    I agree I think it shoud hve scaled properly the first time but this maybe under the circumstances making it a compund path using the Pathfinder might a better approach.

  • Opening cs5 idml without importing images

    We save out a CS5 Indesign doc to idml for translation. Once translated we just open the idml in InDesign and tidy up. Now when we open the document it starts importing all the images and thewn crashes when it gets to a certain image, always the same one. I have trashed the image folder but it still tries to link. How do we stop it trying to link?
    We want it to open with grey boxes and then relink manually.

    Actually as soon as I posted I realized it probably won't work unless you move the links so the pointers become invalid and the links go missing (or open on a different system without the links). one way to deal with that might be to package the file, then make the .idml from the packaged version, and move the links folder. It probably isn't sufficeint to rename the folder if it it remains in the same path as the file itself since ID looks in subfolders for missing links before giving up.

  • Resize animation in cs5 64 bit bug?

    Hello,
    I'm trying to resize an animation I have larger, it has 12 layers, and 20 frames or so on each layer.  I'm using edit multiple frames and selecting them all, and it is working to resize them, but randomly it will delete one of my objects for a few of the frames.  When I scrub through the timeline after the resize, something is always missing, but it's always a random object and only for a few frames.  Has anyone else had this problem?

    Well, I guess I can get it to work by inputting values in the properties panel, instead of using the scale handles in the viewport....weird.  Guess it's still a bug, though. Has anyone else seen this problem?

  • Components seem to be missing from Photoshop CS5 since de-bugging PC by shop

    Since my Windows-7 PC went to the shop for a clean up following some suspect virus my CS5 Photoshop seem to have some components missing.
    I can get into CS5 (I had upgraded from CS3 earlier in the year and now I can't get into CS3 even though the icon is still there.) and upload a photo and use the basic tools but I can't use a lot of the ACTIONS: i.e. I get error messages like The command "Feather" is currently not available or "The command Channel Mixer is currently not available"

    Sorry - This should be a better quality copy. The ACTION stops when it gets to step 2 - the FEATHER
    Someone at my camera club suggested I was running out of RAM - I have 6GB so that shouldn't have been an issue.

  • Flash CS5 Debug breakpoint bug

    When I debug it simply refuses to stop at the breakpoints, thus making my work flow miserable. I did some searching on Google and seems this has been there since version CS3. I never found a solution for this. I reinstalled on top of the current installation and nothing happened and then did a complete installation and still it's the same. Check the video.

    OK this is thing is like the most unbelievable thing. I reinstalled Flash CS5 completely - no good, I completely unistalled all of my Adobe products and reinstalled - no good, I went nuts and reinstalled Windows and All my Adobe products - no good. I have been working on this copy of Flash CS5 for nearly three months and suddenly since last Friday this started happening and I'm speechless.
    EDIT : No Adobe professional is out there to answer this?

  • CS5 Liquify Tool Bugging

    I'm having an issue with the Liquify effect in CS5. When I use the Bloat Tool in Liquify at smaller brush sizes, the tool doesn't do what it's supposed to. It doesn't bloat the image, but rather blurs it, and further strokes over a worked area result in unwanted blurring and clone stamp tool-like results as well as erasing completely after stroking over it a few times.
    Are there any plug-ins, updates, etc. or anything that I can do to fix this problem?
    Thanks

    I have the same problem. The resource business is total nonsence. My workstation has 2 Intel Xeon 3.4 Gz processors with 6 cores each ( 24 cores total including FP cal)  and 48 GB of 1333 MHz  DDR3 RAM. OS is 64 bit Windows 7 on Raid 0 which has 4 Photofast SSDs each reading and writing at 270 MB/Sec and total raid read and write performace that more or less saturates the front side bus at over 1 GB/sec. Data is on a Raid 10. File sixe 6000 px by 3000 px single layer 8 bit Tiff.
    I have tried all combinations of memory allocation recommended by Adobe. Adobe CS5 runs in 64 bit. Scratch disk over 6 TB defragmented raid 10 in the workstation. No network raids used. Only programs running Windows 7and Photoshop CS5.
    All Adobe products have the latest build. The video card is FireGL 8750 with 2GB GDDR5 graphics frame buffer memory with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. This card has the latest sofware updates.
    It is a DISASTER in CS5 in Windows 7.  It works in XP Pro CS4 on a machine with lot less resorces.
    The liquify tool allows the application of the effects but after you  select OK then it goe to Render and progress bar of the render action. WHEN THE RENDER IS COMPETED WHICH HAPPENS FAIRLY FAST THE IMAGE DOES NOT SHOW THE RESULTS OF LIQUIFY FILTER. They all disappear.
    P.S.
    I have been working on this issue and have managed to solve it. One program that makes real time back up was running in the background and stealing the resources. Even though  performance panel showed only 1 -2% of CPU use with 4 -5 GB of RAM use, but it was worse than that. As soon as stopped that process, it all works fine.

  • PS CS5 MENU BAR BUG

    just installed CS5 today on Windows Vista 64 bit platform and the 32 bit version has two menu bars. as soon as the program opens there is a second menu bar which only goes away if i minimize and then maximize the window again. any ideas what may be causing this?

    Try uninstalling all your 3rd party plug-ins

  • Downsaving, Backsaving, or Legacy Saving CS6 to CS5 Rasterization (a bug)

    I have this image that I've created for a client in Adobe Illustrator CS6 on WIndows. Their designer has CS5.5 on a Mac. The image contains the following:
    Multiple artboards
    Inner Glow
    Layer transparency
    Transparent Gradients
    Strokes on gradients
    blends
    multiple clipping masks
    When I try to save the file back to CS5 I get a rasterized image in an Illustrator file instead of what I'm expecting. Has anyone else had this problem?

    What's really happening:
    The problem is the strokes on the gradients because that's a new feature in AI CS6.
    Work-around:
    When I expand appearance on the strokes on the gradients in CS6, it makes the gradient strokes into mesh gradients (not completely desireable or intuitive. However when I and save back to cs5 format it opens as expected in CS 5.5.
    Original: If you have to do this, you can still adjust the thickness of the now expanded stroke (technically a mask over a gradient) by selecting the path and using object path offset path.
    Correction: The option to use offset path is not the same as it would be on a mask containing a gradient. If the stroke is of a complex shape (eg. a stroke with rounded tips containing a gradient.) it will more than likely have to be redrawn to preserve the appearance.
    Suggested work-flow: If you know something will ultimately be saved back to a different version
    Suggestion for Adobe:
    Because the PDF interpreter in the older version of CS5 doesn't understand the new feature it throws an error. If you copy from CS6 and paste to CS5.5 it will show you the error, then CS 5.5 expands all of the editable features in the file. What should happen is when someone saves back to CS5 from CS6 in the plug-in it should expand appearance on all strokes that contain gradients to be an outlined path container for the stroke with the gradient as the fill. Converting to mesh gradients is highly undesireable on spot color images.

Maybe you are looking for