Is KM required for 'publish to EP6' - portal content & role?

is KM required in EP for 'publish to EP6' - portal content & role? we are not try to publish to KM catalog, etc. just the portal content and role. does KM required for that?
Thanks
Jane

Hi Jane,
of course I cannot speak for everyone here, but, sorry, I personally do not understand your question.
Is KM required for what?
Regards, Karsten

Similar Messages

  • What are the backend configuration required for photo upload from portal?

    Hi all,
    When i am trying to upload the photo from portal  it is giving error
    can not archive the photo
    we are using portal 7 and  ecc 6.0
    I want to know
    What are the backend configuration required for photo upload from portal
    Can any but help me out
    Rajendra

    Hi,
    Are you using the standard iview. If that's the case you need to configure in the backend. Meaning you need to store the photo in the Org management(HR) which the HR functional guys will do. You just need to add the iview to your role.
    Let me know if you require further informationn.
    Award points if helpful.
    Cheers,
    sathya

  • What are the requirements for publishing an App for private distribution, not sale.

    I need to create an App in English and 4 other languages for private distribution to individuals. What are the requirements for doing this please? I currently have a just a Single Edition license. Am I right in understanding I need a Cloud subscription and an Apple Developer subscription also?

    My client desire is to only make their accessible to paying members requiring a sign–in before download. Does this fall into a private distribution deployment.

  • Publish iviews in Portal Content Directory within BEX

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem wherein I'm not able to view the
    PCD contents while i'm trying to publish an iview to the
    portal thru BEX.In this case i'm not able to publish anything to portal.The Super administrator can view these with his ID.
    we are using EP6.0 and BW3.5.I have tried giving the
    same set of roles as that of administrator to myself even
    then it doesnt seems to work.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Gk

    Hi Arun,
    I have exactly the same problem as Catherine has. I checked through SM30, and there's one entry in the table with the following values:
    Destination: EPDBIP_PORTAL
    Name of the system: BIPCLNT040
    Default: checked
    URL Prefix: http://emsso2.web.bc:52000
    Prefix BW Metadata: /bip_metadata
    KM Service URL: <<empty>>
    However, I still get the bad index problem. Any more ideas (anyone) ?
    Thanks
    Frederik

  • Authorizations for Publishing a Query in a Role

    Gurus,
    I have S_USER_AGR (activity as: 01, 02, 03 06, 78)  and S_RS_TOOLS as webpublish and Themes...but my users are not able to Publish a Query to a Role from Query Designer in a Edit mode, but they were able to add the Query to a Role using "Enter in Role" button from BEx pop up screen...what Authorizations I am missing in my role?
    And also in QA and Production how can the Power Users can publish a Query or a Wrk book to a Role without editing a Query or Work book?
    Can some one share their thoughts..
    Thanks,
    KK

    Hi,
    I also facing same issue in Query designer. Unable to publish the roles in query designer. It is showing no roles assigned to you error mesg. I have added this object and given the * values. Then the problem is solved.
    Please user s_user_agr object with activity * and values *. They will get access to publish to roles, portals and broadcasting in query designer.
    Regards
    anil.

  • Which authorizations are required for assigning a query to a role?

    Hi everybody,
    we try to set up some roles for "reporting power users". These guys should be alble to define new queries using BEx (works fine) and also should be able to assign these new defined queries to a role, so other users can use these roles.
    The idea is simple, but we're searching for the right authorization object (or - as i suppose - set of authorization objects) that enables the user to assign a query to a role (using that "enter to a role" button in the open / save dialog).
    At the moment, the user can user that button, and the role, he should the query assigned to is shown. After selecting the role and clicking button "create" it take some seconds and a message "error when saving. entry has not been created" is shown.
    Obviously, there is a problem with writing the role (or adding the new information to that role).
    So, could anyone help me and provide me with a list of authorization objects that are required.
    Thanks in advance,
      Alfred

    S_RFC
    S_TCODE
    S_USER_GRP
    S_BDS_D
    S_OD_SEND
    S_RS_AUTH
    S_RS_BCS
    S_RS_COMP
    S_RS_COMP1
    S_RS_FOLD
    S_RS_ICUBE
    S_RS_MPRO
    The above mentioned authorization objects are enough to add in the role and required for the accessing a query.
    particularly, S_RS_COMP, S_RS_COMP1, S_RS_MPRO, S_RS_ICUBE are the most important auth objects which are directly getting involved in authorization of a query in a role.
    SO, you have to assign the respective info area, info cube and info providers names in these auth objects.
    The same scenario , i am using in my project to give access to the queries in all the areas for my end users.
    The values and access/authorizations restrictions is up to your project requirement.
    Hope this would help you.

  • Approval required for assignment of more than one Role+AccessPolicy

    Hi,
    we noticed the following behavior with OIM11gR2 (11.1.2.0.0):
    2 Role each one with it own Access Policy to provision AD resource
    case 1: if we request one Role at time by Catalog, no approval is required
    case 2 if we assign both Roles at same time by Catalog, one Request that requires approval il generated
    Questions:
    1. Is it default behavior?
    2. Is it possibile to avoid approval step for case 2? If yes, is there any side-effects removing the approval step?
    Thanks

    kumarsubhrata wrote:
    Dear friends,
    >
    > I have a depot plant and there Excise Registration No is 12. Excise Registration 12 have a single Series group 121 this time, where all entries (RG23D) are entered.
    > But, my customer needs one more Series Group to be assigned with Excise Registration 12 i.e. 122.
    > Actually they want separate Series Group for Depot Sales and Inventory Posting i.e. 121 for Depot Sales and 122 for Inventory Posting.
    >
    > Please suggest me that is it possible to assign 2 Series Group for single Excise Registration for Depot Plant?
    >
    >
    >
    > Thanks in advance.
    > Kumar Subhrata
    Hi,
    It is very much possible. Configure that settings in the IMG path
    SPRO -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Basic Settings -> Maintain Series Groups
    Click on new entries and enter 122 and assign excise registration 12 to it.

  • Help required for MSS configurations on Portal

    Hi Experts,
          Can someone please send me Portal Configuration guide or some kind of document on how to configure MSS --> Overview and Organisation services. Do I need to pass any parameters or any other configurations required?
    Please help me.
    Earlier responses would be much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Uday

    Hi uday,
    Please find the below links
    MSS Configuration within SAP Portal: Organization Structure
    ESS/MSS configuration in Portal as a part of HCM
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/14/1a6493d09849448a0537ee6727e799/frameset.htm
    Hope it helps...
    Thanks,
    Rahul.

  • Question about certificates required for publishing a script extension!

    Hi,
    I'm in the latest steps of creating my new In-Design plugin and I was studying the ways I can publish it and Adobe Exchange looks like a good option, but here they are saying:
    Paid Content must have a certified signature. (Content posted as Free will be accepted with a self-signed certificate.)Extension Manager should be able to verify the Producer’s signature. An application should be signed by a certificate issued by one of the following certificate authorities:
    Chosen Security Thawte, Globalsign, Verisign, Comodo, Usertrust, Godaddy
    And here, they say:
    blah ... so that you know that a trusted authority certificate will no longer be required. ...
    So, I'm a bit confused, my question is:
    1. is it required really to have these certificates?!
    2. If yes, how we are supposed to do this?
    Any idea would be much appreciated,
    thx, mim

  • What are the requirements for publishing a book on the App. Store?

    An associate of mine and I wrote have written a book of science fiction, and thought a good place to start publication might be on the App. Store - I know it is a place that a sizable number of people go, and I have heard stories about authors publishing a book to it, and benefitting from the act.
    One I heard of initially found his book 'rejected' by Apple, then 'accepted' (obviously after changes).  No explanation is given of what is necessary to be 'accepted' on to the App. Store.
    Does anyone know what they might be?

    You are confusing the iBookStore with the App store. Same family, but different store. Best to post this in the iBooks forums I think.

  • Auth objects required for creating super,power,end user roles

    Hi ,
    I need to create 3 roles according to the below requirement. can you tell me what auth objects req inorder to fulfill customer requirement.
    1.     Super User: 
         Have the access to Create/Modify/Delete own queries
         Can create Variables, CKF, Structures, Formulas & RKF at the cube level (global)
    2.     Power User :
         Have the access to Create/Modify/Delete own queries
         Can create Structures, Formulas at the query level
    3.     End User
         Have the access to run and navigate reports at the local level
    Hope I will get reply soon
    Thanks

    Karunakar -
    Few things you have to keep in mind when you are giving access to the reports and queries.
    S_RS_COMP only will not do.
    have you assigned S_RS_COMP1 and S_RS_MPRO for info areas and multi/info providers.
    and one more auth object S_RS_ICUBE for info cubes. you have to assign what ever the info cubes that you need to give access to the users.
    Then only user will get full access.
    precisely in order you can say,
    S_RS_COMP
    S_RS_COMP1
    S_RS_ICUBE
    and S_RS_MPRO.
    These are main auth objects which are related to info cube, info area access and BEx access.
    Hope this would give you clear pic.

  • Is TREX required for CCM 2.0 search?

    Hello,
    Is  TREX a manadatory component for CCM 2.0?
    Regards,
    Bejoy

    Hi,
    As already indicated TREX is a required component of the SAP CCM 2.0, even in the scenario where the search functionality would not be used (i.e. in a scenario of just navigating the hierarchial structure and selecting items) the TREX is still a requirement for publishing and indexing of the published data.
    Regards,
    Jason

  • Requirement for Leave Request.

    Hi All,
               I have a requirement for leave request in Portal. Basically employee will have two managers. Now my scenario is, if there is no line manager then the Approver field must be defaulted with the next manager.
    Is there any BADI for this?
    Thanks!
    Deepak.

    Hi 
    I am facing the same issues, when you wrote the udpate has been done by"I copied the Iview and used the handler IviewLauncher"
    Can you shre more details , and the steps ,  Many thanks

  • How to publish visual composer model to portal content

    Dear all,
    I need information about how to publish visual composer model to portal content. does any one now???
    Regards.

    Hi,
    after doing deployment the model in the VC will be published in the Portal content.
    You can define the path where you want to publish the Model in the Portal under portalk content in
    (In VC) Tools->Options->Compiler->Deployment folder(mention the folder name in the portal content).
    hope you got my point.
    Regards,
    Govindu

  • Dynamic Portal Content

    Dear All
    I am creataing a page on Portal will be used to display advertisements.
    Advertisments have many paragraphs. How can I manage the web content of such type on Portal.
    Using Webdynpro to fetch text from database is an expensive task.

    hi adnan,
    Web Content Management in the Enterprise Portal -
    The future of traditional Web Content Management (WCM) systems is uncertain. Businesses
    are increasingly implementing enterprise portal solutions that are primarily focused
    on application and business process integration. However, existing Web Content
    Management systems that concentrate on the creation, maintenance and provision of
    web-based content, for example for intranet operation, have become established in today’s
    enterprise. This development presents a new challenge for enterprise IT departments:
    These two very separate system worlds must be unified both in design and technology.
    Enterprise portals represent a direct advancement for intranets and dynamic websites,
    mainly due to the user-specific integration of applications and information in a single,
    unified user interface. In order to make a clear distinction, the terms “intranet” and “portal”
    should be defined:
    An intranet provides employees with information using static HTML pages and/or a Web
    Content Management System. Access to individual web-based applications from the
    intranet is made possible by simple links. Consequently, an intranet is designed mainly
    for the purpose of information distribution and is only marginally involved in process optimization.
    Since there is no logical connection between the applications, users are forced
    to log in separately to various applications with different user registration data. The required
    user names and passwords are usually not consistent throughout a company. Furthermore,
    roles are not part of intranet design and it is not possible to customize the
    user interface (“user customizing”).
    An enterprise portal is a complex integration infrastructure that consolidates application
    systems, services and information from a variety of different sources within an enterprise
    into a central, unified user interface (e.g. web browser) that is individually adapted for
    each employee and accessible from every desktop. Enterprise portal content is individually
    adapted for every employee or group; this is made possible by corresponding role
    concepts.
    Enterprise portals have opened a single point of entry for a variety of different business
    applications. So why not simply present the complex content required directly within the
    enterprise portal and completely replace existing extranet or intranet solutions? Most
    new generation portal software products neglect this concept. The Content Management
    they offer out of the box is rudimentary at best. Unfortunately, many IT decision makers
    are either partially or completely unaware of this shortcoming.
    On the other hand, there are highly sophisticated Web Content Management systems and
    products on the market – functionalities range from Internet building blocks for creating
    simple homepages to adequate workflow integration within the Information Lifecycle.
    Moreover, these systems include additional tools for generating navigational structures
    as well as editing and authoring tools for managing content on websites. Link management,
    approval workflows and access controls for designated areas of the web-based
    solution are practically taken for granted. A Web Content Management system delivers
    the technologies, tools and methods for creating, managing, storing, preserving and providing
    electronic content throughout the entire enterprise. This generally recognized defnition originates from AIIM International (Association for Information and Image Management
    International). Unlike document management, which can be described as a database-
    supported management system for electronic documents, Web Content Management
    encompasses web publishing, publishing intranet or internet pages and provides
    structured publication of web-based information.
    At first glance, deploying Web Content Management systems allows enterprises to unify
    web-based content and application-based information within a single enterprise portal,
    regardless of the format in which the information is available.
    Some WCM software manufacturers have already taken action and provide – specifically
    for the SAP NetWeaver™ Portal – comprehensive integration packages that integrate
    their high-performance Web Content Management systems in the portal software.
    But how do companies manage and supply the content to be published in an enterprise
    portal created on the basis of business-oriented portal software? At a time when users
    are already confronted with heterogeneous environments in their day-to-day work, every
    additional system is simply another burden. Integrating a high-performance, technologically
    advanced Web Content Management system in an enterprise portal is problematic
    because, to a great extent, both software solutions implement competing concepts and
    technologies which must be further explained.
    Both systems require their own server infrastructure and rely on their own, completely
    proprietary software architecture based on a separate database and/or data storage system.
    As a result, additional expenditure is incurred for all of the following aspects:
    · Parallel expenditure for hardware
    · Parallel expenditure for operation and monitoring
    · Parallel expenditure for backup & restore
    · Parallel expenditure for security design and implementations
    · Parallel expenditure for performance optimization
    · Parallel expenditure for administrator training
    From the perspective of an enterprise portal infrastructure, a Web Content Management
    system is a third-party system which must be integrated via interfaces. Thus, the following
    issues must be addressed:
    (1) Parallel existence of two navigational structures: a) navigational structures, pages
    and roles within the enterprise portal and b) menu items and storage structures
    within the external WCM system.
    (2) Editors are required to learn how to work with two different tools and user interfaces.
    (3) A search function must be developed that can be utilized for both systems; access
    rights for both systems must be given special attention here.
    (4) Parallel existence of two authorization concepts. Defining access rights in an enterprise
    portal is generally possible on the basis of users, groups, and portal roles in
    particular. Access rights management in a WCM system has its own administrator interfaces
    and authorization objects which need to be aligned.
    (5) Parallel workflow concepts: An enterprise portal has application-oriented workflow
    procedures that are usually based on the user administration integrated into the portal
    (users, roles and groups). A WCM system often uses its own staging concept for
    approving web pages based on its own workflow which exists parallel to the portal
    workflow.
    (6) Parallel user registration data management: Enterprise portals offer powerful features
    for user administration which must be used in addition to or in competition
    with the WCM system user administration. It makes sense to use a single LDAP interface
    for both systems. However, this does not solve the key problem: both systems
    have their own administration tools for user management.
    (7) Parallel security concepts: Enterprise portals offer very powerful security design concepts
    and functions; a WCM system has its own design concepts and these must also
    be managed and taken into consideration.
    (8) Some external WCM systems generate portal objects (e.g. menu items in portal
    roles) via interfaces. Changes to these generated objects are overwritten during
    each generation process making it impossible to use all of the functionality of the
    portal tools. Only the features that are generated and/or supported by the WCM system
    can be fully leveraged.
    (9) Parallel concepts for link management: There are different methods for creating and
    managing links in both software systems. A particular problem is posed by targets
    that affect the role-based navigational structure of the enterprise portal which generally
    cannot be conveniently selected as most editors would expect.
    (10) Parallel page creation and layout concepts (look & feel): Both systems have their
    own concept of performance-optimized page presentation. Similarly, both systems
    offer different methods and tools for editing the “look & feel” of the pages.
    Taking the above issues into consideration, serious thought should be given to integrating
    an external Web Content Management system in an enterprise portal. From a longterm
    perspective and when taking the Total Cost of Ownership into consideration, operating
    two IT systems as complex as these parallel to one another is impractical, even if the
    WCM system manufacturers offer portal-specific integration packages for their software.
    A closer look at these packages shows that many of the interface problems and design
    redundancies detailed above will nevertheless continue to persist.
    From the author’s perspective, every project involving Web Content Management in enterprise
    portals should question whether or not the desired editing processes and WCM
    requirements could be served with the standard features of the enterprise portal or covered
    by an expansion package or implementation and project work. This solution path is
    further explained in the following practical example.
    Practical example: Web Content Management in the SAP NetWeaver™ Portal
    With its SAP NetWeaver™ Portal, SAP not only provides the basis for a successful
    backend system for business process optimization, but also delivers basic Web Content
    Management functionalities. In order to structure the content, the SAP NetWeaver™ Portal
    utilizes a central tool - the Portal Content Studio.
    The Portal Content Studio offers a central environment for developing and managing all
    types of portal content, such as portlets (iViews), pages, layouts, worksets, roles, and
    packages.
    Figure 1: Portal Content Studio for the SAP NetWeaver™ Portal (source: btexx Portal)
    The most important object in the Portal Content Catalog is the role, which serves two
    purposes: First of all, the role is assigned to users or user groups, achieving the typical
    personalization required of an enterprise portal, secondly, the role in the SAP portal defines
    the menu structure that is linked to the role at the same time.
    A role can be implemented as a hierarchical tree structure with an infinite number of
    nested objects. The tree structure is formed by creating folders. Pages or iViews can be
    positioned at any level within the hierarchy. There are different types of iViews; typical
    examples of iViews are R/3 transactions, eBusiness applications, Internet/intranet applications,
    or content-based iViews (HTML content, text, graphics). iViews are typically positioned
    and arranged on pages but they can also be independently built into roles.
    Within a role, so-called Entry Points must be defined which are then included as a menu
    item in both of the top navigation bars of the portal menu. The portal menu is generally
    comprised of multiple roles (with corresponding Entry Points). However, the order of the
    menu items can be defined (using the Attribute Priority).
    Additionally, SAP provides an Internet platform that offers a selection of ready-to-use
    portal contents in a general catalog that can be imported into the Portal Content Studio.
    SAP calls these out-of- the-box solutions SAP Business Packages. Partners and other
    software manufacturers are able to provide solutions and/or interfaces based on this
    platform and have them certified by SAP (SAP offers a certification program especially
    designed for these solutions). The iView list for the so-called Portal Content Portfolio
    (formally iView Studio) includes thousands of iViews.
    The SAP Portal Content Portfolio can be accessed here:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developerareas/contentportfolio
    In many aspects, the tools and capabilities of the Portal Content Studio are comprehensive
    and advanced yet they are not sufficient for comprehensive Web Content Management.
    First and foremost, the Portal Content Studio supports the establishment of rolebased
    navigational structures and the definition of portal pages on which iViews can be
    positioned and arranged. This method of content creation is comparatively complex and
    not suited for the daily business of an editor, who is typically less involved in changing
    content structures and more involved in changing the content elements contained therein
    (text, graphics, flash files, links, documents, etc.). Pragmatic methods and simple
    mechanisms are desired for the management of this content. The material in the content-
    based iViews must be freely definable through simple and intuitive means and editors
    should be able to create content themselves.
    The SAP Knowledge Management (KM) component is available for storing content and
    documents in SAP NetWeaver™. The content to be presented can be stored and managed
    via a folder structure that must be managed parallel to the Portal Content Directory.
    However, in the standard feature set of the SAP NetWeaver™ Portal, the KM folder where
    this content is later to be saved must be defined for every content-based KM iView. An
    automatic link between the current role position and the KM location is not created. Simple
    shifting between read and edit mode is another feature that is not available in the
    standard version despite the fact that this functionality is extremely important for editors.
    Despite the multitude of existing functions, the standard SAP NetWeaver™ Portal offers
    insufficient capabilities for comfortable Web Content Management. Editing capabilities for
    XML forms, so-called docs iViews, URL-iViews or TREX searches are offered but their use
    is anything but intuitive and involves a great deal of administrative expenditure. This
    makes a high level of knowledge in building web content within the SAP NetWeaver™
    Portal a prerequisite. Above all, there are little or no possibilities for using Web Content
    Management functionality such as the construction of generic content structures, link
    management, multi-language support or a navigational context available from the search
    results without the relevant programming or HTML knowledge.
    This is where an enhancement from btexx business technologies GmbH, the Business
    Package easyWCM for Web Content Management in SAP NetWeaver™ Portal comes in. It
    uses the Portal Content Studio as a central tool yet significantly accelerates editing processes.
    It allows content elements to be linked effectively with portal objects that are created
    automatically through the use of easyWCM iViews. Every authorized user can create,
    publish and edit information.
    This Business Package automatically stores the content elements in the KM component
    assigned in the navigation structure in the background and makes them available for further
    editing on portal pages, greatly simplifying subsequent content management work.
    This is why the editor no longer requires technical knowledge of where the content is
    stored in the KM. Thanks to easyWCM, both the editor and the end-user work with the
    same portal role and costly multiple management of the navigation and content storage
    structure is unnecessary. Using the “Inplace Editing” feature, the editor is able to edit
    content directly on the portal pages on which the content is presented and visualized.
    The Business Package is based 100% on the SAP NetWeaver™ Portal and Knowledge
    Management Components; no third-party servers or additional software products are required.
    The portal server is solely responsible for providing the runtime platform.
    A third-party Content Management System may be able to offer a larger selection of features
    than easyWCM but it implementing and operating the additional solution will require
    a great deal more resources. The easyWCM Business Package for the SAP Net-
    Weaver™ Portal provides Web Content Management simply and effectively while supporting
    the following essential requirements:
    Complete integration for SAP Portal Content Studio
    An editor does not need any tools other than the SAP Portal Content Studio. The desired
    navigational structures are provided as SAP portal roles in the SAP Portal Content Studio
    - the application of easyWCM iViews is thereby possible anywhere within portal roles,
    worksets and pages. The main advantage of this solution is that the editors enter content
    in a single environment in which all web content and navigational structures are stored
    and administered.
    Inplace editing:
    End-users and editors work with the same portal roles. Therefore, no separate portal
    roles for providing and maintaining the content are required! As an editor, easyWCM
    iView offers you the ability to add and work on content components directly within the
    portal (Inplace Editing). Furthermore, the editor is able to use SAP KM standard functions
    (e.g. authorization assignment, workflow, feedback, rating, etc.) directly within the content
    component.
    Automatic creation of KM folders
    A general standard is that everyone must indicate the respective KM file path in which
    the content components are to be stored. This requires a great deal of effort when maintaining
    portals with a large number of web content elements. easyWCM automatically
    produces the necessary listings with the desired KM authorizations at runtime and simultaneously
    activates the desired KM services (life span, manual arrangement, history,
    workflow). During shifting or copying processes in the SAP Portal Content Studio, the
    elements are automatically moved and copied within the KM!
    Preview functionality from Portal Content Studio
    A preview function for each form is easily accessible with a single click. It is also possible
    to preview items directly from the Portal Content Studio in order to view the complete
    portal page, for example. easyWCM iViews were designed in a way that also enables users
    to enter and edit content directly from the SAP Portal Content Studio preview function.
    Multiple use of content elements
    easyWCM iViews may be adjusted in such a way as to allow content to be used more
    than once. Using this option, the content is not stored by the role and/or page, but is
    linked centrally within the easyWCM iView. The multiple use of content components is
    important, for example, if the right column of the portal presentation is exactly the same
    for several pages (e.g. for contact data, partners, advertisements, etc.).
    Approval workflow
    If desired, the SAP KM approval workflow may be activated in order to manage content
    elements. Changes to content elements will only be visible after the approval. All XML
    forms provided by easyWCM support the SAP KM approval workflow and indicate the
    permission status by using traffic lights.
    Version management
    If desired, the SAP KM version management may be activated in order to manage content
    elements. An editor with the proper authorization can specify the portal pages on
    which version management should be activated. When version management is activated,
    it is possible to replace older content components or to cancel incorrect modifications.
    With each change, a new version is automatically stored and documented including the
    date and the person who made the change.
    Life span
    If desired, the SAP KM life span function may be activated in order to manage content
    elements. An editor with the proper authorization can specify the portal pages on which
    the life span function should be activated. Activating the life span function makes it possible
    to publish a content component for a specific period (this is useful for news or
    events, for example).
    Authorization-based search functionality
    The SAP NetWeaver™ standard component TREX is used for the search function. One of
    the key advantages of easyWCM compared to external WCM solutions is that the search
    is implemented completely on the basis of the SAP NetWeaver™ platform and, in particular,
    that it is dependent on the authorization status. A separate search machine with its
    own user and authorization administration is not required.
    Multi-language support
    easyWCM automatically detects the language of the editor and stores the content in
    separate folders. Folders for content in different languages are created based on the active
    portal language.
    Ready-to-use forms and pages
    easyWCM contains a set of immediately useable portal roles and pages which may be
    used for your desired menu structures and page layouts. As such, easyWCM provides the
    ability to create and maintain Internet pages without special HTML programming knowledge.
    easyWCM also contains more than 30 XML forms based on the XML forms builder
    (SAP standard) which can be used for content creation. These XML forms may also be
    custom designed to fit your needs.
    Personalized user interface
    easyWCM determines the user interface depending on portal authorizations of the
    user/editor and the corresponding authorizations of the respective KM folders. The
    easyWCM package contains different KM layout sets which may be activated via customization,
    if desired. Working on content is simple; an editor with the appropriate KM writepermissions
    regards
    karthik
    reward me points if it helps you

Maybe you are looking for