Is that possible to allow the Good Receipt on customized return Mvt Type

Hi All
Is that possible to allow the Good Receipt on Customized movement Type, Reference string for these movement type is 601
and these customize movement type has bee flagged for reveres movement type indicator under Internal Control and Under Update control consumption Posting is set as G "Planned consumption"
Thanks in advance

Hi There
As per the STD SAP,,
601 Goods issue for delivery (SD)
This movement cannot be entered manually. It is created automatically in SD using the function "Goods issue for delivery".
The quantity is taken from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators: E, K, Q
You could have copied the 602 istead of 601,,
However if you are planning for the receipt (Returns from customer) you can use the Mov type-651,, if you want to have diff Acc assignments, you can copy this to Z movements,,
Hope it helps
Thanks
Senthil

Similar Messages

How to stop the goods receipt before issueing the goods for production orde

Frndz,
I have created a production order, now before even making the issue of rawmaterials from the inventory the system is allowing the goods receipt for that production order , kindly tell me the step by step procedure to check it.
Regards,
Srini

Hi Srini,
there are couple of ways to handle this situation..
1. If you set all the components as Backflush relevant in Material Master or setting all Compoents tick in OPK4 will ensure that at the time of confirmation you will have all the components will be done auto GI.
Now in your control key or Prod. scheduling profile specify that Auto GR.
Now your GR & GI are linked.
In OPK4, in the 2nd Tab page, termination of Goods Movements and Goods movements Ticked, so that when ever there is a problem with the components system will terminate the Confirmation.
So there will not be any GR without GI.
But, one can make GR with MB31 or MIGO
(So this is an option but no fool proof method).
2. Activating the User Satus (Status Profile) so that once the GI is done only you allow the Confirmation.
(The settings we can discuss if required).
3. Having the Use Exit..
Enhancement - MBCF0002
Functional Module - EXIT_SAPMM07M_001
Include - ZXMBCU02
Refer below links for further details..
do not confirm without goods issue
default quantity of confirmation(co11) should allowed in goods movements mb
Revert for further discussion..
Regards,
Siva

Error when posting the goods receipt

Hi we have recently successfuly updated 4.6 B to ECC 6.0.But when i am doing captive consumption by 949 Mvt. through process message system gives an error that
Error when posting the goods receipt
Message no. CB345
Diagnosis
With the selected process message, a goods receipt for the order was reported to the warehouse (destination ZPI1). However, an error occurred when the goods receipt was posted.
Please do needful.
Regards,
PP

Hi Daniel,
This is the first time i am coming across an issue like this.
neverthless from a logical front,
1. Remove Cost center as a valid receiver in Settlement Profile.
2. Your OKB9 setting are pretty much good. No need to worry about it. Becasue, OKB9 only will work if the system doesn't identify any other cost object. In this case Production Order is an automatic cost object which system should have taken.
3. Check the Settlement rule when you have created Production Order. It should have been MAT.
4. I hope you are creating Production Order with Material (using CO01 and not CO07)
5. Make sure in OPL8, the default rule in controlling tab is PP1.
Once all these are fine, i do not see any reason why you will get your probelm.
Please check and revert back to me if the problem still persists.
Best Regards
Surya

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1-----STO1---- 562----- Mat. Doc.101.05.2011--
500-   ST
PLANT1-----STO1---561Mat. Doc.205.05.2011--
1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo101.05.2011--99--
500- EUR
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo205.05.2011--89--
1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

Hi,
Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.
In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .
since this is a 562 which is a individual entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .
Regards,

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt

Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 :   We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 :   We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 :   Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1           STO1         562           Mat. Doc.1           01.05.2011            500- ST
PLANT1           STO1         561           Mat. Doc.2           05.05.2011           1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1            DocumentNo1            01.05.2011        99            500- EUR
G/LAccount1            DocumentNo2            05.05.2011        89            1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PM

SAP only checks if there is enough quantity in the period (month), it does not check if there is enough stock at date level.
there is no stock stored in any table for a given date. SAP would need to run the logic of MB5B to calculate the stock at a certain date, this would cause tremendous performance issues.
you either have to do this calculation yourself in a user exit, or you better train your users.

PO dont close with the GOODS RECEIPT

hi
We have this scenario.
there are some goods receipt PO based in a Purchase order xxx, but the Goods receipt doesnt a base document and the PO xxx is a open status. The goods receipt show in the remarks "based on xxx purchase order" and we can send to PO xxx to a new goods receipt again and this one closed. How do I link documents and the documente show close status to no duplicate the goods receipt. We have 2007 sp00 pl 05?
I´ve run the query in the sap note1152374 but we dont have any result.
Regards
NANCY HERNANDEZ

1.-When this error is generated is lost the link but also the PO document changes its status to open?
Is it possible? because de PO are open again
The PO is never closed due to lost link. It did not open again
2.-check the logs and there´s no changes more than the creation of document
When the document creating, no log will create for anything changing from PO. That is because they are different documents.
3 .- The scenario is replicable?, I can not generate the error again to explain to my costumer. How do I reply?
Yes, if you changes anything like warehouse, it will. (Even if you changed back to match the original!)) Let them to check out what are the differences between PO and GRPO.

Wanted to block the Goods Receipt but not the Invoice Receipt

Hi
After the partial delivery of the Goods Receipt, i am manually setting the "Delivery completed" indicator in the PO. I dont want any future delivery against this PO. But it is allowing me to do a GR even though the Delivery Completed Indicator is set.
How can i stop all the future deliveries agains the PO. But at the same time, is should not block the IR. I tried this by locking the PO item. It is not allowing me to do any GR after locking the same. But at the same it is not allowing me to do the IR also.
Is there any way i can stop the GR, but do the IR for the purchase order ? Please clarify. Points assured.
Thanks
Venkat.

Hello,
If u maintain the latest GR date as a current date in the PO item level - delivery tab, then system will not allow to do further GR in future.
Latest Possible Goods Receipt
This is the latest acceptable date for goods receipt (GR).
If goods are received after this date, you will receive either a warning message or an error message, depending on the system setting.
If you receive an error message, you will not be able to post the GR.

Need RFC which can post the Goods Receipt

Hi,
My scenario is to post the Goods receipt, by using file and after posting the Goods Receipt i want the acknowledgement whether it is successful or unsuccessful. There is an idoc MBGMCR02 which can post the Goods Receipt but application acknowledgement is not possible in file to idoc scenario, so now i am searching for a RFC so that i can handle this situation using BPM synchronous process. Kindly suggest any RFC or BAPI which can post the Goods Receipt.
Thanks & Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
As per my understanding this is a "File To (Inbound) Proxy" scenario, in which you can use the BAPI "SD_SHIPMENT_POST_GOODS_ISSUE" to do the PGI into R/3 system.
To perform this, you can go-ahead with the steps as mentioned below:
Source (XI) System:
1. Create the source & target data type in XI.
2. Do required mapping in XI.
3. In configuration directory, use the adapter type "XI" on the receiver communication channel.
Target (R/3) System:
1. Call transaction "SPROXY".
2. Create the interface class (double click on Inbound message Interface, inside your namespace in R/3).
3. Inside the class (proxy), create an internal table to keep all the records which will be coming from XI after your mapping.
4. Pass all the data to above create internal table.
5. Now, call function module "SD_SHIPMENT_POST_GOODS_ISSUE" and pass all required data from ur internal table to this FM (BAPI).
Note: Kindly read about this FM (BAPI) first in SE37 under "Function Module Documentation".
6. Do commit work after calling the FM (BAPI).
I hope this will help you to resolve all your queries.
Regards,
Sarvesh Singh

Is it possible to allow the user to revoke its own it resource?

Is it possible to allow the end-user to somehow revoke its own resource?
What would be the correct approach if he decides that he doesn't need access to a specific system and decides to terminate his account ?
Thanks for any insight.
Adriano.

One way by creating dummy resource, he will raise a request but no approval will be triggered (if you want then you can modify).
In the provisioning workflow call the OIM APIs.
Second approach I have to look into it.

Packaging material is not appearing in the Goods receipt of STPO

Dear All,
We are currently dealing one Roll-Out project for one multinational company. In that from sales side, one of the main processes defined is u201CStock Transport Purchase Order processu201D. As a regular process, outbound delivery document also created with ref to STPO.
As per the client requirement the u201CPackaging materialu201D needs to be added as additional line item in the delivery to calculate the packaging cost. This packaging material is a "Stockable and Valuated" material. So while performing the PGI the stock will get reduced from SD side.
The problem is, using this same STPO delivery document the Goods receipt is planned to do in the another side of company code. while doing the Goods receipt system is displaying only the "Finished Product" only. The packaging material is not displaying while doing the goods receipt in the another company code.
due to this we are not able to complete our test cycle.
so we need the expert opinion to solve this issue.
if the packaging material is added as additional line item while doing Goods receipt then, the problem is solved.
Kindly suggest us...
Regards,
MANI
frWe have customized that also and now u201CPackaging materialu201D is adding as a new line item in the delivery document as a non valuated material.
But the issue is, the Billing type u201CZICu201D is not getting determined while creation of billing if u201CPackaging materialu201D is added as a new line item. If u201CPackaging materialu201D is not added as a line item then, billing type is getting determined automatically without any issue.
We have checked in LIKP table, its containing the billing type as u201CZICu2019. But if packaging material is added then, the billing type determination is not happening.
We are assuming that some customizing needs to be done from MM/SD point of view. I am seeking the experts help regarding this issue to solve the problem.
Regards,
MANI

Dear Friends,
Thanks for the Feedback.
Even though it is a associated company, in one company code the packaging material stock was reduced and packed for the STPO shipment.
After receiving the consignment, in the receiving company code they will perform the goods receipt with ref to "Outbound Delivery" document.
Since in the outbound delivery document "Packaging material" also available. So as a business strategy we are expecting the same "packaging material" also should available for goods receipt.
I hope i have explained with max of my knowledge to clear your doubt.

Setting the Goods Receipt indicator in SRM

Hi,
I have been assigned to clear the goods receipt indicator for certain vendors during the purchase order creation process. I modified the BADI BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND to clear the gr_indicator and it does that. On R/3 EKPO-WEPOS(gr_indicator) is clear. The problem is When I display the purchase order in SRM by clicking Header Data\Follow on Documents\ the Confirm Performance of Service Goods Receipt
checkbox is still populated. I have been told that is because there is a SRM table where that gr_indicator is located but we can not determine which tables. I wanted to trace the transaction bbp_pd but we can not trace in our QA environment.
Does anyone know the SRM table that contains the Goods Receipts indicator?

Hi,
For quicked Replies..........Post to the dedicated SRM Forums
Forum->SAP Solutions->SRM - General
Forum->SAP Solutions->SRM - Shopping Cart & Catalog
Forum->SAP Solutions->SRM - Workflow & User/Vendor/Org. Management

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE, will do the goods receipt ( MB01 )for the subcontracting PO with batch management.

Dear Professionals ,
I Just want to confirm that whether BAPI "BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE " will do the goods receipt ( MB01 ) for the subcontracting PO with batch management.
Since I will be passing only 101 mvy type in BAPi, will the system automatically call 543 mvt type with batch management and post the consumption.
can I change the batch of the component items ?

Hi ,
Delivery note is like a ref document number
so you can use the
In the BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE There is header structure BAPI2017_GM_HEAD_01 which has a field REF_DOC_NO
you can pass the delivery note value to that field .
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jul 10, 2008 3:41 PM

Error in R3 system when create the Goods receipt in EWM

Dear EWM expert,
I have an error in R3 system when I confirm the goods receipt in EWM for inbound delivery
the error in SMQ2 is:
PALLET is an auxiliary packaging material and cannot be used as pack.mate
PALLET is a packaging matirial type VERP that I've create in in R3 and I have transfer via cif it in EWM.
We have the new EWM 7 and i check some OSS note for a programm error in transfering of pakaging material during the GR but they are available only for EWM 5 and they are not available for EWM 7.
Could you explain me if this error coul be caused by some customising settings or by some master data field.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best regards
Alessandro
Edited by: Alessandro Dapiaggi on Jan 29, 2009 5:11 PM

Hi
I am not sure of your problem since there may be quite a few reasons why this would happen. However just try one thing - change the Packing material category from "auxaliary packing material" to "packing material" in Define Packaging Material Types under logistics general--->HU Management ---> Basics for the packing material type you are using in VERP and then create a new packing material and try the inbound delivery. It may work
Thanks
DJ

Splitting the goods receipt qty at the time of COR6N

Hello Friends,
Actually we want to do auto goods receipt at the time of confirmation (cor6n).I have given the PI03 control key to the operation and phase.So system shows the goods receipt item in goods movement screen in COR6N.
We manage all the materials in batches.So i want to split the goods receipt qty into no. of batches.
In cor6n,in goods movement there is option for splitting, but at a time it allows me to split the qty once only.If i have to split the qty again than again i have to select the splitting option .
i want to split at a time.How to do it/

Hi Jitendra,
It can be doing Batch Determination.I don't want to tell you to perform Batch Determination if you don't want.Just press icon for Batch Determination and no strategy found then do it Batch Determination without Class Selection.
System will propose all available batches.Here split required qty as per your choice. and then press copy button.
Regards,
Dhaval

Substitution - Baseline Date to be replaced by the Goods Receipt date

Dear Forum,
We have the payment terms defined in the system, with the baseline date corresponding to the 'Document Date' and the credit terms as 60 Days. The users now desire that the Baseline Date should instead correspond to the Goods Receipt Date. To enable this we need to define the substitution such as the Baseline Date at the time of Invoice Verification gets substituted by the Goods Receipt Date, if the GR Date is earlier than the IV date.
Would appreciate help from the friends as to how to configure this and which feilds to be chosen and replaced.
Thanks!
Regards,

Hi
You can make the Baseline Date in Invoice (MIRO) with Goods Receipt Date using BADI.
BADI -->MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS
Tell your ABAP Guy to work on this BADI.
In the BADI, MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS Read the Value in WEBUD of Internal Table TI_DRSEG and Pass it into E_ZFBDT.
Also if the Baseline Date is changed manually, then after posting you can see the Goods Receipt Date in Baseline Date.
This resolves your issue.
regards
venkat

Is that possible to allow the Good Receipt on customized return Mvt Type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for