Is there a multi-user sales of Lion upgrade in Appstore?

You could by a family package of 5 at a discount for past OS systems like Leopard. Is that available for Lion, from appstore or other spot?
Jim....

duh... I thought they would restrict per computer, but this make me since I was a bit at the cost of all the other software upgrades on my 5 macs. Thanks!

Similar Messages

Is there a multi-user for mountain lion

is there a option to download multi-user OS package

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4854?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Multiple user accounts and lion upgrade

Anyone with experience with Lion upgrade and having multiple(4) user accounts on Snow Leopard 10.6.8?

Upgrading Snow Leopard to Lion only affects the system software. The /Users/ folder remains untouched.

Can't access users after Mountain Lion upgrade

After upgrading my mini to Mountain lion, there were no options to sign in as my old user. instead, I had to make a new user and the old ones are not accessable. I can see the users but they don't come up in system prefs. How can I get my old user back?

1. You will need to boot to recovery holding cmd + R pressed in .
2. You will come in Mac os X utilities , will have 4 options in your screen , ( put back from timemachine, reinstall et..)
3. you go to ulitities on the top bar of your screen select terminal .
4. Type in Terminal : resetpassword ( this needs to be without any space between it) then press enter
5. new screen opens on the back --> selec macintosh hd and then the user and now you can enter new password
issue resolved.

Multi-seat Leopard to Lion upgrade... thanks a lot Apple!

So, if I understand Apple's stance that Lion will only be available through the Mac App Store, and that the Mac App Store is only available on the latest version of Snow Leopard, then my job to upgrade my company's 10 Macs has just become a nightmare!
On EACH Mac, I must:
upgrade to Snow Leopard (about 30 mins?)
download and patch to latest Snow Leopard (another 30 mins?)
download Lion (4gb... on our broadband, that's about 4 hours)
run install (guessing another 30 mins again?)
So, you're seriously telling me that I will have to spend 5.5 hours upgrading EACH Mac individually? That's 55 HOURS!
Unless it's possible to copy the Lion installer, in which case the job becomes a little less onerous... except that Apple's business licensing for the Mac Store says that you can only install on the one Mac, and not all of your Macs like a home licence... so I'm guessing that I will have to download for each Mac.
ABSOLUTE BLEEDIN’ NIGHTMARE!
THIS IS A JOKE! Come on Apple - you HAVE to release the Lion installer on DVD!

The other thing is, anybody running an organization who decides to update their operating system the day it is released should be advised of known truths of releases:
1. They almost always are not compatible with every mission critical software, unless they just happened to pick every software that has been keeping up with Apple day to day.
2. A clone backup of their system is a must prior to any update. No telling if hardware or software issues might be lurking in the depths of the system that would surface upon an update.
3. Nobody said you can't do a network install once downloaded to one system, as long as certain licensing terms have been paid for and agreed to.
Wait until the July release before jumping to conclusions.

Is there any online Leopard/Snow leopard/Lion upgrade from tiger?

Just had to restore my iMac to factory settings but realised the Leopard disc that came with it are not for my machine.
Looking for a way to update it as I dont have the discs and dont mind paying to upgrade.

Leopard/10.5 is rather expensive, so if your Mac meets 10.6 requirements that'd be the way to go...
Leopard requirements/10.5.x...
    * Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5, or PowerPC G4 (867MHz or faster) processor
minimum system requirements
    * 512MB of memory (I say 1.5GB for PPC at least, 2-3GB minimum for IntelMacs)
    * DVD drive for installation
    * 9GB of available disk space (I say 30GB at least)
Classic/OS9 Apps no longer supported.
Trouble is Apple no longer sells it, check eBay & such for the Retail version, not the Gray Discs...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/leopardassist/
http://lowendmac.com/osx/leopard/unsupported.html
List of Applications Not Compatible with Leopard...
http://guides.macrumors.com/List:Applications_Not_Compatible_with_Leopard
First you need to research all the problems people are having with the higher OSX versions, & make sure you have a bootable clone of what you have just in case.
then you must get 10.6 if they still have it, install it & update to 10.6.8 so you have the App Store to buy & download the huge 10.8 Installer.
Snow Leopard/10.6.x Requirements...
General requirements
   * Mac computer with an Intel processor
    * 1GB of memory (I say 4GB at least, more if you can afford it)
    * 5GB of available disk space (I say 30GB at least)
    * DVD drive for installation
    * Some features require a compatible Internet service provider; fees may apply.
    * Some features require Apple’s MobileMe service; fees and terms apply.
Which apps work with Mac OS X 10.6?...
http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/
It's been pulled from the online store & Apple Stores, so you have to call Apple to buy it, last I heard.
Call Apple Sales...in the US: 1-800-MY-APPLE.

Multi user concept of same jsp page

i have a problem i the jsp page used when there are multi users for the same page.....example when 2 users login at the same time..the id for the second user is same as the first one is displayed but his original id..what can be done for this..please help me out as soon as possible its very urgent

Your posting is a little hard to understand...but if I am guessing your problem is that you have two users whose data is being shown to the other user... the problem could be either of the following:
1. If you used a bean to hold the data, your scope for the bean is set incorrectly...you may have it at "Application" when it should have been "Session".
2. If you used a JSP variable to hold the value, you declared it as static by using <! String x = "myString"; />
Good luck.

Trying to access Lion server remote using multi-user access, but from a legacy Leopard system

Just purchased a mini server running Lion, and got screen sharing working fine from my legacy system (32-bit so Leopard only). However, I would like to run in multi-user mode, so someone can use the Lion system and another person can access their own account, from the older Leopard system, at the same time. Using multi-user rather than screen sharing. But Leopard does not have the option on the Finder/Share Screen command, the pop-up window to select screen sharing or new virtual session. So, is there a way still to run a new virtual session from a remote client running Leopard? Since the multi-user capability resides on the Lion server, it should be possible, but how, without the pop-up menu?
Message was edited by: Kurt-Syracuse

Hey. I suggest you check out http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9839785#9839785, where there are a couple solutions posted in regard to the error code -36 when connecting to a samba share. Good luck!
Jeremy A.
Tekserve Intern

I am a new mac user and I switch to mac due to the graphics that it brings. I do website in pc and I heard iweb is the best.NOW i heard that iweb will be discontinue. so what is the best application there for website using MAC OSX lion?

I am a new mac user and I switch to mac due to the graphics that it brings. I do website in pc and I heard iweb is the best.NOW i heard that iweb will be discontinue. so what is the best application there for website using MAC OSX lion?

It is now confirmed that iWeb, and iDVD, has been discontinued by Apple. This is evidenced by the fact that new Macs are shipping with iLife 11 installed but without iWeb and iDVD.
On June 30, 2012 MobileMe will be shutdown. However, iWeb will still continue to work but without the following:
Features No Longer Available Once MobileMe is Discontinued:
◼ Password protection
◼ Blog and photo comments
◼ Blog search
◼ Hit counter
◼ MobileMe Gallery
All of these features can be replaced with 3rd party options.
I found that if I published my site to a folder on my hard drive and then uploaded with a 3rd party FTP client subscriptions to slideshows and the RSS feed were broken. If I published directly from iWeb to the FPT server those two features continued to work correctly.
There's another problem and that's with iWeb's popup slideshows. Once the MMe servers are no longer online the popup slideshow buttons will not display their images.
Click to view full size
However, Roddy McKay and I have figured out a way to modify existing sites with those slideshows and iWeb itself so that those images will display as expected once MobileMe servers are gone. How to is described in this tutorial: #26 - How to Modify iWeb So Popup Slideshows Will Work After MobileMe is Discontinued.
It now appears that the iLife suite of applications offered on disc is now a discontinued product and the remaining supported iApps will only be available thru the App Store from now on. However, the iLife 11 boxed version that is still available at the online Apple Store (Store button at the top of the page) and those still on the shelves of retailers will include iWeb and iDVD. Those two apps were listed in small, gray text on the iLife 11 box that I bought.
Personally, if I didn't already have a copy I would purchase one to have it for reinstallation purposes if ever needed.
This might be of some interest to you at this time: Life After MobileMe.
OT

Aperture as a Multi-User Digital Asset Management Tool

Does anyone have any experience using Aperture in a multi-user environment? I'm trying to compare it to Cumulus by Canto which is designed as a multi-user tool.
I realize that each user would have a copy of Aperture on their Mac, but are there other issues that are not such as multi-variable searching capabilities of one versus the other. My gut tells me that Cumulus is more robust and can handle much larger libraries as well as all types of digital data and can search within document such as InDesign for a particular image.
Thanks
--Mitch

There is no possible way you can use Cumulus and
actually save money.
I don’t expect to save money. I expect to save time finding info, and avoiding duplication of almost everything we have
Stepping into digital asset management is a far bigger
issue than your boss can imagine. Try not to take this
personally, but your initial question about using
Aperture as an enterprise or workgroup DAM suggests you
have no idea what you're suggesting or possibly getting
into. Canto is all smoke and mirrors unless you can
afford the training and have dedicated, competent and
engaged support personnel.
Nothing taken personally. The question was asked because management is promoting Aperture as the end-all and be-all of imagement, whereas I’m looking for a tool to manage all our documents
Before you go much further, you need to understand
databases and you need to understand that DAM's return
on investment is not about saving money, it's about
preventing the spending of money; a huge difference and
there are few mgrs who can parse that difference from
the sales hype. Buy a copy of "The DAM Book" and try to
get someone to explain databases, cataloging
applications and server-based storage to you.
I understand databases quite well, but I will get a copy of the book you mentioned. I am running an Xserve in my environment, so I do understand servers and OS X Server.
I wish you tremendous luck and hope your experiences
are better than most of the Canto customers I have ever
met, including me. You just have no idea how expensively
wrong your decision to employ Cumulus could turn out to
be. Not that it's a bad product (although we thoroughly
despise it); it's sold as a miracle. Cumulus is a
supremely complex (not necessarily complicated),
over-designed and totally un-Macintosh application.
What version of Cumulus are you using, and why are you so unhappy with it? May I contact you off line to discuss this?
Thanks for the reply
—Mitch

I need a true multi-user contact management that do not involve the web

I have over 11,000+ contact in my contact data base and it is getting really slow, especailly when it try to update with iCloud. I need a true multi-user contact management that do not involve the web. i.e. I prefer thety sync as most of the time, I do not have access to internet at all! I would perfer it wil work with apple contact in some way, but I need a robust contact data base... sort of the older style CRM without the web, but with sneaker net ablity and true client server speed! I really do not feel like wriitng it in a relationship data base and do the hard work and prefer to just pay and get a top notch product. Address book server seems to be great except I am running moutain lion and it does not work under that OS!
Any suggesytino would be sincerely appreciated.

As my friends above have pointed out, the sweet spot on the JVC is the size of a postage stamp; move a few degrees in any direction and the image takes a trip into the dumper. Even that can be worked with except when you're cheek to jowl with a producer and dp - one of whom had extremely bad breath - looking over a cut for approval. The screen is incredibly reflective so you'll see something from the next county over. Other than these two rather large problems, the imaging of the JVC looks nice.
The Flanders are decent products and I would like to see them in use other than the horrid conditions at NAB, but I wouldn't go overboard with praise for them like some of the grazers do on the Creative Cow. They have a 30 day no questions asked return policy and that gives you a chance to use them which is nice. I really hate their big white logo, if I was to get one I'd have them remove it first.
$3,000 to $4,000? You really want my opinion? Find a good used Sony BVM or Ikegami HTM, something with low hours on the tube or something that has been recently retubed. Those animals are still out there. Maybe by the time it dies all this flat panel bs may have worked itself out.

Unable to add/remove users in Mountain Lion Server (Options are greyed out)

For some reason, im unable to add/remove users in Mountain Lion server. The + and - are greyed out. It seems like something is wrong with the permissons because it looks like it cant write the the Ldav3 file (although that may be speculation). Does anyone have any advice for me? I URGENTLY need to add users.
Maybe theres a way to restore default permssions for the boot drive (if that in fact is the issue). Hopefully there is a way that I can fix this while leaving all users, groups, their permissions and shares intact.

Anything interesting and relevent in the server logs?
Anything interesting in the server alerts?
Since it's far and away the most common cause of problems with OS X Server and with distributed authentication (Open Directory is entirely based on network encryption and digital certificates and on responses from your local DNS server(s)), verify your local DNS configuration is working and requires no changes with the following Terminal.app (Applications > Utilities) harmless, diagnostic command:
sudo changeip -checkhostname
sudo requires an administrative password. You might get a one-time warning about the sudo, and that can safely be ignored. The command will display some details, and indicate whether the local configuration appears valid and no changes are required, or further diagnostics for (most) common errors that can arise.

File Discrepancies for Multi Users

Hi ...
We are running RH7 and RSC3.1 with 3 users - We identified
(only yesterday) that after User 1 had deleted one topic file from
Project Manager and added several others ... User 2 and 3 had
broken links for these topics.
We are able to update existing topics by one user, who check
in, then user 2 and 3 can get the latest version and instantly view
the changes - lovely!! Exactly what we would expect ...
But the same is not occurring when we remove or add entire
topics to both the Project Manager and the TOC ...
User 2 and 3 see the topics in the TOC with the dreaded red
cross through them ... and have to try and locate the file or
restore broken links etc ... to get their view of the project in
sync with User 1. This seems to defeat the whole purpose of being
able to have a multi user authoring environment????
A major concern of this problem appears to be the risk of
undoing each others work by potentially restoring files that
another user intended to remove ...
Is anyone else experiencing similar issues ... we are in a
big organisation and are very restricted in terms of our ability to
access the servers etc ... but I want to know if there is something
we should be checking or doing differently from an application
perspective? Any advice or ideas are greatly appreciated...
Many thanks ...
Frustrated!

Hi Fi@qldpol, and welcome to the board. With your situation,
there are two likely possibilities:
1. Was your project added to source control via RoboHelp, or
was it initially added using RoboSource Control? If it was added
from RoboSource Control, then that is the problem.
2. If #1 is not the problem, then you might be having
problems with some of the users' CPD files. First, have everyone
make backups of the local version of their project (the files
actually residing on their PCs). Then have User 2 and User 3 delete
their copy of the project, and replace it with a copy of User 1's
local files. Before they open the project, they should delete the
cpd and pss files. After they delete those files, they can open the
project as usual and let the cpd file rebuild. We have to do this
every so often with some of our projects to get everyone
synchronized.
Hope that helps.
G

10.6.2 SMB - QB 2005 PC won't run in Multi User

Hi there,
This is a pretty specific issue but i'll throw this out anyway.
I setup a brand new 10.6.2 server alongside our old 10.4.11 server.
I cloned the contents of the "shared data" from the old box to the new one.
We have had the SMB service running for Quickbooks 2005 running on 2 PCs (Xp Pro clients), shared via QB's "Multi User" mode.
The new server's SMB share, identical in permissions etc to the old one, will not allow QB to open the file in Multi User mode. It gives an error to the effect of "Your company file has been damaged". My attempts to repair the QB file had no effect.
If I copy the same company file back onto our old Tiger Server's SMB share, it works fine. I assume this is simply a difference in Samba versions, but I have no idea how to troubleshoot it.
I obviously have a workaround for now, but it's less than ideal to have an entire Xserve on to share a Quickbooks file.
Any insight would be appreciated.
~p

Bumped into this article; I'll post back after i give it a shot.
http://edoceo.com/liber/network-samba-quickbooks
The gist of it:
"the directories that will be the root of the share must be owned by the group that the users who will access are in and they must be able to write"

How to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1 and 6.1 server..(Urgently)

Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Hi. A JDBC connection pool is a set of identical, interchangeable, pre-made
connections, and the controls to make sure only one user uses a particular
connection at any one time. If you want to have different DBMS users, you can
have a separate pool for each DBMS user, which may contain as many or few
connections as you want. Some applications has a pool for the accounting
applications, and another for the sales applications etc. Some do have a
separate pool for john, jane, joe etc, each with one connection. Pools
can be created and destroyed dynamically using the dynamic pool API.
Joe
softstar wrote:
>
Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Is there a multi-user sales of Lion upgrade in Appstore?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for