ISE 1.2 Sponsor Portal- Account Expiration Date Defaults to same time as Start Date

We have a time profile setup for ISE Sponspr Portal with Start/End.  I understand this allows the sponsor to specifially set the start and end time for the guest account.  When creating an account, the Start/End time is the same time.  If a Sponsor forgets to set the end time, then the guest account will be created, but will expire not allowing the guest to login.  It would be nice to have the end time default to something other than the start time, like 8 hours default.  Is this possible?  Can the expiration time default to something like 8 hours, but still give the Sponsor the ability to adjust the start/end times if needed?  This is very simple, and I cannot believe this is not available.

Beginning with Cisco ISE 1.2 time profiles are referred to as the account duration in the Sponsor portal.
Cisco ISE 1.2 includes these default time profiles, which replace the profiles available previously:
DefaultFirstLoginEight—the account is available for 8 hours starting when the guest user first successfully connects to the Guest portal. This replaces the DefaultFirstLogin time profile.
DefaultEightHours—the account is available for 8 hours starting when sponsors first create the account. This replaces the DefaultOneHour time profile.
DefaultStartEnd—sponsors can specify dates and times on which to start and stop network access.
Upon expiration of their account per their assigned time profile, they will no longer be able to login or access the company network.
If a guest were to return to the network, the sponsor can change the account duration via the sponsor portal to grant them access again and then require them to change their password if deemed necessary (depending on the settings). Changing account duration can be used for extending a guest users access longer than the original setup.
If you upgrade to Cisco ISE 1.2, the older time profiles are still available, but you can delete them if you are not using them. If the older time profiles are assigned to a sponsor group, a message alerts you before deleting. If you perform a new installation of Cisco ISE 1.2, only the new time profiles display.

Similar Messages

  • Remote and direct update of master data at the same time

    Hello
    Is it possible to do remote and direct update of master data at the same time? If yes where it could be used?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    What do you mean by Remote Update ?
    regards
    Happy Tony

  • How can I do to acquire and save date in the same time and in the same file when I run continual my VI without interrupti​on.

    I've attached a VI that I am using to acquire amplitude from Spectrum analyzerse. I tried to connect amplitude ouput to the VI Write Characters To File.vi and Write to Spreadsheet File.vi. Unfortunately when I run continual this VI without interruption, labview ask me many time to enter a new file name to save a new value.
    So, How can I do to aquire and save date in the same time and in the same file when I run continual my VI for example during 10 min.
    Thank you in advance.
    Regards,
    Attachments:
    HP8563E_Query_Amplitude.vi ‏37 KB

    Hi,
    Your VI does work perfectly. Unfortunately this not what I want to do. I've made error in my last comment. I am so sorry for this.
    So I explain to you again what I want to do exactly. I want to acquire amplitude along road by my vehicle. I want to use wheel signal coming from vehicle to measure distance along road. Then I acquire 1 amplitude each 60 inches from spectrum analyzer.
    I acquire from PC parallel port a coded wheel signal coming from vehicle (each period of the signal corresponds to 12 Inches). Figure attached shows the numeric signal coming from vehicle, and the corresponding values “120” and “88” that I can read from In Port vi.
    So I want to acquire 1 time amplitude from spectrum analyser each 5
    period of the signal that I am acquiring from parallel port.
    So fist I have to find how can I count the number of period from reading the values “120” and “88” that I am acquiring from In Port (I don’t know the way to count a number of period from reading values “120” and “88”).
    Here is a new algorithm.
    1) i=0 (counter: number of period)
    2) I read value from In Port
    3) If I acquire a period
    i= i+1 (another period)
    4) If i is multiple of 5 (If I read 5 period)
    acquire 1 time amplitude and write to the same
    file this amplitude and the corresponding distance
    Distance = 12*i). Remember each period of signal
    Corresponds to 12 Inches).i has to take these
    values: 5,10,15,20,25,35,40,45,50,55,60............
    5) Back to 2 if not stop.
    Thank you very much for helping me.
    Regards,
    Attachments:
    Acquire_Amplitude_00.vi ‏59 KB
    Figure_Algorithm.doc ‏26 KB

  • Requested end date must be later than requested start date in Service Request

    Hello Experts
                          I am getting this error in the service request when the date displayed in UI is
    Requested start date-06.05.2014
    Requested End-08.05.2014
    I have searched this error in the SCN, many people  have posted this error . I have not got any satisfactory answer in the posts. I am attaching screenshot in the post.
    I am configuring the service request.Please reply as its urgent
    Thanks all of experts in advance

    Hello Ashik
    I am facing a new problem please help
    I am currently working on service request.I am facing a problem in the date management there.In my service request i have 5 statuses .One of my status is "Pending with consumer".I am using duration settings of service request.By duration settings , i am calculating the duration for which its pending with consumer.I am having 2 response profile one is 24*7 and other is having 9 working hours.In the service request from the SLA configuration i am calculating the escalation date & Time .I need to add the pending with consumer duration with the escalation date and time.I am facing a problem , i am explaining whole problem ..
    Let say if the pending with consumer duration is  1440 minutes(that is 24 hours) .I am adding the minutes to the escalation date through the date rule.
    I am facing problem that if the service profile is 24*7 then there is no problem but if it is having the 9 hours working service profile then after adding the minutes to it the escalation date is changing to 4 days ahead which is wrong.
    I need to add only those minutes for which it is pending with consumer in working hours for the 9 hours service profile
    I need to dynamically determine the working hours from the duration then add it to escalation dates when the status is changed from pending with consumer.
    Please suggest a badi will work or how to do it.Its urgent as i need to give demo.I will appreciate a quick reply.Please reply

  • Requested end date must be later than requested start date

    Hi,
    I am getting an error after the creating the support ticket as "Requested end date must be later than requested start date".
    Please advise the solution.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Kumar.R

    Hi Raj,
    If you look for this message in DEBUG, youu2019ll find, that it is raised in functional module CRM_DATES_SERVICE_IR. That FM is called if your date type equals to constants GC_APPOINTMENT_TYPE-SRV_CUST_BEG (SRV_CUST_BEG) or GC_APPOINTMENT_TYPE-SRV_CUST_END (SRV_CUST_END).
    So, I can say that itu2019s some kind of standard check inside CRM core, and you canu2019t turn it off.
    And the workaround variants are listed earlier:
    -     You can fill the date SRV_CUST_END with some rule as Mohammed has suggested (even with dumb ISM_INFINITE which will put 31.12.9999 and it will be obvious that user didnu2019t change it)
    -     You can move to Z* date types, like you said, and checku2019s wonu2019t run
    -     And finally, you can try to delete this error message using BADI method CRM_APPT_CHECK_DEPENDENCIES, CRM_APPOINTMENT_BADI (as I remember it runs after this standard check). But I wouldnu2019t recommend doing it, because CRM_DATES_SERVICE_IR could be called not only in this moment and errors could appear in random placesu2026
    Best Regards,
    Vadim Shmarin

  • ISE 1.1 sponsor portal different type of guest accounts

    Hi there
    I just played around with the ISE 1.1.2.145 sponsor portal. I have the following 3 requirements, but I don't see a way the get there with the actuals sponsor portal features:
    1. I would like to create a event user (one single user for multiple logins) with a given username and a given password
    2. I would like to create a single user with a given username and a given password
    3. How can I change the password of such a user
    At the moment I am a little disappointed from the sponsor portal, there are not that features or I can't see the way to get there ;-)
    Can anybody confirm the above problems?
    Best regards
    Dominic

    It is possible to use internal users as well as AD users for admin.
    I'm not actually sure whetehr it's possible to stop using Internal Users.
    I have it working using both, primarily as I don't have AD credentials on customer site, so they use AD credentials and I stick to using Internal Admin User.
    I still haven't understood your original question entirely, but if you select the guest username to be created based on email address (rather than first name/last name), then you can create a single username using a fictional email address, and allow the user to change the password on first login. You can then change the password to whatever you want.
    Does that fit?

  • ISE 1.2 sponsor portal - disabling default languages

    Hi,
    We are implementing Cisco ISE 1.2 and have a question on the sponsor portal languages.
    The client company's official language is English and so we would like to disable all other languages from the sponsor portal. If we don't do it, the users might select their native language (on the sponsor settings and/or the guest notification language) meaning that we have to customize and maintain all 15 language templates.
    It has alread happened during the tests: a sponsor created a guest account and choose a notification language other than English - the SMS was not sent because the "Destination" on the "SMS text message notification" default value is "[email protected]".
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Telmo Oliveira

    Hi all,
    This reply to myself is done for documentation proposes, it can help someone with the same challenge.
    Today I was at an event at Cisco where ISE 1.3 beta was presented. This version will have already the option to choose between browser locale or static language template. Talking to the Cisco eng. responsible for the presentation, he told me that 1.2 had no way to do it.
    Cisco ISE 1.3 is now planned to be release end of 2014.
    Regards,
    Telmo Oliveira

  • ISE 1.3 Sponsor Portal mandatory fields

    Hello,
    in the ISE 1.2 version it was possible to say that some fields are mandatory like first name or company.
    I cannot find this setting in the ISE 1.3 version.
    Regards
    filip

    Leoni,
    These settings are found by going to Guest Access > Configure.  Select Sponsor Portals and choose the Sponsor Portal in which you are working.  Click Portal Page Customization
    Once there, select your Guest Type.  I chose Create Account for Known Guests.  Then choose Settings over the preview image.
    Please Rate Helpful posts and mark this question as answered if, in fact, this does answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post follow-up questions.
    Charles Moreton

  • ISE 1.2 Sponsor portal port change not working

    Hi,
    Has anyone else had an issue where they change the default port number of the sponsor portal on the Admin node, all ISE restart, but the sponsor portal still only works on the default 8443 port?
    Thanks,
    Ct

    Hi,
    As you know that default port is 8443, but you can change this value so ensure that the same value you assign to the switch and it matches the setting in Cisco ISE.

  • ISE 1.2 Sponsor Portal issue

    Hi
    we have an ISE version 1.2 installation and are trying to customise the Sponsor Portal login page to show the Terms and conditions for staff whan accessing the page, by using the display pre-loign banner under the sponsor portal themes settings.
    We have added the text for both pre and post login banners and have selected the check boxes for both but for some reason when saved the text does not display and the check boxes show as being un checked when going back to the page. Is this a bug ?? i have reset to factory defulats and re tried but still not working.. any help would be appreciated

    It may be a browser issue. Please check the supported Operating Systems and Browsers for Sponsor, Guest, and My Devices Portals:
    These Cisco ISE portals support the following operating system and  browser combinations. These portals require that you have cookies  enabled in your web browser.
    Table 8     Supported Operating Systems and Browsers
    Supported Operating System Browser Versions
    Google Android 1 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 4.0, 3.2.1, 3.2, 2.3.6, 2.3.3, 2.2.1, 2.2
    •Native browser
    Apple iOS 6, 5.1, 5.0.1, 5.0
    •Safari 5, 6
    Apple Mac OS X 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8
    •Mozilla Firefox 3.6, 4, 5, 9
    •Safari 4, 5, 6
    •Google Chrome 11
    Microsoft Windows 82
    •Microsoft IE 10
    Microsoft Windows 73
    •Microsoft IE 9
    •Mozilla Firefox 3.6, 5, 9
    •Google Chrome 11
    Microsoft Windows Vista, Microsoft Windows XP
    •Microsoft IE 6, 7, 8
    •Mozilla Firefox 3.6, 9
    •Google Chrome 5
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5
    •Mozilla Firefox 3.6, 4, 5, 9
    •Google Chrome 11
    Ubuntu
    •Mozilla Firefox 3.6, 9

  • ISE 1.3 Sponsor Portal problem

    Hello Guys,
    I configured one Guest WLAN to authenticate via ISE Web Portal.
    The wlan, the redirect, everything is working fine. Y
    Yesterday i created one user and password using the sponsor portal normally, but today, i tried to connect on the sponsor page and i got the error:
    Sponsor Portal Internal Error
    Please contact System Administrator. If you are the System Administrator please consult the logs.
    I tried to restart the application ise via cli but didin't works.
    Can you help me? Where these logs are located?
    Thank you.

    Look at you Rafael, coming up with problems and solving them yourself! :) Thanks for sharing the solution with everyone (+5 from me). Let's close the thread if the issue is resolved :)

  • ISE 1.3 Sponsor Portal.

    Hi There, Just trying out ISE Version 1.3 and encountering some issues getting access to the sponsor portal.
    Just checking about a Standalone deployment is it OK to have the sponsor portal interface the same as you manage the ISE from?
    I cant seem to get to the sponsor portal on 8443 it just doesn't display the page. It doesn't even fill out the URL at the end.
    When I fill in the URL for it. I get this.
    The Portal is set up like this So from what I see it should work. If I use the preview button in the portal set up I can get to it fine. Am I missing something?

    Graham,
    I've seen this a few times.  Do you have separate PSNs?  Note that the DNS entry (Alias) for the Sponsor Portal needs to point to a PSN and NOT the Admin Node.  This usually fixes the issue.  Create an alias in DNS for sponsor.domain.com (replace domain.com to reflect your domain name) and point it to a PSN.  Then type sponsor.domain.com into your browser.  The system will redirect to the default Sponsor Portal.
    Note this Capture from the ISE 1.3 Admin Guide:
    The full guide can be found here:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-3/admin_guide/b_ise_admin_guide_13.pdf
    Please Rate Helpful posts and mark this question as answered if, in fact, this does answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post follow-up questions.
    Charles Moreton

  • Account based COPA datsource taking long time to extract data

    Hi
    We have created a Account based COPA datasource but it is not extracting data in RSA3 even though the underlying tables have data in it.
    If the COPA datasource is created using fields only from CE4 (segment ) and not CE1 (line items ) table then it extracts data but tat too after very long time.
    If the COPA datasource is created using fields from CE4 (segment ) and  CE1 (line items ) table then it does not extarct any records and RSA3 gives a time out error..
    Also job scheduled from BW side for extracting data goes on for days but does not fetch any data and neither gives any error.
    The COPA tables have huge amount of data and so performance could be a issue. But we have also created the indexes on them. Still it is not helping.
    Please suggest a solution to this...
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    Hi Gaurav
    Check this note 392635 ,,might be usefull
    Regards
    Jagadish
    Symptom
    The process of selecting the data source (line item, totals table or summarization level) by the extractor is unclear.
    More Terms
    Extraction, CO-PA, CE3XXXX, CE1XXXX, CE2XXXX, costing-based, account-based,profitability analysis, reporting, BW reporting, extractor, plug-in, COEP,performance, upload, delta method, full update, CO-PAextractor, read, datasource, summarization level, init, DeltaInit, Delta Init Cause and Prerequisites
    At the time of the data request from BW, the extractor determines the data source that should be read. In this case, the data source to be used depends on the update mode (full initialization of the deltamethod or delta update), and on the definition of the DataSources (line item characteristics (except for REC_WAERS FIELD) or calculated key figures) and the existing summarization levels.
    Solution
    The extractor always tries to select the most favorable source, that is,the one with the lowest dataset. The following restrictions apply:
    o Only the 'Full' update mode from summarization levels is
    supported during extraction from the account-based profitability
    analysis up to and including Release PI2001.1. Therefore, you can
    only everload individual periods for a controlling area. You can
    also use the delta method as of Release PI2001.2. However, the
    delta process is only possible as of Release 4.0. The delta method
    must still be initialized from a summarization level. The following
    delta updates then read line items. In the InfoPackage, you must
    continue to select the controlling area as a mandatory field. You
    then no longer need to make a selection on individual periods.
    However, the period remains a mandatory field for the selection. If
    you do not want this, you can proceed as described in note 546238.
    o To enable reading from a summarization level, all characteristics
    that are to be extracted with the DataSource must also be contained
    in this level (entry * in the KEDV maintenance transaction). In
    addition, the summarization level must have status 'ACTIVE' (this
    also applies to the search function in the maintenance transaction
    for CO-PA data sources, KEB0).
    o For DataSources of the costing-based profitability analysis,
    30.03.2009 Page 2 of 3
    SAP Note 392635 - Information: Sources with BW extraction from the CO-PA
    data can only be read from a summarization level if no other
    characteristics of the line item were selected (the exception here
    is the 'record currency' (REC_WAERS) field, which is always
    selected).
    o An extraction from the object level, that is, from the combination
    of tables CE3XXXX/CE4XXXX ('XXXX' is the name of the result area),
    is only performed for full updates if (as with summarization
    levels) no line item characteristics were selected. During the
    initialization of the delta method this is very difficult to do
    because of the requirements for a consistent dataset (see below).
    o During initialization of the delta method and subsequent delta
    update, the data needs to be read up to a defined time. There are
    two possible sources for the initialization of the delta method:
    - Summarization levels manage the time of the last update/data
    reconstruction. If no line item characteristics were selected
    and if a suitable, active summarization level (see above)
    exists, the DataSource 'inherits' the time information of the
    summarization level. However, time information can only be
    'inherited' for the delta method of the old logic (time stamp
    administration in the profitability analysis). As of PlugIn
    Release PI2004.1 (Release 4.0 and higher), a new logic is
    available for the delta process (generic delta). For
    DataSources with the new logic (converted DataSources or
    DataSources recreated as of Plug-In Release PI2004.1), the line
    items that appear between the time stamp of the summarization
    level and the current time minus the security delta (usually 30
    minutes) are also read after the suitable summarization level
    is read. The current time minus the security delta is set as
    the time stamp.
    - The system reads line items If it cannot read from a
    summarization level. Since data can continue to be updated
    during the extraction, the object level is not a suitable
    source because other updates can be made on profitability
    segments that were already updated. The system would have to
    recalculate these values by reading of line items, which would
    result in a considerable extension of the extraction time.
    In the case of delta updates, the system always reads from line
    items.
    o During extraction from line items, the CE4XXXX object table is read
    as an additional table for the initialization of the delta method
    and full update so that possible realignments can be taken into
    account. In principle, the CE4XXXX object table is not read for
    delta updates. If a realignment is performed in the OLTP, no
    further delta updates are possible as they would make the data
    inconsistent between OLTP and BW. In this case, a new
    initialization of the delta method is required.
    o When the system reads data from the line items, make sure that the
    30.03.2009 Page 3 of 3
    SAP Note 392635 - Information: Sources with BW extraction from the CO-PA
    indexes from note 210219 for both the CE1XXXX (actual data) and
    CE2XXXX (planning data) line item tables have been created.
    Otherwise, you may encounter long-running selections. For
    archiving, appropriate indexes are delivered in the dictionary as
    of Release 4.5. These indexes are delivered with the SAP standard
    system but still have to be created on the database.

  • Data not uploading in Time dependent Master data Infoobject

    Hello All,
    I have a master data infoobject for HR entity and have to load data from PSA to that info object.
    The HR entity infoobject already have sone data like below:
    HR Entity
    Version
    Date from
    Date To
    x
    A
    01.07.2013
    31.12.9999
    x
    A
    19.04.2013
    30.06.2013
    x
    A
    01.09.2012
    18.04.2013
    x
    A
    01.01.2012
    31.08.2012
    x
    A
    01.01.1000
    31.12.2011
    Now the data in PSA is as follows:
    HR Entity
    Start Date
    End Date
    X
    01.01.2012
    18.12.2013
    Once I loaded this data to the infoobject, i can not see this value which is the latest value of this HR entity.
    Can somebody please explain how the data gets loaded in the time dependent master data infoobject and why this entry is not getting loaded in the info object.
    Regards
    RK

    Hi,
    did you activate master data after your load?
    You can check also version 'M' records and see if your record is there.
    The load went green?
    The problem is, that your entry overlaps all exisitng time intervals, which can't be deleted or merged as there may be dependent transactional data. You have first to delete the transactional data for this entity.
    Then you can delete the time-dependent data and reoload it from your PSA.
    BW will build then correct time intervals.
    The easiest is to change the time interval in PSA, see example below:
    At the moment the time interval is not accepted. But you can add time intervalls before 31.12.2011 and after 01.07.2013, Then system will create remaiing time intervals, e.g. your new record is:
    HR Entity
    Start Date
    End Date
    X
    01.08.2013
    18.12.2013
    Result will be:
    HR Entity
    Version
    Date from
    Date To
    x
    A
    19.12.2013
    31.12.9999
    x
    A
    01.08.2013
    18.12.2013
    x
    A
    01.07.2013
    31.07.2013
    Regards, Jürgen

  • Multiple hierarchial structuring for Accounts that apply at the same time to a document

    Use Case:
    There are 2 ways of logically grouping entities for our UCM Accounts permission:
    For external Partner users (one  taxonomy applies) 
    @Corp/Partner1, @Corp/Partner1(Region 1)   are valid accounts that can be assigned to users so that they get access to documents owned by all their Subsidiary companies or specifically their company - Partner in Region 1.
    For internal users (both taxonomy applies),
    @Corp/Region1, @Corp/Region 1/Partner 1(Region 1)   are valid accounts that can be assigned to be users so that they get access to documents owned by all Partners in Region1 or  specifically Partner1  in Region 1.
    @Corp/Partner1, @Corp/Partner1(Region 1)   are valid accounts that can be assigned to users so that they get access to documents owned by all the Subsidiary companies of Partner 1 or specifically Partner in Region 1.
    Question:
    At the document level in UCM, looks like only one Account structure can be tagged. Given that,
    How can we deign this using Accounts so that both taxonomies are supported at the same time to provision security for both internal and external users?
    Do we have to use ACLs (Role Entity ACL component) as that is the only one that seems to be support multiple roles with OR condition? If so, can we totally bypass Accounts to only use Role Entity ACLs without performance impact?

    Hi user11282566
    Please refer http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/doc.1111/e10792/c05_security.htm#CSMSP569 and it makes the statement mentioned below
    When accounts are used, the account becomes the primary permission to satisfy before security group permissions are applied. You can also think of a user's access to a particular document as the intersection between their account permissions and security group permissions.
    Ideally, you can use any of the combination. But when you enable accounts, security model gets update like - every content should belong to some security group and account. And account should be the primary condition to satisfy before security group permissions are evaluated. So this might make you different security groups for different context based on your requirement. Please take care of this aspect.
    I've not used Oracle Document Cloud yet, so cant comment on security model. Below links from a-team might provide you some pointers
    http://www.ateam-oracle.com/integrating-with-documents-cloud-using-a-text-editor-as-an-example/
    http://www.ateam-oracle.com/calling-oracle-documents-cloud-service-rest-apis-from-webcenter-content-custom-components/
    If you''ve an instance you can sign-up for oracle document cloud and try some test cases.

Maybe you are looking for