ISE low impact mode/Closed/Monitor

Can we put the the profiles one by one into closed mode in ISE
for example:
You have three rules
Group A---Switch A---DOT1X-- Low impact mode
Group B--Swicth A--DOT1X---Closed Mode
Group c-- Switch A-- DOT1X-- Monitor Mode.
- Now, after testing Low-impact mode and Monitor mode, one by one can we put them in closed mode?
Can we accomplish this, Rule by rule?
Minakshi

Deploying Monitor Mode first allows to step through all the issues, gaining visibility into successful and failed authentications, with minimal impact to the users and endpoints. Once issues have been addressed through Monitor Mode you can provide secured network access Closed Mode.
note :Closed Mode is recommended only for IT environments that are experienced with 802.1X deployments and have considered all the nuances that go along with it.In closed mode any traffic prior to authentication will be dropped, including DHCP, DNS, and Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) traffic.Make sure evry thing is sorted out

Similar Messages

ISE Endpoint losing IP after transition to Low-Impact-Mode

I've recently moved an ISE implementation into the low-impact authentication phase, and the client's security cameras are having a rough go of it. In monitor mode, they were able to stay connected as they should but in low-impact mode they are losing their IP addresses as evidenced in the auth session output below:
SWITCH-1#sh auth sess int g4/0/6            Interface: GigabitEthernet4/0/6          MAC Address: 0040.8cc7.4822           IP Address: 10.92.6.3            User-Name: 00-40-8C-C7-48-22               Status: Authz Success               Domain: DATA       Oper host mode: multi-domain     Oper control dir: both        Authorized By: Authentication Server          Vlan Policy: N/A              ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-5165e13c      Session timeout: 3600s (local), Remaining: 338s       Timeout action: Reauthenticate         Idle timeout: N/A    Common Session ID: 0AFF320A000661C965742D42      Acct Session ID: 0x00067E9F               Handle: 0x72000982Runnable methods list:       Method   State       dot1x    Failed over       mab      Authc SuccessSWITCH-1#sh auth sess int g4/0/6            Interface: GigabitEthernet4/0/6          MAC Address: 0040.8cc7.4822           IP Address: 169.254.45.196            User-Name: 00-40-8C-C7-48-22               Status: Authz Success               Domain: DATA       Oper host mode: multi-domain     Oper control dir: both        Authorized By: Authentication Server          Vlan Policy: N/A              ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-5165e13c      Session timeout: 3600s (local), Remaining: 338s       Timeout action: Reauthenticate         Idle timeout: N/A    Common Session ID: 0AFF320A000661C965742D42      Acct Session ID: 0x00067E9F               Handle: 0x72000982Runnable methods list:       Method   State       dot1x    Failed over       mab      Authc Success
This is happening approx. every 10 seconds which curiously is the timer value of my dot1x tx-period. As well, the host never has its reauthentication timer restarted but I can see the following in ISE approx. every 10-15 seconds:
Why is it going through Dynamic Authorization? Why am I losing my legitimate IP address every 10 seconds and getting an APIPA address in its place? The port configuration is as follows:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/6 description Security switchport access vlan 292 switchport mode access ip access-group ACL-DEFAULT in power inline auto max 15400 authentication event fail action next-method authentication host-mode multi-domain authentication open authentication order dot1x mab authentication priority dot1x mab authentication port-control auto authentication periodic authentication violation restrict mab dot1x pae authenticator dot1x timeout tx-period 10 storm-control broadcast level 2.00 storm-control action shutdown spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree bpduguard enableend
And my ACL-DEFAULT is...
Extended IP access list ACL-DEFAULT    10 permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps    20 permit udp any any eq domain    30 permit icmp any any    40 permit udp any any eq tftp    50 deny ip any any log
Upon switch log review, I'd noticed that the ACL-DEFAULT is blocking the cameras from certain igmp and tcp/554 (RTSP) communications. To see if it would help, even though I shouldn't have to, I placed ACE's into my ACL-DEFAULT to permit this traffic and would still drop my IP address every 10 seconds. I shouldn't have to do this because the "xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-5165e13c" is a simple "permit ip any any" ACL which should allow all of the traffic to flow.
Ideas?
Kind Regards,
Kevin

As well, the dACL is properly replacing the first "any" with the endpoint's IP:
SWITCH-1#show ip access-lists interface g4/0/6
     permit ip host 169.254.45.196 any
SWITCH-1#show ip access-lists interface g4/0/6
     permit ip host 10.92.6.3 any
Kind Regards,
Kevin

Critical vlan in low impact mode

Hello,
How is it possible managed a server radius failure when I'm using low impact mode and a port acl is applied ?
Is there a similar configuration like critical vlan used in high security mode ?
Regards,
Iarno
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Larno,
If you are still in low impact mode then you can leave the critical vlan as the same vlan as the access vlan then verify how the user was authorization by issuing a "show authentication sessions" command if you are going to place the users in a guest vlan or a vlan that has limited access then the port acl will only apply to the ingress traffic from the port not from any ACLs that exist on the L3 interface itself.
Thanks
Tarik Admani

Webcam not entering low-power mode after resume

Can other W520 owners with a webcam (and potentially other models) confirm whether or not the camera prevents the USB subsystem from entering low power mode?
1) Unplug all USB peripherals, and turn off Bluetooth (this runs on USB as well)
2) Put the system into standby, unplug the AC adapter, and resume the system on battery.
3) Load a Command Prompt and run powercfg -energy
4) Load the generated report and look for the following:
The most noticeable issue caused by this is unnecessarily high power consumption, and as a result, lower battery life.
Turning the camera on and off (using the Fn=F6 preview window) turns this off and returns power consumption to normal.
On the latest available BIOS, chipset, and camera drivers.
Would like someone to confirm whether this is a driver issue or if it's just my system.
W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

I have a very similar spec also. The pair of U2410's (updated revision A01) connected to it won't go into sleep mode (just go black, with backlight still on).
The pair of cheapie BenQ 2420HD's I had connected while I waited for the Dells went into sleep mode fine.
Someone on another forum noted that they had a different model Dell on Mac with the same problem, and he found it only happened when the USB uplink cable was connected to the Mac. I disconnected mine (uplink and down), but no change unfortunately.
Google searching seems to suggest this is almost exclusively only with a Dell/Mac combo (same monitor on PC works fine and other brands on Mac work fine). These U2410 monitors get an absolute bagging on most forums, and I think most of it is deserved. These will both be going back for a refund with severe blue/pink tints making them visually perform worse than the BenQ's that were 1/3 the price. What's the point of spending 2 to 3 times the amount on IPS monitors when they're off colour even right in front of them!
The HP 24" IPS uses the same crap LG panel as these Dells, I can't justify 2 x 30" Apple Cinema displays for AU$5000, and one just won't cut it. No simple answer it seems....
Cheers
Dav

Can't send to bus when in low latency mode?

My colleague and I have almost the same setup, except he is running OS X 10.8.5, and I'm running OS X 10.9.4, Both are running Logic X 10.0.7. He has Apogee hardware (Symphony 64 card to DA16X/AD16X), and I have a UA Apollo.
For some reason, this works on my setup, but not on his:
Set up a bus send on any audio or VI channel, and assign the output of that channel to outputs 3-4 (outputs 1-2 are both of our main outs). The purpose of this is to send to a cue/headphone box.
Set latency compensation to Instruments and Tracks (not ALL, setting it to ALL defeats this)
Turn on low-latency mode.
Turn on Software Monitoring (buffer is set to 64)
Record enable that track.
On my setup, I get signal on channels 3-4, on his, no signal as soon as record is enabled
Auto-input monitoring is off in both cases.
On my setup, the bus popup turns orange, but I still hear the signal, on his, it turns orange, but no signal.
All plugins removed on the track and the bus.
Weird.

Bus Send is set the same on both systems, Post Pan, Post Fader, Pre Fader ?
Good point, I'll check that
Bus is set to output on 3-4 ?
Yes, on both systems
Bus level is the same ?
Yes, similar anyway
Sure you friend doesn't have any plugins on the master output bus ?
I didn't consider that - somehow didn't think that plugins on the master bus (which is outputting on 1-2) could effect a different bus. Will check that tomorrow.
Do you by any chance have direct monitoring enabled on the Apollo, any input signal will be heard.
I do use direct monitoring on the Apollo, but that is not a factor - it's prerecorded material we are trying to monitor, not input signal.
Curious as to why are you running in Low Latency mode, it is for a specific purpose not something to be used in general recording/work.
He is running on an older Mac tower and uses a lot of plugins and prefers software monitoring, and finds that he has problems unless he enables low latency mode. I usually leave it off, I just wanted to see if the issue was present on my system as well, and it's not.
Thanks, will report back.

Low latency mode didn't bypass latent plugins, or turn them orange

in our case it was waves' bass rider plugin. we had low latency mode enabled, the plugin was bypassed even, and still it caused the entire output to be latent.
i was under the impression that low latency mode was supposed to bypass these things and turn them orange right?
our latency limit was set to zero as well.
ideas?

There are so many factors that affect latencey and if you're making your living or it''s really important, I'd roll up my sleeves and tackle this puppy head on. Do you have a really high track count? Are you running a lot of plug ins? What is the disk buffer size set to? What do you have the processing threads set to? How much RAM do you have? Are you using an external drive that's fighting to keep up? What sample rate are you running at........
I think you see where I'm going with this! It's a slippery slope my friend but nothing you can't figure out. It really all depends on understanding what you have and how best to optimize it for what you want to do. That's why a lot of the help forums can be so confusing because there isn't a simple answer that works for everyone.
In the meantime, if you really wanna just get to the business of making music try monitoring through your desk when you're tracking and only use the plugins for playback (disable software monitoring, but only if you have the hardware that will enable you to do so).
Good luck!

LaserJet MFP M175nw-- low energy mode or shut down?

I recently upgraded to an HP MFP175 nw. I use this printer in a home environment on a stand alone laptop. I don't need to print documents on a daily basis, which raises my question: Is there an advantage in leaving the printer on in it's sleep/low energy mode for hours or even days at a time when not in use or should it be completely powered down? I'm not concerned with the power draw in leaving it on and in doing so it avoids the re-initializing process that the printers has to go through each time it is powered on. Which is better or does it not really matter? thanks in advance.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Personally I leave my CP1525 on all the time and let the automatic power management take care of things. I think there is less stress on the unit this way and probably better toner life due to less initialization routines.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

Low latency mode doesn t work?

If I enable "Low latency Mode" nothing happens, Ioaded tons of Plugins and set the limit to 1 ms....Shouldnt it bypass some plugins? Someone who knows the problem

does it work for you?

Smartphones - Low Battery Mode?

Just woken up this morning, and my battery's only on 2 bars... which isn't a problem in itself, but it made me think of an idea lol
Wouldn't it be good if the phone could have an option to automatically switch to a 'Low Battery Mode' which would shut down all the fancy, battery intensive settings - bluetooth, fancy wallpapers & screensavers, active desktop, camera (or the camera switching on if the slide opens - the user must go to camera in the menu to activate
I'm sure there's a lot more that could be done with that, but I thought I'd throw it open for discussion here and see what people think... I'm sure it would be a valuable tool for people that just want their phone to last longer until they can get home to charge it.
Obviously if Nokia decide to use my idea after seeing this post, I'd love to take the credit for it :-p
Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

Thanks richcowell, that sounds like a good idea.
You'll certainly get credit here on the boards for posting the idea - however, here is an excerpt from the Membership terms:
License to Nokia for Any Submitted Content
By submitting, and upon such submission of, any information or materials such as feedback, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, answers, questions, comments, suggestions, scores, hints, strategies, concepts, designs, ideas, plans, orders, requests or the like, or any other material ("Content") to Nokia or through the Site(s) and Services, for example, by e-mail, SMS, and/or MMS, you license and grant Nokia and its affiliates and sub- licensees a non-exclusive, royalty-free and free of charge, perpetual, worldwide, irrevocable, and fully sub-licensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, communicate to the public, make available, publish, translate, copy, modify, adapt, create derivative works of, distribute, and display such Content or any concept described in it throughout the world in any media, product and/service, including, without limitation wireless devices, mobile phones and any related products, services and accessories, advertising, marketing and promotional materials, and digital reproductions, without compensation, restrictions on use, acknowledgement of source, accountability or liability, and with waiver of all moral rights and rights of attribution, integrity and identity.
I wrote all my posts from 2005-2011 as an "Admin" for this community. I still work for Nokia as an external consultant, so my rank in all posts is now "Employee".

Guest Portal Using ISE with Flexconnect Mode

Folks,
I have configured my guest web authentication using ISE with flexconnect mode like this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bcb905.shtml
After done, I connect the SSID but cannot log in. I cannot get IP address and in the ISE I can see that my device has already hit my authorization profile and the status is pending. Can anyone help me with this?

As Richard says, check to see if you have an IP address. If not check the AP settings for FlexConnect. Is the mode on the AP set right? Please confirm that you are using FC local switching and not centralised switching?
Is the VLAN tagging enabled on the AP, and/or the VLANs on the AP switchport set right?

Win10 defeating my system's low power modes

Both of these devices ran properly in their low-power modes under 8.1x64:
1) Radeon HD 7850 2GB--For some reason after a boot up, 10-20 minutes later, my GPU jumps from its low-power clocks of 300Mhz/150MHz (core/ram) to full power, and shows 92% GPU activity and appears "stuck" there. Removing all of the Win10
updates did not alleviate the problem as I was hoping for. This is the case regardless of AMD gpu driver used. But it gets better...
2) Not only is my GPU stuck on full throttle mode (even when doing nothing or else simply browsing), but my *CPU,* which under 8.1x64 ran fine with AMD's Cool'nQuiet power reduction modes (like Intel's Speed Step), *also* (at the same time) kicks up to *full
power* although set in Windows to fluctuate between 10% and 100% on a demand basis.
The only cure that works is to log off and then back on...which corrects the problem for about another 20-30 minutes before both devices go to full power again. Definitely something is strange in the Win10 Preview (which I upgraded from an 8.1 installation
with none of these problems.)
Now this may or may not be tied to the problem, but for some really oddball reason Windows10TP will not let me install two innocuous utilities I've used for years: CPU-Z & HWmonitor. Win10 claims these application are incompatible with it--yet,
these are only simple hardware identifying programs--and both ran without difficulty under 8.1x64.
Suggestions appreciated...!

Mike...Thanks for the reply! This is a real head-scratcher...;) I've used the last three drivers from AMD for the gpu--same result every time. All clocks in the system bios (UEFI) are set to default, and my Win10 install is UEFI (not legacy)
and the Secure Boot State is ON. All clocks are running at defaults. I also reinstalled the Win10TP updates as I determined they weren't the problem as it continued after I uninstalled them.
Yes, C'nQ it is enabled in the bios (as I mentioned, all of this stuff worked like a clock under 8.1x64)...and that's the weird thing...Win10TP...operates exactly like it should in relation to the low power modes for around 20-30 minutes--exactly like it
did in 8.1 all the time--and then for some inexplicable reason both devices jump to full power/full speed--as if something is running that demands the power/speed--but it isn't!
I've run differing browsers with hardware acceleration turned off; I've run nothing at all apart from normal boot-up running programs, and it makes no difference. Something is throwing these devices into max-power mode after 20-30 minutes from a boot/log-off/on
having occurred.
Motherboard is MSI G46-970a, UEFI version 2.6 (latest)
CPU is AMD FX-6300 @ stock speeds & voltages
8GBs DDR 3 running with stock timings and settings (2x4GB)
HIS HD 7850 2GB running @ stock speeds/voltages
I've all through the power savings options I'm using and can't find anything that might explain this--I keep going back to the fact that this never happened even once under 8.1, and I started with 8.0 in Jan '13 and have upgraded from there--never happened
with Win7x64, either (same hardware, same settings.)
I'm wondering if maybe I ought to be running the Enterprise version of Win10TP, but I can't really think of *why* that would make a difference with these symptoms...
If you think of anything else, I'm all ears...;)
Edit: BTW, I am Migration User 1...;) I hadn't signed in when I posted the original question--I suppose--although I didn't think I could post without being signed in...

Lion low-power mode and iTunes client

Potentially dumb question, but it may make a difference in when and/or how I update my home network for media...
I understand that OS X Lion includes a "low-power" mode, in that it's a partial wake-on-LAN that doesn't wake up the display, etc. I also know that an Apple TV can't stream media (movies, specifically) from an NAS type system without going through an iTunes client at some point (even if the NAS has an iTunes server built in).
So, my question is -- does Lion's wake-on-LAN work in this sort of situation? That is, if the computer is in sleep mode, but iTunes is running, will attempting the stream a movie from the NAS to an Apple TV "wake" the Mac to perform its duties, and if so, does it do so in the low-power mode that doesn't turn on the display?

Potentially dumb question, but it may make a difference in when and/or how I update my home network for media...
I understand that OS X Lion includes a "low-power" mode, in that it's a partial wake-on-LAN that doesn't wake up the display, etc. I also know that an Apple TV can't stream media (movies, specifically) from an NAS type system without going through an iTunes client at some point (even if the NAS has an iTunes server built in).
So, my question is -- does Lion's wake-on-LAN work in this sort of situation? That is, if the computer is in sleep mode, but iTunes is running, will attempting the stream a movie from the NAS to an Apple TV "wake" the Mac to perform its duties, and if so, does it do so in the low-power mode that doesn't turn on the display?

Enable "low color" mode in iTunes (no more Pink)

I use iTunes on a PC w/ Remote Desktop so I can control the music library from other computers in my house.
iTunes used to work great, now it requires 32-bit color.
Apple, can you add a preference to run in low-color mode and not turn pink?
Thanks,
Joe

Finally found a way to get more colors on a Windows XP host computer using Remote Desktop.
http://www.somelifeblog.com/2007/10/remote-desktop-video-32-bit-mode.html
You need to enable 24-bit color (max possible under XP as a host) using group policy.
iTunes is Pink no more in remote sessions.

Low latency mode: what's the sense?

I've read it bypasses plug ins which causes latency. But if it is so what'is the sense of this function? If I understand well in this mode I don't know exactly which plug in will work and which no....
I cannot accept a situation like this.
Apart from anything else I did use low latency mode (because I listened some latency after having inserted a plug) and I checked all the plugs during playback and they all seem to work. So?
I don't understand...

Usually I use Low Latency mode in when mixing-mastering.
I use UAD DSP plugins on the master... this is cause of many issue... the MAIN problem is that Logic is able to compensate Plugin Audio Latency (PDC)... but not Graphics .. (GPDC is not available... instead Logic 7... Logic 7 have GPDC!!! ... in Logic 8 graphical plugin delay compensation is a missing features)
the resulting behavior is that All meters show anticipate by the sound...
but this is not fixable.. or better.. Apple developers must included the Graphic delay compensation in order to get metering in sync with Audio... (I hope in the 8.1 version)
Anyway.. i love UAD sound and I use them in any case..
return back to your question, I use Low Latency mode when i need to record some missing details .. without get DSP latency!
It is a helpful features (not so basical but helpfull).
Logic Pro 7 is also a great DAW!
G

Xperia Z3 always awake sometimes, even with Stamina, Ultra Stamina, Low Battery modes

Hi to all,
Has anyone every noticed his/her Z3 always awake (and thus bad battery life), even from within Ultra Stamina mode with no running apps?
This happened to me twice now with just over two weeks of using this phone. I haven't been able to take specific steps to replicate this yet, but 2 days in about 16 days means so far over 12% of the days.
Usually, the phone lasts over 24 hours with moderate use. I normally have stamina mode "on", and set to activate at 50% battery level, and then Low Battery mode to activate at 20%. Note also that all the apps I am using have been installed from the first day I've been using the phone. That is, I have not installed any new apps before I noticed this happening, and when I have "normal" battery life it is using the same set of apps.
Here is an outline of what happens:
I notice a much faster than usual power drain, despite being a typical day of usage (i.e. nothing out of the ordinary).
I go to battery usage, and see the history details, and see that "Awake" has been on constantly, including during long screen off times, and all the while with Stamina mode enabled and active.
I then restart the phone. Problem still there, still constantly awake despite screen off and stamina.
Battery dips below 20% and Low Battery mode activates.
Phone keeps on being constantly "awake", despite no usage and now both low battery AND stamina modes on.
Restart the phone. Same problem.
I turn on Ultra Stamina mode. (I did this last time at 17%)
Phone continues to be always awake. Battery quickly drains down to 5% within less than an hour and almost no use, even though Ultra Stamina is supposed to stretch the life for an order of magnitude longer than that.
I shut off the phone to avoid complete discharge. When I return home, I plug it in and wait for a decent charge before turning the phone back on.
After full charge, I take the phone off the charger.
Phone now works normally again, without always being "awake".
I can't figure out what causes this sequence of events to kick off in the first place. I'm trying to play around with things to get it to start doing this, but so far I haven't been successful in deliberately replicating the problem.
Anyone else experience anything like this before?
My android version is 5.0.2, v. 23.1.A.0.726.

Perforn a clean update and report back in 3-5 days
PC Companion (PCC)
http://support.sonymobile.com/us/tools/pc-companion/
Bridge (for Mac)
http://support.sonymobile.com/global-en/tools/bridge-for-mac/
Alternatives on How to backup Xperias
http://talk.sonymobile.com/thread/36355
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." Kurt Cobain (1967-1994)

ISE low impact mode/Closed/Monitor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for