ISO consideration for calculation of MRP per Safetystock adds more demand

Hi Planning experts,
Internal Sales order consideration for aggregate demand which uses for Safetystock calculation based on MRP Planned percentage safety stock adds more demand in the warehouse.
We have ASCP Plan where X1 warehouse procures material from X2 Inventory organization through ISO created from Plan, after transfer Planned order releases from X2 and We have Safety stock calculated based on MRP percentage method in individual warehouses.
Since ISO considered for aggregated demand to safety stock, and acts as a individual demand for Plan adds of more demand to the plan and recommending additional Planned order supplies by ASCP engine.
Procurement rule: X2 --->X1through ISO recommended by Plan
Steps to Reproduce :
Goto ISCP Responsibility > Advanced Supply CHain Planner >Workbench > Open Plan > query PWB data for X1 warehouse for any item which is procuring from X2 org for ex:Item: Y1 , verify the safety stock for this item in X1 and verify the ISO created from X2 through early Planned order releases from Plan, so there is additional demand equals to ISO qty observed, where ISO qty not required to be considered for aggregated demand used for MRP Planned percentage safety stock calculation for item:Y1.
Need to exclude ISO qty for MRP Planned safety stock calculation, please let us know how to exclude ISO for safety stock calculation, so additional supply will not be recommended by ASCP.
Please let me know, if u have any idea how to crack this issue.
Regards,
Kumar
Edited by: user9093449 on Mar 2, 2010 3:14 PM

-->What is the shortcut to change location type in APO?
Report /SAPAPO/CHECK_LOCATION_TYPE can be used to change location type (say from 1001 to 1002 or vice-versa)
can you check if this works - cos i think you need to use/SAPAPO/CHANGE_LOCTYPE
--> Can SAP APO be used as a stand-alone solution?
*of course, as a stand-alone planning solution it can be !!
and the connected executed system, which need not be ECC, is to give a well rounded solution
there are organizations that have APO alone and integrate to other execution systems, and there are companies that have implemented APO first and R3 later. there are companies that just need planning and dont have to execute it (transport planning and demand planning)*
-->How to copy a Process Chain?
To copy a process chain to another process chain, goto the Process Chain you want to copy and then type copy in the tool tar
also... if you dropdown on the toolbad under process chain you have a copy option... but this looks cool

Similar Messages

How many primary keys for one table?can we add more primary keys

In general Table have one primary key.is it possible to more than one primary key in a table?(ie is it possible to add more than one pirmary key in a table). Help me out.

pls do check this link
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21ea0b446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21ea0b446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm]
All the key fields of a table must be stored together at the beginning of the table. A non-key field may not occur between two key fields.
A maximum of 16 key fields per table is permitted. The maximum length of the table key is 255.
If the key length is greater than 120, there are restrictions when transporting table entries. The key can only be specified up to a maximum of 120 places in a transport. If the key is larger than 120, table entries must be transported generically.

SO will not be taken into consideration for MRP until it is released for delivery.

Dear Sir,
We are following sales order basis planning (MTO basis planning strategy 50 is being used ).
When sales order are created by default it is blocked for delivery. In our present system, we have a scheduled total MRP procedure on daily basis. Hence, when sales are entered in the system it is taken into consideration for MRP RUN automatically.
But our new proposed system we want , until the sales order is blocked for delivery, it will not be considered for MRP RUN. It will only be taken into consideration for MRP RUN when sales order will be released for delivery.
Is it Possible ? If Yes, Please let me know the procedure.
Regards,
Amit Biswas

Hi Krishnendu ,
Then we are deviating from my requirement ,
My requirement >>
We are using MTO planning (Planning Strategy using 50),
1. Sales order are created for material requirement planning .
2. under MD04 list sales order will be shown under FERT material .
3. There is release procedure of Sales order.
4. Daily scheduled MRP RUN has been introduced on total planning.
5. MRP RUN only consider released sales order . If there is any sales order which is not released , that will not be consider for MRP RUN.
6. Under FERT material , there may be number of sales order both released and not released sales order.
Please let me know the process , sales order which are not released , this will not be under the scope of MRP RUN .
Regards,
Amit Biswas

PXI 2527 & PXI 4071 -Questions about EMF considerations for high accuracy measurements and EMF calibration schemes?

Hi!
I need to perform an in-depth analysis of the overall system accuracy for a proposed system. I'm well underway using the extensive documentation in the start-menu National Instruments\NI-DMM\ and ..\NI-Switch\ Documenation folders...
While typing the question, I think I partially answered myself while cross-referencing NI documents... However a couple of questions remain:
If I connect a DMM to a 2 by X arranged switch/mux, each DMM probe will see twice the listed internal "Differential thermal EMF" at a typical value of 2.5uV and a max value of less than 12uV (per relay). So the total effect on the DMM uncertainty caused by the switch EMF would be 2*2.5uV = 5uV? Or should these be added as RSS: = sqrt(2.5^2+2.5^2) since you can not know if the two relays have the same emf?
Is there anything that can be done to characterize or account for this EMF (software cal, etc?)?
For example, assuming the following:
* Instruments and standards are powered on for several hours to allow thermal stability inside of the rack and enclosures
* temperature in room outside of rack is constant
Is there a reliable way of measureing/zeroing the effect of system emf? Could this be done by applying a high quality, low emf short at the point where the DUT would normally be located, followed by a series of long-aperture voltage average measurements at the lowest DMM range, where the end result (say (+)8.9....uV) could be taken as a system calibration constant accurate to the spec's of the DMM?
What would the accuracy of the 4071 DMM be, can I calculate it as follows, using 8.9uV +-700.16nV using 90 days and 8.9uV +- 700.16nV + 150nV due to "Additional noise error" assuming integration time of 1 (aperture) for ease of reading the chart, and a multiplier of 15 for the 100mV range. (Is this equivalent to averaging a reading of 1 aperture 100 times?)
So, given the above assumptions, would it be correct to say that I could characterize the system EMF to within 8.5uV+- [700.16nV (DMM cal data) + 0.025ppm*15 (RMS noise, assuming aperture time of 100*100ms = 10s)] = +-[700.16nV+37.5nV] = +- 737.66nV? Or should the ppm accuracy uncertainties be RSS as such: 8.5uV +- sqrt[700.16nV^2 + 37.5nV^2] = 8.5uV +-701.16nV??
As evident by my above line of thought, I am not at all sure how to properly sum the uncertainties (I think you always do RSS for uncertainties from different sources?) and more importantly, how to read and use the graph/table in the NI 4071 Specifications.pdf on page 3. What exactly does it entail to have an integration time larger than 1? Should I adjust the aperture time or would it be more accurate to just leave aperture at default (100ms for current range) and just average multiple readings, say average 10 to get a 10x aperture equivalent?
The below text includes what was going to be the post until I think I answered myself. I left it in as it is relevant to the problem above and includes what I hope to be correct statements. If you are tired of reading now, just stop, if you are bored, feel free to comment on the below section as well.
The problem I have is one of fully understanding part of this documenation. In particular, since a relay consists of (at least) 2 dissimilar metal junctions (as mentioned in the NI Switch help\Fundamentals\General Switching Considerations\Thermal EMF and Offset Voltage section) and because of the thermo-couple effect (Seebeck voltage), it seems that there would be an offset voltage generated inside each of the relays at the point of the junction. It refeers the "Thermocouple Measurements" section (in the same help document) for further details, but this is where my confusion starts to creep up.
In equation (1) it gives the expression for determining E_EMF which for my application is what I care about, I think (see below for details on my application).
What confuses me is this: If my goal is to, as accurately as possible, determine the overall uncertainty in a system consisting of a DMM and a Switch module, do I use the "Differential thermal EMF" as found in the switch data-sheet, or do I need to try and estimate temperatures in the switch and use the equation?
*MY answer to my own question:
By carefully re-reading the example in the thermocouple section of the switch, I realized that they calculate 2 EMF's, one for the internal switch, calculated as 2.5uV (given in the spec sheet of the switch as the typical value) and one for the actual thermocouple. I say actual, because I think my initial confusion stems from the fact that the documenation talks about the relay/switch junctions as thermocouples in one section, and then talks about an external "probe" thermocouple in the next and I got them confused.
As such, if I can ensure low temperatures inside the switch at the location of the junctions (by adequate ventilation and powering down latching relays), I should be able to use 2.5uV as my EMF from the switch module, or to be conservative, <12uV max (from data sheet of 2527 again).
I guess now I have a hard time believeing the 2.5uV typical value listed.. They say the junctions in the relays are typically an iron-nickel alloy against a copper-alloy. Well, those combinations are not explicitly listed in the documenation table for Seebeck coefficients, but even a very small value, like 0.3uV/C adds up to 7.5uV at 25degC. I'm thinking maybe the table values in the NI documentation reffers to the Seebeck values at 25C?
Project Engineer
LabVIEW 2009
Run LabVIEW on WinXP and Vista system.
Used LabVIEW since May 2005
Certifications: CLD and CPI certified
Currently employed.

Seebeck EMV needs temperature gradients , in your relays you hopefully have low temperature gradients ... however in a switching contact you can have all kind diffusions and 'funny' effects, keeping them on same temperature is the best you can do.
Since you work with a multiplexer and with TCs, you need a good Cold junction ( for serious calibrations at 0°C ) and there is the good place for your short cut to measure the zero EMV. Another good test is loop the 'hot junction' back to the cold junction and observe the residual EMV. Touching (or heating/cooling) the TC loop gives another number for the uncertainty calculation: the inhomogeneous material of the TC itself..
A good source for TC knowledge:
Manual on the use of thermocouples in temperature measurement,
ASTM PCN: 28-012093-40,
ISBN 0-8031-1466-4
(Page1): 'Regardless
of how many facts are presented herein and regardless of the percentage
retained,
all will be for naught unless one simple important fact is
kept firmly in mind.
The thermocouple reports only what it "feels."
This may or may not the temperature of interest'
Message Edited by Henrik Volkers on 04-27-2009 09:36 AM
Greetings from Germany
Henrik
LV since v3.1
“ground” is a convenient fantasy
'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'

I followed the same procedure of reverse calculation from MRP pricing calcu

hi,
sap gurus,
i followed the same procedure of mrp calculation but
MRP Pricing Procedure:
Go through the following:
I will brief your requirement in short
MRP = 1012.5/-
VAT = (1012.5/1.125) = 900/-
so price before discount will be = 900/-
discount given at the rate of 10% = 100/-
Initial Price = 1000/-.
1. Create condition types as below:
ZR00 for price
Condition class = B
Calculation type = C
Plus/minus = A
ZSET for settlement (to knock off the effect of ZR00)
Condition class = A
Calculation type = C
Plus/minus = X
ZWST for tax
Condition class = A
Calculation type = H
Condition category = D
Plus/minus = X
Z007 for discount
Condition class = A
Calculation type = H
Plus/minus = A
ZDUM for net price
Condition class = A
Calculation type = A
Plus/minus = A
YWST for tax (to knock of the previous effect - to be used for posting to G/L)
Condition class = A
Calculation type = A
Plus/minus = X
YOO7 for discount (to knock of the previous effect - to be used for posting to G/L)
Condition class = A
Calculation type = A
Plus/minus = X
2. The following will be the pricing procedure configuration:
Step......No........Cond Type........... From.........to..........Man.........Req........Sta................Acc Key
10........0..............ZR00..................--..........--..........-...........-........---.................ZDU
20........0..............ZWST..................10............19...........----.............X............X...................
30........0.............text.......................10...........29...........---...........----.........X
40........0.............Z007.....................30...........39...........-----.............X............X
50........0..............text.....................30............49...........---...........-----.........X
60........0............ZSET.....................10...........19...........----............X............--.................ZDU
70........0............ZDUM....................50...........59...........----............X............---...............ERL
80........0............Y007.....................40...........49...........----.............X...........---...............ERS
90.......0..............YWST..................20...........29...........-----............X...........---................ZWS
ZDU - dummy account key for posting extra not required items.
ERL - account key for price
ERS - account key for discount
ZWS - account key for tax.
3. Condition records in VK11
Condition type----
Condition record.......
ZR00........................................1012.5.....................INR will be positive (1012.50 +)
ZSET.......................................100%...............................will be negative (100 -)
ZWST.......................................10%................................will be negative (10% -)
Z007.........................................12.5%.............................will be positive (12.50 +)
ZDUM.......................................100%..............................will be positive (100% +)
Y007.........................................100%.............................will be negative (100% -)
YWST.......................................100%.............................will be negative (100% -)
Condition records for Z007 & ZWST will be decided as per the conversion required. You will first have to manually calculate the amount for the condition type.
4. I create a sales order for single quantity for an item & the pricing will be as under:
ZR00 = 1012.5 (dummy account) - positive
ZSET = 1012.5- (dummy account) - negative will knock off effect of ZR00
ZWST = 112.5- (negative & no posting)
Z007 = 100 (positive & no posting)
ZDUM = 1012.5 (positive & posting)
Y007 = 100-(negative & posting)
YWST = 112.5 (positive & posting)
but its not throwing any condition records for ZWST and YWST
can any body help me
plz
regrds,
balaji.t

HI,
Plz try Routin for Vat formula.
i am worked on MRP pricing but in our case formula is different.
eg.: If i want to calculate VAT for B=1000 Rs. it is like
A=1000 * ((100/100 + (12.5- VAT 5)))
= 889
VAT (Value) = B - A = 1000-889 = 111 which is passed to GL account.
For that we developed one Routine with the help of ABAP and assign to Pricing Procedure.
Regards,
PM

Steps in Fore Cast Based MRP-reg

Hi,
we would like to implement forecast based MRP for spare parts which we supply against sales order from dealers
request you to provide us step by step working with forecast based MRP
1. what are the inputs for forecast based MRP
2. Process of forecast based MRP
3.Out put of forecast based MRP
4. reduction of requirements
etc...
madhu kiran.

Hi Madhu,
Use
Forecast-based planning is also based on material consumption. Like reorder point planning, forecast-based planning operates using historical values and forecast values and future requirements are determined via the integrated forecasting program. However, in contrast to reorder point planning, these values then form the basis of the planning run. The forecast values therefore have a direct effect in MRP as forecast requirements.
Features
The forecast, which calculates future requirements using historical data, is carried out at regular intervals. This offers the advantage that requirements, which are automatically determined, are continually adapted to suit current consumption needs. The forecast requirement is reduced by the material withdrawal so that the forecast requirement quantity that has already been produced is not included in the planning run again.
Reducing Forecast Requirements
*Reducing forecast requirements by consumption
If consumption is higher than the forecast requirements in the current month, then the system also reduces future forecast requirements.
*Reducing current forecast requirements by consumption
If consumption is higher than the forecast requirements in the current month, then the system does not reduce future forecast requirements.
*Average reduction of the forecast requirements
The reduction of the forecast requirements is based on average daily consumption. Actual consumption data is not relevant.
The system calculates the average daily requirement first using the formula forecast requirement/number of workdays in the forecast period.
The forecast requirements are then reduced by the quantity resulting from the following formula: number of workdays worked x average daily requirements.
Period Pattern and Forecast Periods
You can specify the period pattern for the forecast (daily, weekly, monthly or per accounting period) and the number of periods to be included in the forecast individually for each material. It is possible, however, that the forecast period pattern is not specific enough for planning purposes. In this case, you can define per material that the forecast requirements should be divided according to a finer period pattern for planning. You can also define how many forecast periods are to be taken into account during requirements planning. The splitting indicator is defined in Customizing for MRP per plant and per period unit and is assigned to the material in the material master.
For a monthly forecast, the requirements date would be set on the first workday of the month because, for planning, it is assumed that the total requirement must be available at the beginning of the period. You can then divide this monthly requirement into either daily or weekly requirements.
Prerequisites
You have set an MRP type for forecast-based planning in the material master (MRP 1 view).
You define MRP types in Customizing for MRP in the IMG activity Check MRP types.
Process Flow
1.The system copies the requirements quantities that it has forecast in the requirements planning run and calculates net requirements. During this calculation, every period is checked to make sure that the forecast requirements are covered either by available stock, by planned receipts from purchasing or by production. If a material shortage occurs, the system generates a procurement proposal.
2.The system calculates the quantity recorded in the procurement proposal according to the lot-sizing procedure that you specified in the material master. Depending on the lot-sizing procedure, several forecast requirements are grouped together into one lot.
3.For every procurement proposal, the system calculates the date on which it must be converted into a purchase order or a production order.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Vinodh

Pricing Procedure to be configured for calculating excise

Hello ,
I have new pricing procedure to be configured for calculating excise on base value , the procedure is as under
Base Price                              -
                   X Amount
Surface transport                    -
               Y Amount.
Crush Charges                        -
              Z Amount.
Base for Excise Duty               -
             X + Y + Z
Excise Duty 10 % on base value i.e X+Y +Z
Education cess 2%
Secess              1%
Net Inclusive of Excise Amount.
Clean Energy Charges -
A
Freight Charges            -
   B
Other charges               -
C
Net Total          -    ( Net charges inclusive of Excise Duty + A + B + C )
CST                 2% 0n Net total.
I need to configure the above pricing procedure with Taxcode with Excise and CST .Request for valuable suggestions.
Thanks
Guru.

Hi,
To configure pricing procedure we need to following Condition Technique
1. Create condition table -v/03
2. Access Sequence - v/07
3. Condtion Type v/06
4. Pricing procedurev/08 -
5. Determination of pricing procedure. ovkk
Now to create your new pricing procdure you need to create first conditon type to enter in pricing procedure
You can create new pricing procedure by copying existing one RVAA01 is the pricing procedure given by SAP & then do changes according to your requirement.
Step - enter no
counter-
Condition Type
FROM & TO - here put counter no to do calculations as per your requirement
to Make conditon manual /required/staticatl - click as per u r requirement
Print conditons
set other fields as per your requirement.
Hope this will help you.
You can also search threads for the same also for more infomation.
Thanks
Trupti

CPUSPEED - which instruction is used for calculation?

Hi,
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_stats.htm#sthref6785
>>
cpuspeed - average number of CPU cycles for each second, in millions, captured for the workload
>>
CPU cycle is described more in details at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_cycle
Question: Which instruction is used by Oracle kernel to arrive at this number?
I have a server with two 2.8 GHz Xeon quad core processors running 10.2.0.4.0 on Windows 2003 Server SP1. 10053 event trace shows the CPU to be capable of doing 466 million operations per second. Is it referring to one CPU only or both CPUs combined?
Excerpt from a 10053 event trace:
>>
SYSTEM STATISTICS INFORMATION
Using NOWORKLOAD Stats
CPUSPEED: 466 millions instruction/sec
IOTFRSPEED: 4096 bytes per millisecond (default is 4096)
IOSEEKTIM: 10 milliseconds (default is 10)
>>
How is this figure calculated?
Regards,

Question: Which instruction is used by Oracle kernel
to arrive at this number? It is NOT the CPU clock speed. That would be ridiculous when comparing architectures.
According to some sources, CPUSPEED and CPUSPEEDNW are 'representative of the CPU speed' by by running a piece of non-interruptible code written and controlled by Oracle. (Note:149560.1, Jonathan Lewis, Oracle Wait Interface: A Practical Guide to Performance Diagnostics & Tuning)
If you want to discuss this further, please continue the discussion in the Database forum, as the question does not reflect a documentation bug.

Mrp per unit filed in excise invoice not showing value

Hi,
in excise invoice print mrp per unit value not showing, to find solution what process i need to follow
please find attachment for screen shot.
regards,
sivakoti.

Hi all
i got solution from my issue , as above given MRP per unit value picking from MRP per case value,
here if MRP per unit value is more than 3 digits(ex: 1000 rs/-) then value not appearing in excise invoice ,for this my ABAP r has done program variant changes for numeric length increased for MRP per unit field
thank you to G Lakshmipathi and Ashok Kumar Telugu for spending your valuable time on this issue .

Exception aggregation for calculated key figure

Is it possible to have exception aggregation for calculated key figure in BW 3.5? As per Note 1151857, it is possible, however this note applies to BI 7.0.
As per note 152638, it is possible in older version only simple ckfs like 'CKF = Base key figure'.
Is there any workaround to define exception aggregation for complex CKFs in BW 3.5?
My requirement is like this -
CKF = (sales quantity - forecast) %share (sales quantity).
Aggregation for CKF over time should be sum whereas, for all other characteristics calculation of CKF should be done after aggregation(normal scenario).
So, defining exception aggregation of CKF as 'Summation' over time should fulfil my requirement.
I can not use calculate result as 'summation' setting for CKF because of following design of report.
Report contains structure(characteristic)
Elements of structure are -
Last 3 months(April - June)
Last 3 months - 1 (Mar - May)
Last 3 months - 2 (Feb - Apr)
and so on...
When data is aggregated for each element of structure, base KFs will be aggregated and calculations will be done on that.
Changes in the backend are also not possible because, normal aggregation of CKF-alike in backend will be summation for all characteristics.
Is there any way in BW 3.5 to model such a scenario?
Thanks and Regards,
Anup Kulkarni

Sum of individual values of CKFs is not same as the Calculation on 'sum of basic key figures(result of basic key figures)'. - Yes, you are right.
I need to aggregate CKF over time as SUM. However, calculation for result of all other characteristics should be based on results of basic key figures and not the 'Sum of individual values of CKF'. -
What i understood is that whenever the time char is in row, then result should be simple on the sum what ur getting but when other char are there then it should go for calculation based on the sum of key figure.
If im not wrong in getting ur point.
How can two differenct activites be perofrmed on same key figure depending on the characteristic .....!. For this u have to think some other possibility or let somebody else update the thread.

Multilingual Expression for Calculated fields

Hi all,
I need to write an expression for a multilingual Calculated field.(The calculation need to take the logon language into consideration). When looging onto the Console however and selecting languages the set languages are not auto selected as it does for Validations. The only fields available for selection is the Primary language fields.
Is their a way to create a multilingual Expression for Calculated fields and how can I go about it?
Thanking You
Chris Huggett

Hello Chris
That functionality is not supported in SAP MDM 7.1(5.5)
You cannot modify from validation filed values by language different than your connection language.
You can do it manually in Data Manager or during import.
As usually you can use MDM API for that activity.
Regards
Kanstantsin Chernichenka

MRP PER CBB AND MRP PER ATC

I WANT THE EXPANSION FOR CBB AND ATC IN CIN

Hi all
i got solution from my issue , as above given MRP per unit value picking from MRP per case value,
here if MRP per unit value is more than 3 digits(ex: 1000 rs/-) then value not appearing in excise invoice ,for this my ABAP r has done program variant changes for numeric length increased for MRP per unit field
thank you to G Lakshmipathi and Ashok Kumar Telugu for spending your valuable time on this issue .

How to use FORMULA in ABAP for calculation

hi all,
i have to do some calculation in my report and because of this reason i want to use formula. Could any body tell me the best way to use of formula for calculation purpose in ABAP or any other way?
Thansk,
abapfk
Moderator Message: You don't need to open a thread to know the answer for this basic question. A simple search or using ABAP Help will help in getting the answer.
Edited by: kishan P on Oct 4, 2010 11:20 AM

There is another option to do the same thing.
What can be done is, create running total. You can create running total from field explorer by right clicking and then new. Create Running Total Field dialog box appears. In that, provide the following:
i)     Field to summarize - provide the field to maximize (i.e. id)
ii)     Type of summary u2013 Maximum
iii)     Evaluate u2013 On change of field (provide the name)
iv)     Reset u2013 Never
Keep this Running total field on the details section and suppress if you do not want to show it in the details section. Place this field wherever you want in the report.
Hope this helps you. Let me know your comments.

Code for calculating variance between plan and actual in Co module

Hi Abbapers,
I have to develop a 2 fresh report : One for calculating the variance for the Plan/Actual in controlling and second for sales variance for the month Jan to Dec .
I need your help as I have to complete this reports in this week . Its Bit urgent.
Can you please help me with the sample code or any of the similar report which you might have created as I am bit new in ABAP. Please reply asap.
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards.

Hi Deepak,
For Finished Goods materials if you assigned Price control V (Moving Average) it is irrelevant to run the Standard Cost Estimation.
My earlier client we don't have variance because of the Moving Average Price for Finished Goods.
Please check, It is really required Variance?? If it is required check whether variance key is automatically assigned to Process order or not. (Control Tab)
Ravi Polampalli

Function module for calculating planned and actual cost of production order

Hi ,
Do we have any standard function module for calculating planned and actual cost for production order?
i need to implement this in a Z-report.
Thanks
Srini

Hi,
try below function module
CRMCO_GET_PLAN_ACTUAL_COSTS
CO_IH_GET_PLANNED_COSTS_TOTAL
Regards,
Sankaran

ISO consideration for calculation of MRP per Safetystock adds more demand

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for