Issue in ATG Production

Hi All,
While running ATG Production I am getting following Error.
**** Error Mon Feb 25 10:39:10 IST 2013 1361768950870 /atg/dynamo/service/Scheduler Error while handling scheduled job
null java.lang.NullPointerException
**** Error Mon Feb 25 10:39:10 IST 2013 1361768950870 /atg/dynamo/service/Scheduler at atg.repository.search.in
dexing.ConfigStatePersister.getTransactionManager(ConfigStatePersister.java:219)
**** Error Mon Feb 25 10:39:10 IST 2013 1361768950870 /atg/dynamo/service/Scheduler at atg.repository.search.in
dexing.ConfigStatePersister.releaseTimedOutConfigurations(ConfigStatePersister.java:1621)
**** Error Mon Feb 25 10:39:10 IST 2013 1361768950870 /atg/dynamo/service/Scheduler at atg.repository.search.in
dexing.IndexingPeriodicService.checkForExpiredConfigurationClaims(IndexingPeriodicService.java:297).
Please help me to solve this issue.

Hi,
I also get this error on Production frequently and this increased log file size to huge. Is there any permanent solution to this error? Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Issue with printing production order after changes through CO02

Hi,
Currently I have one issue with printing production order changes through CO02. If I go for print, all the operations are captured in printout. But after the print, if I add any new operations to this production order, and then go for print, its not capturing the newly added operations. Also, there is information popup coming "Copies will be printed for order. Original list already printed". This message effectively means, even after changes, when I go for print functionality, its just going for printing copies of original printed list.
Can anyone help me out to get the newly added operations reflected in the print through CO02 ?
Regards,
Shiva

Hi Shiva,
Refer SAP note 28887.
Source: http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=308577
Please search /google before posting queries.
Regards,
SuryaD.

Mass reversal of one component issued to many production orders

Hello SAP GURUS
One of the common component is issued to many production orders from wrong storage location ie instead of 0002 storage location it got issued from storage location0001,
Is there any way to mass reverse of this common component that got issued to multiple production orders
Thanks & Regards
Himakar Raigir

Dear Himakar,
In my understanding,There is no standard T Code to do this mass reversal.
But in MIGO/MB1A you can do 262 movement to the same storage location from which it was consumed for one single
production order if required or else you have to cancel all the documents using MBST.
Check and revert
Regards
S Mangalraj

Tables for Issuing Material to Production & Return from the Productin

Dear All,
I had a issue, to develop a report for WIP;
Here we are issuing the Material to Production nothing Net Work Ordeer, and received goods from the Net work Order. Here Client wants only the difference between the Issue to the Production & Received from the Production. Which tables Can i go for this report. Can any body had any idea.
Regards
Raj

Dear Raj,
Check in MB51 for the 261/262 movement order wise.tables MSEG,RESB,MKPF can help you.
Or else check in the table RESB,for the reservation no,here you can find the reserved quantity,the quantity issued etc along
with the cost.
Or else you can check in COOIS.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Planned issues against a Product Cost Collector

Hi, I am very new to Product costing and currently looking to find out the planned quantities that are there against the actual quantities that are issued through a Product Cost Collector for producing a Semi finished good maintained in Kg. Any help?
Thanks
Deepankar

Hi
The issue is solved.
The problem was on our end that some of the transports were missing. Ajay was right and those transports were missing.
Thanks Ajay.
Really appreciate it

CPU Issues with music production. LOGIC 8

CPU Issues with music production.
Hey guys. I bet this sort of question has been asked so many times, but i really have spent a long time searching google to get an answer. I have had no luck. I found many things on the subject, but nothing about this exact situation.
Okay, I have a Macbook 4.1 which has 2gb of ram, 2.1 GHz Intel core 2 duo processor, and a 111 gb HD with a rpm of 5400.
I have been having major CPU overloads whilst using Logic 8, And it is much worse when using Pro Tools 7.2 M-Powered.
Now, im not that knowledgeable with computer stuff, but I have a plan.
Im about to upgrade my ram to 4gb, and im getting a new hard drive that will be 320 gb and will be 7200 rpm and 16gb cache (whatever that means).
I believe that having a hard drive at 7200 rpm is pretty essential for music programs like these.
Now hopefully this will help me with the CPU, as i have found out I cant upgrade the processor as its soldered on.
Will this machine be able to handle Logic Pro 8 after the mod??
The real question i guess is: Is a "2.1 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo" processor enough to happily run logic 8?
P.S I will not be recording audio. I use the synths etc included.
Thanks in advance guys.

Alexander Farrar wrote:
Okay, I have a Macbook 4.1 which has 2gb of ram, 2.1 GHz Intel core 2 duo processor, and a 111 gb HD with a rpm of 5400.
111Gigs is a small disk
How much free space in your system disk?
when a disk contain files from over than 80% and only about 20% is free the speed of the hard drive goes down... some disk can loose more than 50% of fast addressing speed
Leopard require at least 50GB free space for run without problem!
for better performance up to 1/3 of the disk size should be required...
I have been having major CPU overloads whilst using Logic 8, And it is much worse when using Pro Tools 7.2 M-Powered.
you use Logic with a Digidesign Drivers?
try to disconnect the Digi device and use Internal Audio of your Mac...
maybe only that can solve your issue.
Im about to upgrade my ram to 4gb, and im getting a new hard drive that will be 320 gb and will be 7200 rpm and 16gb cache (whatever that means).
buying a 320GB at 7200?
I suggest you a 500GB at 5400 RPM
the 7200 Hard drive are not so good for stay inside Macbook chassis
the working temperature in a 7200 RPM disk should be cause slower speed than a more cool/fresh 5400 RPM
The temperature rise up if disk is full over than 1/3 of its capabilities...
(this rules are related with Disk performance but can be affected also CPU power in the real time processing because the system run on the same disk)
The hard drive temperature is strictly related with disk speed performance
and logic use a lot of streaming from to disc access for the EXS24 virtual memory and other Instruments and Synths...
*this can be the primary cause of CPU spikes*
I believe that having a hard drive at 7200 rpm is pretty essential for music programs like these.
I suggest a 500GB 5400 RPM!
G

Issue in ATG integration with Oracle Business Intelligence

Hello,
I am setting Oracel Business Intelligence up for Oracle ATG 10.1.
I am using CRS application to populate data to Data warehouse schema. I can see all components like generating log files, loading log file in to database are working file. I can see data in DW schema. I am using completely ATG's default implementation; I have not made any customization so far.
Here is environment details:
OS : Windows 7 (64 bit)
ATG : 10.1
JBoss : jboss-eap-5.1
JDK : 1.6.0_25-b06
Database: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
Oracle Business Intelligence : Oracle BI EE 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.5)
Used ofm_rcu_win_11.1.1.5.0 tool for creating OBI DB schema.
I am getting below exception if I access Report in OBI.
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 17001] Oracle Error code: 907, message: ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis at OCI call OCIStmtExecute. [nQSError: 17010] SQL statement preparation failed. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5, s_6, s_7, s_8, s_9, s_10, s_11, s_12, s_13, s_14, s_15, s_16, s_17, s_18, s_19, s_20, s_21, s_22, s_23, s_24, s_25, s_26, s_27, s_28, s_29, s_30, s_31, s_32, s_33, s_34, s_35, s_36, s_37, s_38, s_39, s_40, s_41, s_42, s_43 FROM ( SELECT 0 s_0, "ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" s_1, "ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders" s_2, "ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount" s_3, "ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size" s_4, "ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value" s_5, "ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue" s_6, "ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units" s_7, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_8, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_9, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_10, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_11, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_12, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_13, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_14, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_15, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_16, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_17, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_18, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_19, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_20, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_21, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_22, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_23, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_24, FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) s_25, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_26, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_27, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."# Orders (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_28, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_29, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_30, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Discount (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_31, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_32, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_33, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Size (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_34, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_35, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_36, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Avg Order Value (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_37, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_38, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_39, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Gross Revenue (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_40, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units (Prior Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_41, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units (Trailing 7 Day Pct Var)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_42, REPORT_AGGREGATE(FILTER("ATG"."Line Item Fact"."Units (Trailing 7 Days)" USING (("ATG"."Date"."Day Timestamp" IN (TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))))) BY ) s_43 FROM "ATG" WHERE (("Date"."Day Timestamp" BETWEEN TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1*60,date '2012-07-22') AND TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY,-1,date '2012-07-22'))) ) djm
Has anybody come across this issue?
Thanks,
Mukesh
Edited by: Mukesh on Jul 22, 2012 11:57 AM

Hello Andrew,
1.) DW schema in Oracle (‘Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production’).
2.) This is for every ATG's analysis. I have not authored anything custom.
I am sure connection information is correct in ATG.RPD file. I used to get different error like incorrect login or unable to connect if it was wrong and those are no more, So I
believe connection URL is correct. I am not sure if need disable/enable something or do some specific configuration in DB connection in ATG.RPD.
Thanks,
Mukesh
Edited by: Mukesh on Jul 23, 2012 3:50 PM

Preview issue in ATG-Endeca integration case of CRS at Endeca side

I'm using ATG 10.1.2 and Endeca with Experiece Manager 3.1.1, both are the most current version coming out at the begining of this new year 2013.
I followed the documents and deployed the Commerce Reference Store (Known as CRS) with option of Endeca integration. Now everything seemed to be ok, and at Endeca side, we could find deployed application of "CRS", and also we could find pages configured in Experience Manager.
But problems come unexpectly. I just configured the preview fuction for both ATG and Endeca. According to CIM, I believe I've configured them correctly, because I got the result that Preview function acts normal at ATG side with BCC. However, once I try to use preview function at Endeca side, firstly a new browser pops up to show the page of CRS, and then a message pops up said: "Error: Your site is not cofigured for Preview correctly. Please contact your administrator."
Why?
And what is the place of log file concerned with this issue could I refer to?

Solved!!
After indicated "ATGProduction" for ear file name to assemble, I entered the menu below:
[D] Deploy Production with a Server Lock Manager ATGProduction.ear to
Weblogic Online - Done
[R] Register Datasources on Weblogic Online - Done
[A] Add database driver to app server classpath - Done
[P] Post Deployment Actions on Weblogic Online - Done
[E] Edit runAssembler arguments
*[O] Configure Another Server Instance
> e
Choose e, means that to Edit runAssembler arguments, which I believe is the key point to access the layer setting for EndecaPreview.
Then the menu shows as below:
-------APPLICATION ASSEMBLY OPTIONS---------------------------------------------
enter [h]elp, [m]ain menu, [q]uit to exit
Choose Application Assembly Options: (* = Currently selected )
[1] -pack
[2] -standalone
[3] -overwrite
[4] -collapse-class-path
[5] -jardirs
[6] -verbose
[7] -classesonly
[8] -displayname
[9] -liveconfig
[10] -add-ear-file
[11] -context-roots-file
[12] -dynamo-env-properties
[13] -exclude-acc-resources
[14] -nofix
[15] -prependJars
[16] -run-in-place
[17] -layer
[18] -distributable
[D] Done
Select zero or more > 17
At here, we choose -layer to config, and do process as below:
-------APPLICATION ASSEMBLY OPTION VALUES---------------------------------------
enter [h]elp, [m]ain menu, [q]uit to exit
Enter values for -layer (separated by space) : > EndecaPreview
After all configuration above and ear file redeployed to middleware, I now can access Preview function at Endeca Side !!

Issue in ATG component broswer in Eclipse

I sucessfully installed the eclipse plugin. but there are two issues i encountered.
1) I created a new module named "DXH" in ATG root direcotry. after I create the properties file in the config diretory. I can not find the item in ATG componement broswer -- the folder is ok, but the component can not be found.
2) when I right click in ATG component broser and choose New Component. It told "invaild class name" even I input the sample class name "atg.nucleus.InitalService".
who can help me? many thanks in advance.

Hi,
I also get this error on Production frequently and this increased log file size to huge. Is there any permanent solution to this error? Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks

Regarding Goods Reversal and Goods Issue process for Production orders

Hi,
I have a issue regarding Goods Reversal and Goods Issue process for Production orders.
Actually I am having a Z - Function Module in that i am passing production order number other details to
make the Goods Reversal happen.
The code for the above is as below:
 i_mvtit-material = wa_mdfa-matnr.
 i_mvtit-plant = i_resb-werks.
 i_mvtit-spec_stock = 'Q'. "New
 i_mvtit-stge_loc = 'ZWIP'.
 i_mvtit-stge_type = i_resb-lgtyp. "New
 i_mvtit-batch = i_resb-charg. "New
 i_mvtit-orderid = i_resb-aufnr.
 i_mvtit-spec_stock = i_resb-sobkz.
 i_mvtit-entry_qnt = i_resb-enmng.
 i_mvtit-entry_uom = i_resb-erfme.
 i_mvtit-entry_uom_iso = i_resb-meins. "New
 i_mvtit-wbs_elem = v_frwbs.
 i_mvtit-move_type = '262'.
 i_mvtit-xstob = 'X'.
 i_mvtit-gr_rcpt = i_resb-aufnr. "New
 i_mvtit-reserv_no = i_resb-rsnum.
 i_mvtit-res_item = i_resb-rspos.
 APPEND i_mvtit.
* HEADER ELEMENTS
 k_gmvt_code-gm_code = '03'.
 k_gmvt_head-pstng_date = sy-datum.
 k_gmvt_head-doc_date = sy-datum.
* CREATE GOODS MOVEMENTS
 CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
 EXPORTING
 goodsmvt_header = k_gmvt_head
 goodsmvt_code = k_gmvt_code
 TABLES
 goodsmvt_item = i_mvtit
 return = i_return.
The Above code does the Goods Reversal but then i will update one Z Table with fields like
Production Order Number[AUFNR], Number of Reservation[RSNUM], Item Number of Reservation [RSPOS], Material Number [MATNR], Requirement Quantity [BDMNG], WBS element[PSPNR] etc. If Above BAPI runs sucessfully.
That is happening correctly.
But Then actual issue is i have do Goods Issue for those Z-Table records.
There i will give Production order Number's & Storage Location in Selection-Criteria.
Then i need to do Goods Issue for that order.
The code i had written as follows.
* POPULATE VALUES FOR BAPI CALL
 i_mvtit-material = i_zpsi7603_01-matnr.
 i_mvtit-plant = i_resb-werks.
 i_mvtit-spec_stock = 'Q'. "New
 i_mvtit-stge_loc = p_sloc.
 i_mvtit-stge_type = i_resb-lgtyp. "New
 i_mvtit-batch = i_resb-charg.
 i_mvtit-orderid = i_resb-aufnr.
 i_mvtit-spec_stock = i_resb-sobkz.
 i_mvtit-entry_qnt = i_resb-enmng.
 i_mvtit-entry_uom = i_resb-erfme.
 i_mvtit-entry_uom_iso = i_resb-meins. "New
 i_mvtit-wbs_elem = v_frwbs.
 i_mvtit-move_type = c_261.
 i_mvtit-mvt_ind = 'F'. "New
 i_mvtit-xstob = c_x.
 i_mvtit-gr_rcpt = i_resb-aufnr. "New
 i_mvtit-reserv_no = i_resb-rsnum.
 i_mvtit-res_item = i_resb-rspos.
 APPEND i_mvtit.
* HEADER ELEMENTS
 k_gmvt_code-gm_code = c_03.
 k_gmvt_head-pstng_date = sy-datum.
 k_gmvt_head-doc_date = sy-datum.
* CREATE GOODS MOVEMENTS
 CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
 EXPORTING
 goodsmvt_header = k_gmvt_head
 goodsmvt_code = k_gmvt_code
 TABLES
 goodsmvt_item = i_mvtit
 return = i_return.
 CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
 EXPORTING
 wait = c_x.
 READ TABLE i_return INDEX 1.
 IF i_return-type EQ c_s.
 DELETE FROM zpsi7603_01 WHERE aufnr = i_resb-aufnr AND
 rsnum = i_resb-rsnum AND
 rspos = i_resb-rspos.
 ENDIF.
If i run above code for Goods Issue it is giving error can anybody tell me what changes i need to do to make it work.
The Error Message i am getting is as below:
Qty and / or "delivery completed" ind. or final issue ind. are missing
Error Number for the above is : 264.
Can anybody solve my issue.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Rayeez.

Hi,
Thanks boss.
It is working now correctly.
The issue is the i_mvtit-XSTOB should be equal space in case of Goods issue while incase of Reversal it should be equal to X.
Thanks for ur efforts.
I had awarded you points.
Thanks a lot.
Thanks & Regards,
Rayeez.

SSO issue in the production server,com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (103)

com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (103) RFC_ERROR_LOGON_FAILURE: This system rejects all logons using SSO tickets
in the production server.....
while testing the jco maintained for Ess applications.
if i go for uidpw method for modeldata destination i am getting the error. in the Ess pages that administrtor not in this peroid(administrator with which id i maintained jco destination)
if i assign one employee to the admin in pa30......for every employee getting the same details of admin)
I guess this problem with modeldata ......i should maintain the usermanagement method for modeldata jco destination is logon ticket.
while maintainig that ping is successfull but getting the above error.
it is the problem with production server.......of E.P
in dev and quality everything is working fine.
plz help me out.
thankyou
swapna

Hi Swapna,
Please check the logon group properties for SAP system in t-code SMLG. If there is any issue with logon group then it might cause for this issue.
Refer to [Click here|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/user-interface-technology/wd%20java/7.0/portal%20integration/how%20to%20configure%20the%20jco%20destination%20settings.pdf] and [System Landscape Directory Process and JCo Configuration|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0c1d495-048e-2b10-babd-924a136f56b5?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true]
Hope it will helps
Regards, Arun Jaiswal

Goods Issue (MB1A) for production order - no stock reduce happening in WM

Hi,
I try to do a Goods Issue with transaction MB1A for a production order, but no stock reduces happens within WM (HUM).
I did the following.
Created a Production order - CO01
Created a TR - LB01 - (assigned production order to the TR)
Created a HU for the materials. (HU02)
Created a Transfer order to storage type 914 with L_TO_CREATE_MOVE_SU.
At the end I want to do an goods Issue with MB1A. This seems not to work correctly. When I fill out the ordernumber and process the transaction a Delivery is created.The materials are already on 914, so it can be issued directly.
What can I do to solve this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Alexander

Please find out is there any accoun t assignment is there for the component in question.
pl got production order disply screen and goto --> material list
check is there any value on the filed account assignment. If that is the case then you need to have special stcok for that account.
If it is empty then check
are you entereing the correct storage location and plant.
if that is also fine then check whether the component is already issued, i.e. goto the component detailed screen and check wthere final issue tick is there for the component...or the componentb is deleted...
come back after these checks.

Error while issue material against production order

Hi,
In our development server recently we have created on ecompnay code and plant by copying the one existing company code and plant, now for this new plant I have created new profit center with KE51 and after that I have create done cost ceneter in that this new profit center is assign now while goods movment with MB1A with movmen type 201, 202 it works OK system is not giving any error but while issue the material against production order in MB1A with movement type 261 system is giving error message
No postings can be made to profit center DUMMYBAOPC in company code MT50
Message no. KM183
Diagnosis
Profit center DUMMYBAOPC cannot receive postings in company code MT50.
this profit center DUMMYBAOPC we use in old compnay code and for this new company code is not activated for new we have new profit center then it is linking to that what can be the solution.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
After asigning new profit center in the Production order problem solve.
regards,
zafar

Subcontracting challan issue for end product with scrap.

Hi All,
I have one issue let me know how the system act in case of subcontracting challan process,
In our company we use one component and received two end product( one is final product and other one is scrap product)
My problem is how to treat this scrap in challan process.
Pl help me out.
Regards,
Zafina

Hi, Please use the exit to define how you want the system to consider Scrap in the subcontracting process.
Refer below exit for your problem,
1084323 USER-EXIT to update challan status if scrap is calculated
1103537 Correction to note 1084323 for ECC 6.0 Release
Please note the user exit will be accessed only if you were to write a code for it and you assigned/made 545 O as relevant to subcontracting
subcontracting scrap will work if the scrap percentage is defined for the component which is sent to the job worker. If you have a completely new material for scrap then this is not going to work as the system will never be able to assign the qty (mismatch of material code between the scrap material & the challan material).

Mass change final issue indicator in production order

Hi
Is there any report can show final issue indicator for all production order? How can I mass change the indicator?

Hi,
In reports such as COOIS and COHV you can select in the initial screen "List: Components" and check your "Change layouts" to view the report with the "Final Issue" indicator.
But you cannot do a mass change in this option. One way is : You can just select the particular order -> goto Component Overview of the order to be changed and do the necessary changes and save to get the required result.
-Thaila Shree

Issue in ATG Production

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for