Issue in Date rule creation

Hi,
We are implementing TASK ZT00 (Copy of standard transaction type 1003) in intercation center.
In the the standrdard date profile 000000000005, We have two date types ORDERPLANNED and ORDERACTUAL.
In the task transaction, planned START DATE and planned DUE DATE are calculated (default CURRENT date) based on the date rule 000000000002(Panned Date (Activities).
Now my requirement is calculate only planned START date (as default CURRENT date) and and not to calculate planned DUE date (as default CURRENT date) . What I need to do in the date rule to acheive this.
Regards
Iswari.

Hi Iswari,
Have you been able to solved this requirement?
I am facing with the same requirement, so If you have a solution I would really appreciate it if you share it.
Thanks,

Similar Messages

An issue with Data rules

Hi
Im using 3 data rules viz., Is_number, is_foreign_key and Is_not_null.
I have applied these rules to around 30 columns. When i deploy this mapping it is taking very long time to deploy as long as 48 hours. When i deploy the same mapping without the data rules its getting deployed in less than a minute.
I tried to see the generated code it is around 18k lines of code.
I donot know why it is taking such a long time to deploy. Im afraid what will happen if i test the mapping with data.
Please suggest me on how to improve the performance.
Regards
Vibhuti

Hi Venkat,
If u do selective deletion for the month of August the data will get flushed from the active table only so from the next delta load the data will get updated from the change log table.
First thing make sure what is the incorrrect data? And then create seperated infopackage and perfrom repair full request for the month of Aug only.Nothing to worry yours delta's wont get any affected.
Your data is getting loaded from PSA and then to the Data targets?
You know na how perform repair full request?
Assign points if it helps.
Urs,
BI

Issue Regarding Transfer Rules

Hi All,
We have an issue regarding Transfer Rules. We are loading Data using 0FI_GL_4 into ZFIGL_A01. It is a periodic load of data.
Last month due to some issue in R/3 we have to replicate the Data Sources and retransport the Transfer Rules from BW Dev to BW Production. Next we loaded data into the InfoCube. Now when we execute the report for the current period I am not getting Master Data Values. All are coming as Not Assigned.
We have tracked down the issue and found that the issue may be incorrect mapping of Tranfer Rules. Is there any way in Prd where we can revert back to old version of Transfer Rules or can find the old mappings in Transfer Rules.
Regards
Jay

Hi Jay,
The only way you can find your old transfer rules mapping is to goto RSA1 -
> Infosource -> Tools -> Program and compare the versions .
Bye
Dinesh

Using variables in data rules

Hi,
I have set-up a data transfer mechanism between serveral Essbase cubes that uses on the source cube a report script to generate a file and on the target cube imports this text file using a data rule file.
The current problem I'm encountering is that it does not seem to be possible to limit down the transfer to a single period. In the report script, there's no issue because that is recognizing the server variable easily.
But on the import side I have not found a method to have a single column dynamically writing into current period only. Is there no other option than someone going into this rules file and change the hardcoded fieldname each month?
Thanks for any input
Erik
Belgium

You can use substitution variables in version 9 of Essbase but not in earlier versions. Before v9 we'd get around this by using aliases e.g. CurrMonth. Each new month we'd move the alias to the next month.
"But on the import side I have not found a method to have a single column dynamically writing into current period only"
I'm assuming that you've created a text column here and filled it with a month value? It would be better to not have a month column and just set the month in the Header of the Data Load Settings.
Hope this helps.
Gee

Issue with Date Format

Hi All,
I m facing an issue with Date format in the prompt. I have used date presentation variables in my column formula as shown below:
FILTER("SKU Order Details"."Fulfilled Quantity" USING Time."Calendar Date" <= DATE '@{todate}{2900-01-01}')
The report returns data when I don't select any date range for start & end date prompts on the page. But when I select the start & end date values in the prompt, I m getting the following error:
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46047] Datetime value 10/22/2009 12:00:00 AM from 10/22/2009 12:00:00 AM does not match the specified format. (HY000)
I included the following formulas for start & end date prompts:
Start Date prompt: case when 1=2 then License."Ips Creation Date" else cast ('1.1.1900' as date) end
End Date prompt: case when 1=2 then License."Ips Creation Date" else cast ('1.1.2900' as date) end
Can you please help me resolve the issue.
Thanks,
Kartik

Hi Nico,
I tried putting the format that you mentioned, I m getting an error message.
My prompts have the following formula :
Start: case when 1=2 then License."Creation Date" else cast('1.1.1900' as DATE) end
End: case when 1=2 then Time."Calendar Date" else cast('1.1.2900' as DATE) end
My column formula has the following syntax:
FILTER("SKU Order Details"."Fulfilled Quantity" USING Time."Calendar Date" between DATE '@{start}{1900-01-01}' AND DATE '@{end}{2999-01-01}')
Error Message:
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46047] Datetime value 11/17/2009 from 11/17/2009 does not match the specified format. (HY000)
Can you please let me know if something needs to be changed.
Thanks,
Kartik

Automatic payment: OBBA Define Value date rules

hi experts,
Have you ever tried OBBA to define Value date rules? I met a problem with it.
In OBBA, my configuration is as follows:
House banK Account ID Transaction R C1 S Dev C2 A
CIT1 CNY 3 CN - 1 CN -
CN is the Factory Calendar China.
According to this configuration, I suppose the Value date will take Due date as reference date, minus one day, and if the Value date calculated is Weekend or Public holiday, it will use the last week day as the Value date.
But I made two tests:
In the first test, my OBBA configuration is exactly like above one I listed, in my payment proposal, the invoce Due date is 20-Jun, Value date is also 20-Jun, but I think according to the configuration, the Value date should be 20-Jun minus one day=19-Jun which is a weekend, so should be the last week day 18-Jun.
My first test tell me the Deviation from reference date in days and the Calendar does not work.
In my 2nd test, I changed the Reference date to 2 (Posting date), but in my payment run, the Posting date is 9-Jun, the invoice Due date is 20-Jun, the Value date is still 20-Jun.
My 2nd test tell me the Reference date for determining the value date does not work.
Have you met such problem, it seems the OBBA totally dose not work.
many thanks!
best regards
Sophie

Hi Sophie,
I guess it is too late for you already but maybe this helps to other people with similar issues. You also need to assign the transaction created in OBBA to a specific payment method:
But what is even more important is that you need to tick this box in the payment method company code settings - "payment per due date".
Regards,
Ondrej

Dynamically call function module in the date rule

Hi Experts
I am currently working on service request.I am facing a problem in the date management there.In my service request i have 5 statuses .One of my status is "Pending with consumer".I am using duration settings of service request.By duration settings , i am calculating the duration for which its pending with consumer.I am having 2 response profile one is 24*7 and other is having 9 working hours.In the service request from the SLA configuration i am calculating the escalation date & Time .I need to add the pending with consumer duration with the escalation date and time.I am facing a problem , i am explaining whole problem ..
Let say if the pending with consumer duration is 1440 minutes(that is 24 hours) .I am adding the minutes to the escalation date through the date rule.
I am facing problem that if the service profile is 24*7 then there is no problem but if it is having the 9 hours working service profile then after adding the minutes to it the escalation date is changing to 4 days ahead which is wrong.
I need to add only those minutes for which it is pending with consumer in working hours for the 9 hours service profile
I need to dynamically determine the working hours from the duration then add it to escalation dates when the status is changed from pending with consumer.
Please suggest a badi will work or how to do it.
Is there any way so that while adding duration's in the date rule i can determine if the service profile is 24*7 then i will directly add the durations or else if service profile is 9 hours then i will determine the working hours from the duration" pending with consumer" then i will add.
Is there any way so that i can call any custom function module then write my logic there
Its urgent as i need to give demo.I will appreciate a quick reply.Please reply
I will assign points as soon as i will get reply.

Hi sridhar,
the explanation already given is correct and good. Small add-on:
All functions called during one LUW with addition IN UPDATE TASK are stored together with their actual parameters in a temporary memory area. The moment a COMMIT WORK is issued, the functions are released to be executed by a so-called update task which is running in the background. This explains why functions called in update task never return anything, no SY-SUBRC and no export or table parameters If a function called in update task raises an exception or runs into an error the calling user will get an express message informing about this. Also, all database updates done by this update process are rolled back to keep consistency.
This proceeding helps to keep database tables consistent and allows the user to keep on doing his work before all database updates are complete. You may have seen messages like "material will be changed" after saving. If you open the same material immediately, you'll get a message "object locked by...<yourself>". This means the update task is still running.
Regards,
Clemens

Change contract date rule for contract items

Hi
I am trying to Change the Contract End date. This is getting updated. But there are some date rules which are not getting updated based on the contract end date.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Arpit

The issue is solved

Unable to Transport the Date rules in action condition

Hi Experts,
I am unable to Transport the date rules in the action condition in my actions to the Quality system from development system. the screenshot for development system- and the quality system are attached.
I tried to include the Action condition twice in the transportfrom Development but somehow the date rule is missing in the
action condition aftre transpor to the quality systemt.
The date rule has been transmitted sepaartely into the Quality system and is available there. Please help me in this
Thanks,
Rohit

hello
did you get to solve this problem? I'm having the same issue and havent been able to figure it out yet on how to solve it
thanks

Migration assistant and dates of creation

I have used migration assistant to transfer my files from a windows pc to a new mac book pro retina.
The transfer completed well, but the issue is that the original dates for creation, modification and last opening of my files are not the real ones, but instead of this, they corresponds to date and time of transfer. Because this is confusing a lot, does anyone knows who to fix it?

Are you sure its not shown? It should have a yellow or green icon, and list the name of the system and HD that was backed-up, not the one it's on.
If not, try to repair the backups, per #A5 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting.

Iw31 auto settlement rule creation

Hi
We have to create sett rules for Maint orders automatically based on additional data tab either wbs or cc.
The rules are created fine if the order is assigned to an object (ie Functional location with wbs or cc) with the maint order. But if the maint order is not assigned to a FL without a wbs or cc, the automatic settl. rule creation with default is not created.
I would like not to assign a wbs or cc to the FL since the maint orders will be generated from one FL but could be settled to sevral wbs/cc.

Hi ,
The requirement cannot be met through standard behaviour of the system , for your requirement you will have to go for the below mentioned user Exit .
Go to SMOD and give the name of the enhancement as IWO10027
In the components you will find the fucntion module - EXIT_SAPLCOI1_027 , which will serve the prupose that you are looking for .
Regards ,
Dewang .

Issues with ODATA service creation

Hi Gurus,
I am facing some issues with ODATA service creation. I have an analytic view which I want to consume via SAP UI5.
As per guides and blogs, I need to create 3 files, namely .xsaccess, .xsapp and .xsodata. I created these three files but at the same time .xsodata and .xsaccess got created at one more place. That place is my package which I checked out while creating the repository. Now when I try to activate my .xsaccess or .xsapp file, I get an error message - "The file name .xsaccess or .xsapp already exists and only 1 file is allowed per package"
for more info please revert.
Kindly help.
Best regards,
Chandan

Chandan Sinha wrote:
Can we add multiple analytic views in one ODATA service?
Certainly. You just have multiple entities then. You can even create associations between them. Here is an example that uses a combination of CDS Views, Attribute Views, and Analytic Views:
service namespace "Wile.services" {
"Wile.data.models::AN_EPISODES" as "Episodes"
keys ("EPISODE_ID")
navigates ("ToACMEItems" as "ACMEItems",
            "ToCoyoteNames" as "CoyoteNames",
            "ToRoadRunnerNames" as "RoadRunnerNames",
            "ToDirectors" as "Directors",
            "ToWriters" as "Writers");
"Wile.data.models::AT_ACME_ITEMS" as "ACMEItems"
keys ("EPISODE_ID","ITEM_ID");
"Wile.data.models::AT_ACME_CATALOG" as "ACMECatalog"
keys ("ITEM_ID")
create using "Wile.services:ACMECatalogExits.xsjslib::itemsCreate"
update using "Wile.services:ACMECatalogExits.xsjslib::itemsUpdate"
delete using "Wile.services:ACMECatalogExits.xsjslib::itemsDelete";
"Wile.data::WileECoyote.Episode.CoyoteNamesView" as "CoyoteNames"
with ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID","NAME")
keys ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID");
"Wile.data::WileECoyote.Episode.RoadRunnerNamesView" as "RoadRunnerNames"
with ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID","NAME")
keys ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID");
"Wile.data::WileECoyote.Episode.DirectorsView" as "Directors"
with ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID","NAME","URL")
keys ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID");
"Wile.data::WileECoyote.Episode.WritersView" as "Writers"
with ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID","NAME","URL")
keys ("EPISODE_ID","NAME_ID");
association "ToACMEItems" principal "Episodes"("EPISODE_ID")
   multiplicity "1"
   dependent "ACMEItems"("EPISODE_ID") multiplicity "*";
association "ToCoyoteNames" principal "Episodes"("EPISODE_ID")
   multiplicity "1"
   dependent "CoyoteNames"("EPISODE_ID") multiplicity "*";
association "ToRoadRunnerNames" principal "Episodes"("EPISODE_ID")
   multiplicity "1"
   dependent "RoadRunnerNames"("EPISODE_ID") multiplicity "*";
association "ToDirectors" principal "Episodes"("EPISODE_ID")
   multiplicity "1"
   dependent "Directors"("EPISODE_ID") multiplicity "*";
association "ToWriters" principal "Episodes"("EPISODE_ID")
   multiplicity "1"
   dependent "Writers"("EPISODE_ID") multiplicity "*";

FDMEE 11.1.2.3 data rule schedules not picking up the periods

Hi,
I am facing a strange issue in FDMEE 11.1.2.3 data rule schedules. When I create a schedule for the data load to use the POV periods, it works fine for the first month. After I change the default periods in FDMEE , data rule scheduler doesn't pick up the latest period. It still loads data to the previously set period. I have tried using the Periods in the data rule schedule to a new month, but this issue exists. Please advise.
Thanks
Kannan.

Are you scheduling the DLR from Data Load Rule page or have you created a batch definition with POV period checked and then schedule it?
Regards

Automatic Update of Dates in the Transaction based on the date rule assigne

Hi Friends,
This might sound very basic but, it is a major issue at the moment in our project
I have a date type Today-20 days
I have created a Date rule Today-20 days
and assigned to the Date type and then to the Date profile and the date profile to the Transaction type
when i create an Opportunity it takes the system date as Todays date and the Today-20 days is also calculated correctly.
Till now everything is fine.
But the next day when i open and see the opportunity the Todays date is still the system date from yesterday and also the Today-20 days is the same what i saw yesterday
Unless i explicitly click and change something in the dates, they dont refresh automatically
I need a mechanism to trigger the automatic update of dates in the Business Transactions
so as to trigger an action if an opportunity is open but not touched for 20 days
Any advise would be appreciated and rewared as points.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj

Hi Raj
As any other determination the date determination takes only place as long as no dates are filled. It is triggered then only after dates are changed.
Nevertheless your szenario sounds a bit strange to me: What is the sense of always having the actual date / actual date -20 days in the date scheme? As this can easily be calculated on request you do not put this into the date scheme; only information that stays over time is put in schemes (and saved along with the opportunity main data in the DB).
So if you want to stay with the concept the only thing you can do is to re-trigger the date determination of the opportunity by e.g. modifying the dates whenever you are changing / saving the opportunty. This can be done in the ORDER_SAVE badi or in an event (search the CRMC_EVENT_CALL table for an appropriate one). In both cases you need to code some lines of ABAP though.
Hope this helps,
Kai

Issue with date profile

Dear All,
I have one issue related to date profile which is like this,i have created a date profile and i have assigned this date profile to both Tansaction type & Item category of TA(standard order).
But the assigned date profile(date rules) is not seen in the header tab of TA transaction when i tried to create it.
please advice..
I need to resolve this asap.
Points will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance./.....
Cheers
Shashidhar
Edited by: shashidhar prahaladh on Mar 12, 2008 5:29 AM

Hi Sashi,
Just a suggestion,as you have assigned to both transaction types and item category, so may be after entering the item in the transaction, you might be able to see the dates at header.
Please read below which is source from SAP Help.
For every transaction at the header and/ or item level, you can define which date type you need for the transaction, that is, which item type you need. By doing this, you avoid saving unnecessary date types on the database. The same applies for durations (for example, contract run time).
To assign dates and durations to an item category, you group the desired date types and durations together in a date profile and assign this to a transaction type or an item type.
Link as http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/d4/fce93a29768802e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
If useful please reward points
Thanks
Srini

Issue in Date rule creation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for