Issue in PO Workflow

Hi Experts ,
I have a issue in PO release workflow .
When ever PO is created with release strategy , in SWEL   the below Object types and events are visible .
Object name    Event                                  date                         time             receiver
BUS2012            CHANGED                    05.01.2009                    19:44:14       SUBSCRIBE
BUS2012            RELEASESTEPCREATED     05.01.2009     20:25:38        WS9300080
This is the currect entry which was comming in SWEL and my workflow ( WS9300080 ) was running fine based on the event " RELEASE STEP CREATED " .
Now the below entry comes and workflow is not gettng triggered .
Object name    Event                                  date                         time             receiver
BUS2012            CHANGED                    09.02.2009                    19:44:14       SUBSCRIBE
The entry for event " RELEASE STEP CREATED" is missing now .
Can any body please tell me where i am doing the mistake so that the entry is missing in SWEL .
This is a issue in PRD client so hope to get some quick responce from you guys .
Regards
Sarmistha

Hi,
unless there's a new release strategy found and unless a release code is set, which is a prerequesite to another release code, there will be no further events for BUS2012.ReleaseStepCreated.
From another point of view:
For each release code that is open, there is exactly once an event .ReleaseStepCreated.
Depending on the customizing, changes to the object may reset all given release codes. The common understanding is a "within 2% value change" doesn't reset the release.
If you need to have your workflow triggered on changes, as well, you'd be off with linking it to the .Changed event. To keep compatibility with the standard's event, I won't recommend to create a .ReleaseStepCreated by another linkage (such as the .Changed-event).
Best wishes,
Florin

Similar Messages

Issue Transporting Business workflow from one System to Another

Hi All,
As there are many limitations in Import/Export of Workflow I'm going for a Transport of Workflow from one sytem to another.
There are some query's reagrding transporting of the Business Workflow through Transport Request.
1)   How can get the Transport Request no. of the Workflow to be transported? (As there are no direct versions displayed from menu).
2)   If there are any dependent objects first how to find the dependent objects lof workflow like if any data element, Domain, Table, Structure (if these objects are used in your WF definition or may be BOR method), Function module, function group BOR, Rule, WF template, task and Task assignment ?
3) How to get Transport Request no. of such dependent objects specifically The Task,Rule , WF template etc.?
4) I have object Type ZBUS2081 related to it how can i get its TR ?
Please describe as I'm new to workflow.
Please identify if there can be some issues after transporting workflow .
Regards,
Ujjwal

Hi Ujjwal,
Please find the below hint's.
1. Regarding the objects included in the Transport request check the Tables - E070*.
2. For dependent objects, you should check the workflow template. You have to check all the Task's and in the task go to
   utilities ---> Object directory entry --> Lock overview . Here you can see the request. It will show you the current request for    the Task.
3. To get the TR for Business object, Go to basic data ---> Transport data --> Here you can see the Request ID for the business object.
Thanks,
Viji.

Urgent: Issue in Automatic workflow Customizing.

hi,
Can someone please help me with this issue in Automatic workflow customizing ( SWU3)
When I try to execute the step
Maintain Runtime Environment > Schedule Background Jobs with missed deadlines
I get the error message saying
"Output Device "" not known"
Can someone help me how to resolve this? This is very urgent for me.
Regards,
Sam K

The guidelines tell you not use the word urgent in your message title, so please don't. Personally I try to not answer such questions until at least one day has passed, giving you some time to cool off and perhaps solve the problem on your own.
I can't recall seing this message myself, but my guess is that either your user or the user WF-BATCH (if the job is being scheduled with that user) has a default printer (output device) that is not defined in the system.

Issue in clearing workflow notification

Hi,
Oracle EBS:11.5.10.2
OS: AIX 5.3
after resolving the workflow issue i had a stopped queue of of around 5000 mails.
to purge that queue I followed the oracle Action plan.
1. Stop Workflow Agent Listeners and Mailers
2. Find the tablespace where indexes on corrid for queue tables are created :
select distinct tablespace_name
from dba_indexes,dba_queues
where index_name like 'WF%N1'
and table_name=queue_table
and name like 'WF%';
3.
update wf_notifications
set mail_status = 'SENT'
where status in ('OPEN', 'CANCELED')
and mail_status in ('MAIL', 'INVALID')
commit;
4. Rebuild mailer's queue :
sqlplus apps/APPSpw @$FND_TOP/patch/115/sql/wfntfqup APPS APPSpw APPLSYS
when i reuild the queue I am facing with the error:
error faced while running the script(rebuild mailers queue)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.67
Commit complete.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:03.93
Commit complete.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20000: Oracle Error = -942 - ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at line 281
Disconnected from Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.8.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.8.0 - Production
appldev@ebtstdb on /ebdevdbh/app/ebprdappl/fnd/11.5.0/patch/115/sql #
regards,

ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20000: Oracle Error = -942 - ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at line 281Please check line 281 of the script to find out what table/view (object) the script is complaining about.
Thanks,
Hussein

Condition step issue in a workflow

Hi Gurus,
I have a condition in my workflow which checks for an attribute value of he business object if its equal to 'X' based on which it takes two different paths for 'yes' or 'no'. I find it always takes the 'no' path irrespective of what is the value of the attribute whether 'X' or space. I have done this kind of steps many times in the past and never had an issue like this.
I check the attribute value gets populated well in the container.
Has anybody faced this ind of issue, great if some body can tell if I am missing on any thing. I am on ECC6.0
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Sasi

Hi,
say your attribute as 'flag'
and you are trying to check flag = X yes then do something,
for No do something else
check whether flag is populated correct and bindings are done correctly.
Kind Regards
Hari Sankar M

RFC issue in Triggering workflow

Hi,
I am trying to trigger a custom workflow from EP in Newly set up ECC 6.0 system.
Problem here is, Business object Event is getting triggered in R/3 with custom workflow as reciever, but the workflow is not going to the first stepThe event trace (SWEL) gives following information,
Action Receiver started correctly
RFC Status Logon not possible (error in license check)
I have checked the configuration in SWU3, all where fine, also the RFC WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 tested successfully. The ECC6.0 has the full license.
Please let me know why this has happened? How can it be solved? Please reply ASAP.
Thanks,
Shrinivas

Hi,
WF-BATCH has validity till 12/31/9999 and also the workflow initiator has SAP_ALL authorization,
Still the issue has not been solved. New thing i noticed this this problem happens intermittently !
For some time it is working fine, some other time its giving the same RFC error.
Thanks,
Shrinivas

Profile issue in export workflow when PS is editor but not within Ap

Aperture is with me on my MBP (with Elements as the external editor). My place of work is not graphics related, so it doesn't have Ap but does have PS CS8, which I've used happily for a long time, for their needs and I can use it for mine as well. So I can't use PS as the internal editor, which is OK, it's just the way it goes. I'm fine with exporting 16 bit TIFFs, using PS for all the things I can't do in Ap, and then creating 8 bit TIFFs for whoever I'm sending the images to, who will use them for the gamut of uses, both print and web, but I'm not in the loop after I hand them off. The images do not then go back into Aperture, they're archived separately.
What is the best way to workflow the color profiles in doing this? Images come RAW off a Pentax K10D and into Aperture for conversion and color and exposure, then into the pixel editor. I work in and save a set in 16 bit RGB and then hand off a set in 8 bit sRGB. Here's my problem: When I work within Aperture and Elements (internally), everything works as planned, and when I check the images but I send them they're correct in how they look and the profile as listed. But I'm not getting the same results when I export out to PS from Ap, do the same routine and check. Sometimes there is no assigned profile, and sometimes if I then assign sRGB the image goes from looking right to wrong, so I can't ignore the issue : ) No doubt it's from the external editor only being able to make one blanket profile assumption at a time, either working or exporting.
I understand that Aperture uses its own color space, wider than both. Am I correct in trying to stay RGB and then converting to sRGB? How do I achieve proper profile workflow when using Aperture and exporting to PS externally? Thanks very much for direction in this. Searches have gotten me info about what results I likely want, but not quite how to get them in this situation.

Arrg. Sorry for that typo. The sentence should have been " When I work within Aperture and Elements (internally), everything works as planned, and when I check the images they're correct in how they look and the profile as listed. "

Issue in Approval workflow

Hi,
Currently i'm using IDM 7.0 .
My Scenario: i have created a workflow task with approval requesting for a privilege. The privilege has been assigned an autoProvisioning task to the respective system.
As soon as the requestor submits the request, the privilege entry gets updated for the user in IS and the autoprovisioning task is trigerred and before approval the privilege is assigned to the user in the backend system.
But the case should be, if we have an approval task the provisioning should happen only after approval. but here as the privilege has auto provisioning task defined it provisions to the user though the request is with the approval with no action.
We have planned to implement IDM 7.1 in production. My question is:
1. Even in IDM 7.1 do we have the issue i.e before approval will the privilege will be provisioned to the user in the backend system.
2. If this is the case, please help me how to stop the privilege entry in IS and push it to a staging table when a user submits the request and after approval the entry will be moved to the IS from staging and so that the autoprovisioning task get trigerred.
Please throw some light on this.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Pricy

You have to store the requested assignment at another place which will be transfered by the approval task and which is just removed by an decline task.
One simple option is to work with an auxiliary attribute, e.g. called REQUESTED_PRIVILEGE, which is a reference attribute for privileges. Another option works with the entry type MX_PENDING_VALUE.
Kind regards
Frank Buchholz

Having some major mac - pc issues using remote workflow

Hi all. I'm having some major issues using the InCopy workflow and was hoping someone could help me out with a few items.
I've helped a client out with their workflow, proposing, demoing and promoting the InCopy workflow which seemed to be the best solution. And don't get me wrong when posting this message on the forum: I love the InCopy workflow and think it's briliant.
The scenario is that a design agency needs to deliver the layout for a big annual report for their client, who then makes changes in the text etc. The design agency is on a mac (ofcourse), but the endclient is on a PC. Now after some training and trying this all works fine. They are using the remote workflow, using icap and idap files (which they place on dropbox for easy transfer)
But they've been having so many issues these last few weeks, it's been crazy. And I'm actually starting to feel a bit uncomfortable every time they call me. Just to make clear, they love InCopy (... when it works). And eventhough I'm a huge supporter of the program I just wanted to make sure if there are any other glitches that I should know about. The thing is that (because I work for an IT company), every time they need support they get billed ofcourse. But the problem is that everytime they run into some kind of problem, production just stops and they need me to fix everything.
Issues that they are having:
- the endclient (so copywriter) works on a project all weekend (an icap file). Saves everything, checks in, closes, goes to bed. Next morning (monday) she opens up the same file to continue working and gets the "cannot recover..." error (see attachment). And she looses her edits. You need to understand that these copywriters really know what they're doing with InCopy.
- when a colleague of hers is working with InCopy, and InCopy crashes and she reopens her file then it also happens that the checked-out stories from before remain checked out and she cannot continue (because the story has already been checked out by "another user" (herself)). I managed to resolve this by opening up the individual icml files in incopy and just closing them again. That seemed to remove the "lock" status of the icmls. But still they need me for support. This also happened in the design agency. They are working on a layout, check out stories, InDesign crashes, reopen file and stories remain checkout and they cannot continue because InDesign thinks that they're checked out to another user. And they do not have InCopy themselves so I cannot use my "open icml in incopy and close"-workaround.
- after a few extra InCopy crashes (where InCopy.exe just doesn't feel like doing anything anymore and quits), I decided to place their files (unpacked icma and icmls from the icap) on the C drive instead of on their server and this seemed to resolve a bit of the trouble. The workflow seems to be a lot more stable now. I did this because they also received the dreaded "Error: code 0" message when starting up (and again) she lost her work). After some creative googling I was able to find out that this might have something to do with disk permissions and copy-paste issues on a PC server. Anyway, it was worth a try
- only yesterday the client called me stating she couldn't start up her icap files anymore. I was able to recover the indiviual icml files and send these back to the design agency and recover part of her work. (after combing out the files I discovered on of the icml files was damaged and could not be opened, that is why opening the icap file failed).
- and one last issue (which isn't really a problem but just a bit of a rant ;-). Why does it take 8 full minutes to open up a 2,6Mb icap file on a fast laptop (from the HD)? Even on my own laptop it takes several minutes? I know that the waiting time has something to do with the complexity of the files (images, how many styles, how many icmls, etc). But it seems ridiculously long.
They've been having issues like this on a weekly basis and they're starting to loose faith in the solution because it's costing them more money (via support) then it's saving them.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Is this because it's a mac-pc workflow? I understand that this is officially supported, but it practice teaches us that it's in fact not that stable I'd rather just recommend the client to get a mac from the start. Every client would rather hear that than having to deal with all these issues. And I have to say I'm very happy with the client for being so understanding, but I think they'll run out of patience soon if this keeps up. I've also included some other "postcards from InCopy" ;-) and so you must understand if you get all these errors during the last 3 weeks losing hours of work ... well it's just not fun anymore.
Thank you all very much, and hopefully see you guys at PepCon this year.
Bart

Hi Bob,
You are right, I didn't give this information. I must have forgotten.
Designers are working with:
OSX 10.7.2
InDesign CS5.5 (fully patched)
Copywriters are working with:
Windows 7
InCopy CS5.5 (also fully pathed).
There is no font managing software used, everyone uses open-type fonts which they specifically purchased for this workflow.
If the problem persists I will try with the assignment based workflow on dropbox. I waited with this workflow because the client wants to keep their files on their server so they can have backups if something goes wrong. I know Dropbox makes backup as well, but lets just say they have more faith in their own systeem (dropbox was completely new to them ).
So there are no reports of an unstable mac-pc InCopy workflow?
Thanks

BASIS ISSUES IN DEVLOPING WORKFLOWS

ARe the workflows including organisational structures are created in Devlopment server ike other Devlopments in ABAP and transported or they are created in Live server directly or in what way.
IF we create organisational structure in Devlopment server then while asignig positio u need to add user name. But the user names of LIVE server are not in devlopment server.
SO please guide in all these basis related issues.

hi,
check the sites you will get knowledge on workflow
Workflow is a tool for automating the business process so that the process itself flows smoothly, without bottlenecks and without dead ends. Critical parts of the process can be streamlined with deadline monitoring and contingency options. Participants are informed of milestones in the process. The process definition itself is powerful enough to allow business re-engineering with re-training and to eliminate the impact of workforce changes on the basic business process.
SAP Business Workflow is the R/3 tool for handling the process automation within R/3 or between R/3 systems and other systems involved in the business process. It is flexible enough to handle ad hoc processes such as the circulation of an electronic document. It is robust enough to handle mission critical process in the production system such as the creation of a material master.
The different R/3 applications supply standard workflows for the commonly occurring processes. Once these workflow templates are activated, they are ready for immediate use. A complete set of workflow tools, including the workflow editor and workflow generation wizard, are provided to enhance these standard workflows or create new workflows. These tools are complemented with transactions for monitoring, tracking and the statistical analysis of the processes.
Because the business process often does not step at the R/3 boundary, various interfaces and third party tools are available for extending the process across systems.
Workflow is the technique for automating business processes. It is particularly beneficial
when different people are involved in different parts of the process
when a process only occurs sporadically and the users need to be reminded of what they need to do
when the duration of the process is critical and deadlines have to be met
when the process definition is likely to change on the fly and retraining users is not possible.
By automating the process, you free the users from having to know what to do when. Work items are sent to the participants notifying them of what they have to do, and a single click on the notification calls the correct transaction and navigates to the relevant screen.
When the workflow runs it creates work items which are like e-mails, but
they have the advantage that they contain the intelligence needed to execute the relevant task with the correct data when the operational user executes them,
they provide their own functionality so that the operational user has access to everything that is useful to improve the flow of the process,
they disappear on their own when they have been executed by someone else or made obsolete.
These work items can be received in the R/3 business workplace, MS Outlook (or any other MAPI compatible client), Lotus Notes, or work item notifications can be distributed by e-mail.
SAP Business Workflow:
accelerates the workflow across applications, functional areas, organizational units, and time periods,
supplements the integrated management of processes in the SAP System with individually tailored options for automating and actively controlling business and communication processes,
combines integrated organizational management with flexible assignment of tasks and responsibilities to locations, positions, jobs, groups, or individuals,
actively supports a quick implementation of workflow technologies through predefined workflow templates, Workflow Wizards and flexible adjustment options,
integrates every employee in the value chain by providing a versatile integrated inbox ("universal inbox") at their work centers that can be configured individually,
provides a Workflow Information System that is the foundation for process change management and continuous business engineering,
was designed to be a change-management tool,
simplifies continuous business engineering and process change management with user-friendly tools for defining and dynamically changing workflow tasks
conforms to the workflow standards of the Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC)
interfaces to other mail clients such as Lotus Notes and MS Outlook
sites regrding work flow:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/fb/135962457311d189440000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/c5/e4a930453d11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Workflow
http://www.sap-img.com/workflow/sap-workflow.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/172437130e0d09e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
http://www.erpgenie.com/workflow/index.htm
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/wf/sap-business-workflow.htm
http://www.insightcp.com/res_23.htm
For examples on WorkFlow...check the below link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/3d/6a9b3c874da309e10000000a114027/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4a/dac507002f11d295340000e82dec10/frameset.htm
http://www.workflowing.com/id18.htm
http://www.e-workflow.org/
http://web.mit.edu/sapr3/dev/newdevstand.html
/people/mike.pokraka/blog/2005/07/17/sap-business-workflow-faq
http://www.sapgenie.com/workflow/index.htm
/people/ginger.gatling/blog/2005/12/01/link-workflow-business-objects-to-your-collaboration-tasks
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/92/bc26a6ec2b11d2b4b5006094b9ea0d/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/92/bc26a6ec2b11d2b4b5006094b9ea0d/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw31/helpdata/en/8d/25f94b454311d189430000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://www.sap-press.com/product.cfm?account=&product=H950
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSWFL/PSWFL.pdf
http://www.workflowing.com/id18.htm
http://www.e-workflow.org/
http://www.sap-img.com/workflow/sap-workflow.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/172437130e0d09e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/workflow/sap-workflow.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/a5/172437130e0d09e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm

File size issues with remote workflow

Hi everyone
I am currently reviewing InCopy as a tool for our two 24 page full colour quarterly publications and the problem I am currently facing is the design team are claiming the file sizes would be a problem for us to use the remote workflow - how do you guys manage large files over email? Any tips or advise?
Also, regarding the layout workflow, does it require a large effort from the design team to divide into individual spreads? As this is another issue.
We currently have a cumbersum process and would like to resolve asap.
Would greatly appreciate any advise you may be able to offer
Thanks in advance

If you are using a remote workflow ... designers are sending off-site editors InCopy Assignment packages (ICAPs) .... then they need to create assignments in order to package them for the remote InCopy user. So there's no need to split up a layout into smaller files or anything. An assignment is a subset of the INDD file; multiple assignments -- each encompassing different pages or sections -- are created from the same INDD file.
When the designer creates the assignment, have them turn off "Include original images in packages"; that should keep the file size down.
Or -- like Bob said -- you can avoid the whole remote workflow/assignment package rigamarole all together by just keeping the file in a project folder in the Dropbox folder on teh designer's local hard drive, and have them share the project folder with the editors. In that workflow, editors open the INDD file on their local computer and check out stories, just as though they were opening them from a networked file server.
I cover how the InCopy Dropbox workflow works in a tutorial video (within the Remote Workflows chapter) on Lynda.com here:
http://www.lynda.com/tutorial/62220
AM

Issue withe customer workflow

Hi,
I have an issue with the customer workflow. as the user have an authorisation on XD02 but when the user double clicks on the workitem XD02 transaciton is not opens up. but manually user can go into the transaction XD02.
Can anybody suggest me whats wrong with these

Hi,
when the user double clicks, wat appears, any message appears or is it removed from inbox, check the workflow log for the problem.
Regards,
JMB

Issue with a workflow step- BO used: BUS7051

Hi All,
We have a requirement where we are adding a step in a workflow as we want PCR(Process change request) form to get dispalyed to a user's inbox(SAP Business workplace, Workflow inbox) and then proceed with the usual flow of the workflow.
To dispaly the same we are using the method "display" of standard BO BUS7051.
When i am testing the workflow thro' R/3, the user gets the workitem in his SAP Business workplace Inbox, he is able to view the form properly and then its moving onto the next step.
But when i am testing the same thro' Portal, the workitem comes to the user's Workflow Inbox,form is getting displayed properly for the first time but again when the user opens the form he is getting the msg " workitem locked by user...enqueue error".
Can any one plz help me out in resolving the same.
Regards,
Richa Sinha

Hello,
Should not have any issues as method display calls Tcode IQS23 and hence lock entry issues should not arise.
Vish

Agent determination issue in a workflow

Greetings everyone!
I'm configuring some business scenario with the help of a business workflow in SAP CRM 7.0 I'm using activity step and want to determine agents using standard SAP rule 10000162 ("Employees for responsible org. unit"). I've tested the rule outside of the workflow and it's working fine, but in workflow it fails to determine an agent.
In a log I see following errors:
Agent determination for step '0000000023' failed;
Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task;
I've made some tests depending on what assignment task has:
1. When it is a general task, work item was created for a workflow initiator even though rule failed to determine an agent.
2. When it is a task with general forwarding with assigned position(s), which rule will never determine, work item was created for holder(s) of that position(s).
3. When it is a task with general forwarding with no assignments, workflow could not determine an agent as expected.
I've also debugged functional module for that rule and it determines appropriate agent but then do some check with the help of RH_TASK_AGENT_CHECK function and returns an error.
Can someone help me with this problem? Is it some standard expected behavior or not?
Maybe something wrong with the org. plan?
All answers are appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Alex.

Hello Rick and Eddie.
I've tried to assign user directly instead of position to a task with no help. I get the same result.
I've tried to set a task as a general task and made the rule to fail if there is no resolution and it fails.
I've tried to assign position or user directly to activity in a workflow and it does work but that's not what I need in my scenario.
As I said earlier I've tried to debug that rule invoked from a workflow. I will post some screenshots for you.
I set a task as a general task and assigned rule 10000162 (ABBR="PARTNER_1", Name="Employees for responsible org. unit") to activity step in a workflow and here is what I get:
1. Function CRM_ORGMAN_ORGOBJECTS_FIND_2 gets called by the rule and resp. sales org. unit is passed there ([screenshot1|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug1.png])
2. Next function CRM_ORGUNIT_GETEMPLOYEES gets called passing id of a resp. sales org.unit without a type.
3. Next RH_STRUC_GET gets called and returns result table with position and central person for that position ([screenshot2|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug2.png])
4. In the end of CRM_ORGMAN_ORGOBJECTS_FIND_2 function only central person in inserted to the actor_tab ([screenshot3|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug3.png])
5. After CRM_ORGMAN_ORGOBJECTS_FIND_2 ends we appear in a RH_GET_ACTORS function where we can see that agent check is performed if act_task is not initial. I assume that check is not performed if we do a simulation of a rule ([screenshot4|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug4.png])
6. Then RH_TASK_AGENT_CHECK function gets called for every record in a actor_tab. In out particular case it's one record. ([screenshot5|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug5.png])
7. Inside that function checks act_wi_id (activity work item id?) if it's initial and get exluded agents. It is initial in my case ([screenshot6|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug6.png])
8. Then function tries to read table with keys equal to type and id of found agent and errors there, perhaps because there is no record in that table ([screenshot7|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug7.png])
That error results in overall agent determination failure.
Hope this screenshots will help to identify a problem.
Why read table results in an error and because of that all rule fails?
Regards,
Alex.

Reg: Workitem forwarding issue in SC workflow

Hi,
     I have a problem in Shopping cart workflow.
When I try to forward the work item, the system is allowing me to forward it to only one person.
     I have two options. Please help me to achieve any of the two options.
Option1 : To forward it to list of users
Option2 : To forward it to an org.unit.
     For the first option, I dont have to facility to add two or more users.
     For the second option, I need to enable the search facility to search for org.units.
     Please help me to achieve any of this two options.
With Thanks and Regards
Ravishankar Vembu.

Hi,
Option1 : To forward it to list of users
To forward it to list of users. say for example 5 users.
in SU01d, the email should be common e mail
test at the rate of usa.com for all the 5 users
.So when you are forwarding the email to test at the rate of usa.com it will go to all the 5 users.
Please try it will work
G.Ganesh Kumar

Issue in PO Workflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for