Issue in XI to XI integration

Hi,
I am working on a requirmen, in which I am trying to connect two PI systems with each other, the scenario is like
ECC ==> SAP-PI 7.1 ==> SAP-PI 7.0 ==> Third Party.
I am using XI adapters for this, My scenario is working fine till 2nd PI. I am able to receive the messages in 2nd PI system, but in SXMB_MONI of 2nd PI, messages are getting failed with an error "No receiver aggrement found." One thing I noticed is, when the msg comes in 2nd PI system, it comes with the config. details of the 1st PI system. (Sender Interface, namespace, service, Receiver Interface, service etc.) This is why 2nd PI is not able to send msg to the receiver. Has anyone faced this problem before.
Any suggestions, documents will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Amit..

HI Amit,
In your scenario try to use Soap Adapter in between two PI's, i.e expose your proxy structure as webservice by creating WSDL in PI1 and import this WSDL in PI2.
Hence first PI will send out Soap Message( SOAP Receiver Adapter) pointing to PI2 and PI2 will receive it through Sender SOAP Adapter. then use File Adapter to send this message to Third Party.
Try this approach. I hope it will work.
Thanks & Regards,
Anurag Garg

Similar Messages

Tacacs+ access issue with ASA firewall after integrating with RSA SecureID

Hi,
In my earlier post, I raised the same question but let me rephrased it again. I have configured TACACS+ in cisco ASA firewall and able to access . But when I integrated it with RSA secure ID , I am not able to enter in enable mode. It is not accepting enable password nor RSA passcode. I have created enable_15 in ASA , ACS and RSA server but no luck.
Did any one face similar issue with ASA access ?
Rgds
Siddhesh

Hi Siddesh,
In order to help you here, I need to know few things:
1.] Show run | in aaa
2.] When you enter enable password on ASA CLI, what error do you see on ACS > Monitoring and reports > AAA protocols > tacacs authentication > "look for the error message"
3.] Turn on the debugs on ASA "debug tacacs" and "debug aaa authentication" before you duplicate the problem.
~BR
Jatin Katyal
**Do rate helpful posts**

Dimitri, Having issues with Anychart5 for APEX integration kit

Hello Dimitri,
I tried sending an email to [email protected]; however, I get an error so I hope to catch you here.
I have installed APEX trial integration kit into another folder and modified the region to point to the correct path. The new charts show; however, some of the labels are not displaying on the 3D pie chart. I've noticed this is an issue on the sample http://anychart.apex-evangelists.com/pls/apex/f?p=755:7:1610753316996317::NO:::. Also, the legend just says value1 with no data.
Regards,
Kelly

Tasty, Morten!
Good work.
Ben

Issue with Receiver MDM Adapter - Integrated Configuration

Hi Experts,
My scenario is I need to pick a file from PI Directory and push it into MDM Ready folder.
The source file structure is ~ delimiter text file and at the receiving end , I need to push the same file as it is.
At the receiving side I have used MDM Adapter.
The issue at receiving side is:
I am receiving file with .xml extension with the same content as of source file but my requirement is .txt file.
Please advise on this.
I am using SAP PI 7.31.
P.S.- I have not used FTP at the receiver side due to some other concerns.
Thanks,
Vivek Jain

Hi Amit,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes we had tested successfully via SOAP UI as well (forgot to mention that). We are getting back the expected response in SOAP UI without using any credentials. We got the same response when we tested it through OS commands from PI server.
The WS is hosted by the target system and they haven't maintained any credentials at their end. So when PI is trying to access, we don't need to provide any credentials. My question is, whether the target system should keep any credentials to send the synchronous response back to PI (java stack). We have tried that as well but since there aren't any logs, we are unable to verify whether the credentials are coming correctly.
The service interfaces are correct and PI configuration are OK. I will try the XPI inspector for logs as you have suggested.
Thanks
Justin

Issue with condition editor in integration process

Hi,
Now there is the chance to use this feature for the first time.
Seems to be very easy.... No, it isnt!
Variable RETURN (type string) referencing to a field of a message structure is used for this condition:
RETURN!="I001"
So, if the variable does not contain the string I001 the process should use the exception path.
Ok, easy! This works!
But now I have this case to solve with the condition editor.
If the variable does not contain the string I001 OR E002 the process should use the exception path.
So my condition looks like this now:
RETURN!="I001"|RETURN!="E001"
=> If return is NOT I001 OR Return is NOT E001....
Result: semantical check is OK but the process always chooses the exception path now.
Oh, why this?
An alternative RETURN!=("I001"|"E001") does not pass the semantic check.
So I am missing ideas now how to write down the condition for my switch step
as this issue seems to be not discussed in any thread here.
Any help with this strange feature is really appreciated!
Best regards
Dirk

Hi Dirk,
=> If return is NOT I001 OR Return is NOT E001....
for me, your logic is wrong, what you need for your exception receiver is :
=> If return is NOT I001 AND Return is NOT E001....
NON (a OR b) <=> (NON a) AND (NON b).
so for your receiver_ok, you have to use the opposite: so the solution providen by Ramesh, and so to ahve two receiver lines like that:
(Result = "l001" OR Result ="E0011" ) ==> Receiver_ok
<blank_condition (*)> ==> Receiver_Exception
(*) all condition which does not respect the 1st ones: Result = "l001" OR Result ="E0011".
regards.
Mickael

Authorization Issue to Upload file in Integrated Planning

Hi All
I have included the planning role for the user...which is the same as mine..I can execute and upload the file..when I login with the user iD, it says you are not authorize to upload zFILE_SEQ/...in my role..there is Z* values also..
No idea how to rectify as I dont see any problem??
pppls help..

Hi,
Could you please look into the authorizations that restrict data selection for the user, say if he control one or two costcenters and you have access to all costcenters. Also you need to have that object in the Aggregation level that allow the user selection. You need to include that info object restriction based on authorization value in the aggregation level and in the upload file.
Also try to execute the input ready query from RSECADMIN T-CODE . Use the 3rd tab and choose the user id and choose with log .Then on the next screen will be RSRT and choose your input ready query and execute. Then choose back button and the pervious screen choose display log, which will give you detail log on the authorization issue ...
hope it helps...
cheers,
Balaji
Edited by: Balaji NS on Jun 4, 2011 1:47 AM

Issue in BI 7.0 integration with SRM 5.0

Hi All,
We are trying to integrate SRM 5.0 with BI 7.0. I have activated all the business content reports and was trying to check the validity in Business Analyzer. When i hit <b>check</b> i get the following error in Query Designer:
<b>System Error in program SAPLRRI2 and form CUDIM_FUELLEN_QUELL-01-</b>
I tried looking up in Notes but could not find any related matching. Can someone help me out on this ASAP...
Thankyou

Hi,
Try to Translate to English apply below the Note:
      Hinweis 989064 - X299 Brain im SAPLRRI2; Form CUDIM_FUELLEN_QUELL-01-
Hinweissprache:   Deutsch Version:   1 Gültigkeit:   gültig seit 12.10.2006
Zusammenfassung
Symptom
Beim Prüfen oder Generieren einer Query kommt es zum Abbruch X299(BRAIN) Systemfehler: Program SAPLRR2; FORM CUDIM_FUELLEN_QUELL-01-
Weitere Begriffe
Query Währungsumrechnung
Ursache und Voraussetzungen
Die Query benutzt eine Währungsumrechnungsart (CTTNM) in der eine Zielwährung eingetragen ist, die nicht existiert.
Lösung
Mit der Korrektur wird die X-Message durch die gezielte Abbruchmeldung Brain A 288 ersetzt.
BW 3.0B / BW 3.10 Content
           Bitte verwenden Sie die angegebene Korrekturanleitung. Für die SAP BW Releases 3.0B und 3.10 werden bis auf weiters keine Support Packages mehr ausgeliefert.
BW 3.50
           SpielenSie das Support Package 20 für 3.5 (BW3.50-Patch20 bzw. SAPKW35020) in Ihr BW-System ein. Das Support Package ist verfügbar, wenn der Hinweis 0986891 mit dem Kurztext "SAPBWNews BW SP20 NetWeaver'04 Stack 20" für Kunden freigegeben ist, der dieses Support Package näher beschreibt.
BW 7.0
           SpielenSie das Support Package 11 für 7.0 (BW7.0-Patch11 bzw. SAPKW70011) in Ihr BW-System ein. Das Support Package ist verfügbar, wenn der Hinweis 0914305 mit dem Kurztext "SAPBWNews BW 7.0 SP11" für Kunden freigegeben ist, der diesen Support Package näher beschreibt.
In dringenden Fällen kann die Korrekturanleitung verwendet werden.
Vorher sollten unbedingt die Hinweise 932065, 935140, 948389, 964580 und 969846 zur Transaktion SNOTE eingebaut sein, da es sonst beim Ausbauen einiger Hinweise zu Problemen und Syntax-Fehlern kommen kann.
Die genannten Hinweise können bereits vor der Freigabe des Support Packages verfügbar sein, um vorab Informationen zur Verfügung zu stellen. In diesem Fall enthält der Kurztext allerdings noch das Wort "Vorabversion".
Kopfdaten
Freigabestatus: Für Kunden freigegeben
FREIGEGEBEN AM: 12.10.2006 10:12:19
PRIORITÄT: Korrektur mit geringer Priorität
KATEGORIE: Programmfehler
HAUPTKOMPONENTE: BW-BEX-OT-OLAP-HIER Hierarchiebenutzung
ZUSÄTZLICHE KOMPONENTEN: BW-BEX-OT OLAP-Technologie
Releases
Software
komponente Release Von
Release bis
Release Und
folgende
SAP_BW 30 30B 30B
SAP_BW 310 310 310
SAP_BW 35 350 350
SAP_BW 70 700 700
SAP_BW_VIRTUAL_COMP 30 350 30B 30B
SAP_BW_VIRTUAL_COMP 70 710 700 700
Support Packages
Support
Packages Release Package
Name
SAP_BW 700 SAPKW70011
Verwandte Hinweise
986891 - Vorabversion SAPBWNews BW SP20 NW'04 Stack 20 RIN
971631 - Info: Vorlagehinweise und SAPBINEWS
914305 - Vorabversion SAPBINews NW2004s BI SP11
Korrekturanleitungen
Korrektur
anleitung Gültig
von Gültig
bis Software
komponente Ref.
Korrektur Letzte
Änderung
506431 700 700 SAP_BW BR9K040462 12.10.2006 09:58:40
506432 30B 30B SAP_BW_VIRTUAL_COMP J19K026501 12.10.2006 10:10:42
Attribute
Attribut Wert
weitere Komponenten 0000030973
DownPort/UpPort-WF 10
hope this help you,
Krishna

Issue in WLP and UCM integration using VCR adapter

Hi All,
I am working on a priority customer POC .
I was trying to integrate WLP with UCM and done all the installation and configuration according to VCR adapter guide.
The version of WLP is 10GR3 and UCM is 10GR3.
I am getting the following error in connecting the the UCM repository:
An exception has been thrown while attempting to persist changes for the service: Repository Configuration.
Error authenticating to repository: UCM Repository. Possible cause could include, but is not limited to a bad repository configuration or the repository is unknown.
I have done the repository configuration from Portal Admin console not from the Workshop.
Please look into this.
Thanks and Regards
Rahul

<Aug 27, 2009 11:47:56 PM CDT> <Error> <ContentManagement> <BEA-000000> <Unable
to connect to repository UCM Repository
com.bea.content.RepositoryRuntimeException
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.ObjectClassOps.<init>(ObjectClassOps.java:
46)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.TicketImpl.initInterfaces(TicketImpl.java:
43)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.TicketImpl.<init>(TicketImpl.java:145)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.RepositoryImpl.connect(RepositoryImpl.java
:56)
at com.bea.content.federated.internal.delegate.RepositoryManagerDelegate
.connectToRepository(RepositoryManagerDelegate.java:914)
Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
com.bea.content.NoSuchObjectClassException
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.factory.ObjectClassFactory.buildObjectClas
s(ObjectClassFactory.java:289)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.factory.ObjectClassFactory.buildAllObjectC
lasses(ObjectClassFactory.java:207)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.factory.ObjectClassFactory.getAllObjectCla
sses(ObjectClassFactory.java:84)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.factory.ObjectClassFactory.<init>(ObjectCl
assFactory.java:54)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.factory.ObjectClassFactory.getInstance(Obj
ectClassFactory.java:71)
Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.ServiceException: Could not load information about
VCR content type. Unable to retrieve information for 'ELDEF_LIST_LINKS_PLAINTEX
T'. Unable to find latest released revision of 'ELDEF_LIST_LINKS_PLAINTEXT'.
at oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.ServiceResponse.getResponseAsBinder(Ser
viceResponse.java:116)
at oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.ServiceResponse.getResponseAsBinder(Ser
viceResponse.java:92)
at com.oracle.content.spi.ucm.UCMBridge.executeRequest(UCMBridge.java:37

Issue with Office 365 integration module

I have an issue with the Office 365 integration module on one of my customer's Windows Server 2012 Essentials servers.
Recently they switched to a new Office 365 plan, but the integration module still thinks the customer is on the old plan. This doesn't seem to affect functionality at all, so I think it's just cosmetic. On the Office 365 tab of the Windows Server Essentials
dashboard, under Subscription it lists the old plan and says the subscription has expired. Under Licenses it says "your subscription includes 0 licenses" and "0 licenses are assigned to user accounts."
Steps I've tried to resolve this issue:
Created a new Office 365 test user account (after switching plans) and then on the Windows Server 2012 Essentials dashboard clicked 'Change the Office 365 administrator account.' This made no difference.
Uninstalled and then reinstalled the Office 365 integration module. Again, this made no difference.
I suspected there might be an issue in the Office 365 back-end, where the customer's Office 365 account was somehow still associated with the old plan, but they said that wasn't the case.
I opened a service request with Office 365 support about the issue with the server dashboard, but this was their response: "As we are online service support team, we provide limited support on local application extension...you may need to contact the
Windows Server support team for further help."
As it seems to be just a cosmetic issue, I'm not going to open a paid service request with the Windows Server support team, but I'm interested to know if anyone on the forum has struck this issue before or has any suggestions.

Not seen this issue myself, you may be right in that it Is just a cosmetic issue, and I would be surprised if a fix was forthcoming even if you opened a case (or we opened a case for you) due to resources having shifted to the Windows 10.
You could grab the OIM logs from programdata\windowsserver\logs and we can see if there is anything obvious in there.
Robert Pearman SBS MVP
itauthority.co.uk |
Title(Required)
Facebook |
Twitter |
Linked in |
Google+

FI-SD integration issue Error in account determination: table T030K key NECA EXD Message no. FF709

Dear expert.
Thank you for adding me at your professinal network Linkedin. I am getting some issue related to FI-SD integration.
IT's coming while releasing billing document in Tcode VF02.
Error in account determination: table T030K key XXXX EXD
Message no. FF709
I look into Tcode VKOA- Acct determination for Cust Grp Mat Grp for sales organization for EXD, OB40 - EXD AcctKey, V/08- checked procedure Zneac.
And also maintained the taxcode in Vk11.
But i am not able to understand the issue.
Please reply with valuable suggestion.
Thanks in advance.
Regards Mani.
manibhushanchoubey8 at the rate gmail dot com

Hi
Please check below links
Error in account determination:T030K
Msg no.FF709 Error in account determination: table T030K key INT VS1 I0
Note: Please search in the forum before posting the issue
Thanks
Dasaradha

Is collection detection for caldav in the works for the lightning extension? Issue with lightning integration with multiple collections.

Hello, i currently have a server running davical which serves my users' calendars, currently users which wish to use thunderbird and do not want to use the web interface for calendaring (and wish to use lightning instead) have to add each collection seperately, rather than just provide the base URL of their calendar info.
So instead on most calendar clients putting this as the calendar address:
davical_base_url/caldav.php/username/
and be done with it, they have to go through the new calendar wizard for each calendar/todo collection, and cannot easily create collections from within the lightning user interface, instead have to resort to either the calendar interface or the davical server interface to create/manage collections. They also have to figure out what the names of the collections are under davical, automatically generated collections have a large UID name instead of the example collection names. I.e. they have to add a bunch of URL's like this individually as calendars:
davical_base_url/caldav.php/username/work/
davical_base_url/caldav.php/username/personal/
davical_base_url/caldav.php/username/worktodo/
davical_base_url/caldav.php/username/personaltodo/
davical_base_url/caldav.php/username/8302E5D8-3630-419E-BCFC-A6A144D292C8/
Are there any workarounds for this or is it in the works? other calendaring applications in the ecosystem haven't had an issue, Android is fine, iOS is fine, CalDavZAP is fine.
Hopefully someone can help,
Cheers.

Hi all,
Just curious if anyone was able to solve this.
We experienced the same issue in both NW2004 (SP 20) and NW2004s (SP11).
Through trial and error, I disabled the portal integration flag, and the InputHelpV2 started working perfectly. Decided to search SDN this morning to see if anyone else had run across this, and this post was right on the same issue.
When the portal integration flag is enabled, and you perform the F4 dropdown...your browser seems to hang, and no popup window is displayed until you click in the browser window with your mouse. Once you click in the window, a tiny small InputHelpV2 window pops up, but it isn't functional (i.e. you can't highlight a row, and click on the check mark without getting an IE error (Access is denied)).
Best Regards,
Chris Cassidy

Lync 2013 Outlook Integration Issues

I have a client that is having Exchange Outlook Integration issues when trying to set up Lync 2013.
The email address is [email protected] The sip address is
[email protected] But the Lync server is lync.domain.local. Client is on Exchange 2010.
The address book is not downloading and the outlook integration issue error icon appears on the bottom right.
If the client is set manually to [email protected] the address book downloads.
But can Lync work in the long run set up like this?

Hi,
Did you solve the issue with the help of Andrew provided?
Which sip domain name did you use for default SIP domain ([email protected] or
[email protected])?
Did the issue happen internal or external?
For the issue of cannot download address book, please check the External Base URL on Lync topology with the help of the link below:
http://ucken.blogspot.in/2011/07/configuring-lync-for-external-access.html
For the issue of Lync and Exchange integration you can refer to the link below:
http://blog.schertz.name/2010/11/lync-and-exchange-im-integration/
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there.
Please make sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Facing Issue while Integration Cybersource with ATG

Hi All,
I am facing issue with address verification while integrating cybersource with ATG.
Rest all integration with cybersource are working fine.
If i used VerifyOrderAddresses and mention addressVerificationProcessor to use CyberSourceAddressVerify , i get the below error related to houseno . box not found
addressVerificationProcessor=/atg/commerce/payment/CyberSourceAddressVerify
Can someone please help me on this.
Need it urgently. Pls let me know if need further details
TIA,
Mayank
Error Log :
12:03:01,992 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG There are 0 gift certificates to be collected
12:03:01,993 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG adding CreditCard to the Order
12:03:02,075 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG no form errors - staying on same page.
12:03:04,942 INFO [CyberSourceAddressVerify] DEBUG ----- request -----
12:03:04,946 INFO [STDOUT] ship_to_state=CA
bill_state=CA
ship_to_city=San Jose
bill_city=San Jose
bill_country=us
bill_zip=95131
ship_to_country=us
ignore_avs=
merchant_id=mykkaushik
bill_address2=
ics_applications=ics_dav
ship_to_zip=95131
bill_address1=1, Main St
ship_to_address2=
client_lib_version=Sun Microsystems Inc./1.6.0_31/Windows 7/6.1/-/Java/5.0.3
ship_to_address1=1, Main ST
merchant_ref_number=pg460011
12:03:06,320 INFO [CyberSourceAddressVerify] DEBUG ----- response -----
12:03:06,320 INFO [STDOUT] dav_rcode=0
ics_rcode=0
ics_rmsg=House/Box number not found on street.
request_id=3539115850040180464524
dav_us_info=S00000
dav_us_error_info=E421
request_token=AhijLwSRf7YylSTvL7cYIJ+1EEDyqAJGlwtJMsXXwMhEAAAA/QNM
dav_rflag=DINVALIDADDRESS
ics_rflag=DINVALIDADDRESS
merchant_ref_number=pg460011
dav_rmsg=House/Box number not found on street.
12:03:06,364 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG PipelineError: key=InvalidAddress; error={pg460011=House
12:03:06,367 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG adding form exception: InvalidAddress: House/Box number
12:03:06,367 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG root cause of exception: null
12:03:06,368 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG Transaction Marked as Rollback - redirecting to: billing
12:03:06,369 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG afterSet sees currentTransaction as TransactionImple < a
nStatus.ABORT_ONLY >
12:03:06,369 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG afterSet committing transaction TransactionImple < ac, B
tus.ABORT_ONLY >
12:03:06,494 INFO [ShoppingCartModifier] DEBUG Released local write lock using id 270000

It's an issue with the input which you given to the field:House/Box
Returning Error from Cybersource:
House/Box number not found on street.
could you please give valid number here which is the Cybersource service expecting number.

Callmanager, Unity Issue with Voice Mail

Hello Guys,
I am currently facing an issue with a Callmanager <-> Unity integration.
The situation is the following one:
All user own a voice mail box. User A forwarded its phone to his voice mailbox. User B forwarded its phone to User A.
If now User C calls User B, he gets forwarded to User A , of course. But if user A does not take the call, User C hears the voice mailbox from User B.
I would like to have for a special situation that User C hears the voice mailbox of User A.
Is this possible?
Thanks!

Hi there,
You can have a look into this setting which is available in Unity Connection 7.x ;
Via
Cisco Unity Connection Administration
Advanced (towards the bottom of the page)
Conversation Configuration
**Use Last (Rather than First) Redirecting Number for Routing Incoming Call**
You would need to think about what impact this might have on your setup, but it does allow
for users to Forward to their personal VM at times and the Helpdesk mesage when necessary
Hope this helps!
Rob

Not able to Print Invoice thru Crystal Integration

Hi All,
Could anybody help me on the issue given below.
One of our client Issue while printing from crystal Integration in SAP Business One. I can able to view the crystal report through Crystal Integration but i am unable to print the document.No Error is getting displayed .If i am printing from PLD it's working fine .After exporting to PDF from crytal integration i can able to Print but not able to print directly from the crystal Integration.
Thanks,
Vishwanath

Vishwanath,
Please post your question in this forum ...
Reporting and Printing
Eddy

Issue in XI to XI integration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for