Issue of MOAC Functionality on Purchase Orders

Hi,
I am facing an issue of receieving a Purchase Order in OU1 that belongs to OU2.
Two Responsibilities Using are
1. Purchasing, Vision Services (USA)
2. Purchasing, Vision Operations (USA)
Setup of MO profile options for these two Responsibilities.
For, Purchasing, Vision Services (USA), MO: Security Profile is set at Responsibity Level and the definition of HRMS Security Profile lists the two Operating Units : Vision Operations, Vision Services
Now, I raised a PO in Purchasing, Vision Operations (USA), approved it and want to recieve in Purchasing, Vision Services (USA). The issue is, in Receipts form, the PO is not visible. When I enter the PO, it is saying as Invalid Value for PO_NUM.
Please help me in this.
Thanks,
Naresh Mankala

Hi Rahul,
breaking SAP standard processes cause such inconsistent data. My sencere advice is to avoid these.
You can run report RM06C020 to correct this inconsistency.
Please read very carefully the information provided in SAP note 115899 and remember that this report is intended only to be used for correction once; it should never be planned periodically as a background job.
Hencefore you should check first that all notes mentioned in SAP note 128061 have been applied in order to prevent the creation of new inconsistencies.
Sanjeev

Similar Messages

  • Issued material procured in what purchase order?

    Hi
    I want to know an item that was issued, is procured in which purchase order and its vendor details.
    Can any one help me to find out.
    Thankyou
    Regards
    BalaKrishna

    Hi ,
    Kindly go through the procedure for the determination of teh BOM
    715192    Determination of BOM Usage when exploding BOM
    If several alternative BOMs exist, there is no possibility
    of selecting the desired BOM interactively. Instead,
    selection can be controlled via the following mechanisms:
    - SELECTION BY QUANTITY:
      A lot size interval for which the BOM is valid can be
      entered in the BOM header.
      A prerequisite is that the Selection method indicator is
      not set in the material master record (MRP 4 view).
    - SELECTION BY DATE:
      Can be set in the IMG under Production -> Basic Data ->
      Bill of Material -> Alternative Determination -> Define
      Alternative Determination for Multiple BOMs (transaction
      OS32). A prerequisite is that the Selection method
      indicator the is set to 1 in the material master record
      (MRP 4 view).
    - SELECTION BY PRODUCTION VERSION:
      Can be used if the same material has different BOMs with
      different suppliers.

  • MCEKPO-MENGE issue through 2LIS_02_ITM for Statistical Purchase Order Items

    Hello Everyone,
    I have come across this strange scenario where a given Purchase Order Item in the Source system - SAP R/3 has been changed in the following sequence,
    1. First the PO Item was marked as a Deleted PO - LOEKZ = L which set the STAPO = X (Statistical) and
    2. The Deletion Indicator was removed for the PO Item which means LOEKZ now is not having "L" and the STAPO also has been removed.
    Due to the above scenario, now the Order Quantity in the SAP BW system has 0 as the value whereas the Quantity in the SAP R/3 System shows up as 1.
    I was curious to know if there are any OSS Notes or processes in place to avoid this from happening. As I searched the forum and service place for the OSS notes related to this issue and could not find anything related.
    The Order Quantity in our system is extracted from 2LIS_02_ITM (MCEKPO-MENGE) field.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Dharma.

    hi Dharma..
    Did you find a solution for this post?
    I Have similar issue....
        I Have an issue (I think is issue)...with extractor 2LIS_02_ITM about reversal or deleted indicator….
    Some PO are created on R/3 and mark for deleted some line items… I try or I hope  received a “R” indicator…. But I didn´t receive the indicator…..
         I only receive “X” on this field.. (delete indicator). or in other examples  blank on this field
        What’s the difference between “X” , “R” and blank indicator?... when is posible receive X, R or blank value??
        I was thinking that when on R/3 some lines of PO orders were deleted.. I receive "R" indicator when I extract to  BW (on the PSA)... but I didn't...
       If you know how work this kind of cases or examples, please explain me more.. or let me know where can I find more information please.
        I will assign points to all the answer.
       Thank you
    Alice

  • Issue with Net price at Purchase order / Line item

    Dear All,
    I have an issue in the Purchase order, given below is the detail of the issue.
    PO/LI1 Consists a material A (Grid based), and with a condition record i have maintained sizewise pricing.
    Eg:  Size L - 1usd per 1, Size M - 2usd per 1 and Size S - 3usd per 1. Assume the quantity for each size been 10
    Thus at a Schedule line item level it would be as follows
    Grid   |  Schedule Qty  |  Net Price
    S              10                  3
    M              10                  2
    L               10                  1
    Thus at a PO/ Line item level the net price should be (6/30)that is (net value/net quantity)  = 0.2 per 1, in my system it doesnt show like as 02. per 1, it shows the net price of size L (in this instance it picks the price of size L and shows it as the NET PRICE at PO/LI Level
    What could be the possible reason this could happen, i believe this is a problem.Is there a place in configure where i can change the system to capture Net price at PO Line item =(Net Value / Net quantity) rather than picking the price of the size L.
    Other info
    Size L is the last Delivery Schedule line number
    Hope my question is clear.
    Thanks & Regards
    Shabeen
    Shabeen Buhary
    Edited by: shabenn on Dec 17, 2010 10:13 AM

    Hi,
    Even though you maintained different Prices for Different grids only default grid value only displayed at line item level. But if you do GR for those grids valuation will happened at as you mentioned the purchase order.
    regards,
    Siva reddy

  • Legal Control functionality for Purchase order

    Hi,
    We have a requirement where in while saving the Purchase Order, the system should look whether for that material if the legal control data/ foreign trade data is maintained specifying that it is a controlled substance then the licence should be maintained before saving the PO. If the licence is not maintained then the Purchase order should not be allowed to be saved.
    In a nut shell, we want to control the saving of Purchase order depending on whether the licence is maintained or not.
    This has been done for Sales order. The standard SAP functionality allows the document control.
    This can be seen in SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Foreign trade/Customs - Legal control - Document control.
    Here we can see that only Sales order and shipping documents can be controlled.
    Is there any way we can control the Purchase Ordr also?
    Please let me know for any clarification regarding the requirement.
    Regards,
    Ramachandra DN

    Hi Ramachandra,
    this kind of functionality is not available in SRM. Have a look into GTS Module, which can be connected to SRM for achiving your requirement. http://help.sap.com/saphelp_gts30/helpdata/en/1d/8082ab7248f74ca09861d9713b9a52/content.htm
    All somehow available control, compliance and trade features are available via GTS. Any further need to be accomplished via self development.
    Cheers,
    Claudia

  • LSMW issue using BAPI for changing Purchase Order G/L Account

    Wonder if anyone can help as I'm tearing my hair out!!
    Have used LSMW lots of times using the transaction recorder, but tried using a BAPI as we have a mass update to do of G/L Accounts for Purchase Orders and it seems the tidiest and most efficient way to do it.
    Got my LSMW project working as a test by changing the Short Text on a purchase order, this works fine.  However, when I add the Account Assignment details in (Structure E1BPMEPOACCOUNT and E1BPMEACCOUNTX) everything seems to run fine, the IDOC posts and gives message 'Document xxx changed'.  Yet when I look into the order it hasn't actually changed the G/L.
    If I go into the purchase order in change mode in another session and run the LSMW again it recognises the purchase order is locked so it seems to be doing everything right, just not updating the G/L Account field.  Anyone got any ideas ? It updated the short text fine so I'm sure everything is set up OK but for some reason it ignores the G/L that I upload.  Anything relating to the Account Assignment (Unloading Point, GR, Cost Center) just gets ignored if I try and upload a change.
    I seem to be so close it seems a shame not to be able to get it sorted !!!
    Thanks,

    Helen Smith wrote:
    HI Praveen,
    >
    > Thank you very much for your response.  I tested the BAPI as per yor instructions and the return message comes back 'Eng & other PO xxxx changed' so it seems to indicate a success message again (like the LSMW does) but the actual data doesn't update.
    >
    > I thought I'd found it as I searched OSS and found note  0001382965 which seemed exactly my problem.  I imported it and applied it but yet I still get the same issue - LSMW runs, says app doc posted and purchase order has been saved but no Account Assignment field will update.
    >
    > So it seems as if it's the BAPI not doing what it should - so I'm considering logging with SAPNET just to see if they can help as getting desperate with this one now! Felt sure I had it sorted when I found that note!
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Helen
    >
    > ** I should add I also ran the test above altering something in the item detail (the short text) - and that worked and updated.  So it still seems to point to the Account Assignment part of the BAPI not updating.
    >
    > Edited by: Helen Smith on Nov 2, 2010 4:35 PM
    Hi Helen,
    Just wondering whether you have found solution to your issue.
    We also encounter the same issue and have implemented the note without any positive result.
    Please share if you found the solution.
    Thank you.
    Abraham

  • Delete the partner function in purchase order

    Hi,
    I need to delete the partner function from a purchase order, but when I´m trying to delete the partner, this function not is working.
    How I can do it?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    when ever you create a PO,the partner functions which are privided in vendor master gets defaulted in PO.You can either delete the functions at vendor level or at the PO header partners tab.
    Regards,

  • Purchase order status issue

    Hi Everyone
    I am having an issue with the status of Purchase order. When the Purchase order has single account assignment, everything is fine. But when I create a purchase order with multiple account assignment, the first line item is correct but when I ad second line, the still to deliver quantity gets added correctly but the amounts only reflect the recent item and not the previous one.
    For example:
    Item 10            Quantity 10           
    Item 20            Quantity 10         CC xxxx         GL account 666666
                                                       CC yyyy         GL account 666666
    Status:    Ordered        20              200
                    Still to deliver 20             100
    Please help me with this issue.
    Thanks,
    Shalu
    Edited by: Shalu G on Feb 9, 2010 12:07 AM

    Resolved myself

  • Error during Post Goods Issue of Material in VL02N for STO Purchase Order

    I am getting one error message during Post goods issue of Material for STO Purchase order.
    I am doing the Post goods issue in T code VL02N
    Error is " Account type D is not defined for Document type WL"
    What is the settings required to be done.
    Thanks,
    Shailendra

    Please check Plant customer master reconsilation account properly maintained or not in XD03 transaction.

  • Post goods issue should be done depending on purchase order acknowledgement

    Hi All,
    In vl02n when i click postgood issue, it should check whether purchase order acknowldgement field in me21n is filled then post good issuse should be done.it its not filled post good issue should not be done. for this which badi or userexit i need to use and where do i need to write the code.

    Hello ,
    you can use BADI 'LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT' , this will trigger when you do PGI in VL02N , in that BADI implementation you need to raise/issue Error Message to stop PGI,That Error Should be captured in the Incomplete Log.
    for more details , please ref documentation of that BADI.
    regards
    Prabhu

  • Issue in purchase order print output

    Hi All,
    When we issue a print output from Purchase order  the special characters like u201C , u2018 , &  etc are appearing as # .But the print preview is  fine.
    In order to avoid this we have maintained the proper device type for the output device(In  transaction SPAD ).
    After this setup the upper part of the header text is appearing but lower part of header text still has # in place of the special characters .Please let me know how this can be avoided.
    Regards,
    S.Subasree

    Hi,
    It seems the problem is because of CODE PAGE or Drivers. Check the language settings in your system and driver settings output device.
    KR Jaideep,

  • How can I retrieve the Partners by Purchase Order Preview

    Hello Experts,
    we are facing an issue regarding the preview function for Purchase Order. We want to print some partners like the contact person in the form but when we use the function module ME_READ_PO_FOR_PRINTING to retrieve the data we cannot find the partners.
    Has someone an idea how we can solved this?
    Thank you very much,
    Marc

    In DOC-xekko-kunnr is available.
    with the kunnr goto KNA1and get the adrnr.for the adrnr you get get all the detaisl using the function module ADDR_GET_COMPLETE.
    This will give all the details

  • Old Purchase orders and template - Price Information not taken into account

    Hi experts,
    In MDM catalog, I have a product with 'Price Information' and with 'Contract price'. I create a shopping cart with the 'Price Information'.
    Then, I create another shopping cart using the anterior througth the functionality 'Old Purchase orders and template'.
    The price taken into account is the 'Contract Price'
    Is this the standard procedure?
    Thanks in advance,
    R Silva

    as far as i know the price preference is in this order
    1. Contract price
    2. Purchase Info record
    3. list price
    so in that case - this is standard procedure
    you can confirm - by doing the same process for an item that  has ONLY price information (list price) and see if that price is copied from old to new SC
    thanks
    -Adrivit

  • Error while closing the open purchase order for MRP run

    HI expets,
                     We are facing issue while closing the old purchase order(18.12.2007) for MRP run, if we are clicking delivery completed for the particular line item ,system is showing the error NET PRICE MUST BE GREATER THAN ZEROthough we have made GR and IR aganist the line item an value is also showing in the purchase order history tab, but in the condition tab there is no value showing for the particular line item .Kindly suggest the way forward.
    regards
    Karthick sundaram

    one thing for sure, you cannot proceed without maintaining proper conditions in the PO.
    Why they are not there or not anymore there is probably caused by customizing or vendor master data changes.

  • Deletion of Purchase order Via BAPI

    I want to delete a already created Purchase Order using a function module.
    Please guide.

    Hi
    Use BBP_PO_DELETE Function delete Purchase order.
    if you have more than one, then loop at table and call this function module to delete all PO's.
    or use BAPI_PO_DELETE_HISTORY
    Reward points if useful..
    Regards
    Nilesh

Maybe you are looking for