Issue with adding custom speed to a behavior

I am trying to add a custom speed to a write on behavior. The shape I am trying to write on works fine when I have it at any other speed setting but when I set it to custom (which I need to allow it to both write on and write off at the end) the shape disappears. Despite playing with the custom speed percentage, the shape never comes back. Any ideas?

Ok. I opened your project in my Motion 4 and after it updated it, I got the custom behavior to work fine. However, I had a thought so I decided to open it on my machine that's using Motion 3. There I noticed the problem you're having. I was unable to get the shape write on behavior to work either.
I believe the problem to be with your project. It appears slightly corrupt. Here's something you might try. Create a new project. Redraw your circle shape. Apply the write on behavior and keyframe it as I mentioned before. Then copy and paste it into your current sequence to replace the circle you have in there.
If that doesn't work, I'd rebuild your project. Instead of using all those strokes, just make one X and one O and one line. Then use clones for all the others. That should simplify the project quite a bit.

Similar Messages

Performance issue with a Custom view

Hi ,
I am pretty new to performance tuning and facing a performance issue with a custom view.
Execution time for view query is good but as soon as I append a where caluse to view query ,the execution time increases.
Below is the view query:
CREATE OR REPLACE XXX_INFO_VIEW AS
SELECT csb.system_id license_id,
cst.name license_number ,
csb.system_type_code license_type ,
csb.attribute3 lac , -- license authorization code
csb.attribute6 lat , -- license admin token
csb.attribute12 ols_reg, -- OLS Registration allowed flag
l.attribute4 license_biz_type ,
NVL (( SELECT 'Y' l_supp_flag
FROM csi_item_instances cii,
okc_k_lines_b a,
okc_k_items c
WHERE c.cle_id = a.id
AND a.lse_id = 9
AND c.jtot_object1_code = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
AND c.object1_id1 = cii.instance_id||''
AND cii.instance_status_id IN (3, 510)
AND cii.system_id = csb.system_id
AND a.sts_code IN ('SIGNED', 'ACTIVE')
AND NVL (a.date_terminated, a.end_date) > SYSDATE
AND ROWNUM < 2), 'N') active_supp_flag,
hp.party_name "Customer_Name" , -- Customer Name
hca.attribute12 FGE_FLAG,
(SELECT /*+INDEX (oklt OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1) */
nvl(max((decode(name, 'eSupport','2','Enterprise','1','Standard','1','TERM RTU','0','TERM RTS','0','Notfound'))),0) covName --TERM RTU and TERM RTS added as per Vijaya's suggestion APR302013
FROM OKC_K_LINES_B oklb1,
OKC_K_LINES_TL oklt,
OKC_K_LINES_B oklb2,
OKC_K_ITEMS oki,
CSI_item_instances cii
WHERE
OKI.JTOT_OBJECT1_CODE = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
AND oklb1.id=oklt.id
AND OKI.OBJECT1_ID1 =cii.instance_id||''
AND Oklb1.lse_id=2
AND oklb1.dnz_chr_id=oklb2.dnz_chr_id
AND oklb2.lse_id=9
AND oki.CLE_ID=oklb2.id
AND cii.system_id=csb.system_id
AND oklt.LANGUAGE=USERENV ('LANG')) COVERAGE_TYPE
FROM csi_systems_b csb ,
csi_systems_tl cst ,
hz_cust_accounts hca,
hz_parties hp,
fnd_lookup_values l
WHERE csb.system_type_code = l.lookup_code (+)
AND csb.system_id = cst.system_id
AND hca.cust_account_id =csb.customer_id
AND hca.party_id= hp.party_id
AND cst.language = USERENV ('LANG')
AND l.lookup_type (+) = 'CSI_SYSTEM_TYPE'
AND l.language (+) = USERENV ('LANG')
AND NVL (csb.end_date_active, SYSDATE+1) > SYSDATE)
I have forced an index to avoid Full table scan on OKC_K_LINES_TL and suppressed an index on CSI_item_instances.instance id to make the view query fast.
So when i do select * from XXX_INFO_VIEWit executes in a decent time,But when I try to do
select * from XXX_INFO_VIEW where active_supp_flag='Y' and coverage_type='1'
it takes lot of time.
Execution plan is same for both queries in terms of cost but with WHERE clause Number of bytes increases.
Below are the execution plans:
View query:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
     10 COUNT STOPKEY
          9 NESTED LOOPS
               7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1
                    5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299
                         2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155
                              1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                         4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                              3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                    6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
     12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
          11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1
          27 NESTED LOOPS
               25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768
                    23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757
                         20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578
                              17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606
                                   14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315
                                        13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                                   16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                                        15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                              19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
                                   18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                         22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10
                              21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9
                    24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
     43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
          41 NESTED LOOPS
               39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196
                    37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196
                         32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196
                              30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17
                                   29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
                              31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196
                         36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                              35 HASH JOIN
                                   33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                   34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                    38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1
          42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918
Execution plan for view query with WHERE clause:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211
     10 COUNT STOPKEY
          9 NESTED LOOPS
               7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1
                    5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299
                         2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155
                              1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                         4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                              3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                    6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
     12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
          11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
     28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1
          27 NESTED LOOPS
               25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768
                    23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757
                         20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578
                              17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606
                                   14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315
                                        13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
                                   16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
                                        15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
                              19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
                                   18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                         22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10
                              21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9
                    24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
     44 VIEW VIEW APPS.WRS_LICENSE_INFO_V Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211
          43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
               41 NESTED LOOPS
                    39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196
                         37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196
                              32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196
                                   30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17
                                        29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
                                   31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196
                              36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                   35 HASH JOIN
                                        33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                                        34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
                         38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                    40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1
               42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918

Hi,
You should always try using primary index fields, if not possible then secondary index fields.
Even if you cannot do anything from either of the two then try this,
Use Less distinct fields on the top.
In your case , you can use bukrs ,gjahr ,werks on the top in the where condition..then followed by less distinct values..
Even when you use secondary index if you have 4 fields in your sec index and you are using only two fields from the top then the index is useful only upto that two fields provided they are in sequence.

Issues with Infinity - Connection Speed & Other Pr...

Hi all,
I had Infinity installed on 2nd November. Besides some issues with BT mixing up delivery addresses the installation by Kelly Comms went smoothly, and was setup within 45 mins.
Initial speeds were very good, achieving 74Mb/s Down & 18Mb/s Up with a Ping/Latency of 5ms Excellent really considering the sub 5Mb/s I was used to with ADSL. The high connection speeds remained over the weekend until about 4pm on November 5th. I found that the Openreach Modem had lost connection (flashing DSL light) and my HH3 Broadband light was a steady orange. I left this for a while before picking up my landline to call customer services only to find that my line was dead with no dial tone.
Broadband eventually came back on service later that afternoon, but at a much lower speed of 43Mb/s Down, and an almost impossibly slow 0.97Mb/s Up. Ping/Latency has also slowed to around 20ms. During the evening I managed to get through to customer services in India, who were able to start dealing with the fault on my phone line.
Initially I was told it would be the 12th of November that the problem with the phone line would be resolved. Fortunately enough it was then fixed the following morning by an apparent engineer visit. I was unaware of this action until later in the day, but had noticed before leaving for work that Broadband was yet again down.
So to cut a long story short: I have a phone line that works, but a big reduction in connectivity speed especially upstream speed. Should I be contacting BT to investigate yet another potential problem bearing in mind that I am still within the supposed '10 day training' window.
(All speed tests have been conducted via a PC connected by ethernet directly to the HH3)
If anyone can advise me it would be much appreciated.

Hi Tidycarrot,
Welcome to the Forum. What was the speed estimate given to you when you signed up to the service? If the speeds you are see are well below that estimate, send me in your details using the link below and I'll run a few test on you line from here.
http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
Thanks
Paddy
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

IExpenses-12.1.3 Facing Issue with 2 custom text fields on the standard OAF

Dear All,
We are facing problem where custom text fields on standard OAF page does not retain their values when we traverse back-forth on the OAF page.
Here is the exact issue details
1) We added 2 text fields(Attribute5 and Attribute6) through personalization on Mileage Line Details Screen(standard OAF page) of iExpenses 12.1.3.
2) And business requirement is whenever user enters values into these fields, difference of these values is populated in third field which is standard field on that page.
Issue
When user enters values into above 2 fields, difference is calculated correctly however once he clicks on return page and comes back again on the detail page
then all the standard fields retain their values but 2 custom fields have blank value.
Is there any issue with personalization? or any other issue? Please suggest.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Thanks Pratap for checking
There is button named as "Calculate Amount" on the line details page so it is happening in below 2 scenario
1) When User enters values in 2 fields and clicks on Calculate Amount Button then values get disappeared from custom fields
2) When user clicks on return button, go to main page and clicks on detail button ( to come back on same line) then all the standard fields have valuece and custom one's disappeared.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Any issues with adding this card to my mac?

I would like to add a card to my mac pro that will enable me to capture video from certain types of HD video cameras.
1. Do I have a slot available to put in one of these cards?
2. Are there any potential issues with doing this?
3. I am guessing that by adding the card, it will create an open port on the back of the mac that will allow me to connect the camera.
http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/intensity/
I have the Dual-Core Intel XeonProcessor Speed: 3 GHz.
Thanks!!!!

The Intensity HDMI card is normally used to capture UNCOMPRESSED video from an HD vidcam.
Lets say, for example you get a Canon HV20 camera - it has both firewire and HDMI outs. The camera, being HDV, uses HDV compression to write to tape. So once video is on tape, you will be capturing HDV encoded video (just fine with FCP). The HDV standards dictate 1420x1080 even though the sensor of the HV20 is a native 1920x1080. But, since non-square pixels are used, consider it 1920x1080 aspect.
If you hook the HV20 to your Mac Pro using HDMI and the Intensity card, you can capture uncompressed, native 1920x1080 video. However, you better have enormous and extremely fast Raid storage, as it requires sustained data rates roughly, what, 100 times greater than HDV? And you better have a really long extension cord if you plan to use it in the field, as, you must remember, once written to tape it will be compressed HDV video, so the small gain you'll get from native uncompressed 1920x1080 video is only available at the time you shoot, and only out of the HDMI port.
HDV looks stunning as is, so unless you are a professional with special requirements (in which case I've not told you anything you don't already know), you may want to rethink this.
If you shoot well exposed HDV video, and edit with FCP or iMovie HD for that matter, and play back from tape to a 1920x1080i HDTV, it is as good as watching the Discovery Channel HD.
Good luck,
John F

Facing issue with adding systems in SMSY - solution manager

Hi all,
    We are facing an issue with the solution manager in tcode smsy. When i create a system in the corresponding component say ECC with product version ECC6.0.The next screen shows that the <SID> has been added successfully. But when i navigate to the path and i unable to see the system SID which i have created.
   Again i have tried to create the same system with same SID, but it shows that " SID already exists "
   Also i need another suggestion, we have planned to add 60 systems in the same solution manager. Kindly suggest me , how many systems we can add in single solution manager in maximum and for configuring EWA ?
Thanks
Raj

Hi Raj,
You can delete the old system entry and then try creating the saem again..
Also while creating mention correct product and version and the installation number.
You can also use the assistant for this.
Have you added all your servers and DB?
regards,
Raja. G
Edited by: Raja Gunasekaran on Aug 28, 2009 1:26 PM

Issues with OSSO ,custom login module and form based authentication

Hi:
We are facing issues with OSSO (Oracle Single Sign on ),Our application use the form based
authentication and Custom login module.
Application is going in infinite loop when we we try to login using osso ,from the logs
what I got is looks like tha when we we try to login from OSSO application goes to the login
page and it gets the remote user from request so it forwards it to the home page till now
it is correct behaviour ,but after that It looks like home page find that authentication is
not done and sends it back to the login page and login page again sends it to the home as it
finds that remote user is not null.
Our web.xml form authentication entry looks like this :
<login-config>
<auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
<form-login-config>
<form-login-page>/jsp/login.jsp</form-login-page>
<form-error-page>/jsp/couldnotlogin.jsp</form-error-page>
</form-login-config>
</login-config>
While entry in orion-application.xml has the following entry for custom login :
<jazn provider="XML">
     <property name="custom.loginmodule.provider" value="true" />
<property name="role.mapping.dynamic" value="true" />
</jazn>
Whether If I change the authentication type to BASIC and add the following line
in orion-application.xml will solve the issue :
<jazn provider="XML">
     <property name="custom.loginmodule.provider" value="true" />
<property name="role.mapping.dynamic" value="true" />
<jazn-web-app auth-method="SSO" >
</jazn>
Any help regarding it will be appreciated .
Thanks
Anil

Hi:
We are facing issues with OSSO (Oracle Single Sign on ),Our application use the form based
authentication and Custom login module.
Application is going in infinite loop when we we try to login using osso ,from the logs
what I got is looks like tha when we we try to login from OSSO application goes to the login
page and it gets the remote user from request so it forwards it to the home page till now
it is correct behaviour ,but after that It looks like home page find that authentication is
not done and sends it back to the login page and login page again sends it to the home as it
finds that remote user is not null.
Our web.xml form authentication entry looks like this :
<login-config>
<auth-method>FORM</auth-method>
<form-login-config>
<form-login-page>/jsp/login.jsp</form-login-page>
<form-error-page>/jsp/couldnotlogin.jsp</form-error-page>
</form-login-config>
</login-config>
While entry in orion-application.xml has the following entry for custom login :
<jazn provider="XML">
     <property name="custom.loginmodule.provider" value="true" />
<property name="role.mapping.dynamic" value="true" />
</jazn>
Whether If I change the authentication type to BASIC and add the following line
in orion-application.xml will solve the issue :
<jazn provider="XML">
     <property name="custom.loginmodule.provider" value="true" />
<property name="role.mapping.dynamic" value="true" />
<jazn-web-app auth-method="SSO" >
</jazn>
Any help regarding it will be appreciated .
Thanks
Anil

Issue with adding Long charater field in custom table

I have added a URL ( Internet address ) field ZZSSOURIADDR with data element AD_URI whose domain is long character and length 2048.On activation table gives an message in a log
Field ZZSSOURIADDR does not have a preceding length field of type INT4.
What needs to be done to remove this error?

As specified in SAP documentation, this must be the last field, and the previous one must be the actual length field type INT2. (suggestion: use data element AD_URILNG)
LCHR: Character string of any length, but has to be declared with a minimum of 256 characters. Fields of this type must be located at the end of transparent tables (in each table there can be only one such field) and must be preceded by a length field of type INT2. If there is an INSERT or UPDATE in ABAP programs, this length field must be filled with the length actually required. If the length field is not filled correctly, this may lead to a data loss in the LCHR field! A fields of this type cannot be used in the WHERE condition of a SELECT statement.
If error message wasn't clear enough, then try a where-used in transparent table of the data element AD_URI.
NB: You could also use in your development the central address, actual URL would be stored in ADR12 and only ADRNR is in your custom database table, more development (look for BAPI BUPA) but smaller database.
Regards,
Raymond

Issues with adding a line....

Can someone PLEASE give me some course of action to take here. I feel extremely frustrated and upset with Verizon, and none of the reps seem to want to be of any assistance at all……
Recently, my wife and I decided that it was time to consolidate our phones to one carrier. She previously had AT&T, and I have had Verizon for 11+ years. After calling and talking to SEVERAL Verizon reps, and insuring that my current features and promos would NOT change if I added my wife’s phone to my account, we went ahead and ported her line to Verizon. This is where all the issues begin.
To begin with, I called and talked to two different Verizon reps, who assured me that if I were to change my plan to a family share plan, I would CONTINUE receiving all discounts and promotions that I was already receiving on my primary line. They did note that some of these discounts would not be available to my “new” line, which was understandable, but again I was assured that I wouldn’t lose ANY promotions. The promotions that I am referring to are as follows:
18% Access Discount
Unlimited Email & Web
5 Friends and Family
Talk & Text Plus Data $20 Disc
Within the first week of adding my wife’s phone to my account, I noticed that I had indeed lost the “Talk & Text Plus Data $20 Disc”. I immediately called Verizon and inquired about why this promotion was lost, and I got several different arguments and rebuttals from the Verizon reps. The responses spanned the gamut of “There was never a $20 Disc on your account” to “That discount was only valid for 1 year upon enrolling”. I referred all the reps to the notes on my account that were written by the previous reps who assured me that this specific promo would remain. I also went as far as reading them the information I have on the promo stating that as long as I remain in a qualified plan, the $20 promo would remain for life. I was then told there was nothing they could do, and was transferred to “Loyalty”.
Once transferred to “Loyalty” I talked to a very nice rep, who pulled up the information on the discount and assured me AGAIN that I was eligible for this promotion and she put in what is called an “Inactive Pricing Request” form to have the promotion reinstated on my account. She also assured me that in the event that the promotion was not immediately applied to my account, she would set my account up for review when the new bill came out, and she would personally issue me the $20 credit.
To make a long story short, my new bill came, and there was no new credit. I called Verizon back, and asked to speak to “Loyalty”, and the rep gave me some run around about not being able to send me directly to loyalty without him attempting to help me first. Finally after a 10 – 15 minute conversation he transferred me to Loyalty. This time, the Loyalty rep told me that I was NOT eligible for the promotion. I had her review all the notes on my account from the previous rep, and she verified that red assured me I was eligible, had put in the inactive pricing request, and assured me she would give me the $20 credit if the promotion wasn’t added. The rep then told me that the other rep had bold-faced lied to me and she would be filing a complaint with her supervisor. I requested to speak to her supervisor.
Her supervisor got on the line and stated that she was aware of the situation, there was nothing that they could do, and that the other reps that assured me I was still eligible for the promotion would get complaints filed through their supervisors for inaccuracy. I asked this rep to EMAIL the last Loyalty rep that assisted me and have her call me. She obliged, and within 15 minutes I was back on the phone with the ORIGINAL Loyalty rep.
The ORIGINAL Loyalty rep reviewed all the new comments on my account, and AGAIN assured me that I was STILL ELIGIBLE for the promotion, and she was going to “escalate” the inactive pricing request. She also told me that she had discussed my situation with her supervisor, and after reading the promotion details he too agreed that I was eligible for the promo. She assured me that I would hear back from them regarding the status of the promotion being added back to my account before my bill due date.
Upon reviewing my bill I noticed that it was extremely high. Upon calling Verizon AGAIN, it was disclosed to me that since my wife’s number was ported into Verizon from AT&T, and they gave her a temporary number to use until the number was ported over, I was being billed TWO $35 line activation fees. One for her actual ported line, and the other for the “temporary number” that was only in existence for 1 hour, and never even used. Needless to say upon review, that $35 was credited back to me.
My dilemma now is what do I do? Even though several Verizon reps assured me that my discounts would remain, at least one of them didn’t. Since I have spent so much time fighting with Verizon reps on the phone, and awaiting my new bill, we are past the time to be able to cancel my wife’s line and revert everything back to the way it was. The benefit of this promotion was that I received a $20/mo discount through the life of my contract, with no end date. I have yet to hear back from the ORIGINAL Verizon Loyalty rep even though I have had her emailed again to contact me, and all the other Reps claim there is nothing that can be done, and I should’ve taken measures prior to upgrading to ensure my promotions would remain.

spottedcatfish wrote:
If you want consistent answers, always ask for official written documentation. For instance, you can read the Terms & Conditions of service on this website, and you should also recieve a copy when you sign a contract in store. Verizon has too many employees to be able to train them all perfectly, and then you can add in the inconsistency from all the different distribution channels (premium retailers, third party retailers like Amazon and Best Buy, etc.). Should they strive for it? Absolutely. Will that help you as a customer when you get a dumb or new rep? Nope. So help yourself, get your information in writing or don't believe what you hear.
While in theory this is a great idea, the problem lies with Verizon once again. When talking to the Verizon reps who tell me my account doesn't qualify, and they are able to "quote" to me the reasons from the promotional documentation, when I request they send me written proof of why I don't qualify, I get the reply "We can't release internal Verizon documents to the public." I quote them what the documentation I have states, and they claim their documentation is different, yet they aren't allowed to release any documentation proving my account is in fact ineligible.
Also, when requesting documentation as to why the "inactive pricing request" was denied, the response I get is that my account is not eligible. I ask for documentation and get the reply that the "inactive pricing requests" are done by a third party that is not affiliated with Verizon, and they can't release those documents to me either.
It seems a little odd to me that they have all this documentation that conflicts with all the information I have, yet they can't provide me proof of anything that is being said. The problem is they want you to think you are wrong. They want you to second guess yourself and hope you give up. It is much easier to tell a customer "No", rather then take the time to fix the issues at hand.

Issues with the Custom Filter in Datasheet View

I'm seeing some odd, yet intermittent, behavior while trying to filter columns in datasheet view using a custom filter. After clicking to apply a filter to a column and choosing 'Custom Filter...' a pop-up with regular expressions should appear much like
the following screenshot:
However sometimes, usually on a page refresh, this pops up instead:
I have been able to replicate this sporadically in both IE 8 and 9 against different columns but it's really inconsistent. I can't seem to find any configuration issues or commonality across the clients that might be responsible. Local installations of Office
are 32bit. I know 64bit has been known to cause some issues. I wanted to see if anyone else has run into this issue at all or perhaps it has been addressed in a more recent CU than what I am running (14.0.6117.5002). Any insight would be much appreciated,
thanks in advance.

Hello all
We get this as well on one computer in the office. It seems to be more of an MS Office issue than a Sharepoint issue specifically the "Microsoft Office List 14.0" ActiveX add in.
On one computer that has Office 2010, when "Edit in Datasheet" is clicked within a Sharepoint list the MS office list 14 ActiveX is called and the custom filter options appear with the missing combo boxes like in the picture at the top. I've found this is
reproducible by simply doing:
1. Visit a Sharepoint list
2. Actions > Edit in Datasheet
(If you click one of the drop downs at this point and choose Custom filter it will open as expected)
3. Actions > Show in standard view
4. Actions > Edit in Datasheet
5. Click one of the drop downs, choose Custom filter and the problem will occur
The only way to make the option reappear is to close down IE and reopen it. You'll then get one more go with point 1 and 2 above before the problem will reoccur again after changing the view using Actions.
Anyone using Office 2007 doesn't seem to have this problem however this uses a different version of the control namely "Microsoft Office List 12.0"
Uninstalling Office 2010 and reinstalling it seems to fix it for a bit but the problem will soon come back. Strangely it won't come back straight away but when it does its easy to reproduce following the above steps.
Testing this on another computer that just happens to have Office 2010 and Sharepoint Designer 2007 installed the problem does not occur however when the ActiveX is called for the Sharepoint list it just happens to invoke the Office List 12 version despite
the fact both versions are available on the machine.
This probably happens because Sharepoint Designer was installed after Office 2010 was installed on the machine so has updated the registry to call the older version which seems to be problem free.
ActiveX files
Microsoft Office List 12.0 = C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office12\STSLIST.DLL
Microsoft Office List 14.0 = C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\STSLIST.DLL
Version 14.0.6015.1000 - came with Office 2010 with SP1
I've tried patching version 14.0 STSLIST.dll to:
14.0.6130.5000 (KB2589349)
14.0.6137.5000
(KB2760804) - 9th April 2013 and is the newest I could find at the time.
Edit as I'm typing this: Just found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2817403 which is dated 11th June 2013 but doesn't mention any fix for this problem.
I've tried installing the Sharepoint services support components using the Sharepoint Designer installer package as below:
This includes the STSLIST.dll version 12.0 and updates the registry accordingly so that this component is referenced and does seem to fix the problem.
Unfortunately for me, when I checked back later the browser had reverted back to using the 14.0 component for reason I can't explain. Perhaps a Windows update came through and "adjusted" the registry settings to use the newer version. Unfortunately any attempt
at deleting the 14.0 file simply recreates it when "Edit in Datasheet" is choosen.
It would be great to get a proper fix for this instead of having to try and force the computer to use the older component!

Issue with SSIS Custom Components - 64 bit SQL 2012

Hello All,
Our SSIS packages built on SQL 2008 R2 make use of some custom components. These custom components are installed as part of an MSI. The dll's are copied over to the Windows/assemble [GAC Folder] and also to the Program Files(x86)/SQL Server/110/DTS/* folder.
The installation does not copy the dll's to the 64 bit program files folder.
X:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\DTS
These packages are executed via SQL Agent jobs on a 64 bit SQL server and there does not seem be any issue.
Now we are upgrading our servers to SQL 2012 and we have a new installer for the custom components as well. The new custom components use .NET Framework 4.0 and when installed the dll files get copied over to the Ms.NET 32 bit runtime GAC folder and also
to the SQL Server DTS Folder in x86. The upgraded packages work only when we set the runtime mode to 32 bit. The packages successfully executes within the 32 bit dtexec utility, but when we try to run the same package using a 64 bit dtexec utility the
process errors out with a component failed to load message. The package moves data between two SQL Server instances.
The custom components have always been built for 32 bit runtime. I can run a older package through the dtexec utility (from the 64 bit folder in program files) and it does work without any issues. After the upgrade the package will only execute on
a 32 bit utility. can someone help me understand this issue?
Regards, Dinesh

Thank you Arthur.
i think we got the answer as well, as the .NET framework 3.0 installer copied the files over to the C:\windows assembly the dtexec utility [32 bit/64 bit] was able to load the components.
Now with the new installer the files are copied to specific runtime gac folders as Arthur has mentioned. The 64 bit utility does not find the dlls in the GAC whereas the 32 bit version will find them.
Regards, Dinesh

Access 2010, Sharepoint 2010 issue with adding field to access db table

I needed to add an additional field to one of my access tables contained in the sharepoint list.
My application is a front end Access DB (run locally), and the backend is the 'data' database contained in the sharepoint lists.
I added the field to the database (called BOM). When I open the access list (from sharepoint) , and also look at the database in access, the field is there and things are fine.
However, it does not show up in my linked front end. I deleted the linked sharepoint tables from my front end, and then re-imported. Now I see the BOM field I created, but it has replaced the 'ID' field, which was the primary key. I had
added the 'BOM' field as the last field in the table. Now it is the first field, having replaced the 'ID' field.
What's going on here?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
This is the forum to discuss questions and feedback for Microsoft Office, and the issue more related to Sharepoint 2010, I'll move your question to the Sharepoint 2010 forum
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/home?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
George Zhao
TechNet Community Support

We need a new section entitled: Issues With Apple Customer Service

"This Feedback about the Discussions forum is intended for questions about how to use Apple Discussions and for general constructive feedback about how the Discussions system is operating or how it may be improved. Please use this forum appropriately. Failure to do so may result in your posting privileges to this forum being disabled.
If your question concerns a hardware or software technical issue, please do not post in this forum — instead, go to the Apple Discussions Homepage, select an appropriate product category and follow the links until you reach the correct forum for your post, then click the Post New Topic link. "
Alright, I have a suggestion for improvement. We need a new forum section for complaints about the way Apple is treating us.
To make sure I'm being clear, let me give you an example of just such a post that may be included in such a section.
I ordered online the family packs of Leopard, iWork '08 and iLife '08 on November 6th. I received an email telling me my order had been shipped on November 7th.
On November 9th I decided to check the progress of my shippment by logging on to FedEx. To my surprise, it had been delivered! Not to me but another party. I could download a PDF from FedEx and see the signature.
After trying to deal with FedEx for a few days I was finally told to deal with Apple because they would have to initiate the investigation. Fine. These things happen.
On 11/13/2007 I spoke with an Apple Customer Service Representative and received an Apple Issue Number and Case Number. I was told that it should be resolved in a few days. It wasn't.
11/20/2007, Here's where it gets interesting. In talking with them again I explained that since my signature was not on the FedEx ticket it had not been delivered properly if at all. I explained that since FedEx was clearly at fault the package should be shipped again. Finally they agreed. I was told that my package would be shipped and to expect an email.
11/23/2007, I was told again that nothing would be shipped until after an investigation had been completed. So did they lie? I spoke with a manager who kept repeating that he was sorry for the mis-communication. That became very frustrating to say the least. Remember, FedEx requires a signature. Without it or my permission to deliver somewhere else they must deliver to me and get my signature. The FedEx PDF clearly shows another persons signature.
Equally frustrating is the fact that they will not keep me informed as to the status. I have to call them and wait on hold. I did get a couple of emails with text along the lines of, "We continue to work with our carrier on your lost package. "
However, there is no way to reply to these form letters. The only way to stay in touch with Apple is to call and be put on hold.
Twice, after giving them my order number and being put on hold "while they look up my records" or whatever, the call was disconnected. I'm not saying they did so on purpose but the results were the same. Another call, another round of giving my order number and explaining to yet again a new person the details of the situation.
I've had many problems with Apple since becoming a customer in June of 2006 but I just can't let this go. I need a place to warn others. If you buy something, you might be better off buying it from a store instead of on-line. This kind of information is needed to warn others concerning the business practices of Apple should something go wrong. This is why we need a new section for putting forth such complaints.

It seems to me that the real problem here is with FedEx, as I have encountered similar types of problems with them in the past. Even though a signature is required, I have had packages left on my porch. When I enquired, someone had actually signed (i.e.forged) my name! Other times it has been left on my porch with some other signature. When I call to complain, FedEx just seems to think there is no problem as long as I got my package. They seem totally unconcerned even though a signature is required and I definitely did not authorize delivery with no signature. I have expressed my concerns directly to Apple, but have no way of knowing if it has done any good. I think this problem is worse with FedEx ground, as that is contracted out. Around here anyway, i think the drivers will sign the ticket and leave the package just so they won't have to make another trip. It's not right, and it's not supposed to happen this way, but i know it does.
Apple entrusted your package to FedEx in good faith that it would be delivered to you, and that your signature would be required for you to receive it. That should have resulted in you receiving it. however, due to a false signature, you did not. Clearly, FedEx is responsible.
If the package was supposedly delivered to your address, but has a false signature, I wonder if the driver might have signed the delivery ticket or gotten someone else to sign it and just left it on your porch or something like that. If so, it could have been subsequently stolen. If something like this happened, it might explain why things are so bogged down in the investigation at Apple. From their viewpoint, the package was delivered and a signature was obtained and they are probably being stonewalled by FedEx.
A user to user discussion forum such as Apple Discussions won't help with delivery problems. It's best to report them directly to Apple as you have done. If you continue to have problems, you can call Apple and ask to speak to Apple Customer Relations. They may well be able to cut through the red tape. You could also express your concern in the "Feedback to Apple" section. Maybe if enough people complain, they might consider awarding the shipping contract to someone else. Or perhaps the other shippers are even worse.
One of my recent shipments was evidently lost in a typhoon. But when I called Apple, a replacement was sent out immediately. This is more what I would expect of Apple, and you have every right to expect similar treatment.
If FedEx delivered to the wrong address and got a wrong signature, they should be expected to go back and retrieve the package. But if they delivered to your address and did not get your signature, then you would be well within your rights to go to your local Better Business Bureau and file a complaint against FedEx. That might possibly get some action of some sort. FedEx cannot ignore the BBB as easily as they can ignore you. If your signature was actually forged, you will certainly be able to prove that the signature on the delivery ticket is definitely not yours. And you could forward the BBB complaint to Apple. I don't know if this would help or just muddy the water, but it would put a little more pressure on FedEx I would think.
In the meantime, I would certainly speak to Apple Customer Relations and see if they can help you out here. They want happy Apple customers, and I think they would like to know about the extreme frustrations you are experiencing through no fault of your own.
I sympathize with your problems, and I hope that you are able to get them resolved soon.
Good luck!

Issue with calling custom function in merge command -10g

Hi,
I have ran into issue while calling a custom function in merge command.
It throws error 'Invalid identifier'. Oracle doesnt understand that it is a function and take the function name as column name.
Since no such collumn name exists, it throws 'Invalid identifier'.
Interestingly, merge command works fine when it has a oracle function (replace, decode).
The oracle version is 10.2.0.3
It is very urgent.
Any pointers will be helpful.
Regards,
Ravi

I don't have privileges to create dblink, but this is working for me.
So, i don't think function can be a issue here.
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
Elapsed: 00:00:01.02
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>create table hist_tab
2     as
3       select * from emp
4       where sal between 2000 and 4000;
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.09
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from hist_tab;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE         SAL       COMM     DEPTNO JOB1      DOB
      7844 TURNER     SALESMAN        7698 08-SEP-81       2178          0         30 SALESMAN
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>update hist_tab
2     set mgr = 7794;
1 row updated.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
satyaki>
satyaki>commit;
Commit complete.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from hist_tab;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE         SAL       COMM     DEPTNO JOB1      DOB
      7844 TURNER     SALESMAN        7794 08-SEP-81       2178          0         30 SALESMAN
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>create table tran_tab
2     as
3       select * from emp
4       where sal between 2000 and 7000;
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from tran_tab;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE         SAL       COMM     DEPTNO JOB1      DOB
      7844 TURNER     SALESMAN        7698 08-SEP-81       2178          0         30 SALESMAN
      7902 FORD       ANALYST         7566 03-DEC-81    5270.76                    20 ANALYST
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
satyaki>
satyaki>ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace function fun(c_in number)
2     return number
3     is
4       c_out number(4);
5     begin
6       if c_in < 7900 then
7          c_out := 0;
8       else
9         c_out := 1;
10       end if;
11       return c_out;
12*    end;
13 /
Function created.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.00
satyaki>
satyaki>merge into hist_tab o
2 using (
3     select empno,
4            ename,
5            job,
6            mgr,
7            hiredate,
8            sal,
9            comm,
10            deptno,
11            job1,
12            dob
13     from (
14              select k.*,
15                     rank() over(order by fun(k.empno)) rn
16              from tran_tab k
17          )
18     where rn = 1
19     ) n
20 on ( o.empno = n.empno)
21 when matched then
22    update set o.ename = n.ename,
23               o.job = n.job,
24               o.mgr = n.mgr,
25               o.hiredate = n.hiredate,
26               o.sal = n.sal,
27               o.comm = n.comm,
28               o.deptno = n.deptno,
29               o.job1 = n.job1,
30               o.dob = n.dob
31 when not matched then
32    insert(
33            o.empno,
34            o.ename,
35            o.job,
36            o.mgr,
37            o.hiredate,
38            o.sal,
39            o.comm,
40            o.deptno,
41            o.job1,
42            o.dob
43          )
44    values(
45            n.empno,
46            n.ename,
47            n.job,
48            n.mgr,
49            n.hiredate,
50            n.sal,
51            n.comm,
52            n.deptno,
53            n.job1,
54            n.dob
55          );
1 row merged.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from hist_tab;
     EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE         SAL       COMM     DEPTNO JOB1      DOB
      7844 TURNER     SALESMAN        7698 08-SEP-81       2178          0         30 SALESMAN
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
satyaki>You can check the final output with old output. It is working perfectly - i guess.
Regards.
Satyaki De.

Issue in Adding Custom Status Defnition for a resource object

Hi,
We have installed OIM and patch it to 9.102. We have created one custom resource object (flat file connector) for reconciliation. As part of requirement we need to define three status for this resource object - Enabled, Suspended and Disabled. As Enabled and Disabled status are available OOTB, i have added 'Suspended' status under the Status Definition in resource object. Now the issue is that if we are passing reconcile user status to either Enabled or Disabled, the status is changing fine on Linked user resource object. But if the status passed as 'Suspended' the resource account status of linked user (OIM) is not changed.
We have mapped the resource side Status attribute to OIM_OBJECT_STATUS under process definition. I also made the entry 'Suspended' in 'Lookup.Object Object Status' lookup to see if any help, but no luck.
The 'Suspended' status is successfully added in OST table against the object key and on manually updating the status key against the resource object it is reflecting 'Suspended' status through admin console. User-->Resource Profile
Does anyone have any clue if the requirement is correct (adding a custom object status) and so, where i am going wrong. Thanks in advance.

A quick doubt..If i have written down a process task and calling this on completion of 'Reconciliation Update Received' and in this process task , a adapter is attached which is updating the resource account status (ost_status) on the basis of some custom attributes. This task is working fine and updating the status. But the issue is that once this task is complete, the mapping in Process definition (loginDisabled <MetaDirectory> --> OIM_OBJECT_STATUS) overrides the status.
Per my understanding the flow is going like this-->
1. Reconciliation run
2. Event Linked
3. Reconciliation Update Received
4. Call The custom Task --> Update the OST Status
5. Update the OST Status per the mapping OIM_OBJECT_STATUS.
Is there any way we can implement that the status update in (5) occurs before (4) so that my custom task status can override the (5) as per my business requirement.

Issue with adding custom speed to a behavior

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for